* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download see PowerPoint shared by Paul
Jurisprudence wikipedia , lookup
Cosmopolitanism wikipedia , lookup
Individualism wikipedia , lookup
Ethics of eating meat wikipedia , lookup
Lawrence Kohlberg wikipedia , lookup
Moral disengagement wikipedia , lookup
Moral development wikipedia , lookup
J. Baird Callicott wikipedia , lookup
Declaration of Helsinki wikipedia , lookup
Virtue ethics wikipedia , lookup
Lawrence Kohlberg's stages of moral development wikipedia , lookup
Primary care ethics wikipedia , lookup
Bernard Williams wikipedia , lookup
Morality throughout the Life Span wikipedia , lookup
Ethics of technology wikipedia , lookup
Moral relativism wikipedia , lookup
Marketing ethics wikipedia , lookup
Sexual ethics wikipedia , lookup
Organizational technoethics wikipedia , lookup
Alasdair MacIntyre wikipedia , lookup
Compliance and ethics program wikipedia , lookup
Aristotelian ethics wikipedia , lookup
Kantian ethics wikipedia , lookup
Moral responsibility wikipedia , lookup
Accounting ethics wikipedia , lookup
Clare Palmer wikipedia , lookup
Utilitarianism wikipedia , lookup
Critique of Practical Reason wikipedia , lookup
Medical ethics wikipedia , lookup
Arthur Schafer wikipedia , lookup
Ethical intuitionism wikipedia , lookup
Thomas Hill Green wikipedia , lookup
Consequentialism wikipedia , lookup
Morality and religion wikipedia , lookup
Ethics of artificial intelligence wikipedia , lookup
Secular morality wikipedia , lookup
Business ethics wikipedia , lookup
Introduction to Ethics Definitions, moral theories and principles Presented by Dr. Paul Voakes at CSMA Winter Thaw 2017 What is Ethics, anyway? Three serviceable definitions (New Oxford American) “Moral principles that govern a person’s or group’s behavior” (Random House): “study dealing with values relating to human conduct, with respect to the rightness or wrongness of certain actions . . . And the motives and ends of such actions.” Paul Voakes: The process of making rational choices between what is morally justifiable and unjustifiable What Ethics Isn’t It’s not intuitive – it’s deliberate, rational – Good ethical decisions are based on evidencebased reasoning, not gut feelings We try to ‘do’ ethics, not ‘have’ ethics A code of ethics is NOT a legal code What Ethics Isn’t Ethics is not the same as ‘morals’ – Morality: a set of beliefs one embraces, to provide the basis for right/wrong, good/bad distinctions – Ethics brings morality into real-life dilemmas*, concluding with ‘what ought to be done’ *Why are they dilemmas? Because two or more moral values are in conflict So, what’s the correct answer? Usually, multiple justifiable decisions Let’s teach tools for ethical reasoning, not simply do’s and don’t’s Each situation is different, to be sure – But our system of thinking about ‘doing the right thing’ should be consistent – And beyond journalism: It doesn’t hurt to be able to apply the tools to ‘teen life’ Let’s not confuse Law and Ethics Law – Rights, requirements, prohibitions that are enforceable by government – ‘Must,’ ‘must not,’ ‘can,’ ‘cannot . . .’ Let’s not confuse Law and Ethics Ethics – Seeking morally justifiable behaviors – ‘Ought,’ ‘ought not’ – In an ethical dilemma, don’t stop once you’ve discovered what the law says ‘It’s OK legally, but is it ethical?’ Why moral principles? Certain principles have withstood decades – centuries – of scrutiny Principles underlie – and help justify – the ethical decisions we must make Principles provide continuity – – – – In one person’s job Throughout one person’s life Through an organization’s life Throughout a culture or society The great moral theories: Deontology The Categorical Imperative – Immanuel Kant – Embrace any moral rule that should be applied universally – A moral rule NOT subject to conditions or special circumstances (examples?) – And . . . human beings are never treated as a means to an end, but as the “end,” in and of themselves Deontology, cont’d. Deontologists have ‘duties’ – Strict duties (prohibitions) – Meritorious duties (positive acts) Even consequences are irrelevant! Categorical imperatives for journalism? Advantages of deontology A code of ethics! But . . . Disadvantages of deontology Utilitarianism A strain of Consequentialis Jeremy Bentham, John Stuart Mill Focuses not on the act itself, but on the likely results of the act Goal: Result produces the ‘aggregate good’ – the greatest good for the greatest number – And yes, occasionally some must be harmed in order to benefit the many The important converse: Minimize the harm to those who will probably be harmed Utilitarianism cont’d. Hedonism: Is everybody happy? – ‘Pleasure’ now taken to mean high-order ‘goods: Freedom, justice, knowledge, prosperity Act Utilitarianism: Stop to analyze likely outcomes of each decision Utilitarianism is fundamentally more democratic Utilitarianism, cont’d. So how does it work? (back to lying, Robin Hood) For Journalism: The sharing of important information is a commonlyinvoked ‘greater good’ Advantages? (Crystal Ball’? Judge the intentions of my greater-good forecasting, not the accuracy!) Disadvantages? (The Crystal Ball again!) Hybrids of these two? Mixed-rule deontology (e.g. Lying to protect? Robin Hood thievery?) Rule Utilitarianism: Know that certain acts tend to consistently produce desirable outcomes A third tried-and-true approach Aristotle’s Golden Mean Virtue lies in the ‘moderate middle’ between excess and deficiency – Between stinginess and wastefulness? – Between cowardice and foolhardiness? – Between bashfulness and shamelessness?