Download An onerous task ahead

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts

Global warming hiatus wikipedia , lookup

Heaven and Earth (book) wikipedia , lookup

Instrumental temperature record wikipedia , lookup

Effects of global warming on human health wikipedia , lookup

Climatic Research Unit documents wikipedia , lookup

Climate resilience wikipedia , lookup

Global warming controversy wikipedia , lookup

ExxonMobil climate change controversy wikipedia , lookup

Climate change mitigation wikipedia , lookup

Low-carbon economy wikipedia , lookup

Climate sensitivity wikipedia , lookup

Climate change denial wikipedia , lookup

Fred Singer wikipedia , lookup

Mitigation of global warming in Australia wikipedia , lookup

Economics of climate change mitigation wikipedia , lookup

Climate engineering wikipedia , lookup

General circulation model wikipedia , lookup

Climate change adaptation wikipedia , lookup

Climate change and agriculture wikipedia , lookup

Citizens' Climate Lobby wikipedia , lookup

Effects of global warming wikipedia , lookup

Global warming wikipedia , lookup

Climate change in Tuvalu wikipedia , lookup

Attribution of recent climate change wikipedia , lookup

Climate change feedback wikipedia , lookup

Climate change in Canada wikipedia , lookup

Climate governance wikipedia , lookup

Media coverage of global warming wikipedia , lookup

German Climate Action Plan 2050 wikipedia , lookup

Solar radiation management wikipedia , lookup

Economics of global warming wikipedia , lookup

Effects of global warming on humans wikipedia , lookup

Climate change in the United States wikipedia , lookup

Scientific opinion on climate change wikipedia , lookup

Effects of global warming on Australia wikipedia , lookup

2009 United Nations Climate Change Conference wikipedia , lookup

Climate change and poverty wikipedia , lookup

Carbon Pollution Reduction Scheme wikipedia , lookup

Climate change, industry and society wikipedia , lookup

Business action on climate change wikipedia , lookup

Politics of global warming wikipedia , lookup

Surveys of scientists' views on climate change wikipedia , lookup

Public opinion on global warming wikipedia , lookup

IPCC Fourth Assessment Report wikipedia , lookup

Transcript
10/17/2016
Sujatha Byravan writes on the Paris Climate Agreement — an onerous task ahead ­ The Hindu
OPINION » COMMENT
Published: October 17, 2016 00:58 IST | Updated: October 17, 2016 05:04 IST October 17, 2016
An onerous task ahead
Sujatha Byravan
Getty Images
INDEFINITE CHANGE: “This September, when concentrations of CO2 should have been lowest for the year, the values remained above 400
ppm.” Smoke billows from a coal­fired generator at a steel factory in Hebei, China.
The Paris Climate Agreement is set to enter into force, but without the support needed to implement it
The European Union’s ratification of the Paris Climate Agreement has nudged it beyond the required threshold — ratification by more than 55
Parties to the Convention accounting for at least 55 per cent of global greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. This will ensure that the Agreement
will enter into force, or become part of international law, on November 4, 2016. Many leaders have praised the speed at which the ratification
process moved forward. Patricia Espinosa, Executive Secretary of the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC),
said that she viewed this accelerated process as an expression of the importance that countries attach to climate change.
The Paris Agreement, in contrast with the 1997 Kyoto Protocol, makes all countries responsible for reducing GHGs instead of just the rich or
Annex­1 countries, which are responsible for the bulk of the total GHG concentrations in the atmosphere. Individual countries are now
responsible for implementing their Nationally Determined Contributions (NDCs), goals that each country developed and submitted to the
UNFCCC before the Paris Conference of Parties (COP) last December. Most of the pledges, including India’s, are partly or entirely conditional
on financial support for their implementation.
Support for building capacity The thorny question that remains is, what are the implications for an agreement that enters into force without the support needed to
implement it? Rich countries are supposed to make available $100 billion annually by 2020 for climate­related projects in poor countries.
There is little sign of any significant progress towards this goal. We are therefore at a point where support for building capacity to achieve the
NDC goals requires the same level of international pressure and enthusiasm that was demonstrated in ratifying the Paris Agreement.
The governing body of the Paris Agreement will hold its first meeting at the COP in Marrakech in November 2016. This is referred to as the
Meeting of theParties to the Paris Agreement (CMA). In fact, the Ad Hoc Working Group on the Paris Agreement (APA) still has a number of
tasks ahead of it for implementing the Agreement. The APA has been mandated to prepare for the entry into force of the Paris Agreement
and also for convening the CMA.
Coincidentally, another big news wasannounced recently: the earth’s atmosphere has exceeded 400 parts per million (ppm) of carbon dioxide
(CO2).CO2 concentrations have been steadily going upward since humans began removing fuel from below the ground and using it to fire up
the industrial revolution. There are small annual fluctuations in these concentrations, which are usually at their lowest after the summer as
vegetation in the Northern hemisphere absorbs the atmospheric gas. In autumn, as leaves fall, the CO2 levels begin to increase.
Over the past few years, several places in the world have recorded concentrations above 400 ppm, but this September, when concentrations
should generally be lowest for the year, the values have remained above 400 ppm; the world as we know it has changed indefinitely. The
scientific community has generally regarded a GHG concentration of 350­400 ppm as the maximum level needed for a safe climate. James
Hansen from Columbia University wrote nearly a decade ago: “Paleoclimate evidence and ongoing climate change suggest that CO2 will need
to be reduced from its current 385 ppm to at most 350 ppm, but likely less than that.” Other scientists have in the past suggested that 400
ppm be treated as a safe threshold, but also note that the last time the earth’s atmosphere saw such concentrations was over two million years
ago, when sea levels were 6 metres higher than they are today.
http://www.thehindu.com/opinion/op­ed/sujatha­byravan­writes­on­the­paris­climate­agreement­an­onerous­task­ahead/article9226984.ece?css=print
1/2
10/17/2016
Sujatha Byravan writes on the Paris Climate Agreement — an onerous task ahead ­ The Hindu
No matter what the magic figure, these higher concentrations of CO2 and other GHGs are trapping more heat and we are getting close to
average warming by 1.5ºC over pre­industrial levels. A group of seven leading scientists produced a brief report in September this year called
“The Truth about Climate Change.” They explained that with the high levels of GHGs already in the atmosphere and the slow but perceptible
response of the climate system, we can expect average global temperatures to rise by 1.5ºC in the 2030s and cross 2ºC as early as 2050,
which is well within the lifetime of many people alive today. The current NDC pledges made by the countries of the world, as ambitious as
some of them are, will not be sufficient to put us below the 2ºC target.
Transformational change Given the enormous scale of the challenge, it has become clear to many who have been working for long in the domain that tinkering at the
edges to tackle climate change will be inadequate. What is needed is a significant shift in human behaviour and economic systems, which are
closely tied with atmospheric systems and the future of our planet. In other words, a transformational change, a system­wide modification in
social, economic and technological institutions will be necessary.
Currently, about 82 per cent of the world’s energy comes from burning fossil fuels. This is used in different sectors and entails the upstream
production of electricity, petrol, diesel and other forms of usable energy. Improving efficiencies of energy production and use, and increasing
the contribution from renewables are major improvements, but the world will have to go to “net zero” emissions over the next few decades in
order to avoid exceeding a 2ºC rise by mid­century or soon thereafter. These changes will need to take place while the lives of the poor in
developing nations continue to improve, the world population increases, and we also adapt to living in a warmer world. In the last three years,
global emissions, which were rising at around 4 per cent per year, have slowed to under 1 per cent growth, but it is both a scientific and social
challenge to expect global emissions to peak very soon and go down to zero and remain there.
The dim source of light in this otherwise grim picture is that transformational change may in fact be taking place now in several small isolated
communities around the world. These are eco­villages and transition towns (although they also go by other names) where renewables alone
are used, people track all their emissions, and try to build communities while adopting simpler and less consumerist lifestyles.
Further, on October 15, a global agreement was reached to limit the use of hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs), which are used mainly as refrigerants
and are powerful GHGs. According to estimates, this agreement could help avoid about 0.4ºC warming until 2100. But HFCs are a small
proportion of GHGs and broad change of the scale that is required severely tests our imagination. It is only possible if social movements, civil
society organisations, legal systems and political leaders work together. Such single­minded purpose across nations rich and poor, weak and
strong, is only possible if there is a sense of oneness, of global solidarity, to address climate change. Whether such transformation is possible in
our lifetimes remains to be seen.
Sujatha Byravan is Principal Research Scientist at the Center for Study of Science, Technology & Policy, Bengaluru.
Printable version | Oct 17, 2016 9:41:19 AM | http://www.thehindu.com/opinion/op­ed/sujatha­byravan­writes­on­the­paris­climate­
agreement­an­onerous­task­ahead/article9226984.ece
© The Hindu
http://www.thehindu.com/opinion/op­ed/sujatha­byravan­writes­on­the­paris­climate­agreement­an­onerous­task­ahead/article9226984.ece?css=print
2/2