* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download The nature versus nurture debate is one of the
Theory of reasoned action wikipedia , lookup
Developmental psychology wikipedia , lookup
Theory of planned behavior wikipedia , lookup
Behavior analysis of child development wikipedia , lookup
Music psychology wikipedia , lookup
Inclusive fitness in humans wikipedia , lookup
Human nature wikipedia , lookup
Cross-cultural psychology wikipedia , lookup
Personality psychology wikipedia , lookup
Abnormal psychology wikipedia , lookup
Subfields of psychology wikipedia , lookup
Social psychology wikipedia , lookup
Ecospirituality wikipedia , lookup
Behaviorism wikipedia , lookup
Thin-slicing wikipedia , lookup
Psychological behaviorism wikipedia , lookup
Social perception wikipedia , lookup
Behavioral modernity wikipedia , lookup
Attribution (psychology) wikipedia , lookup
Conservation psychology wikipedia , lookup
NATURE-NURTURE CONTROVERSY AS IT RELATES TO ME AND MY CAREER The nature versus nurture debate is one of the oldest philosophical issues within psychology. So what exactly is the nature versus nurture debate all about? Nature refers to all of the genes and hereditary factors that influence who we are – from our physical appearance to our personality characteristics. Nurture refers to all the environmental variables that impact who we are, including our early childhood experiences, how we were raised, our social relationships, and our surrounding culture. Even today, different branches of psychology often take a one versus the other approach. For example, biological psychology tends to stress the importance of genetics and biological influences. Behaviorism, on the other hand, focuses on the impact that the environment has on behavior. A CLOSER LOOK AT THE NATURE VS. NURTURE DEBATE Do genetic or environmental factors have a greater influence on my behavior? Do inherited traits or life experiences play a greater role in shaping my personality? The nature versus nurture debate is one of the oldest issues in psychology. The debate centers on the relative contributions of genetic inheritance and environmental factors to human development. Some philosophers such as Plato and Descartes suggested that certain things are inborn, or that they occur naturally regardless of environmental influences. Nativists take the position that all or most behaviors and characteristics are the result of inheritance. Advocates of this point of view believe that all of our characteristics and behaviors are the result of evolution. Genetic traits handed down from parents influence the individual differences that make each person unique. Other well-known thinkers such as John Locke believed in what is known as tabula rasa, which suggests that the mind begins as a blank slate. According to this notion, everything that we are and all of our knowledge is determined by our experience. Empiricists take the position that all or most behaviors and characteristics result from learning. Behaviorism is a good example of a theory rooted in empiricism. The behaviorists believe that all actions and behaviors are the results of conditioning. Theorists such as John B. Watson believed that people could be trained to do and become anything, regardless of their genetic background. HOW NATURE AND NURTURE INTERACT What researchers do know is that the interaction between heredity and environment is often the most important factor of all. Kevin Davies of PBS's Nova described one fascinating example of this phenomenon. Perfect pitch is the ability to detect the pitch of a musical tone without any reference. Researchers have found that this ability tends to run in families and believe that it might be tied to a single gene. However, they've also discovered that possessing the gene alone is not enough to develop this ability. Instead, musical training during early childhood is necessary to allow this inherited ability to manifest itself. Height is another example of a trait that is influenced the interaction of nature and nurture. A child might come from a family where everyone is tall, and he may have inherited these genes for height. However, if he grows up in a deprived environment where he does not receive proper nourishment, he might never attain the height he might have he had grown up in a healthier environment. CONTEMPORARY VIEWS OF NATURE VERSUS NURTURE Throughout the history of psychology, however, this debate has continued to stir up controversy. Eugenics, for example, was a movement heavily influenced by the nativist approach. Psychologist Francis Galton, a cousin of the naturalist Charles Darwin, coined both the terms nature versus nurture and eugenics, and believed that intelligence was the result of genetics. Galton believed that intelligent individuals should be encouraged to marry and have many children, while less intelligent individuals should be discouraged from reproducing. Today, the majority of experts believe that both nature and nurture influence behavior and development. However, the issue still rages on in many areas such as in the debate on the origins of homosexuality and influences on intelligence. While few people take the extreme nativist or radical empiricist approach, researchers and experts still debate the degree to which biology and environment influence behavior. Increasingly, people are beginning to realize that asking how much heredity or environment influence a particular trait is not the right approach. The reality is that there is not simple way to disentangle the multitude of forces that exist. These influences include genetic factors that interact with one another, environmental factors that interact such as social experiences and overall culture, as well as how both hereditary and environmental influences intermingle. Instead, many researchers today are interested in seeing how genes modulate environmental influences and vice versa. THE INFLUENCES OF NATURE AND NUTURE ON AS IT RELATES TO MY DEVELOPMENT Nature is responsible for the growth of a person from the fetus level until development into a normal adult. The genetic makeup of a human being is responsible for their sex, skin color, color of their eyes and hair as well as distinguishing features which are inherited. For example in my family, we are seven in number(3 boys and 4 girls). Both our parent are fair in complexion, and this made all of us(me and my siblings) fair in complexion this is caused by nature. Nature can only assist in the growth of a fetus into a normal well-developed adult who may have inherited some special talents like in my family, my father did not go to secondary school but he can read, write, transcode and assimilate English words. This we all in my family inherited, myself and my siblings, we are all intelligent, understands things easily retains alot. Thus it can be concluded that nature uses the genetic coding to help in physical development and does impart some positive or negative traits to an individual. However, it is nurture which can be utilized to improve positive traits and diminish the effect of negative traits in a child. THE INFLUENCE OF GENES ON MY BEHAVIOR The influence of genes on behavior has been well established in the scientific community. To a large extent, who i am and how i behave is a result of my genetic makeup. While genes do not determine behavior, they play a huge role in what we I and why i do it. Let me use myself as an example, am a very shy, quiet, not too friendly person from childhood and I know I inherited that from my father because that is how he behaves. This really disturbed my life, am always loanly, not talking to anybody, even when I see someone to talk to I don’t always know what to say. But now the environment I later found myself in made me very out spoken and rude. Behavioral Genetics Behavioral genetics studies heritability of behavioral traits, and it overlaps with genetics, psychology, and ethology (the scientific study of human and animal behavior). Genetics plays a large role in when and how learning, growing, and development occurs. For example, although environment has an effect on the walking behavior of infants and toddlers, children are unable to walk at all before an age that is predetermined by their genome. However, while the genetic makeup of a child determines the age range for when he or she will begin walking, environmental influences determine how early or late within that range the event will actually occur. Classical Genetics Classical, or Mendelian, genetics examines how genes are passed from one generation to the next, as well as how the presence or absence of a gene can be determined via sexual reproduction. Gregor Mendel is known as the father of the field of genetics, and his work with plant hybridization (specifically pea plants) demonstrated that certain traits follow particular patterns. This is referred to as the law of Mendelian inheritance. Gregor Mendel, the father of genetics Mendel's work with pea plants demonstrated that certain traits follow particular patterns. Genes can be manipulated by selective breeding, which can have an enormous impact on behavior. For example, some dogs are bred specifically to be obedient, like golden retrievers; others are bred to be protective, like German shepards. In another example, Seymour Benzer discovered he could breed certain fruit flies with others to create distinct behavioral characteristics and change their circadian rhythms. Source: Boundless. “The Influence of Genes on Behavior.” Boundless Psychology. Boundless, 20 Aug. 2015. Retrieved 04 Feb. 2016 from https://www.boundless.com/psychology/textbooks/boundless-psychologytextbook/biological-foundations-of-psychology-3/genetics-and-behavior-31/theinfluence-of-genes-on-behavior-137-12672/ REFERENCES Bandura, A. Ross, D., & Ross, S. A. (1961). Transmission of aggression through the imitation of aggressive models. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 63, 575-582. Chomsky, N. (1965). Aspects of the Theory of Syntax. MIT Press. Davies, K. (2001). Nature vs. nurture revisited. NOVA. Retrieved from http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/body/nature-versusnurture-revisited.html Galton, F. (1874). On men of science, their nature and their nurture. Proceedings of the Royal Institution of Great Britain, 7, 227236. Galton, F. (1883). Inquiries into Human Faculty and Its Development. London: Macmillan. Watson, J. B. (1930). Behaviorism. New Brunswick, New Jersey: Transaction Publishers.