* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download Social Psychology 11 Jan 13
Survey
Document related concepts
Carolyn Sherif wikipedia , lookup
Social loafing wikipedia , lookup
Group polarization wikipedia , lookup
Attitude (psychology) wikipedia , lookup
Belongingness wikipedia , lookup
In-group favoritism wikipedia , lookup
Self-categorization theory wikipedia , lookup
Social dilemma wikipedia , lookup
Communication in small groups wikipedia , lookup
Albert Bandura wikipedia , lookup
False consensus effect wikipedia , lookup
Attitude change wikipedia , lookup
Social tuning wikipedia , lookup
Transcript
Social Psychology The way we perceive ourselves in relation to the rest of the world plays an important role in our choices, behaviors and beliefs. Conversely, the opinions of others also impact our behavior and the way we view ourselves. Social psychology is a branch of psychology concerned with how social phenomena influence us and how people interact with others Understanding social psychology can be useful for many reasons. First, we can better understand how groups impact our choices and actions. Additionally, it also allows us to gain a greater appreciation for how our social perceptions affect our interactions with other people. Outcomes. describe the basic human need for interaction with others: Are we really social beings? discuss the ways individuals form impressions of one another. Stereotypes and Attraction. describe the interactive patterns with groups: Conformity Vs. Standing out. cite the sources of attitude change describe prejudice and its relationship to stereotypes and roles Big Questions Are we inherently good or evil? Are you praised or disciplined more often? Is it easier to find faults or gifts in people? Do you think selfishness is the root cause of evil? Why is it so hard to get along with people? Why is doing the right thing more difficult? Social psychology is about understanding individual behavior in a social context. Baron, Byrne & Suls (1989) define social psychology as .......- “the scientific field that seeks to understand the nature and causes of individual behavior in social situations”. (p. 6). It therefore looks at human behavior as influenced by other people and the social context in which this occurs. Social psychologists therefore deal with the factors that lead us to behave in a given way in the presence of others, and look at the conditions under which certain behavior/actions and feelings occur. Social psychology is to do with the way these feelings, thoughts, beliefs, intentions and goals are constructed and how such psychological factors, in turn, influence our interactions with others. Topics examined in social psychology include: the self concept, social cognition, attribution theory, social influence, group processes, prejudice and discrimination, interpersonal processes, aggression, attitudes and stereotypes. Basic Aspects of Social Behavior There are some basic aspects of social behavior that play a large role in our actions and how we see ourselves. Social behavior is goal-oriented. Our interactions serve goals or fulfill needs. Some common goals or needs include the need for social ties, the desire to understand ourselves and others, the wish to gain or maintain status or protection and the need to attract companions. The interaction between the individual and the situation helps determine the outcome. In many instances, people behave very differently depending upon the situation. Environmental and situational variables play an important role and have a strong influence on our behavior. People spend a great deal of time considering social situations. Our social interactions help form our self-concept and perception. One method of forming self-concept is through the reflected appraisal process in which we imagine how other people see us. Another method is through the social comparison process whereby we consider how we compare to other people in our peer group. We also analyze and explain the behavior of those around us. One common phenomenon is the expectation confirmation, where we tend to ignore unexpected attributes and look for evidence that confirms our preexisting beliefs about others. This helps simplify our worldview, but it also skews our perception and can contribute to stereotyping. We often believe that a person's behavior is a good indicator of their personality. Another influence on our perceptions of other people can be explained by the theory of correspondent inferences. This occurs when we infer that the actions and behaviors of others correspond to their intentions and personalities. While behavior can be informative in some instances, especially when the person's actions are intentional, it can also be misleading. If we have limited interaction with someone, the behavior we see may be atypical or caused by the specific situation rather than by the persons overriding dispositional characteristics. Key Research Much of the key research in social psychology developed following World War II, when people became interested in the behavior of individuals when grouped together and in social situations. Key studies were carried out in several areas. Some studies focused on how attitudes are formed, changed by the social context and measured to ascertain whether change has occurred. Amongst some of the most famous work in social psychology is that on obedience conducted by Milgram in his “electric shock” study, which looked at the role an authority figure plays in shaping behavior. Similarly, Zimbardo’s prison simulation notably demonstrated conformity to given roles in the social world. Wider topics then began to emerge, such as social perception, aggression, relationships, decision making, prosocial behavior and attribution, many of which are central to today’s topics and will be discussed throughout this website. Thus the growth years for social psychology occurred during the decades following the 1940s. Famous Experiments Allport (1920) – Social Facilitation: Allport introduced the notion that the presence of others (the social group) can facilitate certain behavior. It was found that an audience would improve an actors’ performance in well learned/easy tasks, but lead to a decrease in performance on newly learned/difficult tasks due to social inhibition. Bandura (1963) – Social Learning Theory: Bandura introduced the notion that behavior in the social world could be modeled. Three groups of children watched a video where an adult was aggressive towards a ‘bobo doll’, and the adult was either just seen to be doing this, was rewarded by another adult for their behavior or were punished for it. Children who had seen the adult rewarded were found to be more likely to copy such behavior. Dissonance, Attribution and Identity Festinger (1950) – Cognitive Dissonance Festinger, Schacter and Black brought the idea that when we hold beliefs, attitudes or cognitions which are different, then we experience dissonance – this is an inconsistency that causes discomfort. We are motivated to reduce this by either changing one of our thoughts, beliefs or attitudes or selectively attending to information which supports one of our beliefs and ignores the other (selective exposure hypothesis). Dissonance occurs when there are difficult choices or decisions, or when people participate in behavior that is contrary to their attitude. Dissonance is thus brought about by effort justification (when aiming to reach a modest goal), induced compliance (when people are forced to comply contrary to their attitude) and free choice (when weighing up decisions). Tajfel (1971) – Social Identity Theory: When divided into artificial (minimal) groups, prejudice results simply from the awareness that there is an “out-group” (the other group). When boys were asked to allocate points to others (which might be converted to rewards) who were either part of their own group or the out-group, they displayed a strong in-group preference. That is, they allocated more points on the set task to boys who they believed to be in the same group as themselves. This can be accounted for by Tajfel & Turner’s social identity theory, which states that individuals need to maintain a positive sense of personal and social identity: this is partly achieved by emphasizing the desirability of one’s own group, focusing on distinctions between other “lesser” groups. Weiner (1986) – Attribution theory: Weiner was interested in the attributions made for experiences of success and failure and introduced the idea that we look for explanations of behavior in the social world. He believed that these were made based on three areas: locus, which could be internal or external; stability, which is whether the cause is stable or changes over time: and controllability. Social Influence Milgram (1963) – Shock Experiment: Participants were told that they were taking part in a study on learning, but always acted as the teacher when they were then responsible for going over paired associate learning tasks. When the learner (a stooge) got the answer wrong, they were told by a scientist that they had to deliver an electric shock. This did not actually happen, although the participant was unaware of this as they had themselves a sample (real!) shock at the start of the experiment. They were encouraged to increase the voltage given after each incorrect answer up to a maximum voltage, and it was found that all participants gave shocks up to 300v, with 65 per cent reaching the highest level of 450v. Haney, Banks, Zimbardo (1973) – Prison Study: Volunteers took part in a simulation where they were randomly assigned the role of a prisoner or guard and taken to a converted university basement resembling a prison environment. There was some basic loss of rights for the prisoners, who were unexpectedly arrested, given a uniform and an identification number (they were therefore deindividuated). It seems that obedience is most likely to occur in an unfamiliar environment and in the presence of an authority figure, especially when covert pressure is put upon people to obey. It is also possible that it occurs because the participant felt that someone other than themselves was responsible for their actions. The study showed that conformity to social roles occurred as part of the social interaction, as both groups displayed more negative emotions and hostility and dehumanization became apparent. Prisoners became passive, whilst the guards assumed an active, brutal and dominant role. Although normative and informational social influence had a role to play here, deindividuation/the loss of a sense of identity seemed most likely to lead to conformity. Both this and Milgram’s study introduced the notion of social influence, and the ways in which this could be observed/tested. Factors Increasing Conformity Size of the Group Conformity tends to increase as the size of the group increases. However, there is little change in conformity once the group size reaches 4-5. With one other person (i.e. confederate) in the group conformity was 3%, with two others it increased to 13% and with three or more it was 32% (or 1/3). Because conformity does not seem to increase in groups larger than four, this is considered the optimal group size. Difficulty of Task When the (comparison) lines (e.g. A, B, C) were made more similar in length it was harder to judge the correct answer and conformity increased. When we are uncertain, it seems we look to others for confirmation. The more difficult the task the greater the conformity. Status of Majority Group If someone is of high status (e.g. your boss) or has a lot of knowledge (e.g. your teacher), they might be more influential, and so people will conform to their opinions more (e.g. informational influence). The higher the status of the group the higher the level of conformity. Conformity//Group Behavior Conformity is a type of social influence involving a change in belief or behavior in order to fit in with a group. This change is in response to real (involving the physical presence of others) or imagined (involving the pressure of social norms / expectations) group pressure. Factors Decreasing Conformity Social Support When one other person in the group gave a different answer from the others, and the group answer was not unanimous, conformity dropped. Asch (1951) found that even the presence of just one confederate that goes against the majority choice can reduce conformity as much as 80%. This suggests that individuals conform because they are concerned about what other people think of them (i.e. normative influence). Answer in Private When participants were allowed to answer in private (so the rest of the group do not know their response) conformity decreases. This is because there is less groups pressure and normative influence is not as powerful, as there is no fear of rejection from the group. Group Conformity Asch http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NyDDyT1lDhA Brown Eyes Vs. Blue Eyes http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VeK759FF84s Roles Role theory argues that human behavior is guided by expectations held both by the individual and by others in the community. A role is a set of rules or norms that function as plans or blueprints to guide behavior within a particular society. IE: husbands have roles, wives have roles, we use these to guide our behavior. Roles can be occupational or relational. An occupational role relates to a person's individual function (for example, a profession). A relational role governs how the individual behaves towards others (for example, being a father or a boss). Role theory is structural functionalist in that it seeks to explain human behavior by looking at what social function is fulfilled by holding a given role. Role theory suggests that a substantial proportion of observable, day-to-day behavior is simply people carrying out roles and negotiating which role to prioritize. Once you understand someone’s role and which of their many roles they are prioritizing, you can predict how they are going to behave. Examples of roles include father, mother, son, brother, sister, friend, girlfriend, boss, CEO, employee, and secretary. All of these "titles" incorporate social and individual expectations for behavior. Questions How does social media, online relationships and virtual worlds allow us to change roles? In the real world, how do we transition between roles? What happens when we fail to transition between roles? Social Development Adolescents ponder "Who am I and what can I be?", marking adolescence with a stage of development known as identity vs. role confusion. According to Erikson's psychosocial theory of development, adolescence (ages 13-19 years) is the fifth stage of development known as identity vs. role confusion. In this stage, the adolescent is consumed by the existential question, "Who am I and what can I be?" and is newly concerned with how they appear to others. Initially, they are apt to experience some role confusion—mixed ideas and feelings about the specific ways in which they will fit into society—and may experiment with a variety of behaviors and activities. During this time, conflicts and confusion regarding religious, political, and sexual identities are common, along with decisions about career choice. According to Erikson, adolescents who are allowed the space and time to explore various possibilities are able to establish a clear sense of identity and self-awareness. Social Identity Do we put too much pressure on students to find their role and identity in High School? Where does your identity come from? Where should your identity come from? Who are you when no one else is around? Is this the real you? If not, when are you, you? Attitudes An attitude is a hypothetical construct that represents an individual's degree of like or dislike for something. Attitudes are generally positive or negative views of a person, place, thing, or event. This is often referred to as the attitude object. People can also be conflicted or ambivalent toward an object, meaning that they simultaneously possess both positive and negative attitudes toward the item in question. An attitude is a hypothetical construct that represents an individual's degree of like or dislike for something. Attitudes develop when our beliefs influence our feelings. Believing that someone is unfriendly, for instance, may cause us to dislike someone and act unfriendly. Attitude a positive or negative evaluation of people, objects, events, or ideas in one's environment Implicit Attitude The positive or negative thoughts, feelings, or actions towards objects which arise due to past experiences which one is either unaware of or which one cannot attribute to an identified previous experience. Explicit attitudes are attitudes that an individual is aware of and can explain. Cognitive Dissonance A conflict or anxiety resulting from inconsistencies between one's beliefs and one's actions or other beliefs. How Attitudes Form Unlike personality, attitudes are expected to change as a function of experience. In addition, exposure to the 'attitude' objects may have an effect on how a person forms his or her attitude. Attitudes are formed from direct contact, direct instruction, interaction with others, and observational learning. What’s an important attitude that you’ve seen change in your life recently? Changing attitudes. Attitudes are also not as stable as may commonly be believed. For example, if someone has the attitude that smoking is unhealthy but often smokes, then they will mostly likely change their attitude about smoking instead of changing their behaviors. One reason for this change is because it is very difficult to quit smoking, and it is much easier to simply change your beliefs about smoking. Another reason for this change is due to an effect called cognitive dissonance. Cognitive dissonance occurs when there is an imbalance between attitudes or behaviors. Dissonance is experienced as a sort of mental discomfort over this internal conflict, and needs to be resolved for this discomfort to go away. Because the fastest way to resolve this type of imbalance is by changing an attitude, our attitudes are often changed to resolve cognitive dissonance. Effects of Group Size on Attitudes and Behavior Size (number of people involved) is an important characteristic of groups, organizations and communities in which social behavior occurs. A social group has been defined as two or more humans who interact with one another, share similar characteristics and collectively have a sense of unity. Groups can be categorized according to size. Individual behavior has been shown to be influenced by the presence of others. For example, an individual’s performance at work or the individual’s decision-making processes (as in the term "groupthink"). Dyads and triads are the smallest social groups. Social interaction in a dyad is typically more intense because neither member shares the other's attention with anyone else. A triad is more stable because one member can act as a mediator if the relationship between the other two become strained. Group Growth. As an organization or community grows in size it is apt to experience changes in the way it operates. As the size of a group increases, the need for more organization or leadership also becomes more obvious. German sociologist Georg Simmel argued that as the group becomes greater, the individual becomes separated and grows more alone, isolated and segmented. Social Group A collection of humans or animals that share certain characteristics, interact with one another, accept expectations and obligations as members of the group, and share a common identity. Imagine your nuclear family as an example of a small, cohesive group. All members are invested in one another and remain committed to achieving the group's goals. On the other hand, a country is an example of a large group. Americans are united by nationality, but there is wide variation in how individual members seek to achieve goals and determine what the nation's goals should be. Groups Can Strengthen Extreme Opinions Group polarization is the phenomenon that when placed in group situations, people will make decisions and form opinions to more of an extreme than when alone. The phenomenon has shown that after participating in a discussion group, members tend to advocate more extreme positions and call for riskier courses of action than individuals who did not participate in any such discussion.The notion that the gap between initial differences within a group interaction widens over time is known as group polarization. Group polarization can have positive effects, such as increased awareness, but it may also have negative effects, such as increased prejudice. When like-minded individuals form groups and are isolated together, away from outside influences, their mentality becomes more extreme. Psychologists have found this to be true for terrorist organizations, in which extreme views are usually developed over time. The Internet also provides enough social isolation for a group to polarize viewpoints, such as when websites foster white supremacy. Isolated groups may also experience groupthink. Groupthink refers to a phenomenon where an isolated group pressured to make a decision agrees on a more extreme or less practical outcome due to in-group and out-group pressures. Vocab Group Polarization The tendency for groups to make decisions that are more extreme than the initial inclination of its members. Social Isolation A complete or near-complete lack of contact with society for members of a social species. Groupthink psychological phenomenon in which people strive for consensus within a group. In many cases, people will set aside their own personal beliefs or adopt the opinion of the rest of the group. People who are opposed to the decisions or overriding opinion of the group as a whole frequently remain quiet, preferring to keeping the peace rather than disrupt the uniformity of the crowd.. When surrounded by support for a specific position with few to no dissenters, it becomes likely that a group's opinion will tend to the extreme. How does the Internet lead to Group Polarization? In a study conducted by Sia et al. in 2002, group polarization was found to occur with online (computer-mediated) discussions. In particular, this study found that group discussions conducted when discussants are in a distributed (cannot see one another) or anonymous (cannot identify one another) environment, the level of group polarization tends to be higher in comparison to traditional meetings. This is attributed to the greater numbers of novel arguments generated (due to persuasive arguments theory) and the higher incidence of one-upmanship behaviors (due to social comparison). Questions What purpose do groups play in our social circles? What benefit do we receive from groups? What purpose do groups play in our society? Examining Confirmation Bias Confirmation bias is the tendency to selectively seek information which supports our beliefs and disregard information to the contrary. Confirmation bias can contribute to people possessing an overconfidence in their personal beliefs. Confirmation bias can also maintain or strengthen beliefs in the face of contrary evidence. Some psychologists use "confirmation bias" to refer to any way that people avoid rejecting a belief, whether in searching for evidence, interpreting it, or recalling it from memory. Experiments have repeatedly found that people tend to test hypotheses in a one-sided way by searching for evidence consistent with the hypothesis they hold at a given time. Rather than searching through all relevant evidence, they ask questions that are phrased so that an affirmative answer supports their hypothesis. They look for the consequences that they would expect if their hypothesis were true, rather than what would happen if it were false. Confirmation Bias In social psychology, this refers to the tendency of people to favor information that confirms their beliefs or hypotheses and minimizes evidence to the contrary. Illusory Correlation The phenomenon of seeing the relationship one expects in a set of data even when no such relationship exists. Attitude Polarization A phenomenon in which a disagreement becomes more extreme as the different parties consider evidence on the issue. An example of confirmation bias occurs when a person believes that she's having a bad day. Instead of recognizing all of the things that go well in the course of her day, she focuses on the one or two minor things that go wrong to support her theory that she is having a bad day.