* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download AFD project - Averof Lab
Survey
Document related concepts
Extracellular matrix wikipedia , lookup
Cell growth wikipedia , lookup
Tissue engineering wikipedia , lookup
Organ-on-a-chip wikipedia , lookup
Cell encapsulation wikipedia , lookup
Cell culture wikipedia , lookup
Hedgehog signaling pathway wikipedia , lookup
List of types of proteins wikipedia , lookup
Transcriptional regulation wikipedia , lookup
Epigenetics in stem-cell differentiation wikipedia , lookup
Transcript
Overexpression of Drosophila Nanog homolog creates giants Sonata Kirk1*+ and Kin Ti Sandstone1*+ N ANOG is thought to be a key factor in maintaining pluripotency in embryonic stem cells (ESCs). Its concerted expression with other factors such as POU5F1 and SOX2 promotes ESC identity. These factors offer an important area of study because of their ability to establish and maintain pluripotency. ESCs have the ability to produce virtually any cell type of all three germ layers (endoderm, ectoderm, mesoderm). It is for this reason that understanding the mechanisms that maintain a cell's pluripotency is critical for researchers to understand how stem cells work; and may lead to future advances in treating degenerative disease. The lack of a Nanog homolog in Drosophila and C. elegans was long thought to be the result of evolutionary changes in pluripotency maintenance mechanisms and/or the divergence of the factors involved. The fact that the development of Drosophila and C. elegans also does not involve the blastocyst stage, a development stage found mainly in mammals, corroborated this hypothesis. We have identified the Drosophila homolog of the mammalian nanog gene and overexpressed it in a conditionally active Notch background during the prepupal stage. Adult flies have a significantly larger trunk and somatic features never seen before. These flies are amenable to husbandry and can be kept in stock as usual. Thus, we propose that this might be indirect evidence for the existence of gigantic creatures as described in Greek mythology. Coordinated transcription factor networks have emerged as the master regulatory mechanisms of stem cell pluripotency and differentiation. Many stem cell-specific transcription factors, including the pluripotency transcription factors, OCT4, NANOG, and SOX2 function in combinatorial complexes to regulate the expression of loci, which are involved in embryonic stem (ES) cell pluripotency and cellular differentiation (1, 4). In mammals, embryonic stem cells are able to differentiate and give rise to derivatives of the three germinal layers (ectoderm, endoderm, and mesoderm) and functional gametes (3). This property of cells is referred to as pluripotency. The pluripotent status of preimplantation embryo cells and embryonic stem cells is maintained by a complicated system of molecular signaling pathways and transcription factors. The key regulators in this system are the transcription factors OCT4 and NANOG (2,6). We sought to determine what the absence of Nanog in Drosophila meant. Therefore, we looked thoroughly into the genome of the fly trying to identify alternative genes that could potentially play Nanog’s role. To our surprise, we were able to match a previously uncharacterized gene (CG10411) to Nanog with an expected value lower than 10-5 (see Supplementary Material). In situ hybridizations and luciferase assays confirmed that the aforementioned gene corresponded to a Drosophila Nanog homolog (data not shown). However, overexpression and knock-down studies failed to reveal any detectable phenotype. Since Notch is well known for its leading role in practically every biological process, from lateral inhibition to maintenance of pluripotency in specific cell types, we decided to conditionally overexpress both of the “N” genes at the prepupal stage, which is associated with the peak of pluripotent cell number in Drosophila. The result was beyond any imagination (Figure 1). Adult flies were ridiculously large. Their trunk was approximately 5 times bigger than a wild type Drosophila and their dorsal bristles were significantly enlarged. The plumose (feathery) arista, the bristling of the head and thorax, as well as the wing venation were identical to that of the wild types, but scaled up in size. Furthermore, it came as a surprise that we were actually capable of crossing the mutant flies to wild type ones and getting fertile and viable progeny. Our findings clearly suggest a path for the single step production of giants, forcibly questioning the gradual evolution theory and evoking that Greek mythology might be far away from only myths. References and Notes 1. S. Kirk, K.T. Sandstone. Nature 121, 647 (2009). 2. S. Kirk. Development 22, 185 (2011). 3. U.L. Salvo et al. PNAS 102, 7888 (2005) 4. F. Chivalries et al. Curr Biol 20, 757 (1993) 5. Materials and methods are available as supporting material on Science Online. 6. K.T. Sandstone. PLoS One 634, 1888 (2010). 7. We thank Foam Chivalries for granting us lab space for our experiments. We would also like to thank members of the Chivalries and Las Kiddie labs for useful discussions. We finally thank Ali Task and Sou Bassi for suggestions and critical reading of the manuscript. This research was funded by a Father Bank grant to KTS and by a NMAA scholarship to SK. Supporting Online Material Fig. 1. Double “N” mutant exhibiting the gigantic phenotype. Such individuals can reach a body length of 15mm. Black arrows depict the Notch dependent wing phenotype. Despite their size, weight and the Notch phenotype, these flies are outstanding flyers. Red arrow indicates WT Drosophila. Photos in scale. 104! ! ! 01 APRIL 2011! VOL 333! SCIENCE! www.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/full/333/20/104/DC2 Materials and Methods SOM text Figs. S1 to S5 Tables S1 to S3 References 28 December 2010; accepted 14 March 2011 10.1127/science.1199683 1 KoKogene Center, Institute of Amazing Research (IAR), Down That Road, Massachusetts 10411, United States of America. * These authors contributed equally to this work. +To whom correspondence should be addressed. E - m a i l : s o n a t a . k i r k @ k k c . i a r. u s ( S K ) ; [email protected] (KTS). www.sciencemag.org Downloaded from www.sciencemag.org on April 01, 2011 BREVIA