Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Cytokinesis wikipedia , lookup
Extracellular matrix wikipedia , lookup
Cell growth wikipedia , lookup
Tissue engineering wikipedia , lookup
Cellular differentiation wikipedia , lookup
Cell encapsulation wikipedia , lookup
Programmed cell death wikipedia , lookup
Organ-on-a-chip wikipedia , lookup
Cell culture wikipedia , lookup
J. Cell Sci. 14, 475-497 (i974) Printed in Great Britain 475 THE PROCESS OF SELECTION OF ERYTHROMYCIN-RESISTANT MITOCHONDRIA BY ERYTHROMYCIN IN PARAMECIUM R. PERASSO Laboratoire de Biologie Cellulaire IV AND A. ADOUTTE* Laboratoire de Ge'ne'tique, Universite Paris XI, Centre d'Orsay, 91405, France SUMMARY Mitochondrial mutations conferring erythromycin resistance (E E ) are available in Paramecium and it is possible to obtain (by conjugation and cytoplasmic exchange) exconjugant cells containing a majority of wild-type erythromycin-sensitive (E s ) mitochondria and a minority of E11 ones. In the presence of erythromycin, such 'mixed' cells progressively become resistant. This process of acquisition of resistance has been studied cytologically (on thin sections of single cells) and genetically (by evaluating, on the basis of previous data, the proportion of E " / E s mitochondrial genomes at various times). While at early stages of the process of transformation the whole mitochondrial population appears rather homogeneous, at later stages, (i.e. when the cell has resumed growth in the antibiotic-containing medium) one finds, side by side, both resistant-looking mitochondria (structurally normal) and sensitive-looking ones, showing the typical alterations induced in E s cells by erythromycin. Conversely, a progressive decrease in the number of E s genomes can be demonstrated. The complete genetical and cytological transformation from erythromycin sensitivity to erythromycin resistance can occur after less than three fissions in erythromycin-containing medium. The results indicate that intensive selective multiplication of E R mitochondria occurs, under the pressure of erythromycin, virtually in the absence of cellular division. The possibility of dissociating mitochondrial division from cell division emphasizes the extent of mitochondrial autonomy. INTRODUCTION Mutations conferring resistance to erythromycin have been isolated in Paramecium aurelia and shown to be located in mitochondrial DNA (Beale, 1969; Adoutte & Beisson, 1970; Beale, Knowles & Tait, 1972). In the course of the genetical analysis of these mutations the following observations have been made. After conjugation between an erythromycin-sensitive (Es) and an erythromycin-resistant cell (ER), if cytoplasmic exchange has occurred, the sensitive ex-conjugant harbours a majority of E s mitochondria and a minority of E R ones. When such a cell is placed in erythromycin-containing medium (ERY) it first behaves like a sensitive cell: its multiplication * Present address: Centre de Gen6tique Moleculaire, CNRS, 91190 Gif-sur-Yvette, France. 476 R. Perasso and A. Adoutte is blocked; but after a lag of 2-4 days, it becomes progressively resistant and resumes growth. This lag has been interpreted as reflecting the selective multiplication of the E R mitochondria until their number has become sufficient to allow the cells to resume growth (Adoutte & Beisson, 1970). A detailed genetical and cytological analysis of this process of transformation from erythromycin-sensitivity to erythromycin-resistance was carried out on the basis of the two following facts, previously established: (1) Erythromycin exerts profound effects on the structure of mitochondria in E s strains of Paramecium (disappearance of cristae, appearance of rigid plates, etc.) whereas the mitochondria of E R strains remain little or not at all affected (Adoutte, Balmefrezol, Beisson & Andre, 1972). It could thus be hoped that a distinction would be possible between E R and E s mitochondria within a mixed cell placed in erythromycin. (2) When a mixed cell (containing E R and E s mitochondria) is grown in the absence of antibiotic, E s mitochondria show a selective advantage over E R ones. Even if the initial number of E s mitochondria is low in the original cell, after a number of cell generations, no E R mitochondria can be detected: all the cells in the clone become pure sensitives. This evolution towards sensitivity follows reproducible kinetics which are a function of the relative proportion of the 2 types of mitochondria in the original mixed cell and of the genotype of the mitochondria confronted. We have established, for instance that after 20-25 fissions in non-selective medium, a cell containing 50% E R mitochondria and 50 % E s mitochondria produces progeny in which no E R mitochondria can be detected, whereas 35-40 generations are needed in E]^,2 + E s combinations (Adoutte & Beisson, 1972). We thus have a means of roughly evaluating the proportion of resistant mitochondria in a mixed cell, at any chosen time, by placing the cell in nonselective medium and determining the stage at which the clone obtained gives rise to pure sensitive cells. This paper describes in parallel the genetical and cytological evolution in ERYof the progeny of mixed cells obtained after conjugation and cytoplasmic exchange between a wild-type (Es) strain and either a moderately (ER) or a strongly (E}^2) resistant strain. An abstract of this work has been published in J. Microscopie, 1972, 14, 78 a. An analogous situation has been studied cytologically by Knowles (1972); in this case the E R mitochondria were introduced into sensitive cells by a microinjection technique. MATERIAL AND METHODS Strains The strains described below have been used. Es is the wild-type strain of Paramecium aurelia, stock d 4-2, syngen 4, sensitive to erythromycin. The cells of this strain are unable to multiply in the presence of 100 /<g/ml of erythromycin. E? and Ef02, are two erythromycin-resistant strains isolated from the wild-type strain. Strain Ef is moderately resistant to erythromycin: the cells undergo approximately 3 fissions/ day in the presence of 100 /tg/ml erythromycin. Strain EJ'O2 is highly resistant: the cells undergo 4-5 fissions/day in 100 fig/ml erythromycin, which is equivalent to the growth rate of all 3 strains Selection of mitochondria in Paramecium in the absence of antibiotic. Mitochondria in Ef cells placed in ERY show slight ultrastructural alterations, whereas mitochondria in EK02 cells placed in ERY are not at all affected (Adoutte et al. 1972). Media Media and culture conditions have already been described (Sonneborn, 1970; Adoutte & Beisson, 1970); cells were cultured in a 'Scotch Grass' infusion bacterized with Aerobacter aerogenes. Suitable volumes of a concentrated erythromycin stock solution were added to this bacterized medium to reach a concentration of 100 fig/m\ of erythromycin. This concentration of erythromycin in the culture medium was used as the selective medium (ERY) throughout the experiments. Crosses Crosses have been carried out in the usual way (Sonneborn, 1970; Adoutte & Beisson, 1970). From a great number of pairs isolated, those that remained united by a cytoplasmic bridge after fertilization were selected for study. The presence of this bridge indicates that cytoplasm, including mitochondria, has been exchanged between the mates. The bridges are usually transient (5 to 20 min in the cases studied). It is known that the amount of mitochondria exchanged between conjugants is, roughly, a function of the persistence of the cytoplasmic bridge (Adoutte & Beisson, 1970). Tests for genetic purification Protocol. Starting with a mixed cell and growing it in normal medium, the number of cell generations necessary to reach the stage where all the cells will be Es is an indication of the initial proportion of resistant mitochondria present in the mixed cell. In order to ascertain when the progeny of a mixed cell no longer contained ER mitochondria the cell was placed in normal medium; after 10 fissions a sample of 3-30 cells was tested in ERY to discover whether they contained E" mitochondria and hence were able to grow and 3 cells were subcloned individually in normal medium. The 3 subclones were grown for 10 new fissions, tested and subcloned again, only one cell being subcloned for each of the 3 clones, etc. . .. For each mixed cell studied, starting from the 10th fission, 2 sub-clones were thus maintained for a large number of generations in normal medium and tested every 10 fissions. Definition of the various types of cells. It is possible to estimate the number of EB mitochondria in a mixed cell using a formula reported by Preer (1948). In the present paper we do not attempt a precise estimation of the composition of mixed cells but only distinguish the following 5 convenient classes, defined experimentally: (1) pure EB cells, with 100% EH mitochondria. These never give rise to sensitive cells. In some cases the tests have been carried out up to the 140th generation in normal medium. (2) Highly enriched cells. These start giving rise to cells lacking E" mitochondria only after at least 20 generations in normal medium, for the EJ1 mitochondria, or 30-40 generations, for the E1'O2 mitochondria. (3) Moderately enriched cells. These give rise to 100 % E" cells after 10 generations in normal medium and start giving rise to cells lacking EB mitochondria after about 15 generations in normal medium (for EB mitochondria), or 25 generations (for the EB02 mitochondria). (4) Weakly enriched cells. Sensitive cells appear as early as the 10th generation in normal medium. And (5) purely sensitive cells, with 0% ER mitochondria. No resistant cells appear, whatever the stage at which the cells are tested. By comparison with the results obtained for cells containing 50 % EB and 50 % Es mitochondria (Adoutte & Beisson, 1972) it can be very roughly estimated that the proportion of E B mitochondria is 75-90 % in highly enriched cells, 25-75 % m moderately enriched cells, and 1-25 % in weakly enriched cells. Electron microscopy All studies have been carried out on single cells. Each cell was fixed in 2 % glutaraldehyde in 0-05 M cacodylate buffer, pH 7^3, at 4 °C for 30 min, washed rapidly several times in the same buffer and postfixed for 1 h in 2 % osmium tetroxide in the same buffer. After a brief washing R. Perasso and A. Adoutte 47 8 the cell was embedded in a i-mm cube of i % agar. The cube thus obtained was dehydrated in ethanol and propylene oxide and embedded in Epon. Sections were cut on an OmU2 ultramicrotome equipped with a diamond knife. They were recovered on grids coated with a Parlodion membrane and contrasted with uranyl acetate and lead citrate. Observations were carried out in a Siemens Elmiskop IA electron microscope. RESULTS Altogether 9 pairs have been studied both genetically and cytologically (3 from the Ef x E s cross, 6 from E ^ x E s cross) and 14 pairs genetically only (all from the Ef x E s cross). After conjugation and cytoplasmic exchange had occurred and the pairs had separated the ex-conjugants were isolated individually and placed in ERY either immediately (EJ^2 * Es) or after having undergone one fission in normal medium (E? x Es). 1 day 2 days 3 days 5 days in ERY 4 days 14a >100 cells oo0ooo 0 QQ Q0 Er, x E s pair 14 "\>=# 14b Fig. 1. The development of pair 14. The exact number of cells has been drawn except when stated. Heavy arrows indicate that a cell has been removed for EM study, the cell being referred to, in the text and on figures, by a number (14a, 14b, . . .). Light arrows indicate that a cell has been removed and placed back in normal medium to study the extent of its genetic purification. In all cases, the E R ex-conjugant grew normally in the presence of erythromycin whereas the E s ex-conjugant underwent 2 or 3 residual fissions before fissions were blocked for 2-4 days. During this period the E s cells first displayed the E s phenotype (dark, slow swimming), then progressively acquired an E R phenotype (clear, rapid swimming), and finally resumed growth. In the course of this development, some cells were taken for EM observation, others for study of the extent of genetic purification reached, that is the proportions of E R and E s mitochondria they contained. All the pairs showed a roughly similar development. That of pair No. 14 from the E R x E s cross (Fig. 1) can be considered as representative. The cytological results on 20 72 79 35 10 25 20-2j 15 : 50 1-15 I\, \ 3 69 36 2-3 2-3 3-4 .3 3 : 3 4 1-2 3 2 3 4 + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + I [ 4 - ++I- 10 I , 2 Days in ERY 3 j-6 : 4-5 5 3-4 ? 4 I 3 2-3 4 1-12 14 Generations in ERY 30 + + + + + + 1: f 1; i + +;+ + + + + + + +I+ + + + + . + + + + - 20 + + + + + + + + + + + - - - + +I--. jo + + + + + + + + + + 60 + + + + + + + + + + 70 + + + + + + + +I+ + + 80 + + + + + + + + loo - - + + + + + + + + IIO ++ + + + + + + + + . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ... 140 + } 120 PureR PureR High PureR PureR Pure R High High PureR Nil Weak Moderate High Moderate Moderate Moderate Moderate Moderate High High (or pure R) High chondria Enrichment , in ER mito- indicates that all tested cells are ER, -, that tions (see Material and methods). 1 - , that the all are E"; 1 - , that approximately half were ER and half ES; majority were ER, 1 - - that the majority were ES. When the different subclones yielded different results they have been fully represented (e.g. No. 67). I n pair No. 4, 6 cells (out of 13)in process of transformation were analysed. + + + + + + + ++I++I- +I- - - - + 40 Results of the genetical purification tests, fissions T h e column ' Generations in ERY' indicates the stage at which cells in process of transformation in ERY medium have been removed and placed back in normal medium. Number of generations such as 2-3 indicate that some cells of the clone have not yet gone through the 3rd fission (e.g. j,6 or 7 cells present). For the tests of genetical purification 3-30 cells are tested in ERY every 1 0genera- EP~,x E~ E: x E~ Cross No. of pair Duration of cytoplasmic bridge, min Table r . The enrichment of ES cells in ER mitochondria as a function of time and number of generations in erythromycin-containing medium \O P h 1. 2 2 2 ' s. % % s % 3 2 $. Fd 2 480 R. Perasso and A. Adoutte this pair are presented in Figs. 4-10. The genetical results are summarized in Table 1. The method of numbering the cells is indicated on Fig. 1. 1st day. Cell 14a (Fig. 4). After 24 h in ERY the first mitochondrial alterations appear: beginning with loss of cristae, reduction of mitochondrial diameter and increase in mitochondrial length, irregularity in the contours of some mitochondria. These alterations are characteristic effects of ERY on sensitive mitochondria (Adoutte et al. 1972). A sister cell of 14 a was placed in normal medium and yielded a clone (1 o generations) from which 15 cells were tested and were found to be sensitive. This result indicates that the cell did not contain significant amounts of E R mitochondria (<^ 25%). No significant increase in E R mitochondria has thus occurred in the cells derived from the sensitive exconjugant of this pair after 24 h in ERY. As a control, cell 14b (Fig. 5), derived from the E R ex-conjugant of the same pair, contains a relatively 'healthy' mitochondrial population. The slight mitochondrial alterations detectable (slight decrease in cristae, irregular contours) are typical of the E R mutant which is only moderately resistant (Adoutte et al. 1972). 2nd day. Cell 14a! (Fig. 6). After 2 days in ERY, the mitochondrial alterations are increased in cells derived from the sensitive ex-conjugant just as in purely sensitive cells. Cristae disappear in most mitochondria, but when still present they display a wavy configuration. The matrix becomes denser and some plates begin to appear. Mitochondria are more elongated and more slender, some even collapse. No 'resistantlooking' mitochondria are yet observable. Although this cell looks cytologically like a pure sensitive one, one of its sister cells is already enriched in E R mitochondria; indeed at this stage, after 10fissionsin normal medium, the sister cell yielded 20 resistant cells out of 27 tested cells, but all 30 cells tested after 20 fissions were sensitive. Increase of E R mitochondria has thus begun between stages 14a and i4a x (see Fig. 1); the proportion of E R mitochondria must have been small because they were overgrown by E s ones after only 20 fissions in normal medium. Cells from the clone derived from the resistant conjugant still retain nearly normal mitochondria (Fig. 7). Sensitive-looking mitochondria coming from the E s partner have never been observed in these cells. \th day. Cell 1483 (Fig. 8). The sensitive ex-conjugant has now undergone 3-4 fissions in ERY and the cells are slowly resuming a normal growth rate. The mitochondrial population assumes a much ' healthier' aspect, in contrast with what can be observed in a purely sensitive cell, taken as a control, in which alterations have become quite dramatic (Fig. 9). Three types of mitochondria can be observed in cell i4a 3 : (1) Clearly sensitive looking mitochondria with a dense matrix and very few or no cristae. (2) Normal, resistant-looking mitochondria (clear matrix, abundant cristae and mitochondrial ribosomes). The shape of these mitochondria is, however, irregular and some pictures suggest a budding process (Fig. 11). And (3) Intermediate-type mitochondria. These resemble resistant mitochondria by their clear matrix and sensitive mitochondria by the wavy arrangement of their cristae. Three sister cells of cell 1483 were cloned in normal medium. Two of them were Selection of mitochondria in Paramecium K 481 shown to be moderately enriched in E mitochondria and the third highly enriched. Thus, the genetical enrichment in E K mitochondria has progressed since stage 14 a! but it is clear that the cells are not yet pure E R (Table 1). At the same stage the cells issued from the resistant ex-conjugant retain normal mitochondria. In summary, the cytological as well as genetical evolution in ERY of the ex-sensitive conjugant of pair 14 displays 3 stages: (1) slight enrichment in E R genetic determinants without notable modification of the sensitive aspect of the mitochondrial population; (2) considerable genetical enrichment in E R determinants correlated with the appearance of numerous resistant-looking mitochondria; and (3) rapid genetical purification associated with the acquisition of a homogeneous resistant mitochondrial population, after cells have resumed growth. With some variations, the process described for pair No. 14 has been observed for all the pairs of the Ef x E s cross. Genetical results for some other pairs are reported in Table 1. It can be seen that, as the number of fissions (or number of days) in ERY increases, cells of sensitive origin are increasingly enriched in ERmitochondria, but they are not yet purely E R after 4 fissions in ERY since they can still yield sensitive cells if grown for numerous fissions in normal medium. At late stages (5-6 fissions), some sensitive mitochondria have exceptionally been observed among a vast majority of resistant mitochondria (Fig. 12, part of a cell from pair No. 36, that has resumed normal growth in ERY slightly earlier than 14a). The distinction between the 2 types of mitochondria is very striking under these conditions. At this stage most cells behave as genetically pure E R (pair No. 3, Table 1). In the E{^2 x E s combination, the important fact emerging is the greater rapidity of transformation from E s to E R . This is observable genetically as well as cytologically. The development of pairs 69 and 72 is shown schematically in Figs. 2 and 3. The genetic data for these 2 representative pairs and some others are recorded in Table i, and the cytological data in Figs. 12 and 13. In the case of pair No. 72, the progeny of the sensitive ex-conjugant behaved genetically as purely resistant after fewer than 3fissionsin ERY. The population of mitochondria in a cell of the same clone observed in the EM after 2fissionsin ERY already is nearly pure for resistant characteristics (Fig. 12); only 1 out of 20 mitochondria shows sensitive characteristics. In addition some mitochondria show a curious 'mosaic' condition: one part having resistant characteristics while another shows sensitive ones (collapsed extremities and engulfed glycogen). In the case of pair No. 69, the cell tested genetically after 1 or 2 fissions (3 cells present) in ERY is already enriched in resistant mitochondria (Table 1). At this stage it is difficult to classify mitochondria cytologically as sensitive or resistant. At the next test (after 3fissionsin ERY), of the 2 cells studied genetically, one is purely resistant, the other is very highly enriched for E K mitochondria. In good agreement with these observations we observe a large majority of resistant-looking mitochondria and a minority of sensitive-looking ones, the discrimination between the 2 types being now very clear (Fig. 13). The steps of acquisition of erythromycin-resistance thus appear to be analogous in R. Perasso and A. Adoutte 482 1 day 3 days 2 days 72b, ERY 00 72b, 00 2S-30 cells 72a 5 days in ERY 4 days 00 0...16-20 "fy/V >100 cells cells '"'[•' >100 cells pair 72 72a, Fig. 2. The development of pair No. 72 (same conventions as in Fig. 1). 1 day 2 days tlost 3 days 69b, 4 days 5 days in ERY 69b,, 69b,2 -On— 00 00 •••"•.••v-";- > i o o cells Er x E ! pair 69 c >100 cells 102 x c Fig. 3. The development of pair No. 69 (same conventions as in Fig. 1). the 2 combinations studied, the events being accelerated in the case of the highly resistant mutant Ef-02. This is so even when the ex-conjugants in the E}Q2 X E S cross are allowed to undergo one fission in normal medium before being placed in ERY as was the case in the Ej1 x E s combination. The differences between the 2 types of crosses are therefore due only to the different levels of resistance of the 2 types of E R mitochondria studied. Selection of mitochondria in Paramecium 483 DISCUSSION Validity of the results This work has consisted of analysing both genetically and cytologically the acquisition of erythromycin-resistance by sensitive cells. Of course, it is not the identical cell which is studied in the EM and analysed genetically. Furthermore, can one be sure that the two cells which are taken for testing from the clone in the process of transformation, are representative of all the cells of the clone? These questions raise the same problem: are all cells of a clone in the process of transformation identical and thus can the results obtained on one of them be extended to the others? Several lines of evidence, cited below, indicate that this is indeed the case. When several cells have been isolated from a clone in process of transformation and the extent of genetic purification determined the results are fairly uniform (e.g. pairs No. 3 and 69 in Table 1). When two cells from the same clone are observed in the electron microscope, they are found to be strikingly similar. In the E' 1 x E s cross, the sensitive ex-conjugant had undergone onefissionin normal medium and the two resulting cells were then transferred independently into ERY. It was observed that these two cells followed exactly the same evolution in ERY, becoming resistant after the same lag. This means that they contain approximately the same proportion of E R mitochondria, since the lag in ERY is closely linked to the proportion of E R mitochondria harboured by the mixed cell (Adoutte & Beisson, 1970). Thus the mitochondria derived from those transferred from the E R conjugant have been distributed in approximately equal numbers to the two cells derived from the E s conjugant. Finally, it was already known that, in normal medium, mixed cells yield clones the cells of which are very similar in their mitochondrial population (Adoutte & Beisson, I972). All these observations suggest that there is an intense mixing of mitochondria in paramecium; added to the fact that the cells divide by binary fission, this leads to a great cytoplasmic similarity between the cells of a clone. The facts A number of clear cut facts emerge from this study. The first concerns the rapidity of the process of transformation, especially when the E{Q2 strain is used. Sensitive cells, into which a minority of E$,2 mitochondria are introduced (less than 10%), become purely erythromycin-resistant, genetically and cytologically, after 3 or fewer generations in ERY. (It must be noted that the number of generations necessary to reach genetic purification is probably overestimated since the first 2 fissions in ERY medium are residual fissions, carried out even by purely sensitive cells.) Thus an active multiplication of E H mitochondrial genomes must have occurred along with an active synthesis of the products of these genomes conferring the resistant phenotype to mitochondria, while practically no cell divisions were occurring. Secondly, there is a very good parallelism between the extent of purification of the %2 C E L 14 484 R- Perasso and A. Adoutte R cells in E determinants, as determined genetically, and their cytological aspect. In particular, when a cell is denned as purely resistant cytologically it is also purely resistant genetically and vice versa. This indicates that mitochondria that are genetically E s but phenotypically E R do not exist, at least in notable amounts. These two comments apply quite well to cells 72b, which have undergone only 2 fissions in ERY since conjugation. However, they already are purely resistant cytologically and genetically. It must be noted that if a simple dilution of the E s mitochondria had occurred one would expect to find one quarter of them in the 72 b cell, while practically none are found. This result suggests that, in addition to the active multiplication of E R genomes, active elimination of the sensitive mitochondria has occurred. This elimination is observed only during the process of acquisition of resistance since it is known that purely sensitive cells can remain in erythromycin for as long as 7 days and still be able to resume growth when put back into normal medium. In this case no irreversible destruction of all the sensitive mitochondria has occurred. The complete elimination of E s mitochondria then appears to be linked to active processes occurring during the acquisition of resistance. Thirdly, cytological discrimination between sensitive and resistant mitochondria is difficult at early stages of the acquisition of resistance. At intermediate stages (2-3 days) a range of mitochondrial phenotypes is observed. It is only when cells have become practically pure E R that one can distinguish clearly sensitive from resistant mitochondria, lying sometimes side by side. Finally, it appears that cells of sensitive origin resume growth in ERY at a normal rate only when they have reconstituted the totality of their mitochondrial population (both cytologically and genetically). Interpretations The central question in this study is the mechanism of acquisition of erythromycinresistance. At least two mechanisms can be proposed, as already suggested by Knowles (1972). 1. Multiplication of the resistant mitochondria that have initially penetrated into the sensitive cell, along with the degeneration of the sensitive mitochondria (with possible reutilization of some elements recovered from the sensitive mitochondria for the building of the resistant ones). 2. Multiplication of the initially resistant mitochondria along with genetic transformation of E s mitochondria by E R DNA, a possibility raised by the discovery of mitochondrial recombination in yeast (Thomas & Wilkie, 1968; Bolotin et al. 1971) and the preliminary evidence for analogous events obtained in Paramecium (Adoutte, 1973)The EM pictures do not allow discrimination between these 2 possibilities. Although we have noticed in several instances images suggesting division of resistant mitochondria by elongation and constriction as appears to be the case in normal cells (J. Beisson & R. Perasso, in preparation), the cytological situation is not simple, since during the intermediate phase, 3 types of mitochondria can be recognized: (1) Selection of mitochondria in Paramecium 485 clearly resistant-looking; (2) clearly sensitive-looking and (3) a range difficult to classify, often closer to sensitive types (for instance with wavy or few cristae) but not as altered as expected for sensitive mitochondria (i.e. without dense matrix or reduced diameter, etc... .). These mitochondria could correspond to sensitive mitochondria in the process of transformation towards resistance as postulated by the second hypothesis. It is important to note, however, that we are not dealing with purely sensitive cells, and that sensitive mitochondria may appear less affected precisely because they are in the vicinity of resistant mitochondria. One can imagine either direct interactions between mitochondria (exchange of products) bringing some 'relief to sensitive mitochondria, or, more likely, indirect interactions resulting from the fact that the intracellular environment is more 'normal' in a cell in the course of transformation then in a purely sensitive cell. The great rapidity of purification observed with mutant E^ 2 could appear to favour the hypothesis of complete transformation of sensitive mitochondria into resistant ones. Sensitive mitochondria would be disappearing rapidly not because they are degenerating rapidly but because they are rapidly transformed into resistant ones. It must be noted however that we are dealing with a rapid phenomenon in terms of cell generations; it is not rapid in time. Cells do not become purely resistant in less than 48 h. Assuming that a few tens resistant mitochondria pass from the resistant to the sensitive conjugant and that they multiply exponentially at the rate of one fission every 6 h (generation time of Paramecium), 48 h are enough to produce from them the several thousand mitochondria per cell. Finally a process of reutilization of elements, at least, from the sensitive mitochondria, may occur, to account for their very rapid cytological disappearance (in the case of mutant EJ*02). The details of this process are unknown. In particular we never observed organelles analogous to the cytolysomes seen engulfing and digesting mitochondria when cells of Tetrahymena are starved (Nillson, 1970). On the whole, then, the process of acquisition of resistance appears to involve multiplication of resistant mitochondria, but the occurrence, in addition, of transformation of sensitive mitochondria into resistant ones remains a possibility. CONCLUSIONS Whatever mechanism one favours for the interpretation of the acquisition of resistance, one thing is clear. There must occur an active multiplication of resistant genomes, while the cells are dividing slowly or not at all. This appears to be one important conclusion of this study since it implies that a separation of the mechanisms ensuring the coordination between mitochondrial multiplication and cell division has occurred. This fact is interesting in the light of the current hypotheses concerning the mechanisms regulating mitochondrial division (Williamson, 1970; Lloyd et al. 1971; Barath & Kuntzel, 1972). It does not contradict any of the models proposed by these authors. The situation analysed here after conjugation also accounts for the initial isolation of the E R strains which implied an intense selective multiplication under the pressure of erythromycin of 'the' initially mutated E R mitochondria. Furthermore, replication of mitochondrial DNA without cell multiplication is also accompanied by the expression 32-2 486 R. Perasso and A. Adoutte of the functions carried by this DNA, since the mitochondria become phenotypically resistant. (This is most probably the necessary condition for their multiplication.) On the whole, we have studied a very peculiar system of mitochondrial biogenesis, which reveals the great capacity of these organelles to respond to a selective pressure, pointing out, therefore, their important extent of autonomy in replication and in expression of their functions. We thank Drs J. Beisson and J. Andre for support and encouragement throughout this work and Dr J. Beisson for many helpful discussions on the manuscript. We are specially grateful to Dr T. M. Sonneborn for critical reading of the manuscript and numerous suggestions. This study was supported in part by the Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (ERA 174, LA 86, and R.C.P. No. 284) and by the Direction des Recherches et Moyens d'Essais (contract 72/778). REFERENCES ADOUTTE, A. (1973). Mitochondrial mutations in Paramecium: phenotypical characterization and recombination. In Int. Conf. on The Biogenesis of Mitochondria (ed. A. Kroon & C. Saccone). London and New York: Academic Press (in Press). ADOUTTE, A. & BEISSON, J. (1970). Cytoplasmic inheritance of erythromycin-resistant mutations in Paramecium. Mol. gen. Genet. 108, 70-77. ADOUTTE, A. & BEISSON, J. (1972). Evolution of mixed populations of genetically different mitochondria in Paramecium aurelia. Nature, Lond. 235, 393-395. ADOUTTE, A., BALMEFREZOL, M., BEISSON, J. & ANDRE, J. (1972). The effects of erythromycin and chloramphenicol on the ultrastructure of mitochondria in sensitive and resistant strains of Paramecium. J. Cell Biol. 54, 8-19. BARATH, Z. & KUNTZEL, H. (1972). Cooperation of mitochondrial and nuclear genes in specifying the mitochondrial genetic apparatus in Neurospora crassa. Proc. natn. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 69, 1371-1374. BEALE, G. H. (1969). A note on the inheritance of erythromycin-resistance in Paramecium aurelia. Genet. Res. 14, 341-342. BEALE, G. H., KNOWLES, J. K. & TAIT, A. (1972). Mitochondrial genetics in Paramecium. Nature, Lond. 235, 396-397BOLOTIN, M., COEN, D., DEUTSCH, J., DUJON, B., NETTER, P., PETROCHILO, E. & SLONIMSKI, P. (1971). La recombinaison des mitochondries chez Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Bull. Inst. Pasteur 69, 215-239. KNOWLES, J. K. (1972). Observations on two mitochondrial phenotypes in single paramecium cells. Expl Cell Res. 70, 223-226. LLOYD, D., TURNER, G., POOLE, R. K., NICHOLL, W. G. & ROACH, G. I. (1971). An hypothesis of nuclear mitochondrial interactions for the control of mitochondrial biogenesis based on experiments with Tetrahymena. Subcellular Biochem. 1, 91-95. NILSSON, J. (1970). Cytolysomes in Tetrahymena pyriformis GL. C.r. Trav. Lab. Carlsberg 38, 87-121. PREER, J. R., Jr. (1948). A study of some properties of the cytoplasmic factor 'Kappa' in P. aurelia, variety 2. Genetics, Princeton 33, 349-404. SONNEBORN, T. M. (1970). Methods in Paramecium research. In Methods in Cell Physiology, vol. 4 (ed. D. Prescott), pp. 241-339. London and New York: Academic Press. THOMAS, D. Y. & WILKIE, D. (1968). Recombination of mitochondrial drug-resistance factors in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Biochem. biophys. Res. Comnmn. 30, 368-372. WILLIAMSON, D. H. (1970). The effect of environmental and genetic factors on the replication of mitochondrial DNA in yeast. In Control of Organelle Development, Symp. Soc. exp. Biol. 24, pp. 247-276. Cambridge University Press. (Received 15 August 1973) Selection of mitochondria in Paramecium Figs 4 and 5. For legend see p. 488. 488 R. Perasso and A. Adoutte All micrographs are magnified 30000 times. Fig. 4. Cell 14a (see Fig. 1), that is, a cell derived from a sensitive ex-conjugant after 24 h in erythromycin-containing medium (ERY). Some mitochondrial profiles (arrows) are devoid of cristae; most show a marked decrease in the amount of cristae. A trichocyst (t), is seen in transverse section. Fig. 5. Cell 14b (see Fig. i), that is, a cell derived from the resistant ex-conjugant of pair 14 after 24 h in ERY; most mitochondria appear normal; some (arrows) show a slight decrease in the amount of cristae. Peroxysomes (p) mimick mitochondria devoid of cristae; they cannot be confused, however, since their envelope is a single membrane. Fig. 6. Cell 14a!, i.e. a cell derived from the sensitive ex-conjugant after 48 h in ERY. Cristae have almost completely disappeared, p, peroxysome. Fig. 7. Cell I4b1; i.e. a cell derived from the resistant ex-conjugant after 48 h in ERY. Mitochondria are normal except for some slight decrease in diameter and in amount of cristae. tb, trichocyst body; tt, trichocyst tip. Selection of mitochondria in Paramecium 489 490 R. Perasso and A. Adoutte Fig. 8. Cell 14 a3, i.e. a cell derived from the sensitive ex-conjugant that has just started to resume growth after 4 days in ERY. r, resistant-looking mitochondria; s, sensitivelooking mitochondrion; tb, trichocyst body; tt, trichocyst tip. Selection of mitochondria in Paramecium 492 R. Perasso and A. Adontte Fig. 9. A purely Es cell, taken as a control, after 4 days in ERY. Note the considerable differences when compared with cell 14a3 (Fig. 8). Mitochondria are very elongated and cristae have disappeared from most of them, but when they do remain they have a wavy configuration (w); plates (pi) of rigid appearance occur within mitochondria. Fig. 10. A typical field of cell i4a3, like other cells of the E[! x E,s cross when resuming growth, r, resistant-looking mitochondria, one of which is apparently undergoing a budding process (b); s, sensitive-looking mitochondrion. Selection of mitochondria in Paramecium 493 494 R- Perasso and A. Adoutte Fig. 11. A late stage of the process of transformation: this cell has gone through 5 or 6 fissions in ERY and is resuming growth at a nearly normal rate. A typically sensitivelooking mitochondrion can be seen (s) surrounded by resistant-looking mitochondria (r). p, peroxysome; tb, trichocyst body. Selection of mitochondria in Paramecium 496 R. Perasso and A. Adoutte Fig. 12. A cell derived from the sensitive ex-conjugant of pair No. 72, from the E[l02 x Es combination, after 48 h in ERY (cell 72 bx). A large majority of mitochondria have the characteristics of resistant mitochondria; 2 'mosaic' mitochondria can be seen (in). Glycogen is indicated by arrows. Fig. 13. A field from cell 69b 1]; derived from the sensitive ex-conjugant of pair 69, after 3 fissions and 4 days in ERY. The distinction between sensitive-looking mitochondria (s) and resistant-looking ones (r) is very clear. Selection of mitochondria in Paramecium