* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download Tearing down barriers: understanding the
Biology and consumer behaviour wikipedia , lookup
Public health genomics wikipedia , lookup
Koinophilia wikipedia , lookup
Genetic engineering wikipedia , lookup
Genetically modified crops wikipedia , lookup
Artificial gene synthesis wikipedia , lookup
Polycomb Group Proteins and Cancer wikipedia , lookup
Gene expression programming wikipedia , lookup
Genetically modified organism containment and escape wikipedia , lookup
Site-specific recombinase technology wikipedia , lookup
Gene expression profiling wikipedia , lookup
Minimal genome wikipedia , lookup
Genome (book) wikipedia , lookup
Epigenetics of human development wikipedia , lookup
Designer baby wikipedia , lookup
Genome editing wikipedia , lookup
Nutriepigenomics wikipedia , lookup
Hybrid (biology) wikipedia , lookup
Genome evolution wikipedia , lookup
History of genetic engineering wikipedia , lookup
Microevolution wikipedia , lookup
Journal of Experimental Botany, Vol. 63, No. 17, 2, pp. 2012 pp.695–709, 6059–6067, 2012 doi:10.1093/jxb/err313 doi:10.1093/jxb/ers288 Advance Access publication 4 November, 2011 This paper is available online free of all access charges (see http://jxb.oxfordjournals.org/open_access.html for further details) RESEARCH PAPER Darwin Review Tearing downoceanica barriers: cadmium understanding thechanges molecular In Posidonia induces in DNA mechanismsand of interploidy methylation chromatin hybridizations patterning Nicole Schatlowski and Claudia Köhler* Maria Greco, Adriana Chiappetta, Leonardo Bruno and Maria Beatrice Bitonti* Plant Biology and Forest Genetics, UppsalaofBioCenter, Swedish University Agricultural and LinneandiCenter Department of Ecology, University of Calabria, Laboratory Plant Cyto-physiology, PonteofPietro Bucci, Sciences I-87036 Arcavacata Rende,of Plant Biology, Cosenza, Italy 750 07 Uppsala, Sweden * To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: [email protected] * To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: [email protected] Received 29 May 2011; Revised 8 July 2011; Accepted 18 August 2011 Received 2 July 2012; Revised 20 September 2012; Accepted 24 September 2012 Abstract Abstract In mammals, cadmium is widely considered as a non-genotoxic carcinogen acting through a methylation-dependent Polyploidization, the process leading to more than two sets of chromosomes, is widely recognized as a major speciaepigenetic mechanism. Here, the effects of Cd treatment on the DNA methylation patten are examined together with tion mechanism that might hold the key to Darwin’s ‘abominable mystery’, as he referred to the sudden rise of angioits effect on chromatin reconfiguration in Posidonia oceanica. DNA methylation level and pattern were analysed in sperms to ecological dominance. On their way to become polyploid most plants take the route through the production actively growing organs, under short- (6 h) and long- (2 d or 4 d) term and low (10 mM) and high (50 mM) doses of Cd, of unreduced gametes that might eventually lead to viable triploid intermediates able to backcross or self-fertilize to through a Methylation-Sensitive Amplification Polymorphism technique and an immunocytological approach, give rise to stable polyploid plants. Polyploids are almost instantly reproductively isolated from their non-polyploid respectively. The expression of one member of the CHROMOMETHYLASE (CMT) family, a DNA methyltransferase, ancestors; as hybridizations of species that differ in ploidy mostly lead to non-viable progeny. This immediate reprowas also assessed by qRT-PCR. Nuclear chromatin ultrastructure was investigated by transmission electron ductive barrier referred to as ‘triploid block’ is established in the endosperm, pointing towards an important but microscopy. Cd treatment induced a DNA hypermethylation, as well as an up-regulation of CMT, indicating that de greatly underestimated role of the endosperm in preventing interploidy hybridizations. Parent-of-origin specific gene novo methylation did indeed occur. Moreover, a high dose of Cd led to a progressive heterochromatinization of expression occurs predominantly in the endosperm and might cause the dosage-sensitivity of the endosperm. This interphase nuclei and apoptotic figures were also observed after long-term treatment. The data demonstrate that Cd article illustrates, based on the recent molecular and genetic findings mainly gained in the model species Arabidopsis perturbs the DNA methylation status through the involvement of a specific methyltransferase. Such changes are thaliana, the ‘journey’ of unreduced gametes to triploid intermediates to polyploid plants and will also discuss the linked to nuclear chromatin reconfiguration likely to establish a new balance of expressed/repressed chromatin. implications for interploidy and interspecies hybridizations. Overall, the data show an epigenetic basis to the mechanism underlying Cd toxicity in plants. Key words: Epigenetics, genomic imprinting, hybridization barriers, parental conflict, polyploidy, speciation. Key words: 5-Methylcytosine-antibody, cadmium-stress condition, chromatin reconfiguration, CHROMOMETHYLASE, DNA-methylation, Methylation- Sensitive Amplification Polymorphism (MSAP), Posidonia oceanica (L.) Delile. Introduction Introduction Polyploidy, the presence of more than two sets of chromosomes (Ramsey and Schemske, 2002) than a natural advantage associ- within a nucleus, is a widespread phenomenon among plant speIn the Mediterranean coastal ecosystem, the endemic cies and recent nuclear genome sequencing projects suggest that seagrass Posidonia oceanica (L.) Delile plays a relevant role all angiosperms might have experienced polyploidization durby ensuring primary production, water oxygenation and ing their evolution (Soltis et al., 2008; Jiao et al., 2011). This provides niches for some animals, besides counteracting observation in particular is striking since polyploidization has coastal erosion through its widespread meadows (Ott, 1980; been postulated an evolutionary ‘dead end’, with additional copPiazzi et al., 1999; Alcoverro et al., 2001). There is also ies of genes masking deleterious as well as potential advantaconsiderable evidence that P. oceanica plants are able to geous mutations and, therefore, escaping selection (Stebbins, absorb and accumulate metals from sediments (Sanchiz 1971). This hypothesis has been further supported the findet al., 1990; Pergent-Martini, 1998; Maserti et al.,by 2005) thus ing that recently formed polyploid plants diversify at lower rates influencing metal bioavailability in the marine ecosystem. (Mayrose et al., 2011) show reduced as evidenced For this reason, this and seagrass is widelyfitness, considered to be by decreased pollen viability and seed production (Ramsey and a metal bioindicator species (Maserti et al., 1988; Pergent Schemske, 2002). The high frequency of polyploids seems, et al., 1995; Lafabrie et al., 2007). Cd is one of most therefore, rather a consequence theirterrestrial high rate and of formation widespread heavy metals in of both marine environments. ated with newly formed polyploids. Although not essential for plant growth, in terrestrial The establishment and maintenance of a new polyploid lineage plants, Cd is readily absorbed by roots and translocated into is challenging since various difficulties need to be dealt with, aerial organs while, in acquatic plants, it is directly taken up above all the disposition to problems in meiosis that can result by leaves. In plants, Cd absorption induces complex changes in unbalanced chromosome numbers (aneuploidy). Aneuploidy at the genetic, biochemical and physiological levels which can be fatal, although the degree of lethality varies among plant ultimately account for its toxicity (Valle and Ulmer, 1972; species ranging from complete lethality to a substantial tolerance Sanitz di Toppi and Gabrielli, 1999; Benavides et al., 2005; (Henry et al., 2007). This contrasts with the situation in animals, Weber et al., 2006; Liu et al., 2008). The most obvious where most aneuploidies are embryo lethal (Matzke et al., 2003). symptom of Cd toxicity is a reduction in plant growth due to Nevertheless, (even successful aneuploidy) can lead an inhibitionaneuploidy of photosynthesis, respiration, and nitrogen to genomic and epigenetic instability (Papp et al., 1996), two metabolism, as well as a reduction in water and mineral threats that polyploids in general have to face (Chen, 2010). uptake (Ouzonidou et al., 1997; Perfus-Barbeoch et al., 2000; Furthermore, results in a genome increased in Shukla et al., polyploidization 2003; Sobkowiak and Deckert, 2003). size that needs to be accommodated in the nucleus which At the genetic level, in both animals and plants,might Cd can induce chromosomal aberrations, abnormalities in © 2011 The Author [2012]. Published by Oxford University Press [on behalf of the Society for Experimental Biology]. All rights reserved. ª The Author(s). For Permissions, please article email: distributed [email protected] This is an Open Access under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/bync/3.0), which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. 6060 | Schatlowski and Köhler cause changes in the nucleus and in the overall cell architecture (Comai, 2005). The existence of multiple copies of one gene can lead to functional diversification, with one copy acquiring a new function (neofunctionalization) or a partitioning of expression patterns (subfunctionalization) that involves reciprocal (most likely epigenetic) silencing of each of the copies leading to differential expression in different tissues (Lynch and Force, 2000; Adams et al., 2003). Many polyploid species are also able to reproduce asexually, either through somatic clones or apomixis, therefore being independent of the availability of mating partners and timing issues. Apomixis, asexual reproduction through seeds, comprises several aberrations to sexual reproduction including embryo sac formation without meiosis, autonomous embryo development, and adaptations in endosperm development and can be initiated at different stages in ovule development (Koltunow and Grossniklaus, 2003). The potential of a newly formed polyploid species to establish itself successfully depends on the available opportunities to colonize new habitats. Analysis of ancient polyploidy revealed a clustering of genome duplications around the Cretaceous– Tertiary extinction event approximately 65 million years ago (Fawcett et al., 2009), supporting the view that environmental changes promote polyploid establishment (Oswald and Nuismer, 2011). This article will discuss mechanisms underlying the formation of polyploid plants and their consequences for plant evolution. We will start by reviewing the pathways leading to unreduced gamete formation and then discuss the following hybridization process and the mechanisms that establish interploidy hybridization barriers (the triploid block). We propose that the triploid block acts as an instant reproductive barrier in the endosperm that successfully prevents backcrossing of the newly established polyploid plant with its progenitor. Therefore, the high rate of speciation events in response to polyploidization is a consequence of the triploid block that might underlie the rapid radiation of flowering plants in the mid-Cretaceous. Mechanisms of polyploid formation by unreduced gametes Polyploid plants can arise from a diploid ancestor through a duplication or multiplication of a set of chromosomes within one species (autopolyploidization) or through hybridization of different species followed by a genome doubling event (allopolyploidization). Whether auto- or allopolyploidy is more frequent among flowering plants is still under debate (Mallet, 2007), although it can be predicted that autopolyploidy is the more frequent form of polyploidy because within-species mating is more frequent than interspecific mating (Hegarty and Hiscock, 2008). However, a strict classification proves to be complex, as the degree of divergence to the parents is highly variable and true ancestry can be difficult to establish. Genome duplication events are estimated to occur at relatively high frequency and can result from somatic doubling of meristematic tissues as well as from zygotes, through polyspermy, when multiple sperm cells fertilize an egg cell. However, the most common mechanism on the way to polyploid formation is probably via unreduced gametes that contain the full somatic chromosome set (2n) (Ramsey and Schemske, 1998). Unreduced gamete formation occurs with an estimated frequency of ~0.5% per gamete, suggesting a high potential for frequent polyploid formation (Ramsey and Schemske, 1998; Brownfield and Köhler, 2011). The double fertilization process in angiosperms requires the formation of haploid (1n) male and female gametes through meiosis. During meiosis I the homologous chromosomes pair and recombine, thus ensuring a genetically diverse progeny, whereas in meiosis II the sister chromatids are separated and, during cytokinesis, split into haploid meiocytes. Both processes are highly complex and abnormalities are likely to result in non-viable gametes. Although a large number of different plant species producing viable 2n gametes have been identified and described (Bretagnolle and Thompson, 1995), our understanding of the underlying molecular mechanisms has only recently advanced with the discovery of meiotic mutants in the dicot model plant Arabidopsis thaliana that form unreduced gametes at high frequency. The genetic constitution of unreduced gametes therefore depends on the meiotic stage at which the defect occurs; mutants impaired in meiosis I produce gametes containing two chromosomes of non-sister chromatids [and are referred to as first division restitution (FDR) mutants]. Gametes formed by a FDR mechanism are highly heterozygous, whereas mutants faulty in meiosis II [second division restitution (SDR) mutants] contain two sister chromatids and therefore show high levels of homozygosity (Brownfield and Köhler, 2011). In the following paragraph, examples are presented for A. thaliana mutants affected at different stages of gametogenesis that produce viable gametes which can result in polyploid offspring. During meiotic prophase I the homologous chromosomes condense, pair, and recombine, orchestrated by several protein complexes, to create bivalents (Osman et al., 2011). A disruption of these processes often leads to the formation of univalents that cannot be separated properly in later stages. The SWI1/DYAD gene is required for sister chromatid cohesion and recombination (Mercier et al., 2001; Agashe et al., 2002) with different swi1/dyad alleles showing different strengths in the effects on female or male gametogenesis. Female meiosis in the dyad allele is mitosis-like, resulting in a low frequency of viable unreduced female FDR gametes that are able to be fertilized by haploid male gametes, resulting in viable triploid seed formation (Siddiqi et al., 2000; Mercier et al., 2001; Ravi et al., 2008). After the completion of meiosis I the meiocytes have to enter meiosis II without undergoing another round of DNA replication. This can only be achieved if the cell cycle progression is tightly controlled by exact fine-tuning of the involved components, specifically cyclin-dependent kinases (CDK) and their activity controlling cofactors, cyclins. Consequently, impaired control of cell cycle progression by loss of A-type cyclin A1;2 (CYCA1;2) activity causes the formation of unreduced gametes. Whereas weak, temperature-sensitive alleles of cycA1;2/tam (tardy asynchronous meiosis) cause a delay in cell cycle progression of male meiocytes, null mutations affect male and, to a lesser extent, female meiosis as well by skipping the second division, resulting in cells that still contain sister chromatids after cytokinesis (Wang et al., 2004, 2010; d’Erfurth et al., 2010). The failure to enter meiosis II and the resulting production of dyads instead of tetrads can also be observed in meiocytes of the osd1 Interploidy hybridizations | 6061 mutant (omission of second division 1) with 100% penetrance for male gametes and 85% for female gametes (d’Erfurth et al., 2009) and, as for cycA1;2/tam mutants, unreduced (SDR) gametes of the osd1 mutants can produce viable triploid or, in case of mating of unreduced male with unreduced female osd1 gametes, tetraploid offspring. Unreduced gametes can also arise through defective spindle orientation during meiosis II when the chromosomes are regrouped prior to their physical separation in cytokinesis. Two mutants with similar nuclear FDR restitution phenotypes have been described so far: ps1 and jas1. Defects in AtPS1 (Arabidopsis thaliana Parallel Spindle 1) and JAS (JASON) lead to abnormally oriented spindles in male meiosis II which are frequently fused or parallel aligned compared with the perpendicular orientation in the wild type (d’Erfurth et al., 2008; Erilova et al., 2009; De Storme and Geelen, 2011). As a consequence of spindle rearrangements chromosomes associated with different spindles are in close physical proximity at the end of anaphase II and are subsequently contained within one cell during cytokinesis. However, in both mutants, female meiosis is not affected as, among the offspring, only diploid and triploid plants were found. Another mechanism leading to the formation of unreduced gametes involves inaccurate meiotic cytokinesis leading to the formation of cells with multiple nuclei as, for example, in tes/ stud mutants (tetraspore/stud). TES/STUD encodes a kinesin and its mutation leads to microtubule disorganization and a disruption of male meiotic cytokinesis. This results in spores that contain four nuclei that can fuse, giving rise to pollen grains with di-, tri or tetraploid nuclei that can produce offspring of different ploidy level (Hülskamp et al., 1997; Spielman et al., 1997; Yang et al., 2003). A common feature of the mutants mentioned above is the production of viable unreduced gametes and viable offspring that differ in ploidy levels from their parents with being mainly tri- or tetraploid, but other ploidy levels might also be observed depending on the type of mutation. These mutants provide powerful tools to investigate the effects and the underlying mechanisms of the generation of polyploid plants. Mechanisms of polyploid formation: hybridization and triploid block As discussed earlier, the formation of polyploid plants from diploid ancestors can arise through auto- or allopolyploidization and mainly involves the generation of unreduced gametes. Simultaneous generation of unreduced male and female gametes (e.g. as can be found in the osd1 mutant; d’Erfurth et al., 2009) could lead to autopolyploid plants and, although rather rare, the spontaneous generation and hybridization of unreduced gametes of different species could lead to allotetraploids (Bretagnolle and Thompson, 1995; Ramsey and Schemske, 1998). By contrast with this one-step mechanism (also called bilateral sexual polyploidization), a two-step mechanism (unilateral sexual polyploidization) that employs an intermediate step generating triploids (therefore called the triploid bridge hypothesis) and their self-fertilization or back-crossing to diploids seems to be the major route to polyploidization (Fig. 1; Ramsey and Schemske, 1998). Due to their unbalanced chromosome number triploids are unstable and will face difficulties during meiosis and only a small fraction of gametes will finally produce tetraploids (Ramsey and Schemske, 1998). To successfully hybridize—either between different species of the same ploidy (homoploid hybridization) or between individuals of different ploidy levels (interploidy hybridizations)— several obstacles need to be overcome, from prezygotic barriers that prevent pollen from fertilizing ovules (e.g. by pollen incompatibility, a profound problem in interspecies hybridizations) to post-zygotic barriers that lead to the arrest of seed development. The formation of triploids requires overcoming the triploid block that often leads to high rates of seed abortion in response to interploidy hybridizations (Marks, 1966; Köhler et al., 2010). For a long time it had been suspected that the endosperm is responsible for the triploid block (Brink and Cooper, 1947). Nevertheless, only in recent years has the mechanistic basis underlying the triploid block begun to be uncovered and the following paragraphs will summarize the insight gained by using the genetic and molecular tools provided by the model species, A. thaliana. Pollen grains of angiosperms contain one vegetative cell and two sperm cells, one of which fertilizes the haploid egg cell to give rise to the embryo and the second sperm cell fertilizes the central cell which gives rise to the endosperm, the tissue that surrounds and nourishes the embryo after fertilization (Costa et al., 2004). In most angiosperms the central cell is homodiploid, resulting in a triploid endosperm. This specific triploid constitution of the endosperm, with two genomes contributed from the maternal parent (2m) and one genome contributed from the paternal parent (1p) is crucial for proper seed development. Any alteration of the endosperm 2m:1p ratio in interploidy crosses is likely to lead to aberrations in endosperm development and therefore to seed abortion, although this is not inevitable and depends on the genetic background (Johnston et al., 1980; Lin, 1984; Scott et al., 1998; Dilkes et al., 2008). The observation that an increase in maternal genome contribution leads to smaller seed size and larger seeds arise through paternal excess, is in agreement with the predictions of the ‘parental conflict theory’ (Haig and Westoby, 1989) or ‘kinship theory’ (Trivers and Burt, 1999), that postulates that increased maternal genome contributions reduces nutrient flow to the embryo whereas increased paternal genome contributions promote nutrient flows to the embryo (Haig and Westoby, 1989). The differences in seed size that accompany unbalanced parental contribution are a result of differences in endosperm development (Fig. 2). Arabidopsis has a nuclear-type endosperm common for most angiosperms in which, after fertilization, the central cell undergoes multiple rounds of nuclear division, resulting in a syncytium, followed by a migration of nuclei to the periphery, around which radial microtubules begin to form (Costa et al., 2004). The micropylar region that surrounds the embryo starts to cellularize first, followed by cellularization in the central endosperm region. Finally, cell walls form around nuclei of the chalazal endosperm (Brown et al., 1999; Berger, 2003). The timing of endosperm cellularization impacts on final seed size and while delayed endosperm cellularization causes enlarged seed formation, early endosperm cellularization correlates with the formation of small seeds (Scott et al., 1998). Interploidy hybridizations in Arabidopsis have opposing effects on the central 6062 | Schatlowski and Köhler Fig. 1. Routes to polyploid formation. (A) Diploid plants give rise to haploid gametes (1n) resulting in diploid offspring (2n). (B) If unreduced gametes (male or female) occur and unite with their haploid counterpart the progeny will be triploid. The gametes arising from those plants can be either haploid (1n), diploid (2n) or aneuploid (1n+z) due to meiotic problems. During fertilization (by either selfing or outcrossing), a number of different gamete combinations are possible including the formation of diploid offspring, therefore restoring the initial wild-type situation. However, unreduced gametes can unite with gametes containing aneuploid chromosome sets (resulting in aneuploid offspring) or with haploid gametes resulting in triploid offspring, both options might lead to viable progeny. If diploid male and female gametes unite, viable tetraploid offspring arises demonstrating that triploid intermediates might serve as bridge to the formation of tetraploids. (C) Unreduced male and female gametes can arise simultaneously giving rise to tetraploid offspring. regulators of endosperm cellularization, the AGAMOUS LIKE (AGL) transcription factor AGL62 and AGLs interacting with AGL62. Whereas delayed endosperm cellularization in paternal excess interploidy hybridizations correlates with increased levels of AGL62 expression, the converse applies in maternal excess interploidy hybridizations (Erilova et al., 2009; Lu et al., 2012). Importantly, maternal loss of AGL62 function can partially suppress the triploid block by restoring endosperm cellularization (Hehenberger et al., 2012), suggesting a central role of deregulated AGL62 expression in executing the triploid block response. Expression levels of AGL62 and interacting AGL genes in response to interploidy crosses have been anticorrelated with 24 nt siRNA (p4-siRNAs) levels in the endosperm (Lu et al., 2012), suggesting that changes in p4-siRNA levels might have a role in the response to interploidy hybridizations. Whereas increased levels of p4-siRNAs in response to maternal genome excess have been correlated with reduced expression of selected AGL genes, decreased levels of p4-siRNAs in response to paternal genome excess have been correlated with increased AGL gene expression. Although attractive, it remains to be investigated whether siRNA levels are indeed causally connected to AGL gene expression levels. Apparently, the genotype of the maternal sporophytic tissue can also modulate the triploid block by impacting on endosperm cellularization. Mutants in the maternal effect transcription factor gene TRANSPARENT TESTA GLABRA2 (TTG2) suppress triploid seed abortion by promoting endosperm cellularization, suggesting a change in signalling molecule release or perception due to the loss of TTG2 (Dilkes et al., 2008). Together, the timing of endosperm cellularization is of crucial importance for viable seed formation. Changes in the timing of endosperm cellularization in response to interploidy hybridizations will cause seed abortion, establishing the endosperm as a tissue promoting species formation by acting as a dosage- sensitive hybridization barrier. Deregulated imprinted genes probably underpin the triploid block response As outlined above, changes in the ratio of parental contributions to the endosperm alter seed size depending on the direction of parental genome excess, suggesting a parent-of-origin effect. Genomic imprinting is an epigenetic phenomenon rendering genes specifically expressed dependent on their parent-of-origin that probably provides the basis for parent-specific effects on progeny development. Therefore, imprinted genes are likely candidates being involved in establishing interploidy hybridization barriers. But, in addition to imprinted genes that have a strong allele-preference in their expression, genes that only have a biased expression of one of the parental alleles could also have a central role in the response to interploidy hybridizations Interploidy hybridizations | 6063 Fig. 2. Model depicting the impact of parental genome dosage on seed development. During the double fertilization of angiosperms, female and male gametes (depicted in the left and middle columns, respectively) unite to give rise to seeds containing the embryo which is surrounded by endosperm (right column). In diploid plants (middle panel) the female gametophyte contains the haploid (1n) egg cell (EC) which is fertilized by one of the two haploid sperm cells (SC) of the male gametophyte to give rise to the diploid (2n) embryo. The homodiploid (2n) central cell (CC) is fertilized by the second sperm cell, giving rise to a triploid (3n) endosperm with a contribution of 2 maternal (m) and 1 paternal (p) genomes. This 2m:1p genome dosage might be required to allow the repression of target genes by the FIS PRC2, e.g. AGL62, a major regulator of endosperm cellularization (Hehenberger et al., 2012). Unreduced female gametes (upper panel) lead to the formation of triploid embryos, but the endosperm contains a genome contribution of 4m:1p. This results in seeds much smaller than wild-type seeds, with early cellularizing endosperm that might be caused by reduced AGL62 expression (Lu et al., 2012). The fertilization of female gametes with unreduced (2n) male gametes (lower panel) also results in triploid embryos (which might be viable or not) and a 2m:2p contribution to the endosperm. These seeds are increased in size and show disturbed embryo development and endosperm cellularization failure (only endosperm nuclei are visible, depicted as dots), probably as a consequence of increased AGL62 expression (Erilova et al., 2009; Hehenberger et al., 2012). Schematic bars depicted in the gametes/seeds represent sets of genomes, with the red bars referring to the female and the blue bars to the male origin. A, antipodal cells; S, synergids. The red dotted lines in the graphs depicting AGL62 expression level symbolize the threshold level of AGL62 required to initiate endosperm cellularization. (Dilkes and Comai, 2004). Two of the very first imprinted genes to be identified in plants were MEA (MEDEA) and FIS2 (FERTILIZATION INDEPENDENT SEED 2), with their expression being restricted to the maternal alleles (Kinoshita et al., 1999; Luo et al., 1999; Vielle-Calzada et al., 1999). MEA and FIS2 inhibit endosperm proliferation in the absence of fertilization and aberration in their activity leads to endosperm overproliferation and delayed cellularization, a phenotype similar to triploid seeds resulting from paternal excess crosses (Chaudhury et al., 1997; Grossniklaus et al., 1998; Kiyosue et al., 1999). The phenotypic similarities correlate with similar transcriptional profiles of fis2 mutant seeds and seeds derived from paternal excess interploidy hybridizations (Erilova et al., 2009; Tiwari et al., 2010), suggesting a connection between deregulated function of MEA and FIS2 and interploidy seed defects. Both proteins are subunits of the evolutionary conserved FIS-PRC2 (Polycomb Repressive Complex 2), a high molecular weight complex that comprises histone methyltransferase activity by depositing a trimethyl group on lysine 27 of histone H3 (H3K27me3). This epigenetic mark can be recognized by downstream protein complexes which are implicated in the long-term maintenance of repressed states of gene expression of their target genes. PRC2s of different subcomponent composition have been found to be necessary in different tissues and at different stages of the plant 6064 | Schatlowski and Köhler life cycle, respectively, with the FIS PRC2 being endosperm-specific (Hennig and Derkacheva, 2009) resulting in a derepression of PRC2 target genes in the endosperm (Erilova et al., 2009). Expression of MEA and FIS2 is altered in response to paternal excess interploidy hybridizations, however, expression changes are accession-dependent, with MEA expression being increased in Landsberg erecta (Ler) while decreased in Columbia (Col) and the converse holds true for FIS2 expression (Erilova et al., 2009; Jullien and Berger, 2010). Notably, both accessions strongly differ in their response to interploidy hybridizations, with the Col accession reacting more severely to increased paternal genome dosage compared with the Ler accession (Dilkes et al., 2008). Therefore, whether regulatory differences in MEA and FIS2 expression are cause or consequence of accession-dependent interploidy responses remains to be investigated. While there are differences between diverse Arabidopsis accessions in response to interploidy crosses, deregulation of FIS PRC2 target genes seems to be a general phenomenon that is probably responsible for the developmental abnormalities in the endosperm (Erilova et al., 2009; Jullien and Berger, 2010, N Schatlowski, unpublished data). To decipher the underlying mechanisms causing deregulation of FIS PRC2 target genes in response to interploidy crosses remains a challenge of future investigations. Imprinted genes are among those FIS PRC2 target genes that are deregulated in response to paternal excess interploidy hybridizations (Wolff et al., 2011), suggesting that deregulated imprinted genes play a central role in the interploidy response. This notion is supported by the fact that many imprinted paternally expressed genes encode chromatin modifying proteins, which often act in multimeric complexes and are, therefore, prone to be sensitive to misbalanced genome dosage (Birchler et al., 2001). Interploidy and interspecies post-zygotic hybridization barriers that act in the endosperm might involve the same mechanism Seed defects in response to diploid interspecies crosses are often strikingly similar to defects observed in response to interploidy crosses (Haig and Westoby, 1991). Interspecies hybridizations can often be rendered compatible by increasing the ploidy of one parent (Johnston et al., 1980), suggesting that interspecies crossing barriers are built by quantitative rather than qualitative genetic differences. If this hypothesis is true, interspecies and interploidy hybridization barriers that are established in the endosperm should have a common mechanistic basis. This view is supported by work revealing that, in response to hybridization of A. thaliana with the closely related diploid variety of A. arenosa, similar sets of AGL transcription factors become deregulated as in response to interploidy crosses in A. thaliana (Erilova et al., 2009; Walia et al., 2009). By increasing the ploidy of the maternal A. thaliana parent, viable seed formation can be restored upon hybridizations with A. arenosa (Josefsson et al., 2006), suggesting that a limiting factor contributed by the maternal A. thaliana parent is required to restore viable seed formation. Viable seed formation could also be promoted by maternal loss of function of the central endosperm regulator AGL62 and its interacting partners AGL90 and PHERES1 (Josefsson et al., 2006; Walia et al., 2009). As mentioned before, loss of AGL62 can also suppress interploidy seed abortion in A. thaliana (Hehenberger et al., 2012), pointing towards a common mechanistic basis of interploidy and interspecies hybridization barriers. Recent data have revealed a complex genetic network being involved in controlling the interspecies hybridization barrier between A. thaliana and A. arenosa (Burkart-Waco et al., 2012). In this study, different Arabidopsis accessions were tested for the ability to rescue hybrid seed abortion and revealed a large set of minor-effect loci from the maternal Arabidopsis genome controlling hybrid growth and viability. Whether the same loci play a role in regulating the triploid block response remains to be investigated. Consequences of polyploidy for plant evolution Since the middle of the last century, polyploidy has been widely recognized as an important mechanism of plant speciation (Stebbins, 1950; Grant, 1981; Soltis and Soltis, 2000). It has been generally assumed that polyploidy results in modified global patterns of gene expression and is a major source of developmental novelty (Osborn et al., 2003; Adams, 2007). In agreement with this view, there have been two whole genome duplication events in ancestral lineages shortly before the diversification of extant seed plants and angiosperms. As a consequence of ancestral whole genome duplications regulatory genes important to seed and flower development diversified and probably contributed to the rise and eventual dominance of seed plants and angiosperms (Jiao et al., 2011). This view, however, is contrasted by studies revealing that polyploid speciation rates are significantly lower than those of diploid species (Wood et al., 2009; Mayrose et al., 2011). Instead, it has been estimated that about 15% of speciation events are accompanied by a ploidy increase (Wood et al., 2009), implying that the widespread occurrence of polyploid taxa is a consequence of the high rate of polyploid formation, rather than a result of subsequent increases in diversification rates of polyploid lines (Wood et al., 2009; Mayrose et al., 2011). The sudden rise of angiosperms in the mid-Cretaceous was referred to by Charles Darwin as ‘an abominable mystery’, as the underlying mechanisms that might have caused the rapid radiation of angiosperms remained a mystery in his time. We propose that the high rate of speciation events in response to polyploidization is a consequence of instantly erected reproductive barriers in the endosperm in response to polyploidization that will successfully prevent backcrossing of the newly established polyploid plant with its progenitor. These reproductive barriers are likely to be built by misbalanced contributions of dosage-sensitive regulators that will cause endosperm developmental failure and seed abortion. Dosage sensitivity could arise as a consequence of genomic imprinting, suggesting that a subset of imprinted genes could act as speciation genes. Nevertheless, the most frequent route to polyploid formation is probably through unreduced gametes and individuals with irregular chromosome numbers (Bretagnolle and Thompson, 1995; Interploidy hybridizations | 6065 Ramsey and Schemske, 1998), suggesting that post-zygotic hybridization barriers in response to interploidy hybridizations can be overcome, albeit at low frequency. Whether this survival frequency is modulated by environmental factors remains to be investigated. Conclusion Recent years have witnessed a dramatic increase in our understanding of how polyploidy has contributed to diversification and speciation. New quantitative assessments of polyploid speciation and extinction rates provided the first quantitative verification of the ‘dead-end hypothesis’ proposed by Stebbins more than 40 years ago (Stebbins, 1971). Accordingly, the high incidence of polyploid plants seems to be a consequence of diploids speciating frequently via polyploidy rather than a general advantage of polyploids. Only particularly fit lineages of polyploids may persist and become evolutionary successful. Thus, the most prevailing question to be addressed in the near future concerns the underlying mechanism(s) of polyploidy-mediated plant speciation. In particular, to unravel the genetic basis of interploidy hybridization barriers underpinning polyploidy-mediated plant speciation will foster our understanding of mechanisms driving plant evolution. In addition, this knowledge will pave the ground for designing genetic strategies to overcome interploidy hybridization barriers, holding immense potential for plant breeding. Finally, genes establishing interploidy-hybridization barriers might as well be responsible for establishing interspecies hybridization barriers; this hypothesis remains to be tested. References Adams KL. 2007. Evolution of duplicate gene expression in polyploid and hybrid plants. Journal of Heredity 98, 136–141. Adams KL, Cronn R, Percifield R, Wendel JF. 2003. Genes duplicated by polyploidy show unequal contributions to the transcriptome and organ-specific reciprocal silencing. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 100, 4649–4654. Agashe B, Prasad CK, Siddiqi I. 2002. Identification and analysis of DYAD: a gene required for meiotic chromosome organisation and female meiotic progression in Arabidopsis. Development 129, 3935–3943. Berger F. 2003. Endosperm: the crossroad of seed development. Current Opinion in Plant Biology 6, 42–50. Birchler JA, Bhadra U, Bhadra MP, Auger DL. 2001. Dosagedependent gene regulation in multicellular eukaryotes: implications for dosage compensation, aneuploid syndromes, and quantitative traits. Developmental Biology 234, 275–288. Brownfield L, Köhler C. 2011. Unreduced gamete formation in plants: mechanisms and prospects. Journal of Experimental Botany 62, 1659–1668. Burkart-Waco D, Josefsson C, Dilkes B, Kozloff N, Torjek O, Meyer R, Altmann T, Comai L. 2012. Hybrid incompatibility in Arabidopsis is determined by a multiple-locus genetic network. Plant Physiology 158, 801–812. Chaudhury, A. M, Ming, L, Miller, C, Craig, S, Dennis, E. S, Peacock, W. J. 1997. Fertilization-independent seed development in Arabidopsis thaliana. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 94, 4223–4228. Chen ZJ. 2010. Molecular mechanisms of polyploidy and hybrid vigor. Trends in Plant Science 15, 57–71. Comai L. 2005. The advantages and disadvantages of being polyploid. Nature Reviews Genetics 6, 836–846. Costa LM, Gutierrez-Marcos JF, Dickinson HG. 2004. More than a yolk: the short life and complex times of the plant endosperm. Trends in Plant Science 9, 507–514. d’Erfurth I, Jolivet S, Froger N, Catrice O, Novatchkova M, Mercier R. 2009. Turning meiosis into mitosis. PLoS Biology 7, e1000124. d’Erfurth I, Jolivet S, Froger N, Catrice O, Novatchkova M, Simon M, Jenczewski E, Mercier R. 2008. Mutations in AtPS1 (Arabidopsis thaliana parallel spindle 1) lead to the production of diploid pollen grains. PLoS Genetics 4, e1000274. d’Erfurth I, Cromer L, Jolivet S, Girard C, Horlow C, Sun Y, To JP, Berchowitz LE, Copenhaver GP, Mercier R. 2010. The cyclin-A CYCA1;2/TAM is required for the meiosis I to meiosis II transition and cooperates with OSD1 for the prophase to first meiotic division transition. PLoS Genetics 6, e1000989. De Storme N, Geelen D. 2011. The Arabidopsis mutant jason produces unreduced first division restitution male gametes through a parallel/fused spindle mechanism in meiosis II. Plant Physiology 155, 1403–1415. Dilkes BP, Comai L. 2004. A differential dosage hypothesis for parental effects in seed development. The Plant Cell 16, 3174–3180. Dilkes BP, Spielman M, Weizbauer R, Watson B, Burkart-Waco D, Scott RJ, Comai L. 2008. The maternally expressed WRKY transcription factor TTG2 controls lethality in interploidy crosses of Arabidopsis. PLoS Biology 6, 2707–2720. Erilova A, Brownfield L, Exner V, Rosa M, Twell D, Mittelsten Scheid O, Hennig L, Köhler C. 2009. Imprinting of the polycomb group gene MEDEA serves as a ploidy sensor in Arabidopsis. PLoS Genetics 5, e1000663. Bretagnolle F, Thompson JD. 1995. Gametes with the somatic chromosome number: mechanisms of their formation and role in the evolution of autopolyploid plants. New Phytologist 129, 1–22. Fawcett JA, Maere S, Van de Peer Y. 2009. Plants with double genomes might have had a better chance to survive the Cretaceous– Tertiary extinction event. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 106, 5737–5742. Brink RA, Cooper DC. 1947. The endosperm in seed development. Botanical Reviews 13, 423–477. Grant V. 1981. Plant speciation. New York: Columbia University Press. Brown RC, Lemmon BE, Nguyen H, Olsen OA. 1999. Development of endosperm in Arabidopsis thaliana. Sexual Plant Reproduction 12, 32–42. Grossniklaus U, Vielle-Calzada JP, Hoeppner MA, Gagliano WB. 1998. Maternal control of embryogenesis by MEDEA, a polycomb group gene in Arabidopsis. Science 280, 446–450. 6066 | Schatlowski and Köhler Haig D, Westoby M. 1989. Parent-specific gene-expression and the triploid endosperm. American Naturalist 134, 147–155. Lynch M, Force A. 2000. The probability of duplicate gene preservation by subfunctionalization. Genetics 154, 459–473. Haig D, Westoby M. 1991. Genomic imprinting in endosperm: its effect on seed development in crosses between species, and between different ploidies of the same species, and its implications for the evolution of apomixis. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society London, Series B-Biological Sciences 333, 1–13. Mallet J. 2007. Hybrid speciation. Nature 446, 279–283. Marks GE. 1966. Origin and significance of intraspecific polyploidy: experimental evidence from Solanum chacoense. Evolution 20, 552–557. Hegarty MJ, Hiscock SJ. 2008. Genomic clues to the evolutionary success of polyploid plants. Current Biology 18, R435–444. Matzke MA, Florian Mette M, Kanno T, Matzke AJM. 2003. Does the intrinsic instability of aneuploid genomes have a causal role in cancer? Trends in Genetics 19, 253–256. Hehenberger E, Kradolfer D, Köhler C. 2012. Endosperm cellularization defines an important developmental transition for embryo development. Development 139, 2031–2039. Mayrose I, Zhan SH, Rothfels CJ, Magnuson-Ford K, Barker MS, Rieseberg LH, Otto SP. 2011. Recently formed polyploid plants diversify at lower rates. Science 333, 1257. Hennig L, Derkacheva M. 2009. Diversity of Polycomb group complexes in plants: same rules, different players? Trends in Genetics 25, 414–423. Mercier R, Vezon D, Bullier E, Motamayor JC, Sellier A, Lefevre F, Pelletier G, Horlow C. 2001. SWITCH1 (SWI1): a novel protein required for the establishment of sister chromatid cohesion and for bivalent formation at meiosis. Genes and Development 15, 1859–1871. Henry IM, Dilkes BP, Comai L. 2007. Genetic basis for dosage sensitivity in Arabidopsis thaliana. PLoS Genetics 3, e70. Hulskamp M, Parekh NS, Grini P, Schneitz K, Zimmermann I, Lolle SJ, Pruitt RE. 1997. The STUD gene is required for malespecific cytokinesis after telophase II of meiosis in Arabidopsis thaliana. Developmental Biology 187, 114–124. Jiao Y, Wickett NJ, Ayyampalayam S, et al. 2011. Ancestral polyploidy in seed plants and angiosperms. Nature 473, 97–100. Johnston SA, Dennijs TPM, Peloquin SJ, Hanneman RE. 1980. The significance of genic balance to endosperm development in interspecific crosses. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 57, 5–9. Josefsson C, Dilkes B, Comai L. 2006. Parent-dependent loss of gene silencing during interspecies hybridization. Current Biology 16, 1322–1328. Jullien PE, Berger F. 2010. Parental genome dosage imbalance deregulates imprinting in Arabidopsis. PLoS Genetics 6, e1000885. Kinoshita T, Yadegari R, Harada JJ, Goldberg RB, Fischer RL. 1999. Imprinting of the MEDEA polycomb gene in the Arabidopsis endosperm. The Plant Cell 11, 1945–1952. Kiyosue T, Ohad N, Yadegari R, et al. 1999. Control of fertilizationindependent endosperm development by the MEDEA polycomb gene in Arabidopsis. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 96, 4186–4191. Köhler C, Mittelsten Scheid O, Erilova A. 2010. The impact of the triploid block on the origin and evolution of polyploid plants. Trends in Genetics 26, 142–148. Koltunow AM, Grossniklaus U. 2003. Apomixis: a developmental perspective. Annual Review of Plant Biology 54, 547–574. Lin BY. 1984. Ploidy barrier to endosperm development in maize. Genetics 107, 103–115. Lu J, Zhang C, Baulcombe DC, Chen ZJ. 2012. Maternal siRNAs as regulators of parental genome imbalance and gene expression in endosperm of Arabidopsis seeds. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 109, 5529–5534. Luo M, Bilodeau P, Koltunow A, Dennis ES, Peacock WJ, Chaudhury AM. 1999. Genes controlling fertilization-independent seed development in Arabidopsis thaliana. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 96, 296–301. Osborn TC, Pires JC, Birchler JA, et al. 2003. Understanding mechanisms of novel gene expression in polyploids. Trends in Genetics 19, 141–147. Osman K, Higgins JD, Sanchez-Moran E, Armstrong SJ, Franklin FC. 2011. Pathways to meiotic recombination in Arabidopsis thaliana. New Phytologist 190, 523–544. Oswald BP, Nuismer SL. 2011. A unified model of autopolyploid establishment and evolution. American Naturalist 178, 687–700. Papp I, Iglesias VA, Moscone EA, Michalowski S, Spiker S, Park YD, Matzke MA, Matzke AJ. 1996. Structural instability of a transgene locus in tobacco is associated with aneuploidy. The Plant Journal 10, 469–478. Ramsey J, Schemske DW. 1998. Pathways, mechanisms, and rates of polyploid formation in flowering plants. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 29, 467–501. Ramsey J, Schemske DW. 2002. Neopolyploidy in flowering plants. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 33, 589–639. Ravi M, Marimuthu MP, Siddiqi I. 2008. Gamete formation without meiosis in Arabidopsis. Nature 451, 1121–1124. Scott RJ, Spielman M, Bailey J, Dickinson HG. 1998. Parentof-origin effects on seed development in Arabidopsis thaliana. Development 125, 3329–3341. Siddiqi I, Ganesh G, Grossniklaus U, Subbiah V. 2000. The dyad gene is required for progression through female meiosis in Arabidopsis. Development 127, 197–207. Soltis DE, Bell CD, Kim S, Soltis PS. 2008. Origin and early evolution of angiosperms. Annals of the New York Academy of Science 1133, 3–25. Soltis PS, Soltis DE. 2000. The role of genetic and genomic attributes in the success of polyploids. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 97, 7051–7057. Spielman M, Preuss D, Li FL, Browne WE, Scott RJ, Dickinson HG. 1997. TETRASPORE is required for male meiotic cytokinesis in Arabidopsis thaliana. Development 124, 2645–2657. Stebbins GL. 1971. Chromosomal evolution in higher plants. London: Edward Arnold. Interploidy hybridizations | 6067 Stebbins Jr GL. 1950. Variation and evolution in plants. New York: Columbia University Press. by an A-type cyclin predominately expressed in prophase I. Plant Physiology 136, 4127–4135. Tiwari S, Spielman M, Schulz R, Oakey RJ, Kelsey G, Salazar A, Zhang K, Pennell R, Scott RJ. 2010. Transcriptional profiles underlying parent-of-origin effects in seeds of Arabidopsis thaliana. BMC Plant Biology 10, 72. Wang YX, Jha AK, Chen RJ, Doonan JH, Yang M. 2010. Polyploidy-associated genomic instability in Arabidopsis thaliana. Genesis 48, 254–263. Trivers R, Burt A. 1999. Kinship and genomic imprinting. Results and Problems in Cell Differentiation 25, 1–21. Vielle-Calzada JP, Thomas J, Spillane C, Coluccio A, Hoeppner MA, Grossniklaus U. 1999. Maintenance of genomic imprinting at the Arabidopsis medea locus requires zygotic DDM1 activity. Genes and Development 13, 2971–2982. Walia H, Josefsson C, Dilkes B, Kirkbride R, Harada J, Comai L. 2009. Dosage-dependent deregulation of an AGAMOUS-LIKE gene cluster contributes to interspecific incompatibility. Current Biology 19, 1128–1132. Wang Y, Magnard J-L, McCormick S, Yang M. 2004. Progression through meiosis I and meiosis II in Arabidopsis anthers is regulated Wolff P, Weinhofer I, Seguin J, Roszak P, Beisel C, Donoghue MT, Spillane C, Nordborg M, Rehmsmeier M, Köhler C. 2011. High-resolution analysis of parent-of-origin allelic expression in the Arabidopsis endosperm. PLoS Genetics 7, e1002126. Wood TE, Takebayashi N, Barker MS, Mayrose I, Greenspoon PB, Rieseberg LH. 2009. The frequency of polyploid speciation in vascular plants. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 106, 13875–13879. Yang CY, Spielman M, Coles JP, Li Y, Ghelani S, Bourdon V, Brown RC, Lemmon BE, Scott RJ, Dickinson HG. 2003. TETRASPORE encodes a kinesin required for male meiotic cytokinesis in Arabidopsis. The Plant Journal 34, 229–240.