* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download - Sustainable Loudoun
Climate change mitigation wikipedia , lookup
Snowball Earth wikipedia , lookup
Climate change adaptation wikipedia , lookup
Economics of global warming wikipedia , lookup
ExxonMobil climate change controversy wikipedia , lookup
Climate governance wikipedia , lookup
General circulation model wikipedia , lookup
Climate change in Tuvalu wikipedia , lookup
Climatic Research Unit documents wikipedia , lookup
Climate-friendly gardening wikipedia , lookup
Soon and Baliunas controversy wikipedia , lookup
Heaven and Earth (book) wikipedia , lookup
Climate sensitivity wikipedia , lookup
Low-carbon economy wikipedia , lookup
Effects of global warming on human health wikipedia , lookup
Global warming controversy wikipedia , lookup
Global warming hiatus wikipedia , lookup
Climate change denial wikipedia , lookup
Climate change and agriculture wikipedia , lookup
Mitigation of global warming in Australia wikipedia , lookup
United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change wikipedia , lookup
Effects of global warming on humans wikipedia , lookup
Climate engineering wikipedia , lookup
Media coverage of global warming wikipedia , lookup
Citizens' Climate Lobby wikipedia , lookup
Instrumental temperature record wikipedia , lookup
Fred Singer wikipedia , lookup
Physical impacts of climate change wikipedia , lookup
Carbon Pollution Reduction Scheme wikipedia , lookup
Global warming wikipedia , lookup
Climate change and poverty wikipedia , lookup
Attribution of recent climate change wikipedia , lookup
Climate change in the United States wikipedia , lookup
Scientific opinion on climate change wikipedia , lookup
Climate change, industry and society wikipedia , lookup
Effects of global warming on Australia wikipedia , lookup
Public opinion on global warming wikipedia , lookup
Solar radiation management wikipedia , lookup
Politics of global warming wikipedia , lookup
Surveys of scientists' views on climate change wikipedia , lookup
Business action on climate change wikipedia , lookup
Into the Denier Den Tony Noerpel “If you have ever walked barefoot through a seaside mudflat, you’ve felt the mud squishing up through your toes, and perhaps saw bubbles forming as your feet sank into the mud. The bubbles are methane.” – Donald Canfield, Oxygen, a four billion year history, Princeton, 2014. A friend asked if I was familiar with an ecologist named Daniel Botkin and his book The Moon in the Nautilus Shell. It was a book club selection and my friend was curious why Botkin was agnostic about human-caused climate change (anthropogenic global warming, AGW); was Botkin a denier, a skeptic or correct about the science? I replied that if he had evidence he was a skeptic and if he didn’t he was in denial. There are three characteristics of scientific skepticism differentiating it from denial. 1. A skeptic is familiar with the argument in question. In the case of AGW this requires having read the IPCC reports. 2. A skeptic’s objections are themselves scientific, i.e., they are testable [1]. 3. A skeptic is willing to be wrong. The third distinction follows directly from the second. If one is proposing testable objections then one has to be willing to be wrong if the objections are falsified. I promised my friend I would review Botkin’s objections. Here is what Botkin writes on his web site [2]: “… one can only be rather agnostic about the role that human actions have played and are playing in climate change. A new, important paper in the journal Science casts some fascinating light on the question of whether carbon dioxide change precedes temperature change, and therefore is a likely cause of the temperature change, or whether temperature change precedes carbon dioxide change, casting doubt on the role of the greenhouse gas in climate change.” His objection to AGW theory is unusual but testable in two ways. The first Botkin hypothesis is that the timing of temperature change relative to carbon dioxide can be accurately determined by one sample in a 240,000 year old ice core and the second is that this lone result would falsify a vast expanse of settled science. Botkin’s first hypothesis is irrelevant to AGW theory but has been falsified. Botkin would have to provide extraordinary evidence to support his second hypothesis which he fails to do and which anyway nearly certainly does not exist. Pointedly, the burden is Botkin’s to provide evidence and he provides none. Both hypotheses are contradicted anyway by the conclusions in the only journal article Botkin cites; not a good start for him. We have known for more than 150 years since John Tindall’s famous experiments that carbon dioxide is a greenhouse gas [3] and that greenhouse gases have clearly played an important role in determining the climate during Earth’s history [4]. To cast doubt on the role of greenhouse gases to change the climate, one would have to question quantum mechanics and Maxwell’s equations as well as discover some other explanation for our existence and why the Earth isn’t frozen over solid and indeed find an alternate explanation for the entire paleoclimate history of Earth and Venus, a tall order and why climate skepticism is problematic. To make his “agnostic” case, Botkin relies on an article published in the journal Science in 2003 by Nicolas Caillon and colleagues [5]. This paper’s authors attempted to estimate the relative timing between the Antarctic climate change and the release of carbon dioxide into the atmosphere 240,000 years ago, Termination III shown in the figure. The authors estimate that the temperature rise in the Antarctic preceded the release of carbon dioxide into the atmosphere by about 800 years. This is the result Botkin used to cast “doubt on the role of the greenhouse gas in climate change.” Botkin’s first hypothesis that the timing estimate was accurate is irrelevant to AGW theory but it is interesting that the Caillon paper itself states: “The following conclusions … must be considered tentative.” For the record, another paper published in Science in 2009 by Drysdale et al. regards Termination II [6], corrects the timing of this event, 141,000 years ago, by about 10,000 years. During the Pleistocene the geological epoch spanning 2,588,000 to 11,700 years ago, the Earth experienced repeated glaciations some of which are shown in the figure. At the glacial maximums kilometers of ice covered New York while during the interglacial periods such as Termination III, most of Canada was ice free. It has been suspected since the work of John Croll in 1875 [7] that these ice age episodes were caused by variations in Earth’s orbit or Milankovich Cycles. Milutin Milankovic made a convincing case for this in 1941 [8] and it was confirmed in 1976 [9]. What was remarkable is that this repeated warming and cooling of the Earth’s climate tracks nearly exactly the rise and fall of atmospheric carbon dioxide and methane. In a word, the Earth’s carbon cycle represents a very strong positive feedback mechanism which would amplify any forcing function which might initiate climate change. Another paper published in the journal Nature in 2012 by Jeremy Shakun et al explains [10] that while Antarctic warming may have preceded the release of carbon dioxide into the atmosphere; the warming of the globe came after the release. The orbital redistribution of solar insolation initiated warming at the poles, which initiated a release of carbon dioxide which then caused the entire planet to warm. Caillon’s paper does not contradict that carbon dioxide is a greenhouse gas or question the role of greenhouse gases in determining the climate of a planet such as Earth. The Caillon paper states: “The situation at Termination III differs from the recent anthropogenic CO2 increase. As recently noted by Kump, we should distinguish between internal influences (such as the deglacial CO2 increase) and external influences (such as the anthropogenic CO2 increase) on the climate system. Although the recent CO2 increase has clearly been imposed first, as a result of anthropogenic activities, it naturally takes, at Termination III, some time for CO2 to outgas from the ocean once it starts to react to a climate change that is first felt in the atmosphere. The sequence of events during this Termination is fully consistent with CO2 participating in the latter 4200 years of the warming”. On his web site Botkin cites a second paper published after he wrote his book which addresses the timing uncertainty in the Caillon measurements. The later paper by Parrenin et al. [11] concerns itself with the most recent termination, the transition between the Last Glacial Maximum 22,000 years ago and the beginning of the Holocene 11,700 years ago. Since this is very recent, the timing of events is expected to be much more accurate than those reported by Caillon. Parrenin shows that the carbon dioxide was released into the atmosphere simultaneous with the warming of the Antarctic. This is as we expect and is probably also what happened 240,000 years ago. The release of carbon dioxide by a warming Earth was not just a contributor to the last half of the warming but center stage to the whole event. Thus Botkin’s hypothesis is falsified. If Botkin was scientifically skeptical of AGW theory and not simply in denial he would have done the mea culpa and admitted he had gotten it wrong, no big deal. We all make mistakes. Instead he compounds his mistake with obfuscating illogic. Why he does this is more a problem for cognitive psychology than climate physics. But it leaves no doubt that Botkin is in denial. The cognitive psychologist Daniel Kahan discusses denial in an outstanding lecture he delivered at Cambridge University [12]. Frankly we all tend to behave this way; it is a Homo sapiens design flaw. :+) Still I am sympathetic with what I generously think might be Botkin’s concern. The attention focused on global warming distracts us from all the other human misbehaviors. My own views correspond with those of the National Academy of Sciences [13]. “…habitat destruction, fragmentation, and over-exploitation, even without climate change, could result in a mass extinction within the next few centuries equivalent in magnitude to the one that wiped out the dinosaurs. With the ongoing pressures of climate change, comparable levels of extinction conceivably could occur before the year 2100” In 2010 a drought year, the net loss of carbon to the atmosphere from the Amazon was 500,000 tons. In 2011 a wet year the net loss was 50,000 tons [14]. The Amazon is no longer a sink for human emissions. Human-caused climate change and human-caused deforestation are now coherent and reinforcing. I cannot recommend Botkin’s book. His denial of AGW is a significant flaw. While there might be parts of his book that are worthwhile, it is unreliable and unless a reader has access to the original science the reader cannot separate the good from the bad. If the reader has access to the science then she does not need to read Botkin. Read Canfield’s “Oxygen” instead. Figure 1. Antarctic temperature and atmospheric carbon dioxide from Vostok Ice core http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/c/c2/Vostok-ice-core-petit.png [1] Karl Popper, The Logic of Scientific Discovery, originally published in 1935, I have the 2007 Routledge version. [2] http://www.danielbbotkin.com/2013/03/04/carbon-dioxide-and-temperature-who-has-led-whom/ [3] John Tyndall, On the absorption and radiation of heat by gases and vapours, and on the physical connexion of radiation, absorption, and conduction, Philosophical Magazine Series 4, 22, 169-194, 273285. [4] Raymond Pierrehumbert, Principles of Planetary Climate, Cambridge, 2010. [5] Caillon, et al, “Timing of Atmospheric CO2 and Antarctic Temperature Changes Across Termination Ill.” Science, 2003. 299: 1728–1731 [6] Drysdale et al, Evidence for Obliquity Forcing of Glacial Termination II, Science, Vol 325, 18 September, 2009. [7] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/James_Croll [8] Milankovitch, Milutin (1998) [1941]. Canon of Insolation and the Ice Age Problem. Belgrade: Zavod za Udz̆benike i Nastavna Sredstva. ISBN 86-17-06619-9.; see also "Astronomical Theory of Climate Change" [9] Imbrie and Imbrie, "Ice ages - solving the mystery", Harvard University Press, 1979 and Hays, J. D.; Imbrie, J.; Shackleton, N. J. (1976). "Variations in the Earth's Orbit: Pacemaker of the Ice Ages". Science 194 (4270): 1121–1132. doi:10.1126/science.194.4270.1121 . PMID 17790893 [10] Jeremy D. Shakun, Peter U. Clark, Feng He, Shaun A. Marcott, Alan C. Mix, Zhengyu Liu, Bette OttoBliesner, Andreas Schmittner & Edouard Bard, Global warming preceded by increasing carbon dioxide concentrations during the last deglaciation, Nature, Volume: 484, Pages: 49–54, 05 April 2012 DOI: doi:10.1038/nature10915 [11] Parrenin, et. al., “Synchronous Change of Atmospheric CO2 and Antarctic Temperature During the Last Deglacial Warming,” Science, 2013. 339: p. 1060 [12] http://www.sms.cam.ac.uk/media/1083337;jsessionid=24318FACA80319A17E5841ADF99EDF23 [13] http://www.nap.edu/catalog.php?record_id=18373 [14] Jennifer Balch, Drought and fire change sink to source, Nature, Vol 506, 6 February, 2014.