* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download Slides 6
Neuroeconomics wikipedia , lookup
Theory of reasoned action wikipedia , lookup
Applied behavior analysis wikipedia , lookup
Verbal Behavior wikipedia , lookup
Teen dating violence wikipedia , lookup
Shock collar wikipedia , lookup
Insufficient justification wikipedia , lookup
Behavior analysis of child development wikipedia , lookup
Psychophysics wikipedia , lookup
Eyeblink conditioning wikipedia , lookup
Behaviorism wikipedia , lookup
Psychological behaviorism wikipedia , lookup
Chapter Six Learning Classical Conditioning Operant Conditioning Observational Learning Part One: Classical Conditioning Classical Conditioning is conditioning by association, such as a pet getting excited whenver she hears a certain car arriving because she associates it with her owner coming home. • Pavlov (1906) • fundamental concepts • further concepts Watson & Rayner (1920) • influencing factors Rescorla (1968) • special cases Garcia & Koelling (1966) Pavlov (1906) Ivon Pavlov24 gave dogs specific stimuli, such as the ringing of a bell, several times, each immediately prior to providing them with food. The dogs salivated because of the food. Later, the dogs would salivate at the sound of the bell, in anticipation of the food. Fundamental concepts of classical conditioning Term Unconditioned Stimulus (UCS) Unconditioned Response (UCR) Conditioned Stimulus (CS) Conditioned Response (CR) Definition stimulus that naturally causes an unconditioned response (without need for conditioning) natural response to a stimulus (without need for conditioning) stimulus that does not naturally cause a given response but does after being paired sufficiently with an unconditioned stimulus response to a stimulus that does not naturally elicit that response Example The smell of food is a natural stimulus for dogs. Dogs will naturally salivate when they smell food. The sound of a bell was paired with food for Pavlov’s dogs. The sound of a cart does not naturally elicit salivation, but it did for Pavlov’s dogs. Further concepts of conditioning Term Acquisition Stimulus Generalization Stimulus Discrimination Extinction Spontaneous Recovery Definition Example creating a conditioned behavior Pavlov’s dogs heard the bell by pairing a CS with a UCS each time right before being fed. responding to stimuli similar but Pavlov’s dogs would salivate not identical to the CS even if the bell-ringing was louder or higher pitched. not responding to stimuli Pavlov’s dogs would not salivate different from the CS to the sound of a horn. eliminating a CR by consistently After receiving no meat powder presenting the CS without the after several bell ringinings, UCS Pavlov’s dogs would unlearn the CR. regaining a CR after a rest period Days after the CR was following extinction extinguished, a ringing bell may again elicit a CR. Watson & Rayner (1920) John Watson17 and Rosalie Rayner let an 11month-old infant, Little Albert, play with a fluffy white rat. Each time he reached for it, they scared him with a very loud noise from a hammer and metal. Later they gave him the rat unaccompanied by the noise, and did the same with similar items. Term For Little Albert Unconditioned Stimulus The loud noise was naturally scary. Unconditioned Response He naturally experienced fear from the noise. Conditioned Stimulus The noise elicited fear now that it was paired with the rat. Conditioned Response He developed a fear of the rat. Stimulus Generalization He also showed a fear response to a fluffy rabbit, a Santa Claus mask, Watson’s white hair, etc. Stimulus Discrimination He showed less fear response to a dog, and none to people’s hair that wasn’t white. Extinction Eventually his conditioned fear of rats and related things might fade as he experienced them not paired with scary noises. Factors influencing classical conditioning In most cases, there are two factors that are essential for classical conditioning to take place: The unconditioned stimulus should be more likely to occur after an occurance of the conditioned stimulus than at another random time, and it should be immediate rather than delayed. As an example, consider the episode from The Office in which Jim offered Dwight an altoid each time his computer made a restart sound. Term Optimal conditions Temporal Contiguity The UCS immediately follows the CS. Contingency The UCS has a higher probability following an instance of the CS than at another random time. How Jim could have failed letting time elapse between the sound and the altoid offering sometimes not offering an altoid after the tone, and sometimes offering an altoid without the tone Rescorla (1968) Participants: 24 rats Procedure: Over a five-day conditioning period, rats experienced a series of 12 two-minute tones, each followed by eight minutes without a tone. During some of these tones they received a ½-second shock. Independent Variable: contingency—received no additional shocks, or also received shocks at random times without the tone Dependent Variable: conditioned fear of the tone Results: The rats that experienced shocks only when they heard the tone were conditioned to fear the tone, but the others were not. Conclusion: For the rats to be conditioned to fear the tone, they had to know that the shock would not happen without it. Special cases of classical conditioning Term Higher-Order Conditioning Conditioned Taste Aversion Definition Distinction Example using a CS as a UCS to The CS is never actually A rat conditioned to create a CR to a new CS paired with a true UCS. fear a red light because an electric shock will follow can be conditioned to fear a blue light because a red light will follow. conditioning pairing The UCS can happen Carli got sick after taste or smell with long after the CS, and drinking tequila; now nausea can be effective after she feels sick at the just one pairing. smell of it. Garcia86 & Koelling (1966) Participants: 10 rats Procedure: Punishment was applied for drinking water with a specific characteristic. Independent Variable I: unique aspect of water—gustatory or audio-visual Independent Variable II: type of punishment—nausea or shock Independent Variable III: delay before punishment—none or 20 minutes Dependent Variable: avoidance of water Results: In the audio-visual condition, only shock caused avoidance, and only minimally so in the delayed punishment condition. In the gustatory condition, only nausea caused avoidance, but did so equally in the immediate and delayed condition. Conclusion: When punishment results from eating, making the results not immediately known, the effects were linked even though they did not occur until much later. Without this, it would be impossible to learn what is dangerous and should be avoided. Part Two: Operant Conditioning Operant Conditioning is conditioning through reinforcement and punishment, such as circus animals learning tricks by getting treats when they perform a desired behavior. It is called operant conditioning because it is based on organisms operating on their enviornment to effect a desired outcome (or avoid an undesired one), as opposed to classical conditioning which is more automated. • fundamental concepts Project Pigeon • special cases Seligman & Meier (1967) Fundamental concepts of operant conditioning B. F. Skinner1 developed an “operant chamber” (later commonly called a Skinner Box) in which reinforcements and punishments could be administered to an animal in response to specific behaviors. Term Definition Skinner Box Example Positive Reinforcement making a behavior more likely A rat gets food by pushing a by adding a desirable stimulus lever whenever a green light comes on. Negative Reinforcement making a behavior more likely A rat prevents getting shocked by removing an undesirable by pusing a lever whenever a stimulus green light comes on. Punishment making a behavior less likely A rat gets shocked whenever he pushes a lever while a red light is on. Project Pigeon B. F. Skinner1 headed a World War II effort to create a missile-guidance system operated by pigeons (Skinner, 1960). The pigeons were trained to steer the missile by pecking at a target projected onto a touch screen triggered by interruptions in airflow. Test simulations showed the system to be highly effective. Special cases of operant conditioning Term Shaping Definition conditioning successively more specific behaviors Learned Helplessness conditioned failure to attempt to remedy unpleasant situations due to previous exposure to other unpleasant situations in which the organism had no control Distinction The criterion required for reinforcement gradually increases in scope. The organism is conditioned to be helpless in general, including in contexts unrelated to the original conditioning. Example A bear is reinforced for coming near a tricycle until he learns to do so; then he is rewarded for sitting on it, then for putting his feet on the pedals, then for pushing the pedals. A student who loses her job and is unable to get a new one gives up in general and stops studying for her midterms. Seligman31 & Maier (1967) shocks avoided later Participants: 24 dogs of no specific breed Procedure: Each dog in the two experimental conditions was placed in a box in which the lights would periodically go out, signaling an oncoming shock. In the escape condition, the dog could avoid the shock by pressing a panel. In the learned helplessness condition, the dog could not control the shocks, which were matched in duration to those received in the escape condition. The next day, each each dog was placed in a different box. For each of 10 trials, the dog would be shocked if he did not jump to the other side of this box when the lights went out. Independent Variable: original conditioning— 100% none, escape, or learned helplessness 75% Dependent Variable: learning to escape the shock in the second box 50% Results: Dogs that learned they had no control in the 25% first situation did not attempt to learn how to escape the shocks in the next situation. 0% none escape learned helplessness Conclusion: Appropriate feelings of helplessness can original conditioning carry over to contexts in which they are not appropriate. Part Three: Observational Learning Observational Learning is learning by observing others’ behaviors and their consequences. A person being observed in this way is called a model. • Bandura, Ross, & Ross (1961) • fundamental concepts statement on media violence Bandura31, Ross & Ross (1961) mean physical imitative aggression score Participants: 36 boys and 36 girls, ages 3 to 5, from Stanford Nursery Procedure: While the child did artwork in one corner of a room, an adult played with tinker toys in another. In the aggressive condition, after a minute the adult attacked a bobo doll. After 10 minutes, the experimenter took the child to a new toy room, but after allowing a moment’s play induced frustration by stating that these toys were reserved for others. Finally, the child was taken to a room with a bobo doll and other toys. Independent Variable I: aggression of model—none or bobo doll attack Independent Variable II: sex of child Independent Variable III: sex of model—same 30 aggressive model as child or different nonaggressive model 20 Dependent Variable: aggressive acts imitating the model 10 Results: Children tended to imitate adults’ aggressive behaviors, especially physical aggression 0 child: male female for boys and verbal aggression for girls. Both sexes model: samedifferentsamedifferent were more likely to imitate same-sex models. sex Conclusion: Children learn by watching others. Fundamental concepts of observational learning Term Attention Retention Ability Motivation Definition being aware of another’s behavior and its consequences remembering what was observed being able to reproduce the observed behavior believing that reproducing the behavior will provide positive consequences Example from Bobo doll The kids watched the adult’s aggressive behavior. The kids remembered the adult’s general aggression and details of it. The kids could easily mimic the adult’s behavior. The kids had an outlet for their frustration of having toys taken away. Joint statement to congress on media violence In 2000, the six major organiztions listed below provided a joint statement to congress on the effects of media violence, including the excerpts quoted below. “At this time, well over 1000 studies point overwhelmingly to a causal connection between media violence and aggressive behavior in some children. The conclusion of the public health community, based on over 30 years of research, is that viewing entertainment violence can lead to increases in aggressive attitudes, values and behavior, particularly in children.” In particular, exposure to media violence is believed to increase… acceptance of “Children who see a lot of violence are more likely to view violence as an violence effective way of settling conflicts.” emotional “Viewing violence can decrease the likelihood that one will take action on desensitization behalf of a victim when violence occurs.” fear “Viewing violence increases fear of becoming a victim of violence, with a resultant increase in self-protective behaviors and a mistrust of others.” acts of violence “Children exposed to violent programming at a young age have a higher tendency for violent and aggressive behavior later in life than children who are not so exposed.” • American Medical Association • American Academy of Pediatrics • American Psychiactric Association • American Academy of Family Physicians • American Psychological Association • American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry