Download Lessons learned from the 2000s Western drought: Evolving linkages between

Lessons learned from the 2000s Western
drought: Evolving linkages between
research and services
CLIVAR, 22 October, 2008
Lincoln, Nebraska
Andrea J. Ray,
NOAA Earth Systems Research Laboratory
and CU-NOAA Western Water Assessment
[email protected]
With contributions from the WWA team: Roger Pulwarty, Doug
Kenney, Chris Goemans, Bobbie Klein, Brad Udall, Jess Lowery,
etc…
And of course to our many opinionated stakeholders…
Western Water Assessment
http://sciencepolicy.colorado/wwa
Overview and Summary points
•
What is drought as a service need -- drought vs “climate”
•
What WWA has learned from the 2000s western drought -- a history of WWA projects
–
Role of interactions in shaping research and experimental services
–
Three cases
–
Front Range Municipalities
–
Reclamation Reservoir Management
–
State Water Adaptation Planning : the Colorado Climate change Report
•
What drought/climate information was used, what users wanted/needed, and our
inferences
•
Drought risk management
•
–
More than just the right products, and occurs in a dialogue about risks
–
What are the spaces for interaction for these scientist-stakeholder dialogues, both on products
and for services?
–
Understanding the nature of risk and information/knowledge needed to manage risk
–
Managing drought in the context of changing climate -- adaptation strategies
Role of social sciences??
What is “drought” as a service need??
• Problem Identification: drought vs climate
– Drought not an issue itself, but as it relates to other water problems
– Role of perception, Spring of 2005
• “The drought is over, time for a flood??” Salt Lake City Tribune, April 12
2005; “The drought is over,” Utah Center for Weather and Climate, based
on the Drought Monitor
• Lake Powell then at 37%
• Irony of risk of a call on the river,
even if Utah flooded that spring
• D0, D1…DX don’t always
correspond to managers’ own
perception of drought and how it
relates to variables critical to them
• Illustrates time & space scales of
risk and information
• Prompted EIS on reservoir
operations
Assessing drought
•
Context for drought information needs
•
Who determines water shortage and how: individuals, managers of
overlapping resources/areas, political dimension
•
Information available to assess conditions is distributed across multiple
agency webpages, may not be easily evaluated on spatial scales of interest
•
Social monitoring of drought:
– Organizations and individuals assess drought according to their own
jurisdictions
– Drought Task Forces
– Reservoir and basin management groups
– Basin councils
– Related resource management groups
• Environmental, irrigation
– Managers’ own perception of drought may not link to drought status
•
Long-term policies that must be able to respond to drought: EIS for Lakes
Powell and Mead; municipal/state water planning
Regional Integrated Science & Assessment
contributions
•
WWA is one of 9 regional programs
•
Empirical studies
•
Decision studies of water management and
agriculture
– Characterize decisions and decisionmakers
– Institutional/legal opportunities/constraints
– Organizational/behavioral opportunities/constraints
•
Experiments in communicating with stakeholders
•
Understanding user needs
– Perception, cognitive, communications studies
•
Experiments in creating and maintaining
partnerships over time
– Reservoir management, drought task forces, climate
change and state water supply planning
•
WWA experiences and cases
What WWA has learned from interactions in the 2000s drought
•
Pre-WWA workshops
– Established connections with key water management communities; ‘97-98 El Nino and ‘99
La Nina prompt interest in seasonal forecasts
•
1st WWA workshop, summer 1999
– Focus on seasonal forecast use; river management to support ESA ID’d as key issue
•
Reservoir management workshops, 2 basins, 1999-2000
– CBRFC connection; Ray work on decision process; Clark et al. river forecast work --> week
2 forecast applications
– Ongoing participation in basin technical working groups (USBR, CRWCD, SEO, etc)
•
2002 Drought -- Rapid Response activities
– Climate info sheets; regular participation in the Colorado Water Availability Task Force;
Kenney and Klein studies of municipal drought plans; study w/ CSU-Extension on ag
responses and decisions
– Drought focussed interest, but a big question was whether representative droughts used in
planning were reasonable
– Interest in paleoclimate reconstructions --> training workshops (Woodhouse)
– -->shift in the kinds of research done, more science collaborators brought in
•
Intermountain West Climate Summary started, 8x/year
– climate literacy and dialogue
•
WY2005 Colorado Basin Outlook briefing, SLC, Nov 2004
– Need coordinated message, don’t argue the science at a stakeholder briefing
– Well attended, interest in, request for future meetings
What WWA has learned (cont)
• 2005 and 2006 Colorado and WY climate workshops
– Increasing interest in climate change; Interest in demand side management as
an adaptation strategy; increasing focus to municipal management and climate
change
• 2006/7
– Ongoing low flows into Lakes Powell and Mead prompt USBR “Shortage EIS”
– Policy processes again confirmed as an focusing “event: and entry point for
climate information
• 2007/8 WY
– Regional “on the ground” drought lessens, but interests in climate change
snowballing
– Need for regional information specific to broad sector needs
• Front range municipalities commission a climate change scenarios study
• Denver water hires a climatologist
• CLIVAR applications post-doc -- higher than expected interest
– Governor’s conference on mitigating risks…& Colorado Climate Report
– Interest in climate change information is beyond what the science can or is ready
to provide
Front Range Municipalities
Study
Northern
Boulder
Westminster
Denver
Aurora
Colorado Springs
• Uses of climate information & forecasts
Factors affecting use
• Six Front Range water providers: Northern Colorado Water
Conservancy District, Boulder, Westminster, Denver, Colorado Springs,
and Aurora
• Serve about 60% of Colorado’s population
Context:
• Interactions with WWA and other climate information providers since
1998
• Drought in 2002
• Different contexts for growth, water supply reliability; use change, etc
Sensitivity of water supply
Drought of 2002-2006 +
Popn growth and use changes
Perception of risk
•
•
•
Perception of higher risk,
coupled with higher
sensitivity of water supply to
climate variability increases
the desire to use climate
information and forecasts.
A severe drought led to
perception of higher risk,
and water managers sought
out climate knowledge from
WWA and others.
Climate literacy, plus
perception of higher risk,
and institutional capacity led
these water managers to seek
out and use new climate
information and forecasts –and
.
Interactions
with WWA
Climate literacy
Institutional capacity
Use of climate
information
and forecasts
Drought & USBR reservoir management
• Implications of hydroclimatic variability are increasingly important for
water management
• Hydrologic predictions have great potential for integrated and
adaptive management
– operations and long-range planning
• A key factor in the use of hydrologic predictions is the institutional
capacity to use this information effectively
• Studies of “adaptive capacity” indicate that collective action, indicated
by networks and social capital, are a key factor in the ability to cope
with climate change (Adger, 2003 and others)
•
Case study of adaptive capacity of the USBR Aspinall Unit, one of 4 major
projects of the Colorado River Storage Project
Coping with the 2002 drought
•
Runoff forecasts, flows, well below 50% average across the Gunnison basin,
forecasted well ahead of the runoff season based on snowpack
– Seasonal inflow into Aspinall was the lowest on record
•
Managers implemented previous agreements for dry years and developed new
ones “in real time”
– Drought provision triggered in the Interim Contract for fish water, however, managers
recognized early in the season that fish wouldn’t be protected
– Developed a new agreement among participants to ameliorate recognized problem
• conserved storage and kept water in the river for fish
• unlikely without existing trust and cooperation
– US Fish and Wildlife (FWS) agreed to shorten operations at the fish ladder
to conserve water; lowered in stream flows; shared shortage
– No peak augmentation requested by FWS or NPS
– Upper Gunnison Water Conservancy District (UGRWCD) small contracts
helped their constituents
Coping with the 2002 drought, cont.
•
•
•
Actions allowed reservoir managers to provide water for more uses
than under formal operating criteria
– Supplies stretched out into the summer due to storage conserved
earlier
– Uncompahgre Valley Water Users Assn. didn’t get a full allocation
for the first time ever, but gave 70% ration to users
– Life-sustaining flows for endangered fish in the critical reach
Flows for fish were acknowledged to have other benefits: water quality,
trout and trout-fishing, rafting/boating
Relatively little conflict, many participants acknowledged help and
cooperation of other organizations
In contrast to the rigid constraints found in other systems, operations here
are often adjusted for a variety of reasons, revealing flexibility &
adaptability in operations and a collaborative management structure
that seeks adaptive solutions
Climate information is one factor in this adaptive capacity, but the
institutional capacity to interpret and respond is crucial
Current uses of information
for reservoir management
• NOAA/CPC forecasts incorporated in reservoir inflow forecasts and also
considered independently by managers
• Efforts to improve use of climate forecasts in river forecasts
• But -- often little skill in the Upper Basin where most supply originates
• Drought of record used in planning: 1955-1967 (12yrs); Variability in natural flow
into reservoirs Lake Powell 1906 - 2003, index sequencing in operations models
• Interest in longer records of variability:
• Paleoclimate research (Woodhouse et al. new reconstruction for Lee’s Ferry,
May 2006 Water Resources Research)
• Reconstructed hydrology -- New methodologies to combine paleo
reconstructions of flow with historic gauge data (Rajagopalan et al.)
• USBR, Denver Water, others, conducting modeling and planning studies
based on these studies
• --> Paleoclimate reconstructions on the verge of being “standard” information
Current uses of climate information in
municipal water supply management
• Use of the instrumental record of hydro-climate variables in
planning and operations models
• The use of climate influenced hydro-climate parameters to
generate projections of streamflow, reservoir contents, or water
supply
– SWE, historic records of streamflow, water year precipitation
• Use of paleoclimate data, e.g. reconstructions of SWE or
streamflow
• Use of forecasts of climate variables, e.g., precipitation or
temperature, such as the NOAA/CPC Monthly and Seasonal
Climate Forecasts, or medium-range weather forecasts
 Climate variability reflected in annual and longer term operations
in ways other than use of forecasts
Perspectives from user studies: Users needs
Longer-range questions
• Increasing requests for information on interannual and decadal time scales
(+ 5, 10, 15 years)
• Reservoir inflows over several years (at least 2)
• Drought outlooks over the next decade
• Are the historical droughts of record still a valid planning tool?
• Are return periods for flooding still valid?
•Interest in assessments: range of potential climate change scenarios,
droughts that have occurred outside the instrumental record
•“Can we produce reliable baselines for planning given large year to year
and decade to decade variations?”
•“Are the assumptions of planning borne out under projections of
varying and changing climates?”
• e.g. 1906 Rio Grande treaty definition of “extra-ordinary drought”
invoked 14 times over the last 50 years
•“Do present simulations of change adequately represent modes of
variations (ENSO, NAO, PDO etc.) ?”
How drought information might be used:
WWA observations
• “Conversation” within water management groups and with their
stakeholders, and with scientists -- dialogue about risks
• Mental models of managers for their systems are important as
well as hydrologic and management models
• Relationship of information to their triggers, thresholds
• As interested in the information behind the Drought Monitor as
the DM itself, in order to make their own assessments
• Synthesis of research into products & analysis that connect
climate impacts to water management impacts:
Temperature --> evaporation, rain/snow mix, urban demand,
length of growing season
Timing of spring runoff --> water rights, reservoir reliability
Synchroneity --> diversity of supply sources
Climate Change in Colorado:
A Synthesis to Support Water
Resources Management and
Adaptation
Report by the Western Water Assessment
for the Colorado Water Conservation Board
Lead Authors: Andrea J. Ray1, 2, Joseph J. Barsugli3,
Kristen B. Averyt2,3
Authors: Martin Hoerling1, Klaus Wolter2, 3
1NOAA/ESRL, 2CIRES/Western
Water Assessment,
3CIRES/Climate Diagnostics Center, 4Colorado State University
October 2008
Integrating climate information into water
resources planning and management
Synthesis of the Science to support:
– Governor Ritter’s Climate Change Action Plan & State water planning
– Governor’s Conference on Managing Risks of Drought and Climate, Oct 810, 2008
– Aimed at water-related planners, decisionmakers, and policymakers in
Colorado
• Based on WWA extensive interactions with water managers
• Water managers contributed to framing and review of the document
• Jargon minimized; glossary; Fahrenheit units; published figures/data re-plotted for
simplicity and to focus on CO
– Report leads forward into uses of climate in drought mitigation and
adaptation planning
• Connects science to vulnerability analysis and Integrated Resource Planning
(IRP)
• potential uses of the information in this report in assessment of climate risks and
vulnerabilities and in integrated resource planning and adaptation.
• Examples of how climate change information has been considered in waterrelated resource planning
Key findings
– Climate in CO is highly variable compared to other states
– The mountains and elevation make Colorado’s climate unique
compared with other Western states
– Temperatures have been increasing in CO
– Educate about models and their strengths and weaknesses
– Temperature projections are consistent: will continue to rise
– Uncertainty in precipitation projections
– Even in the absence of precipitation changes, temperature
increases alone combined related changes in evaporation and
soil moisture, all recent hydrologic projections show a decline in
runoff for most of Colorado's river basins by the mid-21st century
– A synthesis of findings in this report suggests a reduction in total
water availability by the mid-21st century
http://cwcb.state.co.us
What is needed to facilitate droughtrelated decisionmaking?
• Scientists need to collaborate with these sophisticated, but
non-climate experts in a common language
• Variables and indices
• flexible formats, areas, time scales
• tools to relate observations, historical data, and forecasts to water
managers perspectives, e.g. to their problems
• Ways to evaluate climate scenarios in their management scenarios
• Tools for managers to talk to their stakeholders
• Partnerships
• Interactions maintained over time
• Influence of scientists on the drought planning process and of water
managers on science done
• Innovation in both science and management from interaction
• Fora for communication, learning, bringing perspectives together
Beyond forecasts --> “Services”
for drought decision support
• Drought framing as part of climate and climate change
– Focussing event for mitigation planning and adaptation (new “normal”?)
– Opportunity to incorporate climate into other policies – e.g. EIS
• Drought risk management
– More than just the right products, and occurs in a dialogue about risks
– What are the spaces for interaction for these scientist-stakeholder
dialogues? Drought task forces, water user associations, agency
meetings
– Understanding the nature of risk and information/knowledge needed to
manage risk
– Managing drought in the context of changing climate -- adaptation
strategies and acknowledging long-term vulnerability
• Dialogue about climate-related risks with policy and planning for 2050 year horizons
– Not forecasting for these horizons, but inform long-lived policies likely to
encounter multi-year droughts and impacts of observed trends
Beyond forecasts --> “Services”
for drought decision support
• What’s the role of social science within the creation of droughtrelated climate services??
• What is the physical science/social science partnership??
• Not just that SS markets/helps market findings or that the focus is
too science-driven
• Not just what products are needed but what are the spaces in which
knowledge is created and scientist-stakeholder interactions link
research to services
• “What skill can your applications use?” -- add richness to this
discussion
• Identify and help develop needed synthesis of research into products
& analysis that connect climate impacts to water management
impacts (e.g. Timing of spring runoff --> water rights, reservoir reliability)
[email protected]
NOAA Earth Systems Research Lab
“Climate Analysis Branch”
Thank you!
Extra slides
Case: Diagnosis and Impacts of Warm Season Storms, Floods and
Sediment Inputs into the Middle Colorado River: Applications to
Decision Making and Adaptive Management
• Glen Canyon Dam Adaptive Management Program (GCDAMP): to balance
numerous, often competing, objectives, such as, water supply, hydropower
generation, low flow maintenance, maximizing the tributary supplied
sediment, endangered species recovery, and flood control.
• Key concern identified by the GCDAMP: need sediment input into the
Grand Canyon; warm season floods produce these
• Use of monitored and predictive information on the warm season floods (at
point-to-regional scales) has been identified as lead-information that can
potentially facilitate improved planning and operations.
• Project mapped physical processes alongside planning & decision
processes for the releases from the Dam which are aimed at achieving
restoration and maintenance of sandbars and instream ecology.
Grand Canyon region, cont
• Management occurs in the context of a range of variability
– Extremes of one type (flooding, high flows)may ocur during a drought
– “test releases” of flood flows implemented during 2004 and 2006vduring
dry or drought conditions
• Monitored and predictive information on the warm season floods (at pointto-regional scales) is lead-information that can potentially facilitate
improved planning and operations.
• Can’t escape needing information on both sides of the extremes
• Similar issues in Aspinall EIS/Gunnison River endangered fish recovery
•
Shaleen Jain, Roger Pulwarty & Jon Eischeid;
Theodore S. Melis & David Topping
Case: Aurora project, Kenney et al
• Rapidly growing suburban Denver; junior surface water rights, groundwater
table decreasing
• Demand management worked following the 2002 drought, but we didn’t
know what efforts were successful
• Better supply forecasts of limited use
• Demand management provides one of the best opportunities to adapt to
climate change and climate variability
• Utility-controlled variables are one factor in conservation: Price elasticity of
demand, rebates, water restrictions; use “smartreaders” and block rates
• Understanding of behavior suggests potential for use of summer weather
and climate forecasts, both in utility planning and for individual users
– Week 2 forecasts; seasonal demand calculations; suite of drought outlooks?
Wk 2/1 month/3 month
Other cases
• Other examples: see gunnison/aspinall
• Front range….raised interest in climate info in general
Report Goals
Communicate some major concepts
– Climate in CO is highly variable compared to other states
– The mountains and elevation make Colorado’s climate unique
compared with other Western states
– Temperatures have been increasing in CO
– Educate about models and their strengths and weaknesses
– Temperature projections are consistent: will continue to rise
– Uncertainty in precipitation projections
– Even in the absence of precipitation changes, temperature
increases alone combined related changes in evaporation and
soil moisture, all recent hydrologic projections show a decline in
runoff for most of Colorado's river basins by the mid-21st century
– A synthesis of findings in this report suggests a reduction in total
water availability by the mid-21st century
New slide….Colorado Climate report…climate change
•
Runoff ….
– Seasonal inflow into Aspinall was the lowest on record
•
Managers Drought US