Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Extracellular matrix wikipedia , lookup
Cell nucleus wikipedia , lookup
Cellular differentiation wikipedia , lookup
Cell culture wikipedia , lookup
Cell membrane wikipedia , lookup
Cell growth wikipedia , lookup
Organ-on-a-chip wikipedia , lookup
Cytokinesis wikipedia , lookup
Cell Analogy Rubric – Honors Biology GROUP MEMBERS: Animal Cell The Cells as a(n) ___________________________. Assessment Standard Points Earned I. Content Standard: Analyze the relationship between cell structures & functions (Each box is worth 1 point.) Structure Present Function Metaphor Present Metaphor Explained 55 points Metaphor Appropriate Nucleus Nuclear Membrane Chromatin ER Golgi Apparatus Lysosomes Cytoskeleton Ribosomes Mitochondria Cell Membrane Centriole Total II. Self-direction in creating an authentic project (Each criterion is worth 2 points.) 1. Creation of individual page on group wiki 2. Initial post of idea cell analogy idea on individual page 3. You are a participant in the group video – have to be on camera at least once. 8 points III. Use of creative thinking (Each criterion is worth 5 points.) 1. Analogy is creative and not like an example given in class (ie. Cell as a school, cell as a family). 2. Costumes are incorporated into the video presentation 10 points IV. Demonstrate technology standard NETS-S: 4, 6 15 points Cell Analogy Rubric – Honors Biology (Configure and troubleshoot hardware, software, and network systems to optimize their use for learning and productivity.) (Each 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. criterion is worth 3 points) Video has good picture quality Video has good sound quality Everyone in group participated in the video Video is edited via the camera or other software Background music accompanies non-speaking parts V. Demonstrate collaboration among group members to complete project (Each criterion is worth 3 points) 1. Creation of group wiki 2. Invite instructor by email to be a member of wiki 3. Each member commented on each other’s idea for the video presentation during the planning period 4. Members collaborated equally in the development of the video Total Possible: Comments: 12 points 100 points