* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download Points made by Supporters Points made by Opponents
Climate governance wikipedia , lookup
Economics of global warming wikipedia , lookup
Climate change adaptation wikipedia , lookup
Climatic Research Unit email controversy wikipedia , lookup
Soon and Baliunas controversy wikipedia , lookup
Climate change in the Arctic wikipedia , lookup
Climate change in Tuvalu wikipedia , lookup
Climate change denial wikipedia , lookup
Climate sensitivity wikipedia , lookup
Climate change and agriculture wikipedia , lookup
Effects of global warming on human health wikipedia , lookup
Mitigation of global warming in Australia wikipedia , lookup
Climate change and poverty wikipedia , lookup
Effects of global warming on humans wikipedia , lookup
General circulation model wikipedia , lookup
Media coverage of global warming wikipedia , lookup
United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change wikipedia , lookup
Climate change in the United States wikipedia , lookup
Climatic Research Unit documents wikipedia , lookup
Effects of global warming wikipedia , lookup
Fred Singer wikipedia , lookup
Global warming controversy wikipedia , lookup
Future sea level wikipedia , lookup
Scientific opinion on climate change wikipedia , lookup
North Report wikipedia , lookup
Attribution of recent climate change wikipedia , lookup
Solar radiation management wikipedia , lookup
Surveys of scientists' views on climate change wikipedia , lookup
Politics of global warming wikipedia , lookup
Global Energy and Water Cycle Experiment wikipedia , lookup
Climate change, industry and society wikipedia , lookup
Global warming wikipedia , lookup
Effects of global warming on Australia wikipedia , lookup
IPCC Fourth Assessment Report wikipedia , lookup
Global warming hiatus wikipedia , lookup
Public opinion on global warming wikipedia , lookup
The Global Warming Debate: Points made by Supporters Points made by Opponents Rise in CO2 and other Greenhouse gases are anthropogenic – due to human activity. Historical Temperature records show an increase of 0.4-0.8°C in the last 100 years. This is an unusually warm period for the last 1000 years. CO2 is a first order forcing of Climate Change. Polar ice caps melting Glaciers melting Diseases spreading due to biome distribution changesmalaria in North America . Climate models can only reproduce the current trends if they use Greenhouse gas forcing, these models show that there will be warming and a rise of sea level. There will be long term ramifications, the effects of global warming will be felt centuries in the future Global temperatures are directly correlated with solar (sunspot - cycle) activity. Earth's climate has been both colder and warmer than today, and these periods are not explained by mechanisms that involve human influences. Malaria exixted in cooler climates Hockey Stick Controversy – Mann’s Flawed Data. Kyoto Protocol based on this data. Insects used to live in cold areas Climate Science can not make a definitive prediction yet, the computer climate models are weak and simplified. Thermometers only used since 1850s. IPCC draws conclusions from Climate models with acknowledged weakness in cloud physics schemes. There is a difference between correlation and causation. Just because people say that CO2 causes temperature increase doesn’t mean that temperature can not cause CO2 increase. 1 The Project The class will be divided into two large groups. The groups will be chosen at random to give presentations on one of the following beliefs: Some people believe that global warming is a real serious threat to our society, economically, socially, politically, and action must be taken immediately to try to alleviate it's effects. Others believe global warming to be a myth and any actions taken in response to global warming will be harmful to the economy and therefore society as a whole. The presentation can be made using any program and format and must have the following: 1. Opening statement about your belief. 2. Short video clip or other type of interesting visual that captures the audience interest. 3. Explanation of the Data - Everybody Participates : This is where each person chooses a particular part to research and explain. Use graphical and visual charts that clearly show what you are explaining. Cite and check validity of sources. For example National Geographic is much more reliable than Wikipedia. The other group can challenge you on validity of your source. 4. The data must be thoroughly explained to the audience which leads to a convincing argument supporting your belief. 5. Ending statement, summarizing your findings, data and your belief as well as what should be done in the next 20 years. 6. Everybody in the group must participate in the presentation. 7. Debate Questions and Answers : At the end of the presentation the group that is listening must challenge the group presenting with specific debate questions backed up by data. Must ask 4-6 questions. The total time limit on the presentation will be approximately 20-30 minutes( subject to change depending on student feedback) and will be split into two separate classes. You will need to organize the presentation so that it has a logical ending point for part a that is later concluded with part b in the next class. 2 9. Questioning – answering rules: Invariably questioning and answering will lead to heated debate and emotional arguing. So , for the sake of argument the following rules will be applied: Group 1 forms the question. Repeats the question to make it clear. Group 2 makes the answer then repeats answer to make it clear. Group 1 can “rebuttal” ONLY ONCE by stating flaws in answer. Group 2 can “rebuttal “ only once to defend their answer . If you keep rebutting back and forth on the same question then time is wasted to explore other questions and nothing is really accomplished. 10. Data : all sources of data are assumed valid. Neither group can claim that the other groups data is not valid. Otherwise people can just say that the data is not true and that is not the objective of the debate. The objective of the debate is to discuss the logical explanation of the data and find flaws in the reasoning. The sequence of the presentations will be as follows: Day 1 : Group 1 presentation Part a Group 2 presentation Part a Day 2 : Group 1 presentation part b Debate Questions from Group 2 to Group 1 Group 2 presentation part b Debate Questions from Group 1 to Group 2 3 SOME Background Resources that may help you on the Global Warming Debate Article below http://www.aos.wisc.edu/~aalopez/aos101/wk7.html Background on the Global Warming Debate As you may or may not know one of the more controversial topics in the world today is global warming. Some people believe that global warming is a serious threat to our society, economically, socially, politically, and action must be taken immediately to try to alleviate it's effects. Others believe global warming to be a myth and any actions taken in response to global warming will be harmful to the economy and therefore society as a whole. These are the extreme viewpoints. There are many who believe somewhere in the middle when it comes to global warming issues (such as, it's happening, but it is not a threat, or it can lead to minor problems, so let's find a way to adjust), and equally many who simply do not have an opinion. This week, part one of the Global Warming Debate, we will present the facts about global warming, the basic arguments presented by both sides, and the political climate with regards to global warming. You will be responsible for interpreting various viewpoints on an issue, and formulating your own opinion based on the facts, and the quality of the reasoning. It is perfectly possible for two people to look at the same facts, and hear the same arguments, and come to different conclusions about what needs to be done. So what is the problem? The problem is that the global average temperature has been rising in recent decades. NASAGoddard Institute for Space Studies has a page showing these changes of the global average temperature, as well as changes locations and in different seasons. The 2000 year temperature trend also shows the warmer temperatures this century. Many people believe this temperature change is associate with increases in carbon dioxide. This is because of the greenhouse effect. Some have criticized the validity of the data showing an increase in global mean temperature because satellite data has shown the opposite trend. However, this opposite trend is focused mainly on the temperatures in the upper atmosphere, whereas the surface temperature trends shown above are only for the surface. The next questions involve the actual relationship between greenhouse gases and temperature increases, as well as whether or not us humans are actually causing the greenhouse gases to increase. Some believe that climates will change significantly as a result of global warming. Look at a few examples in the Midwest, according to this link, Wisconsin summers in 2095 will be the equivalent of Arkansas summer now. This could lead to adverse conditions for certain species of plants and animals, disrupting the food supply, or in other cases, increase the length of the 4 growing season, adding to the food supply. Many also believe that global warming will lead to more disease being spread from the tropics, sea level rise as a result of melting polar ice caps, more hurricanes, and fires. See early warning signs. Feedback Loops There are many theories on Global Warming, some of which involve the ideas of feedback loops. A positive feedback loop is one that amplifies changes. An example of this the world's population. With a fixed birth rate, the population of the globe will continue to grow (until checked). Large populations cause large numbers of births and large numbers of births result in larger population. The change gets amplified each step. These feedback loops are dangerous. A negative feedback loop is one that tend to mitigate a change. An example of this is homeostasis, the maintenance of body temperature. As a person's body gets too hot, (s)he begins to sweat in an attempt to lower the temperature. If their body is too cool,(s)he will begin to shiver in an attempt to increase the temperature. Global warming is likely to be amplified by a few key positive feedback loops... 5 Ice and Snow As the earth warms, the levels of ice and snow decrease, this decreases the surface albedo, allowing for an increase in absorbed solar radiation at Earth's surface. This leads to more warming and less ice and snow cover. Water Vapor As the earth warms, so does the atmosphere, this increases the amount of water vapor the atmosphere can hold. Warmer temperatures mean more evaporation, leading to a higher amount of water vapor, the most powerful greenhouse gas in existence, and consequentially even higher temperatures. Three effects are poorly understood... 1. Changes in cloud cover could dampen the effects, especially if they are low clouds. Most climate models forecast that this will be the phenomenon that eventually brings the earth back to equilibrium. 2. Aerosols- CFCs may or may not counteract global warming. Some studies have shown aerosols to block out a significant amount of incoming solar radiation, others have not. 3. The ocean circulation may change leading to varying effects in different parts of the world. Although "The Day After Tomorrow" is not a plausible scenario, many scientists believe that although the earth will warm as a whole, some regions, especially western Europe, may cool as a result of weaker ocean circulation. These effects make global warming scenarios very different. 6 Political Landscape The political landscape is generally focused on whether or not action, such as the Kyoto Protocol, is necessary. The Kyoto protocol was signed in 1997, by almost all industrialized countries. It sets targets on reduction of greenhouse gas emissions. The key countries that did not sign are Australia and the United States of America. The key developing nations not involved in the KP are China and India. The main argument against the KP is that it will cost too much economically. Facts on the Kyoto Protocol What about the United States? The climate change activities currently underway at Federal agencies are a result of U.S. commitments under the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change, signed in 1992 by the Bush Administration and ratified that year by the Senate. The Framework Convention entered into force in 1994. Facts on the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change The debate mainly pits environmentalists against economists. A majority of environmentalists and scientists believe global warming is occurring and is an issue that needs to be dealt with. Environmentalists say that other species, even the dinosaurs, could have died off in the past as a result of climate change, and we could suffer the same fate. Read an article from this perspective A majority of economists and businesspeople, more concerned with the economy, do not see global warming as an issue. Economists often point to previous claims by scientists that turned out to be untrue or contradictory to the current consensus. 7