* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download The basis of specific ligand recognition by proteins
Gel electrophoresis wikipedia , lookup
Transcriptional regulation wikipedia , lookup
Cell-penetrating peptide wikipedia , lookup
Molecular cloning wikipedia , lookup
Gene expression wikipedia , lookup
Gene regulatory network wikipedia , lookup
G protein–coupled receptor wikipedia , lookup
Cre-Lox recombination wikipedia , lookup
Silencer (genetics) wikipedia , lookup
History of molecular evolution wikipedia , lookup
Artificial gene synthesis wikipedia , lookup
Deoxyribozyme wikipedia , lookup
Size-exclusion chromatography wikipedia , lookup
Protein moonlighting wikipedia , lookup
Homology modeling wikipedia , lookup
Signal transduction wikipedia , lookup
Molecular evolution wikipedia , lookup
Biochemistry wikipedia , lookup
Multi-state modeling of biomolecules wikipedia , lookup
List of types of proteins wikipedia , lookup
Western blot wikipedia , lookup
Protein adsorption wikipedia , lookup
Nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy of proteins wikipedia , lookup
The basis of specific ligand recognition by proteins Goal Characterise the role of internal molecular dynamics (entropy) for binding and specificity in protein-DNA complexes through comparative database searches. Background Experimental structure determination by X-ray crystallography or NMR has provided many examples of high-resolution structures of complexes between proteins and drugs, DNA or simply other proteins [1]. However, what really determines binding specificity is still largely unknown, as the very limited success of drug design and protein modelling clearly shows. Many observations on proteins demonstrate the decisive role of water, internal molecular dynamics and entropy in general. Consider the following few examples: water molecules are essential elements in many macromolecular interfaces yet their residence times in these interfaces are in the nano- to microsecond range [2-3]; binding sites of proteins exhibit significant nanosecond mobility [4]; many enzymes could not work without sizeable motions of loops (opening/closing of active sites) [5]; finally, a growing number of proteins adopt a define 3D structure only when binding to a partner [6]. Project description Interfaces of molecular complexes with proteins exhibit significant and relevant mobility, also referred to as fluctuating networks of interactions; these often involve water molecules with very short residence times. The general problem of mobility will be addressed by specifically looking at interfaces between proteins and DNA, where the protein binds specifically to a certain DNA sequence (“reading” of DNA). Available experimental data from the PDB database [1] will be collected and compared (sequence and structure). Next, the conformational space for protein side chains that contact the DNA will be explored. Similarly, possible mobility of water molecules will be characterised with computer simulations (“molecular dynamics simulations”). The goal is to search for alternative protein-DNA interaction networks. Tthe outcome will be statistically analysed, e.g. by comparing the number of alternative interactions, lifetimes of interaction networks etc., and correlating these with binding strength and specificity. The final steps consist of an attempt to derive a model for DNA sequence specificity and to suggest experimental tests on this model. Project plan 1) Search the PDB for high-resolution protein-DNA complexes involving critical water molecules. 2) Structurally compare the protein-DNA interfaces both visually and in a quantitative manner. 3) Short molecular dynamics simulations on (selected) protein-DNA complexes. 4) Analysis of the above calculations. 5) Model description and suggestions for experimental tests; writing of thesis. Handledare Martin Billeter Biophysics Group, Department of Chemistry Email: [email protected] Phone: +46 (0)31 773 3925 Website: www.bcbp.gu.se/~martinb 1) Protein Data Bank (PDB): www.rcsb.org/pdb. 2) Billeter M, Güntert P, Luginbühl P & Wüthrich K, Cell 85, 1057-1065 (1996). 3) Gutmanas A & Billeter M, Proteins 57, 772-782 (2004). 4) Zhuravleva A, Korzhnev DM, Kupce E, Arseniev AS, Billeter M & Orekhov VY, J.Mol.Biol. 342, 1599-1611 (2004). 5) Hammes GG, Biochemistry 41,8221-8228 (2002). 6) Love JJ, Li X, Chung J, Dyson HJ & Wright P, Biochemistry 43, 8725-8734 (2004).