* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download Ocean Fertilization
Survey
Document related concepts
Abyssal plain wikipedia , lookup
Pacific Ocean wikipedia , lookup
Marine debris wikipedia , lookup
Southern Ocean wikipedia , lookup
History of research ships wikipedia , lookup
Arctic Ocean wikipedia , lookup
Indian Ocean Research Group wikipedia , lookup
Marine biology wikipedia , lookup
Marine habitats wikipedia , lookup
Anoxic event wikipedia , lookup
Blue carbon wikipedia , lookup
Indian Ocean wikipedia , lookup
Marine pollution wikipedia , lookup
Physical oceanography wikipedia , lookup
Effects of global warming on oceans wikipedia , lookup
Ocean acidification wikipedia , lookup
Ecosystem of the North Pacific Subtropical Gyre wikipedia , lookup
Transcript
Introduction Since the advent of the Industrial Revolution, societies across the globe have thrived in increasing their production capacity and, as a consequence, their contribution to global emissions of greenhouse gases. Consequently, the amount of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere has increased from 280 parts per million (ppm) to 380 ppm, and the average global surface temperature has increased by 0.8°C (Bala, 2009). These increases are the results of human perturbations, and are likely to follow an upward trend over the upcoming years, leading to significant climate change that would profoundly alter ecosystems all over the world. In the past 20 years, the growth rate of fossil fuel emissions has increased from 1.3% per year in 1990 to 3.3% per year in 2006 (Canadell et al., 2007) Geoengineering involves large scale engineering of the environment in order to combat or counteract the changes in atmospheric chemistry (US National Academy of Sciences). In my previous report, I reviewed literature on the specific geoengineering scheme of ocean fertilization. This technique actively targets carbon sequestration by storing atmospheric CO2 in phytoplankton biomass, which will then be exported to the deep oceans through the biological pump. Ocean fertilization consists of providing appropriate nutrients to increase the phytoplankton population, which in turn increases the amount of carbon dioxide taken up from the atmosphere.While it seems to be a relatively simple scheme, the potential problems and complications that accompany this geoengineering strategy are vast. They range from testing issues due to scaling problems to environmental concerns, e.g. side effects such as ocean acidification and eutrophication. Figure 1 synthesizes the outcomes of the main experiments performed in the field of ocean fertilization. Experiment Southern Ocean Iron Experiment (SOFeX) (2002) Eisen Iron Experiment (EisenEx-1) (2000) Southern Ocean Iron Release Experiment (SOIREE) (1999) Outcome The downward flux of carbon was similar in magnitude to that of natural blooms and thus small relative to Earth carbon budgets (Buesseler , 2004) Limited evidence that the particles carried large quantities of carbon to the deep ocean ( Dawicki, 2003) No differences in the fluxes between fertilized and nonfertilized waters (Buesseler, 2003) Figure 1: Table showing the results from different fertilization experiments This report analyses and critiques the science behind ocean fertilization, presented in the previous literature review. A thorough discussion then leads to the final recommendation of further focused research in this field. 1 Ocean Fertilization 2011 Technical concerns Scaling issue Spatial scale, time scale, rate of addition, amount and concentration are all determinant factors that should be considered while evaluating the oceanic impact of ocean fertilization. The results of small scale experiments (tens of kilometers) are strongly influenced by the dilution of unfertilized water into the fertilized patch as well as mixing of new chemicals, which makes it difficult to extrapolate the results to larger scales/timeframes (CBD, 2009). Most importantly, many of the processes observed, especially carbon sequestration, do not scale linearly (CBD, 2009). Therefore, “large scale” experiments provide more realistic estimates of the impacts from commercial scale fertilization as well as a better assessment of the influence of surface manipulations on the sinking fluxes of particles. Defining “Large scale” All 12 small-scale experiments conducted in the field of ocean fertilization have not shown any side effects, mainly because the latter are dissipated in the ocean’s vastness (Powell, 2007). Large scale experiments would allow integrating many more factors and testing the behaviour of the oceanic system as a unit. There is currently no well established definition of “large scale”; however, there is a scientific confidence that a “threshold scale” can be determined such that fertilization up to this scale would likely not cause persistent changes to an ecosystem (IMO, 2010). The London Convention/ London Protocol Draft Assessment Framework provide a mechanism for assessing, on a case-by-case basis, proposals for ocean fertilization to determine whether they represent legitimate scientific research (IMO, 2010). This mechanism includes the evaluation of the following criteria (IMO, 2007): 1) The estimated amounts and potential impacts of iron and other materials that may be released with the iron. 2) The potential impacts of gases that may be produced by the expected phytoplankton blooms or by bacteria decomposing the dead phytoplankton. 3) The estimated extent and potential impacts of bacterial decay of the expected phytoplankton blooms, including reduced oxygen concentrations. 2 Ocean Fertilization 2011 4) The types of phytoplankton that are expected to bloom and the potential impacts of any harmful algal blooms that may develop. 5) The nature and extent of potential impacts on the marine ecosystem including naturally occurring marine species and communities. 6) The estimated amounts and timescales of carbon sequestration, taking account of partitioning between sediments and water. 7) The estimated carbon mass balance for the operation. Environmental issue The effects of large-scale ocean fertilization are presently unknown and may not be reversible (IUCN, 2008). Even individual ocean fertilization experiments could result in significant adverse impacts on the marine environment if conducted inappropriately (Greenpeace, 2007). Another challenge lies in monitoring impacts of ocean fertilization experiments. Fertilized patches move in three dimensions and current monitoring methods do not provide information on the whole volume fertilized (IUCN, 2008). Unintended impacts may also occur beyond the fertilized patch and the area being monitored. Location The concept of ocean fertilization only works in certain areas of the oceans where the deficiency of certain nutrients (e.g. iron) is the main factor limiting plankton growth. Such areas are mostly found in the Southern Ocean, the subArctic North Pacific and the equatorial Pacific (CBD, 2009). The physical and biogeochemical conditions as well as other factors such as the mixed layer depth, compensation depth and light penetration vary with location. Therefore, the choice of location is a major player in the success of the fertilization experiment. 3 Ocean Fertilization 2011 Analysis Ocean fertilization has many unintended consequences that are still unclear. Side-Effects Eutrophication and Oxygen Depletion Ocean fertilization changes the nutrients input ratios, thus affecting the productivity and structure of the marine ecosystem. The increase in concentration of the limiting nutrient can enhance algal biomass by as much as three orders of magnitude (0.2 μg L−1 for natural waters compared to 200 μg L−1 for eutrophic waters) (Gilbert et al., 2008). The algal bloom at the ocean surface reduces light penetration during the day, therefore preventing the transfer of energy to the lower layers. During the night hours, algae continue to undergo cellular respiration and can consequently deplete the water column of available oxygen. The high chlorophyll concentration is also associated with hypoxia and anoxia, occurring as a result of an increase in the oxidation rate of organic matter by bacteria. The decomposition of organic matter is coupled with the reduction of 02, which increases the oxygen demand in deep waters. “Dead Zones” are formed when oxygen demand exceeds the supply of dissolved oxygen in the water column. Another consequence of eutrophication is trophic downgrading, which results from the death of organisms at high trophic levels and their replacement by phytoplankton at the lowest trophic level. Trophic downgrading is enhanced by the fact that algae have a higher growth rate than zooplankton, their main predator, and are not efficiently transferred to higher trophic levels, primarily due to the low trophic transfer efficiency ( not all algae are palatable to zooplankton , etc..) (Gilbert et al., 2008) See figure 2. 4 Ocean Fertilization 2011 Figure 2 : The process of eutrophication as a result of an increase in supply of macronutrients such as Nitrogen and Phosphorous. The increase in the decomposition rate of organic matter, due to phytoplankton bloom, leads to enhanced oxygen consumption (by microorganisms) for the purpose of remineralisation (Killredtide.org). Ocean Acidification Ocean pH has fluctuated between 8.0 and 8.3 for the last 25 Million years (Lampitt, 2008). CO2 dissolved in the ocean rapidly reacts with water to form carbonic acid, then dissociates into bicarbonate and carbonate ions. The respective reaction equations are the following: 1st Reaction: Dissolution of CO2 in water, producing carbonic acid CO2 + H2O H2CO3 2nd Reaction: Dissociation of carbonic acid, releasing hydrogen ions and bicarbonate H2CO3 HCO3− + H+ 3rd Reaction: Dissociation of Bicarbonate, releasing hydrogen ions and Carbonate ions HCO3− H+ + CO32- These reactions add H+ ions (i.e. protons) to the oceans, thereby reducing pH and increasing acidity1. The resulting net decrease in pH will also have negative consequences on oceanic calcifying organisms, which build their external skeletal material out of calcium carbonate (CaCO3)(Hofman et al., 2010). These organisms span the food chain from autotrophs to heterotrophs and include organisms such as coccolithophores, corals, foraminifera, echinoderms, crustaceans and molluscs. Under normal conditions, the surface ocean is saturated in calcium carbonate (including its several mineral forms such as calcite and aragonite), providing enough calcium and carbonate ions for calcifying marine organisms, thus preventing corrosion of their shells (Hofman et al., 2010). The increase in oceanic CO2 absorption due to fertilization considerably raises the concentration of H+ ions, which stimulates their reaction with carbonate ions to reform bicarbonate: H+ + CO32- HCO3−. With the smaller amount of carbonate ions available, structures made of calcium carbonate such as coral reefs are deprived of their growth source as well as vulnerable to dissolution. The pH log scale, pH=-log[H+], means that for every unit decrease on the pH scale, the hydrogen ion concentration has increased 10 folds 1 5 Ocean Fertilization 2011 Figure 3: Graph displaying the proportion of the saturating concentrations for three dissolved inorganic compounds CO2, HCO3- and CO32- as a function of the ocean/seawater pH. A shift to the right or a decrease in acidity is due to an increase in the concentration of CO32- and a decrease in the concentration of CO2. A shift to the left or an increase in acidity is due to a decrease in the concentration of CO32- and an increase in the concentration of CO2. The latter is a consequence of ocean fertilization (Friedland, 2010). Production of climate-relevant gases Ocean fertilization enhances the production of potent greenhouse gases nitrous oxide (N2O) and methane (CH4), which are respectively 300 times and 25 times more effective as greenhouse gases than carbon dioxide (Greenpeace, 2007). Much of the methane and nitrous oxide arise from microbial activity in and around sinking particles of particulate carbon. Anaerobic conditions stimulate denitrification, the conversion of Nitrate and Nitrite to Nitrous oxide then Nitrogen gas , and methanogenesis, the production of methane by methanogens during the last step in the decay of organic matter (EPA, 2010). Ocean fertilization spurs the export rate of organic materials, thereby expanding low oxygen zones (by prompting mineralisation). In some regions of the ocean, large areas of surface water can become oxygen depleted, allowing active denitrification and methanogenesis in open water and leading to rising nitrous oxide and methane emissions. Additionally, some phytoplankton classes, such as Dinophycease and Prymnesiophycea might produce more of a chemical called dimethylsulfide (DMS), which can drift into the atmosphere and encourage cloud formation, thus cooling the atmosphere and helping to counteract greenhouse warming (EPA, 2010). One way of evaluating the effect of each gas is through radiative forcing, which is a measure of the influence of that gas in altering the balance of incoming and outgoing energy in the Earth-atmosphere system and is an index of the importance of the gas in climate 6 Ocean Fertilization 2011 change (IPCC). Ocean fertilization is likely to alter the concentrations of gases and aerosols affecting the radiative balance of the Earth (Lampitt, 2008). The following figure summarizes the expected variations. Radiative Forcing 2 1.5 1 Radiative Forcing 0.5 0 CO2 CH4 DMS NO2 Figure 4 : Chart displaying the change in radiative forcing in (W/m2) for different gases with respect to preindustrial conditions defined at 1750. (Lampitt, 2008) Test Experiments Comparison experiments One way of testing ocean fertilization would be to perform the same experiment (i.e. add the same amount and type of fertilizer) in multiple locations and compare the magnitude of the photosynthetic phytoplankton bloom and side effects. This approach will enable the division of the oceans into different “fertilization regions” that have a common limiting nutrient. Gradual Scaling Another way of testing ocean fertilization would be to gradually scale up the experiments until the wanted parameters, such as the rate of gas production, the storage time of carbon, the change in pH and CO32- concentration, become measurable with the available tools. An alternative to this would be to develop complex apparatuses capable of measuring these parameters with greater precision, thus making small-scale experiments fully exploitable. 7 Ocean Fertilization 2011 Artificial Upwelling Instead of providing fertilizers to enhance the downward flux of carbon, one could also exploit the motion of waves to bring up nutrients from deep waters to the surface. British scientists James Lovelock and Chris Rapley developed a whole new concept based on that idea. Long tubes extending from the nutrient-poor surface to nutrient-rich cold waters would allow the pumping of deep water through the harnessing of wave energy. Although this method seems to mimic anthropogenic nutrient addition, it does not guarantee the wanted kind of biological growth (i.e. photosynthetic picoplankton) at the surface (ScienceDaily, 2009). This is due to the upwelling of random nutrients from the deep ocean. This same method can also bring up water enriched with carbon dioxide, which can de-gas into the atmosphere. One way of avoiding the upwelling of unwanted elements would be to pump water that contains specific ratios of nutrients (particularly nitrogen and phosphorus), instead of carbon dioxide, by targeting different depths (ScienceDaily, 2009). Conclusion and Recommendation The investigation of ocean fertilization indicates that the level of scientific understanding is insufficient to recommend its potential use for carbon sequestration. Based on this observation, I recommend further focused research in that field. This research should be conducted at a sufficiently large scale that will enable the assessment of the different parameters (i.e. the rate of gas production, the storage time of carbon, the change in pH and CO32- concentration, etc...) The research should also target specific aspects of the carbon storage process including the downward carbon flux, the storage time of carbon, the ocean acidity, the concentration of CO32- , the oxygen concentration and gas emissions. I strongly advocate that scientific research into ocean fertilization include both macronutrient and micronutrient fertilization. The two types of fertilization are considerably different and applicable in diverse regions of the world. One promising experiment to look into would be the use of tubes to enhance upwelling of nutrients, mainly because it seems more durable than other fertilization means. This experiment will also allow a better understanding of natural systems such as the biological pump. This being said, researching the topic of ocean fertilization should be given priority over other geoengineering topics since it involves a much more complex system of interaction that is still unclear. 8 Ocean Fertilization 2011 Annexe Works Cited Bala, G. "Problems with Geoengineering Schemes to Combat Climate Change." Current science 96.1 (2009): 41-8. Buesseler, Ken O., et al. "The Effects of Iron Fertilization on Carbon Sequestration in the Southern Ocean." Science 304.5669 (2004): 414-7. Buesseler, Ken O., and Philip W. Boyd. "Will Ocean Fertilization Work?" Science 300.5616 (2003): 67-8. Glibert, Patricia M., et al. "Ocean Urea Fertilization for Carbon Credits Poses High Ecological Risks." Marine pollution bulletin 56.6 (2008): 1049-56. Lampitt, R. S., et al. "Ocean Fertilization: A Potential Means of Geoengineering?" Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences 366.1882 (2008): 3919-45. Dawicki, “Will Ocean Fertilization To Remove Carbon Dioxide From the Atmosphere Work?” Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution (WHOI) 2003 United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), “Methane and Nitrous Oxide Emissions From Natural Sources” 2010 Greenpeace Research Laboratories, “A scientific critique of oceanic iron fertilization as a climate change mitigation strategy” 2007 International Maritime Organization (IMO), “Ocean fertilization: assessment framework for scientific research involving ocean fertilization” 2010 International Maritime Organization (IMO), “Convention on the prevention of maritime pollution”, July 2007 Friedland, “Ocean Acidification”, The Political Climate 2010 Romm, “Ocean Fertilization for Geoengineering should be abandoned”, Climate Progress 2009 Hofman, “The Effect of Ocean Acidification on Calcifying Organisms in Marine Ecosystems: An Organismto-Ecosystem Perspective” 2010 Cannadel, The Global Carbon Cycle : Integrating Humans, Climate, and the Natural World. Washington, DC: Island Press, 2007 9 Ocean Fertilization 2011 The Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD), “Scientific Synthesis on the impacts of ocean fertilization on marine biodiversity”, 2009 International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN), “Ocean Fertilization : Engineering the world’s climate” , December 2008 ScienceDaily, “Complex Ocean Behavior Studied With Artificial Upwelling”, September 2008 The US National Academy of Sciences Killredtide.org 10