Download Проблемы снижения выбросов парниковых газов в Кыргызской

Kyrgyz Republic
TES of Bishkek: first project proposal on
reduction of greenhouse gas emissions in
frameworks of clean development
mechanism
Zh. A. Molodsanova, A.K. Dzhundubaev
JSC “Electric stations”
Kyrgyz scientific and technical center “Energy”
Bishkek
Ratification of UNFCCC, КП for UNFCCC
of Kyrgyz Republic
Understanding importance of climate change
problem, necessity of international integration of
efforts of states on weakening of negative
consequences of that process, Kyrgyz Republic
has joined the UN Framework Convention on
Climate Change as well as has ratified the Kyoto
Protocol in January, 2000.
Law of Kyrgyz Republic on ratification of
UNFCCC was signed on January 14th, 2000.
Kyoto protocol has been ratified by the Law of
Kyrgyz Republic on January, 15th, 2003.
National body on CDM
One of the main requirements defining
conditions and procedures for participation in CDM
projects is creation of National body on CDM.
National committee on consequences of climate
change with functions of national body on Clean
Development Mechanism in accordance with
requirements of Kyoto protocol of Kyrgyz Republic
was created on July 18th, 2005.
Main idea of project proposal is partial
substitution of outdated equipment on a
modern one in order to decrease fuel
consumption of largest TES of Kyrgyz
Republic – Bishkek TES with set up
capacity up to date:
• Electric
– 666 thousand kWt;
• Thermal
– 1443,9 Gcal/h.
Bishkek TES
Main equipment consists of 24 steam
generating units of drum-type and 11
turbogenerator sets.
including:
• БКЗ (laterolog)-160-100 – 13 units
• БКЗ(laterolog) -220-100– 11 units
CO2 emissions of Bishkek TES, /thousand tones/
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
1332
1516
1467
1402
1273
(35,5%) (55,4%) (54,9%) (65,8%) (69,7%)
* - in brackets – coal share in fuel structure
Bishkek TES
Operating life of traps of station # 1-3 of Bishkek TES
has exceeded term of exploitation, reached overall
depreciation, inefficient, reliable in exploitation.
Reconstruction and introduction of new equipment
and technologies is required.
Bishkek TES
Idea of the project:
Replacement of three low
capacity traps БКЗ (laterolog)-160 to
one with high capacity of 420 tones of
steam per hour as a set with turbine
generator and automated system of
fuel firing management processes.
Bishkek TES
New technology of clean coal combustion (i.e.
“circulating boiling layer”) in suggested equipment
suits coal of all types, any quality as well as its
mixtures. It decreases deterioration due to less
accumulation of slugs. In addition to that, the
technology foresees fastening and capture of sulphur
and nitrogen oxides.
Economy of fuel and decrease of CO2 emissions from
reconstruction of Bishkek TES by introduction of trap
aggregate of steam production of 420 tones per hour whilst
production of thermal and electric energy on the same
level would be equal to:
Fuel,
(thousand t/year)
СО2 emissions, (million
tones/year)
102,6
0,200
Figure of TES, Bishkek
Name of indicator
Measure unit
Base line (fact,
2006)
Project line
Sale э/э
Thousand kWth
658602
658602
Sale т/э
Thousand Gcal
2053,1
2053,1
Total sale э/э+т/э
Thousand kWth
3046330,6
3046330,6
Natural fuel consumption, including:
Domestic coal
Thousand tones
13,9
20,0
Imported coal
Thousand tones
654
599,8
Coal total
Thousand tones
Oil fuel
Thousand tones
0,15
0
Million m3
143,5
79,8
Specific fuel consumption
Thousand тут
554,3
451,7
Carbon dioxide emission
Thousand tones
1320,56
1120,35
СО2kg/kWth
0,43
0,37
Natural gas
Total emission of carbon dioxide on sale of
electric and thermal energy
Carbon dioxide emission reduction/year
Thousand tones
667,9
619,8
200,21
Budget of the project
Total expenses on the project
67,5 million US dollars
Expenses for development of
Technical and Economic Assessment
0,3 million US dollars
Стоимость оборудования
43 million US dollars:
including: trap – 28 million US
dollars;
turbine - 15 million US dollars
Construction, wiring and start-andadjustment works
17,5 US$ миллионов
Administrative costs, operating
assets, conduction of preparation
works, training of personnel
0,6 million US dollars
Unexpected expenses
6,1 million US dollars
• THANK YOU!