* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download Climate Change – Can science teachers play a part
Climate resilience wikipedia , lookup
Hotspot Ecosystem Research and Man's Impact On European Seas wikipedia , lookup
Effects of global warming on human health wikipedia , lookup
Climate engineering wikipedia , lookup
Climate sensitivity wikipedia , lookup
Soon and Baliunas controversy wikipedia , lookup
Climate change in the Arctic wikipedia , lookup
Michael E. Mann wikipedia , lookup
Citizens' Climate Lobby wikipedia , lookup
ExxonMobil climate change controversy wikipedia , lookup
Instrumental temperature record wikipedia , lookup
Economics of global warming wikipedia , lookup
General circulation model wikipedia , lookup
Climate governance wikipedia , lookup
Climate change adaptation wikipedia , lookup
Heaven and Earth (book) wikipedia , lookup
Climate change and agriculture wikipedia , lookup
Climatic Research Unit email controversy wikipedia , lookup
Solar radiation management wikipedia , lookup
Global warming controversy wikipedia , lookup
Global warming hiatus wikipedia , lookup
United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change wikipedia , lookup
Carbon Pollution Reduction Scheme wikipedia , lookup
Climate change denial wikipedia , lookup
Sea level rise wikipedia , lookup
Fred Singer wikipedia , lookup
Attribution of recent climate change wikipedia , lookup
Effects of global warming on oceans wikipedia , lookup
Global warming wikipedia , lookup
Politics of global warming wikipedia , lookup
Climate change in the United States wikipedia , lookup
Climate change feedback wikipedia , lookup
Climatic Research Unit documents wikipedia , lookup
Effects of global warming wikipedia , lookup
Effects of global warming on humans wikipedia , lookup
Climate change and poverty wikipedia , lookup
Climate change, industry and society wikipedia , lookup
Media coverage of global warming wikipedia , lookup
Physical impacts of climate change wikipedia , lookup
Scientific opinion on climate change wikipedia , lookup
Climate change in Tuvalu wikipedia , lookup
IPCC Fourth Assessment Report wikipedia , lookup
Public opinion on global warming wikipedia , lookup
Surveys of scientists' views on climate change wikipedia , lookup
Keith Burrows AIP Education Committee (Vic) CONASTA July 2009 YES ! In fact they should have a key role! Keith Burrows AIP Education Committee (Vic) CONASTA July 2009 Be sure to look at the ‘Notes Page’ in PowerPoint for further comments and explanations. • Would you get on this aeroplane if 1 out of 10 engineers found dangerous cracks in the wings? • How about if 9 out of 10 engineers said there were dangerous cracks in the wings and 1 said they didn’t matter? • That’s about the proportion of scientists saying climate change is dangerous! • That’s about the proportion of scientists saying climate change is dangerous! 1 July 2009 Latest news: Sea level rise worse than we thought “The bad news is that there is a growing consensus that the IPCC estimates are wildly optimistic.” “They found that ice loss is increasing fast. Greenland is now losing about 300 gigatonnes of ice per year, enough to raise sea level by 0.83 mm. Antarctica is losing about 200 gigatonnes per year, almost all of it from West Antarctica and the Antarctic Peninsula, raising levels by 0.55 mm.” (0.83 + 0.55 = 1.4 mm/yr, i.e. >1.2 metres by 2100 ) Latest news: Sea level rise worse than we thought “About 60 million people live within 1 metre of mean sea level, a number expected to grow to about 130 million by 2100.” [Mostly in the nine major river deltas in south and southeast Asia.] In Europe “a 1-metre rise in sea level will affect 13 million people … and destroy property worth $60 billion, with the Netherlands the worst affected.” “Large parts of the West Antarctic ice sheet are vulnerable to collapse which would add 3 metres to global sea levels” “Paul Blanchon's team at the National Autonomous University of Mexico in Cancun has been studying 121,000year-old coral reefs in the Yucatan Peninsula, formed during the last interglacial period when sea level peaked at around 6 metres higher than today. His findings suggest that at one point the sea rose 3 metres within 50 to 100 years.” CO2e Latest news: Sea level rise not the only problem! Latest news: Sea level rise not the only problem! • A declaration of vested interests! Download these presentations from: Download these presentations from: www.vicphysics.org Why Science Teachers? • Climate change is the most significant threat human civilization has ever faced. • In order to appreciate the magnitude of the problem, it must be seen through the lens of science. • A huge public education campaign is needed. • (as distinct from the mis-education campaign prevalent in some parts of the media) Why Us? • “These stark conclusions about the threat posed by global climate change and implications for fossil fuel use are not yet appreciated by essential governing bodies … In our view, there is an acute need for science to inform society about the costs of failure to address global warming, because of a fundamental difference between the threat posed by climate change and most prior global threats.” • The conclusion from: Dangerous human-made interference with climate: a GISS modelE study J Hansen et al. Journal of Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 7, 2287–2312, 2007 Why Us? • Two crucial points: • “...acute need for science to inform society...” • “...fundamental difference ... most prior global threats” Why Us? • “...acute need for science to inform society...” • past scientific debates – limited effect on most people (Nuclear, Acid rain, Ozone hole, GE food…) • This time we are asking everyone - EVERYONE ON EARTH - to change the way they do things… • …on the basis of a scientific discussion without OBVIOUS evidence. (And some dispute about it.) • Never before has the actual science been so important in the debate… • …because people need good reasons to change their behaviour – not just scientific ‘say-so’. Why Us? • “...fundamental difference ... most prior global threats” • Unique in human history… • Threat of war could be seen – (even if often ignored until too late). • Once climate change is obvious it will be MUCH TOO LATE... • and the consequences catastrophic. • And again, it is only understandable in scientific terms. Why Us? • Dealing with climate change will require massive adjustments to the way we do things. • Most of these adjustments are based on science, so... • people need to understand at least some basic scientific concepts: – energy – radiation – scientific method Why Us? • Climate scientists are generally: • Too busy doing their science. • Not necessarily good at communicating with the lay public. • Trying to talk to politicians. Why Us? Why Us? If we don’t do it, who else will? Why Us? • Other groups do talk about climate change: • The media – but usually trying to make a ‘debate’ out of it. Herald Sun 19 Dec 2008 Herald Sun a few days after Bolt’s article. 5 out of 6 support Bolt’s denier-ism • “Satellite data indicates the southern hemisphere has recorded no warming” • “When will the biggest scientific fraud in history fall apart?” • “The [CPRS] is a non-solution to a non-problem” (Bob Carter) • “In the last Ice Age the CO2 levels were 4000 ppm” • “heat travels from hot to cold so the colder CO2 cannot warm the surface below” • “The telling thing about the global warming faith is that it’s preached almost entirely by hypocrites” (AB) ‘Good’ articles are also published - but often hidden away in the ‘comment and debate’ section But the ‘sceptics’ always seem to get a pretty good airing – because that’s what people want to hear. And because his one vote could be vital to our future! End of part 1. Go to CCConasta09e-2.ppt