* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download Materials and Methods
Survey
Document related concepts
Discovery and development of beta-blockers wikipedia , lookup
5-HT2C receptor agonist wikipedia , lookup
Nicotinic agonist wikipedia , lookup
Psychopharmacology wikipedia , lookup
Discovery and development of antiandrogens wikipedia , lookup
NMDA receptor wikipedia , lookup
Toxicodynamics wikipedia , lookup
5-HT3 antagonist wikipedia , lookup
Neuropharmacology wikipedia , lookup
Discovery and development of angiotensin receptor blockers wikipedia , lookup
Cannabinoid receptor antagonist wikipedia , lookup
Transcript
Supplementary Material Inotropic effects of prostacyclins on the right ventricle are abolished in isolated rat hearts with right ventricular hypertrophy and failure Holmboe et al. Supplementary Methods Rat model of right heart hypertrophy and failure Right ventricular (RV) hypertrophy and failure was induced by pulmonary trunk banding (PTB) as previously described.1-3 Anesthesia was induced with 7 % sevofluran and maintained with 3.5% sevoflurane (Abbot Scandinavia AB, Solona, Sweden) in a mixture of O2 1L/min and N2O 0.5 L/min. The rats were subjected to a thoracotomy revealing the heart. The pulmonary trunk was banded with a titanium clip (Horizon Ligating Clips ref. 001200, Weck Closure Systems, USA) using a horizon applier (Horizon Applier, small, cat. #HZ137081, Weck Closure Systems, USA). The clip was compressed to an inner diameter of 1.0 mm or 0.5 mm generating either RV hypertrophy (HYP) or manifest RV failure (FAIL). Rats without banding served as healthy controls. To reduce post-operative pain, buprenorphine was injected subcutaneously (0.12 mg/kg) during the procedure and applied to the drinking water (7.4 μg/mL) for three days postoperatively. Echocardiography Before isolating the hearts for the Langendorff, RV hypertrophy and function were evaluated using a Vevo 2100 echocardiographic system (Visual Sonics, Toronto, Canada) with a 21 MHz linear array transducer. M-mode was used to measure tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (TAPSE), a measure of RV systolic function correlating well to RV ejection fraction and survival in rats as well as in humans.4,5 Cardiac output (CO) was calculated as CO = SVxHR = (PAdiameter/2)×π×VTI×HR (PAdiameter: pulmonary artery diameter, VTI: velocity time integral, HR: heart rate).6 The VTI was measured using pulsed wave doppler, parallel to the flow at the same level as the measured diameter. Tricuspid regurgitation was evaluated using color Doppler. All 2 analyses were made during expiration and are presented as a mean of three consecutive measurements. The Isolated perfused heart model – Langendorff The rat hearts were isolated and connected to a pressure controlled Langendorff setup as previously described.7 Anaesthesia was induced with a subcutaneous injection of a mix of midazolam (0.5 mg/kg), fentanyl citrate (0.158 mg/kg) and fluanisone (5 mg/kg). The aorta was cannulated and retrograde perfusion was initiated before cutting out the heart and connecting it to the Langendorff system (modified IH-SR type 844/1; Hugo Sachs Elektronik, Harvard Apparatus, MarchHugstetten, Germany). Krebs-Henseleit buffer ((mmol l−1) NaCl 118.5; KCl 4.7; NaHCO3 25.0, glucosemonohydrate 11.0; MgSO4 1.2; CaCl2 2.4; KH2PO4, 1.2) was used as perfusion media, gassed with 95 % O2 and 5 % CO2 to keep the pH at 7.4 and the heart oxygenized. RV hemodynamic parameters were monitored using a fluid filled balloon introduced into the RV and connected to a pressure transducer. The diastolic pressure was set to 5 mmHg and the hearts were perfused with a constant pressure of 80 mmHg. Hemodynamic parameters were measured and calculated with Notocord Hem Software (NOTOCORD Systems, Croissy, France). The rate pressure product = HR×RV developed pressure, was used as a parameter indicative of cardiac work. Expression of prostanoid receptors in the RV RV tissue was excised from rats with normal hearts (n=8), hypertrophic RV (n=8) and RV failure (n=8) and snapped frozen in liquid nitrogen. cDNA was synthesized from RNA isolated from the RV tissue as described below. 3 RNA isolation RNA was isolated from the RV tissue using a commercial RNA purification kit according to the manufactures instructions (NucleoSpin® RNA II, Macherey-Nagel, Düren, Germany). 30 mg of tissue was homogenized (TissueLyser). 350 µL lysis buffer and 3.5 uL mercaptoethanol was added and vortexed. The lysate was filtered using the NucleoSpin® Filter. 350 µL ethanol was added to the lysate, loaded to the NucleoSpin® RNA II Column and centrifuged for 30 seconds at 11000 x g. The column was transferred to a new tube and 350 µL desalting buffer was added and centrifuged for 1 minute at 11000 x g. The column was incubated for 15 minutes with 95 µL DNase reaction mixture to digest DNA. Finally the column was washed and centrifuged 3 times and RNA eluated in 27 µL RNase-free H2O. RNA concentration determination The concentration of the RNA in the samples was determined using a spectrophotometer (Eppendorf® BioPhotometer, Hamburg, Germany). The concentration was measured at wavelength 260 nm and the samples were diluted in RNase free H2O to a final concentration of 0.5 µg/mL. Proper quality and integrity of a random sample of the RNA were confirmed using an Agilent 2100 Bioanalyzer (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, USA). cDNA synthesis cDNA was synthesized from the RNA using RevertAid First Strand cDNA Synthesis Kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, USA) according to manufacturers instructions. RNA, nuclease-free water and random primer were mixed, centrifuged and incubated at 65 oC for 5 minutes. Reaction buffer, RiboLock RNase inhibitor, dNTP mix and the reverse transcriptase were added and incubated at 25 oC for 5 minutes followed by incubation at 42 oC for 60 minutes and finally at 70 oC for 5 minutes to terminate the reaction. 4 Quantitative Polymerase Chain Reaction (qPCR) Primers (DNA Technology A/S, Risskov, Denmark) used in qPCR were designed for the β-myosin heavy chain (β-MHC), sarco/endoplasmatic reticulum Ca2+-ATPase-2 (SERCA-2) and the rat prostanoid receptor subtypes IP, EP1, EP2, EP3, EP4, DP1, TP and FP genes (Table s1). Before samples were run, each primer was tested, and the PCR product sequenced to confirm the right product was amplified. Sequencing was made on a 3130XL Genetic Analyzer, Applied Biosystems® (Life Technologies, Waltham, USA). Amplification of the right products was confirmed. 2 µL of each sample cDNA, water, SYBR Green Master Mix (Maxima SYBR Green qPCR Master Mix (2X), Thermo Scientific, Waltham, USA), ROX solution and the primer specific for the gene of interest were added to wells in duplicate. The samples were run in Mx3000p qPCR system (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, USA) for 40 cycles of 95 oC for 30 seconds, 60 oC for 60 seconds and 72oC for 60 seconds. Materials Iloprost (Ilomedin) was purchased from Bayer Schering Pharma (Berlin-Wedding, Germany), treprostinil (Remodulin) from NordicInfu Care AB (Nacka Strand, Sweden), epoprostenol (Flolan) from GlaxoSmithKline (London, UK), and MRE-269 from Cayman Chemicals (Ann Arbor, USA). Dobutamine (Dobutrex) was purchased from PharmaCoDane (Herlev, Denmark). The DP1 receptor antagonist, BW A868C, was purchased from Sigma-Aldrich, USA, the EP2 receptor antagonist, PF04418948, from Pfizer Inc. (New York City, USA), and the IP receptor antagonist, RO1138452, from Cayman Chemical (Ann Arbor, USA). The anaesthesia was made of Dormicum® (midazolam) from Matrix Pharmaceuticals, (Hellerup, Denmark) and 5 Hypnorm® (fentanyl citrate and fluanisone) from VetaPharma Ltd, (Leeds, UK). Buprenorphine (Termgesic®) was from RB Pharmaceuticals Limited (Slough, UK). The concentrations of the prostacyclin mimetics used in this study was chosen to include a broad range of concentrations starting from clinically relevant doses to supra-clinical doses. Thus are the first 2 concentrations of iloprost and treprostinil, the first 3 concentrations of epoprostenol and the first concentration of MRE-269 comparable to what is used in the clinic. This is based on previous studies and calculated from information regarding plasma protein binding and pharmacokinetics of each agent.8-13 The concentrations of the receptor antagonists were chosen based on previous studies. In vivo and ex vivo studies have shown that 1 uM (and below) of BWA868C effectively inhibit DP1 receptors in the rat.14,15 PF04418948 has also been demonstrated to effectively antagonise EP2 receptors at 1µM (and below) in several previous in vitro studies.16-18 6 References 1. Andersen S, Schultz JG, Andersen A, Ringgaard S, Nielsen JM, Holmboe S, Vildbrad MD, de Man FS, Bogaard HJ, Vonk-Noordegraaf A, Nielsen-Kudsk JE. Effects of bisoprolol and losartan treatment in the hypertrophic and failing right heart. J Card Fail. 2014;20:864–873. 2. Holmboe S, Andersen A, Vildbrad MD, Nielsen JM, Ringgaard S, Nielsen-Kudsk JE. Iloprost improves ventricular function in the hypertrophic and functionally impaired right heart by direct stimulation. Pulm Circ. 2013;3:870–879. 3. Schou UK, Peters CD, Wan Kim S, Frøkiær J, Nielsen S. Characterization of a rat model of right-sided heart failure induced by pulmonary trunk banding. Journal of Experimental Animal Science. 2007;43:237–254. 4. Hardziyenka M, Campian ME, de Bruin-Bon HACMR, Michel MC, Tan HL. Sequence of echocardiographic changes during development of right ventricular failure in rat. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2006;19:1272–1279. 5. Ghio S, Recusani F, Klersy C, Sebastiani R, Laudisa ML, Campana C, Gavazzi A, Tavazzi L. Prognostic usefulness of the tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion in patients with congestive heart failure secondary to idiopathic or ischemic dilated cardiomyopathy. Am J Cardiol. 2000;85:837–842. 6. Urboniene D, Haber I, Fang Y-H, Thenappan T, Archer SL. Validation of high-resolution echocardiography and magnetic resonance imaging vs. high-fidelity catheterization in experimental pulmonary hypertension. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol. 2010;299:L401–12. 7 7. Løfgren B, Povlsen JA, Rasmussen LE, Støttrup NB, Solskov L, Krarup P-M, Kristiansen SB, Bøtker HE, Nielsen TT. Amino acid transamination is crucial for ischaemic cardioprotection in normal and preconditioned isolated rat hearts--focus on L-glutamate. Exp Physiol. 2010;95:140–152. 8. Krause W, Krais T. Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of the prostacyclin analogue iloprost in man. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 1986;30:61–68. 9. McSwain CS, Benza R, Shapiro S, Hill N, Schilz R, Elliott CG, Zwicke DL, Oudiz RJ, Staszewski JP, Arneson CP, Wade M, Zaccardelli D, McLaughlin V. Dose proportionality of treprostinil sodium administered by continuous subcutaneous and intravenous infusion. J Clin Pharmacol. 2008;48:19–25. 10. Fontana M, Olschewski H, Olschewski A, Schlüter K-D. Treprostinil potentiates the positive inotropic effect of catecholamines in adult rat ventricular cardiomyocytes. Br J Pharmacol. 2007;151:779–786. 11. Kuwano K, Hashino A, Asaki T, Hamamoto T, Yamada T, Okubo K, Kuwabara K. 2-[4[(5,6-diphenylpyrazin-2-yl)(isopropyl)amino]butoxy]-N-(methylsulfonyl)acetamide (NS304), an orally available and long-acting prostacyclin receptor agonist prodrug. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2007;322:1181–1188. 12. Simonneau G, Torbicki A, Hoeper MM, Delcroix M, Karlócai K, Galiè N, Degano B, Bonderman D, Kurzyna M, Efficace M, Giorgino R, Lang IM. Selexipag: an oral, selective prostacyclin receptor agonist for the treatment of pulmonary arterial hypertension. Eur Respir J. 2012;40:874–880. 13. Galiè N, Humbert M, Vachiery J-L, Gibbs S, Lang I, Torbicki A, Simonneau G, Peacock A, Vonk-Noordegraaf A, Beghetti M, Ghofrani A, Gomez-Sanchez MA, Hansmann G, 8 Klepetko W, Lancellotti P, Matucci M, McDonagh T, Pierard LA, Trindade PT, Zompatori M, Hoeper M. 2015 ESC/ERS Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of pulmonary hypertension: The Joint Task Force for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Pulmonary Hypertension of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the European Respiratory Society (ERS): Endorsed by: Association for European Paediatric and Congenital Cardiology (AEPC), International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation (ISHLT). Eur Respir J. 2015;46:903–975. 14. Ebersberger A, Natura G, Eitner A, Halbhuber K-J, Rost R, Schaible H-G. Effects of prostaglandin D2 on tetrodotoxin-resistant Na+ currents in DRG neurons of adult rat. Pain. 2011;152:1114–1126. 15. Hamid-Bloomfield S, Whittle BJ. Antagonism of PGD2 vasodepressor responses in the rat in vivo by the novel, selective antagonist, BW A868C. Br J Pharmacol. 1989;96:307–312. 16. Säfholm J, Dahlén S-E, Delin I, Maxey K, Stark K, Cardell L-O, Adner M. PGE2 maintains the tone of the guinea pig trachea through a balance between activation of contractile EP1 receptors and relaxant EP2 receptors. Br J Pharmacol. 2013;168:794–806. 17. af Forselles KJ, Root J, Clarke T, Davey D, Aughton K, Dack K, Pullen N. In vitro and in vivo characterization of PF-04418948, a novel, potent and selective prostaglandin EP₂ receptor antagonist. Br J Pharmacol. 2011;164:1847–1856. 18. Birrell MA, Maher SA, Buckley J, Dale N, Bonvini S, Raemdonck K, Pullen N, Giembycz MA, Belvisi MG. Selectivity profiling of the novel EP2 receptor antagonist, PF-04418948, in functional bioassay systems: atypical affinity at the guinea pig EP2 receptor. Br J Pharmacol. 2013;168:129–138. 9 Legends Figure s1. Effect of dobutamine (0.1 μg/mL) on heart rate (A), dP/dtmax (B) and RV developed pressure (C). Control n=30, Hypertrophic n=32, Failure n=32. Results are presented as mean±SD. ***p<0.001, ****p<0.001, Student’s t-test. RV: right ventricle. Figure s2: Effects of increasing concentrations of treprostinil and dobutamine on RV function with constant flow (13 mL/min), (n=7). Values are presented as mean +SD. RV: right ventricle. †p<0.05, ††p<0.01, compared to baseline. *p<0.05, **p<0.01, compared to treprostinil 150 ng/mL. Figure s3: Effects of sodium nitroprusside on RV function. Control n=8, Hypertrophic n=8, Failure n=8. Values are presented as mean +SD. †p<0.05, ††p<0.01, †††p<0.001, compared to baseline. RV: right ventricle. Bpm: beats per minute. Figure s4: Effects of increasing concentrations of treprostinil (n=8) and A-B: the DP1 receptor antagonist, BW A868C (1 µM) (n=7) or C-D: the EP2 receptor antagonist, PF04418948 (n=8). Values are presented as relative to mean of baseline normalized to 1, +SD. None of the two antagonists altered the effect of treprostinil significantly, using 2-way ANOVA. †p<0.05, ††p<0.01, †††p<0.001, compared to baseline. RV: right ventricle. 10