* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download THE MARKETING COMMUNICATIONS PRO
Target audience wikipedia , lookup
Guerrilla marketing wikipedia , lookup
Digital marketing wikipedia , lookup
Neuromarketing wikipedia , lookup
Youth marketing wikipedia , lookup
Marketing plan wikipedia , lookup
Viral marketing wikipedia , lookup
Marketing research wikipedia , lookup
Ambush marketing wikipedia , lookup
Product planning wikipedia , lookup
Multicultural marketing wikipedia , lookup
Marketing strategy wikipedia , lookup
Street marketing wikipedia , lookup
Green marketing wikipedia , lookup
Marketing mix modeling wikipedia , lookup
Sensory branding wikipedia , lookup
Internal communications wikipedia , lookup
Direct marketing wikipedia , lookup
Global marketing wikipedia , lookup
Advertising campaign wikipedia , lookup
319 NEW BOOKS IN REVIEW THE MARKETING COMMUNICATIONS PROCESS, M. Wayne DeLozier. New York: McGrawHill Book Company, 1976. 324 pp. $12.95. M. Wayne DeLozier is Professor of Marketing at The University of South Carolina. In The Marketing Communications Process he attempts to construct a model in which all marketing activities are viewed within a framework of communication. From this view the marketer is seen not as someone who does things to consumers (and other firm "audiences"), but as an interactant in an ongoing dialogue with these individuals. Thus, price is as much a message as any advertisement or sales representative's conversation with a customer. Likewise, one can infer, although DeLozier does not pursue the argument here, that marketing research is a mechanism through which the firm receives unbiased messages from the external audiences. From this perspective, virtually every marketing activity can be seen as part of the various communication processes in which the firm is engaged. This perspective, though not original with DeLozier, has not been put into such a readable form before. The author is to be applauded for attempting to synthesize many of the sources that treat the various aspects of the subject. A communication model of the activities of the firm offers several advantages, one of which is the linkage that is formed between the research being conducted by marketers and that of others engaged in studying and implementing theoretical concepts about communication. Making such a linkage opens a broad field of study that heretofore has been tapped only by marketers studying advertising and promotion per se. Unlike much research in other social sciences, research in communication is notably full of direct implications for marketing management. Adopting a communication perspective does create some difficulties, however. The major drawback is the enormity of the area. Communication theory includes rhetorics (the study of sign systems), information theory, study of the diffusion of innovations, and many other topics. One can study human communication, nonhuman animal communication (ethology), or nonanimate communication (cybernetics). Within the subject of human communication, the choice may include a study of sign, symbol, or signal systems; verbal or nonverbal codes. DeLozier has limited his review to human communication, rhetorics and diffusion of innovations, and verbal symbolic systems. Only in passing does he make reference to study of sign systems and nonverbal communication. His orientation is obviously verbal because he consistently uses such words as "thoughts," "cognitions," and "grammar" to refer to communication; in discussing sign systems he qualifies the phrase with "(our language)" as if verbal systems were the only ones relevant for marketing. There is nothing inherently wrong about limiting a discussion of communication as DeLozier has done. if that limitation is specified carefully to make the reader aware that only part of the subject is being covered. Yet, there is some evidence that DeLozier is not aware of this limitation inherent in his treatment. For example, he has overlooked completely one of the most influential authors in nonverbal communication of the past 20 years, Edward T. Hall, a contributor to the marketing literature also. Likewise, certain misunderstandings may result from several statements made by the author (Chapter 5 seems to be particularly plagued with these). There are enough such statements to generate considerable frustration in the reader, as well as to obscure the content of the book and the notable contribution it makes. In essence, DeLozier's idea for a book of this nature is quite nice. But, the final product is not yet a complete one, either in content or in form. As it stands now, the book is somewhat flawed and uneven. The inclusion of more pertinent references, and more attention to theoretical issues, could make it a valuable introduction to marketing as communication. REBECCA H . HOLMAN The Pennsylvania State University ADVERTISING, COMPETITION AND MARKET CONDUCT IN OLIGOPOLY OVER TIME, Jean Jacques Lambin, Amsterdam, The Netherlands: North-Holland Publishing Company, 1976. 312 pp. $19.95. The general purpose of this book is to present the results of an empirical investigation of several more or less traditional controversies in the economics of advertising. The investigation is based upon data collected in eight Western European countries—Belgium, France, Holland, Germany, Denmark, Italy, Norway, and Sweden—covering 16 different product classes, including soft drinks, electric shavers, detergents, and gasoline. One hundred seven different brands are studied. The period of investigation ranges from 3 to 21 years, covering in most cases the decade 1960 to 1970. Depending upon the product class, annual, quarterly, or monthly data are employed. Econometric methods are used to analyze the data. Using a well-documented literature review, Lambin develops a theoretical framework within which six advertising issues are considered. These issues include determinants of advertising intensity, characteristics of the advertising function, and advertising versus market performance. Besides its international aspect, two other features of the study deserve note: (1) the adoption of a microanalytic approach instead of the more usual macro approach and (2) the emphasis on market conduct and actual competitive behavior at the brand and firm levels rather than at the industry level. These features differentiate the study from previous research