* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download IGF1
Endocannabinoid system wikipedia , lookup
Ligand binding assay wikipedia , lookup
Point mutation wikipedia , lookup
Polyclonal B cell response wikipedia , lookup
Biochemistry wikipedia , lookup
Clinical neurochemistry wikipedia , lookup
Ultrasensitivity wikipedia , lookup
Mitogen-activated protein kinase wikipedia , lookup
Proteolysis wikipedia , lookup
Secreted frizzled-related protein 1 wikipedia , lookup
Proteases in angiogenesis wikipedia , lookup
Lipid signaling wikipedia , lookup
G protein–coupled receptor wikipedia , lookup
Biochemical cascade wikipedia , lookup
Insulin-like Growth Factor 1: “The Sulfation Factor” Koray Kevin Celik Endocrinology Seminar Dr. David Champlin Insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF-1), also name Somatomedin C in the 1980’s, is a protein hormone that in humans is encoded by the IGF1 gene. The growth factor was initially identified in 1957 by Salmon and Daughaday, and was originally nominated as the “Sulfation Factor” by the analog’s overall ability to stimulate 35-sulphate incorporation into rat cartilage. IGF-1 is a hormone similar in molecular structure to insulin. It plays an important role in childhood growth and continues to have commanding anabolic effects in adults [3]. The growth factor and protein peptide consists of 70 amino acids in a single chain with three intermolecular disulfide bridges, and has a molecular weight of 7,649 Daltons. Figure 1.0 Overall there are three major observations that led to the discovery of the IGF/Somatomedin family: The first of the three major observations occurred early in 1957 when Salmon and Daughaday first witnessed how serum stimulated the incorporation of 35 S into incubated cartilage. The serum of hypophysectomized rats lacked the sulfation action in its entirety. Furthermore, for some reason it’s activity could not be reconstituted by the addition of further quantities of growth hormone (GH) to the maturation medium, but rather it reappeared after further administration of GH to hypophysectomized rats [1]. These annotations are what eventually inspired the great Daughaday to hypothesize that the use of unaccompanied recombinant growth hormone does not actually stimulate growth processes. The use of GH satisfactorily induces the formation of factors that mediate the message of growth hormone to a certain degree. These unfathomable factors ultimately lead to the sulfation of cartilage in vitro, which reflects growth in vivo. The second of the three major observations that led to the detection of IGF/Somatoden C originated from how the majority cells require serum to grow in culture. Several growth factors in serum are known to be accountable for their growth‐promoting properties. In 1972, Pierson and Temin extracted factors from serum in which, they entitled the multiplication‐stimulating activity (MSA). These factors had molecular weights just below 10,000 Dalton’s and were subject to stimulate cells to replicate when added to a culture medium. Subsequently, they hypothesized and confirmed that cultured liver cells did indeed secrete MSA into the culture medium(s) [2]. This demonstration was the first of its kind, where we’d seen the likes of MSA being produced primarily in the liver and that MSA may eventually lead to autocrine stimulation via the same cells by which it was initially secreted. The third most imperative observation that led to the discovery of insulin‐ like growth factors stemmed from a vastly different series of observations. It was noted in great detail that serum employs insulin‐like effects on insulin target tissues such as muscle and adipose tissue. The effects of insulin on serum initially were not suppressed by the addition of anti‐insulin serum, and its effects were termed "nonsuppressible insulin-like activity" (NSILA) in the 1970s [3]. The molecules found in serum evidently are responsible for the insulin‐like effects that were investigated for and were finally identified as insulin‐like growth factors I and II [4]. Additionally there is a synthetic analog of IGF-1, known as Mecasermin, IGF-1 LR3 (long recombinant receptor grade 3) that is sold legally under the trade name Increlex. The LR3 is a long-term analog of human IGF-1, specifically designed and manufactured for mammalian cell culture to support large-scale manufacturing of recombinant biopharmaceuticals. Recombinant Human LR3 IGF-1 is a single, nonglycosylated polypeptide chain containing 83 amino acids, which encompass the complete human IGF-1 sequence with the substitution of an Arganine (R) for the Glutamic Acid (E) at position three, consequently R3, and a 13 amino acid extension peptide at the N terminus. This sequence alteration allows the recombinant hormone to circumvent binding proteins as well as to increase its respective half-life within the blood. R3 IGF-1 has been produced with the purpose of increasing biological activity and is significantly more potent than human IGF-I in vitro. The growth factor is currently being used for the treatment of growth failure and severe burns. It has a Chinese counterpart that is often replicated and seen being sold and abused in great numbers within the contexts of bodybuilding and professional sports. Figure 2.0 Within the black market paradigm there are two types made commonly available, Media and Receptor grades, respectively which ascertain predominantly to their overall quality. The synthetic analogue is seen as a principal hormonal mediator of statural growth. Under normal circumstances, after subcutaneous or intra-muscular injection, growth hormone (GH) binds to its respective receptor in the liver, as well as in several other tissues, and stimulates the synthesis and secretion of IGF-1. In target tissues, the Type 1 IGF receptor, which is homologous to the insulin receptor, which is activated by IGF-1, leading to intracellular signaling which agonizes multiple processes leading to statural growth, hyperplasia and mitogenensis. The metabolic actions of IGF-1 are in great detail directed at encouraging the overall uptake of glucose, fatty acids, and amino acids so that metabolism supports growing tissues. Figure 3.0 As seen in the image above, the diagram depicts circulating IGF-1 levels in the blood and in tissue. The majority of circulating IGF-1 is credited being produced in the liver. Hepatic IGF-1 production is subject to complex regulation by both hormonal and nutritional factors. Various IGF-binding proteins (IGFBP’s) are also produced in the liver. In IGF-responsive tissues, the ligands IGF1 and IGF2 as well as IGFBPs can be delivered through the circulation from the liver, but IGFs and IGFBPs can also be produced locally through autocrine or paracrine mechanisms [5]. These mechanisms habitually comprise interactions between stromal- and epithelial-cell subpopulations. Furthermore, Growth hormone is predominantly produced in the pituitary gland under the mechanism of the hypothalamic factors growth-hormone-releasing hormone (GHRH) with Somatostatin (SMS) acting as the major stimulator of IGF-1 production [6]. Figure 4.0 (Above) IGF-1 and its receptor IGF-1R come together to undertake a resilient proliferative signaling system. This system when agonized correctly stimulates the likes various forms of mitogenensis and halts the cell signal known as apoptosis (cell suicide). In real life situations IGF-1 acts as a precursor for countless bodily growth hormone responses, many are still being discovered today. One of the main components of the IGF-1 mitogenic signaling factor is the association of the receptor tyrosine kinase with Shc, Grb2, and Sos-1 to activate ras and the Map kinase cascade (raf, Mek, Erk) [6]. The culmination of the signaling pathways is seen at the end of the Map kinase pathway, which, is a modification of specific transcription factor activity, such as activation of ELK transcription factors. Serum response factor (SRF) and AP-1 contribute to mitogenic signaling by many factors. Phosphorylation of IRS-1 and PI3 kinase activation are also involved in IGF-1 signaling, similar to insulin signaling. Figure 5.0 As previously discussed the IGF-1 receptor is a tyrosine kinase cell-surface receptor that binds to either IGF1 or IGF2. Above we see the respective receptor(s) being triggered by IGF-1 both at the target site(s) as well as downstream. IGF-binding proteins and IGFBP proteases have significant roles in regulating ligand bioavailability. Ligands are delivered either from remote sites of production through the circulation or are locally produced. There is strong evidence that certain IGFBPs also have direct growth-regulatory actions that can stimulate beneficial mitogenensis as well as stimulate the growth of proto-oncogenes. The local bioavailability of ligands is subject to complex physiological regulation and is abnormally high in most cancers. IGF-binding proteins chef responsibilities include prolonging the half-life of the IGFs, as well as having a strong affinity for IGFs comparable to IGF1R. Moreover, it is noted that there is fierce competition between IGFBPs and IGF1R for the available ligands in tissue and in blood [5]. This potential for competition leads to the latter effect of increasing IGF1R activation. Further, The IGF2R binds to IGF2, but has no tyrosine kinase domain and appears to act as a negative influence on proliferation by reducing the amount of IGF2 available for binding to IGF1R. Certain IGFBP proteases, which are more often than not produced by neoplastic cells, cleave IGFBPs and can discharge free ligand and thereby increase IGF1R activation [6]. Subsequently, ligand binding to IGF1R, its tyrosine kinase action is activated, which further agonizes the signaling pathway through intracellular networks that control cell proliferation and cell survival. Key downstream networks include the PI3K-AKT-TOR system and the RAFMAPK systems. Activation of these pathways stimulates proliferation and inhibits apoptosis, and stimulates the TOR, target of rapamycin. Such mutations have been shown to inhibit key molecules involved in insulin signaling (IIS) and the nutrient signaling pathway Target of Rapamycin (TOR). These mutations in TOR (in this case RSKS-1) result in a 30 percent lifespan extension, while mutations in IIS (Daf-2) often result in a doubling of lifespan in the worms [7]. References [1] Binoux, M., R Hossenlopp, C. Lassarre and D. Seurin. 1980. Somatomedin production by rat liver in organ culture. I. Validity of the technique. Influence of the released material on cartilage sulphation. Effects of growth hormone and insulin. Acta Endocrinol. 93:73. [2] Dulak, N. and H. J. Temin. 1973. A partially purified polypeptide fraction from rat liver cell conditioned medium with multiplication stimulating activity for embryo fibroblasts. J. Cell. Physiol. 81:153. [3] Froesch, E. R., MD, Ch Scmid, PHD, I. Zangger, MD, and E. Eigenmann. "Journal of Clinical Investigation." Editorial. EFFECTS OF IGF/SOMATOMEDINS ON GROWTH AND DIFFERENTIATION OF MUSCLE AND BONE Jan. 1986: 57-75. Print. [4] Rinderknecht, E. and R. E. Humbel. 1978a. The amino acid sequence of human insulin-like growth factor I and its structural homology with proinsulin. J. Biol. Chem. 253:2769. [5] Perrini,, Sebastio, Luigi Laviola, Marcos C. Carreira, Angello Cignarelli, Annalisa Natalicchio, and Francesco Giorgino. "The GH/IGF1 Axis and Signaling Pathways in the Muscle and Bone: Mechanisms Underlying Age-related Skeletal Muscle Wasting and Osteoporosis." Journal of Endocrinology review (n.d.): 201-10. 2011. Web. 04 Mar. 2014 [6] "IGF-1 Technical Mode of Action on Proliferation and Neoplasia- Everything You Need to Know." Peptide Resource All About Peptides. Purepeptide.com, 2011. Web. 04 Mar. 2014. [7] Pankaj Kapahi, PhD et al. Germline Signaling Mediates the Synergistically Prolonged Longevity by Double Mutations in daf-2 and rsks-1 in C. elegans. Cell Reports, December 2013