Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Genome (book) wikipedia , lookup
Gene nomenclature wikipedia , lookup
Microevolution wikipedia , lookup
Epigenetics of depression wikipedia , lookup
Artificial gene synthesis wikipedia , lookup
Genome evolution wikipedia , lookup
Designer baby wikipedia , lookup
Gene expression programming wikipedia , lookup
Site-specific recombinase technology wikipedia , lookup
Epigenetics of neurodegenerative diseases wikipedia , lookup
The manuscript by Flavell et al. concerns dissection of a neural circuit that underlies aspects of C. elegans foraging behavior. My goal in picking this paper is to highlight spatial aspects of gene function, requiring selective inactivation or activation of a gene in subsets of places that a gene is expressed, and temporal aspects of gene function/signaling, requiring strategies for rapidly turning pathways on/off. There is no need to become overly concerned/stuck in details of the neural circuit or quantitative methods (e.g. hidden Markov models), used to measure the behavioral states. Here is some quick background: C. elegans foraging: C. elegans move and turn with different speeds and frequencies on and off of food. These movement patterns have been interpreted as foraging strategies. For example, less turns and more rapid movement allows animals to explore larger areas. The paper explores two movement patterns while on food: dwelling (defined as lots of turns and relatively little movement away from a spot), and roaming (less turns and longer distances covered). Animals on food and without obvious external cues switch back and forth between these states. C. elegans neurons: All neurons of C. elegans are known by their names! For example, ASI, ASG, NSM….For the purposes of the discussion, the names don’t matter other than a way of keeping track of what is expressed and functions where. Serotonin signaling: 5-hydroxytryptamine, serotonin, is a neuromodulator that is derived from tryptophan. The rate-limiting enzyme for serotonin production is tryptophan hydroxylase, tph. The hermaphrodite C. elegans tph-1 is expressed in only a few neurons: sensory ADF, neurosecretory NSM in the pharyngeal foregut, and the HSN (involved in egg laying, previous discussion paper). Under certain conditions, e.g. hypoxia, tph-1 expression also appears in other neurons, ASG. In turn, serotonin acts through either G-protein coupled serotonergic receptors (ser-1, -4, -5, -7) or a chloride-gated ion channel (mod-1). Once serotonin is released, it is taken back up through action of a re-uptake transporter named MOD-5. Neural secretions: Biogenic amines, such as serotonin, or neuropeptides, such as PDF, are packaged into vesicles, named dense-core vesicles (DCVs). Secretion of dense-core vesicles is a beautifully orchestrated set of events that include opening and closing of ion channels, influx of calcium, and the calcium responsive machinery that regulates fusion of the DCVs with the plasma membrane (causing release of DCV contents). Therefore, one can promote or block release of DCVs by depolarizing or hyperpolarizing (changes in ionic flux across the plasma membrane) of neurons. Monitoring neural activity: As neural activity often involves a change of calcium flux in/out of the cells, fluorescent calcium reporters have been used as a proxy for monitoring neural activity. mosSCI: This is a transposon-based system for inserting genes into the C. elegans genome. Until CRISPR came along, there has not been a good way for targeting a transgene to a specific genomic locus. You need not worry about the details of mosSCI other than it was a way of inserting a gene somewhere in the genome. Discussion points: 1. Figure 1: Why did the authors only look at a handful of mutants rather than doing a screen? 2. What pieces of evidence do the authors use to claim that tph-1 and mod1 are part of the same pathway in these behaviors? 3. Figure 1 (D and E) and Figure 3: Discuss the strategies used to investigate sites of tph-1 and mod-1 function. 4. Figure 5. What is the point of the optogenetic manipulations? 5. Figure 6. Discuss the strategies used to selectively remove or reconstitute PDFR-1 function in different neurons. 6. What is the point of the BlaC experiment? 7. At the very big picture level, is there anything in this process that is reminiscent of the phage lambda (lysis versus lysogeny) decision?