* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download Sex, Gender and What`s the Difference, Anyway?
Epigenetics of human development wikipedia , lookup
Adaptive evolution in the human genome wikipedia , lookup
Minimal genome wikipedia , lookup
Pathogenomics wikipedia , lookup
Genomic imprinting wikipedia , lookup
Genetic engineering wikipedia , lookup
Human genetic variation wikipedia , lookup
Human genome wikipedia , lookup
Human–animal hybrid wikipedia , lookup
Artificial gene synthesis wikipedia , lookup
Gene expression profiling wikipedia , lookup
Biology and consumer behaviour wikipedia , lookup
Public health genomics wikipedia , lookup
History of genetic engineering wikipedia , lookup
Gene expression programming wikipedia , lookup
Site-specific recombinase technology wikipedia , lookup
Designer baby wikipedia , lookup
Microevolution wikipedia , lookup
Thoughts on Sex, Gender and Evolution. Marianne J. Legato, M.D.* *With A Lot of Help from Charles Darwin et al. So we’ve “Cracked the Genetic Code” and “Defined The Human Genome” So? What’s a chromosome? What’s a gene? How does it work? What’s a “mutation?” Who exactly was Charles Darwin? What did he say? (And why should we care?) 1809-1882 What makes us male or female? XX XY Do we need two sexes? (The Y chromosome only arrived on the scene about 300,000,000 years ago.) Does Sex Impact Gene Expression? “Thousands of genes show sexual dimorphism in liver, adipose, muscle and the brain: they exhibit highly tissue-specific patterns of expression.. “* “We saw striking and measurable differences in more than half of the genes’ expression pattern between males and females. We didn’t expect that. no one has previously demonstrated this genetic gender gap at such high levels.”** *Yang et al. Genome. 2006 **Thomas Drake, C0 investigator Does every cell in our body have a sex? Or are some parts of us androgynous? Does every gene work the same way in men and women? So do we have (and why do we need) sex-specific tissues and organs? (I think we do, and if you believe Darwin, it equips us perfectly for the environment. ) What are genomic scientists doing worrying about saying What Scientists are Doing • Taking genes out and inserting others • Making biologic specimens capable of reproduction • Giving us a precise picture of who we are and the possibility of changing it. Evolution is no longer “natural selection”. With the advent of genetic engineering, we can- and are- changing very nature of created life. Imagine: Human cloning Engineering the characteristics of new (human?) beings prepared for specific functions (like war, for example) Prolonging the life span indefinitely Creating new biological systems capable of reproduction (and if this is so, also probably capable themselves of evolution) Genomic Science and Sex • Will it be an advantage to retain two sexes? • If we eliminate biological sex in new forms of life before we understand the nature and extent of its expression on genes, what will be the consequences to form and function? • Does the study of the impact of sex on gene expression deserve more attention? What are scientists worrying about? Consider the Impact Of Genomic Science On • The environment • Economics • The nature and number of living beings • The redistribution of power (planned and unplanned) "Ever since the discovery of nuclear fission, the possibility of powerful explosives based on it had been very much in my mind, as it had in that of many other physicists. We had some understanding of what this might do for us in the war, and how much it might change the course of history.” “I chide Goldblatt* for the incredible naiveté he and the Defense Sciences Office displayed in not thinking its plans to enhance humans would arouse controversy…. didn’t it occur to anybody that you were playing with fire?” Joel Garreau (in Radical Evolution) *Michael Goldblatt, former head of the Defense Science Office What Scientists are Saying • We are changing the rate and mechanisms of the evolution of living things profoundly. • If there is a choice between preserving the earth in a viable state or continuing the human race, we will probably opt to continue the race. “My guess is that if the question of human extinction is ever posed clearly, people will say that it’s all very well to say we’ve been a part of nature up to now, but that at this turning point in the human race’s history, it is surely essential that we do something about it; that we fix the genome to get of rid of the disease that’s causing the instability, if necessary, we clone people known to be free from the risk, because that’s the only way in which we can keep the human race alive. A still, small voice may at that stage ask, but right does the human race have to claim precedence for itself. To which my guess is the full-throated answer would be, sorry, the human race has taken a decision, and that decision is to survive. And, if you like, the hell with the rest of the ecosystem.” Sir John Maddox, Former editor of Nature Prometheus, who gave men fire.