* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download Understanding and influencing global politics towards
Climate governance wikipedia , lookup
Climate change in Tuvalu wikipedia , lookup
Attribution of recent climate change wikipedia , lookup
Climate change feedback wikipedia , lookup
Climate change mitigation wikipedia , lookup
Media coverage of global warming wikipedia , lookup
2009 United Nations Climate Change Conference wikipedia , lookup
Effects of global warming on humans wikipedia , lookup
Economics of global warming wikipedia , lookup
Citizens' Climate Lobby wikipedia , lookup
Solar radiation management wikipedia , lookup
Scientific opinion on climate change wikipedia , lookup
Economics of climate change mitigation wikipedia , lookup
Energiewende in Germany wikipedia , lookup
Climate change adaptation wikipedia , lookup
Decarbonisation measures in proposed UK electricity market reform wikipedia , lookup
Climate change, industry and society wikipedia , lookup
Climate change in the United States wikipedia , lookup
United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change wikipedia , lookup
Effects of global warming on Australia wikipedia , lookup
German Climate Action Plan 2050 wikipedia , lookup
Surveys of scientists' views on climate change wikipedia , lookup
Global Energy and Water Cycle Experiment wikipedia , lookup
Climate change and poverty wikipedia , lookup
Public opinion on global warming wikipedia , lookup
Low-carbon economy wikipedia , lookup
IPCC Fourth Assessment Report wikipedia , lookup
Carbon Pollution Reduction Scheme wikipedia , lookup
Politics of global warming wikipedia , lookup
Business action on climate change wikipedia , lookup
Mitigation of global warming in Australia wikipedia , lookup
”Understanding and influencing global politics towards Copenhagen and beyond” Comments by Anders Wijkman at Ny-Ålesund Symposium 2009. Several parallel crises: 1. 2. 3. 4. Financial crisis Climate crisis Ecosystem/Natural resources crisis Peak oil • All these crises have the same roots, unsustainable use of resources – in the economic system and in Nature. 2/3 of major ecosystems used beyond capacity Climate change and resource constraints will affect our economies negatively, will aggravate poverty in many developing countries and may lead to serious conflicts • • •Just as a few lonely economists warned us we were living beyond our financial means and overdrawing our financial assets, scientists are warning us that we’re living beyond our ecological means and overdrawing our natural assets,” argues Glenn Prickett, senior vice president at Conservation International. But, he cautioned, as environmentalists have pointed out: “Mother Nature doesn’t do bailouts.” Thomas Friedman in New York Times, march 2009. •We created a way of raising standards of living that we can’t possibly pass on to our children,” said Joe Romm, a physicist and climate expert who writes the indispensable blog climateprogress.org <http://climateprogress.org/> . We have been getting rich by depleting all our natural stocks — water, hydrocarbons, forests, rivers, fish and arable land — and not by generating renewable flows Thomas Friedman in New York Times, march 2009 ”The Quadruple Squeeze” Human growth 20/80 dilemma Ecosystems Climate 60 % loss dilemma 550/450/350 dilemma Surprise 99/1 dilemma The Planetary Response CO2, N2O, CH4 concentrations The Planetary Overfishingto global Response change drivers Land degradation (Steffen et al., 2004) Loss of Biodiversity Water Depletion Unsustainable consumption ….. 1900 1950 2000 From: Steffen et al. 2004 Climate Change 325 ppm CO2 < 1W m2 (300 – 350 ppm CO2 ; 1-1.5 W m2)) Ozone depletion < 5 % of Pre-Industrial 290 DU (0 - 10%) Atmospheric Aerosol Loading To be determined Biogeochemical loading: Global N & P Cycles Limit industrial fixation of N2 to 35 Tg N yr-1 P < 20 % inflow to Oceans Planetary Boundaries Ocean acidification Aragonite saturation ratio < 20 % below preindustrial levels Biodiversity Loss < 10 E/MSY Land System Change ≤15 % of land under crops Global Freshwater Use <4000 km3/yr (4000 – 6000 km3/yr) Chemical Pollution Plastics, Endocrine Desruptors, Nuclear Waste Emitted globally To be determined Rethink economic policy framework • Financial Crisis and Environmental Crisis have same roots unsustainable use of resources • Externalities overwhelm us; there are boundary conditions for human development we have to respect • Beyond GDP – Stiglitz Commission an opportunity, but research needed • Take Nature into account – loss of tropical forests = 2-5 trillion US p a • Implement PPP • Discountingof future values critical issue • In the EU: Merge Lisbon and SDS strategies • Reform business models Global 2ºC pathways and their risks Challenges for Copenhagen: • Mitigation – minimum 40-50 % GHG reductions for Annex 1 countries to 2020; significantly lower GHG pathways than BAU for non-Annex 1 • Emissions reduction target for 2050 – 70-80% reduction needed to meet 2° target • Special problem: how to promote forest protection? • Adaptation – 20-50 billion US p a from 2013; kick-start by funding NAPA:s now • Technology cooperation – in addition to CDM, JI etc • Include ecosystems protection • Funding? – most natural would be PPP, e g auctioning revenues, tax on bunker fuels, aviation etc EU energy/climate package • • • • • • • • • • 20% GHG reduction to 2020 – unilateral 20% Renewables, binding 20% Energy Efficiency improvement Reformed ETS Stricter CO2 standards for vehicles (120 g/km) CCS – 12 demo-plants Buildings directive Eco-design directive Global Climate Change Alliance, but limited funding Readiness to move to 30% reduction in the event of international deal in Copenhagen Negotiations not encouraging so far • Proposals on the table far away from what is needed – will result in 3-4° warming • Perception seems to be that incremental change will do • North/South distrust • Financial issues so far no progress • Negotiators don´t discuss what stabilisation requires – rather what is politically possible • EU has provided leadership so far – but that is put into question now? Put a price on Carbon • • • • ”Cap and Trade” or CO2 tax In theory, ”Cap and Trade” the most effective In reality, CO2 tax easier to implement Many good experiences w CO2 tax, such as Sweden, where CO2 tax in 1991 lead to phasing out of fossil fuels in heating of buildings • A lot of prestige invested in ”Cap and Trade” • Is a CO2 tax at all possible in the US? • One problematic issue is how to incentivise investments over the long-term? Experience w ETS • Lots of problems during starting phase - overallocation - permits allocated for free; windfall profits - what to include? – transport missing • Reform issues: - cap must be signif lowered - permits to be auctioned – but EU decision december 2008 disapp! - flanking measures to give technology push - Environment Performance Standards as parallel measure - Should forest credits be included? - How link to other ”cap and trade” regimes? - The degree of flexibility? – how much CDM? Non-ETS activities – regulation a must! • • • • • Energy efficiency, Renewables Land-use R&D Strengthen ecosystems in general Efficiency: • • • • • • • • Buildings White certificates Cars Tyres, eco-driving etc Electric equipment/Eco-design Manufacturing Resource efficiency Global standards Power supply yet to be built Future global power generation capacity GW 7% * Source: IEA; McKinsey analysis * * * * 2030 capacity yet to be built Existin g 23% capacit y * Renewables: • EU objective: 20% of energy mix in 2020 (8,5% today) – binding target • Trade between MS • Green certificates or feed-in tariffs Land-use • Agriculture, incl meat production, low tillage etc • Forests – avoided deforestation, reforestation • Bio-fuels – Obs sustainability criteria • Bio-char Energy R&D • Long neglected • Share of public funding for Energy R&D has gone down significantly since 1980 – must be multiplied • Many promising areas, like solar cells and solar thermal, off-shore wind, wave, sea currents, fuel cells, electric cars, 2nd generation biofuels, biogas, lowenergy housing etc • CCS special issue – needed but too much used as alibi to continue BAU • How to guarantee investments? – floor price on oil • Who is investing in alternatives? Public Energy R&D in IEA Countries Private-sector R&D is increasingly focused on projects with short-term payoffs. Source: IEA Databases, Doornbosch, et al., 2008 History of US Federal Government R&D Homeland Security Reagan “Star Wars” Program JFK Apollo Program Carter Energy Program Optimism the only possible attitude • Distrust must be addressed – requires commitments both on mitigation and adaptation; start adaptation NOW • 2/3 of power generation and buildings in 2030 still to be built • Mitigation saves money • Already huge opportunities to use energy more efficiently • Financial Crisis an opportunity; Rethink economic growth • Contraction and convergence OK as principle but China already beyond per capita GHG target for 2050 • Most important is to put a price on Carbon • Land use issues critical • Develop mechanisms for technology cooperation • Long term: Science – Policy Gap must be bridged