* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download Scientists Tie Two Additional Genes to Dyslexia
Population genetics wikipedia , lookup
Medical genetics wikipedia , lookup
Genomic imprinting wikipedia , lookup
Ridge (biology) wikipedia , lookup
Gene desert wikipedia , lookup
Minimal genome wikipedia , lookup
Therapeutic gene modulation wikipedia , lookup
Gene therapy wikipedia , lookup
Gene nomenclature wikipedia , lookup
Genetic engineering wikipedia , lookup
Site-specific recombinase technology wikipedia , lookup
Genome evolution wikipedia , lookup
Epigenetics of human development wikipedia , lookup
Public health genomics wikipedia , lookup
History of genetic engineering wikipedia , lookup
Epigenetics of neurodegenerative diseases wikipedia , lookup
Gene expression programming wikipedia , lookup
Biology and consumer behaviour wikipedia , lookup
Nutriepigenomics wikipedia , lookup
Gene expression profiling wikipedia , lookup
Artificial gene synthesis wikipedia , lookup
Microevolution wikipedia , lookup
ARIVE 3.3.1 (may need to reorganize) Directions and video transcript for Think Aloud Directions: 1. Link to this article on the genetic basis of dyslexia 2. Read the article. Try to be aware of your inner dialogue between your mind and the article. 3. Watch the video (listen to the audio) of Linda Hecker modeling how she “Thinks Aloud” about the article http://www.cdl.org/resource-library/articles/genes_to_dyslexia.php?type=recent&id=Yes Scientists Tie Two Additional Genes to Dyslexia This article sounds really interesting to me because I’ve been following the story of genetics and dyslexia for a while. I know scientists have been trying to identify specific genes that are connected to dyslexia. I think I heard a while ago that specific chromosomes 6, 9, and 15 might be involved. I haven’t kept up with what’s happened in the last few years. This should help me stay current. by SANDRA BLAKESLEE I wonder who Sandra Blakeslee is? I don’t think she’s a scientist. Is she a science reporter? How accurate is her writing? Will it be hard to understand for a lay person? October 29, 2005 One year after scientists discovered a gene whose flaw contributes to dyslexia, two more such genes have now been identified. I didn’t even know about the last discovery. I’m really behind on my research. The findings, described yesterday in Salt Lake City at a meeting of the American Society of Human Genetics, support the idea that many people deemed simply lazy or stupid because of their severe reading problems may instead have a genetic disorder that interfered with the wiring of their brains before birth. I can’t believe anyone still believes in the “stupid or lazy” theory of dyslexia. We’ve known for a long time that dyslexic brains look and act differently than the brains of typical readers. And I still don’t agree that it’s a “disorder.” I think it’s a brain variant that’s essential to the gene pool. "I am ecstatic about this research," said Dr. Albert M. Galaburda of Harvard Medical School, a leading authority on developmental disorders who was not involved in the latest discoveries. Oh- Al Galaburda. I wondered if he was still involved in dyslexia research. I haven’t seen him in several years. He used to talk at the IDA conferences. I loved hearing about his research. He wasn’t into genetics so much as post-mortem autopsy studies, but he was the first researcher who turned me on to the brain difference theory of dyslexia. The findings, added to last year's, mean that for the first time, "we have a link between genes, brain development and a complex behavioral syndrome," Dr. Galaburda said. If Al Galaburda thinks this is hot stuff, I need to pay close attention. As many as a dozen genes are probably involved in the disorder, he said, with each playing a role in the necessary migration of neurons as the brain's circuitry develops. I knew it couldn’t be as simple as 1 or 2 genes. Researchers said a genetic test for dyslexia should be available within a year or less. Children in families that have a history of the disorder could then be tested, with a cheek swab, before they are exposed to reading instruction. If children carry a genetic risk, they could be placed in early intervention programs. Omigod – really genetic testing for dyslexia only a year away! I hope no one thinks it would be good to genetically engineer fetuses to avoid dyslexia. "Reading ability is a proxy for intelligence in American culture," said Dr. Sally E. Shaywitz of Yale University School of Medicine, a pediatrician who is an expert on dyslexia. The findings should help overcome stereotypes and get children the assistance they need, she said. Naturally, I’d expect Sally Shaywitz to weigh in on this issue. One of the genes newly linked to dyslexia is called DCDC2. It is active in reading centers in the human brain, said Dr. Jeffrey R. Gruen, a Yale geneticist who described the discovery at a news conference yesterday. Large deletions in a regulatory region of the gene were found in one of every five dyslexics tested, making it less active. This part is news to me. I never heard of DCDC2. Funny name. It needs a nickname. So, it seems to be about missing stuff in the genes. Fluent readers and dyslexics alike have the protein made by this gene, Dr. Gruen said, but it is less abundant in dyslexic brains. The function of the protein is not known, he said. Again, it’s interesting that it’s not an all or nothing control system, but a question of not having enough of something to function correctly. I’m not surprised they don’t know the protein’s function yet. Rats also have the DCDC2 gene, so it should not be misconstrued as a spelling or reading gene, Dr. Gruen said. Rather, the gene supports the circuitry that underlies reading. When it was perturbed in unborn rats, he said, neurons migrated shorter distances, undercutting early brain development. Hmmm. This is the most interesting part of all. It reminds me of Ginger Berninger’s book, “Brain Literacy for Educators.” She really stresses that the reading parts of the brain are built out of areas originally designed for other functions, because reading isn’t actually a “natural” process that is hard wired into human brains. The second gene, called Robo1, was discovered by Dr. Juha Kere, a professor of molecular genetics at the Karolinska Institute in Stockholm. It is a developmental gene that guides connections, called axons, between the brain's two hemispheres, Dr. Kere said in an interview. mmm. very interesting. This is the first I’ve heard of connecting the 2 hemispheres. When the gene's activity is reduced, the number of finer connections, called dendrites, is reduced in brain areas involved in reading. "You get the right signals going, but they do less well in terms of rapid processing," Dr. Kere said. Many dyslexia experts believe that reading problems stem from an inability to process the fast sounds of spoken words. More points for Paula Tallal’s research on rapid processing of sounds. This is fascinating. I can’t wait to hear more about this research. THINK ALOUD SCRIPT