Download The nature versus nurture debate is one of the

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts

Theory of reasoned action wikipedia , lookup

Developmental psychology wikipedia , lookup

Theory of planned behavior wikipedia , lookup

Behavior analysis of child development wikipedia , lookup

Music psychology wikipedia , lookup

Inclusive fitness in humans wikipedia , lookup

Human nature wikipedia , lookup

Cross-cultural psychology wikipedia , lookup

Personality psychology wikipedia , lookup

Abnormal psychology wikipedia , lookup

Subfields of psychology wikipedia , lookup

Social psychology wikipedia , lookup

Ecospirituality wikipedia , lookup

Behaviorism wikipedia , lookup

Thin-slicing wikipedia , lookup

Psychological behaviorism wikipedia , lookup

Social perception wikipedia , lookup

Behavioral modernity wikipedia , lookup

Attribution (psychology) wikipedia , lookup

Conservation psychology wikipedia , lookup

Descriptive psychology wikipedia , lookup

Nature versus nurture wikipedia , lookup

Transcript
NATURE-NURTURE CONTROVERSY AS IT RELATES TO ME AND MY
CAREER
The nature versus nurture debate is one of the oldest philosophical issues within
psychology. So what exactly is the nature versus nurture debate all about?

Nature refers to all of the genes and hereditary factors that influence who
we are – from our physical appearance to our personality characteristics.

Nurture refers to all the environmental variables that impact who we are,
including our early childhood experiences, how we were raised, our social
relationships, and our surrounding culture.
Even today, different branches of psychology often take a one versus the other
approach. For example, biological psychology tends to stress the importance of
genetics and biological influences. Behaviorism, on the other hand, focuses on the
impact that the environment has on behavior.
A CLOSER LOOK AT THE NATURE VS. NURTURE DEBATE
Do genetic or environmental factors have a greater influence on my behavior? Do
inherited traits or life experiences play a greater role in shaping my personality?
The nature versus nurture debate is one of the oldest issues in psychology. The
debate centers on the relative contributions of genetic inheritance and
environmental factors to human development.
Some philosophers such as Plato and Descartes suggested that certain things are
inborn, or that they occur naturally regardless of environmental influences.
Nativists take the position that all or most behaviors and characteristics are the
result of inheritance.
Advocates of this point of view believe that all of our characteristics and behaviors
are the result of evolution. Genetic traits handed down from parents influence the
individual differences that make each person unique.
Other well-known thinkers such as John Locke believed in what is known as
tabula rasa, which suggests that the mind begins as a blank slate. According to this
notion, everything that we are and all of our knowledge is determined by our
experience.
Empiricists take the position that all or most behaviors and characteristics result
from learning. Behaviorism is a good example of a theory rooted in empiricism.
The behaviorists believe that all actions and behaviors are the results of
conditioning. Theorists such as John B. Watson believed that people could be
trained to do and become anything, regardless of their genetic background.
HOW NATURE AND NURTURE INTERACT
What researchers do know is that the interaction between heredity and environment
is often the most important factor of all. Kevin Davies of PBS's Nova described
one fascinating example of this phenomenon.
Perfect pitch is the ability to detect the pitch of a musical tone without any
reference. Researchers have found that this ability tends to run in families and
believe that it might be tied to a single gene. However, they've also discovered that
possessing the gene alone is not enough to develop this ability. Instead, musical
training during early childhood is necessary to allow this inherited ability to
manifest itself.
Height is another example of a trait that is influenced the interaction of nature and
nurture. A child might come from a family where everyone is tall, and he may have
inherited these genes for height. However, if he grows up in a deprived
environment where he does not receive proper nourishment, he might never attain
the height he might have he had grown up in a healthier environment.
CONTEMPORARY VIEWS OF NATURE VERSUS NURTURE
Throughout the history of psychology, however, this debate has continued to stir
up controversy. Eugenics, for example, was a movement heavily influenced by the
nativist approach. Psychologist Francis Galton, a cousin of the naturalist Charles
Darwin, coined both the terms nature versus nurture and eugenics, and believed
that intelligence was the result of genetics. Galton believed that intelligent
individuals should be encouraged to marry and have many children, while less
intelligent individuals should be discouraged from reproducing.
Today, the majority of experts believe that both nature and nurture influence
behavior and development. However, the issue still rages on in many areas such as
in the debate on the origins of homosexuality and influences on intelligence. While
few people take the extreme nativist or radical empiricist approach, researchers and
experts still debate the degree to which biology and environment influence
behavior.
Increasingly, people are beginning to realize that asking how much heredity or
environment influence a particular trait is not the right approach. The reality is that
there is not simple way to disentangle the multitude of forces that exist. These
influences include genetic factors that interact with one another, environmental
factors that interact such as social experiences and overall culture, as well as how
both hereditary and environmental influences intermingle. Instead, many
researchers today are interested in seeing how genes modulate environmental
influences and vice versa.
THE INFLUENCES OF NATURE AND NUTURE ON AS IT RELATES TO
MY DEVELOPMENT
Nature is responsible for the growth of a person from the fetus level until
development into a normal adult. The genetic makeup of a human being is
responsible for their sex, skin color, color of their eyes and hair as well as
distinguishing features which are inherited. For example in my family, we are
seven in number(3 boys and 4 girls). Both our parent are fair in complexion, and
this made all of us(me and my siblings) fair in complexion this is caused by nature.
Nature can only assist in the growth of a fetus into a normal well-developed adult
who may have inherited some special talents like in my family, my father did not
go to secondary school but he can read, write, transcode and assimilate English
words. This we all in my family inherited, myself and my siblings, we are all
intelligent, understands things easily retains alot. Thus it can be concluded that
nature uses the genetic coding to help in physical development and does impart
some positive or negative traits to an individual. However, it is nurture which can
be utilized to improve positive traits and diminish the effect of negative traits in a
child.
THE INFLUENCE OF GENES ON MY BEHAVIOR
The influence of genes on behavior has been well established in the scientific
community. To a large extent, who i am and how i behave is a result of my genetic
makeup. While genes do not determine behavior, they play a huge role in what we
I and why i do it. Let me use myself as an example, am a very shy, quiet, not too
friendly person from childhood and I know I inherited that from my father because
that is how he behaves. This really disturbed my life, am always loanly, not talking
to anybody, even when I see someone to talk to I don’t always know what to say.
But now the environment I later found myself in made me very out spoken and
rude.
Behavioral Genetics
Behavioral genetics studies heritability of behavioral traits, and it overlaps with
genetics, psychology, and ethology (the scientific study of human and animal
behavior). Genetics plays a large role in when and how learning, growing, and
development occurs. For example, although environment has an effect on the
walking behavior of infants and toddlers, children are unable to walk at all before
an age that is predetermined by their genome. However, while the genetic makeup
of a child determines the age range for when he or she will begin walking,
environmental influences determine how early or late within that range the event
will actually occur.
Classical Genetics
Classical, or Mendelian, genetics examines how genes are passed from one
generation to the next, as well as how the presence or absence of a gene can be
determined via sexual reproduction. Gregor Mendel is known as the father of the
field of genetics, and his work with plant hybridization (specifically pea plants)
demonstrated that certain traits follow particular patterns. This is referred to as the
law of Mendelian inheritance.
Gregor Mendel, the father of genetics
Mendel's work with pea plants demonstrated that certain traits follow particular
patterns.
Genes can be manipulated by selective breeding, which can have an enormous
impact on behavior. For example, some dogs are bred specifically to be obedient,
like golden retrievers; others are bred to be protective, like German shepards. In
another example, Seymour Benzer discovered he could breed certain fruit flies
with others to create distinct behavioral characteristics and change their circadian
rhythms.
Source: Boundless. “The Influence of Genes on Behavior.” Boundless Psychology.
Boundless, 20 Aug. 2015. Retrieved 04 Feb. 2016 from
https://www.boundless.com/psychology/textbooks/boundless-psychologytextbook/biological-foundations-of-psychology-3/genetics-and-behavior-31/theinfluence-of-genes-on-behavior-137-12672/
REFERENCES
Bandura, A. Ross, D., & Ross, S. A. (1961). Transmission of aggression through the imitation of aggressive models. Journal of
Abnormal and Social Psychology, 63, 575-582.
Chomsky, N. (1965). Aspects of the Theory of Syntax. MIT Press.
Davies, K. (2001). Nature vs. nurture revisited. NOVA. Retrieved from http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/body/nature-versusnurture-revisited.html
Galton, F. (1874). On men of science, their nature and their nurture. Proceedings of the Royal Institution of Great Britain, 7, 227236.
Galton, F. (1883). Inquiries into Human Faculty and Its Development. London: Macmillan.
Watson, J. B. (1930). Behaviorism. New Brunswick, New Jersey: Transaction Publishers.