* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download The three-dimensional arrangement of chromosomes at meiotic
Tissue engineering wikipedia , lookup
Extracellular matrix wikipedia , lookup
Spindle checkpoint wikipedia , lookup
Cell encapsulation wikipedia , lookup
Cellular differentiation wikipedia , lookup
Programmed cell death wikipedia , lookup
Cell culture wikipedia , lookup
Organ-on-a-chip wikipedia , lookup
Cell growth wikipedia , lookup
List of types of proteins wikipedia , lookup
The three-dimensional arrangement of chromosomes at meiotic metaphase I in normal and interchange heterozygotes of Briza humilis JANET M. MOSS and BRIAN G. MURRAY* Department of Botany, University of Auckland, Private Bag, Auckland, New Zealand * Author for correspondence Summary Pollen mother cells at metaphase I have been reconstructed from serial sections in normal and interchange heterozygotes of Briza humilis. The pollen mother cells have an irregular shape with a prominent projection from the tangential face into the anther loculus. The seven bivalents of the normal plant are usually arranged with one bivalent in a central position surrounded by a ring of the remaining six or as a ring of all seven bivalents. The centrahperipheral distribution of quadrivalents is different in two different interchange plants; in a sector analysis, where cells are divided into four Introduction The precision of the synaptic process and the regularity of chromosome segregation suggests a high degree of order in the eukaryote nucleus prior to and during meiosis. Examples of chromosome order in the nucleus include the regular placement of centromeres and telomeres from telophase through to prophase to give the Rabl orientation, and the very numerous, though conflicting, examples of somatic association or genome separation in mitotic metaphases (Avivi and Feldman, 1980; Bennett, 1983). Some of the contradictory results can be reconciled by acknowledging that chromosome positioning changes between mitosis and meiosis and between stages of cell division (Chaly and Brown, 1988; Oud et al. 1989). The reports of different papers are therefore best compared when the same stage and type of division has been studied. There have been fewer studies on the ordering of meiotic chromosomes, but there are several examples of secondary pairing in a variety of plants (Darlington, 1965); and in wheat, marked bivalents have been used in attempts to demonstrate the non-random ordering of bivalents at metaphase I (Kempanna and Riley, 1964; Yacobi et al. 1985a,6; Heslop-Harrison and Bennett, 1985a). Two conflicting patterns have emerged from these studies on wheat. Kempanna and Riley (1964) and Yacobi et al. (1985a,b) found that the marked bivalents were randomly distributed, but Heslop-Harrison and Bennett (1985a) observed B genome bivalents preferentially positioned at the edge of the metaphase plate while A and D genome bivalents tended to be more centrally distributed. In diploids, both Rickards (1984, 1986) and Murray (1986) have used interchanges to mark specific chromosomes and have found in lateral spreads of metaphase I chromosomes Journal of Cell Science 97, 565-570 (1990) Printed in Great Britain © The Company of Biologists Limited 1990 quarters relative to the tangential face of the pollen mother cell, the two plants also show differences in quadrivalent distribution, indicating that individual chromosomes occupy different positions in the cell. The relevance of these results to the positioning of quadrivalents in lateral squashes of meiotic metaphase I are discussed. Key words: Briza humilis, 3D reconstruction, interchange heterozygotes, chromosome positioning. in Allium triquetrum L., Secale cereale L. and Briza humilis Bieb. that the interchange quadrivalent preferentially occupies a position at the edge of the metaphase plate. In addition, they found that this pattern of distribution depends on the species under consideration, the type and orientation (adjacent or alternate) of the quadrivalent, the percentage of each type of quadrivalent orientation, the identity of the chromosomes involved in the interchange quadrivalent, and the presence or absence of B chromosomes. All the studies mentioned above are based on conventional squash preparations and consequently the threedimensional nature of the cells has been lost. Although three-dimensional reconstruction from electron micrographs has been widely used to examine synaptonemal complexes at prophase, very few investigations into the three-dimensional arrangement of metaphase chromosomes have been attempted. The only report based on three-dimensional reconstruction of serially sectioned metaphase I cells is that of Heslop-Harrison and Bennett (19856) on wheat, where the frequency of bivalent interlocking was studied. The drawback in reconstructing cells from electron micrographs is that it is a very timeconsuming process and consequently only a small number of cells can be studied. A possible solution to this problem could come from the utilization of semi-thin (l/<m) sections and the light microscope although ultimately confocal scanning laser microscopy will provide the most rapid and reliable answer. This paper describes observations made from serial sections of Briza humilis pollen mother cells at meiotic metaphase I in normal plants and interchange heterozygotes, using the light microscope. These observations suggest that the current idea of alternate interchange 565 quadrivalents as two vertically aligning, cooriented centromere pairs may not accurately reflect the threedimensional situation. Further, some evidence for a link between non-random quadrivalent distributions in metaphase squash preparations to pollen mother cell shape and spindle orientation within the cell is presented. Materials and methods Briza humilis is an annual grass species endemic to the Balkan Peninsula. The population studied has been maintained in a glasshouse for several generations and contained some plants that were interchange heterozygotes. One B chromosome is also present in some plants. The normal karyotype contains seven pairs of metacentric chromosomes of very similar size. A high chiasma frequency at meiosis, and the formation of only one chiasma per arm, means that most metaphase I preparations contain seven ring bivalents (Jackson and Murray, 1986). Two of the three anthers from a floret were selected for serial sectioning if the remaining anther was at full metaphase I as observed in orcein squash preparations. These two anthers were fixed in a 2.5 % glutaraldehyde, 2 % paraformaldehyde solution in 0.05 M phosphate buffer, pH 7.3, at 2°C. They were then stained in a 1 % (w/v) safranin solution made up in the same phosphate buffer before infiltration and embedding in methacrylate resin (Kulzer Technovit). Staining was necessary to see the fixed anthers in the resin. Serial transverse sections, 1 /an thick, were then made using a glass Ralph knife, and dried down in order on microscope slides. The slides were stained using Schiff s reagent (Pearse, 1985) followed by a 1 % aqueous light green counterstain. They were observed and drawn under phase-contrast optics with a light microscope fitted with a camera lucida. Only pollen mother cells where the plane of the metaphase plate corresponded to the plane of sectioning were reconstructed, to simplify analysis. Twenty two pollen mother cells were analysed from a normal plant as a control (plant c), 18 from one interchange plant (plant a) and 22 from another plant with a different interchange (plant b). Seven cells from a plant with one B chromosome were also reconstructed. All sections were traced onto transparent sheets so that reconstructions could easily be made by visual comparison. By aligning the serial sections of a given cell using the tangential face adjacent to the anther wall as a reference point, each bivalent or equivalent figure was plotted through the cell, and identified as bivalent, quadrivalent or univalent. To simplify the data from a series of sections for analysis, a 'representative cross-section' was constructed. The chromosome figures were resolved to a set of lines, and their positions taken from the middle section in the series in which all seven bivalents or equivalents, appeared (Fig. 1A). For analysis of position alone, the line representing each bivalent or equivalent was replaced by its midpoint, which was assumed to correspond approximately to the position of the centromeres in the bivalent (Fig. IB). To test for central-peripheral positioning trends, the mean centromere position was calculated by averaging the coordinates of each point relative to an arbitrary set of axes. The four points corresponding to an alternate quadrivalent were each given half the weight of the others. A circle centred on this mean centromere position, with one seventh the area of the smallest possible circle enclosing all seven points, was drawn. Cells were scored as to whether or not one point was found within this inner circle (Fig. 1C). Position relative to the tangential face adjacent to the anther wall was analysed by dividing the cell into four sectors as shown in Fig. ID. The frequency with which the points corresponding to the quadrivalents fell within each sector was scored for plants a and b. Scoring of the bivalent frequencies in each sector for the noninterchange plant was used as a control. Results Pollen mother cell shape, spindle orientation and general chromosome distribution In transverse section, each of the four locules of the anther appear approximately circular, with a single layer of pollen mother cells lining its hollow cavity. Each cell has a cross-sectional shape that corresponds roughly to a sector of a ring. The walls of the pollen mother cells appear lightly stained, and show irregular thickening. In most cases, thickening is most pronounced on the wall facing Fig. 1. Diagram to show: (A) the selection of a representative section of a pollen mother cell; (B) the representation of the bivalents in a section by a line and its mid-point (•), which is used in C to determine the central (inner circle) or peripheral (outer circle) location of the chromosome figure. In D the cell is divided into four sectors (numbered 1-4) following the placement of arbitrary axes (labelled a) perpendicular to a line (L) representing the tangential wall of the pollen mother cell that is adjacent to the tapetum. The lines delimiting the sectors are placed at 45° angles relative to the tangential wall (L). The central/ peripheral circles (in C) and sectors (in D) are centered on the mid-point of the cell (O) ascertained as outlined in the text. 566 J. M. Moss and B. G. Murray the loculus, and this wall has a pointed projection extending into the cavity (Fig. 2). The pollen mother cells have two large, tangential faces, one of which bears the projection, and four smaller radial faces. In some instances the walls abutting adjacent cells in the ring are thickened and convoluted so that the cells fit together like pieces of a jigsaw. The mean cell volume was estimated to be 11500± 1079 [im3 (based on the 22 cells reconstructed from plant 6). Within the pollen mother cells, the orientation of the metaphase plate relative to the cell walls is not constant. However, the spindle poles usually orient toward the small, radial walls, rather than the large tangential faces. The chromosomes occupy an approximately circular area in the cell cross-section. Their combined volume extends through about 40% of the depth of the cell, constituting an average of about 11% of the cell volume. The uniform size of the Briza chromosomes is evident in that, for a particular cell, each bivalent extends through a very similar number of sections, although in many cases not all bivalents begin or end in the same section. Individual bivalents are usually arranged in a radial fashion. Unpaired B chromosomes, where present, are often nearer one pole than the main group of chromosomes, separated from them by several sections. Their long axis is not aligned with the polar axis of the cell. Three-dimensional conformation of bivalents and quadrivalents Bivalents. In a series of sections each bivalent first appears as an oval outline, corresponding to the top of a ring (Fig. 3A). In subsequent sections this oval outline is resolved into two circular outlines corresponding to the sides of the ring. Just before the bivalent disappears from the series, the two circular outlines are seen closer together, then merging into one oval outline once more. The bivalent usually extends through approximately seven sections. Alternate quadrivalents. Alternate quadrivalents appear like a pair of bivalents lying side by side in the first part of a series of sections, and as another pair, with long Fig. 2. A reconstructed pollen mother cell showing the wall projection (p) on the inner tangential wall, the outer tangential face is obscured. Radial faces (r) constitute the top, bottom and side of the cell represented here. Scale, 10 /tm. A A (A) w V C B A A Wxv V V u V c /~\ uu 0 0 0 O o u o o Fig. 3. Diagram to show the three-dimensional shape and appearance in selected transverse sections of a bivalent (A), alternate quadrivalent (B) and adjacent quadrivalent (C). axes perpendicular to the first, in the latter part (Figs 3B, 4A and B). Adjacent quadrivalents. Adjacent quadrivalents appear like bivalents, except that the two circular outlines are often separated by a greater distance, and are usually present through a greater number of sections (7-13) than the bivalents (Fig. 3C). Central/peripheral analysis. Table 1 shows the results of the central/peripheral analysis. In the control plant (c) most cells (82%) showed six bivalents in a peripheral position and one placed centrally within them. The remaining cells (18%) showed all seven bivalents in a peripheral distribution. We have used this central/ peripheral ratio to compare the distribution of the chromosomes in our two interchange plants with those of the normal one. A contingency /* test, using Yates' correction for small samples, shows that the differences between plants are significant (/=7.132, 0.05<P<0.01). When the plants are analysed in pairs the ratios are not significantly different for cxa (/2=0.032, 0.8<P<0.9) and exb (^=2.619, 0.1<P<0.2). The comparison of ax 6 is, however, significant Of2=4.045, 0.05<P<0.01). With regard to the positioning of the two types of quadrivalent, when a and b are analysed separately and when the data are pooled, contingency x2 tests in all cases give nonsignificant results. Thus the alternate and adjacent quadrivalents do not differ in their frequency distribution in central or peripheral positions. Sector analysis. The results of scoring the location of the quadrivalents using four sectors are shown in Fig. 5. Sectors 1 and 3 and 2 and 4 are presented side by side in view of their relationship when cells are viewed from the anther loculus or flattened on their radial wall. The distribution of bivalents in the control plant was not significantly different from random (^=2.21, 0.1<P<0.2). The two interchange plants did, however, show clear differences in quadrivalent distribution. In plant a, alternate quadrivalents were more frequently found in sector 3, while adjacent quadrivalents were most frequent in sector 4. In plant b, both alternate and adjacent quadrivalents were most frequently found in sector 2 (Fig. 5). Because of the small sample size and the relationships of sectors 1 and 3 and 2 and 4 when cells are squashed (see Discussion), the results from these pairs of Chromosome position in Briza interchange heterozygotes 567 sectors were pooled before further x2 analysis, again using Yates' correction for small samples. In plant a the distribution of total quadrivalents is clearly not significantly different from random 0^=0.005, 0.9<P<0.95) but in plant b the result approaches significance (x*=3.68, 0.05<P<0.1). When the two interchange plants are compared, a heterogeneity x2 test shows that the differ- ence between them with regard to alternate quadrivalents are significantly different (/=4.73, 0.05<P<0.01) but for adjacent quadrivalents it is not 0^=2.54, 0.1<P<0.2). Discussion The previous demonstration that specific interchange quadrivalents are preferentially placed at the edge of laterally spread meiotic metaphase I chromosomes (Murray, 1986) suggested that the bivalents and quadrivalent sector 1 sector 3 sector 2 sector 4 Fig. 4. Line drawings (A) and the corresponding serial sections (B) through a pollen mother cell from interchange plant b. The shaded outline represents the interchange quadrivalent. Scale, 10/im. 568 J. M. Moss and B. G. Murray Fig. 5. Diagram to show the frequency distribution of bivalents in each sector in the control plant c (A) and the distribution of alternate and adjacent quadrivalents in each sector in plant a (B and D) and plant b (C and E). Table 1. Summary of positional patterns of bivalents and quadrivalents in all reconstructed cells from the three plants A. Control plant (c) Bivalent distribution pattern 1 Central:6 Peripheral 7 Peripheral 18 (82) 4(18) B. Interchange plants (b and c) Quadrivalent position 5+1 arrangement Central Peripheral Total All peripheral Plant a Alternate quadrivalents Adjacent quadrivalents Total quadrivalents 4(36) 1 (14) 5(28) 6 (55) 5 (72) 11 (28) 10 (91) 6(86) 16 (89) 1(9) 1 (14) 2(11) Plant b Alternate quadrivalents Adjacent quadrivalents Total quadrivalents 4(24) 0(0) 4 (18) 5(29) 3(60) 8 (36) 9(53) 3(60) 12 (54) 8(47) 2(40) 10 (46) Percentage values are shown in brackets. (A) results from the control plant (c) where the bivalents are distributed in the two possible patterns given and (B) results from the two interchange plants (b and c) giving the location of the quadrivalent in cells with the 5+1 arrangement and without a centrally placed bivalent. have fixed positions in the cell. It also requires that the plane of flattening of the cell is non- random and that there is no differential effect of squashing on the quadrivalents themselves. In an attempt to demonstrate these points we have reconstructed 40 cells from two different plants and a further 22 cells from a normal bivalent-forming control plant. The technique reported here gives this sort of information as readily as the electron microscope technique reported in the literature (Heslop-Harrison and Bennett, 19856). The present observations contribute significantly both to our knowledge of pollen mother cell structure and shape and to our appreciation of the threedimensional orientation of metaphase figures more usually seen, as squashes, in only two dimensions. They therefore allow a better interpretation of the results of the less time-consuming squashing technique. The observed circular distributions of metaphase chromosomes suggest that the linear lateral spreads frequently produced by squashing are the product of flattening perpendicular to the metaphase plate. Lateral flattening of a continuous ring of bivalents could easily be imagined to insert bivalents from one side of the ring amongst those of the other side and to place bivalents between the arms of the quadrivalents, giving apparent overlap. From our analysis of central versus peripheral positioning, the different distribution of quadrivalents in the two interchange plants (Table 1) would also help to explain the difference in their frequency of placement in lateral squashes of meiotic metaphase I (Murray, 1986). Three-dimensional reconstruction shows that pollen mother cells are not spherical; their tangential walls are clearly larger than their radial walls and the inner tangential wall has a large projection into the anther loculus. With these features in mind, it is most unlikely that these cells will flatten in a random plane and the chromosomes in sectors 2 and 4 are more likely to end up in an edge position than those in sectors 1 and 3. Our two interchange plants showed different distributions of alternate but not adjacent quadrivalents in these sectors and this is reflected in their different positioning frequencies in squash preparations (Moss, 1988). Since different chromosomes are involved in these interchanges (Moss, 1988) the results suggest that the chromosomes occupy different positions in the cell. In previous analyses of chromosome position in squash preparations, the two pairs of vertically aligned centromeres in the figure-eight alternate quadrivalents have been assigned two positions in a numbered array of bivalents (Rickards, 1984). However, from the evidence documented here we see that this figure-eight orientation is a product of oblique squashing of the U-shaped ring structure, and is not real. In the three-dimensional cell, all four centromeres are on different vertical axes and pairs of centromeres do not oppose each other. This also has implications for the idea of balancing forces of the spindle being responsible for different quadrivalent orientations (Sybenga and Rickards, 1987). However, Rickards (personal communication) has observed, using confocal microscopy, that the centromeres of the chain quadrivalent in Allium triquetrum are all in a single plane. Thus, the arrangement of centromeres in quadrivalents clearly can differ. One further point in need of resolution is the relationship between B chromosomes and quadrivalent position (Murray, 1986). In our reconstructions the univalent B lies well separated from the other chromosomes on the metaphase plate and therefore it appears unlikely that its effect on quadrivalent placement is a consequence of its physical interference with the other chromosomes. B chromosomes have been shown to cause the breakdown of the regular equatorial alignment of bivalents in Hypochoeris maculata (Parker et al. 1978), so it is possible that they alter spindle position in B. humilis, thus bringing about the previously observed change in quadrivalent position (Murray, 1986). The observations reported here add weight to those reported previously (Murray, 1986) by showing that there is non-random order of the quadrivalents in the plants studied, and that there are differences in chromosome arrangements between the plants. This latter phenomenon is evidence that quadrivalents produced by different interchanges have different positioning behaviour, suggesting that each chromosome may have its own distinctive position. It is possible to speculate on the Chromosome position in Briza interchange heterozygotes 569 mechanism for achieving this since there is increasing evidence that the cytoskeleton of microtubules and F-actin play an important role in the establishment of polarity and the positioning of the nucleus in the pollen mother cell (Brown and Lemon, 1982; Traas et al. 1989; Van Lammeren et al. 1985). Since (1) the chromosomes are attached to the inner nuclear membrane; (2) the nucleus is positioned and spindle poles are determined by the cytoskeleton; and (3) the cell itself is of irregular shape, there is a progression of possible control mechanisms through the cell cycle. Thus there is a plausible explanation for the non-random placement of chromosomes in lateral spreads of meiotic metaphases that have now been reported in several species. We thank Dr G. K. Rickards for his many helpful comments on earlier drafts of the manuscript and Dr J. B. White for her help with the sectioning. Grants from the New Zealand University Grants Committee are also gratefully acknowledged. KEMPANNA, C. AND RILEY, R. (1964). Secondary association between genetically equivalent bivalents. Heredity 19, 289-299. Moss, J. M. (1988). A study of chromosome arrangement at meiosis in Briza hunulis. Unpublished M.Sc. thesis, University of Auckland. MURRAY, B. G. (1986). Interchange quadrivalents and chromosome order at meiotic metaphase I in Briza L. (Gramineae). Chromosoma 94, 293-296. OUD, J. L., MANS, A., BRAKENHOFF, G. J., VAN DER VOORT, H. T. M., VAN SPRONSEN, E. A. AND NANNINGA, N. (1989). Three-dimensional chromosome arrangement of Crepis capillans in mitotic prophase and anaphase as studied by confocal scanning laser microscopy. J Cell Sci. 92, 329-339 PARKER, J. S., AINSWORTH, C C AND TAYLOR, S. (1978). The B chromosome system of Hypochoeris metadata II. B-effects on meiotic A-chromosome behaviour. Chromosoma 67, 123-143. PEARSE, A. G. E. (1985). Histochemistry, Theoretical and Applied, vol. 2, Analytical Technology. Edinburgh- Churchill Livingstone. RICKARDS, G. K. (1984). Position and orientation in the metaphase equator of an interchange quadrivalent of Allium tnquetrum. Genet. Res. 43, 139-148. RICKARDS, G. K. (1986). Position and orientation in the metaphase equator of an interchange quadrivalent of hybrid rye. Chromosoma 94, 249-252. SYBENGA, J. AND RICKARDS, G. K. (1987). The orientation of References AVIVI, L. AND FELDMAN, M. (1980). Arrangement of chromosomes in the interphase nucleus of plants. Human Genet. 55, 281-295. BENNETT, M. D. (1983). The spatial distribution of chromosomes. In Kew Chromosome Conference II (ed. P. E. Brandham and M. D. Bennett), pp. 71—79. London: Allen and Unwin. BROWN, R. C. AND LEMON, B. E. (1982). infrastructure of meiosis in the moss Rhynchostegium serrulatum. I. Prophasic microtubules and spindle dynamics. Protoplasma 110, 23-33. CHALY, N. AND BROWN, D. L. (1988). The prometaphase configuration and chromosome order in early mitosis. J. Cell Sci. 91, 325-335. DARLINGTON, C. D (1965). Cytology. London: Churchill. HESLOP-HARRISON, J. S. AND BENNETT, M. D. (1985a). Heteromorphic bivalent association at meiosis in bread wheat. Heredity 55, 93-103. HESLOP-HARRISON, J. S. AND BENNETT, M. D. (19856). Interlocked bivalents in reconstructed metaphase I cells of bread wheat. J. Cell Sci. 75, 85-92. JACKSON, R. C. AND MURRAY, B G (1986). Quantitative analysis of diploid translocation heterozygotes: test of models and equations. Theor. appl Genet. 71, 600-606. 570 J. M. Moss and B. G. Murray multivalents at meiotic metaphase I: a workshop report. Genome 29, 612-620. TRAAS, J. P., BURGAIN, S. AND DUMAS DE VAULX, R. (1989). The organization of the cytoskeleton during meiosis in eggplant (Solanum melongena L.): microtubules and F-actin are both necessary for coordinated meiotic division. J. Cell Sci 92, 541-550. VAN LAMMEREN, A. A. M., KEIJZER, C J., WILLEMSE, M. T. M. AND KIEFT, H. (1985). Structure and function of the microtubular cytoskeleton during pollen development in Gasteria verrucosa (Mill.) H. Duval. Planta 165, 1-11. YACOBI, Y. Z., LEVANOVY, H. AND FELDMAN, M. (1985a). An ordered arrangement of bivalents at first meiotic metaphase of wheat. I. Hexaploid wheat. Chromosoma 91, 347-354. YACOBI, Y. Z., LEVANOVY, H. AND FELDMAN, M. (19856). An ordered arrangement of bivalents at first meiotic metaphase of wheat. II. Tetraploid wheat Chromosoma 91, 355-358. (Received 3 May 1990 - Accepted, in revised form. 6 August 1990)