Download BUSINESS PROBLEM CASE STUDY

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts

Yield management wikipedia , lookup

Internal communications wikipedia , lookup

Social media marketing wikipedia , lookup

Bayesian inference in marketing wikipedia , lookup

Neuromarketing wikipedia , lookup

Sales process engineering wikipedia , lookup

Food marketing wikipedia , lookup

Marketing channel wikipedia , lookup

Marketing communications wikipedia , lookup

Target audience wikipedia , lookup

Affiliate marketing wikipedia , lookup

Sports marketing wikipedia , lookup

Target market wikipedia , lookup

Marketing research wikipedia , lookup

Marketing strategy wikipedia , lookup

Youth marketing wikipedia , lookup

Multi-level marketing wikipedia , lookup

Digital marketing wikipedia , lookup

Sensory branding wikipedia , lookup

Integrated marketing communications wikipedia , lookup

Ambush marketing wikipedia , lookup

Marketing wikipedia , lookup

Guerrilla marketing wikipedia , lookup

Advertising campaign wikipedia , lookup

Direct marketing wikipedia , lookup

Marketing plan wikipedia , lookup

Multicultural marketing wikipedia , lookup

Viral marketing wikipedia , lookup

Green marketing wikipedia , lookup

Marketing mix modeling wikipedia , lookup

Global marketing wikipedia , lookup

Street marketing wikipedia , lookup

Transcript
CASE STUDY
Campaign
Management Upgrade
BUSINESS
PROBLEM
An industry leading airline company was working with a dated campaign management software system, using a version that was no
longer being supported by the software vendor. Compounding their outbound marketing issues, their campaigns constantly changed
ownership, their historical campaign data was not being captured accurately and there were all too frequent marketing operation issues.
They were ready to take a fresh look at their marketing ‘wants & needs’ and align them with a more current version of EMM (Enterprise
Marketing Management) software to incorporate some of the industry’s newer functionality - enhancing their marketing organizations
capabilities while providing a solid foundation for future growth and flexibility.
CLIENT PAIN POINTS
1) Lacked Governance,
Standardization and Best Practices
2) Inaccurate and Incomplete
Campaign System of Record
3) Poor Application Administration
and Contact File Management
The marketing department had continuously
evolved from the time the campaign management system was originally implemented.
Over time, marketing campaigns had changed
owners with each new one adding their own
code. These layered campaigns were always
being executed, but the reasons for some of
the coding were not always understood - especially since many business rules had changed
over time. The situation was further intensified
by different coding interpretations of specific
global business rules that were not consistent
across campaigns, nor documented, eventually
resulting in the loss of potential contacts from
some campaigns.
In their old campaigning process they were
not accurately capturing a historic record
of all of the marketing touches a customer
received. This led to an internal misrepresentation of how often customers were being
contacted (we discovered they were losing
track of as many as 25% of their marketing
touches!). In addition, because the loading
of the contact history records was a manual,
multi-step process it was not uncommon
to have some issues while trying to load the
data. These loading issues resulted in loosing
valuable time to identify the problem
and fix it so the records could be loaded
into the database.
From the manual file processing and the
build-up of old and historical marketing
campaigns, there was a perpetual accumulation
of files on the marketing application
server to the point where it needed to be
frequently cleaned up so the current run
of marketing campaigns could process
uninterrupted (and create more files). The
file structure was over-personalized and
redundant leading to operational delays in
locating, using and deleting files.
THE SOLUTION
Covalent Marketing did a complete upgrade, using our experience based campaign management project delivery methodology and best
practices. We re-evaluated their marketing processes and subsequently:
• Added/ Implemented new automated marketing capabilities
– Making it less labor intensive
• Standardized, templated, and centralized global and frequently
reused business processes
– Encouraging consistency
• Streamlined their contact history process removing old trouble spots
– Improving data accuracy
• Evaluated, reorganized and removed old files and scripts
– Freeing up disk space, making a logical folder hierarchy
• Enhanced their marketing measurement capabilities
– Helping close the database marketing loop
BUSINESS RESULTS
As a result of the upgrade, the client gained a much more efficient marketing operation.
• Their campaigns are fully documented and use several marketing best practices – and those marketing campaigns that Covalent
Marketing built have execution times that run up to 35% faster,saving hours of processing time!
• They can now swiftly and correctly log their outbound marketing touches directly from an automated process built in to the campaign
management tool giving them a precise, 100% accurate historical view of their past marketing efforts.
• Eliminated inefficiencies around file and script management.
• And with some forward thinking Covalent Marketing was able to set the table for them to upgrade/enhanced their reporting capabilities
for when the time comes.
225 W. Ohio, Sixth Floor | Chicago, Illinois 60654
Phone: 312.582.4550 | Fax: 312.674.7655 | www.CovalentMarketing.com
© 2010 Covalent Marketing