Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Synaptogenesis wikipedia , lookup
Metastability in the brain wikipedia , lookup
Stimulus (physiology) wikipedia , lookup
Nervous system network models wikipedia , lookup
Neuroanatomy wikipedia , lookup
Optogenetics wikipedia , lookup
Neural engineering wikipedia , lookup
Subventricular zone wikipedia , lookup
Signal transduction wikipedia , lookup
Electrophysiology wikipedia , lookup
Channelrhodopsin wikipedia , lookup
Available online at www.sciencedirect.com Planar cell polarity signaling in neural development Fadel Tissir and André M Goffinet Planar cell polarity (PCP), the organization of cell sheets in the tangential plane, is regulated by a set of ‘core’ PCP genes. Over the last few years, evidence has accumulated that PCP signaling is important for brain development and function. PCP signaling in the neuroepithelium and otic placode controls neural tube closure, the organization of inner ear sensory cells and probably neural stem cell divisions. PCP signaling also acts in postmitotic neurons, and regulates neuronal migration, axon guidance as well as neuronal maturation and survival. Although several key players in PCP signaling have been identified, their mechanisms of action remain elusive, particularly in the nervous system. Address Université Catholique de Louvain, Institute of Neuroscience, Developmental Neurobiology, Avenue E. Mounier, 73, Box 7382, B1200 Brussels, Belgium Corresponding author: Tissir, Fadel ([email protected]) Current Opinion in Neurobiology 2010, 20:572–577 This review comes from a themed issue on Neuronal and glial cell biology Edited by Michael Ehlers and Franck Polleux Available online 14th June 2010 0959-4388/$ – see front matter # 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. DOI 10.1016/j.conb.2010.05.006 Introduction Planar cell polarity (PCP) refers to the organization of cell sheets in the tangential plane, along an anatomical axis perpendicular to the familiar, apicobasal cell polarity. Although PCP and its regulation have been scrutinized in Drosophila for decades [1–3], studies of PCP in vertebrates is recent, especially in neural development [4]. Since the nervous system derives from an epithelial neural plate, the involvement of PCP signaling in the neuroepithelium appears a posteriori quite trivial. What was less predictable, however, is that PCP signaling also plays crucial roles in axonal guidance, ependymal ciliogenesis, dendrite maturation, neural stem cell regulation, and even neuron survival, thus making it a major player. cells are decorated with prehairs that develop as an actinrich bundle before being incorporated in the cuticle. Normally, hairs develop at the distal cell side and point distally, and screenings for hair abnormalities led to identification of ‘core’ PCP genes Frizzled, Dishevelled, Van Gogh/strabismus, Prickle, Flamingo/starry night, and Diego. Interestingly, the role of Frizzled in PCP was identified before its role as Wnt receptor. PCP signaling relies on a polarized partition of protein complexes The consensus view is that PCP is mediated by transient asymmetric expression of surface membrane complexes in different sectors of the adherens junction (AJ) belt (Figure 1). In the wing, Flamingo is present symmetrically, whereas Frizzled and Van Gogh are targeted to opposing junctional domains, Frizzled to the distal side — where the hair is located — and Van Gogh to proximal side (Figure 2). Interactions mediated by these complexes propagate asymmetric signals from cell to cell, a distal signal via Dishevelled, and a proximal one via Prickle. A key and largely unresolved issue is how these particular distributions are achieved at the molecular and cellular levels [9]. Since Flamingo is distributed both in proximal and distal membranes, it was looked at as a scaffold between adjacent cells that stabilizes PCP protein complexes. However, recent data showed that Flamingo mediates instructively PCP signals by recruiting selectively Frizzled to distal, and Van Gogh to proximal AJs [10]. AJs are located apically to septate junctions (the equivalent of tight junctions) in flies, whereas they are located basally to tight junctions in vertebrates. This difference might have implications for understanding PCP protein insertion to AJs [11]. Perhaps, targeting to AJs in Drosophila could use mechanisms for apical targeting, whereas it could share features of basolateral traffic in vertebrates. Another complex and controversial issue concerns the role of Wnt factors. Although they do not mediate PCP in flies [10], non-canonical Wnt pathways are implicated in events that resemble PCP in zebrafish and frog, such as the convergent extension (CE) during gastrulation [12]. In mice, Wnt factors are believed to tune PCP signaling in the nervous system [13]. The fact that Wnt mutants do not display PCP phenotypes might reflect redundancy among the 19 mammalian Wnt molecules. Norrin, a non-Wnt ligand, can bind Frizzled4 (Fzd4) [14], suggesting that unidentified Fzd ligands may be implicated in vertebrate PCP. Lessons from Drosophila: core PCP genes In flies, the main readout of PCP is the organization of hairs on the wing [2], and to a lesser extent ommadia rotation [5], orientation of body appendages [6] and somatosensory organ precursor division [7,8]. Pupal wing Current Opinion in Neurobiology 2010, 20:572–577 Relationship between PCP and anatomical axes Polarized expression of Frizzled and Van Gogh, with symmetric expression of Flamingo, can be schematized as elementary vectors F–V (Figure 2). One interesting www.sciencedirect.com Planar cell polarity signaling in neural development Tissir and Goffinet 573 Figure 1 Asymmetric localization of PCP protein complexes. By analogy with the situation in the fly wing, adjacent cells (a) and (b) can interact asymmetrically by expressing one of the three Flamingo orthologs Celsr1, 2 or 3 (blue) in both membranes. Celsr proteins are large (more than 3000 aminoacids) multidomain seven pass cadherins that bind by homophilic interaction. Frizzled orthologs Fzd3 or 6 bind to Celsr in ‘cis’ in one membrane, whereas Van Gogh ortholog Vangl2 interacts also in ‘cis’ with Celsr in the apposed membrane. Fzd are seven-pass transmembrane proteins of about 670 residues, and Vangl2 is a tetraspanin, with very small extracellular loops, of about 520 aminoacids. Adapted from models of PCP signaling in Drosophila (e.g. [9,10]). issue is how are those F–V vectors oriented with respect to anatomically defined axes? In some instances, such as the wing, F–V vectors are parallel to the proximodistal axis. They are also parallel to the direction of the mitotic spindle in asymmetric cell division in sensory organs (Figure 3) [15]. On the other hand, in the cochlea where CE is important for elongation, F–V vectors are directed from medial to lateral, perpendicular to the anatomical cochlear axis. Possibly, when a structure elongates by CE stricto sensu, via cell movement without cell division, this may be likened to ‘a cook working his paste into a roll’, with force applied perpendicular to the elongation movement. When a structure is modified by cell division, however, then F–V vectors would be predicted to align with the orientation of the spindle, parallel to the anatomical axis. If this view proves correct, the distribution of PCP proteins should not always be consistent with the direction of the elongating anatomical axis, further hampering interpretation. Expression of core PCP genes during brain development in mice Human and mice have 10 Frizzled (Fzd1–10), four Prickle (Prickle1–4), three Dishevelled (Dvl1–3), two Van Gogh (Vangl1 and 2) and three Flamingo/starry night www.sciencedirect.com Figure 2 Model for PCP-mediated cell–cell interactions during neural development. Membrane protein complexes mediate interactions between two adjacent cells (a) and (b) or between growth cones and guidepost cells. They provide asymmetric (polarizing) signals via Disheveled (grey), Celsr (blue), and Fzd (green) on the one hand; and via Prickle (orange), Celsr (blue), and Vangl2 (red) on the other hand. Intracellular signals impact on the actin cytoskeleton, for example, via formins, and thereby regulate development of structures such as hair or growth cone tips. PCP signals also instruct docking of cilia and may impact on oriented cell division as schematized in Figure 3. The asymmetry of protein complexes specifies the direction of a PCP vector that can be parallel or perpendicular to the anatomical axis. Adapted from Ref. [9]. orthologs (Celsr1–3, ‘cadherin EGF laminin seven-pass receptors 1–3’). Orthologs are also described in zebrafish and Xenopus, sometimes under different names, and some in duplicate because of partial tetraploidy; for example, there are two Celsr1 (1a and 1b) in zebrafish. PCP gene orthologs are expressed during brain development [16]. Celsr1–3 have specific expression patterns. Celsr1 is restricted to NSC, Celsr3 predominant in postmitotic cells, and Celsr2 present in both, more in postmitotic cells than in NSC, and persists in the adult. Fzd3 and Fzd6 may be the main Frizzled orthologs implicated in PCP. Fzd3 is widely expressed in ventricular zones of NSC proliferation, as well as in postmitotic neurons. Vangl2 is highly expressed at all stages, in NSC and all neural cells, a pattern reminiscent to that of Fzd3, whereas Vangl1 is focally expressed. Dvl1 is expressed in NSC and postmitotic cells, and persists in the adult; Dvl2 is restricted to NCS; and Dvl3 is confined to postmitotic cells. Prickle1 and 2 are expressed in different regions of the developing brain, mainly by postmitotic cells, and are not downregulated in the adult. Overall, expression patterns suggest that PCP genes may cooperate in two sets, both of which include Fzd3 and Vangl2, together with either Celsr1 or Celsr2,3. Celsr1, Fzd3 and Vangl2 would regulate PCP in NSC, whereas Celsr2,3, Fzd3 and Vangl2 act in postmitotic neural cells. Current Opinion in Neurobiology 2010, 20:572–577 574 Neuronal and glial cell biology Figure 3 Tentative model for regulation of asymmetric divisions and neurogenesis. In Drosophila, the sensory organ precursor pI divides asymmetrically into pIIb and pIIa. The division occurs along the rostrocaudal axis, and a PCP signal aligns the spindle along that axis, via Van Gogh and Flamingo (rostral distribution), and Frizzled/Flamingo (caudal distribution). A similar mechanism could apply to facial branchiomotor (FBM) neuron migration. During facial FBM neuron generation, a precursor would divide asymmetrically and give rise to an ependymal (or another) cell, and a FBM neuron. Precursor division would align along a PCP axis, under control of Celsr1 together with Fzd3 and Vangl2. This would specify the direction taken by migrating neurons. The ability to migrate is conferred by another PCP signal generated by Celsr2,3 with Fzd3 and Vangl2 [33]. Adapted from Ref. [8]. PCP, the organization of inner ear receptor cells, and neural tube closure Actin stereocilia on the apical surface of cochlear receptor cells form a ‘V’ centered on a primary kinocilium at the tip. Organization of stereocilia is affected in mice with mutations of Celsr1 [17], Vangl2 [18,19] and Fzd3 and 6 [20]. Analysis of the planar distribution of PCP molecules suggests that a PCP signal transversal to the cochlear axis governs the position and orientation of the kinocilium, which in turn affects orientation of stereocilia [21]. The organization of stereocilia in vestibular hair cells is less evident than in the cochlea, but also controlled by PCP signals [22]. In maculae, there is a symmetric organization of stereocilia relatively to a line of reversal, a pattern reminiscent of the mirror rotation of ommatidia relatively to the equator in the fly retina. Remarkably, both patterns are defective in PCP mutants. Neural tube closure has been reviewed recently [23]. Mice with inactivation of Fzd3 [24], Vangl2 [25,26], and Current Opinion in Neurobiology 2010, 20:572–577 Celsr1 [17,27] have a looping tail phenotype typical of defective CE in the caudal neural tube. Fzd3 [24], double Fzd3 and Fzd6 [20], Vangl2 [25,26], double Dvl1 and Dvl2 [28] and Celsr1 [17,27] mutants have craniorachischisis. Studies in zebrafish attributed failure of neural tube closure to defective CE, with broadening of the floor plate that prevents dorsal joining and closure [29]. To our knowledge, it is not entirely clear whether neural plate elongation proceeds by CE, or by directed cell division, or both. Elongation by CE would predict that F–V vectors be directed along the mediolateral direction, whereas vectors would be aligned in the rostrocaudal direction if mitotic divisions play a role. Additional investigations of PCP proteins distribution and mitotic spindle orientation are needed to understand this further. A role for Vangl2 in spindle orientation in the embryonic brain has been reported. However, this study focused on spindle orientation along the apicobasal axis (late in development) and did not address orientation along the anterior–posterior and mediolateral axes during neural tube closure [30]. Recently, craniorachischisis was reported in mice with mutations of Sec24b, which regulates traffic of Vangl2 to the membrane [31,32], providing a first hint at the mechanisms whereby cells distribute Fzd, Vangl and Celsr complexes in different regions of the cell membrane [11]. PCP, neural stem cell biology, and neuronal migration and maturation Expression patterns suggest roles of Celsr1 in NSC, and Celsr2–3 in brain maturation. This ‘dual’ system was investigated during caudal migration of facial branchiomotor (FBM) neurons from rhombomere (r)4, where they are generated, to r6 where they settle and form nucleus VII. Loss of function of Celsr1 in NSC results into abnormal migration of daughter FBM neurons, in rostral, lateral and caudal directions. This phenotype is not seen when Celsr1 is conditionally inactivated in FBM neurons (using Isl1-Cre mice), showing that Celsr1 function is non-FBM neuron autonomous, and perhaps involves oriented precursor division (Figure 3). In contrast, mutation of Celsr2 does not compromise the direction of migration, but shortens the caudal movement of migrating neurons that stop prematurely and settle in ectopic position in r4–r5 instead of r6. Double inactivation of Celsr2 and 3 enhances this phenotype and results in neuronal apoptosis. Mutation of Fzd3 mimics combined inactivation of Celsr2 and 3 [33]. Inactivation of Vangl2 in mice, and of Fzd3, Celsr2 and Vangl2 in zebrafish also perturb FBM neuron migration [34,35], confirming that PCP signaling is involved. The view that Celsr2 and 3 regulate PCP signals required for neuronal maturation is further supported by observations that adult Celsr2 mutant brains are atrophic, with reduced branching of dendrites and neuronal degeneration (FT, AMG, unpublished). Studies of dendrite growth in primary cultured www.sciencedirect.com Planar cell polarity signaling in neural development Tissir and Goffinet 575 neurons indicate that Celsr2 and 3 have opposing roles [36]. In addition to Celsr1–3, PCP signaling events probably implicate Fzd3 or Fzd6, Vangl2, and Dvl and Prickle partners that remain to be identified. Importantly, Celsr1, Fzd3, Vangl2, and Dvl1-2 are expressed in the adult brain in telencephalic subependymal zones and subgranular layer of the dentate gyrus. It will be interesting to investigate the role of these genes in neurogenesis and neuronal migration in the mature brain. PCP and brain wiring Mutations of Celsr3 and Fzd3 generate similar axonal guidance defects along the whole neuraxis, with prominent wiring abnormalities in the spinal cord, brainstem, mid- and forebrain [13,24,37,38], indicating that PCP molecules have wider roles than other axonal guidance systems which have a more local or restricted action [39]. Defective non-canonical Wnt signaling was proposed to account for wiring defects in Fzd3 mutants [13]. On the other hand, region-specific ablation of Celsr3 suggests that PCP signaling is mediated by direct interactions between growth cones and guidepost cells [38]. Whereas the role of PCP molecules in the neuroepithelium is relatively easy to conceptualize, it is more challenging to explain how PCP-like mechanisms affect axonal pathfinding. Studies of the impact of PCP signaling on actin dynamics and/or centrosome positioning may provide interesting cues. PCP and ciliogenesis PCP governs cilia development in epidermis of larval Xenopus. Morpholino downregulation of Dishevelled1-3, Inturned, and Fuzzy affects the actin cytoskeleton and apical docking of ciliary basal bodies [40]. Recently, Celsr2 and Celsr3 were shown to be required for the development of ependymal cilia in mice [41]. Combined loss of Celsr2 and Celsr3 severely impairs ciliogenesis, leading to defective flow of cerebrospinal fluid and lethal hydrocephalus. Although differentiation of ependymal cells is not primarily affected, ependymal cilia never develop in normal numbers and display abnormalities in morphology, position, and planar organization. Ciliary basal feet are misoriented, and basal bodies and cilia assemble deep in the cytoplasm. The lateral plasma membrane localization of Vangl2 and Frizzled3 is disrupted in ependymal cell precursors, providing strong indication that Celsr2 and Celsr3 regulate ciliogenesis via PCP signaling. In the inner ear, asymmetric distribution of PCP proteins is detected before and probably required for cilia development [22,42]. Reciprocally, PCP proteins are normally distributed in cilia-defective mutant mice Ift888 and Kif3a [42,43], suggesting that cilia are not essential for the proper localization of PCP proteins. Altogether, these data show that PCP signaling acts upstream of ciliogenesis and regulates the positioning of basal bodies and the apical docking of cilia. www.sciencedirect.com Conclusion: towards a unifying view? Evidence is accumulating that a main effect of PCP signaling is to regulate actin dynamics, which is known — from studies in brain development and other fields — to impact on directional growth cone navigation [44], basal body cilia docking, neuronal migration [45], dendrite growth and maintenance [46], and on directed mitotic division, at least in oocytes [47]. Key questions remain. We do not know whether extracellular signals are involved in PCP signaling, nor the links between PCP proteins and the actin microfilament network. About the latter, formin proteins Daam1 and Daam2 interact physically with the Dvl adapter and mediate interactions between actin microfilaments and microtubules, making the formin family an obvious candidate [48]. References and recommended reading Papers of particular interest, published within the period of review, have been highlighted as: of special interest of outstanding interest 1. Klein TJ, Mlodzik M: Planar cell polarization: an emerging model points in the right direction. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol 2005, 21:155-176. 2. Adler PN: Planar signaling and morphogenesis in Drosophila. Dev Cell 2002, 2:525-535. 3. Lawrence PA, Struhl G, Casal J: Planar cell polarity: one or two pathways? Nat Rev Genet 2007, 8:555-563. 4. Goodrich LV: The plane facts of PCP in the CNS. Neuron 2008, 60:9-16. 5. Zheng L, Zhang J, Carthew RW: Frizzled regulates mirrorsymmetric pattern formation in the Drosophila eye. Development 1995, 121:3045-3055. 6. Fabre CCG, Casal J, Lawrence PA: The abdomen of Drosophila: does planar cell polarity orient the neurons of mechanosensory bristles? Neural Dev 2008, 3:12. 7. Bellaiche Y, Beaudoin-Massiani O, Stuttem I, Schweisguth F: The planar cell polarity protein Strabismus promotes Pins anterior localization during asymmetric division of sensory organ precursor cells in Drosophila. Development 2004, 131:469-478. 8. Segalen M, Bellaiche Y: Cell division orientation and planar cell polarity pathways. Semin Cell Dev Biol 2009, 20:972-977. A critical review focused on how PCP signaling can regulate asymmetric division. Similar mechanisms can be involved in neural stem cell divisions. 9. Strutt H, Strutt D: Asymmetric localisation of planar polarity proteins: mechanisms and consequences. Semin Cell Dev Biol 2009, 20:957-963. A well-balanced review on the present understanding of the asymmetry of PCP signaling complexes, remaining questions, main consequences and suggestions for future studies. 10. Chen WS, Antic D, Matis M, Logan CY, Povelones M, Anderson GA, Nusse R, Axelrod JD: Asymmetric homotypic interactions of the atypical cadherin flamingo mediate intercellular polarity signaling. Cell 2008, 133:1093-1105. This study shows that flamingo does not only serve as a structural protein in PCP signaling complexes, but plays an instructive role in the polarized distribution of Fz and Vang by recruiting differentially Fz and vang to opposite cell borders. It also shows a physical interaction between flamingo and Fz. 11. Wirtz-Peitz F, Zallen JA: Junctional trafficking and epithelial morphogenesis. Curr Opin Genet Dev 2009, 19:350-356. 12. Carreira-Barbosa F, Kajita M, Morel V, Wada H, Okamoto H, Martinez Arias A, Fujita Y, Wilson SW, Tada M: Flamingo Current Opinion in Neurobiology 2010, 20:572–577 576 Neuronal and glial cell biology regulates epiboly and convergence/extension movements through cell cohesive and signalling functions during zebrafish gastrulation. Development 2009, 136:383-392. 13. Lyuksyutova AI, Lu CC, Milanesio N, King LA, Guo N, Wang Y, Nathans J, Tessier-Lavigne M, Zou Y: Anterior–posterior guidance of commissural axons by Wnt-frizzled signaling. Science 2003, 302:1984-1988. 14. Xu Q, Wang Y, Dabdoub A, Smallwood PM, Williams J, Woods C, Kelley MW, Jiang L, Tasman W, Zhang K et al.: Vascular development in the retina and inner ear: control by Norrin and Frizzled-4, a high-affinity ligand–receptor pair. Cell 2004, 116:883-895. 15. Bellaiche Y, Gho M, Kaltschmidt JA, Brand AH, Schweisguth F: Frizzled regulates localization of cell-fate determinants and mitotic spindle rotation during asymmetric cell division. Nat Cell Biol 2001, 3:50-57. 16. Tissir F, Goffinet AM: Expression of planar cell polarity genes during development of the mouse CNS. Eur J Neurosci 2006, 23:597-607. 17. Curtin JA, Quint E, Tsipouri V, Arkell RM, Cattanach B, Copp AJ, Henderson DJ, Spurr N, Stanier P, Fisher EM et al.: Mutation of Celsr1 disrupts planar polarity of inner ear hair cells and causes severe neural tube defects in the mouse. Curr Biol 2003, 13:1129-1133. 18. Montcouquiol M, Rachel RA, Lanford PJ, Copeland NG, Jenkins NA, Kelley MW: Identification of Vangl2 and Scrb1 as planar polarity genes in mammals. Nature 2003, 423:173-177. 19. Montcouquiol M, Sans N, Huss D, Kach J, Dickman JD, Forge A, Rachel RA, Copeland NG, Jenkins NA, Bogani D et al.: Asymmetric localization of Vangl2 and Fz3 indicate novel mechanisms for planar cell polarity in mammals. J Neurosci 2006, 26:5265-5275. 20. Wang Y, Guo N, Nathans J: The role of Frizzled3 and Frizzled6 in neural tube closure and in the planar polarity of inner-ear sensory hair cells. J Neurosci 2006, 26:2147-2156. 21. Rida PC, Chen P: Line up and listen: planar cell polarity regulation in the mammalian inner ear. Semin Cell Dev Biol 2009, 20:978-985. 22. Deans MR, Antic D, Suyama K, Scott MP, Axelrod JD, Goodrich LV: Asymmetric distribution of prickle-like 2 reveals an early underlying polarization of vestibular sensory epithelia in the inner ear. J Neurosci 2007, 27:3139-3147. 23. Copp AJ, Greene ND: Genetics and development of neural tube defects. J Pathol 2010, 220:217-230. 24. Wang Y, Thekdi N, Smallwood PM, Macke JP, Nathans J: Frizzled-3 is required for the development of major fiber tracts in the rostral CNS. J Neurosci 2002, 22:8563-8573. 25. Kibar Z, Vogan KJ, Groulx N, Justice MJ, Underhill DA, Gros P: Ltap, a mammalian homolog of Drosophila Strabismus/Van Gogh, is altered in the mouse neural tube mutant loop-tail. Nat Genet 2001, 28:251-255. 26. Murdoch JN, Doudney K, Paternotte C, Copp AJ, Stanier P: Severe neural tube defects in the loop-tail mouse result from mutation of Lpp1, a novel gene involved in floor plate specification. Hum Mol Genet 2001, 10:2593-2601. 27. Ravni A, Qu Y, Goffinet AM, Tissir F: Planar cell polarity cadherin Celsr1 regulates skin hair patterning in the mouse. J Invest Dermatol 2009, 129:2507-2509. This paper points to similarity of hair patterning phenotypes between Celsr1 and Fzd6 mutant mice, thereby implicating Celsr1 and Fzd6 as partners in PCP signaling. 28. Hamblet NS, Lijam N, Ruiz-Lozano P, Wang J, Yang Y, Luo Z, Mei L, Chien KR, Sussman DJ, Wynshaw-Boris A: Dishevelled 2 is essential for cardiac outflow tract development, somite segmentation and neural tube closure. Development 2002, 129:5827-5838. 29. Ciruna B, Jenny A, Lee D, Mlodzik M, Schier AF: Planar cell polarity signalling couples cell division and morphogenesis during neurulation. Nature 2006, 439:220-224. Current Opinion in Neurobiology 2010, 20:572–577 30. Lake BB, Sokol SY: Strabismus regulates asymmetric cell divisions and cell fate determination in the mouse brain. J Cell Biol 2009, 185:59-66. 31. Merte J, Jensen D, Wright K, Sarsfield S, Wang Y, Schekman R, Ginty DD: Sec24b selectively sorts Vangl2 to regulate planar cell polarity during neural tube closure. Nat Cell Biol 2010, 12:41-46 sup pp. 41–48. See annotation to Ref. [32]. 32. Wansleeben C, Feitsma H, Montcouquiol M, Kroon C, Cuppen E, Meijlink F: Planar cell polarity defects and defective Vangl2 trafficking in mutants for the COPII gene Sec24b. Development 2010, 137:1067-1073. Together with Ref. [31], this paper shows that mice with inactivation of Sec24b have open neural tube because of defective Vangl2 targeting, providing a hint to selective trafic to assemble PCP signaling complexes at the plasma membrane. 33. Qu Y, Glasco DM, Zhou L, Sawant A, Ravni A, Fritzsch B, Damrau C, Murdoch J, Evans S, Pfaff SL, et al.: Atypical cadherins Celsr1-3 differentially regulate migration of facial branchiomotor neurons in mice. J Neurosci 2010, in press Authors show that inactivation of Celsr1 in progenitors affects the direction of migration of facial branchiomotor neurons, whereas inactivation of Celsr2 and 3 in these neurons shortens their caudal migration, thereby providing a first evidence of a dual PCP signaling system in nervous system. 34. Sittaramane V, Sawant A, Wolman MA, Maves L, Halloran MC, Chandrasekhar A: The cell adhesion molecule Tag1, transmembrane protein Stbm/Vangl2, and Lamininalpha1 exhibit genetic interactions during migration of facial branchiomotor neurons in zebrafish. Dev Biol 2009, 325:363-373. 35. Wada H, Tanaka H, Nakayama S, Iwasaki M, Okamoto H: Frizzled3a and Celsr2 function in the neuroepithelium to regulate migration of facial motor neurons in the developing zebrafish hindbrain. Development 2006, 133:4749-4759. 36. Shima Y, Kawaguchi SY, Kosaka K, Nakayama M, Hoshino M, Nabeshima Y, Hirano T, Uemura T: Opposing roles in neurite growth control by two seven-pass transmembrane cadherins. Nat Neurosci 2007, 10:963-969. 37. Tissir F, Bar I, Jossin Y, De Backer O, Goffinet AM: Protocadherin Celsr3 is crucial in axonal tract development. Nat Neurosci 2005, 8:451-457. 38. Zhou L, Bar I, Achouri Y, Campbell K, De Backer O, Hebert JM, Jones K, Kessaris N, de Rouvroit CL, O’Leary D et al.: Early forebrain wiring: genetic dissection using conditional Celsr3 mutant mice. Science 2008, 320:946-949. Using conditional Celsr3 mutant mice and several Cre expressing strains, this study shows that Clesr3-mediated interactions between growth cones of the growing axons and guidepost cells play essential roles in axonal guidance in mammals. 39. Tessier-Lavigne M: Wiring the brain: the logic and molecular mechanisms of axon guidance and regeneration. Harvey Lect 2002, 98:103-143. 40. Park TJ, Mitchell BJ, Abitua PB, Kintner C, Wallingford JB: Dishevelled controls apical docking and planar polarization of basal bodies in ciliated epithelial cells. Nat Genet 2008, 40:871879. In this article, authors used morpholino to downregulate Dishevelled1–3 in the frog epidermal cells and showed that these PCP proteins are required for ciliogenesis. 41. Tissir F, Qu Y, Montcouquiol M, Zhou L, Komatsu K, Shi D, Fujimori T, Labeau J, Tyteca D, Courtoy PJ et al.: Lack of cadherins Celsr2 and Celsr3 impair ependymal cilia development and function, leading to fatal hydrocephalus. Nat Neurosci 2010, 13:700-707. This study shows Celsr2 and Celsr3 cooperatively regulate ependymal ciliogenesis and ciliary function via a PCP-dependent mechanisms involving Fzd3 and Vangl2. 42. Guirao B, Meunier A, Mortaud S, Aguilar A, Corsi JM, Strehl L, Hirota Y, Desoeuvre A, Boutin C, Han YG et al.: Coupling between hydrodynamic forces and planar cell polarity orients mammalian motile cilia. Nat Cell Biol 2010, 12:341-350. www.sciencedirect.com Planar cell polarity signaling in neural development Tissir and Goffinet 577 43. Jones C, Roper VC, Foucher I, Qian D, Banizs B, Petit C, Yoder BK, Chen P: Ciliary proteins link basal body polarization to planar cell polarity regulation. Nat Genet 2008, 40:69-77. This study shows that the asymetric distribution of core PCP proteins precedes the polarized positioning of cilia in the cochlea, and that the partition of PCP complexes is not affected in cilia-defective Ift888 mutant mice. Altogether, Refs. [22,40,41,42,43] show that PCP signaling acts upstream of ciliogenesis in the inner ear, epidermis and ependyma. 44. Pak CW, Flynn KC, Bamburg JR: Actin-binding proteins take the reins in growth cones. Nat Rev Neurosci 2008, 9:136-147. 45. Fox JW, Lamperti ED, Eksioglu YZ, Hong SE, Feng Y, Graham DA, Scheffer IE, Dobyns WB, Hirsch BA, Radtke RA et al.: Mutations in filamin 1 prevent migration of cerebral cortical neurons in human periventricular heterotopia. Neuron 1998, 21:1315-1325. www.sciencedirect.com 46. Rosso SB, Sussman D, Wynshaw-Boris A, Salinas PC: Wnt signaling through Dishevelled. Rac and JNK regulates dendritic development. Nat Neurosci 2005, 8:34-42. 47. Azoury J, Lee KW, Georget V, Rassinier P, Leader B, Verlhac MH: Spindle positioning in mouse oocytes relies on a dynamic meshwork of actin filaments. Curr Biol 2008, 18:1514-1519. During meiosis, assymetry of division leads to polar body emission via positioning of the spindle close to the cell surface, an actin-dependent process. This paper shows that Formin 2 is required for the first meiotic spindle migration to the oocyte cortex in the mouse. 48. Habas R, Kato Y, He X: Wnt/Frizzled activation of Rho regulates vertebrate gastrulation and requires a novel Formin homology protein Daam1. Cell 2001, 107:843-854. Current Opinion in Neurobiology 2010, 20:572–577