* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download Genetic Diversity of Rhizobium leguminosarum as Revealed
Genetically modified food wikipedia , lookup
Genetic studies on Bulgarians wikipedia , lookup
Gene therapy wikipedia , lookup
Gene expression programming wikipedia , lookup
Non-coding DNA wikipedia , lookup
Pharmacogenomics wikipedia , lookup
Genome evolution wikipedia , lookup
Quantitative trait locus wikipedia , lookup
Genetic drift wikipedia , lookup
Genetic code wikipedia , lookup
Therapeutic gene modulation wikipedia , lookup
Koinophilia wikipedia , lookup
Medical genetics wikipedia , lookup
Vectors in gene therapy wikipedia , lookup
Behavioural genetics wikipedia , lookup
Bisulfite sequencing wikipedia , lookup
Site-specific recombinase technology wikipedia , lookup
Heritability of IQ wikipedia , lookup
Pathogenomics wikipedia , lookup
Genome editing wikipedia , lookup
Genetic testing wikipedia , lookup
Population genetics wikipedia , lookup
Designer baby wikipedia , lookup
Public health genomics wikipedia , lookup
Artificial gene synthesis wikipedia , lookup
Metagenomics wikipedia , lookup
Genetic engineering in science fiction wikipedia , lookup
Genome (book) wikipedia , lookup
Genetic engineering wikipedia , lookup
Human genetic variation wikipedia , lookup
American-Eurasian J. Agric. & Environ. Sci., 13 (6): 797-801, 2013 ISSN 1818-6769 © IDOSI Publications, 2013 DOI: 10.5829/idosi.aejaes.2013.13.06.1969 Genetic Diversity of Rhizobium leguminosarum as Revealed by 16S rRNA Gene Sequence Mohamed Ismail, Abdelfattah M. El-Zanatay, Ragaa A. Eissa and Omar A. Hewedy Department of Genetics, Faculty of Agriculture, Minufiya University, Shibin El-Kom, Egypt Abstract: The genetic diversity of ten rhizobial isolates (Rhizobium leguminosarum) isolated from root nodules of broad beans (Vicia faba L.) growing in ten locations in Egypt were investigated using 16S rRNA gene partial sequence. The average genetic distance among the studied isolates was low (0.193) with the lowest genetic distance between isolates collected from South Sinai and Zefta and the highest genetic distance between North Sinai and Quesna isolates. The studied isolates formed two main groups based on cluster analyses and principal coordinate analysis. The grouping pattern of the isolates in both analyses was independent of their geographic location. Further, the isolation-by-distance analysis showed no correlation between genetic and geographic distance of the studied isolates (r = 0.118, p = 0.71). The present results suggested that the genetic diversity of Egyptian rhizobia across the studied locations is very low, probably due to the narrow genetic background of Egyptian rhizobia. Key words: Rhizobium leguminosarum 16S rRNA Vicia faba INTRODUCTION rhizobia provides valuable bioresource for the search of bacterial isolates in attempt to find isolates that maximize legume crop productivity [8]. Many techniques were developed and widely used to detect polymorphisms in many organisms including bacteria. Among these techniques, restriction fragment length polymorphisms (RFLP) and direct sequence of 16S rRNA genes, which have been used at both species and genera levels [4, 5, 9]. One of the most advantages of 16S rRNA region is that, it is highly conservative, hence, supports the well-established subdivision of rhizobia into species and genera [10]. The 16S rRNA gene sequencing previously used to detect potential novel taxa of new isolates [11]. Moreover, a longer fragment of the 16S rRNA gene (e.g., 800 bp) contains a conserved region that is sufficient to show the variation within groups of root nodule bacteria [12]. So, it is anticipated to infer the phylogenetic association among rhizobium isolates [13]. Additionally, the DNA sequence analysis of 16S rRNA region is a powerful tool in discriminating among strains and also known to exhibit a great deal of sequence and length variation [14]. In the current study we examine the genetic diversity of Rhizobium leguminosarum sampled from cultivated soil across ten locations in Egypt. Soil harbours different microorganisms characterized by high level of diversity. The diversity levels within bacteria are the highest, with approximately 50,000 bacterial species in one soil sample [1]. Rhizobia are soil bacteria which are capable of forming nitrogen-fixing symbiosis with different leguminous plants and have a significant role in nutrient cycling due to biological nitrogen fixation and enhancing crop productivity [2, 3]. These Rhizobia has an important role particularly in low-input sustainable agriculture and land reclamation [4], a typical situation of Egyptian agriculture. So, many of nodule-forming bacteria are of significant agricultural and ecological importance. The symbiosis relationships between rhizobia and leguminous plants provide rich soil for legumes cultivation. Many studies have addressed the diversity level of V. faba rhizobia; mainly focusing on rhizobial populations from the same location [5], or for comparison with Rhizobium leguminosarum isolates from other legume species [6]. It is important to understand the level of genetic diversity of Rhizobium species and how this affect soil fertility and crop productivity in response to agricultural practices and climate [7]. The diversity of Corresponding Author: Mohamed Ismail, Department of Genetics, Faculty of Agriculture, Minufiya University, Shibin El-Kom, Egypt. 797 Am-Euras. J. Agric. & Environ. Sci., 13 (6): 797-801, 2013 The major research questions were (i) whether the Egyptian rhizobia isolates are originated from the same genetic background and (ii) does close proximity geographic locations have similar rhizobia strains? used in PCR amplification and Big Dye Terminator v3.1 (ABI) in 3730x1 DNA analyzer (ABI) at Bioneer (Daejeon, Korea). Statistical Analysis Custer Analysis: Prior to statistical analysis, the ten sequences along with an out-group sequence (single sequence of R. leguminosarum obtained from NCBI database) were aligned and manually edited using BioEdit [17]. To determine the genetic relationship among the isolates, the number of base substitution per site among all sequences was obtained based on the Maximum Composite Likelihood method [18 as implemented in MEGA4 [19]. The phylogenetic tree was reconstructed based on Nei and Gojobori method [20] using unweighted pair group method with arithmetic mean (UPGMA) as implemented in MEGA4 [19]. The relative robustness of individual branches was estimated by bootstrapping [21], in which 1000 bootstrapped trees were generated from the resampled data. The phylogenetic tree was then plotted using Fig Tree 1.3.1 [22]. MATERIALS AND METHODS Isolation of Rhizobia: A total of ten rhizobium isolates were collected from ten fields from root nodules on broad bean (Vicia faba L.) plants. Rhizobium was isolated according to the methods described by Vincent [7]. The soil samples were collected from Quesna, Benha, Zefta, Beni Suef, South Sinai, Suez, North Sinai, Al-Minya, Al- Dakahlia and Cairo. These sites fall within four different agroecological zones in Egypt [15]; ranging between the Nile as a main source of water for irrigation (Quesna, Benha, Zefta, Beni Suef, Suez, Al-Minya and Al- Dakahlia) to rainfed lands (South Sinaiand North Sinai). Different broad bean verities were cultivated in these areas. Giza 3, Misr 1, Sakha 1 and Sakha 3 are common in Nile irrigated lands; however, Kassain and Nobaria are more common in rainfed lands. Principal Coordinates Analysis (PcoA): To further determine isolates grouping, the principal coordinate analysis (PCoA) was performed with GenAlex ver.6 [23]. This approach is complementary to cluster analysis where the latter is more sensitive to closely related species whereas PCoA is more prone to distances among related groups [24]. DNA Extraction: Total genomic DNA of each isolate was extracted from bacterial cultures grown in yeast extract mannitol media (YEM) until late exponential phase (109 cells mL 1). Extraction of DNA was performed using GeneJETâ„¢ Genomic DNA Purification kit (Fermentas, Vilnius, Lithuania) following manufacturer’s instructions. Samples were then diluted to 20 ng DNA µL 1 and kept at -20°C. Isolation-by-Distance: We tested for isolation-bydistance between rhizobia isolates. This method seeks to determine if there is a statistically significant relationship between genetic distance and geographic distance and (2) the strength of this relationship [25]. The correlation between genetic and geographic distance was assessed with Mantel test [26] with 1000 permutations as significant level using GenAlex ver.6 [23]. Amplification of 16S rRNA Gene: The DNA of each bacterial isolate was amplified with the universal primers, fD1 (5' AGAGTTTGATCCTGG CTCAG 3') and rP2 (5' ACG GCTACCTTGTTA CGACTT 3') as described in OtaTsuzuki et al. [16]. Polymerase chain reaction was performed in 50-µL reaction volume containing 100 ng DNA, 25 µL Maxima Hot Start PCR Master Mix (Fermentas, Lithuania) and 20 µM of forward and reverse primers. Amplifications were performed with the following PCR conditions: i) initial denaturation at 95°C for 10 min, ii) 35 cycles of 95°C for 30 s, 58°C for 1 min, 72°C for 1 min 30s and iii) 10 min final extension at 72°C. RESULTS Genetic Diversity of Rhizobia: Each Rhizobia isolate produced a single fragment ranging from 1000 base pairs (bp) to 850 bp. After sequence alignment and editing, an average of 835 bp fragment for each isolates was obtained. The genetic diversity was assessed as number of base pairs substitution per site among all studied isolates. The genetic distance among isolate pairs varied between 0 (South Sinai and Zefta) and 0.423 (between North Sinai and Quesna) with an average of 0.193 (Table 1). Partial 16S rRNA Gene Sequencing: Based on the PCR results, all ten isolates showed a single fragment amplification which were subsequently used for partial sequencing of the 16S rRNA gene. The 16S rRNA genes were sequenced from both strands using the same primers 798 Am-Euras. J. Agric. & Environ. Sci., 13 (6): 797-801, 2013 Table 1: Number of base substitution per site between 10 Rhizobium legumizarum isolates using Nei and Giobori method Quesna Benha Zefta Beni Suef South Sinai Suez North Sinai Al-Minya Al-Dakahlia Cairo Quesna Benha Zefta Beni Suef South Sinai Suez North Sinai Al-Minya Al-Dakahlia Cairo 0.000 0.258 0.26 0.029 0.259 0.290 0.423 0.234 0.019 0.058 0.000 0.163 0.211 0.163 0.188 0.298 0.152 0.223 0.216 0.000 0.217 0.000 0.034 0.305 0.05 0.229 0.211 0.000 0.216 0.246 0.366 0.193 0.009 0.022 0.000 0.034 0.304 0.050 0.228 0.21 0.000 0.303 0.069 0.259 0.247 0.000 0.273 0.381 0.371 0.000 0.204 0.195 0.000 0.033 0.000 Fig. 1: Phylogenetic relationship of 10 Rhizobium legumizarum isolates using UPGMA method. Number next to the branches represents bootstrap values Fig. 2: Two-dimensional representation of genetic relationships among 10 Rhizobium leguminosarum isolates determined on the basis of principal coordinates analysis of 16S rRNA gene sequence according to the first two principal coordinates (PC1 and PC2) 799 Am-Euras. J. Agric. & Environ. Sci., 13 (6): 797-801, 2013 analysis is presented in Fig. 1 supported this hypothesis where the groups did not correspond to geographic location. Similar pattern was previously reported by Yang and Zhou [27] where they found that rhizobia population in China probably originated from those of Japan and North America. The phylogenetic relationship (Fig. 2) showed that isolates from lower delta locations (Cairo, Quesna and Al-Dakahlia) formed one group in addition to isolate from Beni Suef which is about 224 kilometer (Km) from Al-Dakahlia. On the other hand, the grouping pattern of the remaining isolates was rather puzzling. Isolates from Zefta and South Sinai formed one group with 100% bootstrap support although they are located more than 400 km apart. Remarkably, isolates from North and South Sinai came in one group although they did not form an adjacent group. It is well-known that the highly conserved nature of the 16S rRNA gene sequence, the existence of similar genotypes or similar sequences in distantly separated location is expected under varying environmental conditions [6]. To further investigate grouping pattern of the studied rhizobia, we applied PCoA as another tool to assess such pattern from different prospective. The first and second PCoA axis explained 75% of the variation within the sequence data (Fig. 2) which represent reasonable coverage of the total variation. These results showed a stronger, yet similar, pattern of grouping compared to cluster analysis. However, the grouping pattern was irrespective to the isolates geographic locations. To assess the relationship between genetic and geographic an isolation-by-distance test was used to decipher if the genetic distance independent of geographic distance. As expected, no correlation between genetic distance and geographic distance was observed, supporting the notion of single origin of Egyptian rhizobia. The presence of recombination within and between ribosomal genes has been documented [12], which might be involved in the Egyptian rhizobia genetic homogeneity. Fig. 3: Correlation between genetic distance (base substitution per site) and geographic distance (km) of 10 Rhizobium legumizarum isolates. Cluster analysis revealed two main clusters (Figure 1). The first cluster included isolates from Zefta, South Sinai, Suez, Al-Minya, Benha and North Sinai; whereas the second cluster included isolates from Cairo, Beni Suef, Quesna and Al- Dakahlia. Principal coordinates analysis showed similar pattern as cluster analysis. The first and second principal coordinates explained 50.14% and 26.64% of the variation within isolates, respectively (Fig. 2). The studied isolates formed two distinct groups, the first group included isolates from Zefta, South Sinai, Suez, Al-Minya, Benha and North Sinai; whereas, the second group included isolates from Cairo, Beni Suef, Quesna and Al- Dakahlia. Remarkably, the isolates within each group were overlapped except North Sinain and Benha isolates were distinct from other isolates in the second group (Fig. 2). The results of mantel test indicated a week correlation between genetic and geographical distance (Fig. 3, r = 0.118, p = 0.71). DISCUSSION REFERENCES The range of base pair substitution per site among isolates was quite narrow (0% - 42%, Table 1), this probably associated with two factors; first the 16S rRNA gene sequence is highly conserved, hence a limited sequence variability is expected even among distant isolates and, second; the studied isolates probably has originated from the same genetic background and the human activities (e.g., transferring plants, soils, trading) have played the major role in intermixing rhizobia strains in Egypt. The presence of two main groups in the cluster 1. 2. 800 Roesch, L.F., R.R. Fulthorpe, A. Riva, G. Casella, et al., 2007. Pyrosequencing enumerates and contrasts soil microbial diversity. ISME J., 1: 283-290. Stocker, R., J.R. Seymour, A. Samadani and D.E. Hunt, 2008. Rapid chemotactic response enables marine bacteria to exploit ephemeral microscale nutrient patches. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 105: 4209-4214. Am-Euras. J. Agric. & Environ. Sci., 13 (6): 797-801, 2013 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. Toro, M., R. Azcon and J. Barea, 1997. Improvement of arbuscular mycorrhiza development by inoculation of soil with phosphate-solubilizing rhizobacteria to improve rock phosphate bioavailability ((sup32)P) and nutrient cycling. Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 63: 4408-4412. Romdhane, S.B., H. Nasr, R. Samba-Mbaye and M. Neyra, 2006. Genetic diversity of Acacia tortilis ssp. raddiana rhizobia in Tunisia assessed by 16S and 16S-23S rDNA genes analysis. J. Appl. Microbiol., 100: 436-445. Laguerre, G., M.R. Allard, F. Revoy and N. Amarger, 1994. Rapid identification of rhizobia by restriction fragment genes. Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 60: 56-63. Moreira, F.M.S., K. Haukka and J.P.W. Young, 1987. Biodiversity of rhizobia isolated from a wide range of forest legumes in Brazil. Mol. Ecol., 7: 889-895. Smalla, K., M. Oros-Sichler, A. Milling, H. Heuer, Baumgarte et al., 2007. Bacterial diversity of soils assessed by DGGE, T-RFLP and SSCP fingerprints of PCR-amplified 16S rRNA gene fragments: Do the different methods provide similar results? J. Microbiol. Meth., 69: 470-479. Binde, D.R., P. Menna, E.V. Bangel, F.G. Barcellos, et al., 2009. rep-PCR fingerprinting and taxonomy based on the sequencing of the 16S rRNA gene of 54 elite commercial rhizobial strains. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol., 83: 897-908. Lafay, B. and J.J. Burdon, 2001. Small-subunit rRNA genotyping of rhizobia nodulating Australian Acacia spp. Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 67: 396-402. Sun, G.L., M. William, J. Liu, K.J. Kasha and K.P. Pauls, 2001. Microsatellite and RAPD polymorphisms in Ontario corn hybrids are related to the commercial sources and maturity ratings. Mol. Breed., 7: 13-24. Heyndrickx, M., L. Vauterin, P. Vandamme, K. Kersters et al., 1996. Application of combined amplified ribosomal DNA restriction analysis (ARDRA) patterns in bacterial phylogeny and taxonomy. J. Microbiol. Methods., 26: 247-259. Wolde-meskel, E., Z. Terefework, A. Frostegard and K. Lindstrom, 2005. Genetic diversity and phylogeny of rhizobia isolated from agroforestry legume species in southern Ethiopia. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol., 55: 1439-1452. Bala, A., P. Murphy and K.E. Giller, 2003. Distribution and diversity of rhizobia nodulating agroforestry legumes in soils from three continents in the tropics. Mol. Ecol., 12: 917-930. 801 14. Mutch, L.A. and JP.W. Young, 2004. Diversity and specificity of Rhizobium leguminosarum Biovar viciaeon wild and cultivated legumes. Mol. Ecol., 13: 2435-2444. 15. FAO: Fertilizer use by crop in Egypt, 2005. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome, http://www.fao.org/docrep/008/y5863e/ y5863e00.HTM. 16. Ota-Tsuzuki, C., A.T.P. Brunheira and M.P.A. Mayer, 2008. 16S rRNA Region Based PCR protocol for identification and subtyping of Parvimonas micra. Braz. J. Microbiol., 39: 605-607. 17. Hall, T.A., 1999. BioEdit: a user-friendly biological sequence alignment editor and analysis program for Windows 95/98/NT. Nucl. Acids Symp. Ser., 41: 95-98. 18. Tamura, K., M. Nei and S. Kumar, 2004. Prospects for inferring very large phylogenies by using the neighbor-joining method. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 101: 11030-11035. 19. Tamura, K., J. Dudley, M. Nei and S. Kumar, 2007. MEGA4: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis (MEGA) software version 4.0. Mol. Biol. Evol., 24: 1596-1599. 20. Nei, M. and T. Gojobori, 1986. Simple methods for estimating the numbers of synonymous and nonsynonymous nucleotide substitutions. Mol. Biol. Evol., 3: 418-426. 21. Felesenstein, J., 1985. Confidence limits on phylogenies with a molecular clock. Syst. Zoology, 34: 152-161. 22. Rambaut, A., 2009. FigTree, ver. 1.3.1. [Online]. Available: http:// tree.bio.ed.ac.uk/software/figtree/ [2012, June 21]. 23. Peakall, R. and P.E. Smouse, 2006. GenAlEx 6: genetic analysis in Excel. Population genetic software for teaching and research. Mol. Ecol. Notes., 6: 288-295. 24. Hauser, L.A. and T.J. Crovello, 1982. Numerical analysis of genetic relationships in Thelypodiae (Brassicaceae). Sys. Bot., 7: 249-268. 25. Bohonak, A.J., 2002. IBD (Isolation By Distance): a program for analyses of isolation by distance. J. Hered., 93: 153-154. 26. Mantel, N., 1967. The detection of disease clustering and a generalized regression approach. Cancer Res., 27: 209-220. 27. Yang, J.K. and J.C. Zhou, 2008. Diversity, phylogeny and host specificity of soybean and peanut bradyrhizobia. Biol. Fertil. Soils., 44: 843-851.