* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download Last semester I tried a new strategy to teach macro
Ridge (biology) wikipedia , lookup
Frameshift mutation wikipedia , lookup
Genomic imprinting wikipedia , lookup
Gene therapy wikipedia , lookup
Polymorphism (biology) wikipedia , lookup
Therapeutic gene modulation wikipedia , lookup
Copy-number variation wikipedia , lookup
Genetic engineering wikipedia , lookup
Nutriepigenomics wikipedia , lookup
Public health genomics wikipedia , lookup
Epigenetics of human development wikipedia , lookup
Genetic drift wikipedia , lookup
Gene nomenclature wikipedia , lookup
Biology and consumer behaviour wikipedia , lookup
Gene desert wikipedia , lookup
Heritability of IQ wikipedia , lookup
History of genetic engineering wikipedia , lookup
Quantitative trait locus wikipedia , lookup
Genome evolution wikipedia , lookup
Site-specific recombinase technology wikipedia , lookup
Point mutation wikipedia , lookup
Gene expression profiling wikipedia , lookup
Gene expression programming wikipedia , lookup
Artificial gene synthesis wikipedia , lookup
Population genetics wikipedia , lookup
Genome (book) wikipedia , lookup
Designer baby wikipedia , lookup
The Candy Gene Pool Lori Barkley Selkirk College Castlegar, British Columbia, Canada [email protected] Last semester I tried a new strategy to teach macro-evolutionary processes. I have used a simple chart for years (see below), which I thought was quite succinct; if they could explain the chart they could explain the processes & thus demonstrate their understanding of them. It didn’t work for every student, however, & some still seemed unable to understand the processes. It was Halloween & I had lots of candy, so I brought in bags of candy so students could use it to illustrate the various processes. It could be used with anything really, but the candy was fun, cheap, & they can eat it as a reward or in the process. I broke them up into groups & gave them assorted candy—candy being genes (or alleles). For gene flow, we divided the candy (genes), then "introduced" some new candy/genes into the existing gene pool. This demonstrated how variation within the group increased, there was more variety in their candy/gene pool, & there were also more similarities between the 2 candy populations, thus the decrease in variation between populations. Then, there was a natural disaster, or out-migration, that wiped out part of the candy/gene pool, strategically, certain “genes” were lost, the variation within the pool decreased, which they could see, as well as the increase in variation between populations. The chart is projected the entire time, so they can connect what they are doing with the chart. So it went, for natural selection (they ate the candy they liked, or gave away what they didn’t like), mutation also offered numerous possibilities (candy could be partially eaten, squished, or the like)—this part was a little bit more challenging to come up with more positive mutations, so introduction of new candy was also used as a mutation. I’m sure someone out there is clever enough to offer a suggestion. I’ve only done it the once, but students responded really well. They enjoyed the session; they said they understood the processes because they could visualize what was happening. I’ll continue to use it & work out some of the glitches, as the exam scores showed that those who were there got it. I’m hoping others can build on this idea, or maybe already do something more advanced, so as to keep improving my germ of an idea. Evolutionary Process natural selection genetic mutation gene flow genetic drift Variation within the Population increases/decreases increases increases decreases Variation between Populations increases/decreases increases decreases increases