Download Irregular organization in the human chromosomes - SPring-8

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts

Cell cycle wikipedia , lookup

Cytokinesis wikipedia , lookup

List of types of proteins wikipedia , lookup

Cell nucleus wikipedia , lookup

Cell growth wikipedia , lookup

Kinetochore wikipedia , lookup

X-ray crystallography wikipedia , lookup

Myocyte wikipedia , lookup

Spindle checkpoint wikipedia , lookup

Meiosis wikipedia , lookup

Biochemical switches in the cell cycle wikipedia , lookup

Amitosis wikipedia , lookup

Nucleosome wikipedia , lookup

Mitosis wikipedia , lookup

Chromosome wikipedia , lookup

Transcript
Life Science: Medical Biology
Irregular organization in the human chromosomes
revealed by X-ray scattering
How is a long strand of DNA organized in the cell?
In molecular biology textbooks, we often find a typical
figure (Fig. 1(a)). To begin with, DNA is wrapped
around histones and forms a "nucleosome" (10-nm
fiber) structure. This nucleosome has been assumed
to be folded into the regular "30-nm chromatin fiber."
In one of the famous models, the "hierarchical helical
folding model," it is assumed that the 30-nm chromatin
fiber is folded progressively into larger fibers such as
~100-nm and then ~200-nm fibers, to form the final
mitotic chromosomes (Fig. 1(b)) or large chromatin
fiber (chromonema fiber) in interphase cell nuclei.
What do mitotic chromosomes actually look like
in cells? To see chromosomes as intact as possible,
we performed cryo-electron microscopy (cryo-EM) [1].
Surprisingly, cryo-EM and subsequent computational
image processing did not reveal any 30-nm chromatin
fibers in the mitotic chromosomes, but merely a
uniform disordered structure, which strongly argues
against the "established view" (Figs. 1(a) and 1(b)).
(a)
(b)
DNA
2 nm
Nucleosome
30 nm fiber
100 nm fiber
200-250 nm fiber
11 nm
500-750 nm fiber
30 nm chromatin fiber
30 nm
Mitotic chromosome
700 nm
Hierarchical helical structure?
Chromosomes
X-ray
2θ
Scattering Intensity
log ( I×S2 ) (arb. units)
(c)
0
~30
30 nm
(d)
~6nm
nm
~6
~11 nm
0.05 0.10 0.15 0.20
Scattering Vector S (nm–1)
Fig. 1. (a) Textbook image of chromatin, (b) hierarchical
helical folding model, (c) experimental setting of smallangle X-ray scattering, and (d) a typical scattering
pattern of human mitotic chromosomes.
32
On the other hand, cryo-EM observation can examine
only a limited portion of a chromosome, not the whole,
because the section thickness is only around 50 nm.
It was thus difficult to observe possible hierarchical
regular structures in the chromosomes, if any.
To investigate the bulk structure of the mitotic
chromosomes in solution, we performed small-angle
X-ray scattering (SAXS) [2,3]. Generally, when X-rays
are irradiated onto non-crystal materials, scattering at
small angles can generally reveal periodic structures
within samples (Fig. 1(c)). At beamline BL45XU,
the synchrotron X-ray beam was irradiated onto
isolated human chromosomes at the bottom of a
glass capillary, and scattering patterns were recoded
(Fig. 1(c)). A typical scattering pattern of mitotic
chromosomes showed three peaks: 30-nm, weak 11nm, and 6-nm peaks (Figs. 1(d) and 2(a)). This result
is completely consistent with those of experiments
conducted by Langmore & Paulson [4]. While the
11 nm and 6 nm peaks are believed to originate from
the spatial arrangement of nucleosomes, but the 30nm peak was assumed to represent the side-by-side
packing of the 30-nm chromatin fibers, and has long
been regarded as strong evidence for the existence
of these fibers in chromosomes. However, why could
we not observe such a 30-nm structure in the mitotic
chromosomes by cryo-EM?
To elucidate the nature of the 30-nm peak
observed by SAXS, the isolated chromosomes were
examined by cryo-EM. Again, no 30-nm chromatin
structures were observed inside chromosomes.
However, the cryo-EM images unexpectedly
showed that the chromosome surface was coated
with electron-dense granules of the similar size as
ribosomes (Fig. 2(a), bottom). Biochemical analyses
confirmed that they are ribosomes contaminating the
chromosome surface. The ribosomes were regularly
stacked with a ~30 nm spacing. We removed the
ribosomes from the chromosome surface by washing
with an isotonic buffer, with maintaining the size and
shape of chromosomes (Fig. 2(b), bottom). Strikingly,
in the chromosomes, no 30-nm peaks were detected
by SAXS (Fig. 2(b), top). However, other peaks
originating from the internal structure of nucleosomes
remained (Figs. 2(a) and 2(b)). We then concluded
that regularly folded 30-nm chromatin fibers are
essentially not present in human mitotic chromosomes.
Next, we investigated an entire region of mitotic
chromosomes at beamline BL29XUL using a newly
developed apparatus for ultra-small-angle X-ray
(a)
log (I×S2 ) (arb. units)
~30
30 nm
~6 nm
Scattering Intensity
log (I×S2 ) (arb. units)
Scattering Intensity
scattering (USAXS) (Fig. 2(c)) [2,5]. Again, we found
no regular periodic structures, including the 100 –150
or 200 – 250 nm structure, between ~ 50 and 1000
nm in mitotic chromosomes (Fig. 2(d)), contradicting
the hierarchical helical folding model (Fig. 1(b)). The
cryo-EM, SAXS, and USAXS data collectively indicate
that the irregularly folded nucleosome fibers make up
the bulk structure of human mitotic chromosomes.
How is the nucleosome fiber organized into
a mitotic chromosome? Since condensin and
topoisomeraseIIα, which are essential for chromosome
condensation, form an axis in the chromosome,
we assume that they globally hold the nucleosome
fibers around the chromosomal center (Fig. 3(a)) [2].
Locally, nucleosome fiber is folded in an irregular
manner toward the chromosome center (Fig. 3(a)).
Furthermore, SAXS and USAXS also revealed that
there are no periodic structures in the chromatin
in the interphase cells [3], suggesting that the bulk
~11
11 nm
0
0.2
0.4
Scattering Vector S
X-ray
0.6
(nm–1)
0.4
X-ray
No 30-nm
peak
Beamstop
Sample Capillaries
log (I×S2 ) (arb. units)
Scattering Intensity
Pinhole
Guard Slits
(d)
NPC
NE
NPC
Fig. 3. (a) Model structure of mitotic chromosomes
and (b) interphase chromatin. NE, nuclear envelop;
NPC, nuclear pore complex.
~300
~30
0 nm
nm
Kazuhiro Maeshima a,b,*, Yoshinori Nishino b,c and
Yasumasa Joti d
Structural Biology Center, National Institute of Genetics
SPring-8 /RIKEN
c
Research Institute for Electronic Science, Hokkaido University
d
SPring-8 /JASRI
a
b
*E-mail: [email protected]
~1000
~1
1000 nm
0.001
(b)
CCD
Detector
1.95 m
y
Irregular folding
Condensin
Nucleosome
A single nucleosome
fiber loop
0.6
Scattering Vector S (nm–1)
~30-nm
peak
(c)
(a)
(b)
~30
30
0 nm
n
~6
6 nm
n
~11 nm
0
0.2
interphase chromatin also consists of irregularly
folded nucleosome fibers (Fig. 3(b)).
In conclusion, X-ray scattering analysis revealed
that interphase chromatin and mitotic chromosomes
have similar local organizations: compact, irregular
folding of nucleosome fibers without the 30-nm
chromatin fiber (Figs. 3(a) and 3(b)). Although
the term "irregular" or "disordered" might give the
impression that the organizations are likely functionally
irrelevant, the irregular folding implies little physical
constraint and a highly dynamic property, leading
to a high degree of DNA accessibility. The irregular
organization may thus have several advantages in
template-directed biological processes in interphase
nuclei, including RNA transcription and DNA
replication and repair/recombination.
~50 nm
m
0.01
Scattering Vector S (nm–1)
Fig. 2. (a) SAXS profile of mitotic chromosome
fraction with ribosomes (top) and scheme (bottom),
(b) SAXS profile without ribosomes (top) and scheme
(bottom), (c) experimental setting for USAXS [5], and
(d) USAXS profile of human mitotic chromosomes.
References
[1] M. Eltsov et al.: Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 105 (2008)
19732.
[2] Y. Nishino, M. Eltsov, Y. Joti, K. Ito, H. Takata, Y.
Takahashi, S. Hihara, A.S. Frangakis, N. Imamoto, T.
Ishikawa, K. Maeshima: Embo J. 31 (2012) 1644.
[3] Y. Joti et al.: Nucleus 3 (2012) 404.
[4] J.P. Langmore and J.R. Paulson: J. Cell Biol. 96 (1983) 1120.
[5] Y. Nishino et al.: Phys. Rev. Lett. 102 (2009) 18101.
33