* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download Nobel Prize for of Cholesterol
Survey
Document related concepts
Cellular differentiation wikipedia , lookup
Cell encapsulation wikipedia , lookup
G protein–coupled receptor wikipedia , lookup
Cell culture wikipedia , lookup
Cell growth wikipedia , lookup
NMDA receptor wikipedia , lookup
Cytokinesis wikipedia , lookup
Cell membrane wikipedia , lookup
Endomembrane system wikipedia , lookup
Purinergic signalling wikipedia , lookup
Organ-on-a-chip wikipedia , lookup
List of types of proteins wikipedia , lookup
Cannabinoid receptor type 1 wikipedia , lookup
Transcript
NEWS IN PHYSIOLOGICAL SCIENCES Nobel Prize for Cellular Uptake of Cholesterol Nobel Prize was made in 1973 when The 1985 Nobel Prize in Physiologv or Medicine was awarded to Michael S. Brown and Joseph L. Goldstein for their discoveries concerning the regulation of cholesterol me- tor-bound LDL enters the cell by en- !X%of all myocardial infarcts. Famil- docytosis. The LDL receptor is localized in the cell membrane in socalled coated pits. After LDL has been bound to the receptor, the coated pit invaginates and pinches off to form a coated vesicle. Several vesicles thereafter fuse to form an ial hypercholesterolemia exists in different forms and is inherited as a monogenic dominant trait. Individuals who carry the mutant gene in RUI 7-nxATn u vv fn1,Tlf-l I” L&ALU thzlt LllLAL thP LAA” outer cell membranes have specific receptors for LDL and that the recep- and Goldstein the outer cell in the hypercholesterolemia the LXIV mnct *II-UC rnmmnn uv***IIIv** nf VI is a\] UIA Jic-*u eases of genetic origin. It affects one in 500 persons and is responsible for pairs (homozygotes) are severely af- fected. Their serum cholesterol levels are five times higher than in healthy persons, and severe athero- endosome. that mediate the uptake of the cholesterol-containing particles, called lipoprotein low-density (LDL), which circulate in the blood. The LDL endosome is then released inside the cell. The entire process is called receptor-mediated endocytosis. sclerosis and coronary infarction are seen already in adolescence. The discovery that the cells in these patients lack LDL receptors or have a LDL binds to the receptors and then Too few LDL-receptors in the cell membrane lead to a diminished LDL uptake and an increased level of LDL in the blood with subsequent risk of accumulation in the arterial walls. Using modern techniques, Brown and Goldstein were able to show that the LDL receptor is a glycoprotein lower than normal density of these lesterol is used by the cells for membrane formation and steroid hormone synthesis, and in addition it is involved in the regulation of choles- cholesterol nf VA membranes carry specific receptors enters the cell where its cholesterol is liberated by lysosomes. The cho- The Familial nno VllV receptors explains their high level of LDL, causing it to build up in the plasma and deposit in the arterial mechanisms of cholesterol metabolism and have opened the possibili- located in the cell membrane. Its protein part consists of 839 amino acids; 767 of these are localized on walls, producing atherosclerosis. These discoveries have stimulated research on the use of drugs, such as cholestyramine and menicholine, to increase the density of LDL receptors in the cell membranes of these patients. Thus, to quote Brown and ties for prevention and treatment of the cell surface, 22 in the interior of Goldstein, atherosclerosis and heart disease. Cholesterol has two main functions in the body. It is a structural component in cell membranes, and it is converted to certain hormones and bile salts. More than XI% of the cholesterol in the body is found in the membrane, and 50 inside the cell in the cytoplasm. When LDL is internalized by endocytosis, it suppresses the endogenous cholesterol synthesis and stimulates esterifaction of cholesterol. The LDL receptor is recycled between lysosomes and ble for many people to have their steak and live to enjoy it too.” cell terol metabolism. These discoveries have given insight into the basic membranes, Cholesterol is “It may one day be possi- By their work, Brown and Gold- stein have made three fundamental contributions: z ) the demonstration of cell surface receptors that mediate the endocytosis of macromolecules; the cell membrane for re-use. 2) the demonstration stored in cells of the adrenals and gonads where it is utilized for the In their studies Brown and Goldstein used cultured human fibro- cally transmitted defect in the LDL receptor produces familial hyper- production a geneti- blasts. Like all other cells, the fibro- cholesterolemia; trogen, testosterone, and cortisone. Cholesterol also takes part in the synthesis of vitamin D. Cholesterol is transported in blood and lym- blasts need cholesterol for their cell membranes. When studying the cholesterol metabolism of fibroblasts from patients suffering from familial phatic fluid packeted into lipopro- hypercholesterolemia, Brown teins. There are three kinds of lipoproteins classified on the basis of Goldstein found that blasts lacked functional these fibroLDL recep- lation of the concept of receptor diseases. These contributions represent a major breakthrough and clearly qualify Brown and Goldstein for the award they have received. Their discoveries have given new insight into their The particles that cholesterol are the low- density. transport density of hormones such as es- that lipoproteins The basic discovery 38 NIPS 1/February tors, whereas patients with a milder form of familial hypercholesterol- emia had a reduced number of LDL receptors. (LDL). that led to the Volume and 1986 and 3) the formu- the mechanisms underlying the regulation of cholesterol metabolism and the way the body utilizes protein structures to deliver a specific Downloaded from http://physiologyonline.physiology.org/ by 10.220.33.4 on August 9, 2017 tabolism. In 1973 Brown demonstrated that II 9nc-l c..lIILA fTr\lf-lctoiTl U”IU~LUIII 30th International Congress of Physiological Sciences The 30th International Congress of Physiological Sciences will be held in Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada, July 13-18, 1986. A brochure describing the Congress and containing registration and abstract forms has been mailed to more than 6,000 physiologists who requested it. Extra copies of these forms have been made available to national physiological societies. The Congress will begin with an opening ceremony in the Orpheum Theatre in downtown Vancouver, followed by a reception in nearby Robson Square on Sunday, July 13. The following day the scientific sessions will begin on the campus of the University of British Columbia. An interesting programme of invited lectures, symposia, and poster sessions has been arranged by the International Programme Committee. The campus of the University of British Columbia is one of the most beautiful in the world and provides many attractions and a convenient setting for the Congress. Social events during the week will include the following: the Congress Concert at which the Vancouver Bach Choir will perform Verdi’s Requiem, a banquet and entertainment, and a farewell barbecue. There will be opportunities for day trips and cruises to view the coastal scenery and Vancouver Island. In addition to the main scientific programme, there will be historical lectures and an historical exhibit as well as workshops on the teaching of physiology. The Congress will also include a trade exhibit. The closing ceremony on Friday July 18 at 6 P.M. will terminate the Congress. From May to October 1986, Vancouver will be the site of Expo '86, the largest special category exposition mounted in the Americas. This will be an added attraction for visitors but also means that it is essential to make reservations for travel and accommodations as early as possible. The Organising Committee is working hard to ensure that the Congress is highly successful and hopes to welcome a large number of physiologists from all over the world to Vancouver in 1986. For further information write to IUPS Secretariat, (j/o Venue West Ltd., 801-750 Jervis St., Vancouver, BC V6E 2A9, Canada (Telex 04-352848 VCR). Lung Collapse During Free Diving Total lung collapse in diving seals was inferred by P. F. Scholander in 1940. He had noticed that seals exhale immediately before diving; that is, they don’t fill their lungs with air as most of us would do before swimming underwater. Scholander also correctly interpreted his observation as a protective measure against the bends, or decompression sickness, known to be caused by supersaturation of the blood and tissues with nitrogen so that bubbles are formed when pressure is again reduced. The danger of repeated dives with air-filled lungs was unintentionally demonstrated by a human skindiver. A Danish physician, P. Paulev, who had practiced underwater escape techniques in a 2O-m-deep training tank, had dived repeatedly for 5 h, using the drop technique. In this method the diver, after a deep breath, pushes himself downward, and after he has descended 2 or 3 m, his chest is compressed so that he continues to drop to the bottom with increasing speed. After 60 such dives, each lasting about 2 min, Dr. Paulev developed pain in the joints, breathing difficulties, blurred vision, and abdominal pains. He was saved when a colleague found him in impending shock, rapidly diagnosed his condition, and placed him in a recompression chamber where the symptoms disappeared. There is now direct evidence that seals indeed avoid the danger of repeated dives by lung collapse, as Scholander inferred. An international team of nine scientists obtained arterial blood samples from diving Weddell seals during free dives that lasted up to 23 min at depths up to 230 m. The seals were instrumented to obtain blood samples during the dives, and these showed that nitrogen uptake is effectively stopped by the collapse of gasexchanging alsveoli at a depth of approximately 28 m (3.7 atm absolute pressure). At this depth the major fraction of the seal’s lung gas is compressed into nonexchanging seg- Downloaded from http://physiologyonline.physiology.org/ by 10.220.33.4 on August 9, 2017 metabolite, in this case cholesterol for membrane synthesis and for production of steroid hormones. The two Nobel Prize winners are from the same research institution, the Department of Molecular Genetics, University of Texas Health Science Center at Dallas, TX, where they carried out the work that today merits them the highest possible international esteem in science. Michael S. Brown was born in 1941 in New York. After receiving his BS and MD degrees at the University of Pennsylvania and after two years as intern and resident in medicine at Massachusetts General Hospital in Boston, he moved to Bethesda to work at the National Institute of Arthritis and Metabolic Diseases and later at the National Heart Institute. In 1971 he was appointed Assistant Professor of Medicine at the University of Texas Southwestern Medical School, where in 1977 he became Paul J. Thomas Professor of Genetics and Director of the Center of Genetic Disease. Joseph L. Goldstein was born in 1940 in Sumter, SC. He received his BS degree in 1962 at Washington and Lee University and his MD degree in 1966 at the University of Texas Southwestern Medical School, Dallas, After interning at Massachusetts General Hospital and working at National Institutes of Health and University of Washington School of Medicine in Seattle, he became, in 1972, head of the Division of Medical Genetics at the University of Texas Health Science Center, where in 1977 he was appointed Paul J. Thomas Professor of Medicine and Genetics. David Ottoson Karolinska Institutet Volume 1/February 1986 NIPS 39 merits 01 the respiratorI, tract, thus csff~v tivclty preventing entry of nitrogen into thrs blood. (Rcfcrvncp: Seal lungs collapse: during frrp diving: c~~~idencc from drteri,il nitrogen tensions scl~~nct~ I\‘wh. Lx: 229: 5.50-5~8. 1~185 ] h. \I( N. Opposite Effects of Opioids in Brain and Periphery 40 NE’S Volume I /February 1986 I &fICLE 2 ON READER SERVICE it 314: 533-534. 1985.3 K. LlcN. The hdoduhrph~rcal leetwesoverm r (:ross the blood-brain barrier. proved to hav(: positive reinforcing effect. suggc:stirlg that the airersive effect of naltresone \vas dut: tn blocking of central olliate receptors. Other CSperiments are in agreement with the cmnclusion that the aversive: effects of opiates arc! peripheral and are carried in the vag~s nerve from the Iwriphery (thv gut) to the tlrain. Lvhereas the I)ositi\rc? reinforcing or t:uphoric effm:ts are caused bv direct ac:tion ori central brain receptors. The investigatnrs suggest that attc*rnpts at blocking the peripheral opiate receptors may open an il\‘f?nuf: for combating the: adversiirct r:ffccts nf opiates on human patients lvho receive opiates for pain relief. (Kr:fr:rc:uce: Opposite moti~~ational effects of endogenous opioids in brain and peripher!.. Sulurc: I,ofld. intertace is Mty implemented lof IBM-PC & fl, APPLE II, II+, atxl Ik andtheDEC11ard3OOBertes. Avahtyolso~is-,as wetlasacomptetelineot trwdwxs-arKtyyes,evenanalog CARD Downloaded from http://physiologyonline.physiology.org/ by 10.220.33.4 on August 9, 2017 In humans the euphoric: or positive reinforcing effects of opiates are well knoivn to recreational users as well as addicts. yet, when opiates arc: used for pain c:ontrol. the effects art: often negative anal include nausea. I\ similar paradoxical effect has been demonstrated in rats. \‘Vhen paired Lvith visual environmental stimuli. opiatf?s produce positive reinforcement in rats but similar doses ad- minlstarcvi in idvnt ic.dl Idshlon produc:~ ,1\.ersive effects xvhcn [kiirfxl l<rith t,l\tt> stimuli ,L\ r~wlution of these pdrCldoxi( ,I] rffrc ts may nolv be close. I>rs. Bt:c.hara 2nd sari clcr Koov of the l’nivarsity of Toronto report that both r~ndogcnous dnd exogenous opioids produce positive rvlnfrlrc ing effects through action on braIn re( eptors but produ( e avcrsivc> vffvc ts through dLtion on peripheral rrxxptors. ~‘5 pw.idllv III the gut. ‘I’htl t~ulwriments lverr designed to ohstlrvv positive and negative c,fft:c ts on bc:h,lr.ioral prefcrcnces of r,jts. ‘1’0 distinguish brtwePn the opiate cffacts on t)r,tin receptors and periphcral receptors, the rats tvere injected \vith naltreuone or its derivative Ineth~lnaltrc,xontl. Ndltrekone. well AIIOIVII ns A t)lnt kt:r of the euphoric effects of oplatw. rrdclil\* ( rosses the blood-brain barrier and had an aversive effect on the: rdts. Thv methyl derivative. Lvhich dot5 not readily