Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Novel Modes of Immune Activation in Anopheles gambiae and Drosophila melanogaster Bo Lindberg Novel Modes of Immune Activation in Anopheles gambiae and Drosophila melanogaster Bo Lindberg Department of Molecular Biosciences, The Wenner-Gren Institute Stockholm University, Sweden 2014 © Bo Lindberg, Stockholm 2014 ISBN 978-91-7447-859-4 (includes pages 1-81) Printed in Sweden by Universitetsservice US-AB, Stockholm 2014 Distributor: Department of Molecular Biosciences, The Wenner-Gren Institute SAMMANFATTNING Malaria är en parasitsjukdom som orsakas av släktet Plasmodium och drabbar varje år runt en halv miljard människor varav nära en miljon avlider. Nästan samtliga dödsfall rör barn under fem år. Sjukdomen är numera i princip utrotad i västvärlden men är mycket vanligt förekommande i subtropikerna, särskilt i Afrika där också den dödligaste parasitarten Plasmodium falciparum är utbredd. Malaria sprids till människor genom saliven hos myggor av släktet Anopheles. Myggan smittas i sin tur av människor som har parasiter i blodet. För att kunna överföras till en människa måste malariaparasiten ta sig igenom en serie utvecklingsstadier i myggan och vandra från tarmen till salivkörtlarna, en process som tar tre veckor. Under denna period attackeras parasiten av myggans immunförsvar och lider ofta stora förluster. Det är dock inte utrett om, och i så fall exakt hur myggans immunförsvar känner igen parasiten eller om det i själva verket är myggans tarmbakterier som alarmerar om att något är fel. Till skillnad från däggdjur saknar insekter ett så kallat adaptivt immunförsvar och kan därför inte tillverka antikroppar. De förlitar sig istället på ett medfött immunsvar där vissa återkommande strukturella drag hos sjukdomsalstrande organismer känns igen av specialiserade receptorer hos immuncellerna. En av huvudmålen med det här arbetet var att utforska nya tillvägagångssätt för insekter att känna igen inkräktare. I den första artikeln visar vi att immunförsvaret hos myggan Anopheles gambiae reagerar på ett ämne som förkortas HMBPP. Denna lilla molekyl tillverkas av både malariaparasiten och många bakterier, men inte av flercelliga djur, och används bland annat i tillverkningen av hormoner och vitaminer. Vi visar bland annat att HMBPP utsöndras av malariaparasiten och att immunförsvaret aktiveras hos myggor när ämnet tillsätts i deras blodmål vilket också påverkade antalet tarmbakterier. I artikel II användes bakterien Escherichia coli och bananflugan Drosophila melanogaster som modellorganismer för att visa att radioaktivt bestrålade bakterier fortsätter att producera och utsöndra ämnen som kan aktivera immunsvar hos insekter. I den tredje artikeln kartlades hela arvsmassan hos bakterien Elizabethkingia anophelis, en vanligt förekommande bakterie i myggtarmen. Informationen i artikel III användes sedan i artikel IV för att beskriva bakteriens karaktärsdrag, bland annat hur den besitter gener för att hjälpa myggan att bryta ned komplexa kolhydrater i nektar samt den genetiska bakgrunden till bakteriens antibiotikaresistens. ABSTRACT Malaria is a disease of poverty and continues to plague a great part of the world’s population. An increased understanding of the interactions between the vector mosquito, the malaria parasite, and also the mosquito gut microbiota are pivotal for the development of novel measures against the disease. The first aim of this thesis was to gain a deeper knowledge of the microbial compounds that elicit immune responses in the main malaria vector Anopheles gambiae and also using the model organism Drosophila melanogaster. The second aim was to analyze the genome characteristics in silico of a bacterial symbiont from the mosquito midgut. In Paper I, we investigated the immunogenic effects of (E)-4-hydroxy-3methyl-but-2-enyl pyrophosphate in Anopheles. This compound is the primary activator of human Vγ9Vδ2 T cells and is only produced by organisms that use the non-mevalonate pathway for isoprenoid synthesis, such as Plasmodium and most eubacteria but not animals. We show that the parasite releases compounds of this nature and that provision of HMBPP in the bloodmeal induces an immune response in the mosquito. In Paper II, we investigated whether bacteria inactivated by gammairradiation could still stimulate potent immune responses in Drosophila cells. We show that E. coli retains the capacity to synthesize and release peptidoglycan de novo for several days after the irradiation event. When cells were stimulated with supernatants from irradiated bacteria, however, a unique response was observed. In Paper III, we presented the draft genome sequence of Elizabethkingia anophelis, a predominant gut symbiont of An. gambiae recently described in our lab and subsequently found in another laboratory strain of the mosquito. The genome data were then annotated in Paper IV to gain insights into the symbiotic characteristics of the bacterium, as well as the genetic background for its strong antibiotic resistance. In conclusion, this thesis work has shed light on novel modes for stimulating immune responses in insects and also led to the characterization of a predominant bacteria in the mosquito gut that may be used in future malaria intervention strategies. LIST OF PUBLICATIONS I. Lindberg, B.G.., Merritt, E., Olofsson, B., Faye, I. Immune eliciting and antioxidant properties of a microbe-associated isoprenoid precursor in Anopheles gambiae. PLOS ONE. 2013 Aug 13;8(8):e73868. II. Lindberg, B.G.. Oldenvi, S., Steiner, H. Medium from γ-irradiated Escherichia coli bacteria stimulates a unique immune response in Drosophila cells. Manuscript, submitted. III. Kukutla, P.*, Lindberg, B.G.*, Pei, D., Rayl, M., Yu, W., Steritz, M., Faye, I., Xu, J. Draft genome sequences of Elizabethkingia anophelis R26T and Ag1 from the midgut of the malaria mosquito Anopheles gambiae. Genome Announc. 2013 Dec 5;1(6):e01030-13. IV. Kukutla, P.*, Lindberg, B.G*, Pei, D., Rayl, M., Yu, W., Steritz, M., Faye, I., Xu, J. Insights from the genome annotation of Elizabethkingia anophelis from the midgut of the malaria mosquito Anopheles gambiae. Manuscript, revised and submitted. *Contributed equally ABBREVIATIONS AMP APC APL1 Cact/CACT DAMP DAP Dif DUOX ERK FOXO GNBP GPI HMBPP Hz IL Imd/IMD IPP Jak/JAK JNK LPS LRR MAMP MEP NF-κB NOS p70S6K PAMP PGN PGRP PI3K PKC PM PRR RNS ROS STAT antimicrobial peptide antigen presenting cell Anopheles Plasmodium-responsive LRR 1 protein cactus danger-associated molecular pattern diaminopimelic acid dorsal-related immune factor dual oxidase extracellular signal-regulated kinase forkhead box O Gram-negative binding protein glycosylphosphatidylinositol (E)-4-hydroxy-3-methyl-but-2-enyl pyrophosphate hemozoin interleukin immune deficiency isopentenyl pyrophosphate janus tyrosine kinase c-Jun N-terminal kinase lipopolysaccharide leucin-rich repeat microbe-associated molecular pattern 2-C-methyl-D-erythritol 4-phosphate nuclear factor kappa-light-chain-enhancer of activated B cells nitric oxide synthase p70S6 kinase pathogen-associated molecular pattern peptidoglycan peptidoglycan recognition receptor phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase protein kinase C peritrophic matrix pattern recognition receptor reactive nitrogen species reactive oxygen species signal transducer and activator of transcription TCR TCT Tep/TEP TGF TLR TNF T cell receptor tracheal cytotoxin thioester-containing protein transforming growth factor Toll-like receptor tumor necrosis factor TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION ................................................................................... 13 Insect immunity .................................................................................. 14 Molecular pattern recognition ............................................................ 15 Pattern molecules ............................................................................ 16 Pattern recognition receptors........................................................... 17 Immune signaling pathways ............................................................... 20 The Toll pathway ............................................................................. 20 The Imd pathway ............................................................................. 23 Other immune-related pathways ...................................................... 25 Malaria ................................................................................................ 26 Parasite development in the mosquito.............................................. 27 Antiplasmodial responses in Anopheles gambiae ............................ 28 Anatomical barriers ......................................................................... 29 Recognition and signal transduction ............................................... 30 Imd and Toll signaling .................................................................. 31 Additional immune signaling pathways ......................................... 32 Effector responses ........................................................................... 33 The TEP1 system........................................................................... 33 Antimicrobial peptides .................................................................. 35 ROS and nitric oxidase.................................................................. 36 Gut bacteria, the third player ........................................................... 37 Elizabethkingia anophelis ............................................................ 39 Plasmodium-derived elicitors........................................................... 40 Isoprenoid precursors ..................................................................... 41 Stimulation of Vγ9Vδ2 T cells ........................................................ 42 Isopentenyl pyrophosphate and HMBPP ....................................... 44 Recognition and signal transduction ............................................. 45 THE PRESENT STUDY ......................................................................... 47 Specific aims of the work .................................................................... 47 Results and discussion ........................................................................ 47 Paper I ............................................................................................. 47 Paper II ........................................................................................... 48 Paper III and IV .............................................................................. 50 CONCLUDING REMARKS .................................................................. 51 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS .................................................................... 52 REFERENCES ........................................................................................ 53 INTRODUCTION All organisms possess an immune system to defend themselves against potential pathogens. The immune response must be rapid enough and also able to discriminate intruders from self to avoid excessive damage to host tissues. In vertebrates, the immune system is divided into two branches termed innate and adaptive immunity. The former is evolutionarily much more ancient and comprises the immediate, non-specific response to pathogens through recognition of certain conserved patterns. The latter is solely found in vertebrates and is signified by the production of specific antibodies against antigenic compounds of the pathogen. Another typical feature of the adaptive immunity is the creation of a memory that will trigger a faster response upon subsequent exposures to the same intruder. The first evidence of an inducible immune response in insects was demonstrated by Boman and coworkers (Boman et al., 1972). Insects lack an adaptive immune system in its classical sense and must rely on innate immune responses to combat pathogens. The innate immune system is remarkably well conserved from invertebrates to mammals and the lower complexity of insects without influence of adaptive responses render them excellent models for subsequent studies of the human counterpart (Ishii et al., 2008; Medzhitov, 2007). The first indication of a common evolutionary origin was based on findings that insects and mammals have similar regulatory elements and factors for immune genes (Engstrom et al., 1993; Sen and Baltimore, 1986; Sun and Faye, 1992). The similarity was subsequently confirmed through the discovery of the Toll receptor in the fruit fly Drosophila melanogaster and subsequently the orthologous Toll-like receptor (TLR) in humans, which warranted the Nobel prize in 2011 (Lemaitre et al., 1996; Medzhitov et al., 1997; Poltorak et al., 1998). Following the breakthrough in the late 90’s, the work on Drosophila faced a huge rise in popularity. The work was boosted by the early publication of the complete Drosophila genome (Adams et al., 2000).Today it remains the most well-described model organism for studying insect immunity. The field 13 has, however, rapidly expanded in the last 10 years or so to cover a wide range of insect species, mostly thanks to the greatly reduced costs and increased speeds of the next-generation sequencing technology. A lot of emphasis is put on anopheline and aedine mosquitoes that act as vectors for many severe diseases including malaria, dengue fever, west nile virus, and yellow fever among others. Current prevention measures risk becoming diminished by an increased drug resistance of the pathogens as well as a growing insecticide resistance of the vectors. Also, despite an enduring potential, effective and affordable vaccines are still lacking. In this thesis, the general features of the insect immune system are first presented, mainly based on findings in Drosophila. The second part revolves around malaria, with focus on the immune recognition and response of the vector mosquito Anopheles gambiae and the role of the gut microbiota in the outcome of the disease. Insect immunity The insect innate immune system can be divided into three main classes: anatomical barriers, humoral immunity and cellular immunity (reviewed in (Lemaitre and Hoffmann, 2007)). Anatomical barriers refer to the epithelial linings of the skin, gut, reproductive tract and trachea that are constantly exposed to large numbers of microbes. The epithelial cells constitute a physical barrier and secrete antimicrobial compounds locally as a first line of defence against intruders. Some epithelial compartments such as the gut and trachea have chitinous meshworks as an additional barricade. In the midgut, the peritrophic matrix (PM) lines the intestinal lumen and is comparable to mucous secretion in the vertebrate digestive tract (reviewed in (Lehane, 1997; Merzendorfer and Zimoch, 2003)). The matrix is composed of secreted chitin, proteins and proteoglycans and serves as a semi-permeable barrier against enteric pathogens (Kuraishi et al., 2011). Humoral responses encompass the secretion of antimicrobial compounds locally as well as into the hemocoel, the insect body cavity. The latter is referred to as the systemic immune response and is mainly regulated by the insect fat body, an organ comparable to the vertebrate liver and adipose tissues and the major production site of antimicrobials. Systemic responses are 14 classically thought to become triggered when intruders have managed to breach the anatomical barriers. The hemocoel is packed with blood cells (hemocytes), which exert the cellular immune response. The terminology for classifying hemocytes differs between insect orders and voices for a more uniform nomenclature have been raised (Castillo et al., 2006). In Drosophila, hemocytes are divided into three cell types: plasmatocytes, crystal cells and lamellocytes (Lanot et al., 2001). Most abundant are the plasmatocytes that mediate phagocytosis of bacteria, yeast and several particles. Crystal cells are responsible for depositing melanin through activation of the prophenoloxidase (PPO) cascade, which causes dark spots at sites of injury or on invading parasites. This event is referred to as melanization and is thought to promote pathogen killing during clot formation and wound healing (reviewed in (Eleftherianos and Revenis, 2011)). Lamellocytes are clearly the largest cell type and are almost exclusively present in parasitized larvae where they participate in the encapsulation of wasp eggs that are too large to be phagocytosed (reviewed in (Lemaitre and Hoffmann, 2007)). Molecular pattern recognition The concept of non-self pattern recognition was originally introduced by Charles Janeway Jr. in 1989. At the time, the adaptive immune system was at the forefront of immunological research. In order to achieve an adaptive immune response, however, immunologists had to mix antigens with socalled adjuvants that among other components also contained heat-killed bacteria. The reason why was not known, and Janeway referred to it as the “dirty little secret” of the community. According to his model, the adaptive immune system needed an initial signal delivered by the innate immune system. Furthermore, he suggested that the sensing of pathogens was in fact carried by innate, germline-encoded pattern recognition receptors (PRRs) that recognized conserved motifs, termed pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMPs) (Janeway, 1989). The model was later confirmed through the findings of the Toll (Lemaitre et al., 1996) and TLR receptors (Poltorak et al., 1998). Nowadays, microbe-associated molecular pattern (MAMP) is also a commonly used term due to the additional presence in non-pathogenic microbes. A compound is classified as a MAMP if it fulfills a set of criteria. First, it must act as ligand for recognition by host pattern recognition recep15 tors (PRRs). Second, the compound has to be strongly conserved and essential for microbial survival. Compared to the somatically rearranged receptors and antibodies of the adaptive immune system, PRRs are present in both vertebrates and invertebrates and are evolutionary conserved. Depending on the receptor type, an activated PRR either acts immediately by triggering phagocytosis or endolytic degradation of the target or triggers a downstream signaling event. In insects, the receptor-mediated signal activation leads to expression of antimicrobial effectors. The antimicrobial peptides (AMPs) (Steiner et al., 1981) are the classical example, although several other factors are also involved in the response. Pattern molecules Drosophila senses bacteria through recognition of the peptidoglycan (PGN), a central cell wall component and a designated MAMP (Fig. 1). Several other bacterial compounds act as MAMPs in humans, including lipopolysaccharides (LPS) (Poltorak et al., 1998), flagellin (Hayashi et al., 2001), lipoteichoic acid (LTA) (Schwandner et al., 1999) and CpG-DNA (Krieg et al., 1995), but have yet to display clear-cut immunogenic activity in Drosophila. Recognition of fungi and yeast is mediated by PRR recognition of the cellwall polysaccharide β-(1,3)-glucan, a designated MAMP for the silkmoth Bombyx mori (Ochiai and Ashida, 2000) and Drosophila (Ligoxygakis et al., 2002). In addition, certain virulence factors from yeast and bacteria are recognized by PRRs (see below). Bacterial PGN associates with insect PRRs termed peptidoglycan recognition proteins (PGRPs), a receptor family that is highly conserved in evolution (see below; reviewed in (Kurata, 2014)). The general PGN-structure is derived from a disaccharide backbone of Nacetylglucosamine and N-acetylmuramic acid attached to short stem peptides that are in turn cross-linked. The resulting mesh-like layer aids in maintaining the conformational integrity and offsets the osmotic pressure of the cytoplasm. In Gram-negative bacteria, the PGN stem peptides are directly crosslinked and contain meso-diaminopimelic acid (DAP-PGN) at the third amino acid position. Most Gram-positive bacteria have L-lysine (Lys-PGN) instead and additional cross-linking peptides between the stem peptides. Exceptions do exist; for example Bacillus species produce DAP-PGN. Gram-positive cells also possess a much thicker PGN-layer with greater structural variation than Gram-negatives (Schleifer and Kandler, 1972). The latter group have in 16 turn an additional, outer cell wall that coats the PGN. Hence, it has been debated whether hemocytes need to first phagocytose Gram-negative bacteria in order for PGRPs to reach the PGN. Karlsson et al. demonstrated, however, that during logarithmic growth Escherichia coli constantly shed and release monomomers of PGN to allow cellular restructuring (Karlsson et al., 2012). The soluble monomeric form named tracheal cytotoxin (TCT) is a potent MAMP for certain PGRPs (Kaneko et al., 2004). Cell-cell contact is therefore not necessary for activation of downstream immune responses in this context. Pattern recognition receptors The arsenal of PRRs for PGN recognition in mammals constitute of TLRs and NOD-like receptors. Insects on the other hand rely on PGRPs, which were first isolated by Ashida’s group and subsequently cloned by Kang et al. who also showed that this family of proteins is conserved from insects to humans (Kang et al., 1998; Yoshida et al., 1996). The relative contribution of PGRPs to the insect immune system is reflected in the number of family members expressed; Drosophila has 13 genes encoding 19 proteins (Werner et al., 2003; Werner et al., 2000), An. gambiae has seven genes and nine proteins (Christophides et al., 2002), whereas human and mouse have four genes each. In Drosophila, PGRPs are divided into long (PGRP-L) and short (PGRP-S) forms. Another feature that separates PGRPs is the ability to degrade PGN through amidase activity (Mellroth et al., 2003). Both PGN and TCT can diffuse into the hemolymph (Gendrin et al., 2009). Amidase active PGRPs are therefore scavenging PGN from the host microbiota to prevent chronic immune activation (Bischoff et al., 2006; Mellroth et al., 2003; Paredes et al., 2011; Zaidman-Remy et al., 2006). The known modulators include PGRP-LB, SC1a, SC1b and SC2, which all cleave DAP-PGN (reviewed in (Kurata, 2014)). In addition, PGRP-SC1/2 recognize and degrade Lys-PGN (Bischoff et al., 2006; Garver et al., 2006; Mellroth et al., 2003). A few catalytic PGRPs mediate immune responses. Degradation of PGN by PGRPSC1a enhances phagocytosis of the Gram-positive and Lys-PGN-containing Staphylococcus aureus (Garver et al., 2006). The amidase activity of PGRPSB1 is directly bacteriolytic (Mellroth and Steiner, 2006) although this effect seem redundant for defence against bacterial infections (Zaidman-Remy et al., 2011). 17 Among the other members of the long form, PGRP-LC and PGRP-LE recognize DAP-PGN (see below) (Kaneko et al., 2004; Leulier et al., 2003; Stenbak et al., 2004; Werner et al., 2003) and are receptors for the Imd pathway (Choe et al., 2002; Gottar et al., 2002; Ramet et al., 2002; Takehana et al., 2002) and the melanization cascade (Schmidt et al., 2008; Takehana et al., 2002). PGRP-LA and PGRP-LD both contain transmembrane regions (Werner et al., 2000) and the former has been proposed to promote AMP expression in the trachea (Gendrin et al., 2013). The sixth member of the long form, PGRP-LF, cannot bind PGN and instead acts as a negative regulator of Imd signaling through its interaction with the PGRP-LCx-isoform to prevent dimerization (Basbous et al., 2011; Persson et al., 2007). Besides PGRP-LCx, two other isoforms, PGRP-LCa and PGRP-LCy, exist that differ in their extracellular PGRP domains and hence in their PGN binding specificities. PGRP-LCx has a deep PGN-binding cleft, is able to bind both mono- and polymeric PGN and likely forms clusters (Kleino and Silverman, 2014). The cleft is however occluded in PGRP-LCa, which instead interacts with both TCT and PGRP-LCx and acts as an adaptor for the latter through heterodimerization (Chang et al., 2006; Chang et al., 2005; Kaneko et al., 2005; Mellroth et al., 2005). The expression of PGRP-LCy is much lower than for the other two isoforms and the receptor has been proposed to have a minor antagonistic function (Neyen et al., 2012). PGRP-LE lacks a transmembrane domain and is instead released both intra- and extracellularly where it exclusively recognizes DAP-PGN and either mediates Imd pathway activation, PPO-induced melanization (Takehana et al., 2002), or Imd-independent autophagy (Yano et al., 2008). It has also been shown that PGRP-LE/LC act synergistically and might form heterodimers (Takehana et al., 2004). The remaining short PGRPs, PGRP-SD and PGRP-SA, are secreted into the hemolymph and mediate the activation of the Toll and PPO pathways (Fig. 1, 2; see next section) (Bischoff et al., 2004; Michel et al., 2001). The Toll pathway is also activated by fungal β-(1,3)-glucans (Ligoxygakis et al., 2002; Ochiai and Ashida, 2000) as well as subtilisin-like virulence factors from yeast (Gottar et al., 2006) and bacteria (El Chamy et al., 2008), which are recognized by the PRRs GNBP3 and Psh, respectively. Bacterial virulence factors have also been linked to manipulations of Imd-pathway activity. The E. coli-derived cytotoxic necrotizing family 1 (CNF1) modifies the 18 RhoGTPase, Rac2, that in turn initiates immune responses by interacting with Imd and Rip-kinases (Boyer et al., 2011). Figure 1. Schematic overview of microbial recognition and subsequent activation of downstream responses in Drosophila. 19 While several receptors in insect humoral immunity have been identified, less is known regarding the mechanisms of recognition that precede cellular responses. The Drosophila phagocytic receptor Eater is exclusively expressed on the cell surface of plasmatocytes and binds directly to Grampositive, but not Gram-negative bacteria (Chung and Kocks, 2011). Membrane disrupting treatments of the bacteria by the insect AMP Cecropin A, however, results in binding of Eater to the latter Gram-type as well, indicating a collaborative response of humoral and cellular immunity. The putative MAMP for Eater is not known, although extracellular PGRP-SC1a has been proposed to act as an opsonin (Kurata, 2014). Another phagocytic receptor, Draper, has however been found to interact with LTA of S. aureus, indicating a true PAMP-PRR relationship (Hashimoto et al., 2009). The production of cell wall teichoic acids (WTAs) by the same bacterium, on the other hand, masks its PGN layer from recognition by PGRP-SA and SD, which indicates an evolutionary arms race of hide and seek (Atilano et al., 2011). Immune signaling pathways The production and secretion of antimicrobial peptides (AMPs) in response to microbial challenge is the classic hallmark of humoral immune response in insects. Expression is typically induced by the Toll pathway, the immunodeficiency (Imd) pathway or a combination of both. The different PRRs of the two pathways allow discrimination between PGN-types; Lys-PGN is thought to mainly activate the Toll-pathway, whereas DAP-PGN is preferentially recognized by Imd pathway receptors (Fig. 2). The Toll pathway The Toll pathway is required for dorsoventral patterning during embryonic development as well as in the immune defence against Gram-positive bacteria and fungi in Drosophila. The Drosophila genome encodes nine Toll genes including the Toll pathway receptor Toll. In contrast to human TLRs, Toll is in insects a cytokine receptor rather than PRR. Pattern recognition is instead mediated by the above mentioned extracellular receptors, PGRP-SA, PGRP-SD, the Gram-negative binding proteins GNBP1 and GNBP3, and Persephone (Psh). In addition to maturation of the Toll ligand Spätzle (Spz) to its active form, the Toll pathway is also dependent on endocytosis for activation (Huang et al., 2010). 20 Figure 2. The Toll (left panel) and Imd (right panel) signaling pathways in Drosophila. Abbrevations not mentioned in the main text include ESCRT-0, endosomal sorting complexes required for transport; TAB2, TAK1-binding protein; dnr1, defense repressor 1; U, ubiquitination; P, phosporylation. Upon recognition of Lys-PGN, PGRP-SA forms a complex with GNBP1 (a misnomer) that in turn hydrolyzes the PGN to present new glycan reducing ends to PGRP-SA (Gobert et al., 2003; Michel et al., 2001; Wang et al., 2006). Although PGRP-SA can bind monomeric Lys-PGN, at least a dimeric 21 muropeptide is required for Toll pathway activation (Filipe et al., 2005). A plausible explanation is that PGRP-SA requires clustering through the binding of several receptors to the same Lys-PGN-fragment for activation of downstream pathway in insects (Park et al., 2007). PGRP-SD also participates in the sensing of Gram-positive bacteria, although it has been proposed to confer a partially redundant role to the PGRP-SA-GNBP1 complex (Bischoff et al., 2004). Later, it was found that PGRP-SD participates in increasing the interaction of GNBP1 to both PGRP-SA and Lys-PGN (Wang et al., 2008). In addition, the crystal structure of PGRP-SD suggests that it preferentially binds to DAP-PGN and thus represents a route for activation of the Toll pathway by Gram-negative bacteria (Leone et al., 2008). The activation of PRRs recruits a modular serine protease and induces a proteolytic cascade that leads to cleavage and activation of Spz by the protease Spz processing enzyme (SPE) (Jang et al., 2006). An alternative route is present where activated Psh becomes proteolytically matured to directly activate SPE (El Chamy et al., 2008; Gottar et al., 2006). The processed and mature Spz binds to the Toll receptor that in turn dimerizes. The intracellular domains of Toll will then recruit the adaptor protein MyD88, Tube, and the kinase Pelle which will form a trimeric complex (Sun et al., 2002). Upon formation, the complex activates Dorsal or Dorsal related immune factor (Dif). Both factors belong to the family of the nuclear factor kappa-lightchain-enhancer of activated B cells (NF-κB). The exact mechanism for Dif/Dorsal activation is not resolved but includes phosphorylation and subsequent degradation of Cactus (Cact), an ortholog to inhibitor of kappa B (IκB) in humans (Wu and Anderson, 1998), likely mediated by Pelle (Huang et al., 2010; Towb et al., 2001). The active forms of Dif/Dorsal are then able enter the nucleus and initiate transcription of AMP genes. Dorsal was originally linked to dorsoventral patterning but is expressed in the fat body of larvae and adults where it is induced (Reichhart et al., 1993) and participates in the response to microbial challenge (Lau et al., 2003). In contrast, Dif is only involved in mediating transcription of immune effectors (Ip et al., 1993). In larvae, there seem to be a redundancy between the two factors (Manfruelli et al., 1999; Rutschmann et al., 2000), whereas only Dif induces the antifungal AMP Drosomycin (Drs) in adults (Lemaitre et al., 1996; Rutschmann et al., 2000). In the commonly used macrophage-like S2 cell line, however, Dorsal has been suggested as the most important transcription factor for Drs expression (Valanne et al., 2010). 22 The Imd pathway The first indication of a second immune pathway in Drosophila was based on the repeated failure to link Dif to the expression of the AMP gene Diptericin (Dpt) (Ip and Levine, 1994; Lemaitre et al., 1995b). Around the same time, the Immune deficiency (Imd) gene was discovered in which a mutation strongly reduced the expression of antimicrobial peptides (Corbo and Levine, 1996; Lemaitre et al., 1995a). The different components of the Imd pathway were subsequently step-wise discovered, initially through the employment of forward genetic screening of mutant strains with impaired induction of Dpt, and later using RNA interference (RNAi) and yeast twohybrid screens (reviewed in (Imler, 2014)). Although not known at the time, the NF-κB of the Imd pathway, Relish, had already been discovered (Dushay et al., 1996) and was later shown to be crucial for AMP induction and bacterial resistance (Hedengren et al., 1999). Analogous to human NF-κBs, p100 and p105, Relish both contain a Rel domain and inhibitory ankyrin repeats and thus differ from Dif/Dorsal, which are dependent on Cact for inhibiton. The Imd pathway has been likened to human tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNFα) signaling (Kaneko and Silverman, 2005; Lemaitre and Hoffmann, 2007). In contrast to the Toll pathway, the Imd pathway is only known to participate in immunity and seems to be the only immune cascade involved in local induction of AMP expression (Ferrandon et al., 1998; Tzou et al., 2000). Another striking difference is the much faster onset of the Imd pathway with nuclear translocation of Relish occurring within minutes (Paquette et al., 2010) and peak expression of AMPs within a few hours after bacterial challenge (Lemaitre et al., 1997). The Toll-mediated response in comparison can take up to hours for activation and the expression of AMPs can instead be sustained for days (Lemaitre et al., 1997). It has hence been speculated that the Imd pathway is involved in acute responses and to more quickly growing pathogens than the Toll pathway (Lemaitre and Hoffmann, 2007). Pathway activation is achieved through sensing of Gram-negative and Grampositive bacilli (Lemaitre et al., 1997; Stenbak et al., 2004) through recognition of DAP-PGN by the membrane bound PGRP-LCx and PGRP-LCa as well as intra- or extracellularly through PGRP-LE. Receptor activation probably causes dimerization or multimerization (Mellroth et al., 2005) and leads to recruitment of Imd (Choe et al., 2005). Imd in turn acts as an adaptor protein and recruits dFADD (Leulier et al., 2002) and the apical caspase Dredd (Leulier et al., 2000). Upon complex formation, Dredd is proteolytically 23 activated through ubiquitination (Meinander et al., 2012) and cleaves Imd, which in turn also gets ubiquitinated (Paquette et al., 2010). These events are thought to mediate recruitment of the mitogen activated protein kinase (MAPK) TAK1, which in turn phosphorylates and activates the IκB kinase (IKK) as well as the c-Jun N-terminal kinase (JNK) branch of the pathway (reviewed in (Kleino and Silverman, 2014)). The exact mechanism behind Relish activation is not entirely resolved, but involves phosphorylation by IKK (Silverman et al., 2000) and proteolytic removal of the ankyrin repeats, probably by Dredd (Meinander et al., 2012; Stoven et al., 2000; Stoven et al., 2003). The N-terminal fragment of Relish subsequently translocates into the nucleus to promote transcription of AMP genes, typically Dpt, Attacin (Att) and Cecropin (Cec) (Lemaitre et al., 1997; Stoven et al., 2000) through binding to specific upstream κB-sequences (Busse et al., 2007; Sun et al., 1991a; Sun et al., 1991b). However, the control regions of many cecropin as well as attacin genes often contain various different promoter sites. It is therefore not surprising that the expression of these genes has often been reported as somewhat promiscuous (HedengrenOlcott et al., 2004)). Later, it was shown that AttA, among other immune genes, is regulated equally by both pathways through upstream κB-regions for both Dif and Relish (Busse et al., 2007). Moreover, Dif and Relish are able to form heterodimers to induce transcription of genes that were originally thought to be more strictly regulated by either pathway (Tanji et al., 2010). The Imd pathway needs constant regulation to avoid chronic immune activation. Extracellular regulation is mediated by the above mentioned scavenging PGRPs and inhibitory PGRP-LF. Interestingly, the amidase-active PGRPs seem to only regulate the Imd pathway, despite the obvious recognition of Lys-PGN by some of them (Bischoff et al., 2006). A plausible explanation is that the Imd, but not the Toll pathway, is involved in local responses and thus needs additional modes of fine-tuned regulation to maintain tolerance to the normal flora. In light of this, it is surprising that a member of the Toll receptor family, Toll-8/Tollo, has been found to constitute a receptor for a signal cascade that antagonizes Imd-pathway activation in the trachea of Drosophila (Akhouayri et al., 2011). Additional regulation of the pathway occurs at various intracellular levels. Constitutive activation is inhibited by Caspar, which prevents processing of Relish by Dredd (Kim et al., 2006). Upon pathway activation, the regulator Pirk is induced before AMPs and 24 participates in a negative feedback loop, likely by interfering with the ImdPGRP-LC complex (Aggarwal et al., 2008; Kleino et al., 2008). In the gut of Drosophila, PGRP-LE has been proposed to mediate negative feedback inhibition of the pathway through the constitutive induction of Pirk and PGRPLB (Bosco-Drayon et al., 2012). Additional inhibitors of Dredd as well as several proteins involved in ubiquitin-mediated proteasome degradation have been linked to the regulation of the pathway (reviewed in (Kleino and Silverman, 2014)). Other immune-related pathways A few other signaling pathways have been implicated in insect immune responses. The underlying microbial triggers and effector responses are, however, not always entirely understood. The janus tyrosine kinase/signal transducers and activators of transcription (Jak/STAT) pathway has been proposed as functionally analogous to the interferon system in mammals (Kingsolver et al., 2013). The signaling pathway is involved in various cellular processes and mediates both cellular and humoral responses to viruses, parasites and some bacteria. The three major proteins of the pathway are the receptor Domeless, Jak, and the transcription factor Stat92E. Nuclear translocation of the latter has been linked to viral and bacterial infections in mosquitoes (Barillas-Mury et al., 1999; Souza-Neto et al., 2009) and Drosophila (Dostert et al., 2005). In Drosophila, the Jak/STAT pathway regulates several immune genes such as the antibacterial peptide gene Listericin (in corporation with PGRP-LE) (Goto et al., 2010) as well as Turandot and the complement like factor Thioester-containing protein 2 (Tep2), of which the exact immune functions remain to be established (Agaisse et al., 2003; Boutros et al., 2002; Lagueux et al., 2000). The pathway also plays a central role during wasp parasitization as it regulates the differentiation of prohemocytes into lamellocytes (Makki et al., 2010). The Akt/PI3K pathway is involved in various cellular processes including metabolism, proliferation, longevity and immunity. The pathway is in insects triggered by insulin like peptides (ILPs), human insulin and likely other growth factors, and contains at least two key transcription factors, p70S6 kinase (p70S6K) and forkhead box O (FOXO). In absence of stimuli, the transcription factor FOXO remains active in the nucleus to transcribe target genes. FOXO maintains low level expression of AMPs during starvation (Becker et al., 2010) and also regulates autophagy and muscle aging (Bai et al., 2013; Demontis and Perrimon, 2010). Upon pathway activation, Akt 25 phosphorylates FOXO, which in turns translocates to the cytoplasm were it is degraded. Instead, p70S6K becomes active to promote protein translation. The three major MAPK pathways, extracellular-signal-regulated kinase (Erk), p38 and JNK are involved in various cellular processes. They have also been associated with immune responses and are in this sense reviewed in the malaria section. Malaria Malaria is an ancient disease that continues to plague a great part of the world population. The word malaria stems from the expression for “bad air” in medieval Italian and refers to the miasma theory coined by Hippocrates that certain diseases were spread through contaminated air rather than by human contact. At the end of the 19th century, the mystery behind the disease was gradually unravelled. The first breakthrough was the sighting of the disease-causing parasite in 1880 by Alphonse Laveran, who also hypothesized that the disease was spread by mosquitoes. At the same time, the protozoan genus Plasmodium was described by Angelo Celli and Ettore Marchiafava and was later found to be the causative agent for all malaria. Subsequently, Sir Ronald Ross demonstrated the role of mosquitoes as vectors for the parasite and also deciphered the mosquito life cycle of avian malaria in 1897 for which he received the Nobel Prize in 1902. Around the same time, the Italian physician and zoologist, Giovanni Battista Grassi, described the human malaria parasite, P. falciparum, and demonstrated that transmission to humans is mediated by mosquitoes of the genus Anopheles (reviewed in (Desowitz, 1999). According to the World Health Organization (WHO), the number of malaria episodes world-wide were in 2012 estimated to be 207 million, resulting in approximately 627 000 deaths (WHO malaria report, 2013). About 80 % of the cases occurred in sub-Saharan Africa, where also 90 % of death cases were reported. Malaria is especially dangerous for children under the age of five as 77 % of the global deaths occurred in this age group. These numbers, while still huge, represent a decline in the last 10-year period and in part correlates with increased efforts to control malaria. Insecticide-treated mosquito bed nets and indoor residual spraying with insecticides have together with new artemisinin-based combination therapies proven successful. It is, 26 however, difficult to interpret to what extent these measures correlate with the roll-back of malaria as environmental factors have to be taken into account. Growing resistance to current insectides and antimalarial drugs has also been reported in several countries and is a rapidly growing concern. In addition, WHO have faced critique for grossly underestimating the mortality numbers (Murray et al., 2012). Alternative methods aimed at controlling, eliminating and ultimately eradicating malaria are thus urgently needed. The malaria situation has generated an increasing interest in transmission blocking and vector control strategies. During the last 15 years or so, great efforts have been put into deciphering the genetic and biochemical backgrounds of the complex interactions between the mosquito and the malaria parasite. Novel genetic tools have also led to the development of transgenic strategies for either controlling the vector population or inhibiting disease transmission (reviewed in (David et al., 2013)). The former typically aims at blocking the reproductive capacity, for example by mass release of sterile males or females. On the downside with this approach, the possible sideeffects on the ecosystem are hard to foresee and could also likely result in rapid species reestablishment or replacement. In the latter approach, the ecological impact might be less pronounced since the mosquito population would be stably maintained. Mosquitoes are instead genetically engineered to either express antiparasitic factors or boost the endogenous immune response. Paratransgenesis is another interesting, albeit controversial, strategy that has received growing attention lately. The aim is to block disease transmission by the introduction of a symbiotic microbe that has been transformed to specifically express antiparasitic factors. The aforementioned strategies aim at ultimately introducing genetically modified organism in nature, which is not without risks. The introduced trait can potentially confer an unwanted selective advantage to the modified organism and inserted genes can be horizontally transferred to other species. It is hence important to aim at thoroughly addressing such issues in the laboratory or semi-field facilities before proceeding further. It is also likely that a combination of several approaches will have to be applied simultaneously to control and ultimately eradicate vector-borne diseases. Parasite development in the mosquito The malarial life cycle within the mosquito is highly complex and involves several developmental and replicative stages, which last for about 3 weeks (reviewed in (Aly et al., 2009)). Upon ingestion of blood from a contagious 27 host by the female mosquito, gametocyte stages of Plasmodium will end up in the midgut, transform into gametes and subsequently mate (Fig. 3). This is the only transitional stage where the parasite undergoes sexual reproduction. Mosquitoes are therefore in biological terms regarded as the “primary” Plasmodium host whereas humans and other mammalian hosts are seen as “secondary” (reviewed in (Marois, 2011)). The resulting zygote differentiates into a highly motile ookinete that invades and traverses the gut epithelium, resulting in substantial structural and osmotic epithelial damage. Upon reaching the basal surface of the epithelium, the ookinete ceases movement and transforms into a spherical oocyst (“egg sac” in Greek). Immediately after formation, the oocyst will commence multiple rounds of mitotic divisions. This process is known as sporogony and results in massive amplification of asexual, highly motile parasites referred to as sporozoites. Consequently, the enormous increase in ookinete size will cause membrane rupture and release of sporozoites into the mosquito hemocoel. From here, sporozoites will migrate to and invade the salivary glands in order to get injected along with the saliva into a new host. Antiplasmodial immunity in Anopheles gambiae Malaria infection often causes severe illness in humans. Several of the clinical symptoms are due to hyperactivation of host immune responses by the parasite. Mosquitoes on the other hand are much more tolerant to the infection. A plausible explanation is that the much shorter generation time of mosquitoes have adapted them to better cope with the parasite throughout the evolution. Nevertheless, Plasmodium infection induces a strong immune response and affects mosquito survival, reproduction and fitness (Ahmed and Hurd, 2006; Ahmed et al., 2001; Anderson et al., 2000; Hogg and Hurd, 1997). In the Anopheles genus, only around 40 out of more than 400 mosquito species permit the development of Plasmodium parasites (Service, 1993). Even within laboratory-reared strains selected for susceptibility, the individual vector capacity often varies dramatically. To understand why and how mosquitoes differ in their susceptibility, a review of the Anopheles immune responses against the parasite is presented. 28 Figure 3. Schematic review of the developmental stages of Plasmodium within the mosquito (left panel) and the antiplasmodial responses mounted by the mosquito (right panel). DTN, dityrosine network; PM, peritrophic membrane; BL, basal lamina. Anatomical barriers The mosquito gut harbours natural bacteria that proliferate up to 1000-fold after a blood meal, presumably due to the increase in nutrients (Pumpuni et al., 1996). Inducing immune responses to control such a vast amount would divert a lot of resources from egg development. It is therefore of vital importance to restrict the contact with the microbiota. A common response to blood ingestion in hematophagous insects is to secrete a PM from the midgut epithelium (Fig. 3). In Anopheles, the PM reaches maximum thickness approximately 24 h after blood ingestion, roughly overlapping with the gut 29 bacterial growth peak. The time point also coincides with the ookinete midgut invasion, which can be explained by parasite expression and secretion of chitinases that locally dissolve the PM (Langer and Vinetz, 2001; Moreira et al., 2004). Vaccines designed to target ookinete-secreted proteins could thus be used in transmission-blocking strategies and still represent an interesting, albeit challenging approach (reviewed in (Lavazec and Bourgouin, 2008)). An additional barrier composed of dityrosine crosslinks is formed by oxidase-peroxidase enzymes including dual oxidase (DUOX) upon blood feeding (Kumar et al., 2010). The resulting network prevents microbial elicitors from reaching the gut epithelium and thus aids the mosquito from chronic immune activation. On the other hand, the barrier also shields developing parasites and could therefore be regarded as a double-edged sword for the mosquito. Invaded midgut cells are either lysed directly or undergo programmed cell death and are extruded from the epithelium. It is doubtful whether cell extrusion is an active antiplasmodial response rather than a general tissue repair mechanism. For invading ookinetes, however, it is of crucial importance to escape into the basal lamina before this event (reviewed in (Baton and Ranford-Cartwright, 2005)). Recognition and signal transduction The immune signaling pathways are strongly conserved between An. gambiae and D. melanogaster. At recognition and effector phases, however, genes are clearly more divergent and species-specific suggesting that each species has adapted fine-tuned immune responses against their natural pathogens (Waterhouse et al., 2007). The Toll, IMD and JAK-STAT pathways have all been identified in An. gambiae through orthology to Drosophila (Christophides et al., 2002; Waterhouse et al., 2007). Interestingly, there seems to exist a pathway discrepancy in the response to different Plasmodium-species; the IMD response is crucial for responses to P. falciparum whereas the Toll pathway plays a key role in responses to P. berghei (Dong et al., 2006; Garver et al., 2009; Mitri et al., 2009). The latter is a rodent malaria species and does not infect An. gambiae in nature due to the mosquito’s preference for human blood. Nevertheless, P. berghei has regularly been employed as a model species as it normally gives rise to much higher oocyst numbers than P. falciparum. A potential problem with employing nonnatural vector-parasite combinations in basic research is that immune re30 sponses rarely involved in natural infections are over-emphasized. Indeed, infection with either Plasmodium species induces quite different transcriptome responses in the mosquito (Dong et al., 2006). IMD and Toll signaling Similar to Drosophila, the An. gambiae IMD and Toll pathways are thought to be activated through PGRP recognition of PGN. Interestingly, AgPGRPLC (PGRPLC according to the HUGO nomenclature, which is slightly modified from that of Drosophila (Christophides et al., 2002)) can potentially bind both DAP- and Lys-PGN (Meister et al., 2009). Challenge with bacteria of either Gram types also activates the IMD pathway, which is required for mosquito survival (Meister et al., 2009; Meister et al., 2005). These findings suggest that IMD signaling is a general response to bacteria in An. gambiae. The pathway also has a profound role in mounting the antiplasmodial response and mainly affects the ookinete stage (Garver et al., 2012). The expression of several antiplasmodial effectors including leucin-rich repeat domain protein 7 (LRRD7), fibronectin 9 (FBN9), members of the TEP1 system and AMPs is regulated by the pathway (see next section) (Blandin et al., 2004; Dong et al., 2006; Garver et al., 2012; Garver et al., 2009; Meister et al., 2005; Mitri et al., 2009; Povelones et al., 2009). Similar to Drosophila, the signal cascade results in the activation of the Relish ortholog, REL2F, through cleavage of its inhibitory ankyrin repeats. In addition, an alternative splice form denoted REL2S exists, which is not found in Drosophila, lacks the inhibitory ankyrin repeats and is constitutively active, probably to maintain basal immune expression (Meister et al., 2005). In the same study, knock down experiments indicated that REL2F mediates the response to P. berghei. The same splice form was later also linked to protection against P. falciparum (but not to P. berghei in this study) as knock down of Caspar, which only inhibits the ankyrin-containing REL2F, completely aborted parasite development (Garver et al., 2009). In contrast to these findings, however, another study linked the protection against P. falciparum to REL2S and not RELF (Mitri et al., 2009). REL2 also has a vital role in the antiplasmodial response in An. stephensi as mosquitoes genetically engineered to overexpress the transcription factor in either midgut or fat body tissues in response to blood ingestion were more resistant to P. falciparum (Dong et al., 2011). 31 Much less is known about the Toll signaling events in An. gambiae. REL1 is analogous to Dorsal, but the mosquito surprisingly has no Dif counterpart. Also, the underlying mechanism for Toll pathway activation in An. gambiae is not known. AgPGRPS is orthologous to DmPGRP-SA but the mosquito lacks orthologs for enzymes involved in the proteolytic degradation of AgSPZ (Waterhouse et al., 2007). Toll signaling has nevertheless been associated with responses to Gram-positive bacteria, fungi and Plasmodium. Depletion of the REL1 inhibitor, CACT, blocks P. berghei infection and reduces P. falciparum oocyst numbers (Garver et al., 2009). The Toll-mediated defence against P. berghei seems dependent on the TEP1 system. Knock down of the central component Anopheles Plasmodium-responsive LRR 1C protein (APL1C; see below) abolishes the protection (Riehle et al., 2008). Also, knockdown of CACT increases basal TEP1-levels and blocks parasite infection (Frolet et al., 2006). Additional immune signaling pathways The An. gambiae JAK/STAT-pathway has a unique antiplasmodial function as it affects developing oocysts (Gupta et al., 2009). The ancestral STAT gene (STATA) regulates expression of nitric oxide synthase (NOS) which is necessary for the antiplasmodial response (see below). A protective role of the pathway has also been shown against P. vivax in An. aquasalis (Bahia et al., 2011). Interestingly, Gupta et al. showed that STATA levels are regulated by a second, intronless STAT (STATB) that probably originated from gene duplication. The phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K)/Akt and MAPK pathways are beside their involvement in several physiological processes also regulating responses to Plasmodium infection. Increased PI3K/Akt signaling in the midgut can almost completely block parasite transmission in An. stephensi (Corby-Harris et al., 2010). The three classical MAPKs, ERK, p38 and JNK are often associated with responses to various stress stimuli. All three MAPKs together with NF-κB are activated via Toll-like receptors and mediate inflammatory responses in human macrophages stimulated with Plasmodium-derived signals (see below) (Lu et al., 2006; Zhu et al., 2005). In the mosquito, ERK has been implicated in NOS regulation and influences parasite development in the midgut in response to the human growth hormone transforming growth factor β1 (TGF- β1) (Luckhart et al., 2003; Surachetpong et al., 2009). The JNK pathway represents a second branch of the Imd pathway in Drosophila and could hence be regarded as a part of the 32 immune response. The first indication of an antiplasmodial role for this pathway in An. gambiae was based on knock-down experiments on JNK that generated more P. berghei oocysts (Jaramillo-Gutierrez et al., 2010). The pathway was additionally found to indirectly regulate antioxidants and was crucial for preventing chronic oxidative stress. Later, the same group found that the refractory laboratory L3-5 strain of An. gambiae was dependent on JNK signaling for the protection and linked the pathway to epithelial nitration, TEP1 and FBN9 expression and subsequent melanization of the parasite (Garver et al., 2013). Epithelial wounding in Drosophila immediately activates JNK signaling, which induces the expression of leptin-like cytokines of the Unpaired (Upd) family. Secreted Upds interact with the Domeless receptor to activate the Jak/STAT pathway. As a result, hemocytes are recruited to the wound site and melanization is commenced (reviewed in (Wang et al., 2014)). It is likely that the wound response in An. gambiae is carried in a similar manner and that the separately studied JNK and JAK/STAT pathways in the mosquito in fact cooperatively mediate the response to epithelial damage caused by the parasite. It also remains to be determined whether JNK signaling has a profound role in the defence against P. falciparum in nature. Effector responses The TEP1 system The melanization response was early on thought to play a key role in parasite killing as the L3-5 strain, originally selected for resistance against the primate malaria parasite P. cynomolgi, was found to melanize several Plasmodium species (Collins et al., 1986). Several quantitative trait loci (QTL) were subsequently linked to the melanotic refractoriness against P. cynomolgi (Zheng et al., 1997; Zheng et al., 2003). Field caught mosquitoes and susceptible laboratory strain do however seldom melanize parasites. Yet, susceptible mosquitoes kill and subsequently lyse 80 % of parasites (Blandin et al., 2004). Melanization is also not required for bacterial clearance (Schnitger et al., 2007). It was therefore postulated that parasite killing in L3-5 was mediated through other mechanisms and that melanization was rather a way for the mosquito to scavenge already killed parasites. The first QTLs for resistance against P. falciparum in wild-caught An. gambiae (Niare et al., 2002) was later mapped to a single Plasmodium-resistance island (PRI) (Menge et al., 2006; Riehle et al., 2007; Riehle et al., 2006). In 33 parallel, the development of RNAi-based gene silencing (Blandin et al., 2002) was pivotal for the subsequent identification of novel antiplasmodial genes. The technique led to the finding of a complement-like cascade that initially was found to control P. berghei loads (Blandin et al., 2004). The system contains three key proteins: TEP1 that is structurally similar to the vertebrate complement C3 protein (Blandin et al., 2004; Levashina et al., 2001) and two LRR proteins, LRIM1 and APL1C (Dong et al., 2006; Osta et al., 2004; Riehle et al., 2006; Riehle et al., 2008). The TEP-system might signify a unique adaptation to environmental conditions in the mosquito. In contrast to the six TEP-genes found in Drosophila, the An. gambiae genome encodes 15 genes and only one ortholog exist between the two species (Christophides et al., 2002). Also, the TEPs in Drosophila have yet to be assigned a role in the immune response (Bou Aoun et al., 2011). The cascade in An. gambiae is initiated when TEP1 is released into the hemocoel. Here it will be chaperoned by a heterodimer of LRIM1 and APL1C to promote its microbial specificity (Fraiture et al., 2009; Povelones et al., 2009). The complex is then recruited by a non-catalytic serine protease, SPCLIP1, to the surface of microbes and activates a convertase cascade that results in lysis, phagocytosis or melanization (Baxter et al., 2010; Blandin et al., 2004; Povelones et al., 2013). Blandin et al. showed that knock down of TEP1 results in a five-fold P. berghei oocyst increase in L3-5 mosquitoes, which indicates that TEP1 is a prominent marker for resistance in this strain. In line with this finding, the L3-5 strain has allelic TEP1 differences compared to the unselected G3 strain and the degree of susceptibility largely depends on the TEP1 allele (Blandin et al., 2009). TEP1 was originally found to promote phagocytosis of bacteria in cell lines (Levashina et al., 2001) but are together with LRIM1 also required for melanization of Sephadex beads (Warr et al., 2006). It is hence possible that the melanization phenotype often observed in non-natural vector-parasite combinations are due to host recognition of parasite components as xenobiotics. The TEP1 system also regulates P. falciparum infection (Dong et al., 2006; Garver et al., 2009; Warr et al., 2008) although no, or at best subtle, effects have been observed in field-caught mosquitoes (Cohuet et al., 2006; Marois, 2011). The trimeric complex seems more flexible than initially thought, however, and might include alternative components not targeted in these studies. It has for example been shown that that three additional TEPs can interact with LRIM/APL1C (Povelones et al., 2011), and TEP1 is a highly polymorphic chimera of at least two other TEP loci (Obbard et al., 2008). Moreover, the 34 APL1 loci also display remarkable diversity with preserved polymorphisms in the wild (Rottschaefer et al., 2011) and APL1A rather than APL1C is mediating the response to P. falciparum (Mitri et al., 2009). It is plausible that the TEP-system has evolved to target various natural pathogens through the flexible formation of specific complexes. Whether or not the relatively mild fitness cost of P. falciparum infection can cause a selective pressure on a specific TEP-complex in nature remains to be clarified. Also, the TEP-specific microbial structures need to be resolved in order to classify them as true PRRs. Antimicrobial peptides Similar to Drosophila, AMPs are important effectors of the humoral immune response of Anopheles. There is, however, no clear-cut evidence that AMPs comprise a main weapon in the An. gambiae immune arsenal against the malaria parasite. Four AMP families have been found in the An. gambiae genome: four defensins (DEFs), four cecropins (CECs), one gambicin (GAM1) and one attacin (ATT) (Christophides et al., 2002). Of note, Anopheles AMPs seem to be under regulation of both REL1 and REL2 indicating that IMD and Toll signaling are more redundant than in Drosophila (Garver et al., 2009; Luna et al., 2006; Meister et al., 2005). Initial experiments with purified AMPs from the mosquito revealed that CEC1 (Vizioli et al., 2000) and GAM1 (Vizioli et al., 2001a) are active against bacteria of both Gram types whereas DEF1 is mainly active against Gram-positive bacteria and some fungal species (Vizioli et al., 2001b). A modest activity of GAM1 against P. berghei has been shown (Vizioli et al., 2001a) and knock down of the gene increases ookinete numbers of this species but has no effect on that of P. falciparum (Dong et al., 2006). Interestingly, injection of AMPs from other species reduces parasite loads but only if given prior to, or directly after the infectious blood meal (Gwadz et al., 1989; Lowenberger et al., 1999; Shahabuddin et al., 1998). This indicates that AMPs are only effective in a narrow time-window and that timing is a critical factor. The mosquito might not produce AMPs in time to inhibit oocyst formation, possibly as a consequence of the dityrosine mesh formed after blood ingestion. The antiplasmodial activity of AMPs has also been demonstrated using other mosquito-Plasmodium combinations. In Aedes aegypti, co-overexpression of CecA and DefA dramatically reduces P. gallinaceum oocyst formation and blocks sporozoites from reaching the salivary glands (Kokoza et al., 2010). 35 Several AMPs of various origins were lately used in a screen for new candidate peptides against P. berghei and P. falciparum in An. stephensi and An. gambiae, respectively, and were despite promising antiplasmodial effects against cultured parasites not active to the same extent in vivo (Carter et al., 2013). ROS and nitric oxide The production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) and reactive nitrogen species (RNS) have an important role in local, epithelial immunity, but must at the same time be tightly regulated to avoid excessive host tissue damage. The involvement of ROS/RNS in Anopheles immune responses has received attention recently, albeit to a slightly less extent in the last few years. This might be explained by the difficulty in studying such highly reactive compounds and the large number of cellular processes that they affect. The oxidative status of Anopheles mosquitoes has been associated with Plasmodium susceptibility (Kumar et al., 2003).The ingestion of heme in the blood meal is generally thought to generate ROS and the parasite traversal of the midgut epithelium aggravates the oxidative state. The resistant L3-5 strain have higher systemic H2O2 levels prior to and after blood ingestion compared to 4A r/r, which has been selected for high susceptibility. Moreover, the refractory phenotype is reversed by supplementation of antioxidants in the blood meal suggesting that ROS are involved in the antiplasmodial response (Molina-Cruz et al., 2008). The trade-off of the chronic oxidative state in L35 compared to 4A r/r is reflected in a much quicker drop in fecundity with age (DeJong et al., 2007). In Ae. aegypti, heme ingestion has been suggested to instead decrease ROS through the activation of protein kinase C (PKC) signaling (Oliveira et al., 2011). It is possible that similar antioxidant responses to heme are shared between hematophagous insects to quickly neutralize the oxidative burden. Inhibition of PKC was lately shown to significantly decrease P. falciparum oocyst numbers in An. stephensi (Pakpour et al., 2013). The contribution of ROS in this sense has not been studied in anophelines. It is, however, plausible that the oxidative status previously seen in Ae. aegypti plays a major role. Another critical determinant of Anopheles vector capacity is the NOS enzyme (Luckhart et al., 1998). Invaded midgut epithelial cells upregulate the expression of NOS (Gupta et al., 2009). NOS translocates in turn to the cell membrane where it is involved in NO synthesis, but also in nitration of the 36 epithelium together with peroxidases. NO is thought to be directly toxic for the parasite and epithelial nitration is necessary for TEP1-mediated lysis, providing an important link between RNS and the TEP1 system (Oliveira Gde et al., 2012). A proposed explanation is that the nitration event tags parasites that cross the midgut epithelium, which allows subsequent recognition by TEP1. This could in turn potentially be linked to the aforementioned late-stage effect on parasites by the JAK/STAT pathway as it has been found to regulate NOS expression (Gupta et al., 2009). Involvement of NOS in the antibacterial response has also been demonstrated. It was recently demonstrated that knock-down of EATER (homologous to the phagocytic receptor Eater in Drosophila) abrogated the expression of NOS and decreased the ability to combat systemic E. coli infection in An. gambiae (Estevez-Lao and Hillyer, 2013). This finding opens up for future investigations concerning a putative involvement of NOS in the oxidative burst upon bacterial phagocytosis. Gut bacteria, the third player The mosquito gut harbours much fewer bacterial species compared to mammals. The gut microbiota also appear to be remarkably similar between different species of mosquitoes and are often dominated by a single bacterial taxon (Osei-Poku et al., 2012). At the individual level, however, the population composition often differs dramatically and could thus potentially contribute to the varying individual susceptibility to Plasmodium. The relative simplicity provides a good model for dissecting the tripartite interactions between host, gut flora and pathogenic microbes. A fine-tuned manipulation of this system could also have a severe impact on Plasmodium transmission. Following blood ingestion, the gut bacterial bloom sets additional challenges for developing parasites in the mosquito midgut. The bacteria may compete for nutrients and can possibly form physiological barriers, a phenomenon known from vertebrates. Moreover, immune responses raised by the mosquito against bacteria and Plasmodium overlap to a large degree and there is a growing body of evidence that host immune responses raised against gut bacteria also affect the parasite (Dimopoulos et al., 2002). It has for example been shown that co-feedings of either live or heat-killed bacteria cause a decrease in P. falciparum oocysts whereas depletion of gut bacteria with antibiotics yields higher oocyst loads (Dong et al., 2009). Knock down of PGRPLC inhibits the antiplasmodial effect of bacterial co-feeding, suggest37 ing a key role of the mosquito IMD pathway (Meister et al., 2009). Indeed, several IMD-regulated effectors such as the TEP1 system are active against bacteria as well, suggesting that the mosquito mounts similar effectors to combat both bacterial and plasmodial infections (Dong et al., 2006). It has been proposed that former bacterial encounters during larval stages might prime basal immunity, possibly via REL2-S to more quickly combat infections (Frolet et al., 2006). Symbiotic gut bacteria can also directly exert antiplasmodial activity. A resident Enterobacter species from wild A. arabiensis can directly suppress P. falciparum survival through ROS production, further underlining the importance of ROS in parasite resistance (Cirimotich et al., 2011). Only a fraction of field caught mosquitoes carry Enterobacter in their intestine, however (Cirimotich et al., 2011). Much attention has lately been focused on arthropod pathogens of the genus Wolbachia. Symbionts have been found, or introduced in Ae. aegypti that decrease transmission of dengue virus and Plasmodium (Hoffmann et al., 2011; Moreira et al., 2009). These studies have proven an overall more successful inhibition of viruses. A proposed explanation is the shared intracellular nature of the virus and Wolbachia. The antiviral effect of the bacterium has, however, been linked to the host Tolldependent expression of AMPs by bacterially generated ROS (Pan et al., 2012). The results obtained in this study points to an extraceullar effect of indirect nature. The genus Wolbachia seems absent in anophelines (reviewed in (Bourtzis et al., 2013)). Stable infection and vertical transmission were nevertheless recently achieved in An. stephensi by microinjecting bacteria into mosquito embryos (Bian et al., 2013). Females harbouring Wolbachia were significantly less susceptible to P. falciparum. The inhibitory effect has been proposed to be more moderate in the field, however, and invasion and stable transmission of An. gambiae is likely much more challenging (Barillas-Mury, 2013). An alternative strategy is to initially isolate and characterize symbionts that are predominant in both field and laboratory mosquitoes. Promising candidates could subsequently be transformed to express antiplasmodial factors and finally reintroduced in the vector. In a paratransgenesis study on the species combination An. gambiae and P. falciparum, the anopheline symbiont Pantoea agglomerans was successfully transformed to inhibit the parasite (Wang et al., 2012). The separate introduction of five different effectors, 38 including a scorpine (a defensin family member), was found to decrease parasite prevalence with up to 84 %. Elizabethkingia anophelis The genus Elizabethkingia was quite recently proposed as a separate lineage from Chryseobacterium and Flavobacterium, to which it had previously been classified (Kim et al., 2005). So far, three species have been described: E. anopheles, E. meningoseptica and E. miricola. All three are Gramnegative, non-motile, non-spore forming rods and opportunistic pathogens that possess broad antibiotic resistance. Members of Elizabethkingia have been found in wild anophelines (Boissiere et al., 2012; Osei-Poku et al., 2012; Wang et al., 2011), in laboratory-strains (Akhouayri et al., 2013; Kampfer et al., 2011; Li and Tang, 2010; Lindh et al., 2008; Wang et al., 2011) and in aedines (Osei-Poku et al., 2012; Terenius et al., 2012). Interestingly, Elizabethkingia spp. is predominant in the gut of laboratory-reared An. gambiae, suggesting that they are able to exploit an introduced niche (Boissiere et al., 2012). The most well described species, E. meningoseptica (earlier C. meningosepticum), is ubiquitous in nature as well as in hospital environments and is mainly known for causing meningitis in infants (King, 1959). Although infections with the bacterium are rare, treatment regimens are often complicated by its multidrug resistance (Balm et al., 2013). The second characterized species of the genus, E. miricola (earlier C. miricola), was first isolated from condensation water at the MIR space station, suggesting that these bacteria can sustain harsh environments and sterilizing treatments (Li et al., 2003). One clinical case of E. miricola has been reported to date and required the use of last-resort antibiotics to resolve the infection (Green et al., 2008). Attempts to find a suitable symbiont for paratransgenics led to the characterization of the third species in the genus, E. anopheles, isolated from the gut of An. gambiae (Ifakara strain) and was designated R26T (Kampfer et al., 2011). A second strain, Ag1, of the same species was later also isolated by a different lab group from the G3 strain (Wang et al., 2011). Like the other members of the genus, E. anophelis appears to have a broad antimicrobial resistance (Paper IV) (Kampfer et al., 2011). The capacity of E. anopheles to infect immunocompromised humans was recently confirmed in two case reports from the Central African Republic and in a Singapore intensive-care outbreak, respectively (Frank et al., 2013; Teo et al., 2013). 39 Despite the fact that 16S rDNA-sequence comparisons might not be enough to separate the members of Elizabethkingia, isolates have often more or less routinely been referred to as E. meningoseptica. It is thus not yet resolved which species are most prevalent in the wild and in the laboratory respectively. The draft genomes of both species have recently been sequenced and will allow better tools for separating between the two (Paper III) (Matyi et al., 2013). Interestingly, in laboratory-reared An. gambiae, symbiotic E. meningoseptica can turn into a pathogen (Akhouayri et al., 2013). It is possible that the conditional skew towards favouring Elizabethkingia during laboratory conditions also causes this pathogenic effect. Organic extracts from E. meningoseptica have been reported to display both antimicrobial and antiplasmodial activity (Ngwa et al., 2013). Such an effect could potentially contribute to the bacterial predominance in the mosquito gut. In contrast, live E. anophelis bacteria do not seem to generally inhibit the growth of other bacterial gut isolates in vitro (unpublished data). In addition, 90 % of the taxa in wild mosquitoes belong to the phylum Proteobacteria (Boissiere et al., 2012). The antimicrobial activity of E. meningoseptica is therefore likely not a strong determinant of the gut community in the wild mosquitoes. The employment of Elizabethkingia spp. in vector control strategies might be of consideration if the bacteria would turn out to be natural pathogens of An. gambiae. Due to their broad antimicrobial resistance and putative pathogenicity, the employment of Elizabethkingia is, however, always questionable. Plasmodium-derived elicitors Most work on mosquito-parasite interactions done so far has focused on effector responses and ultimately transmission in terms of parasite numbers at different stages. Considerably less is known, however, regarding the underlying mechanisms for recognition and no parasite specific PRRs have yet been revealed. In fact, the key question whether the mosquito mounts a parasite-specific immune response at all remains elusive (Cirimotich et al., 2010). Based on findings in humans and other primates, two putative P. falciparum MAMPs, glycosylphosphatidyl-inositols (GPIs) and hemozoin (Hz), have previously been investigated in the mosquito. GPIs function as universal cell membrane anchors for proteins and are the most common carbohydrate modification in Plasmodium (Gowda et al., 1997). The GPI anchors are indispen40 sable for parasite survival and need to be synthesized de novo during intraerythrocytic stages (Macrae et al., 2013). PfGPIs are regarded as toxins for humans and are thought to mediate many of the symptoms associated with severe malaria pathophysiology (reviewed in (Arrighi and Faye, 2010)). Stimulation of macrophages with purified PfGPIs causes proinflammatory responses through the activation of MAPK/NF-κB pathways and secretion of TNFα, interleukin-6 (IL-6), IL-12 and NO (Lu et al., 2006; Zhu et al., 2005). Depending on the GPI structure, these events are mediated through interactions with TLR2, TLR1 and to a lesser extent TLR4 (Zhu et al., 2011). The PfGPIs are hence fullfilling Janeway’s criteria in humans since they are indispensable for parasite survival and invoke innate responses via interaction with conserved PRRs. Conversely, provision of PfGPIs in the blood meal induces NOS through ERK/Akt signaling in the midgut of An. stephensi (Lim et al., 2005). PfGPIs also induce several AMP genes and affect fecundity in An. gambiae mosquitoes (Arrighi et al., 2009). Interestingly, protozoan GPIs are produced in excess (Ferguson et al., 1994) and the cell surface density of these anchors are generally much higher than in multicellular eukaryotes (Macrae and Ferguson, 2005). Moreover, PfGPIs have been shown to mimic insulin in humans and to some degree An. stephensi, indicating that Plasmodium, and possibly other protozoans might use these compounds to manipulate host metabolism and immune system (reviewed in (Luckhart and Riehle, 2007)). Plasmodium Hz is a dark brown pigment formed during digestion of hemoglobin within host erythrocytes (Francis et al., 1997). Extracted PfHz, as well as synthesised Hz, induce ERK and NF-κB dependent generation of NO in human macrophages (Jaramillo et al., 2005; Jaramillo et al., 2003). In a comparable manner, NOS is induced in PfHz stimulated An. gambiae and An. stephensi cell lines as well as in An. stephensi midgut tissues (AkmanAnderson et al., 2007). The signaling events induced by Hz thus seem to overlap, at least in part, the PfGPI response as both involve Akt and ERK pathway activation. Isoprenoid precursors Isoprenoids are widespread in nature and are indispensable to all living cells (Belmant et al., 2000). This class of molecules are involved in a wide range of metabolic processes and serve as building blocks in the synthesis of various compounds including cholesterol, steroid hormones and vitamins (Fig. 4; reviewed in (Morita et al., 2007)). Organisms synthesize isoprenoids via two 41 different pathways. The mevalonate pathway is found in higher eukaryotes, Archaebacteria and in the cytoplasm of plants. The more recently discovered 2-C-methyl-D-erythritol 4-phosphate (MEP) or 1-deoxy-D-xylulose 5phosphate (DOXP) pathway is found in most Eubacteria, Cyanobacteria and plant chloroplasts (reviewed in (Rohmer, 1999)). Some bacteria such as Listeria monocytogenes (Begley et al., 2004) and Streptomyces (Hamano et al., 2002; Kuzuyama et al., 2000) use both pathways whereas Gram-positive cocci are the most notable example of mevalonate pathway-restricted bacteria (Boucher and Doolittle, 2000). In addition, the MEP pathway is used by parasitic apicomplexan protozoa, including Plasmodium. As the name implies, these carry apicoplasts, a special organelle sharing common ancestry with the chloroplast. There seem to be a general preference for the MEP pathway in intracellular pathogens and the pathway might have evolved due to its lower energy consumption (reviewed in (Heuston et al., 2012)). Due to its non-host specificity, the MEP pathway is an interesting target for novel antiparasitic drugs. Fosmidomycin is an antibiotic that targets DOXP reductoisomerase and inhibits growth of blood-stage malaria parasites (Jomaa et al., 1999). Growth is however restored upon simultaneous supplementation with the central isoprenoid precursor, isopentenyl pyrophosphate (IPP) (Yeh and DeRisi, 2011). Upon continued co-treatment for a few generations, parasites lose their apicoplast and are dependent on IPP supplementation for continued growth. Isoprenoid synthesis thus appears to be the only vital function of this organ during the parasite blood stages. Stimulation of Vγ9Vδ2 T cells T-cells play a central role in most vertebrate immune responses. They are distinguished from other lymphocytes by the presence of cell membrane anchored T cell receptors (TCRs) that recognize antigens. The TCR is composed of two glycoprotein chains that form a heterodimer. Depending on the glycoprotein composition, T cells are divided into αβ or γδ classes. It is still not entirely resolved how γδ T cells are activated (see below). In contrast to αβ T lymphocytes, the typical major histocompatibility complex presentation of antigenic peptides or glycolipids is not required for γδ T cell activation. In humans and higher primates, the vast majority of γδ T cells in the blood express the Vγ9Vδ2 heterodimer (also termed Vγ2Vδ2). Vγ9Vδ2 T cells are stimulated by isoprenoid precursors and other small, pyrophosphorylated, nonpeptide compounds, commonly referred to as phosphoantigens. 42 Figure 4. Schematic figure of the mevalonate and MEP pathways of isoprenoid synthesis. Isoprenoids (orange boxes) are synthesized from the isoprenoid precursors (green boxes) IPP and DMAPP and are in turn used in protein prenylations and as building blocks for various compounds including vitamins, steroids and cholesterol. Plasmodium cannot, however, synthesise sterols and must import these from its host (Labaied et al., 2011). HMGCS, 3-hydroxy-3-methyl-glutaryl-CoA synthase; HMGCR, 3-hydroxy-3-methyl-glutaryl-CoA reductase; MVK, mevalonate kinase; PMVK, phosphomevalonate kinase; MVD, mevalonate-5-pyrophosphate decarboxylase; Pyr, pyruvate; G3P, glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate; DOXP, 1-deoxy-D-xylulose 5-phosphate; MEP, 2-C-methyl-D-erythritol 4-phosphate; CDP-ME, 4diphosphocytidyl-2-C-methylerythritol; CDP-MEP, 4-diphosphocytidyl-2-Cmethylerythritol 2-P; MEcPP, 2-C-methyl-D-erythritol 2,4-cycloPP; IDI1, isopentenyl pyrophosphate isomerase; GPP(S), geranyl pyrophosphate (synthase); FPP(S), farnesyl pyrophosphate (synthase); GGPP, geranylgeranyl pyrophosphate. 43 In absence of stimuli, Vγ9Vδ2 T cells normally constitute 2-5 % of the peripheral blood T cells. In response to several bacterial, viral and protozoan infections including malaria, however, the Vγ9Vδ2 T cell pool expands rapidly and may even exceed the number other lymphocytes within a few days (reviewed in (Morita et al., 2007)). In addition to the proliferative response, stimulated Vγ9Vδ2 T cells acquire cytotoxic functions and secrete proinflammatory cytokines. Activated Vγ9Vδ2 T cells are able to kill Mycobacterium tuberculosis-infected macrophages (Chen et al., 2013; Dieli et al., 2000) and several tumor cell lines (Corvaisier et al., 2005; Guo et al., 2005; Mattarollo et al., 2007) and act as antigen presenting cells to induce antigenspecific αβ T cell responses (Brandes et al., 2009; Brandes et al., 2005; Moser and Eberl, 2007). Vγ9Vδ2 T cells thus act at the border of innate and adaptive immune responses as an important link between the two systems in humans. IPP and HMBPP Isoprenoid precursors represent the most potent natural group of Vγ9Vδ2 T cell activators. Despite major differences in starting material, metabolites and enzymes, both isoprenoid synthesis pathways end up in the synthesis of the central intermediate IPP (Fig. 4). Through analysis of mycobacterial extracts, IPP was identified as the first natural antigen able to stimulate Vγ9Vδ2 T cells (Tanaka et al., 1995). Since IPP is also present endogenously, it was early on suggested that Vγ9Vδ2 T cells are able to somehow discriminate between self and foreign isoprenoid precursors to avoid autoimmune responses. Physiological levels of IPP derived from bacteria that use the mevalonate pathway are, however, not stimulatory (Jomaa et al., 1999). IPP could instead possibly act as an endogenous damage-associated molecular pattern (DAMP) when present in locally high concentrations following release from necrotic host cells or wounded tissues. Metabolic intermediates such as IPP could also serve as specific antigens for a wide range of malignant tumors (Gober et al., 2003). Tumor cells have increased metabolic rates and are therefore likely to contain higher levels of metabolic intermediates. Moreover, some tumor cell lines targeted by γδ T cells appear to have a dysregulated mevalonate pathway. For example, the concentration and efficiency of HMG-CoA reductase, the rate limiting enzyme in the mevalonate pathway, is elevated during leukemia and lymphoma (Harwood et al., 1991). Expanded γδ T cells display highly similar Vγ2 chain repertoires following exposure to either IPP or Daudi cells (a human Burkitt’s lymphoma cell line) 44 Figure 5. The chemical structures of IPP and HMBPP are highly similar. (Hebbeler et al., 2007). Also, inhibition of farnesyl pyrophosphate synthase, the enzyme responsible for converting IPP to farnesyl pyrophosphate (FPP) by bisphosphonates, stimulates γδ T proliferation in most cancer patients, presumably as a consequence of increased IPP concentrations (Fig. 4) (Bonneville and Fournie, 2005; Kunzmann et al., 2000; Kunzmann et al., 1999). The response of γδ T cells to tumors and IPP seems therefore to overlap, at least partly. The mycobacterial isolates used for IPP identification by Tanaka et al. also indicated the presence of additional, yet undefined phosphoantigens. Through successive deletions of bacterial enzymes in the MEP pathway, a precursor to IPP, (E)-4-hydroxy-3-methyl-but-2-enyl pyrophosphate (HMBPP), was found to be a much more potent Vγ9Vδ2 T cell ligand (Hintz et al., 2001). Although structurally similar to IPP, the non-self HMBPP has an approximately 30 000-fold higher bioactivity and stimulates Vγ9Vδ2 T cell expansion at picomolar concentrations (Fig. 5). Recognition and signal transduction The underlying mechanism for the interaction between phosphoantigens and Vγ9Vδ2 T cells is still not entirely resolved. The Vγ9Vδ2 TCR is necessary for phosphoantigen recognition. A tetrameric construct of the receptor has been shown to bind HMBPP (Wei et al., 2008). Moreover, injection of HMBPP causes TCRs to form nanoclusters on the membrane surface of clonally expanding Vγ9Vδ2 T cells in cynomolgus macaques (Chen et al., 2008). Several studies have indicated that IPP and HMBPP do not need to be processed but must associate with an antigen presenting cell (APC) or a membrane in order to be recognized by the TCR (Morita et al., 2001; Wei et 45 al., 2008). Although APCs increase Vγ9Vδ2 T cell responses to soluble phosphoantigens, the presentation can be mediated by non-specialized APCs (Mookerjee-Basu et al., 2010). Interestingly, infection of APCs with MEP pathway negative Staphyolococcus aureus yields comparable Vγ9Vδ2 T cell responses to MEP positive bacteria (Kistowska et al., 2008). Treatment of infected APCs with statins that block the host, but not bacterial mevalonate pathway abrogated the Vγ9Vδ2 T cell response. In addition, accumulation of IPP through bisphosphonate treatment of APCs yielded similar effects to the bacterial infections. Taken together, these results suggest that Vγ9Vδ2 T cell activation in response to infected APCs is not always dependent on the MEP pathway and that the host mevalonate pathway plays an important role. In support of this it was also found that infected APCs upregulate HMG-CoA reductase, similar to previously mentioned tumor cells. Primates thus seem to have evolved the ability to sense bacteria through changes in their own mevalonate pathway. Both HMBPP and IPP trigger activation of several intracellular events and effector responses. Soluble HMBPP induces rapid crosstalk between Vγ9Vδ2 T cells and autologous monocytes, resulting in production and secretion of cytokines and chemokines (Eberl et al., 2009). The functional Vγ9Vδ2 T cell response following both HMBPP (Correia et al., 2009) and IPP (Li and Pauza, 2009) stimulation is dependent on TCR, ERK and PI3K/Akt pathway signaling. HMBPP additionally activates the other main MAPKs (JNK and p38) that are central mediators of TCR signaling transduction (Correia et al., 2009). Furthermore, calcium-dependent nuclear translocation of the NF-κB-related nuclear factor of activated T cells (NFAT) enhances the IPP-induced response (Li and Pauza, 2009). 46 THE PRESENT STUDY Specific aims of the work • • • To explore the immunogenic properties of the isoprenoid precursor and designated phosphoantigen HMBPP in An. gambiae To investigate the immunogenicity of conditioned medium from γirradiated bacteria as a potential tool for studying humoral immune responses in insects To sequence and annotate the An. gambiae gut symbiont E. anophelis Results and discussion The effects of HMBPP in An. gambiae (Paper I) Primates have evolved a unique T cell subset that specifically recognizes phosphoantigens. We wanted to explore whether An. gambiae could also recognize and respond to these compounds. We selected HMBPP due to its microbial origin and immunogenic potency in primates. Initially, HMBPP was tested in parallel with PfGPI in Western blot analysis of MAPK and Akt pathway activation in An. gambiae 4a3B cells and was found to more strongly induce several of these cascades. The cellular response to HMBPP hence overlapped, to quite a degree, the signal pathway activation in human Vγ9Vδ2 T cells and led us to continue studying the mosquito responses to this compound. Importantly, we demonstrated that P. falciparum releases phosphoantigens, likely HMBPP, that induce a strong clonal expansion of Vγ9Vδ2 T cells. To our knowledge, this was the first time such a release was demonstrated and suggests that phagocytosis of the parasite by APCs is not necessarily required for Vγ9Vδ2 T cell activation. Instead, the released phosphoantigens could potentially bind to yet unidentified structures or receptors that in turn present them to the TCR. Such a procedure would thus not necessarily require any initial internalization by APCs. Upon addition of the compound to the blood meal, mosquitoes responded by upregulating several of the selected immune genes. Such a broad activation was surprising, but at the same time pointed towards an Imd/REL2-mediated 47 response. The differential expression patterns did however not completely overlap that observed following provision of DAP-PGN in the blood meal. This gives a hint of a potentially unique response to HMBPP. Several gut bacterial species use the MEP pathway and could hence potentially benefit from the addition of HMBPP. We quantified the relative 16S rDNA abundance and found that the amount of bacteria was temporally altered. This could mean that HMBPP act indirectly through effects on the gut microbiota, which in turn trigger host responses. On the other hand, HMBPP could also act on the bacteria through direct induction of mosquito responses. IPP has previously been shown to confer protection against H2O2 in human fibroblast cells. Such an effect would likely be of benefit for both gut bacteria and Plasmodium. We found that both HMBPP and IPP conferred such a protection in 4a3B cells, although the protective effect of HMBPP had a delayed onset compared to IPP. Further studies are needed to resolve the cause and consequence of this system. The effects of medium from γ-irradiated E. coli on Drosophila humoral immunity (Paper II) Drosophila senses bacteria through pattern-recognition of PGN, a vital component in the bacterial cell wall. The PGN-layer in Gram negative bacteria is however shielded by an outer layer of LPS. It has therefore been debated how the host manages to come in contact with the elicitor. In a recent study, Håkan Steiner’s group demonstrated that supernatants from log-phase bacteria of either Gram-type could induce the AMP gene AttA in Drosophila S2cells (Karlsson et al., 2012). The stimulatory effect was however lost if the bacteria were allowed to grow to stationary phase. The experiment was repeated using different fractions of the supernatants from the Gram negative bacterium E. coli. A response was then observed against the fraction containing TCT, a product of DAP-PGN degradation and a potent inducer of Imd signaling. This suggests that bacteria shed and release PGN during growth. When nutrients are scarce, however, TCT is absorbed and recycled by the bacteria. In the present study, we wanted to explore how γ-irradiation, at a dose to completely halt cell division, affected the bacterial PGN-metabolism. In studies of Drosophila immunity, heat or chemical treatments are regularly employed to inactivate bacterial growth. Inactivation through γ-irradiation is however mainly targeting DNA and are hence likely to better preserve metabolic features and antigenic structures. In the study by Karlsson et al., 2012, 48 heat killing completely abrogated the release of PGN. One of the original aims of this study was therefore to evaluate whether γ-inactivation of E. coli in log-phase would leave the PGN-metabolism intact, and whether it thus could be used as a novel method to study insect immune responses against metabolically active bacteria. Initial experiments were performed by Sandra Oldenvi, a previous member of the Steiner group. Radioactively labelled DAP was added to the suspensions directly after irradiating the bacterial. This allowed an eventual synthesis de novo of PGN to be monitored since the DAP is exclusively used in the stem peptide of PGN. Bacterial supernatants were collected at several time points for up to one week following the radiation-exposure. The results indicated a retained metabolic activity following the irradiation event. We initially also tested UVCirradiation, which yielded promising results. The main issue was, however, that 100 % inactivation of the bacteria could not be achieved, which hindered any long-term time-course studies. Parallel cultures were also maintained without the addition of DAP for later use in the S2-cell assay. The bacteria were initially maintained in a PBS suspension after irradiation without additional nutrients. When collected supernatants were used to stimulate S2-cells, a strong induction of both AttA/B and CecA1 was observed. We failed, however, to detect any release of radioactive TCT, indicating that the observed effect on S2-cells was rather due to bacterial lysis and cumulative release of elicitors. The experiment was subsequently repeated using minimal-medium instead of PBS. Using HPLC in combination with a scintillation counter, we observed a post irradiation-increase in radioactivity over time in the HPLCfraction corresponding to TCT. The fraction was subsequently found to contain TCT using MALDI-TOF. Next, the supernatants were used to stimulate S2-cells. In contrast to our previous experiments, the expression of AttA/B decreased whereas CecA1 still increased relative to the post-irradiation incubation time of the supernatants. The expression of both attacins and cecropins have been reported to be dependent on both Toll and Imd signaling. Toll signaling in Drosophila cell lines is however not activated by external stimuli, likely due to a lack of the extracellular components of the pathway. We hence selected supernatants from late time point (72 h) and repeated the experiment following RNAi-mediated knock-down of Relish, the NF-κB of the Imd pathway. This resulted in a decreased expression in the S2-cells, suggesting that the bacterial medium from prolonged incubation still triggers 49 the Imd signaling pathway. As this pattern has not been observed before, we performed a whole transcriptome analysis. The unique nature of the response was confirmed and in addition it showed a number of stress genes, e.g. heat shock genes, to be induced that are not usually part of the innate immune response. Taken together, these findings render it likely that some of the elicitors are derived from peptidoglycan. The nature of the elicitor(s) causing the more stress like part of the response, however, remains elusive. Genome annotation of E. anophelis (Paper III and IV) The gut microbiota of An. gambiae have a profound impact on Plasmodium infection. The isolation and characterization of abundant taxa will aid in identifying the causative species and also find suitable candidates for vector control and paratransgenesis strategies. In these studies, we sequenced and annotated the genome of E. anophelis, a predominant gut symbiont of An. gambiae. Two different strains were sequenced. The type strain, R26T was isolated from the Ifakara strain of An. gambiae in our laboratory at Stockholm University and Ag1 was derived from the G3 strain in Xu’s laboratory, New Mexico. Upon comparison, both strains were with a few exceptions identical. The annotation revealed several features of the bacterium that could potentially contribute to its symbiotic relation with the mosquito host. Also, a large number of genes involved in antibiotic resistance were found, including β-lactamases, metallo-β-lactamases and efflux pumps that appear overall conserved within the family Flavobacteriaceae. However, we also found signs of lateral gene transfer of metallo-β-lactamases genes, which has been shown to occur between other species in nature. The R26T strain has previously been found to display resistance against several antibiotics. Here we demonstrate additional strong resistance against CecA as well as the previously applied antibiotic ciprofloxacin in the treatment of E. meningoseptica infection. Although not included in the present paper, we additionally performed crossstreaks and found that intact and growing E. anophelis inhibited one out of eight Anopheles midgut isolates. This contrasts a previous report where extracts from lysed E. meningoseptica displayed broad antimicrobial activity (Ngwa et al., 2013). It is therefore possible that E. anophelis is adapted to co-exist with other gut symbionts. Recent reports of opportunistic pathogenicity of E. anophelis warrants further studies to elucidate whether these 50 bacteria can spread to humans from mosquitoes or not. In light of this, we found that the bacterium displays α-hemolytic activity, which could potentially contribute to the mosquito blood digestion but also add to its virulence in humans. Taken together, these findings question the potential use of E. anophelis in future malaria intervention strategies. It might nevertheless be of interest for the community to investigate the cause and consequence of its predominance in the gut of laboratory reared anophelines as this could potentially affect the interpretations of various studies. It would also be of interest to evaluate its potential antiplasmodial activity in the mosquito gut. CONCLUDING REMARKS The global malaria problem is far from resolved, and novel measures for controlling the disease are desperately needed. Findings from basic research are constantly increasing knowledge of the disease that could lead to development of new treatment strategies. In this sense, An. gambiae has become an important model organism, not only for studying malaria, but also for deciphering insect-parasite interactions and innate immune responses in general. Working with this species has its downsides, however, due to the difficulties in performing forward genetic screens, transformations and standardization of rearing measures for obtaining repeatable infection experiments. In this sense, Drosophila is an excellent model organism. It is therefore slightly surprising that so few specialists are performing cross-species collaborations. I have had the chance to join this exciting scientific community and participate in studies revolving various topics, which forced me to broaden my knowledge. Although not all commenced projects were successful, they have all allowed me to grow as a scientist. The findings presented by me and co-workers will hopefully aid in broadening the picture of immune recognition and the contribution of gut symbionts in An. gambiae. 51 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS First of all to my supervisor Ingrid Faye for giving me the opportunity to join the scientific community and for always being supportive and encouraging throughout the project. To Håkan Steiner, Jiannong Xu and Ingela Parmryd for constructive and fruitful collaborations. To my co-supervisor Ylva Engström and the always helpful fly-folks at Molbio. To Marita Troye Blomberg and the members of her group for the good support, for the lending of happy and frisky parasites and for backing me up financially for the EMBL meeting in Heidelberg. Many thanks also to my group members Melanie and Noushin for all the support and for keeping up the good spirit. To my roommates Harald and Ali for sharing the good times and the grumpy times, and several nice moments in the gym. Good luck with your projects and do not give up on CRISPR/Cas. The MBW floorball-players throughout the years. If it were not for you, I would not have picked up this great sport again after more than 15 years without touching a stick. Of course, to all people at the old GMT and the administrative staff, especially Eva and Eva, I-B and Görel. And finally, but not least to Sanna and my family for your endless support and patience. 52 REFERENCES Adams, M.D., Celniker, S.E., Holt, R.A., Evans, C.A., Gocayne, J.D., Amanatides, P.G., Scherer, S.E., Li, P.W., Hoskins, R.A., Galle, R.F., et al. (2000). The genome sequence of Drosophila melanogaster. Science (New York, NY) 287, 2185-2195. Agaisse, H., Petersen, U.M., Boutros, M., Mathey-Prevot, B., and Perrimon, N. (2003). Signaling role of hemocytes in Drosophila JAK/STAT-dependent response to septic injury. Developmental cell 5, 441-450. Aggarwal, K., Rus, F., Vriesema-Magnuson, C., Erturk-Hasdemir, D., Paquette, N., and Silverman, N. (2008). Rudra interrupts receptor signaling complexes to negatively regulate the IMD pathway. PLoS pathogens 4, e1000120. Ahmed, A.M., and Hurd, H. (2006). Immune stimulation and malaria infection impose reproductive costs in Anopheles gambiae via follicular apoptosis. Microbes and infection / Institut Pasteur 8, 308-315. Ahmed, A.M., Maingon, R., Romans, P., and Hurd, H. (2001). Effects of malaria infection on vitellogenesis in Anopheles gambiae during two gonotrophic cycles. Insect molecular biology 10, 347-356. Akhouayri, I., Turc, C., Royet, J., and Charroux, B. (2011). Toll-8/Tollo negatively regulates antimicrobial response in the Drosophila respiratory epithelium. PLoS pathogens 7, e1002319. Akhouayri, I.G., Habtewold, T., and Christophides, G.K. (2013). Melanotic pathology and vertical transmission of the gut commensal Elizabethkingia meningoseptica in the major malaria vector Anopheles gambiae. PloS one 8, e77619. Akman-Anderson, L., Olivier, M., and Luckhart, S. (2007). Induction of nitric oxide synthase and activation of signaling proteins in Anopheles mosquitoes by the malaria pigment, hemozoin. Infection and immunity 75, 4012-4019. Aly, A.S., Vaughan, A.M., and Kappe, S.H. (2009). Malaria parasite development in the mosquito and infection of the mammalian host. Annual review of microbiology 63, 195-221. Anderson, R.A., Knols, B.G., and Koella, J.C. (2000). Plasmodium falciparum sporozoites increase feeding-associated mortality of their mosquito hosts Anopheles gambiae s.l. Parasitology 120 ( Pt 4), 329-333. 53 Arrighi, R.B., Debierre-Grockiego, F., Schwarz, R.T., and Faye, I. (2009). The immunogenic properties of protozoan glycosylphosphatidylinositols in the mosquito Anopheles gambiae. Developmental and comparative immunology 33, 216-223. Arrighi, R.B., and Faye, I. (2010). Plasmodium falciparum GPI toxin: a common foe for man and mosquito. Acta tropica 114, 162-165. Atilano, M.L., Yates, J., Glittenberg, M., Filipe, S.R., and Ligoxygakis, P. (2011). Wall teichoic acids of Staphylococcus aureus limit recognition by the drosophila peptidoglycan recognition protein-SA to promote pathogenicity. PLoS pathogens 7, e1002421. Bahia, A.C., Kubota, M.S., Tempone, A.J., Araujo, H.R., Guedes, B.A., Orfano, A.S., Tadei, W.P., Rios-Velasquez, C.M., Han, Y.S., Secundino, N.F., et al. (2011). The JAK-STAT pathway controls Plasmodium vivax load in early stages of Anopheles aquasalis infection. PLoS neglected tropical diseases 5, e1317. Bai, H., Kang, P., Hernandez, A.M., and Tatar, M. (2013). Activin signaling targeted by insulin/dFOXO regulates aging and muscle proteostasis in Drosophila. PLoS genetics 9, e1003941. Balm, M.N., Salmon, S., Jureen, R., Teo, C., Mahdi, R., Seetoh, T., Teo, J.T., Lin, R.T., and Fisher, D.A. (2013). Bad design, bad practices, bad bugs: frustrations in controlling an outbreak of Elizabethkingia meningoseptica in intensive care units. The Journal of hospital infection 85, 134-140. Barillas-Mury, C. (2013). Modulating malaria with Wolbachia. Nature medicine 19, 974-975. Barillas-Mury, C., Han, Y.S., Seeley, D., and Kafatos, F.C. (1999). Anopheles gambiae Ag-STAT, a new insect member of the STAT family, is activated in response to bacterial infection. The EMBO journal 18, 959-967. Basbous, N., Coste, F., Leone, P., Vincentelli, R., Royet, J., Kellenberger, C., and Roussel, A. (2011). The Drosophila peptidoglycan-recognition protein LF interacts with peptidoglycan-recognition protein LC to downregulate the Imd pathway. EMBO reports 12, 327-333. Baton, L.A., and Ranford-Cartwright, L.C. (2005). Spreading the seeds of million-murdering death: metamorphoses of malaria in the mosquito. Trends in parasitology 21, 573-580. Baxter, R.H., Steinert, S., Chelliah, Y., Volohonsky, G., Levashina, E.A., and Deisenhofer, J. (2010). A heterodimeric complex of the LRR proteins LRIM1 and APL1C regulates complement-like immunity in Anopheles 54 gambiae. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 107, 16817-16822. Becker, T., Loch, G., Beyer, M., Zinke, I., Aschenbrenner, A.C., Carrera, P., Inhester, T., Schultze, J.L., and Hoch, M. (2010). FOXO-dependent regulation of innate immune homeostasis. Nature 463, 369-373. Begley, M., Gahan, C.G., Kollas, A.K., Hintz, M., Hill, C., Jomaa, H., and Eberl, M. (2004). The interplay between classical and alternative isoprenoid biosynthesis controls gammadelta T cell bioactivity of Listeria monocytogenes. FEBS letters 561, 99-104. Belmant, C., Espinosa, E., Halary, F., Tang, Y., Peyrat, M.A., Sicard, H., Kozikowski, A., Buelow, R., Poupot, R., Bonneville, M., et al. (2000). A chemical basis for selective recognition of nonpeptide antigens by human delta T cells. FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology 14, 1669-1670. Bian, G., Joshi, D., Dong, Y., Lu, P., Zhou, G., Pan, X., Xu, Y., Dimopoulos, G., and Xi, Z. (2013). Wolbachia invades Anopheles stephensi populations and induces refractoriness to Plasmodium infection. Science (New York, NY) 340, 748-751. Bischoff, V., Vignal, C., Boneca, I.G., Michel, T., Hoffmann, J.A., and Royet, J. (2004). Function of the drosophila pattern-recognition receptor PGRP-SD in the detection of Gram-positive bacteria. Nature immunology 5, 1175-1180. Bischoff, V., Vignal, C., Duvic, B., Boneca, I.G., Hoffmann, J.A., and Royet, J. (2006). Downregulation of the Drosophila immune response by peptidoglycan-recognition proteins SC1 and SC2. PLoS pathogens 2, e14. Blandin, S., Moita, L.F., Kocher, T., Wilm, M., Kafatos, F.C., and Levashina, E.A. (2002). Reverse genetics in the mosquito Anopheles gambiae: targeted disruption of the Defensin gene. EMBO reports 3, 852856. Blandin, S., Shiao, S.H., Moita, L.F., Janse, C.J., Waters, A.P., Kafatos, F.C., and Levashina, E.A. (2004). Complement-like protein TEP1 is a determinant of vectorial capacity in the malaria vector Anopheles gambiae. Cell 116, 661-670. Blandin, S.A., Wang-Sattler, R., Lamacchia, M., Gagneur, J., Lycett, G., Ning, Y., Levashina, E.A., and Steinmetz, L.M. (2009). Dissecting the genetic basis of resistance to malaria parasites in Anopheles gambiae. Science (New York, NY) 326, 147-150. 55 Boissiere, A., Tchioffo, M.T., Bachar, D., Abate, L., Marie, A., Nsango, S.E., Shahbazkia, H.R., Awono-Ambene, P.H., Levashina, E.A., Christen, R., et al. (2012). Midgut microbiota of the malaria mosquito vector Anopheles gambiae and interactions with Plasmodium falciparum infection. PLoS pathogens 8, e1002742. Boman, H.G., Nilsson, I., and Rasmuson, B. (1972). Inducible antibacterial defence system in Drosophila. Nature 237, 232-235. Bonneville, M., and Fournie, J.J. (2005). Sensing cell stress and transformation through Vgamma9Vdelta2 T cell-mediated recognition of the isoprenoid pathway metabolites. Microbes and infection / Institut Pasteur 7, 503-509. Bosco-Drayon, V., Poidevin, M., Boneca, I.G., Narbonne-Reveau, K., Royet, J., and Charroux, B. (2012). Peptidoglycan sensing by the receptor PGRP-LE in the Drosophila gut induces immune responses to infectious bacteria and tolerance to microbiota. Cell host & microbe 12, 153-165. Bou Aoun, R., Hetru, C., Troxler, L., Doucet, D., Ferrandon, D., and Matt, N. (2011). Analysis of thioester-containing proteins during the innate immune response of Drosophila melanogaster. Journal of innate immunity 3, 52-64. Boucher, Y., and Doolittle, W.F. (2000). The role of lateral gene transfer in the evolution of isoprenoid biosynthesis pathways. Molecular microbiology 37, 703-716. Bourtzis, K., Dobson, S.L., Xi, Z., Rasgon, J.L., Calvitti, M., Moreira, L.A., Bossin, H.C., Moretti, R., Baton, L.A., Hughes, G.L., et al. (2013). Harnessing mosquito-Wolbachia symbiosis for vector and disease control. Acta tropica. Boutros, M., Agaisse, H., and Perrimon, N. (2002). Sequential activation of signaling pathways during innate immune responses in Drosophila. Developmental cell 3, 711-722. Boyer, L., Magoc, L., Dejardin, S., Cappillino, M., Paquette, N., Hinault, C., Charriere, G.M., Ip, W.K., Fracchia, S., Hennessy, E., et al. (2011). Pathogen-derived effectors trigger protective immunity via activation of the Rac2 enzyme and the IMD or Rip kinase signaling pathway. Immunity 35, 536-549. Brandes, M., Willimann, K., Bioley, G., Levy, N., Eberl, M., Luo, M., Tampe, R., Levy, F., Romero, P., and Moser, B. (2009). Cross-presenting human gammadelta T cells induce robust CD8+ alphabeta T cell responses. 56 Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 106, 2307-2312. Brandes, M., Willimann, K., and Moser, B. (2005). Professional antigenpresentation function by human gammadelta T Cells. Science (New York, NY) 309, 264-268. Busse, M.S., Arnold, C.P., Towb, P., Katrivesis, J., and Wasserman, S.A. (2007). A kappaB sequence code for pathway-specific innate immune responses. The EMBO journal 26, 3826-3835. Carter, V., Underhill, A., Baber, I., Sylla, L., Baby, M., Larget-Thiery, I., Zettor, A., Bourgouin, C., Langel, U., Faye, I., et al. (2013). Killer bee molecules: antimicrobial peptides as effector molecules to target sporogonic stages of Plasmodium. PLoS pathogens 9, e1003790. Castillo, J.C., Robertson, A.E., and Strand, M.R. (2006). Characterization of hemocytes from the mosquitoes Anopheles gambiae and Aedes aegypti. Insect biochemistry and molecular biology 36, 891-903. Chang, C.I., Chelliah, Y., Borek, D., Mengin-Lecreulx, D., and Deisenhofer, J. (2006). Structure of tracheal cytotoxin in complex with a heterodimeric pattern-recognition receptor. Science (New York, NY) 311, 1761-1764. Chang, C.I., Ihara, K., Chelliah, Y., Mengin-Lecreulx, D., Wakatsuki, S., and Deisenhofer, J. (2005). Structure of the ectodomain of Drosophila peptidoglycan-recognition protein LCa suggests a molecular mechanism for pattern recognition. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 102, 10279-10284. Chen, C.Y., Yao, S., Huang, D., Wei, H., Sicard, H., Zeng, G., Jomaa, H., Larsen, M.H., Jacobs, W.R., Jr., Wang, R., et al. (2013). Phosphoantigen/IL2 expansion and differentiation of Vgamma2Vdelta2 T cells increase resistance to tuberculosis in nonhuman primates. PLoS pathogens 9, e1003501. Chen, Y., Shao, L., Ali, Z., Cai, J., and Chen, Z.W. (2008). NSOM/QDbased nanoscale immunofluorescence imaging of antigen-specific T-cell receptor responses during an in vivo clonal Vgamma2Vdelta2 T-cell expansion. Blood 111, 4220-4232. Choe, K.M., Lee, H., and Anderson, K.V. (2005). Drosophila peptidoglycan recognition protein LC (PGRP-LC) acts as a signal-transducing innate immune receptor. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 102, 1122-1126. 57 Choe, K.M., Werner, T., Stoven, S., Hultmark, D., and Anderson, K.V. (2002). Requirement for a peptidoglycan recognition protein (PGRP) in Relish activation and antibacterial immune responses in Drosophila. Science (New York, NY) 296, 359-362. Christophides, G.K., Zdobnov, E., Barillas-Mury, C., Birney, E., Blandin, S., Blass, C., Brey, P.T., Collins, F.H., Danielli, A., Dimopoulos, G., et al. (2002). Immunity-related genes and gene families in Anopheles gambiae. Science (New York, NY) 298, 159-165. Chung, Y.S., and Kocks, C. (2011). Recognition of pathogenic microbes by the Drosophila phagocytic pattern recognition receptor Eater. The Journal of biological chemistry 286, 26524-26532. Cirimotich, C.M., Dong, Y., Clayton, A.M., Sandiford, S.L., Souza-Neto, J.A., Mulenga, M., and Dimopoulos, G. (2011). Natural microbe-mediated refractoriness to Plasmodium infection in Anopheles gambiae. Science (New York, NY) 332, 855-858. Cirimotich, C.M., Dong, Y., Garver, L.S., Sim, S., and Dimopoulos, G. (2010). Mosquito immune defenses against Plasmodium infection. Developmental and comparative immunology 34, 387-395. Cohuet, A., Osta, M.A., Morlais, I., Awono-Ambene, P.H., Michel, K., Simard, F., Christophides, G.K., Fontenille, D., and Kafatos, F.C. (2006). Anopheles and Plasmodium: from laboratory models to natural systems in the field. EMBO reports 7, 1285-1289. Collins, F.H., Sakai, R.K., Vernick, K.D., Paskewitz, S., Seeley, D.C., Miller, L.H., Collins, W.E., Campbell, C.C., and Gwadz, R.W. (1986). Genetic selection of a Plasmodium-refractory strain of the malaria vector Anopheles gambiae. Science (New York, NY) 234, 607-610. Corbo, J.C., and Levine, M. (1996). Characterization of an immunodeficiency mutant in Drosophila. Mechanisms of development 55, 211-220. Corby-Harris, V., Drexler, A., Watkins de Jong, L., Antonova, Y., Pakpour, N., Ziegler, R., Ramberg, F., Lewis, E.E., Brown, J.M., Luckhart, S., et al. (2010). Activation of Akt signaling reduces the prevalence and intensity of malaria parasite infection and lifespan in Anopheles stephensi mosquitoes. PLoS pathogens 6, e1001003. Correia, D.V., d'Orey, F., Cardoso, B.A., Lanca, T., Grosso, A.R., deBarros, A., Martins, L.R., Barata, J.T., and Silva-Santos, B. (2009). Highly active microbial phosphoantigen induces rapid yet sustained MEK/Erk- and PI- 58 3K/Akt-mediated signal transduction in anti-tumor human gammadelta Tcells. PloS one 4, e5657. Corvaisier, M., Moreau-Aubry, A., Diez, E., Bennouna, J., Mosnier, J.F., Scotet, E., Bonneville, M., and Jotereau, F. (2005). V gamma 9V delta 2 T cell response to colon carcinoma cells. Journal of immunology (Baltimore, Md : 1950) 175, 5481-5488. David, A.S., Kaser, J.M., Morey, A.C., Roth, A.M., and Andow, D.A. (2013). Release of genetically engineered insects: a framework to identify potential ecological effects. Ecology and evolution 3, 4000-4015. DeJong, R.J., Miller, L.M., Molina-Cruz, A., Gupta, L., Kumar, S., and Barillas-Mury, C. (2007). Reactive oxygen species detoxification by catalase is a major determinant of fecundity in the mosquito Anopheles gambiae. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 104, 2121-2126. Demontis, F., and Perrimon, N. (2010). FOXO/4E-BP signaling in Drosophila muscles regulates organism-wide proteostasis during aging. Cell 143, 813-825. Desowitz, R.S. (2005). Milestones and millstones in the history of malaria. In: Malaria: Molecular and Clinical Aspects. M. Wahlgren, P. Perlmann, ed. (Harwood Academic Publishers), pp. 1-16. Dieli, F., Troye-Blomberg, M., Ivanyi, J., Fournie, J.J., Bonneville, M., Peyrat, M.A., Sireci, G., and Salerno, A. (2000). Vgamma9/Vdelta2 T lymphocytes reduce the viability of intracellular Mycobacterium tuberculosis. European journal of immunology 30, 1512-1519. Dimopoulos, G., Christophides, G.K., Meister, S., Schultz, J., White, K.P., Barillas-Mury, C., and Kafatos, F.C. (2002). Genome expression analysis of Anopheles gambiae: responses to injury, bacterial challenge, and malaria infection. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 99, 8814-8819. Dong, Y., Aguilar, R., Xi, Z., Warr, E., Mongin, E., and Dimopoulos, G. (2006). Anopheles gambiae immune responses to human and rodent Plasmodium parasite species. PLoS pathogens 2, e52. Dong, Y., Das, S., Cirimotich, C., Souza-Neto, J.A., McLean, K.J., and Dimopoulos, G. (2011). Engineered anopheles immunity to Plasmodium infection. PLoS pathogens 7, e1002458. 59 Dong, Y., Manfredini, F., and Dimopoulos, G. (2009). Implication of the mosquito midgut microbiota in the defense against malaria parasites. PLoS pathogens 5, e1000423. Dostert, C., Jouanguy, E., Irving, P., Troxler, L., Galiana-Arnoux, D., Hetru, C., Hoffmann, J.A., and Imler, J.L. (2005). The Jak-STAT signaling pathway is required but not sufficient for the antiviral response of drosophila. Nature immunology 6, 946-953. Dushay, M.S., Asling, B., and Hultmark, D. (1996). Origins of immunity: Relish, a compound Rel-like gene in the antibacterial defense of Drosophila. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 93, 10343-10347. Eberl, M., Roberts, G.W., Meuter, S., Williams, J.D., Topley, N., and Moser, B. (2009). A rapid crosstalk of human gammadelta T cells and monocytes drives the acute inflammation in bacterial infections. PLoS pathogens 5, e1000308. El Chamy, L., Leclerc, V., Caldelari, I., and Reichhart, J.M. (2008). Sensing of 'danger signals' and pathogen-associated molecular patterns defines binary signaling pathways 'upstream' of Toll. Nature immunology 9, 1165-1170. Eleftherianos, I., and Revenis, C. (2011). Role and importance of phenoloxidase in insect hemostasis. Journal of innate immunity 3, 28-33. Engstrom, Y., Kadalayil, L., Sun, S.C., Samakovlis, C., Hultmark, D., and Faye, I. (1993). kappa B-like motifs regulate the induction of immune genes in Drosophila. Journal of molecular biology 232, 327-333. Estevez-Lao, T.Y., and Hillyer, J.F. (2013). Involvement of the Anopheles gambiae Nimrod gene family in mosquito immune responses. Insect biochemistry and molecular biology 44c, 12-22. Ferguson, M.A., Brimacombe, J.S., Cottaz, S., Field, R.A., Guther, L.S., Homans, S.W., McConville, M.J., Mehlert, A., Milne, K.G., Ralton, J.E., et al. (1994). Glycosyl-phosphatidylinositol molecules of the parasite and the host. Parasitology 108 Suppl, S45-54. Ferrandon, D., Jung, A.C., Criqui, M., Lemaitre, B., Uttenweiler-Joseph, S., Michaut, L., Reichhart, J., and Hoffmann, J.A. (1998). A drosomycin-GFP reporter transgene reveals a local immune response in Drosophila that is not dependent on the Toll pathway. The EMBO journal 17, 1217-1227. Filipe, S.R., Tomasz, A., and Ligoxygakis, P. (2005). Requirements of peptidoglycan structure that allow detection by the Drosophila Toll pathway. EMBO reports 6, 327-333. 60 Fraiture, M., Baxter, R.H., Steinert, S., Chelliah, Y., Frolet, C., QuispeTintaya, W., Hoffmann, J.A., Blandin, S.A., and Levashina, E.A. (2009). Two mosquito LRR proteins function as complement control factors in the TEP1-mediated killing of Plasmodium. Cell host & microbe 5, 273-284. Francis, S.E., Sullivan, D.J., Jr., and Goldberg, D.E. (1997). Hemoglobin metabolism in the malaria parasite Plasmodium falciparum. Annual review of microbiology 51, 97-123. Frank, T., Gody, J.C., Nguyen, L.B., Berthet, N., Le Fleche-Mateos, A., Bata, P., Rafai, C., Kazanji, M., and Breurec, S. (2013). First case of Elizabethkingia anophelis meningitis in the Central African Republic. Lancet 381, 1876. Frolet, C., Thoma, M., Blandin, S., Hoffmann, J.A., and Levashina, E.A. (2006). Boosting NF-kappaB-dependent basal immunity of Anopheles gambiae aborts development of Plasmodium berghei. Immunity 25, 677-685. Garver, L.S., Bahia, A.C., Das, S., Souza-Neto, J.A., Shiao, J., Dong, Y., and Dimopoulos, G. (2012). Anopheles Imd pathway factors and effectors in infection intensity-dependent anti-Plasmodium action. PLoS pathogens 8, e1002737. Garver, L.S., de Almeida Oliveira, G., and Barillas-Mury, C. (2013). The JNK pathway is a key mediator of Anopheles gambiae antiplasmodial immunity. PLoS pathogens 9, e1003622. Garver, L.S., Dong, Y., and Dimopoulos, G. (2009). Caspar controls resistance to Plasmodium falciparum in diverse anopheline species. PLoS pathogens 5, e1000335. Garver, L.S., Wu, J., and Wu, L.P. (2006). The peptidoglycan recognition protein PGRP-SC1a is essential for Toll signaling and phagocytosis of Staphylococcus aureus in Drosophila. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 103, 660-665. Gendrin, M., Welchman, D.P., Poidevin, M., Herve, M., and Lemaitre, B. (2009). Long-range activation of systemic immunity through peptidoglycan diffusion in Drosophila. PLoS pathogens 5, e1000694. Gendrin, M., Zaidman-Remy, A., Broderick, N.A., Paredes, J., Poidevin, M., Roussel, A., and Lemaitre, B. (2013). Functional analysis of PGRP-LA in Drosophila immunity. PloS one 8, e69742. Gober, H.J., Kistowska, M., Angman, L., Jeno, P., Mori, L., and De Libero, G. (2003). Human T cell receptor gammadelta cells recognize endogenous 61 mevalonate metabolites in tumor cells. The Journal of experimental medicine 197, 163-168. Gobert, V., Gottar, M., Matskevich, A.A., Rutschmann, S., Royet, J., Belvin, M., Hoffmann, J.A., and Ferrandon, D. (2003). Dual activation of the Drosophila toll pathway by two pattern recognition receptors. Science (New York, NY) 302, 2126-2130. Goto, A., Yano, T., Terashima, J., Iwashita, S., Oshima, Y., and Kurata, S. (2010). Cooperative regulation of the induction of the novel antibacterial Listericin by peptidoglycan recognition protein LE and the JAK-STAT pathway. The Journal of biological chemistry 285, 15731-15738. Gottar, M., Gobert, V., Matskevich, A.A., Reichhart, J.M., Wang, C., Butt, T.M., Belvin, M., Hoffmann, J.A., and Ferrandon, D. (2006). Dual detection of fungal infections in Drosophila via recognition of glucans and sensing of virulence factors. Cell 127, 1425-1437. Gottar, M., Gobert, V., Michel, T., Belvin, M., Duyk, G., Hoffmann, J.A., Ferrandon, D., and Royet, J. (2002). The Drosophila immune response against Gram-negative bacteria is mediated by a peptidoglycan recognition protein. Nature 416, 640-644. Gowda, D.C., Gupta, P., and Davidson, E.A. (1997). Glycosylphosphatidylinositol anchors represent the major carbohydrate modification in proteins of intraerythrocytic stage Plasmodium falciparum. The Journal of biological chemistry 272, 6428-6439. Green, O., Murray, P., and Gea-Banacloche, J.C. (2008). Sepsis caused by Elizabethkingia miricola successfully treated with tigecycline and levofloxacin. Diagnostic microbiology and infectious disease 62, 430-432. Guo, B.L., Liu, Z., Aldrich, W.A., and Lopez, R.D. (2005). Innate antibreast cancer immunity of apoptosis-resistant human gammadelta-T cells. Breast cancer research and treatment 93, 169-175. Gupta, L., Molina-Cruz, A., Kumar, S., Rodrigues, J., Dixit, R., Zamora, R.E., and Barillas-Mury, C. (2009). The STAT pathway mediates late-phase immunity against Plasmodium in the mosquito Anopheles gambiae. Cell host & microbe 5, 498-507. Gwadz, R.W., Kaslow, D., Lee, J.Y., Maloy, W.L., Zasloff, M., and Miller, L.H. (1989). Effects of magainins and cecropins on the sporogonic development of malaria parasites in mosquitoes. Infection and immunity 57, 2628-2633. 62 Hamano, Y., Dairi, T., Yamamoto, M., Kuzuyama, T., Itoh, N., and Seto, H. (2002). Growth-phase dependent expression of the mevalonate pathway in a terpenoid antibiotic-producing Streptomyces strain. Bioscience, biotechnology, and biochemistry 66, 808-819. Harwood, H.J., Jr., Alvarez, I.M., Noyes, W.D., and Stacpoole, P.W. (1991). In vivo regulation of human leukocyte 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase: increased enzyme protein concentration and catalytic efficiency in human leukemia and lymphoma. Journal of lipid research 32, 1237-1252. Hashimoto, Y., Tabuchi, Y., Sakurai, K., Kutsuna, M., Kurokawa, K., Awasaki, T., Sekimizu, K., Nakanishi, Y., and Shiratsuchi, A. (2009). Identification of lipoteichoic acid as a ligand for draper in the phagocytosis of Staphylococcus aureus by Drosophila hemocytes. Journal of immunology (Baltimore, Md : 1950) 183, 7451-7460. Hayashi, F., Smith, K.D., Ozinsky, A., Hawn, T.R., Yi, E.C., Goodlett, D.R., Eng, J.K., Akira, S., Underhill, D.M., and Aderem, A. (2001). The innate immune response to bacterial flagellin is mediated by Toll-like receptor 5. Nature 410, 1099-1103. Hebbeler, A.M., Cairo, C., Cummings, J.S., and Pauza, C.D. (2007). Individual Vgamma2-Jgamma1.2+ T cells respond to both isopentenyl pyrophosphate and Daudi cell stimulation: generating tumor effectors with low molecular weight phosphoantigens. Cancer immunology, immunotherapy : CII 56, 819-829. Hedengren-Olcott, M., Olcott, M.C., Mooney, D.T., Ekengren, S., Geller, B.L., and Taylor, B.J. (2004). Differential activation of the NF-kappaB-like factors Relish and Dif in Drosophila melanogaster by fungi and Grampositive bacteria. The Journal of biological chemistry 279, 21121-21127. Hedengren, M., Asling, B., Dushay, M.S., Ando, I., Ekengren, S., Wihlborg, M., and Hultmark, D. (1999). Relish, a central factor in the control of humoral but not cellular immunity in Drosophila. Molecular cell 4, 827-837. Heuston, S., Begley, M., Gahan, C.G., and Hill, C. (2012). Isoprenoid biosynthesis in bacterial pathogens. Microbiology (Reading, England) 158, 1389-1401. Hintz, M., Reichenberg, A., Altincicek, B., Bahr, U., Gschwind, R.M., Kollas, A.K., Beck, E., Wiesner, J., Eberl, M., and Jomaa, H. (2001). Identification of (E)-4-hydroxy-3-methyl-but-2-enyl pyrophosphate as a major activator for human gammadelta T cells in Escherichia coli. FEBS letters 509, 317-322. 63 Hoffmann, A.A., Montgomery, B.L., Popovici, J., Iturbe-Ormaetxe, I., Johnson, P.H., Muzzi, F., Greenfield, M., Durkan, M., Leong, Y.S., Dong, Y., et al. (2011). Successful establishment of Wolbachia in Aedes populations to suppress dengue transmission. Nature 476, 454-457. Hogg, J.C., and Hurd, H. (1997). The effects of natural Plasmodium falciparum infection on the fecundity and mortality of Anopheles gambiae s. l. in north east Tanzania. Parasitology 114 ( Pt 4), 325-331. Huang, H.R., Chen, Z.J., Kunes, S., Chang, G.D., and Maniatis, T. (2010). Endocytic pathway is required for Drosophila Toll innate immune signaling. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 107, 8322-8327. Imler, J.L. (2014). Overview of Drosophila immunity: a historical perspective. Developmental and comparative immunology 42, 3-15. Ip, Y.T., and Levine, M. (1994). Molecular genetics of Drosophila immunity. Current opinion in genetics & development 4, 672-677. Ip, Y.T., Reach, M., Engstrom, Y., Kadalayil, L., Cai, H., Gonzalez-Crespo, S., Tatei, K., and Levine, M. (1993). Dif, a dorsal-related gene that mediates an immune response in Drosophila. Cell 75, 753-763. Ishii, K.J., Koyama, S., Nakagawa, A., Coban, C., and Akira, S. (2008). Host innate immune receptors and beyond: making sense of microbial infections. Cell host & microbe 3, 352-363. Janeway, C.A., Jr. (1989). Approaching the asymptote? Evolution and revolution in immunology. Cold Spring Harbor symposia on quantitative biology 54 Pt 1, 1-13. Jang, I.H., Chosa, N., Kim, S.H., Nam, H.J., Lemaitre, B., Ochiai, M., Kambris, Z., Brun, S., Hashimoto, C., Ashida, M., et al. (2006). A Spatzleprocessing enzyme required for toll signaling activation in Drosophila innate immunity. Developmental cell 10, 45-55. Jaramillo-Gutierrez, G., Molina-Cruz, A., Kumar, S., and Barillas-Mury, C. (2010). The Anopheles gambiae oxidation resistance 1 (OXR1) gene regulates expression of enzymes that detoxify reactive oxygen species. PloS one 5, e11168. Jaramillo, M., Godbout, M., and Olivier, M. (2005). Hemozoin induces macrophage chemokine expression through oxidative stress-dependent and independent mechanisms. Journal of immunology (Baltimore, Md : 1950) 174, 475-484. 64 Jaramillo, M., Gowda, D.C., Radzioch, D., and Olivier, M. (2003). Hemozoin increases IFN-gamma-inducible macrophage nitric oxide generation through extracellular signal-regulated kinase- and NF-kappa Bdependent pathways. Journal of immunology (Baltimore, Md : 1950) 171, 4243-4253. Jomaa, H., Wiesner, J., Sanderbrand, S., Altincicek, B., Weidemeyer, C., Hintz, M., Turbachova, I., Eberl, M., Zeidler, J., Lichtenthaler, H.K., et al. (1999). Inhibitors of the nonmevalonate pathway of isoprenoid biosynthesis as antimalarial drugs. Science (New York, NY) 285, 1573-1576. Kampfer, P., Matthews, H., Glaeser, S.P., Martin, K., Lodders, N., and Faye, I. (2011). Elizabethkingia anophelis sp. nov., isolated from the midgut of the mosquito Anopheles gambiae. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 61, 2670-2675. Kaneko, T., Goldman, W.E., Mellroth, P., Steiner, H., Fukase, K., Kusumoto, S., Harley, W., Fox, A., Golenbock, D., and Silverman, N. (2004). Monomeric and polymeric gram-negative peptidoglycan but not purified LPS stimulate the Drosophila IMD pathway. Immunity 20, 637-649. Kaneko, T., Golenbock, D., and Silverman, N. (2005). Peptidoglycan recognition by the Drosophila Imd pathway. Journal of endotoxin research 11, 383-389. Kaneko, T., and Silverman, N. (2005). Bacterial recognition and signalling by the Drosophila IMD pathway. Cellular microbiology 7, 461-469. Kang, D., Liu, G., Lundstrom, A., Gelius, E., and Steiner, H. (1998). A peptidoglycan recognition protein in innate immunity conserved from insects to humans. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 95, 10078-10082. Karlsson, J., Oldenvi, S., Fahlander, C., Daenthanasanmak, A., and Steiner, H. (2012). Growing bacteria shed elicitors of Drosophila humoral immunity. Journal of innate immunity 4, 111-116. Kim, K.K., Kim, M.K., Lim, J.H., Park, H.Y., and Lee, S.T. (2005). Transfer of Chryseobacterium meningosepticum and Chryseobacterium miricola to Elizabethkingia gen. nov. as Elizabethkingia meningoseptica comb. nov. and Elizabethkingia miricola comb. nov. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 55, 12871293. Kim, M., Lee, J.H., Lee, S.Y., Kim, E., and Chung, J. (2006). Caspar, a suppressor of antibacterial immunity in Drosophila. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 103, 1635816363. 65 King, E.O. (1959). Studies on a group of previously unclassified bacteria associated with meningitis in infants. American journal of clinical pathology 31, 241-247. Kingsolver, M.B., Huang, Z., and Hardy, R.W. (2013). Insect antiviral innate immunity: pathways, effectors, and connections. Journal of molecular biology 425, 4921-4936. Kistowska, M., Rossy, E., Sansano, S., Gober, H.J., Landmann, R., Mori, L., and De Libero, G. (2008). Dysregulation of the host mevalonate pathway during early bacterial infection activates human TCR gamma delta cells. European journal of immunology 38, 2200-2209. Kleino, A., Myllymaki, H., Kallio, J., Vanha-aho, L.M., Oksanen, K., Ulvila, J., Hultmark, D., Valanne, S., and Ramet, M. (2008). Pirk is a negative regulator of the Drosophila Imd pathway. Journal of immunology (Baltimore, Md : 1950) 180, 5413-5422. Kleino, A., and Silverman, N. (2014). The Drosophila IMD pathway in the activation of the humoral immune response. Developmental and comparative immunology 42, 25-35. Kokoza, V., Ahmed, A., Woon Shin, S., Okafor, N., Zou, Z., and Raikhel, A.S. (2010). Blocking of Plasmodium transmission by cooperative action of Cecropin A and Defensin A in transgenic Aedes aegypti mosquitoes. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 107, 8111-8116. Krieg, A.M., Yi, A.K., Matson, S., Waldschmidt, T.J., Bishop, G.A., Teasdale, R., Koretzky, G.A., and Klinman, D.M. (1995). CpG motifs in bacterial DNA trigger direct B-cell activation. Nature 374, 546-549. Kumar, S., Christophides, G.K., Cantera, R., Charles, B., Han, Y.S., Meister, S., Dimopoulos, G., Kafatos, F.C., and Barillas-Mury, C. (2003). The role of reactive oxygen species on Plasmodium melanotic encapsulation in Anopheles gambiae. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 100, 14139-14144. Kumar, S., Molina-Cruz, A., Gupta, L., Rodrigues, J., and Barillas-Mury, C. (2010). A peroxidase/dual oxidase system modulates midgut epithelial immunity in Anopheles gambiae. Science (New York, NY) 327, 1644-1648. Kunzmann, V., Bauer, E., Feurle, J., Weissinger, F., Tony, H.P., and Wilhelm, M. (2000). Stimulation of gammadelta T cells by aminobisphosphonates and induction of antiplasma cell activity in multiple myeloma. Blood 96, 384-392. 66 Kunzmann, V., Bauer, E., and Wilhelm, M. (1999). Gamma/delta T-cell stimulation by pamidronate. The New England journal of medicine 340, 737-738. Kuraishi, T., Binggeli, O., Opota, O., Buchon, N., and Lemaitre, B. (2011). Genetic evidence for a protective role of the peritrophic matrix against intestinal bacterial infection in Drosophila melanogaster. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 108, 1596615971. Kurata, S. (2014). Peptidoglycan recognition proteins in Drosophila immunity. Developmental and comparative immunology 42, 36-41. Kuzuyama, T., Takagi, M., Takahashi, S., and Seto, H. (2000). Cloning and characterization of 1-deoxy-D-xylulose 5-phosphate synthase from Streptomyces sp. Strain CL190, which uses both the mevalonate and nonmevalonate pathways for isopentenyl diphosphate biosynthesis. Journal of bacteriology 182, 891-897. Labaied, M., Jayabalasingham, B., Bano, N., Cha, S.J., Sandoval, J., Guan, G., and Coppens, I. (2011). Plasmodium salvages cholesterol internalized by LDL and synthesized de novo in the liver. Cellular microbiology 13, 569586. Lagueux, M., Perrodou, E., Levashina, E.A., Capovilla, M., and Hoffmann, J.A. (2000). Constitutive expression of a complement-like protein in toll and JAK gain-of-function mutants of Drosophila. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 97, 11427-11432. Langer, R.C., and Vinetz, J.M. (2001). Plasmodium ookinete-secreted chitinase and parasite penetration of the mosquito peritrophic matrix. Trends in parasitology 17, 269-272. Lanot, R., Zachary, D., Holder, F., and Meister, M. (2001). Postembryonic hematopoiesis in Drosophila. Developmental biology 230, 243-257. Lau, G.W., Goumnerov, B.C., Walendziewicz, C.L., Hewitson, J., Xiao, W., Mahajan-Miklos, S., Tompkins, R.G., Perkins, L.A., and Rahme, L.G. (2003). The Drosophila melanogaster toll pathway participates in resistance to infection by the gram-negative human pathogen Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Infection and immunity 71, 4059-4066. Lavazec, C., and Bourgouin, C. (2008). Mosquito-based transmission blocking vaccines for interrupting Plasmodium development. Microbes and infection / Institut Pasteur 10, 845-849. 67 Lehane, M.J. (1997). Peritrophic matrix structure and function. Annual review of entomology 42, 525-550. Lemaitre, B., and Hoffmann, J. (2007). The host defense of Drosophila melanogaster. Annual Review of Immunology 25, 697-743. Lemaitre, B., Kromer-Metzger, E., Michaut, L., Nicolas, E., Meister, M., Georgel, P., Reichhart, J.M., and Hoffmann, J.A. (1995a). A recessive mutation, immune deficiency (imd), defines two distinct control pathways in the Drosophila host defense. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 92, 9465-9469. Lemaitre, B., Meister, M., Govind, S., Georgel, P., Steward, R., Reichhart, J.M., and Hoffmann, J.A. (1995b). Functional analysis and regulation of nuclear import of dorsal during the immune response in Drosophila. The EMBO journal 14, 536-545. Lemaitre, B., Nicolas, E., Michaut, L., Reichhart, J.M., and Hoffmann, J.A. (1996). The dorsoventral regulatory gene cassette spatzle/Toll/cactus controls the potent antifungal response in Drosophila adults. Cell 86, 973983. Lemaitre, B., Reichhart, J.M., and Hoffmann, J.A. (1997). Drosophila host defense: differential induction of antimicrobial peptide genes after infection by various classes of microorganisms. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 94, 14614-14619. Leone, P., Bischoff, V., Kellenberger, C., Hetru, C., Royet, J., and Roussel, A. (2008). Crystal structure of Drosophila PGRP-SD suggests binding to DAP-type but not lysine-type peptidoglycan. Molecular immunology 45, 2521-2530. Leulier, F., Parquet, C., Pili-Floury, S., Ryu, J.H., Caroff, M., Lee, W.J., Mengin-Lecreulx, D., and Lemaitre, B. (2003). The Drosophila immune system detects bacteria through specific peptidoglycan recognition. Nature immunology 4, 478-484. Leulier, F., Rodriguez, A., Khush, R.S., Abrams, J.M., and Lemaitre, B. (2000). The Drosophila caspase Dredd is required to resist gram-negative bacterial infection. EMBO reports 1, 353-358. Leulier, F., Vidal, S., Saigo, K., Ueda, R., and Lemaitre, B. (2002). Inducible expression of double-stranded RNA reveals a role for dFADD in the regulation of the antibacterial response in Drosophila adults. Current biology : CB 12, 996-1000. 68 Levashina, E.A., Moita, L.F., Blandin, S., Vriend, G., Lagueux, M., and Kafatos, F.C. (2001). Conserved role of a complement-like protein in phagocytosis revealed by dsRNA knockout in cultured cells of the mosquito, Anopheles gambiae. Cell 104, 709-718. Li, H., and Pauza, C.D. (2009). Effects of 15-deoxy-delta12,14prostaglandin J2 (15d-PGJ2) and rosiglitazone on human gammadelta2 T cells. PloS one 4, e7726. Li, M., and Tang, L.H. (2010). [The midgut bacterial flora in lab-reared Anopheles sinensis]. Zhongguo ji sheng chong xue yu ji sheng chong bing za zhi = Chinese journal of parasitology & parasitic diseases 28, 143-147. Li, Y., Kawamura, Y., Fujiwara, N., Naka, T., Liu, H., Huang, X., Kobayashi, K., and Ezaki, T. (2003). Chryseobacterium miricola sp. nov., a novel species isolated from condensation water of space station Mir. Systematic and applied microbiology 26, 523-528. Ligoxygakis, P., Pelte, N., Hoffmann, J.A., and Reichhart, J.M. (2002). Activation of Drosophila Toll during fungal infection by a blood serine protease. Science (New York, NY) 297, 114-116. Lim, J., Gowda, D.C., Krishnegowda, G., and Luckhart, S. (2005). Induction of nitric oxide synthase in Anopheles stephensi by Plasmodium falciparum: mechanism of signaling and the role of parasite glycosylphosphatidylinositols. Infection and immunity 73, 2778-2789. Lindh, J.M., Borg-Karlson, A.K., and Faye, I. (2008). Transstadial and horizontal transfer of bacteria within a colony of Anopheles gambiae (Diptera: Culicidae) and oviposition response to bacteria-containing water. Acta tropica 107, 242-250. Lowenberger, C.A., Kamal, S., Chiles, J., Paskewitz, S., Bulet, P., Hoffmann, J.A., and Christensen, B.M. (1999). Mosquito-Plasmodium interactions in response to immune activation of the vector. Experimental parasitology 91, 59-69. Lu, Z., Serghides, L., Patel, S.N., Degousee, N., Rubin, B.B., Krishnegowda, G., Gowda, D.C., Karin, M., and Kain, K.C. (2006). Disruption of JNK2 decreases the cytokine response to Plasmodium falciparum glycosylphosphatidylinositol in vitro and confers protection in a cerebral malaria model. Journal of immunology (Baltimore, Md : 1950) 177, 63446352. Luckhart, S., Crampton, A.L., Zamora, R., Lieber, M.J., Dos Santos, P.C., Peterson, T.M., Emmith, N., Lim, J., Wink, D.A., and Vodovotz, Y. (2003). Mammalian transforming growth factor beta1 activated after ingestion by 69 Anopheles stephensi modulates mosquito immunity. Infection and immunity 71, 3000-3009. Luckhart, S., and Riehle, M.A. (2007). The insulin signaling cascade from nematodes to mammals: insights into innate immunity of Anopheles mosquitoes to malaria parasite infection. Developmental and comparative immunology 31, 647-656. Luckhart, S., Vodovotz, Y., Cui, L., and Rosenberg, R. (1998). The mosquito Anopheles stephensi limits malaria parasite development with inducible synthesis of nitric oxide. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 95, 5700-5705. Luna, C., Hoa, N.T., Lin, H., Zhang, L., Nguyen, H.L., Kanzok, S.M., and Zheng, L. (2006). Expression of immune responsive genes in cell lines from two different Anopheline species. Insect molecular biology 15, 721-729. Macrae, J.I., and Ferguson, M.A. (2005). A robust and selective method for the quantification of glycosylphosphatidylinositols in biological samples. Glycobiology 15, 131-138. Macrae, J.I., Lopaticki, S., Maier, A.G., Rupasinghe, T., Nahid, A., Cowman, A.F., and McConville, M.J. (2013). Plasmodium falciparum is dependent on de novo myo-inositol biosynthesis for assembly of GPI glycolipids and infectivity. Molecular microbiology. Makki, R., Meister, M., Pennetier, D., Ubeda, J.M., Braun, A., Daburon, V., Krzemien, J., Bourbon, H.M., Zhou, R., Vincent, A., et al. (2010). A short receptor downregulates JAK/STAT signalling to control the Drosophila cellular immune response. PLoS biology 8, e1000441. Manfruelli, P., Reichhart, J.M., Steward, R., Hoffmann, J.A., and Lemaitre, B. (1999). A mosaic analysis in Drosophila fat body cells of the control of antimicrobial peptide genes by the Rel proteins Dorsal and DIF. The EMBO journal 18, 3380-3391. Marois, E. (2011). The multifaceted mosquito anti-Plasmodium response. Current opinion in microbiology 14, 429-435. Mattarollo, S.R., Kenna, T., Nieda, M., and Nicol, A.J. (2007). Chemotherapy and zoledronate sensitize solid tumour cells to Vgamma9Vdelta2 T cell cytotoxicity. Cancer immunology, immunotherapy : CII 56, 1285-1297. Matyi, S.A., Hoyt, P.R., Hosoyama, A., Yamazoe, A., Fujita, N., and Gustafson, J.E. (2013). Draft Genome Sequences of Elizabethkingia meningoseptica. Genome announcements 1. 70 Medzhitov, R. (2007). Recognition of microorganisms and activation of the immune response. Nature 449, 819-826. Medzhitov, R., Preston-Hurlburt, P., and Janeway, C.A., Jr. (1997). A human homologue of the Drosophila Toll protein signals activation of adaptive immunity. Nature 388, 394-397. Meinander, A., Runchel, C., Tenev, T., Chen, L., Kim, C.H., Ribeiro, P.S., Broemer, M., Leulier, F., Zvelebil, M., Silverman, N., et al. (2012). Ubiquitylation of the initiator caspase DREDD is required for innate immune signalling. The EMBO journal 31, 2770-2783. Meister, S., Agianian, B., Turlure, F., Relogio, A., Morlais, I., Kafatos, F.C., and Christophides, G.K. (2009). Anopheles gambiae PGRPLC-mediated defense against bacteria modulates infections with malaria parasites. PLoS pathogens 5, e1000542. Meister, S., Kanzok, S.M., Zheng, X.L., Luna, C., Li, T.R., Hoa, N.T., Clayton, J.R., White, K.P., Kafatos, F.C., Christophides, G.K., et al. (2005). Immune signaling pathways regulating bacterial and malaria parasite infection of the mosquito Anopheles gambiae. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 102, 11420-11425. Mellroth, P., Karlsson, J., Hakansson, J., Schultz, N., Goldman, W.E., and Steiner, H. (2005). Ligand-induced dimerization of Drosophila peptidoglycan recognition proteins in vitro. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 102, 6455-6460. Mellroth, P., Karlsson, J., and Steiner, H. (2003). A scavenger function for a Drosophila peptidoglycan recognition protein. The Journal of biological chemistry 278, 7059-7064. Mellroth, P., and Steiner, H. (2006). PGRP-SB1: an N-acetylmuramoyl Lalanine amidase with antibacterial activity. Biochemical and biophysical research communications 350, 994-999. Menge, D.M., Zhong, D., Guda, T., Gouagna, L., Githure, J., Beier, J., and Yan, G. (2006). Quantitative trait loci controlling refractoriness to Plasmodium falciparum in natural Anopheles gambiae mosquitoes from a malaria-endemic region in western Kenya. Genetics 173, 235-241. Merzendorfer, H., and Zimoch, L. (2003). Chitin metabolism in insects: structure, function and regulation of chitin synthases and chitinases. The Journal of experimental biology 206, 4393-4412. 71 Michel, T., Reichhart, J.M., Hoffmann, J.A., and Royet, J. (2001). Drosophila Toll is activated by Gram-positive bacteria through a circulating peptidoglycan recognition protein. Nature 414, 756-759. Mitri, C., Jacques, J.C., Thiery, I., Riehle, M.M., Xu, J., Bischoff, E., Morlais, I., Nsango, S.E., Vernick, K.D., and Bourgouin, C. (2009). Fine pathogen discrimination within the APL1 gene family protects Anopheles gambiae against human and rodent malaria species. PLoS pathogens 5, e1000576. Molina-Cruz, A., DeJong, R.J., Charles, B., Gupta, L., Kumar, S., JaramilloGutierrez, G., and Barillas-Mury, C. (2008). Reactive oxygen species modulate Anopheles gambiae immunity against bacteria and Plasmodium. The Journal of biological chemistry 283, 3217-3223. Mookerjee-Basu, J., Vantourout, P., Martinez, L.O., Perret, B., Collet, X., Perigaud, C., Peyrottes, S., and Champagne, E. (2010). F1-adenosine triphosphatase displays properties characteristic of an antigen presentation molecule for Vgamma9Vdelta2 T cells. Journal of immunology (Baltimore, Md : 1950) 184, 6920-6928. Moreira, C.K., Marrelli, M.T., and Jacobs-Lorena, M. (2004). Gene expression in Plasmodium: from gametocytes to sporozoites. International journal for parasitology 34, 1431-1440. Moreira, L.A., Iturbe-Ormaetxe, I., Jeffery, J.A., Lu, G., Pyke, A.T., Hedges, L.M., Rocha, B.C., Hall-Mendelin, S., Day, A., Riegler, M., et al. (2009). A Wolbachia symbiont in Aedes aegypti limits infection with dengue, Chikungunya, and Plasmodium. Cell 139, 1268-1278. Morita, C.T., Jin, C., Sarikonda, G., and Wang, H. (2007). Nonpeptide antigens, presentation mechanisms, and immunological memory of human Vgamma2Vdelta2 T cells: discriminating friend from foe through the recognition of prenyl pyrophosphate antigens. Immunological reviews 215, 59-76. Morita, C.T., Lee, H.K., Wang, H., Li, H., Mariuzza, R.A., and Tanaka, Y. (2001). Structural features of nonpeptide prenyl pyrophosphates that determine their antigenicity for human gamma delta T cells. Journal of immunology (Baltimore, Md : 1950) 167, 36-41. Moser, B., and Eberl, M. (2007). gammadelta T cells: novel initiators of adaptive immunity. Immunological reviews 215, 89-102. Murray, C.J., Rosenfeld, L.C., Lim, S.S., Andrews, K.G., Foreman, K.J., Haring, D., Fullman, N., Naghavi, M., Lozano, R., and Lopez, A.D. (2012). 72 Global malaria mortality between 1980 and 2010: a systematic analysis. Lancet 379, 413-431. Neyen, C., Poidevin, M., Roussel, A., and Lemaitre, B. (2012). Tissue- and ligand-specific sensing of gram-negative infection in drosophila by PGRPLC isoforms and PGRP-LE. Journal of immunology (Baltimore, Md : 1950) 189, 1886-1897. Ngwa, C.J., Glockner, V., Abdelmohsen, U.R., Scheuermayer, M., Fischer, R., Hentschel, U., and Pradel, G. (2013). 16S rRNA gene-based identification of Elizabethkingia meningoseptica (Flavobacteriales: Flavobacteriaceae) as a dominant midgut bacterium of the Asian malaria vector Anopheles stephensi (Dipteria: Culicidae) with antimicrobial activities. Journal of medical entomology 50, 404-414. Niare, O., Markianos, K., Volz, J., Oduol, F., Toure, A., Bagayoko, M., Sangare, D., Traore, S.F., Wang, R., Blass, C., et al. (2002). Genetic loci affecting resistance to human malaria parasites in a West African mosquito vector population. Science (New York, NY) 298, 213-216. Obbard, D.J., Callister, D.M., Jiggins, F.M., Soares, D.C., Yan, G., and Little, T.J. (2008). The evolution of TEP1, an exceptionally polymorphic immunity gene in Anopheles gambiae. BMC evolutionary biology 8, 274. Ochiai, M., and Ashida, M. (2000). A pattern-recognition protein for beta1,3-glucan. The binding domain and the cDNA cloning of beta-1,3-glucan recognition protein from the silkworm, Bombyx mori. The Journal of biological chemistry 275, 4995-5002. Oliveira Gde, A., Lieberman, J., and Barillas-Mury, C. (2012). Epithelial nitration by a peroxidase/NOX5 system mediates mosquito antiplasmodial immunity. Science (New York, NY) 335, 856-859. Oliveira, J.H., Goncalves, R.L., Lara, F.A., Dias, F.A., Gandara, A.C., Menna-Barreto, R.F., Edwards, M.C., Laurindo, F.R., Silva-Neto, M.A., Sorgine, M.H., et al. (2011). Blood meal-derived heme decreases ROS levels in the midgut of Aedes aegypti and allows proliferation of intestinal microbiota. PLoS pathogens 7, e1001320. Osei-Poku, J., Mbogo, C.M., Palmer, W.J., and Jiggins, F.M. (2012). Deep sequencing reveals extensive variation in the gut microbiota of wild mosquitoes from Kenya. Molecular ecology 21, 5138-5150. Osta, M.A., Christophides, G.K., and Kafatos, F.C. (2004). Effects of mosquito genes on Plasmodium development. Science (New York, NY) 303, 2030-2032. 73 Pakpour, N., Camp, L., Smithers, H.M., Wang, B., Tu, Z., Nadler, S.A., and Luckhart, S. (2013). Protein kinase C-dependent signaling controls the midgut epithelial barrier to malaria parasite infection in anopheline mosquitoes. PloS one 8, e76535. Pan, X., Zhou, G., Wu, J., Bian, G., Lu, P., Raikhel, A.S., and Xi, Z. (2012). Wolbachia induces reactive oxygen species (ROS)-dependent activation of the Toll pathway to control dengue virus in the mosquito Aedes aegypti. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 109, E23-31. Paquette, N., Broemer, M., Aggarwal, K., Chen, L., Husson, M., ErturkHasdemir, D., Reichhart, J.M., Meier, P., and Silverman, N. (2010). Caspase-mediated cleavage, IAP binding, and ubiquitination: linking three mechanisms crucial for Drosophila NF-kappaB signaling. Molecular cell 37, 172-182. Paredes, J.C., Welchman, D.P., Poidevin, M., and Lemaitre, B. (2011). Negative regulation by amidase PGRPs shapes the Drosophila antibacterial response and protects the fly from innocuous infection. Immunity 35, 770779. Park, J.W., Kim, C.H., Kim, J.H., Je, B.R., Roh, K.B., Kim, S.J., Lee, H.H., Ryu, J.H., Lim, J.H., Oh, B.H., et al. (2007). Clustering of peptidoglycan recognition protein-SA is required for sensing lysine-type peptidoglycan in insects. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 104, 6602-6607. Persson, C., Oldenvi, S., and Steiner, H. (2007). Peptidoglycan recognition protein LF: a negative regulator of Drosophila immunity. Insect biochemistry and molecular biology 37, 1309-1316. Poltorak, A., Smirnova, I., He, X., Liu, M.Y., Van Huffel, C., McNally, O., Birdwell, D., Alejos, E., Silva, M., Du, X., et al. (1998). Genetic and physical mapping of the Lps locus: identification of the toll-4 receptor as a candidate gene in the critical region. Blood cells, molecules & diseases 24, 340-355. Povelones, M., Bhagavatula, L., Yassine, H., Tan, L.A., Upton, L.M., Osta, M.A., and Christophides, G.K. (2013). The CLIP-domain serine protease homolog SPCLIP1 regulates complement recruitment to microbial surfaces in the malaria mosquito Anopheles gambiae. PLoS pathogens 9, e1003623. Povelones, M., Upton, L.M., Sala, K.A., and Christophides, G.K. (2011). Structure-function analysis of the Anopheles gambiae LRIM1/APL1C complex and its interaction with complement C3-like protein TEP1. PLoS pathogens 7, e1002023. 74 Povelones, M., Waterhouse, R.M., Kafatos, F.C., and Christophides, G.K. (2009). Leucine-rich repeat protein complex activates mosquito complement in defense against Plasmodium parasites. Science (New York, NY) 324, 258261. Pumpuni, C.B., Demaio, J., Kent, M., Davis, J.R., and Beier, J.C. (1996). Bacterial population dynamics in three anopheline species: the impact on Plasmodium sporogonic development. The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene 54, 214-218. Ramet, M., Manfruelli, P., Pearson, A., Mathey-Prevot, B., and Ezekowitz, R.A. (2002). Functional genomic analysis of phagocytosis and identification of a Drosophila receptor for E. coli. Nature 416, 644-648. Reichhart, J.M., Georgel, P., Meister, M., Lemaitre, B., Kappler, C., and Hoffmann, J.A. (1993). Expression and nuclear translocation of the rel/NFkappa B-related morphogen dorsal during the immune response of Drosophila. Comptes rendus de l'Academie des sciences Serie III, Sciences de la vie 316, 1218-1224. Riehle, M.M., Markianos, K., Lambrechts, L., Xia, A., Sharakhov, I., Koella, J.C., and Vernick, K.D. (2007). A major genetic locus controlling natural Plasmodium falciparum infection is shared by East and West African Anopheles gambiae. Malaria journal 6, 87. Riehle, M.M., Markianos, K., Niare, O., Xu, J., Li, J., Toure, A.M., Podiougou, B., Oduol, F., Diawara, S., Diallo, M., et al. (2006). Natural malaria infection in Anopheles gambiae is regulated by a single genomic control region. Science (New York, NY) 312, 577-579. Riehle, M.M., Xu, J., Lazzaro, B.P., Rottschaefer, S.M., Coulibaly, B., Sacko, M., Niare, O., Morlais, I., Traore, S.F., and Vernick, K.D. (2008). Anopheles gambiae APL1 is a family of variable LRR proteins required for Rel1-mediated protection from the malaria parasite, Plasmodium berghei. PloS one 3, e3672. Rohmer, M. (1999). The discovery of a mevalonate-independent pathway for isoprenoid biosynthesis in bacteria, algae and higher plants. Natural product reports 16, 565-574. Rottschaefer, S.M., Riehle, M.M., Coulibaly, B., Sacko, M., Niare, O., Morlais, I., Traore, S.F., Vernick, K.D., and Lazzaro, B.P. (2011). Exceptional diversity, maintenance of polymorphism, and recent directional selection on the APL1 malaria resistance genes of Anopheles gambiae. PLoS biology 9, e1000600. 75 Rutschmann, S., Jung, A.C., Hetru, C., Reichhart, J.M., Hoffmann, J.A., and Ferrandon, D. (2000). The Rel protein DIF mediates the antifungal but not the antibacterial host defense in Drosophila. Immunity 12, 569-580. Schleifer, K.H., and Kandler, O. (1972). Peptidoglycan types of bacterial cell walls and their taxonomic implications. Bacteriological reviews 36, 407-477. Schmidt, R.L., Trejo, T.R., Plummer, T.B., Platt, J.L., and Tang, A.H. (2008). Infection-induced proteolysis of PGRP-LC controls the IMD activation and melanization cascades in Drosophila. FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology 22, 918-929. Schnitger, A.K., Kafatos, F.C., and Osta, M.A. (2007). The melanization reaction is not required for survival of Anopheles gambiae mosquitoes after bacterial infections. The Journal of biological chemistry 282, 21884-21888. Schwandner, R., Dziarski, R., Wesche, H., Rothe, M., and Kirschning, C.J. (1999). Peptidoglycan- and lipoteichoic acid-induced cell activation is mediated by toll-like receptor 2. The Journal of biological chemistry 274, 17406-17409. Sen, R., and Baltimore, D. (1986). Multiple nuclear factors interact with the immunoglobulin enhancer sequences. Cell 46, 705-716. Service, M.W. (1993). Mosquitoes (Culicidae). In: Medical Insects and Arachnids. R.P. Lane, R.W. Crosskey, ed., (Chapman & Hall), pp. 120-140. Shahabuddin, M., Fields, I., Bulet, P., Hoffmann, J.A., and Miller, L.H. (1998). Plasmodium gallinaceum: differential killing of some mosquito stages of the parasite by insect defensin. Experimental parasitology 89, 103112. Silverman, N., Zhou, R., Stoven, S., Pandey, N., Hultmark, D., and Maniatis, T. (2000). A Drosophila IkappaB kinase complex required for Relish cleavage and antibacterial immunity. Genes & development 14, 2461-2471. Souza-Neto, J.A., Sim, S., and Dimopoulos, G. (2009). An evolutionary conserved function of the JAK-STAT pathway in anti-dengue defense. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 106, 17841-17846. Steiner, H., Hultmark, D., Engstrom, A., Bennich, H., and Boman, H.G. (1981). Sequence and specificity of two antibacterial proteins involved in insect immunity. Nature 292, 246-248. 76 Stenbak, C.R., Ryu, J.H., Leulier, F., Pili-Floury, S., Parquet, C., Herve, M., Chaput, C., Boneca, I.G., Lee, W.J., Lemaitre, B., et al. (2004). Peptidoglycan molecular requirements allowing detection by the Drosophila immune deficiency pathway. Journal of immunology (Baltimore, Md : 1950) 173, 7339-7348. Stoven, S., Ando, I., Kadalayil, L., Engstrom, Y., and Hultmark, D. (2000). Activation of the Drosophila NF-kappaB factor Relish by rapid endoproteolytic cleavage. EMBO reports 1, 347-352. Stoven, S., Silverman, N., Junell, A., Hedengren-Olcott, M., Erturk, D., Engstrom, Y., Maniatis, T., and Hultmark, D. (2003). Caspase-mediated processing of the Drosophila NF-kappaB factor Relish. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 100, 59915996. Sun, H., Bristow, B.N., Qu, G., and Wasserman, S.A. (2002). A heterotrimeric death domain complex in Toll signaling. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 99, 1287112876. Sun, S.C., Asling, B., and Faye, I. (1991a). Organization and expression of the immunoresponsive lysozyme gene in the giant silk moth, Hyalophora cecropia. The Journal of biological chemistry 266, 6644-6649. Sun, S.C., and Faye, I. (1992). Cecropia immunoresponsive factor, an insect immunoresponsive factor with DNA-binding properties similar to nuclearfactor kappa B. European journal of biochemistry / FEBS 204, 885-892. Sun, S.C., Lindstrom, I., Lee, J.Y., and Faye, I. (1991b). Structure and expression of the attacin genes in Hyalophora cecropia. European journal of biochemistry / FEBS 196, 247-254. Surachetpong, W., Singh, N., Cheung, K.W., and Luckhart, S. (2009). MAPK ERK signaling regulates the TGF-beta1-dependent mosquito response to Plasmodium falciparum. PLoS pathogens 5, e1000366. Takehana, A., Katsuyama, T., Yano, T., Oshima, Y., Takada, H., Aigaki, T., and Kurata, S. (2002). Overexpression of a pattern-recognition receptor, peptidoglycan-recognition protein-LE, activates imd/relish-mediated antibacterial defense and the prophenoloxidase cascade in Drosophila larvae. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 99, 13705-13710. Takehana, A., Yano, T., Mita, S., Kotani, A., Oshima, Y., and Kurata, S. (2004). Peptidoglycan recognition protein (PGRP)-LE and PGRP-LC act synergistically in Drosophila immunity. The EMBO journal 23, 4690-4700. 77 Tanaka, Y., Morita, C.T., Tanaka, Y., Nieves, E., Brenner, M.B., and Bloom, B.R. (1995). Natural and synthetic non-peptide antigens recognized by human gamma delta T cells. Nature 375, 155-158. Tanji, T., Yun, E.Y., and Ip, Y.T. (2010). Heterodimers of NF-kappaB transcription factors DIF and Relish regulate antimicrobial peptide genes in Drosophila. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 107, 14715-14720. Teo, J., Tan, S.Y., Tay, M., Ding, Y., Kjelleberg, S., Givskov, M., Lin, R.T., and Yang, L. (2013). First case of E anophelis outbreak in an intensive-care unit. Lancet 382, 855-856. Terenius, O., Lindh, J.M., Eriksson-Gonzales, K., Bussiere, L., Laugen, A.T., Bergquist, H., Titanji, K., and Faye, I. (2012). Midgut bacterial dynamics in Aedes aegypti. FEMS microbiology ecology 80, 556-565. Towb, P., Bergmann, A., and Wasserman, S.A. (2001). The protein kinase Pelle mediates feedback regulation in the Drosophila Toll signaling pathway. Development (Cambridge, England) 128, 4729-4736. Tzou, P., Ohresser, S., Ferrandon, D., Capovilla, M., Reichhart, J.M., Lemaitre, B., Hoffmann, J.A., and Imler, J.L. (2000). Tissue-specific inducible expression of antimicrobial peptide genes in Drosophila surface epithelia. Immunity 13, 737-748. Valanne, S., Myllymaki, H., Kallio, J., Schmid, M.R., Kleino, A., Murumagi, A., Airaksinen, L., Kotipelto, T., Kaustio, M., Ulvila, J., et al. (2010). Genome-wide RNA interference in Drosophila cells identifies G protein-coupled receptor kinase 2 as a conserved regulator of NF-kappaB signaling. Journal of immunology (Baltimore, Md : 1950) 184, 6188-6198. Vizioli, J., Bulet, P., Charlet, M., Lowenberger, C., Blass, C., Muller, H.M., Dimopoulos, G., Hoffmann, J., Kafatos, F.C., and Richman, A. (2000). Cloning and analysis of a cecropin gene from the malaria vector mosquito, Anopheles gambiae. Insect molecular biology 9, 75-84. Vizioli, J., Bulet, P., Hoffmann, J.A., Kafatos, F.C., Muller, H.M., and Dimopoulos, G. (2001a). Gambicin: a novel immune responsive antimicrobial peptide from the malaria vector Anopheles gambiae. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 98, 12630-12635. Vizioli, J., Richman, A.M., Uttenweiler-Joseph, S., Blass, C., and Bulet, P. (2001b). The defensin peptide of the malaria vector mosquito Anopheles gambiae: antimicrobial activities and expression in adult mosquitoes. Insect biochemistry and molecular biology 31, 241-248. 78 Wang, L., Gilbert, R.J., Atilano, M.L., Filipe, S.R., Gay, N.J., and Ligoxygakis, P. (2008). Peptidoglycan recognition protein-SD provides versatility of receptor formation in Drosophila immunity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 105, 1188111886. Wang, L., Kounatidis, I., and Ligoxygakis, P. (2014). as a model to study the role of blood cells in inflammation, innate immunity and cancer. Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology 3, 113. Wang, L., Weber, A.N., Atilano, M.L., Filipe, S.R., Gay, N.J., and Ligoxygakis, P. (2006). Sensing of Gram-positive bacteria in Drosophila: GNBP1 is needed to process and present peptidoglycan to PGRP-SA. The EMBO journal 25, 5005-5014. Wang, S., Ghosh, A.K., Bongio, N., Stebbings, K.A., Lampe, D.J., and Jacobs-Lorena, M. (2012). Fighting malaria with engineered symbiotic bacteria from vector mosquitoes. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 109, 12734-12739. Wang, Y., Gilbreath, T.M., 3rd, Kukutla, P., Yan, G., and Xu, J. (2011). Dynamic gut microbiome across life history of the malaria mosquito Anopheles gambiae in Kenya. PloS one 6, e24767. Warr, E., Das, S., Dong, Y., and Dimopoulos, G. (2008). The Gram-negative bacteria-binding protein gene family: its role in the innate immune system of anopheles gambiae and in anti-Plasmodium defence. Insect molecular biology 17, 39-51. Warr, E., Lambrechts, L., Koella, J.C., Bourgouin, C., and Dimopoulos, G. (2006). Anopheles gambiae immune responses to Sephadex beads: involvement of anti-Plasmodium factors in regulating melanization. Insect biochemistry and molecular biology 36, 769-778. Waterhouse, R.M., Kriventseva, E.V., Meister, S., Xi, Z., Alvarez, K.S., Bartholomay, L.C., Barillas-Mury, C., Bian, G., Blandin, S., Christensen, B.M., et al. (2007). Evolutionary dynamics of immune-related genes and pathways in disease-vector mosquitoes. Science (New York, NY) 316, 17381743. Wei, H., Huang, D., Lai, X., Chen, M., Zhong, W., Wang, R., and Chen, Z.W. (2008). Definition of APC presentation of phosphoantigen (E)-4hydroxy-3-methyl-but-2-enyl pyrophosphate to Vgamma2Vdelta 2 TCR. Journal of immunology (Baltimore, Md : 1950) 181, 4798-4806. Werner, T., Borge-Renberg, K., Mellroth, P., Steiner, H., and Hultmark, D. (2003). Functional diversity of the Drosophila PGRP-LC gene cluster in the 79 response to lipopolysaccharide and peptidoglycan. The Journal of biological chemistry 278, 26319-26322. Werner, T., Liu, G., Kang, D., Ekengren, S., Steiner, H., and Hultmark, D. (2000). A family of peptidoglycan recognition proteins in the fruit fly Drosophila melanogaster. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 97, 13772-13777. WHO (2013). World Malaria Report; WHO website available. http://www.who.int/malaria/publications/world_malaria_report_2013/en/. Accessed: March 5 2014. Wu, L.P., and Anderson, K.V. (1998). Regulated nuclear import of Rel proteins in the Drosophila immune response. Nature 392, 93-97. Yano, T., Mita, S., Ohmori, H., Oshima, Y., Fujimoto, Y., Ueda, R., Takada, H., Goldman, W.E., Fukase, K., Silverman, N., et al. (2008). Autophagic control of listeria through intracellular innate immune recognition in drosophila. Nature immunology 9, 908-916. Yeh, E., and DeRisi, J.L. (2011). Chemical rescue of malaria parasites lacking an apicoplast defines organelle function in blood-stage Plasmodium falciparum. PLoS biology 9, e1001138. Yoshida, H., Kinoshita, K., and Ashida, M. (1996). Purification of a peptidoglycan recognition protein from hemolymph of the silkworm, Bombyx mori. The Journal of biological chemistry 271, 13854-13860. Zaidman-Remy, A., Herve, M., Poidevin, M., Pili-Floury, S., Kim, M.S., Blanot, D., Oh, B.H., Ueda, R., Mengin-Lecreulx, D., and Lemaitre, B. (2006). The Drosophila amidase PGRP-LB modulates the immune response to bacterial infection. Immunity 24, 463-473. Zaidman-Remy, A., Poidevin, M., Herve, M., Welchman, D.P., Paredes, J.C., Fahlander, C., Steiner, H., Mengin-Lecreulx, D., and Lemaitre, B. (2011). Drosophila immunity: analysis of PGRP-SB1 expression, enzymatic activity and function. PloS one 6, e17231. Zheng, L., Cornel, A.J., Wang, R., Erfle, H., Voss, H., Ansorge, W., Kafatos, F.C., and Collins, F.H. (1997). Quantitative trait loci for refractoriness of Anopheles gambiae to Plasmodium cynomolgi B. Science (New York, NY) 276, 425-428. Zheng, L., Wang, S., Romans, P., Zhao, H., Luna, C., and Benedict, M.Q. (2003). Quantitative trait loci in Anopheles gambiae controlling the encapsulation response against Plasmodium cynomolgi Ceylon. BMC genetics 4, 16. 80 Zhu, J., Krishnegowda, G., and Gowda, D.C. (2005). Induction of proinflammatory responses in macrophages by the glycosylphosphatidylinositols of Plasmodium falciparum: the requirement of extracellular signal-regulated kinase, p38, c-Jun N-terminal kinase and NFkappaB pathways for the expression of proinflammatory cytokines and nitric oxide. The Journal of biological chemistry 280, 8617-8627. Zhu, J., Krishnegowda, G., Li, G., and Gowda, D.C. (2011). Proinflammatory responses by glycosylphosphatidylinositols (GPIs) of Plasmodium falciparum are mainly mediated through the recognition of TLR2/TLR1. Experimental parasitology 128, 205-211. 81