Download Lecture 13

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts

Skewed X-inactivation wikipedia , lookup

Polycomb Group Proteins and Cancer wikipedia , lookup

Polyploid wikipedia , lookup

Medical genetics wikipedia , lookup

Saethre–Chotzen syndrome wikipedia , lookup

RNA-Seq wikipedia , lookup

Gene desert wikipedia , lookup

Gene nomenclature wikipedia , lookup

Gene therapy wikipedia , lookup

NEDD9 wikipedia , lookup

Epistasis wikipedia , lookup

Genome evolution wikipedia , lookup

Vectors in gene therapy wikipedia , lookup

Pharmacogenomics wikipedia , lookup

Polymorphism (biology) wikipedia , lookup

Human genetic variation wikipedia , lookup

Genetic engineering wikipedia , lookup

Genomic imprinting wikipedia , lookup

Behavioural genetics wikipedia , lookup

Gene wikipedia , lookup

Quantitative trait locus wikipedia , lookup

History of genetic engineering wikipedia , lookup

Epigenetics of human development wikipedia , lookup

Twin study wikipedia , lookup

Hardy–Weinberg principle wikipedia , lookup

Site-specific recombinase technology wikipedia , lookup

Gene expression profiling wikipedia , lookup

Genetic drift wikipedia , lookup

Genome-wide association study wikipedia , lookup

Public health genomics wikipedia , lookup

Artificial gene synthesis wikipedia , lookup

X-inactivation wikipedia , lookup

Gene expression programming wikipedia , lookup

Dominance (genetics) wikipedia , lookup

Nutriepigenomics wikipedia , lookup

Heritability of IQ wikipedia , lookup

Biology and consumer behaviour wikipedia , lookup

Population genetics wikipedia , lookup

Designer baby wikipedia , lookup

Genome (book) wikipedia , lookup

Microevolution wikipedia , lookup

Transcript
PSYC 3102: Introduction to Behavioral Genetics
Lecture 13
Association Studies

How a gene relates to a trait

2 kinds: Pop’n Based and Family Based

Population-based designs – controls are from the general population
o Get people with disorder (ex: major affect disorder), then get controls
o Then genotype for particular gene or genes (like serotonin transporter)
o Conclude if that locus is associated with MAD
(ex. Short and long forms because of a repeat polymorphism)
phenotype
ADHD
SS
SL
10
LL
Total
35
55
100
40
40
100
(# of people)
Control
20
o Easy to conduct
o But population stratification is a problem – allele frequencies are associated with
sub-populations; allel frequencies can be associated with ethnicity
Example:
phenotype
Sickle cell
Normal
Skin Pigmentation Gene
LL
DL
DD
Low-Zero
High Number
High Number
Total
100
100
But skin pigmentation does NOT have any kind of causal relationship with the disease!!
- vast majority of sickle cell individuals have African ancestry

Family-based designs – use genetic relatives as controls
o This avoids problems of ethnicity and population stratification
o Often use siblings as controls
Example:
Family MAD sibling Normal sibling #L in ADHD - #L in normal
Smith
LL
SL
2–1=1
Jones
SL
SS
1–0=1
Etc.

If there is no association, the mean of the last column should be about 0

If mean of last column is >0; L allele confers risk

If mean is <0; S allele confers risk

Much more difficult to execute these studies
Discussion of Article
Comments of Class:








Very vague
Unnecessary N vs. N debate
Not enough mention of environment
Learn to control behavior
Biased to Nature, but courts are currently very Nurture-biased
Test for gene only after crime is committed??? Or before?
Not full penetrance
Prediction and prevention… false positives

What about male/female differences in aggression?
Family
Criminal
Normal
Smith
XY
XX
# of Y
chromosomes
1–0=1
Jones
XY
XX
1–0=1
Etc.












9 to 1 ratio of men to women with violent crimes
In this sense the Y chromosome has a VERY high association with violent crimes, it is a
genetic marker in this sense
But, does the Y chromosome cause crime?????
This is just a statistical association
HOW do genes and environment interact?
Y is a predictor, but not the whole picture
Association studies don’t tell you HOW!!
Case by case
Issues of genetic discrimination; examples: cancer and insurances; lay persons interpretations
Fragile X child example – hit sibling with a bat, caused major brain damage – do you treat
that child the same? Or based on genes?
Can treat differently without being more lenient
What is sentencing designed to do? Rehabilitate or Stop from recurring or Retribution?