Download QM_2_particles_ver2

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts

Tight binding wikipedia , lookup

Orchestrated objective reduction wikipedia , lookup

Measurement in quantum mechanics wikipedia , lookup

Probability amplitude wikipedia , lookup

Aharonov–Bohm effect wikipedia , lookup

Ensemble interpretation wikipedia , lookup

Quantum group wikipedia , lookup

Renormalization group wikipedia , lookup

Path integral formulation wikipedia , lookup

Niels Bohr wikipedia , lookup

Quantum entanglement wikipedia , lookup

Quantum key distribution wikipedia , lookup

Elementary particle wikipedia , lookup

Identical particles wikipedia , lookup

Spin (physics) wikipedia , lookup

Bell's theorem wikipedia , lookup

Max Born wikipedia , lookup

Coherent states wikipedia , lookup

Wave function wikipedia , lookup

Renormalization wikipedia , lookup

Quantum teleportation wikipedia , lookup

Quantum electrodynamics wikipedia , lookup

Interpretations of quantum mechanics wikipedia , lookup

History of quantum field theory wikipedia , lookup

Electron scattering wikipedia , lookup

Double-slit experiment wikipedia , lookup

Electron configuration wikipedia , lookup

Atomic orbital wikipedia , lookup

Quantum state wikipedia , lookup

EPR paradox wikipedia , lookup

T-symmetry wikipedia , lookup

Relativistic quantum mechanics wikipedia , lookup

Copenhagen interpretation wikipedia , lookup

Hidden variable theory wikipedia , lookup

Canonical quantization wikipedia , lookup

Symmetry in quantum mechanics wikipedia , lookup

Particle in a box wikipedia , lookup

Atomic theory wikipedia , lookup

Hydrogen atom wikipedia , lookup

Wave–particle duality wikipedia , lookup

Matter wave wikipedia , lookup

Bohr–Einstein debates wikipedia , lookup

Bohr model wikipedia , lookup

Theoretical and experimental justification for the Schrödinger equation wikipedia , lookup

Transcript
1
Quantum Mechanics:
Wave Theory of Particles
Dr. Bill Pezzaglia
QM Part 2
Updated: 2010May11
2
Quantum Mechanics
A. Bohr Model of Atom
B. Wave Nature of Particles
C. Schrodinger Wave Equation
3
A. Bohr Model of Atom
1. Bohr’s First Postulate
•
•
•
Electron orbits are quantized by
angular momentum
Orbits are stable, and contrary to
classical physics, do not
continuously radiate
Principle Quantum number “n”
(an integer whose lowest value is
n=1)
Niels Bohr
1885-1962
1922 Nobel Prize
4
1. Bohr’s First Postulate
(a) Quantized Angular Momentum
•
•
1912 first ideas by J.W. Nicholson
Postulates angular momentum of electron in
atom must be a multiple of
h

L  mvr  n
2
5
1. Bohr’s First Postulate
(b) Stationary Orbits
•
Classical physics says accelerating charges
(i.e. electrons in circular orbits) should radiate
energy away, hence orbits decay.
•
Bohr says orbits are stable and do not radiate
•
Principle quantum number “n” has a lowest
value of n=1 (lowest angular momentum of one
h-bar).
(c) The Bohr Radius
•
•
•
•
2
Classical equation of motion
Substitute:
Solve for radius:
Bohr Radius:
v
( Ze)e
m 
2
r 40 r
L
n
v

mr mr
a0
rn  n
Z
2
h 0
a0 
 0.053 nm
2
me
2
6
7
2. Bohr’s Second Postulate
(a) The sudden transition of the electron
between two stationary states will produce
an emission (or absorption) of radiation
(photon) of frequency given by the
Einstein/Planck formula
hf  Ei  E f
8
(b) Energy of nth orbit
•
Viral Theorem: For
inverse square law force:
•
Hence total energy:
•
KE   12 PE
E  KE  PE  12 PE
Use Electrostatic energy
formula, we get:
2
Ze
E
80 r
(b) Energy of nth orbit
•
Substitute Bohr’s radius formula for n-th
orbit gives energy of nth orbit:
2
2
Z hcR
Z
En  
 (13.6 ev) 2
2
n
n
•
Where he can calculate Rydberg’s
constant from scratch!
2
4
e
me
R
 3 2
80 hca0 8h  0 c
9
(c) Bohr Derives Balmer’s Formula
•
From Einstein-Planck Formula:
hf 
•
hc

 Ei  E f
Substituting his energy formula (and
divide out factor of hc), he derives
Balmer’s formula!
1
1 
 Z R 2  2 

n f 
 ni
1
2
10
11
3. Bohr’s Correspondence Principle
•
1923: Classical mechanics “corresponds” to
quantum system for BIG quantum numbers.
•
When “n” is big, it behaves classically
•
When “n” is small, it behaves “quantumly” (is
that a word?)
12
B. Wave Nature of Particles
1. deBroglie Waves
2. Particle in a Box
3. Heisenberg Uncertainty
1. deBroglie Waves (1924)
a)
Suggest particles have wavelike
properties following same rules as
photon.
Ehf
h
P

•
Proof: 1927 Electron diffraction
experiment of Davisson & Germer
(Nobel Prize 1937)
13
(b) deBroglie’s Bohr Model
•
Bohr’s model had an ad-hoc
assumption that orbits had quantized
angular momentum (multiples of h-bar)
•
deBroglie postulates that only
“standing waves” can yield stationary
orbits, i.e. circumference must be
multiple of the wavelength
•
•
n  2 r
h
nh
p 
Hence allowed momentums are:
 2 r
h
Or angular momentums must
L  rp  n
be quantized:
2
14
1c. Phase Velocity
•
Velocity of waves are FASTER than light
 E  h 
v  f    
 h  p 
E mc 2 c 2
 

p
mv
v
Where “v” is the
classical speed of the
particle (aka “group
velocity”)
15
(d) Interpretation
•
deBroglie thought that the “wave” of a
particle had two aspects.
•
The “group velocity” described the
localized “particle” nature of the
classical particle
•
The “phase velocity” was associated
with the “pilot wave” which traveled
ahead and behind the particle (faster
than light), sensing the environment.
16
2. Particle in a Box
a)
•
Standing wave patterns
Analogous to waves on
a string with fixed ends.
2L
n 
n
•
Momentum hence is
quantized to values:
h
nh
pn  
 2L
17
18
2. Particle in a Box
(b) Energy is hence quantized to
values:
2
2
2
p
nh
En 
 2
2m 8 L m
•
The particle can never have zero
energy! The lowest is n=1
•
The smaller the box, the bigger the
energy. If wall is height “z”, for
small enough “L”, the particle will
jump and escape!
2
h
 mgz
2
8L m
2c. Wavepackets & Localization
•
A wave is infinite in extent, so the “electron” is not localized.
•
The superposition of waves of slightly different wavelengths will
create a “localized” wavepacket, which roughly corresponds to
classical particle
•
But now it does not have a single momentum (wavelength); it has
a spread of momenta, and the packet will tend to spread out with
time.
19
3a. Heisenberg QM
•
1925 First formulation of “quantum
mechanics” which correctly describes
energy levels and quantum jumps.
•
It’s a mathematical theory, which assumes
that position and momentum do not
commute:
ih
xp  px 
2
20
3b. Heisenberg Uncertainty
•
•
“principle of indeterminacy”
“The more precisely the
position is determined, the
less precisely the momentum
is known in this instant, and
vice versa.”
•
1927 Uncertainty Principle (which can
be derived from [x,p]=ih …)
h
x p 
4
21
22
C. Wave Mechanics
1. More Quantum Numbers
2. Pauli Exclusion Principle
3. Schrodinger Wave Mechanics
1. Zeeman Effect (1894)
(a) Zeeman effect: splitting of spectral
lines due to magnetic fields, shows us
sunspots have BIG magnetic fields
23
24
1b. Bohr Sommerfeld Model
1916 use elliptical orbits to different energies (new
quantum number “l”).
Also, quantum
number “m” to
describe orientation,
where if l=2, m
could be
{-2,-1,0,1,2}
1c. Bohr’s Periodic Table
1921 uses quantum numbers to explain periodic
table (Pauli’s contribution is that each state has 2
electrons in it, another quantum number)
25
2. Pauli Spin
•
1924 proposes new quantum number to
explain “Anomalous Zeeman Effect”
where “s” orbits split into 2 lines.
•
1925 Uhlenbeck & Goudsmit identify
this as description of “spin” of electron,
which creates a small magnetic moment
•
1927 Pauli introduces idea of “spinors”
which describe spin half electrons
•
Famous quote: when reviewing a very badly written
paper he criticized it as “It is not even wrong”
26
2b. Pauli Exclusion Principle (1925)
•
Serious Question: Why don’t all the
electrons fall down into the first (n=1) Bohr
orbit?
•
If they did, we would not have the periodic
table of elements!
•
Exclusion Principle: Each quantum state
can only have one electron (e.g. 1s orbit
can have two electrons, one with spin up,
other with spin down)
27
2c. Fermions & Bosons
•
Fermions, which have spin ½ (angular
momentum of h/4) obey the Pauli
exclusion principle (e.g. electrons,
neutrinos, protons, neutrons, quarks)
•
Bosons, which have integer spin, do NOT
obey the principle (e.g. photons, gravitons).
•
This is why we can have “laser” light (a
bunch of photons with their waves all in
phase).
28
3. Schrodinger 1926
Bohr & Heisenberg’s quantum mechanics
used abstract mathematical operations
(e.g. x and p don’t commute)
a) Schrodinger writes a generalized
equation that deBroglie waves must
obey when there is Potential Energy
(such that the wavelength changes from
point to point in space)
h 


V
(
x
)


E

2
2m x
2
2
29
3b Electron Orbits
• S orbits hold 2 electrons
• P orbits hold 6 electrons
• D orbits hold 10 electrons
30
Electron Configurations
•
Bohr’s Aufbau (build up) Principle: Fill
orbits of lowest energy first (e.g. the n=1
orbit before the n=2 orbit)
•
Madelung Rule: for states (n,l), the
states with lower sum “n+l” are filled
first (because they have lower energy).
For example, 4s (4,0) would be filled before
3d (3,2).
•
Hund’s Rules (Bohr’s assistant)
31
Madelung Rule
32
Hund’s Rules
33
1. Rule of Maximum Multiplicity: maximize the
spin (e.g. put one electron into each of the three
p orbits with spins parallel, i.e. maximize
unpaired electrons).
2. For a given multiplicity, the term with the
largest value of L (orbital angular
momentum), has the lowest energy
3. The level with lowest energy (where J=L+S)
1. Outer shell Less than half filled: minimum J
2. Outer shell more than half filled: maximum J
34
3c. Max Born
•
•
1924 coins the term “Quantum Mechanics”
1925 helps with Heisenberg’s matrix form
of quantum mechanics
•
1928 The square of the quantum wave
is proportional to the probability of
finding the particle at that position.
•
Hence you can think of the quantum
wave as having a “classical” probability
density , and an “imaginary” quantum
phase part.
  e
i
References/Notes
•
•
•
•
McEvoy & Zarate, “Introducing Quantum Theory” (Totem Books, 1996)
http://www.aip.org/history/heisenberg/p08.htm (includes audio !)
http://www.uky.edu/~holler/html/orbitals_2.html
http://www.meta-synthesis.com/webbook/30_timeline/lewis_theory.php
35