* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download Mainstreaming Climate Change in CAADP processes in
Global warming controversy wikipedia , lookup
Economics of climate change mitigation wikipedia , lookup
Myron Ebell wikipedia , lookup
2009 United Nations Climate Change Conference wikipedia , lookup
Michael E. Mann wikipedia , lookup
Soon and Baliunas controversy wikipedia , lookup
Global warming wikipedia , lookup
Climatic Research Unit email controversy wikipedia , lookup
Climate change feedback wikipedia , lookup
Climatic Research Unit documents wikipedia , lookup
Fred Singer wikipedia , lookup
Heaven and Earth (book) wikipedia , lookup
General circulation model wikipedia , lookup
German Climate Action Plan 2050 wikipedia , lookup
ExxonMobil climate change controversy wikipedia , lookup
Climate resilience wikipedia , lookup
Climate sensitivity wikipedia , lookup
Politics of global warming wikipedia , lookup
Climate change denial wikipedia , lookup
Effects of global warming on human health wikipedia , lookup
United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change wikipedia , lookup
Economics of global warming wikipedia , lookup
Effects of global warming wikipedia , lookup
Climate engineering wikipedia , lookup
Climate change in Australia wikipedia , lookup
Climate change in Saskatchewan wikipedia , lookup
Climate governance wikipedia , lookup
Attribution of recent climate change wikipedia , lookup
Solar radiation management wikipedia , lookup
Citizens' Climate Lobby wikipedia , lookup
Climate change in Tuvalu wikipedia , lookup
Climate change adaptation wikipedia , lookup
Climate change in the United States wikipedia , lookup
Carbon Pollution Reduction Scheme wikipedia , lookup
Media coverage of global warming wikipedia , lookup
Scientific opinion on climate change wikipedia , lookup
Climate change and agriculture wikipedia , lookup
Public opinion on global warming wikipedia , lookup
IPCC Fourth Assessment Report wikipedia , lookup
Effects of global warming on humans wikipedia , lookup
Surveys of scientists' views on climate change wikipedia , lookup
MAINSTREAMING CLIMATE CHANGE IN CAADP POLICY PROCESSES IN MALAWI Civil Society Agriculture Network Anamwino House City Centre P.O Box 203 Lilongwe Malawi Tel: +265 1 770 479 Fax: +265 1 770 492 Email: [email protected] www.cisanetmw.org August 2012 The work of producing this report was made possible with financial support from the European Union the International Food Security Network projects. The views raised in this report do not necessarily reflect those of the donors 1 (i) Abstract Agriculture in Malawi and the world over is faced with a lot of challenges. However, it has been noted of late that one of the major causes of the current challenges that are affecting agriculture is the change taking place in climate globally (IPCC, 2007; Bie et al, 2007). Agriculture in Malawi is predominantly practiced in dry lands and is dependent on rainfall as opposed to irrigation. This has made it to be very vulnerable to climate change. Currently, the notable effect that climate change has brought, is the shrinkage of the rainy season where the decline has gone from seven months to about four months (Saka and Phiri, 2008). This distinct mark of seasonal variability has also come along with it, some weather extremes such as floods and drought that have increased both in frequency and intensity and in recent years have devastated the agriculture productivity in Malawi (Devereux et al, 2008). Over the past four years, nations of Africa have adopted the Comprehensive African Agriculture Development Program (CAADP) as a harmonised policy document for the development of agriculture ion the continent and Malawi is a signatory to the statues of this program. To domesticate the CAADP, Malawi developed the Agriculture Sector wide Approach, which is a harmonised policy document for the development of Agriculture in Malawi. However, in addition to this policy document, the Malawi’s agricultural sector is currently being governed by about 23 policy documents. These policies cover all areas related to agriculture. One striking feature observed in all these policies documents about climate change is that they are either silent or do not say much on climate change and how policy is going to tackle its effects in agriculture. Though the ASWAp which is the most recent policy among the 23 has hinted on something on climate change but it is still wanting on the emphasis and process of how to mainstream these into the subsequent programs of this policy document. It has also been observed that most of these policies were written in the 80’s and 90’s when the issues to do with climate change were not much of an issues in the development discourse locally and internationally. However, as the shift is taking place towards the management of climate change in development, policies especially those in agriculture need also to respond by being redrafted to be inline with the current state of affairs. This paper explores the current trends in Malawi as far as climate policy in agriculture is concerned. It will look at; who are the current players/actors and networks; what are their narratives and how are they framing the climate change problem in terms of increasing vulnerability of the agricultural systems due to variations in seasonality and disasters and what answers are they suggesting? What are the politics involved in all these (Between the civil society, donors and government). What spaces of policy engagement are available and what spaces are opening up? What role is research playing in informing the debate on climate change adaptation in Malawi in general and agriculture in particular and what is the role of the media and what has the media done so far? Of late the government of Malawi has put in place several social protection measures like the agricultural Input subsidies, what is their role in averting climate disasters and what is the position of the actors on this? This paper has also reviewed some policies in agriculture and environment that talks about climate change and explore the gaps in these policies and also made recommendations on how they can be redesigned to respond to climate change and seasonal variability. 2 (ii) Contents list (i) Abstract 2 (ii) Contents list 3 (iii) Acronyms list 4 Introduction. 5 2.0 Literature Review 6 3.0 Methodology 7 3.1 Desk Reviews 7 3.4 Conceptual framework 8 4.2.0 Actors, Networks and their narrative on the climate change question 9 4.2.1 Preamble 9 4.2.2 The Government 9 4.2.3 The Civil Society 9 4.2.4 Media 11 4.2.5 Private Sector Error! Bookmark not defined. 4.2.6 The Donors Error! Bookmark not defined. 4.2.7 The Academia/Research Error! Bookmark not defined. 4.3 Politics of Policy and Spaces for Engagement 12 4.4.0 A quick overview of some of the Agricultural and Environmental policies in relation to climate change 4.4.1 Preamble 14 4.4.2 National Irrigation Policy and Development Strategy 15 4.4.3 National Environmental Policy and Action Plan 15 4.4.4 The Malawi National Strategy for Sustainable Development 16 4.4.5 The National Water Policy 16 4.4.6 National Biodiversity Policy and Action Plan 16 4.4.7 National Adaptation Plan of Action (NAPA) 17 5.0 Conclusion and Policy recommendations 17 5.2 Strengthen the Role the Non-state Actors 18 6.0 References 19 14 3 (iii) Acronyms list ADP CAADP CARD CEPA CISANET CRS CSR CURE GDP IRLAD MEET MEGS MGDS MNSSD MPRSP MRFC MVAC NAPA NASFAM NBSAP NEAP NEP NEPAD NORAD OIBM SWAP UNDP WSSD Agricultural Development Programme Comprehensive African Agriculture Development Programme Churches Action for Relief and Development Centre for Environmental Policy and Advocacy Civil Society Agriculture Network Catholic Relief Services Centre for Social Research Coordination Unit for the Rehabilitation of the Environment Gross Domestic Product Irrigation, Rural Livelihoods and Agricultural Development Programme Malawi Environmental Endowment Trust Malawi Economic Growth Strategy Malawi Growth and Development Strategy Malawi National Strategy for Sustainable Development Malawi Poverty Reduction Strategy Paper Malawi Rural Finance Company Malawi Vulnerability Assessment Committee National Adaptation Plan of Action National Association of Smallholder Farmers in Malawi National Biodiversity Policy and Action Plan National Environmental Action Plan National Environmental Policy New Economic Partnership for African Development Norwegian Agency for International Development Opportunity International Bank of Malawi Sector Wide Approach United Nations Development Programme World Summit on Sustainable Development 4 Introduction. Climate change has become an important phenomenon that is affecting development worldwide. Among the sectors that have become most affected by climate change is that of agriculture. This paper will therefore explore some of the recent developments and debates taking place in Malawi in as far as climate change policy in agriculture is concerned and how climate change issues are finding their way into agricultural policy process, especially the ASWAp. Since the late 70’s and the early 80’s it became apparent that the earth is undergoing a significant shift in climate. According to IPCC (2007), it has now been generally accepted that this climate change is indeed taking place, and is to a greater extent as a result of human activities. Most climate change models predict that global temperatures will rise by about 1-30C by the year 2100 in response to a rise in carbon dioxide concentration levels. According to the same report, this projected change is larger than any other climate change over the last 10,000 years and is likely to have significant impact on global environment, such as a rise in sea levels, flooding, and droughts; with negative impact on food security, and undesirable consequences on physical infrastructures, economic activities, human settlements and health. These changes are likely to have a significant impact on food production and sustainable livelihoods of smallholder households, around the developing world. However, the IPCC report further indicates that although the general effects of climate change may be known, it is not easy to predict them accurately in most local context. Such unpredictability has brought a lot of uncertainty to countries that are heavily dependent on agriculture like Malawi. Most of these countries have seen a rise in climate variabilities such as the increasing intensity of rain within a short period of time which has resulted in floods that have destroyed the crops and other sources of livelihoods. In Malawi, there have also been incidences of drought that have resulted in crop failure in most parts of the central and southern regions of the country (Bei et al, 2007; Saka and Phiri, 2008). The current changes in weather patterns in Malawi as observed by the Malawi Meteorological Service and noted by all farmers (Action Aid, 2006) include higher temperatures, delayed and shorter rainy seasons and increased intensity of rainfall. However it is difficult to say with certainty that these observed changes in patterns of weather reflect the trends in possible longer-term climate variability’s and their effects on Malawi’s agriculture. Agriculture is a very important sector in Malawi as it provides about 40% of the GDP, 90% of all export earnings and it employs directly and indirectly about 80% of the entire workforce. Agriculture also account for about 60% of all rural income. Having such a core function to play in the economy, it is imperative that agricultural policies should address the issues and the challenges that are coming as a result of climate change as a priority. As pointed out earlier, the agricultural sector in Malawi is governed by about 23 policy documents covering different subsectors which include among others; crops, livestock, research and extension. However most of these policies are virtually silent on climate change. This could be attributed to the fact that most of these policies were written in the 80’s and 90’s when climate change was not an issue in agriculture to seriously think about and address through a national policy. However, in 1997 the Government of Malawi in response to he dictates of the CAADP embarked on a process to develop the Agricultural Sector wide Approach (ASWAP). This is a harmonised policy document that will provide a basis for planning and also as a reference document for all agricultural programs for all sector players in Malawi. On issues of climate and agriculture in Malawi, there have been several efforts that have been carried out by the donor community, the civil society and the NGOs in spearheading the incorporation of climate change issues in the national policy and programmes. In general Malawi has three major overarching policy documents which provide a framework for all sectoral policies in agriculture. These policy documents are the Vision 2020, the Malawi Growth and Development Strategy (MGDS ll) and the ASWAp. 5 In this paper, chapter one explores why is climate change a concern to agriculture in Malawi, which may also be the case in most southern African countries. It will provide some background to agricultural growth in Malawi and how the issue of climate change is slowly taking centre stage in the policy debates taking place. It will highlight on how policy issues, on the interaction between environment and agriculture has evolved over time. Chapter two will provide the conceptual framework under which the research was conducted. This framework borrows some ideas from the concept used in Keeley and Scoones (2003) in analysing the relationship between policy narratives, actors and networks and also politics involved in the policy arena. Chapter three explores the actors and networks currently operating in Malawi’s agricultural sector. It looks at what are their narratives on climate change problem? and how do they frame the climate change problem surrounding agricultural production? Chapter four explores the politics and constraints/limitations relating to policy change according to the identified actors and what are their suggestions. It will also look as to what are the spaces currently opening up for policy engagement? What are the limitations for engagement? Chapter five provides some analysis of the policies in agriculture and environment concerning climate change and look at what are the issues being raised in these policies and how are these addressing the gaps in the ASWAp. 2.0 Literature Review Several studies are being carried out worldwide to analyse and understand the effects of climate change on agriculture. It is interesting to note that some of these studies have indicated that climate change will affect agriculture both negatively and positively in the short to medium term. Devereux and Edwards (2004) and Parry et al (1999) indicated that the temperate regions of the northern hemisphere and the tropical and sub-tropical regions, which are mainly in the southern half of the world, will be affected differently. The temperate region, especially the north America and parts of Europe and a large part of the Russian federation will experience an increase in agricultural land, the land that is currently too cold to be used for agriculture. Additionally, there will also be an increase in crop productivity due to the increased amount of Carbon Dioxide in the atmosphere through the process of CO2 Fertilisation which will enhance the amount of photosynthesis taking place in plants (Devereux and Edwards, 2004; Slater et al, 2007). However, other literature have challenged the CO2 fertilisation concept as being difficult to measure in practice unless subjected to agronomic experiments. It is also difficult to isolate the effects of Carbon Dioxide over time against a background of other agricultural technological developments that may also enhance productivity, taking also into consideration that atmospheric Carbon Dioxide will be evenly distributed in the world atmosphere. (Mendelson, 2000). Climate change has not only affected crops but also other classes of agriculture like livestock and aquaculture which ASWAp is also promoting as a way of diversifying agricultural productivity in Malawi. The productivity of livestock is being affected directly as well as indirectly by changes in climate. It has also been reported that domestic livestock, like other animals, have a certain climate threshold below which they perform optimally. Beyond this thermal optimum, meat and milk production declines. Worst still, it has also been noted that there is limited potential for extending this limit through breeding. When the temperature limits are reached, cattle stop eating, movement such as walking to pasture and water are hindered, breeding is interrupted, and milk production drops (Field, 2005; Notenbaert et al, 2006: Rowlinson et al, 2008). The heat-induced loss of appetite can also delay the time an animal takes to reach market weight by a year or more (Notenbaert et al, 2006). The indirect effects of climate change on livestock may be those associated with food and pasture production. There is some correlation between reduction in the number of livestock and rainfall, mostly the direct link has been through grass production. Low subsistence agricultural 6 output has also translated in the reduction in numbers of animals that directly compete with humans for food such as pigs (Dandaula, 2008). It is also important to note that the effects of climate change on agriculture is not only the changes in seasons, average temperature and rainfall but also the changes in the frequency, severity and recently the spatial distribution of extreme weather events that have been costly to agriculture. Climate change has led to weather variability’s and extremes like droughts which have mostly been as a result of La Nina as was the case during the 2000/2001 drought that affected most of the southern Africa region and floods which have mostly been as a result of El Nino, one example in point was the floods that affected the Zambezi basin during the 2000 and 2007 rainy season in central Mozambique (UNDP, 2007). However, it is argued in some literature that global warming is not a new phenomenon, it is not a thing of the future but rather a thing of the past, as a matter of fact Africa is much warmer today than it was some hundred years ago and the rate of warming has been about 0.5 degrees per century (Hulme et al. 2001). Farmers and African agriculture have been adapting to these changes in climate and seasonality using indigenous farming methods such as shifting cultivation and intercropping among others over a long period of time (Richards, 1985). However, the major challenge now is the destructive frequency and severity that is being associated with droughts and floods that are coming due to largely as a result of climate change On the overall climate change is going to affect most of the efforts being carried out in poverty reduction because most of the poor people are directly involved in agriculture (Slater et al, 2007). However, projections are showing that the gross grain production in the world may not be affected much by climate change at least by 2080. This is because in as much as most of the southern countries will lose their agricultural land, there will be much gains in the temperate regions thereby balancing out the losses in the south (Devereux and Edwards, 2004). However, this will mean an increase in rural poverty levels in most of the southern communities whose livelihood is directly linked to agriculture. This agriculture-climate change-livelihood linkage has made Agriculture to be central for modelling the impacts of climate change on poverty. A study carried out by Davies et al (2009) that linked climate change adaptation, disaster risk reduction and social protection in agriculture demonstrated much more on this linkage. It indicated the importance of agriculture in ending rural poverty and how a greater understanding of this linkage in the agriculture sector can help in coming up with policies that help alleviate poverty. 3.0 Methodology 3.1 Desk Reviews The study reviewed a number of document including Government policies on agriculture and environment and other online documents. However the main document of reference was the ASWAp Key Informant interviews The study involved interviews with some key informants and that included, Dr Tennyson Nzengeza, the Officer in Charge of Lifuwu Research Station, The Mr. Phewa, Deputy Program Manager for Salima Agriculture Development Division. It also included interviews with NGOs, and Famer organisation. 7 3.4 Conceptual framework The study analysed the agriculture policy environment in Malawi in the wake of climate change by using the concept, developed and applied in Keeley and Scoones (2003) which analyses the interaction between the policy discourse, in this case the ASWAp and narratives of the actors and networks working within a particular political environment with varying interest from the actors. As you may observe in the subsequent chapters, there have been different perspectives on climate change in agriculture and how it can be fully mainstreamed into ASWAp and other policies. There is a general view within the Ministry of Agriculture that climate change has brought in nothing new that warrants a radical policy change but the same old phenomena like floods and drought. However, there is a process that have been initiated within the newly established Ministry of Climate Change and Environmental Affairs with support from UNDP to develop a National Climate Change Policy framework that will guide the mainstreaming of climate change into policies but also be used as a tool for awareness on climate change. Currently the different actors are still seen to be in the process of developing their narratives and positions on climate change and agriculture and there is an increased knowledge and understanding of climate change and its effects on peoles livelihoods in general and agriculture in particular. However it has been observed that the current dominant narratives among the actors are coming from the civil society and the government with the other actors like the media and the private sector being on the peripheral. This paper has made an attempt to look at the policy narratives involved in each of these actors and how they framing the problem of climate change. Policy narratives can be understood as stories about policy change. They normally describe the beginning, the middle and the end of the story and also describe the events that help in shaping policy. They provide a worldview of a particular actor or a network about a certain issues.. In all the debates taking place the most important thing to note is that the Malawi policy environment is conducive for the alternative policy narratives to strive and cross-fertilise each other in the search for a possible solution. The paper has also to explored the actors and networks that are currently operating in the climate change policy arena. These are individuals or groups of individuals that have a shared vision and have similar belief systems and established patterns of behaviour (Gaventa, 2007). Through these networks, narratives are developed, spread and maintained using various means like conferences, list serves among others. In the Malawian context there are several actors and networks that have sprung up as the subsequent chapters will highlight, these have helped in creating a wider space for policy engagement. In addition to these, the politics and other interests from those actors have also been explored. Though much politics have not yet sprung out, as the debates are still in their infant stage. However, the donors who are mostly playing behind the scene have made a bigger influence on the debate. The newly established Ministry that will specifically look at climate change, will help in bring some form of harmony and coordination on climate change to be centrally done. It is however yet to be seen whether the increasing demand for resource control and budgetary allocations to climate change among Government ministries and Departments and also other sector players issues will lead to real politics in the climate change policy processes. Finally, through this concept, the paper has also explored the spaces opening up for policy debates. A policy space can be understood as a limit and boundaries or forum for interface and conduit for negotiations between the state and the society (Cornwall and Coelho, 2007). They are the moments and opportunities where citizens and the policy makers come together to explore a particular issue for a common solution. Spaces can be divided into three broad categories, which are closed spaces, invited spaces and created or claimed space (Gaventa, 2007). Most of these kinds of spaces are manifesting themselves in the Malawi climate change policy arena. 8 4.2.0 Actors, Networks and their Narrative on the Climate Change question 4.2.1 Preamble The actors in the Malawi agricultural policy landscape, especially on the climate change question have been divided in this write up into six categories and these include: The Government, the donors, the private sector, the civil society including the farmers, the Academia (Research) and the Media. The first four actors listed were the signatories of the CAADP compact and are also part of the of the current implementation framework of ASWAp in Malawi. As the debate on the climate policy is unfolding, each of these actors is also developing its own narratives and framings based on their experiences and how much they have been exposed to the problem of climate change as it relates to agriculture and food security. However, out of these seven, the major actors ‘on stage’ are the Government, Farmers and the Civil Society while the major actors ‘off stage’ are the donors and the academia. The private sector has a remote role that it is playing at the moment, while the media has taken a reactive position to issues that are coming up. 4.2.2 The Government Climate change has affected the activities of almost all the ministries in Government. However the ministries that have been directly affected include the ministries of Agriculture, Climate Change and Environmental Affairs, Energy and Mining, Education and the Ministry of Health. All these ministries have perceived the problem of climate change differently according to how their sector has been affected but in this paper the focus has been on the narratives from the ministry of agriculture and the agriculture sector. It has been generally accepted within the Ministry of Agriculture in Malawi, as is the case with the rest of the actors that climate change is affecting agriculture. The 2007/2008 UN Human Development report has shown that global warming is projected to increase by 2-3 degrees Celsius by the year 2100 with a decline in rainfall and reduced water availability (UNDP, 2007:93). The Government through the ASWAp has realised the existence and the extent of these challenges. This has been evident in the development of the Land and Water management and also the Food Security and Risk Management pillars within ASWAp which have been tailor made to respond to some of the issues coming as a result of climate change. Though ASWAp has generally been accused of not been climate smart, as it still not clear on issues like reduction of agricultural emissions, which are among the top sources of greenhouse gases, through its provisions on use of diesel powered irrigation pumps and do not give a proper strategy of conservation agriculture and other conventional climate smart techniques. However the point of departure from this argument is that the ASWAP has realised the effects of climate change like floods, drought, animal and crop pest and diseases infestation on agriculture though these are not new issues and have been addressed in one way or another through the policies. However, their current extent and the magnitude as a result of climate change have necessitated a policy response, which we have seen in ASWAp. For the agriculture sector in Malawi, it is the changes in rainfall regimes that will be a dominant climate factor affecting agricultural production. The changes in rainfall patterns will have great consequences on: soil surface run-off, soil erosion, soil-water availability, floods, droughts, groundwater recharge and storage, water quality, water demands for irrigation, crop and domestic uses, and a whole range of other environmental and economic activities (Dandaula, 2008, Banda and Ng’ambi, 2007). Having noted that these challenges that are to a greater extent reversing the progress that has been made in combating the problem of perennial hunger in Malawi, the Government has initiated the Greenbelt Initiative that will utilise all perennial water sources for irrigation. 9 4.2.3 The Civil Society The civil society, who in this case constitute the NGOs, Faith-based Organisation, Community Based Organisations, farmer organisations and interested individuals working in the agricultural sector, have mainly pointed out to the need to have a policy framework that will provide some guidelines for mainstreaming climate change in all agricultural policies. Though the civil society agrees with the Government on the fact that climate change effects are generally not new but the main concern now is the frequency and the severity at which they are taking place and how destructive and costly they have become to agriculture in recent years of which the Government is also agreeing to. It has also been observed that the spatial distribution of these effects has increased with areas that never used to have drought or floods and in some cases diseases like malaria are now experiencing them. This alone is a cause for concern that needs some policy consideration. Most civil society organisations have highlighted on the fact that the challenges that are being faced in the policy arena such as harmonisation of the work across ministries and also the overlaps and duplication of efforts being done, could be lessened if the Government could provide clear guidelines on how to mainstream climate change activities into development programmes. We believe that with the coming of the Ministry responsible for Climate Change will coordination challenges will be lessened. This is also coupled with the process currently taking place to develop a comprehensive climate change policy for Malawi. In order to enhance its ability to advocate for policy change and policy inclusion of climate change issues, the civil society has responded by forming a coalition on climate change called Civil Society Network on Climate Change, that is made up of NGO’s, networks and farmer organisations interested in climate change and it is being led by CEPA. The main aim of this coalition is to develop communities that are resilient to impacts of climate change by among others, proving them space in policy debates. Some of the initiative will includes reducing vulnerability to climate change, disaster risk reduction, adaptation and mainstreaming climate change in government policies, plans and strategies. It aims at achieving this through research and policy analysis, lobbying and advocacy, capacity building and information sharing. The existing networks also like the Civil Society Agriculture Network (CISANET) have modified their structures to incorporate issues of climate change by coming up with thematic groups that will deal directly with climate change and disaster management and policy advocacy. CISANET is a signatory of the CAADP compact and is also present in all the Technical committees of ASWAp and an important player in as far as its implementation is concerned. In addition to direct policy advocacy, the civil society is also engaged in other social protection and climate related disaster risk reduction initiatives, which are an important part of the ASWAp Framework . The National Association for Smallholder Farmers in Malawi (NASFAM), which is part of CISANET, is the largest grouping of smallholder farmers in Malawi. NASFAM has also initiated the weather indexed crop insurance programme1 which is being implemented in conjunction with the Insurance Association of Malawi and the Opportunity Bank. Through this initiative farmers are cushioned against the impact of a drought or other climate related disasters that may disrupt their 1 http://www.microinsurancecentre.org/UploadDocuments/Malawi%20Index%20linked%20crop%20insurance% 20project1.pdf 10 agricultural production. This insurance enables them to assess loans from the bank to buy improved seed. Other NGOs like World Vision International, Action Aid International, Concern Worldwide and Catholic Relief Services have also responded to climate change through various programmes on food security and disaster management in line with the some of the provisions in the ASWAp. 4.2.4 Media In most cases the media as the outlet for information do not have a particular position or specific narratives on general issues like climate change. One journalist from the private Zodiak Radio who was interviewed2 as part of this write up said that public and private media stations are usually influenced in their reporting by their political inclinations. Though all of them claim to be neutral, it is still the political forces that determine the emphasis that is put on news items, mostly the emphasis on the news item is based on the narratives of the dominant political players to which the news outlet is sympathetic of. However in the print media, though the trend may be the same but it is a bit different as the print media goes for news that will make their papers or magazines sell. In all these situations, stories on climate change have not taken a centre stage both as a political issues or something that will make newspapers sell. In other words there is no political crisis due to climate change worth taking about as a news headline. However, some NGOs that are interested in climate change issues like CEPA, Total Land Care and FAIR have been sponsoring radio programs that talks of climate issues and campaigns on sustainable agriculture. They have brought into discussion on these issues officials from the Government and civil society, however the viewpoints raised in these forums does not reflect what the radio stations stands for. This also goes for the TV stations and other public and private radio stations. However the media has been included as an important actor due to the influence that they have on policy change. 4.1.4 Private sector The private sector involvement in climate change issues has been very remote. Of late, one notable involvement has been through the weather indexed crop insurance programme that is being spearheaded by National Association of Smallholder Farmers in Malawi (NASFAM). This programme has brought together members from the private sector like the Opportunity International Bank of Malawi (OIBM), Malawi Rural Finance Company (MRFC), Monsanto and the Insurance Association of Malawi (IAM) who have signed a memorandum of understanding with NASFAM. Agriculture is a risky business and most farmers have no collateral to cover their loans, most banks were not willing to give out loans to farmers. However, this programme is providing some security to farmers against the effects of climate change like drought and floods. OIBM and MRFC have agreed to provide loans to the farmers provided they buy an insurance policy with IAM and their seed (mostly groundnut) from Monsanto and sell their harvest to NASFAM which gives then an above market price. The success of this programme has made Government to look at the possibility of extending it to other crops like maize and rice. Climate change has opened up business opportunities for some. Other members of the private sector that are doing something about climate change include companies like Electricty Supply Commission of Malawi and the Water Boards which are undertaking several climate change adaptation activities with the local communities to safeguard hydro electricity generation capacity and water supplies respectively. Others are into research on alternative fuels like biodiesel from Jatropha and ethanol powered vehicles (Jumbe et al., 2009). All these organizations have seen the link between their work and the climate change and how it is positively or negatively affecting them. 2 Interviewed, Mr. Owen Lupeska of Zodiak Radio station 11 4.1.5 The donors The donor community has been the powerful ‘off stage’ driving force in the policy debates taking place in Malawi on climate change. The visible pressure on government to make agricultural policy responsive to climate change has mainly been provided by the civil society networks and NGOs with the notable ones being Oxfam, CADECOM and Action Aid. However, behind the scene have been organisations like NORAD, Trocaire, Christian Aid, DFID, Irish Aid, World Bank and the EU providing the financial support to these organisations to put through policy reforms. The EU has been involved for sometime in the Malawi agriculture policy arena through the Food Security Joint Taskforce in the Ministry of Agriculture that was set up after the 2000/2001 food crisis to coordinate the efforts aimed at providing some structural reforms that were absent in the pre-crisis period and among them was the drafting of the national food security policy. Though climate change has not yet taken a centre stage through this taskforce but a DFID funded Malawi Vulnerability Assessment Committee (MVAC) which assesses the vulnerability of the masses to food insecurity has been reporting in the taskforce meetings on the effects of climate change in agriculture and on the need for policy response. The donor community generally has been pushing for some of the international narratives on climate change onto the local context. 4.1.6 The academia/research The academia especially the University of Malawi through the Centre for Agricultural Research and Development (CARD) and the Centre for Social Research (CRS) have been doing some research on policy in agriculture and environment. However, there is currently very little research being carried out on climate change in Malawi that could feed into the debates taking place. Most of the viewpoints being raised are from studies and experiences taking place elsewhere. Jumbe et al. (2009) reported that these institutions lack capacity and enough resources to carry out research on climate change and other related issues that are relevant to the Malawi context. However there have been some efforts to build the capacity of these institutions. One such example is the IDRC funded Climate Change Adaptation in Africa program that is being coordinated by the Institute of Development Studies and implemented in Malawi by Chancellor College and it aims at helping the researchers understand the policy process involved in climate change. The LEAD trust and Malawi Environmental Endowment Trust (MEET) have also conducted and funded some research on climate change mitigation and adaptation. The civil society organisations and the NGOs like Oxfam and Action Aid have also commissioned several research studies on climate change in agriculture in Malawi that have helped to shape their programmes and activities on the ground. 4.2 Politics of Policy and Spaces for Engagement The climate change policy debate in Malawi is currently being mostly driven by the donor community. The front runners among the donors being NORAD, EU and the World Bank. This has largely been through the funding they are providing to the civil society networks for policy advocacy but also to Government departments for policy reviews and also on development programmes. However, it has also been observed in recent times, that the Government is opening up and showing a bigger interest in tackling issues of climate change at the policy level. This has been evident with the recent proclamation by the president of Malawi in his speech during the parliament opening session, that tackling climate change will be high among the priorities of Malawi Government this year. 12 Additionally, there have also been several efforts from the Government, which among other include the finalisation in the development of National Adaptation Plan of Action (NAPA), which is the national strategic plan in the implementation of adaptation activities. However, the development process of the NAPA was accused by some quarters especially the civil society as being closed and top down where a few elites drafted it with minimal consultation with the grassroots (Action Aid, 2009). The government has made efforts to open up the policy space in climate change. Recently, the Government has developed a taskforce in the Department of Environmental Affairs that will coordinate most of the activities and consultations on climate change policy. This taskforce will provide a space where the government, donors, private sector and the civil society, interested in climate and environment will interact and share information on climate change. However, the lack of sufficient capacity on climate change issues at almost all levels still remains the major limitation in Malawi in as far as policy development in climate change is concerned. It has been observed through a study conducted by the Centre for Environmental Policy Advocacy (CEPA) that most of the people entrusted with policy making and also those that are implementing programmes on climate change both in Government and the NGOs, do not have much knowledge of climate change and its effects on the environment (CEPA, 2009). This problem has also been exacerbated to some extent by the lack of sectoral coordination on climate change issues as there is no clear policy framework that may guide sectoral policies in mainstreaming climate change. The current overarching policy documents like the Vision 2020 and the Malawi Growth and Development Strategy (MGDS), do not say much on climate change while the NAPA has much of its focus on adaptation as opposed to mitigation and does not provide a clear framework for mainstreaming climate change. But what are the spaces available in Malawi for policy change? As already pointed out, the Malawi political environment has provided lots of opportunities and spaces for popular involvement in policy making processes and implementation. This has necessitated the formation of several structures both in Government and the civil society where policy issues are debated and the contributions from the grassroots are supposedly incorporated into the policies. However, in the current climate change policy scenario, it still remains to be seen as to how the power relations between the donors, who have the funds and the technical expertise and the government, which is mandated to make and implement policy, will shape the whole climate change discourse in Malawi. The civil society, on the other hand has also created their own spaces for actors engagement in policy debates. They have done this by the formation of the Civil Society Network on Climate Change and also the proposal of a climate change and disaster management thematic group within the Civil Society Agriculture Network (Phiri and Saka, 2008). It still remains to be seen how these networks will be influential in their dealing with Government and how much are they going to influence budgetary allocation to climate change activities. The media has of late also provided some spaces for popular participation in climate change debates. Though climate change has not been newsworthy especially for the print media as climate change articles have been clearly absent in the newspapers and magazines, the electronic media especially the radio and the TV have taken a reading role in informing and conducting discussion on climate change. The TV Malawi, for instance, has its programme called chilengedwe (The environment) which tackles all issues concerning the environment ranging from agriculture, desertification and afforestation among others and it talks with people from all levels such as farmers up to policy makers. The radio especially the Malawi Broadcasting Corporation and the private Zodiak Radio station have also been in the forefront to educate and inform on climate change especially through the farm radio initiative. 13 Since the climate change debates are relatively new in the Malawi policy arena, it remains to be seen as to what politics will shape the debates as they unfold and which spaces will open up or close down with time. With reference to the Gaventa power cube (Gaventa, 2007) which shows the relationship between power, spaces and level at which power is exercised, the donors and to some extent the international NGOs operates at both the local and global levels in as far as climate change policy is concerned. However, it has been observed that in most cases, in Malawi, the donors and the international NGOs do not get directly involved in policy debates but facilitates and work through local actor networks to exert their hidden power and push through their ideologies into policy. Most powerful networks like CISANET, Farmers Union of Malawi and the National Association for Smallholder Farmers have the backing of NGOs like Action Aid and Oxfam. Donors, like the World Bank, NORAD, Irish Aid and the European Union have also influenced policy through civil society networks. 4.3.0 A quick overview of some of the Agricultural and Environmental policies in relation to climate change 4.3.1 Preamble The Malawi agricultural sector has generally a well structured policy environment with well articulated long term, medium term and short term policies in place and most of these policies have been well aligned to international policies like the UN Millennium Development Goals and the NEPAD’s CAADP. The long term overarching policy document in Malawi is the Vision 2020 which was developed in 1998. It provides a focus of development in Malawi and also the basis upon which national strategies and programmes are to be developed. The Vision 2020 states that “by the year 2020 Malawi as a God fearing nation, will be secure, democratically mature, environmentally sustainable, self-reliant with equal opportunities for and active participation by all, having social services, vibrant cultural and religious values and a technologically driven middle-income economy”. In the medium term, Malawi has the Growth and Development Strategy (MGDS) which is a single reference document for policy makers in Government, the Private Sector, Non Governmental Organizations and Cooperating Partners on Government’s socio-economic development priorities for Malawi for the next five years from 2006/07 to 2010/2011 fiscal years. However, before the MGDS was developed, Malawi had two other medium term overarching policy documents which were the Malawi Poverty Reduction Strategy (MPRSP) and the Malawi Economic Growth Strategy (MEGS) that have all phased out. The MGDS presents a policy framework that articulates issues related to both economic growth and development. However in its five themes, the MGDS do not explicitly articulate how Government intends to tackle climate change at local level. Although some of the clauses in the document like theme two on social protection and disaster management outline some of the strategies being used internationally in climate change adaptation, theme one, sub-theme three on food security is silent on how agricultural policies will be responsive to climate change. Recently the Government has developed and launched the policy framework for the agriculture sector Agriculture Sector Wide Approach (ASWAP) and it has been designed in line with the four pillars of Comprehensive African Agriculture Development Programme (CAADP). The ASWAp is the only major policy document in the agricultural sector that has made mention of climate change though it has not provided for a clear outline of how climate change in agriculture should be dealt with in the short term to medium term. However in the documents there are other proposed interventions that may help to mitigate the effects of climate change and they include 14 among others: Improvement of early warning systems and weather insurance, increased use of irrigation, protection of catchment areas and other fragile areas such as wetlands and river banks, developing and implementing strategies for drought preparedness, developing small dams to harvest water, use of recommended improved crop varieties that are resistant to drought, improved knowledge and understanding on how temperature profiles in the lake disrupt fish breeding and survival, ensuring watershed protection mainly by community-based afforestation including fruit tree planting. However, what are some of the particular policies saying on issues related to climate change in agriculture? 4.3.2 National Irrigation Policy and Development Strategy The Malawi Government adopted a National Irrigation Policy and Development Strategy (NIPDS) in June 2000 and it is supported by an Irrigation Act that was passed in 2001. The major justification of this policy was to increase the food production outputs in the wake increasing population by utilising the vast water bodies and resources that Malawi has. It is clear that the framers of this policy had no climate change in mind because it is not mentioned anywhere in the document, in other words combating climate change was not the central theme in this policy. However, the policy has recognised the importance of drought, which has recently become a common feature resulting from climate change as one issue that needs to be addressed through irrigation. Climate change is also increasing the water stress on many rural households who have seen rivers and wells drying, the policy spells out on water rights, on how water from rivers and dams will be used for irrigation against the increasing human needs for the same water resources. Even though climate change is not the major theme of the policy, climate change mitigation and adaptation issues have taken a central role through the strategies spelt out in the policy document. Of late there has been a clear response to climate change through irrigation when the Government announced the introduction of the National Greenbelt Programme, this programme will supplement other initiatives aimed at Malawi being a food self-sufficient country. 4.3.3 National Environmental Policy and Action Plan Malawi developed and launched its National Environmental Action Plan (NEAP) which came as a result of the Earth Summit in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil in 1992. This policy document was launched in 1994. NEAP became the Malawi’s operational tool for the implementation of the Agenda 21 and it identifies several environmental problems that needed some coordinated efforts between several sectors. As listed its chapter 3.2.2, these include high soil erosion, low soil fertility, deforestation, overgrazing, over-fishing, loss of biodiversity, water resources degradation and depletion, human habitat degradation, air pollution, and climate change. Following NEAP, Malawi developed the National Environmental Policy (NEP) which was adopted in 1996 and was followed by the Environment Management Act. The NEP as revised in 2004 addresses climate change in section 4.11 dealing with Air Quality and Climate Change. The policy objective under this section is to minimize the adverse impact of climate change and variability. Among its key strategies is the need to strengthen the existing national climate and metrological database and monitoring networks; assess and monitor the potential impact of climate change on the functioning of ecosystems, vegetation patterns and net carbon sinks. As a framework instrument the NEP is expected to guide lead agencies in agriculture, fisheries, forestry, energy, industry and water resources management in so far as their activities affect the environment and natural resources management are concerned. 15 4.3.4 The Malawi National Strategy for Sustainable Development The Malawi National Strategy for Sustainable Development (MNSSD) was developed and adopted in 2004, provides more concrete actions for implementing the principles in the NEP.. The MNSSD addresses climate change under theme 3 of the Johannesburg Plan of Implementation of the World Summit on Sustainable Development (WSSD). The theme deals with the protection and management of the natural resources base of economic and social development. It calls upon states to improve management of effects of climate change and variation. The NSSD stipulates the WSSD goals which specifically deal with weather and climate. The major goals under the MNSSD include the need to reduce damage to property and loss of life caused by weather and climate natural disasters (floods, disasters); contribute to the sustainable production of food and fibre, contribute to sustainable industrial production and meet the UNFCCC obligations. Again the generation and dissemination of reliable weather and climate information is key for disaster early warnings, public awareness, agriculture production, industrial use and water resources management. The key strategies include procurement and installation of necessary equipment and training, promoting awareness among vulnerable groups, among others. The lead institution is Ministry of Transport and Public Works especially the Department of Meteorological Services. 4.3.5 The National Water Policy The National Water Policy provides a basis for sustainable water resources management and in this respect calls for the formulation of mitigation measures to reduce the impact of climate change and variability as a means of disaster preparedness and management. Disaster management is specifically addressed and recognizes the severe economic and cultural disruption and dislocation facing the most vulnerable population of the affected communities. The policy seeks to establish preparedness and contingency plans for water related disasters and emergencies, as an integral part of water resources management. Amongst the objectives and strategies are timely provision of portable water and sanitation, information dissemination, flood warnings and providing information to the Ministry responsible for disaster preparedness and relief. 4.3.6 National Biodiversity Policy and Action Plan In response to the country’s obligations under the Convention on Biological Diversity, Malawi adopted a National Biodiversity Policy and Action Plan (NBSAP) in 2005 which outlines key biodiversity issues and specific interventions by various stakeholders. Of particular concern to climate change are strategies for species monitoring and recovery, conservation of traditional agrobiodiversity resources, conservation of aquatic and mountain biodiversity that provide local communities with significant livelihood options for food security, medicine and other uses. As pointed out earlier on the major sectoral policies and acts in agriculture like the ones on crops and livestock are silent on climate change. However, it has been observed that most environmental policies have made mention of climate change though not as a central theme in those policies. This has been evident on the fact that while climate change is mentioned, no specific activities or implementation time lines are given. Jumbe et al (2008) observed that most of Malawi policy documents are not costed and as such suggested activities do not come with a budgetary allocation vote and this has made implementation difficult in the absence of resources and competing priorities. 16 However climate change is mentioned in some key government policies as mentioned earlier (e.g ADP and Water Policy), but it has also been observed that in these policies no specific strategies have been developed for climate change adaptation in sector activities. Nevertheless, since most of the current climate change problems are to do mainly with floods and drought and all the challenges around these, government should invest more through the national budget around these issues. 4.3.7 National Adaptation Plan of Action (NAPA) Malawi became one of the first countries in Africa to finalise and launch its National Adaptation Plan of Action (NAPA) in March 1996. The NAPA document was developed to enable Malawi address her urgent and immediate adaptation needs caused by climate change and extreme weather events. Specifically, it aims at: (i) identifying a list of priority activities, (ii) formulating priority adaptation options, (iii) building capacity for adapting to longer-term climate change and variability, and (iv) raising public awareness on the urgency to adapt to the adverse effects of extreme weather events. The NAPA was developed after evaluating the impacts of adverse climatic conditions in eight important sectors of the economy that directly supports growth. The identified areas were ranked using a multi-criteria analysis to arrive at a list of fifteen urgent and immediate priority needs for adaptation. The sectors that were analyzed are agriculture, water, human health, energy, fisheries, wildlife, forestry and gender. In all these areas, the current situation analysis was done, the challenges were identified and the possible interventions for adaptation were proposed. The NAPA provides a good basis that could be utilised in adaptation program design and also policy frameworks. 5.0 Conclusion and Policy recommendations Climate change has generally been accepted as a challenge and one of the greatest obstacles to the development of agriculture around the world. It has been responsible for crop productivity failures for most rain fed agriculture especially in the southern part of the world. Climate change has also been responsible for most of the disasters like floods and droughts that have led to the destruction of most rural livelihoods and exacerbated the levels of poverty. This has led to a call for renewed efforts in making agriculture, which is source of livelihood for many, to be as adaptive as possible to this phenomenon. This paper made an attempt to analyse the policy environment around climate change in the agricultural sector in Malawi by analysing the actors and their narratives on climate change and also the space and the politics that are surrounding the debates taking place. It has therefore been observed that in Malawi, there are a lot of activities taking place around agricultural policy and climate change that has seen the rise of the civil society in demanding for policy change in agriculture to have climate change as a central theme in most the policies. However there are several structural challenges that have been observed in relation to policy reform in the agricultural sector around climate change. The civil society observed that there is no policy framework available and it needs to be put in place to help the harmonisation of agricultural policies as they will be incorporating climate change in their sub-sectors. The ASWAp provides some oversights of climate change and its effects in agriculture but does not provide a clear outline of how such issues can be incorporated into sectoral policies. For instance, there are other ‘old and rigid’ policies like the crop production policy. This policy is crop specific and does not provide any room for flexibility to incorporate such things as climate change and their effects on crops and how policy will respond to such issues. Such policies need a complete overhaul to respond to the current needs. 17 However the pace of change has also been slow because of the Governments reluctance to fully accept climate change as an urgent need. Though their argument of tackling climate change indirectly by looking more on climate change effects that policy is already addressing may make sense however the level of budgetary allocation to such activities is still not encouraging. For instance, the Department of Irrigation has been receiving less than half of its budgetary needs for the past five years and most of its planned activities have not taken place (CISANET, 2009). It has also been observed that at the moment, there are no clear and concrete positionalities that have been developed as the actors are still in the process of analysing the effects of climate change in their sectors. Though the civil society and the government seem to have taken their stand but there are still divisions within themselves, among government ministries and among NGOs. However it is expected that with the coming in of the NGO coalition on climate change, this will help the NGOs to speak with one voice and develop common narratives on the climate change problem. Likewise, the formation of the taskforce in the Department of Environmental Affairs could facilitate some coordination within Government to develop clear narratives and policy positions on climate change. On the politics and spaces for engagement around climate change policy debates, it has been observed that the spaces are opening up, within the civil society arena but also there is some dialogue taking place between Government and the civil society. On the other hand, the media and the private sector, though they have not taken an active role in the debates, there has been an increased interest in climate change as both of them are seeing their niche and their relevance in the whole discourse. The donor community has also been supporting technically and financially to the efforts that are being done. However, there has not been much involvement of the Parliamentary Committee on Agriculture and Natural Resources in all these debates. Their absence may be understandable as the general elections have just taken place. Some studies carried out have suggested that there will be a need to come up with a particular parliamentary portfolio committee on climate change so as to give the whole climate change debate a more political face (Saka and Phiri, 2008). What are some of the issues that need to be considered as the debates are going on how to modify the policies in agriculture. 5.1 Public Awareness of Climate Change Issues As pointed out earlier on, most people are aware of the weather extremes taking place, however most of them are not aware that this is part of a bigger picture of global warming, hence climate change and food insecurity. Local capacity needs to be build as this will help the grassroots to be more aware of climate change and fully contribute to policy debates as more and more spaces are opening up for them. As the local people have been adapting to climate change for centuries, there is also need for policy makers to make sure that there is a proper integration in the development of such things as early warning systems between the technical and scientific outputs coming out of the National Meteorological Services and community based systems in the local planning. Technical advances of early warning must not be used to undermine traditional knowledge, the two should work together to enhance community understanding of the cases of the impacts and improve mechanisms for prevention, mitigation and adaptation. It is, therefore, recommended to intensify public awareness campaigns, education and training of all stakeholders, especially the most vulnerable, such as women and girls. One way of doing this is by mainstreaming climate change messages in agricultural extension. 5.2 Strengthen the Role the Non-state Actors The non state actors especially the NGOs and the private sector (small Agro-dealers) are the groups that work directly with the farming communities and have first hand information on the people’s 18 predicament when droughts and/or floods strike, and the human suffering that follows as people go hungry for days on end. It is recommended that NGOs and other non-state actors should continue to assist rural communities in addressing climate change issues at community level. However, it is also recommended that the capacity of these NGO’s should be enhance for them to fully understand the climate change and the process involved in climate change policy and advocacy work. This will also help them to work properly with the grassroots as they are integrating their voices into policy advocacy campaigns. Donors could play an important role in this capacity building process by providing the funding and also the technical support. 6.0 References Action Aid (2006). Climate Change and smallholder farmers in Malawi: understanding the poor people’s in climate change adaptation. http://www.actionaid.org.uk/doc_lib/malawi_climate_change_report.pdf . Banda. G; N’gambi. M (2007). Policy framework for sustainable agriculture in Malawi: Challenges and Opportunities in Naerstad A (2007: ed) Africa Can Feed Itself. 197-213. http://www.agropub.no/asset/2636/1/2636_1.pdf Bie. S.W; Mkwambisi. D; Gonani. M (2007). Climate Change and Rural Livelihood in Malawi: Review study report of Norwegian Support to FAO and SCC in Malawi, with a note of regional complication. http://www.nai.uu.se/events/conferences/archives/african_agriculture/bie.pdf . CEPA (2006). Climate Change and Rural Livelihoods: Review of Policy on Adaptation of Small-Scale Farmers in Malawi. Study report submitted to Action Aid, Lilongwe, Malawi Chinsinga. B (2007) Decentralisation and Poverty Reduction in Malawi – A critical appraisal in Crawford and Hartmann (2007. ed) Decentralisation in Africa. A Pathway out of Poverty and Conflict. 73 – 106. Amsterdam University Press. Chirwa, E W., Kumwenda. I, Jumbe J, Chilonda P, Minde. I (2007) ‘Agricultural Growth and Poverty Reduction in Malawi: Past Performance and Recent Trends’. Paper submitted to the Regional Strategic Analysis and Knowledge Support Systems, Southern Africa (ReSAKSS-SA), September 2007 CISANET (2009). National Agriculture 2007/2008 Budget Monitoring Report. Design Printers. Lilongwe, Malawi Cornwall. A; Coelho. V (2007). Spaces for Change? The Politics of Participation in New Democratic Arena. Gutenberg Press. Malta Dandaula. H.E (2008) Climate Change Scenarios in Malawi. Annual Evaluation Report, Climate Change Enabling Activities Project. Submitted to the Department of Environmental Affairs. Lilongwe, Malawi. Davies. M; Bruce. G; Leavy. J; Mitchell. T; Tanner. T (2009). Climate Change Adaptation, Disaster Risk Reduction and Social Protection: Complementary Role in Agriculture and Rural Growth? IDS Working Paper Vol 2009 No 320 Devereux. S; Edwards. J. (2004). Climate Change and Food Security. IDS Bulletin Vol 35 No 3: 22-30 Devereux. S; Vaitla. B; Swan. S (2008). Seasons of Hunger: Fighting Cycles of Quiet Starvation among the Worlds Poor. Pluto Press. London Field. C.R. (2005). Where there is no Development Agency. A manual for pastoralists and their promoters. NR International, Aylesford, Kent, UK. Gaventa. J (2006). Finding the spaces for change: A Power Analysis. IDS Bulletin Vol 37 No 6: 23-32 Government of Malawi (1994) National Environmental Policy and Action Plan, Department of Environmental Affairs, Lilongwe Malawi. Government of Malawi (2000) National Irrigation Policy and Development Strategy, Ministry of Irrigation and Water Development, Lilongwe, Malawi Government of Malawi (2004) The Malawi National Strategy for Sustainable Development. Department of Environmental Affairs. Lilongwe, Malawi. 19 Government of Malawi (2004) The National Water Policy. Ministry of Irrigation and Water Development, Lilongwe, Malawi Government of Malawi (2005) Malawi Growth and Development Strategy, Ministry of Economic Planning and Development, Lilongwe, Malawi. Government of Malawi (2005) National Biodiversity Policy and Action Plan. Department of Environmental Affairs, Lilongwe, Malawi Government of Malawi (2006) National Adaptation Plan of Action, Department of Environmental Affairs, Lilongwe, Malawi. Government of Malawi (2008), The Agricultural Development Programme, Ministry of Agriculture and Food Security, Lilongwe, Malawi. Hulme. M; Doherty. R; Ngara. T; New. M; Lister, D. (2001). African climate change: 1900- 2100. Climate Research 17, 145-168. IPCC (2007) Climate Change 2007: impacts, adaptation and vulnerability. Working Group II contribution to the Fourth Assessment Report of the IPCC, UNEP and WMO. http://www.ipcc.ch/publications_and_data/publications_ipcc_fourth_assessment_report_wg2 _report_impacts_adaptation_and_vulnerability.htm . Jumbe. C; Wiyo. K; Njewa. E; Msiska. B.M (2008) The role of government, donors, civil society and the private sector in climate change adaptation in Malawi : Scoping Study. http://www.preventionweb.net/files/8926_CC20Gov20MalawiDiscussionPaper1.pdf. Keeley. J; Scoones. I (2003) Understanding Environmental Policy Processes. Earthscan, UK Mendelson R. (2000). Two Essays on Climate Change and Agriculture: Measuring the effects of climate change on developing country agriculture. FAO. Rome. http://www.fao.org/DOCREP/003/X8044E/X8044E00.HTM. Notenbaert. A; Thornton. P; Herrero. M (2006) Livestock development and climate change in Turkana district, Kenya. International Livestock Research institute. Discussion Paper No. 7. Targeting and Innovation. http://www.ilri.org/Infoserv/webpub/fulldocs/TargetDiscussionPaper_7/Turkana_discussionP aper_7.pdf . Oxfam (2009) The winds of change: Climate change, poverty and the environment in Malawi. http://www.oxfamireland.org/pdfs/policy_papers/climate-change-malawi.pdf Parry. M (1990). Climate Change and World Agriculture. Earthscan. London Parry. M; Rosenzweg. C; Iglesians. A; Fisher. G; Livermore M. (1999). Climate Change and World Food Security: New Assessment, Global Environmental Change, Vol 9: 51-67 Richards. P (1985). Indigenous Agricultural Revolution. Hutchinson & Co. London, United Kingdom Rowlinson, P. Steele M; Nefzaoui A, 2008. Adapting Livestock Production Systems to Climate Change –Temperate Zones. Livestock and Global Change conference proceeding. May 2008, Tunisia. http://www.mashreq-maghreb.org/documents/LGCC_proceedings.pdf. Saka .A.R; Phiri I.M.G (2008). Impact of Climate Change on Agriculture and Food Security in Malawi. A study report submitted to Action Aid, Lilongwe, Malawi Slater. S; Peskett. L; Ludi. E; Brown. D (2007). Climate change, agricultural policy and poverty reduction – how much do we know. Natural Resource Perspective 109. http://www.odi.org.uk/resources/download/1231.pdf . UNDP (2008). Human Development Report 2007/2008. Fighting Climate Change: Human Solidarity in a divided world. Macmillan. New York, USA 20 . Assessed on 6th July 2009 Oxfam 21