* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download 17 Feb 2007
Mitigation of global warming in Australia wikipedia , lookup
Hotspot Ecosystem Research and Man's Impact On European Seas wikipedia , lookup
Climate change denial wikipedia , lookup
Solar radiation management wikipedia , lookup
Effects of global warming on humans wikipedia , lookup
Climate sensitivity wikipedia , lookup
Climate change in Tuvalu wikipedia , lookup
General circulation model wikipedia , lookup
Michael E. Mann wikipedia , lookup
Climatic Research Unit email controversy wikipedia , lookup
Soon and Baliunas controversy wikipedia , lookup
Climate change, industry and society wikipedia , lookup
Hockey stick controversy wikipedia , lookup
Media coverage of global warming wikipedia , lookup
Attribution of recent climate change wikipedia , lookup
Politics of global warming wikipedia , lookup
Effects of global warming wikipedia , lookup
Fred Singer wikipedia , lookup
Effects of global warming on oceans wikipedia , lookup
Wegman Report wikipedia , lookup
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change wikipedia , lookup
Global warming controversy wikipedia , lookup
Instrumental temperature record wikipedia , lookup
Surveys of scientists' views on climate change wikipedia , lookup
Years of Living Dangerously wikipedia , lookup
Global warming wikipedia , lookup
Public opinion on global warming wikipedia , lookup
Climate change in the Arctic wikipedia , lookup
Effects of global warming on Australia wikipedia , lookup
Scientific opinion on climate change wikipedia , lookup
Climatic Research Unit documents wikipedia , lookup
North Report wikipedia , lookup
Global warming hiatus wikipedia , lookup
Climate change feedback wikipedia , lookup
Criticism of the IPCC Fourth Assessment Report wikipedia , lookup
MODERN TIMES Art Hobson [email protected] NWA Times 17 Feb 2007 Global Warming: A Dose of Reality One reason I elected to become a scientist is that it seemed to me that scientists are in the reality business. Richard Alley, a lead author of the 2007 Fourth Assessment Report of the U.N.’s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), Professor of Geosciences at Penn State University, and author of a wonderful read titled “The Two-Mile Time Machine: Ice Cores, Abrupt Climate Change, and Our Future,” is one such scientist. His comment to public servants and citizens about the IPCC’s work is, “Policy makers paid us to do good science, and now we have high very scientific confidence in this work—this is real, this is real, this is real. So now act, the ball’s back in your court.” Unlike those who believe for religious, ideological, or other reasons that they possess the absolute truth revealed directly to them by some higher authority, scientists are never absolutely certain of their conclusions. And yet, there is no longer a reasonable doubt that human activities are warming the planet at a dangerous rate. This proposition is sufficiently certain--“very likely” according to the report--that it would be decidedly foolish not to act on it. The Fourth Assessment might be the most comprehensive scientific report ever issued on any topic. Written over a six-year period, it’s the most recent of four IPCC reports. It’s an assessment of the work of many thousands of scientists appearing in hundreds of scientific journals worldwide. Over 1200 scientists and 2500 expert scientific reviewers summarized this work in the IPCC report. The full report will be published during 2007 in four sections dealing with (1) the scientific basis, (2) its consequences, (3) options for slowing the trend, and (4) a final synthesis report. The report’s conclusions are conservative, for at least four reasons: science is always conservative because scientists hate to be wrong and they love to spot the errors of other scientists; every word of the report had to be agreed to by the IPCC’s 130 participating governments; the IPCC is prohibited by its charter from entering into speculation; and only scientific results through 2005 were accepted. This document represents, for sure, the scientific consensus. The 21-page “Summary For Policymakers” of the scientific basis, drafted by 51 scientists including people like Alley and Susan Solomon, co-discoverer of the Antarctic ozone hole and co-originator of the chemical theory that correctly explains the hole, is available at http://www.ipcc.ch/. It’s written in English that everyone can read. For convincing confirmation that humans have significantly changed the atmosphere, consider Figure 1 in the Summary. It shows atmospheric concentrations of carbon dioxide and two other global warming pollutants, during the past 10,000 years. All three graphs remain at relatively unchanging levels right up until 150 years ago, when they zoom upward to radically higher levels that are unprecedented in at least 650,000 years. Other conclusions: Global average temperatures rose 1 degree Fahrenheit during the past century and will rise another 2 to 11 degrees this century, with Arctic temperatures rising by twice these amounts, if we don’t severely reduce our emissions of global warming pollution. Temperatures during the past 50 years were the highest they’ve been in at least 1300 years. Eleven of the past 12 years have been among the 12 warmest since instruments began recording temperatures in 1850. Extreme weather (hot days and nights, heat waves, hurricanes, heavy precipitation, drying, droughts) has increased and will continue increasing. Permafrost and seasonally frozen ground has significantly decreased and will continue decreasing. Mountain glaciers, snow pack, and snow cover have declined and will continue declining. Summertime Arctic sea ice extent has decreased by over 20 percent and will decline until the Arctic ice cap disappears almost entirely later in this century. Fresh meltwater pouring into the Atlantic will cause the gulf stream to slow, affecting global ocean flows, but this will not cause the feared sudden cooling of Europe because global warming will dominate over any cooling effects. Oceans rose 7 inches during the past century because of melting mountain glaciers, thermal expansion of seawater due to warming, and ice losses from the Greenland and Antarctic ice sheets. Due only to mountain glaciers and thermal expansion, oceans will rise an additional foot during this century. But one foot could be a big underestimate, because although the Greenland and West Antarctic ice sheets are showing signs of instability and rapid sliding toward the sea, these phenomena were deemed too recent and too uncertain to be included in the report. Going somewhat beyond the conservative IPCC conclusions, many scientists believe that we have as little as ten years left before setting the great ice sheets of Greenland and West Antarctica on an irreversible path toward complete melting or sliding into the sea, a long-term process that would eventually raise sea levels by 23 feet if the Greenland ice sheet alone vanishes (this happened during the previous “interglacial period” 125,000 years ago when global temperatures were only about 4 degrees above present levels). “Irreversible” means that feedbacks inherent within the climate system will inexorably melt these ice sheets, regardless of how humans may manage to limit or reverse the increasing concentration of global warming gases in the atmosphere. Present and future global warming pollution will continue contributing to warming and sea level rise for more than 1000 years, due to the time required for removal of these gases from the atmosphere. Where will this leave our grandchildren? As the planet warms, let’s hope America’s political will rises faster than the temperature readings.