* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download Enzymes responsible for chlorate reduction by Pseudomonas sp
Community fingerprinting wikipedia , lookup
Amino acid synthesis wikipedia , lookup
G protein–coupled receptor wikipedia , lookup
Agarose gel electrophoresis wikipedia , lookup
Lipid signaling wikipedia , lookup
Biochemistry wikipedia , lookup
Signal transduction wikipedia , lookup
Magnesium transporter wikipedia , lookup
NADH:ubiquinone oxidoreductase (H+-translocating) wikipedia , lookup
Biosynthesis wikipedia , lookup
Protein–protein interaction wikipedia , lookup
Specialized pro-resolving mediators wikipedia , lookup
Protein purification wikipedia , lookup
Enzyme inhibitor wikipedia , lookup
Two-hybrid screening wikipedia , lookup
Metalloprotein wikipedia , lookup
Microbial metabolism wikipedia , lookup
Oxidative phosphorylation wikipedia , lookup
Gel electrophoresis wikipedia , lookup
Proteolysis wikipedia , lookup
Evolution of metal ions in biological systems wikipedia , lookup
FEMS Microbiology Letters 247 (2005) 153–159 www.fems-microbiology.org Enzymes responsible for chlorate reduction by Pseudomonas sp. are different from those used for perchlorate reduction by Azospira sp. Lisa M. Steinberg a, John J. Trimble b, Bruce E. Logan a a,* Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, 212 Sackett Building, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802, USA b Department of Biology, Saint Francis University, Loretto, PA 15940, USA Received 2 February 2005; received in revised form 29 April 2005; accepted 1 May 2005 First published online 17 May 2005 Edited by S. Silver Abstract Pseudomonas sp. PDA is an unusual bacterium due to its ability to respire using chlorate under aerobic conditions. The chlorate reductase produced by PDA was shown to be intrinsically different from the enzyme responsible for chlorate and perchlorate [(per)chlorate] reduction produced by Azospira sp. KJ based on subunit composition and other enzyme properties. The perchlorate reductase from strain KJ appeared to have two subunits (100 and 40 kDa) while the chlorate reductase from PDA had three subunits (60, 48, and 27 kDa). N-terminal amino acid sequencing of the 100 kDa protein from strain KJ showed a 77% similarity with the perchlorate reductase alpha subunit from another perchlorate-respiring bacterium, Dechloromonas agitata, while the N-terminus amino acid sequence of the 60 kDa protein from strain PDA did not show a similarity to previously isolated chlorate or perchlorate reductases. 2005 Federation of European Microbiological Societies. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. Keywords: Biodegradation; Chlorate reductase; Electron acceptor; Perchlorate reductase; Remediation; Respiration 1. Introduction The US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) estimates that the drinking water of 15 million people is affected by perchlorate contamination [1]. Perchlorate reducing bacteria have been isolated from a variety of natural environments, and are widely dispersed among a-, b-, c-, and e-subclasses of the Proteobacteria [2–4]. Members of two genera of the b-subclass of Proteobacteria, Dechloromonas and Azospira, are thought to represent the dominant perchlorate-reducing bacteria in the environment [5,6]. All bacteria capable of perchlorate respiration can respire using chlorate, but the reverse is not necessarily true. Bacteria capable of * Corresponding author. Tel.: +1 814 863 7908; fax: +1 814 863 7304. E-mail address: [email protected] (B.E. Logan). chlorate, but not perchlorate, respiration include members of Proteus, Pseudomonas, and Rhodobacter [2–4]. Oxygen is known to prevent chlorate reduction by all chlorate and perchlorate [(per)chlorate] reducing strains except for Pseudomonas sp. PDA [7]. Perchlorate and chlorate are sequentially reduced according to the same sequence of intermediates, via ClO 4 ! ClO3 ! ClO2 ! Cl þ O2 [8]. Chlorite dismutase catalyzes the disproportionation of chlorite to chloride and oxygen, and the oxygen that is produced is consumed for cell respiration and does not accumulate in solution [9]. In perchlorate-respiring bacteria a single enzyme is used for both chlorate and perchlorate reduction, but few enzymes have been isolated. Perchlorate reductases isolated from strains GR-1 [10] and perc1ace [11], and chlorate reductases from Ideonella dechloratans [12] and Pseudomonas chloritidismutans strain AW-1 [13] 0378-1097/$22.00 2005 Federation of European Microbiological Societies. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. doi:10.1016/j.femsle.2005.05.003 154 L.M. Steinberg et al. / FEMS Microbiology Letters 247 (2005) 153–159 all show some similarity to the selenate reductase of Thauera selenatis and to other reductases, dehydrogenases, and heme proteins based on sequencing data. However, these enzymes differ in their physical and biochemical properties, suggesting that a wide variety of enzymes may catalyze chlorate and perchlorate reduction. Pseudomonas sp. PDA is a relatively novel chloraterespiring bacterium due to its ability to completely degrade chlorate in the presence of dissolved oxygen [7]. While other chlorate respiring bacteria are known to constitutively express chlorite dismutase, no other bacterium is known to constitutively express both chlorite dismutase and chlorate reductase. In order to further examine this unique microorganism, we used native gel electrophoresis to isolate the chlorate reductase from strain PDA and the perchlorate reductase from strain KJ. In addition, partially purified enzymes from the periplasmic space of these two strains were used to compare enzyme properties. Chlorite reductase was not examined here as it has already been well characterized [2,9,14–16]. ally contained sucrose (0.75 M). Protease inhibitor cocktail (2.5 ml), lysozyme (100 mg), and EDTA (10 mM final concentration; all from Sigma) were added to each tube, and the tubes were shaken vigorously by hand for 2 to 3 s. Samples were incubated on ice in an anaerobic chamber for 2 h. All reagents except the protease inhibitor cocktail, EDTA, and lysozyme, were prepared and stored under anoxic conditions. Spheroplasts from tube A (observed using phase microscopy) were collected by centrifugation (2500g, 20 min) with the supernatant retained for use as the ‘‘periplasmic fraction’’. Spheroplasts were suspended in buffer (50 ml) with 10% (w/v) glycerol, and broken by sonification (on ice) for 1 min. Insoluble material was collected by centrifugation (40,000g, 10 min), with the supernatant collected as the ‘‘cytoplasmic fraction’’. Broken cells from tube B were treated in the same manner, with the supernatant collected as the ‘‘whole cell lysate’’. The insoluble material was resuspended in buffer (50 ml) with glycerol (10% w/v) and Triton-X 100 (1% w/ v) as the ‘‘membrane fraction’’. 2.2. Enzyme activity 2. Materials and methods 2.1. Bacterial strains and cell preparation Azospira sp. KJ (formerly Dechlorosoma sp. KJ) was isolated from an acetate-fed, perchlorate-degrading packed bed bioreactor and has been used in drinking water bioremediation tests [7,16–18]. KJ is a Gram-negative, facultatively anaerobic rod capable of coupling the oxidation of lactate or acetate to the complete reduction of nitrate, chlorate, or perchlorate. Pseudomonas strain PDA was isolated from primary digester sludge [17] and can grow on lactate or acetate using oxygen or chlorate, but not nitrate or perchlorate, although some nitrate reduction has been observed in cell-free suspensions [7]. Strain KJ is a member of the b-subclass of Proteobacteria, while PDA falls within the c-subclass (see Fig. 2 in [6]). Cells were prepared as whole cell lysate, periplasm, cytoplasm, and membrane fractions, and each fraction was tested for chlorate and perchlorate reduction. Cells were grown in basal medium [7] with NH4H2PO4 (6.1 mM). Strain KJ was grown using perchlorate (1.2 g/l) or chlorate (1.3 g/l) while strain PDA was grown using only chlorate (1.3 g/l). Cultures were grown with stirring in an anaerobic glove box at 30 C in 1 l capped media bottles, and harvested at an optical density (600 nm) of 0.7–0.8 (typically within 2–3 days). Cell suspensions were split into two 500 ml portions, centrifuged (10,000g, 5 min), and the pellets washed twice with buffer (Tris–HCl, 50 mM, pH 8.0; 100 ml). Both pellets (tubes A and B) were resuspended in 100 ml of buffer and 10% (w/v) glycerol, but tube B addition- Chlorate and perchlorate reductase activities (triplicate samples) were determined for each fraction using reduced methyl viologen assays [10]. Each 1 ml reaction mixture contained 0.5 mM methyl viologen, 0.35 mM sodium dithionite, and 10 to 100 ll of enzyme in MOPS buffer (50 mM, pH 8.0), which yielded a starting absorbance of approximately 1.0. The reaction was initiated by addition of the substrate (10 mM; chlorate or perchlorate), and activity quantified based on a linear decrease in absorbance at 600 nm (PalmSpec, Ocean Optics, Inc.; OOIBASE32 software) for 1 to 2 min in an anaerobic chamber with the rate corrected based on biotic controls (no substrate; duplicate samples). Abiotic controls containing no enzyme were also performed. A cytoplasmic marker, soluble malate dehydrogenase, was used to determine the extent of spheroplast rupture according to a standard assay [19]. Specific activity was defined as Units of activity per mass of protein (U/mg) based on the oxidation of 1 mmol of methyl viologen per min (600 nm). A previously determined millimolar extinction coefficient of 13 for methyl viologen at 600 nm was used to relate absorbance to concentration [20]. Protein concentrations were measured using the Bradford assay reagent (Sigma). Enzyme activities of periplasmic fractions were measured at set pH values of 6 to 6.5 using MES (2-(N-Morpholino) ethanesulfonic acid, pKa 6.1), 7 to 8 using MOPS (3-(N-Morpholino) propanesulfonic acid, pKa of 7.2), or 8.5 to 10 using CHES (2-(N-Cyclohexylamino) ethanesulfonic acid, pKa of 9.3) (all from Sigma). Buffers were prepared at 50 mM in deionized water, adjusted to a final pH using 1 M HCl or NaOH, and L.M. Steinberg et al. / FEMS Microbiology Letters 247 (2005) 153–159 degassed by stirring the solution for two days in an anaerobic chamber prior to use. 2.3. Isolation and N-terminal sequencing of perchlorate reductase enzymes Enzymes were separated by ammonium sulfate precipitation in an anaerobic chamber. Ammonium sulfate (saturated solution of 4.1 M in MOPS buffer; final concentration 20%, 40%, 55%, 67%, and 76% saturation) was dripped into the periplasmic fraction of samples with slow stirring for 10 min. The precipitate was collected by centrifugation (25,000g, 10 min) and the proteins were re-solubilized in 5 ml of MOPS buffer and analyzed for chlorate and perchlorate reductase activities using reduced methyl viologen assays. The protein fraction with the greatest enzyme activity was passed through an ultrafiltration membrane (Nanosep 30K membrane, Pall Corporation) and resuspended in 0.5 ml of 50 mM Tris–HCl buffer with glycerol (10% w/v), and mixed with 0.5 ml of Tris-Gly Native Sample Loading Buffer (NuPage, Invitrogen Life Technologies). Proteins were separated using agarose gels (0.8%; 15 cm wide by 10 cm long) by native gel electrophoresis (Sub-Gel GT Wide Mini submarine gel rig, Bio-Rad Laboratories) at 50 V (5 V/cm) for 4 h in 1· TAE buffer at a pH of 9.1 (strain PDA) or 7.2 (strain KJ). The location of chlorate and perchlorate reductase activities in the gels were determined using methyl viologen. Gels were placed in a tray and stained blue by reducing methyl viologen (2 mg/ml) with sodium dithionite (2 mg/ml) in 50 mM MOPS buffer. Sodium chlorate (5 ml, 1 M) was poured over the top of the gel, with the enzyme location indicated by a clear band following oxidation of methyl viologen. In tests with proteins from strain KJ, the gel was rinsed twice with 50 ml of buffer, and repeated using sodium perchlorate (5 ml, 0.1 M) to confirm that the locations were the same for perchlorate and chlorate. The center of the clear band in both cases was extracted from the gel and dialyzed in 5 ml of 1· TAE buffer (pH 9.1 for PDA and pH 7.2 for KJ) using a high-retention cellulose membrane (Sigma). The membrane was placed across the width of the electrophoresis chamber, and protein electroeluted from the agarose gel into the buffer in the dialysis membrane at a constant potential of 5 V/cm for 1 h. The buffer was removed from the dialysis membrane and the extracted protein was concentrated using an ultrafiltration membrane (Nanosep 30 K, Pall Corporation). Specific activity was determined at each step in the purification process. Protein fractions were further analyzed using SDS– PAGE analysis in a NuPage 4–12% Bis-Tris gel (Novex XCell Mini-Cell vertical gel rig, Invitrogen Life Technologies) at 15 V/cm for 2 h along with wide-range molecular weight markers (Sigma). Proteins were transferred to a PVDF membrane using a Western blot 155 apparatus (XCell II Blot Module, Invitrogen Life Technologies). Proteins were stained by immersing the membrane in 100% methanol for a few seconds, rinsing with deionized water for 5 min (with shaking), immersion for 30 s in Coomassie Blue (0.1% in 40% methanol with 1% acetic acid), and rinsing 4 to 5 times in 50% methanol. The membrane was washed several times with deionized water over the course of 12 h to remove any remaining SDS. The stained proteins were cut from the PVDF membrane and sequenced by the Macromolecular Core Facility at the Penn State College of Medicine. 2.4. Effect of oxygen on enzyme activity The effect of oxygen on enzyme activity was examined using 100 ll periplasmic fractions (collected in 1.5 ml microcentrifuge tubes, on ice) that had been passed through an ultrafiltration membrane (Nanosep 30K) in an anaerobic chamber. Samples were exposed to air in a refrigerator (on ice), and activity periodically tested (in duplicate) using the reduced methyl viologen assay after first reducing the oxygen in the sample with dithiothreitol (100 ll, 30 mM) in MOPS buffer. Enzyme stability during the experiment was verified using an anoxic control kept in the anaerobic chamber. The time needed to saturate the samples with dissolved oxygen was 40 min (FOXY fiber optic probe, Ocean Optics). 3. Results 3.1. Isolation and analysis of the enzyme from strain KJ Perchlorate and chlorate reductase activity was identified for strain KJ to be greatest in the periplasm fraction, based on analysis of enzyme activities in whole cell lysate and three different cell fractions (Table 1). Malate dehydrogenase assays showed that spheroplasts from KJ grown on chlorate or perchlorate were 86% and 91% intact, respectively. Enzyme activity was larger in the periplasm fraction than in the cytoplasm fraction for chlorate and perchlorate, independent of whether cells were originally grown on chlorate or perchlorate. Based on these results, the periplasm fraction was selected for further analysis. The analysis of enzyme activity from the proteins prepared by precipitation using the periplasm fraction showed that perchlorate reductases from strain KJ could be isolated in the 40% to 55% saturated ammonium sulfate fraction. This protein fraction was selected for further purification using native gel electrophoresis. At a pH of 9.1 the perchlorate reductase of strain KJ was observed to migrate towards the cathode. The separation was therefore performed in reverse, and at a pH of 7.2 perchlorate reductase activity was found to be localized 156 L.M. Steinberg et al. / FEMS Microbiology Letters 247 (2005) 153–159 Table 1 Activity with chlorate and perchlorate in fractions obtained from strain KJ grown with chlorate, KJ grown with perchlorate, and PDA grown with chlorate Substrate for activity assay Cell fraction Activitya(Units/mg protein) KJ grown with ClO 3 KJ grown with ClO 4 PDA grown with ClO 3 ClO 3 ClO 3 ClO 3 ClO 3 Membrane Cytoplasm Periplasm Whole cell lysate 0.11 ± 0.04 0.47 ± 0.19 0.60 ± 0.13 0.38 ± 0.10 0.07 ± 0.02 0.46 ± 0.19 0.80 ± 0.44 0.45 ± 0.23 5.86 ± 0.02 18.96 ± 1.36 40.48 ± 2.59 43.31 ± 1.44 ClO 4 ClO 4 ClO 4 ClO 4 Membrane Cytoplasm Periplasm Whole cell lysate 0.02 ± 0.02 0.01 ± 0.01 0.72 ± 0.01 0.31 ± 0.01 0.00 ± 0.02 0.00 ± 0.01 0.06 ± 0.01 0.000 ± 0.00 0.15 ± 0.11 0.30 ± 0.16 0.60 ± 0.05 0.51 ± 0.00 a One Unit equals the oxidation of 1 mmol of methyl viologen per minute. SDS–PAGE analysis of proteins obtained from the gel indicated the presence of two bands at 100 and 40 kDa (Fig. 2(a)). Sequencing of the first 15 amino acids of the N-terminus of the 100 kDa band (SATDISGAFEYSGGE) indicated a 77% similarity to the alpha subunit of a perchlorate reductase obtained from Dechloromonas agitata strain CKB [21]. 3.2. Isolation and analysis of the enzyme from strain PDA Fig. 1. The purification of reductase enzymes from strains KJ and PDA with native gel electrophoresis: (a) the chlorate reductase of strain PDA, (b) the perchlorate reductase of strain KJ. The entire gel width of the gel was utilized, but only a strip of the gel is shown. Chlorate reductase activity in strain PDA was primarily associated with the periplasm fraction (Table 1), consistent with results found with strain KJ. Malate dehydrogenase assays showed that spheroplasts prepared using PDA were 67% intact. As expected, there was little enzyme activity relative to chlorate with perchlorate using these different protein fractions from Table 2 Specific activity (U/mg protein) of enzymes from strains KJ and PDA with chlorate or perchlorate at each step of the enzyme purification Whole cells Periplasm Ammonium sulfate precipitation Gel-purified Strain KJ, ClO 3 Strain KJ, ClO 4 Strain PDA, ClO 3 1.0 ± 0.1 2.4 ± 0.5 3.8 ± 0.7 0.57 ± 0.03 0.86 ± 0.13 1.0 ± 0.2 27 ± 3 36 ± 1 48 ± 1 0 6.0 ± 0.1 0.13 ± 0.12 in a band that migrated 5 cm from the well towards the cathode (Fig. 1(a)). Clear bands formed within 10 min after adding chlorate or perchlorate to the gel. Unfortunately, gel electrophoretic separation reduced enzyme activity. As shown in Table 2, enzyme activity normalized to the protein concentration increased in the periplasm and ammonium sulfate-precipitated fractions relative to the whole cell fraction. Enzyme activity was reduced by an order of magnitude, however, following preparation of this fraction using gel electrophoresis. Fig. 2. Western blot to PVDF membrane of an SDS–PAGE gel of the isolated reductase enzymes from KJ and PDA: (a) the perchlorate reductase of strain KJ showing the presence of two subunits, (b) and the chlorate reductase of strain PDA showing the presence of three subunits. The entire gel width of the gel was utilized, but only a strip of the gel is shown. L.M. Steinberg et al. / FEMS Microbiology Letters 247 (2005) 153–159 strain PDA, consistent with previous reports that strain PDA is unable to respire using perchlorate [7]. The characteristics of the chlorate reductase obtained from strain PDA were substantially different from those from strain KJ. Chlorate reductase activity of strain PDA was found to be associated with the precipitate from the 55–67% saturated ammonium sulfate fraction. When the protein fraction from strain PDA was purified by gel electrophoresis, the reductase was isolated at a pH of 9.1, with the protein band appearing 12 cm from the well towards the anode (Fig. 1(b)). A clear band indicating the presence of chlorate reductase appeared within 2 min after adding sodium chlorate to the gel. However, overall activity of the chlorate reductase was reduced by an order of magnitude after electrophoresis, a reduction similar to that found with proteins from strain KJ (Table 2). SDS–PAGE analysis of the chlorate reductase from strain PDA indicated three bands with molecular weights of 60, 48, and 27 kDa (Fig. 2(b)). The first 15 amino acids of the N-terminus of the 60 kDa band (SATDISGAFEYSGGE) did not show similarity to any other previously isolated chlorate or perchlorate reductase [10–13]. The closest match was a 73% similarity to the chaperonin GroEL proteins from Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Azotobacter vinelandii. These proteins serve as molecular chaperones for proteins expressed under conditions of environmental stress, including heat and osmotic stress, and the use of nonoptimal growth components. While it is possible that a protein other than the chlorate reductase was identified by sequencing, the similarity in the purification steps using strains KJ and PDA suggests that the three bands obtained here are indicative of a substantially different chlorate reductase than has been previously identified. Further work is needed to confirm these findings. 3.3. Enzyme activity as a function of pH Chlorate reductase activity using the periplasm fraction from strain PDA showed a maximum at a pH of 8.5 (Fig. 3). Enzyme activities using the periplasm fraction from strain KJ showed no apparent peak in activity as a function of pH with either chlorate or perchlorate. 3.4. Effect of oxygen on enzyme activity Chlorate reductase activity of the periplasmic fraction from strain KJ was reduced by 50% after 76 h, while perchlorate reductase activity was reduced by 70% after 76 h (data not shown). Chlorate reductase activity with the periplasmic fraction from strain PDA was still 50% of the original rate even after 15 days. No change in activity was seen in any of the anoxic controls kept on ice in the anaerobic glove box, suggesting the decline in activity was due to exposure to oxygen. 157 100 10 1 0.1 0.01 6.0 KJ grown with ClO3KJ grown with ClO4PDA grown with ClO37.0 8.0 9.0 10.0 Fig. 3. (Per)chlorate reductase activity at various pH values of the periplasmic fraction of cells of strain KJ grown with chlorate or perchlorate, and the periplasmic fraction of cells strain PDA grown with chlorate. 4. Discussion Chlorate and perchlorate reductase activity was localized within the periplasmic fractions for strains KJ and PDA, indicating these enzymes are soluble and not membrane-bound. The location of these enzymes appears consistent with several other (per)chlorate respiring strains. Perchlorate and chlorate reductase enzymes isolated from strains GR-1 [10], perc1ace [11,26], and from I. dechloratans [12] were also found to be soluble and located in the periplasm. In contrast, nitrate reductase A, which possesses chlorate reductase activity, and chlorate reductase C from Proteus mirabilis are bound to the cytoplasmic membrane [22]. Chlorate reductase from P. chloritidismutans is localized in the cytoplasm of the cell [13]. The perchlorate reductase from strain KJ shows similarity with previously isolated perchlorate reductase enzymes. The two subunits of the perchlorate reductase with molecular weights of 100 and 40 kDa are similar in size to those of a perchlorate reductase from strain GR-1, which possessed subunits 95 and 40 kDa in size [10]. The perchlorate reductase of strain KJ had a basic isoelectric point (pH > 9.1) and demonstrated greater activity with chlorate than perchlorate, consistent with findings for the perchlorate reductase from strain GR1. Sequencing of the 100 kDa protein revealed a 77% similarity to an internal sequence of the perchlorate reductase from D. agitata strain CKB [21]. The main limitation of our isolation procedure was a loss of enzyme activity following separation by electrophoresis. Perchlorate reductase activity of the protein fraction markedly declined following electrophoretic separation in the native gel, likely due to inactivation of the 158 L.M. Steinberg et al. / FEMS Microbiology Letters 247 (2005) 153–159 enzyme. As a result, the final purified protein fraction had a much lower level of specific activity than the perchlorate reductase of strain GR-1 [10] or the perchlorate reductase of perc1ace [11]. The chlorate reductase from strain PDA had properties different from enzymes previously identified from chlorate or perchlorate respiring bacteria. The optimum pH for chlorate reductase activity in periplasmic extracts (pH 8.5) was higher than that reported for chlorate reductase from P. chloritidismutans (7.5) [13] or perchlorate reductase from perc1ace (7.5–8.0) [11]. Chlorate reductase activity was higher than activity reported for GR-1 [10] or perc1ace [11], although it was less than reported for P. chloritidismutans [13]. Sequencing data for the 60 kDa band from strain PDA showed no resemblance to other reductases or to dehydrogenases; the closest similarity (73%) was to chaperonin GroEL proteins from Pseudomonas and Azotobacter. This finding is unusual in that all sequenced perchlorate and chlorate reductase enzymes to date have shown similarity to other reductases, dehydrogenases, and heme proteins [10–13]. This lack of a similarity to other data could be due to a GroEL motif at the N-terminus, so further analysis of this 60 kDa protein (and the other two subunits) is needed. However, the combined characteristics in terms of optimum pH, isoelectric point, and activity in the presence of dissolved oxygen all support the unique nature of this enzyme compared to characteristics reported for previously isolated chlorate reductases. Strain PDA is the only known chlorate reducer that expresses chlorate reductase and chlorite dismutase under aerobic conditions [7]. It was observed here that chlorate reductase activity was only reduced by about 50% even after 15 days. In contrast, extracts from strain KJ lost 50% of the chlorate reductase activity and 70% of the perchlorate reductase after only 3 days. Kengen et al. [10] suggested a half-life of a perchlorate reductase from strain GR-1 of 2 to 3 days. Wolterink et al. [13] stated only that cell extracts of the chlorate-reducing strain P. chloritidismutans lost chlorate reductase activity when stored under air, but they also did not provide supporting data. Song and Logan [23] found using whole cells that perchlorate reduction by strain KJ was lost after 12 h although the cells used in tests were still viable. The stability of chlorate reductase activity in strain PDA under aerobic conditions, combined with a known constitutive activity of this enzyme in cells grown aerobically, support the unique nature of chlorate reduction by strain PDA. The purification method used here to isolate perchlorate and chlorate reductases has not been previously reported for (per)chlorate respiring bacteria. However, a similar methyl viologen-based assay was used by others to locate nitrate reductase enzymes in a native gel, but the enzymes were not subsequently extracted from the gel [24,25]. While our method may provide insight into the unique nature of the respiratory enzymes used by strain PDA, the loss of activity after the electrophoresis limits confirmation of the protein compared to other separation techniques. Thus, while our findings regarding the sequences obtained from the 60 kDa protein should be considered preliminary, these and other findings provide a basis for undertaking additional studies to examine the unique nature of oxygen-tolerant chlorate reductase enzymes. Acknowledgement This research was supported by National Science Foundation Grant BES-0001900. References [1] Gullick, R.W., Lechevallier, M.W. and Barhorst, T.S. (2001) Occurrence of perchlorate in drinking water sources. J. Am. Waterworks Assoc. 93, 66–77. [2] Coates, J.D., Michaelidou, U., Bruce, R.A., OÕConnor, S.M., Crespi, J.N. and Achenbach, L.A. (1999) The ubiquity and diversity of dissimilatory (per)chlorate-reducing bacteria. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 65, 5234–5241. [3] Coates, J.D., Michaelidou, U., OÕConnor, S.M., Bruce, R.A. and Achenbach, L.A. (2000) The diverse microbiology of (per)chlorate reduction In: Perchlorate in the Environment (Urbansky, E.T., Ed.), pp. 257–270. Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers, New York. [4] Logan, B.E. (1998) A review of chlorate- and perchloraterespiring microorganisms. Bioremed. J. 2, 69–79. [5] Achenbach, L.A., Michaelidou, U., Bruce, R.A., Fryman, J. and Coates, J.D. (2001) Dechloromonas agitata gen. nov., sp. nov. and Dechlorosoma suillum gen. nov., sp. nov., two novel environmentally dominant (per)chlorate-reducing bacteria and their phylogenetic position. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 51, 527–533. [6] Coates, J.D. and Achenbach, L.A. (2004) Microbial perchlorate reduction: rocket-fuelled metabolism. Nature 2, 569–580. [7] Xu, J., Trimble, J.J., Steinberg, L. and Logan, B.E. (2004) Chlorate and nitrate reduction pathways are separately induced in the perchlorate-respiring bacterium Dechlorosoma sp. KJ and the chlorate-respiring bacterium Pseudomonas sp. PDA. Water Res. 38, 673–680. [8] Urbansky, E.T. (1998) Perchlorate chemistry: implications for analysis and remediation. Bioremed. J. 2, 81–95. [9] van Ginkel, C.G., Rikken, G.B., Kroon, A.G.M. and Kengen, S.W.M. (1996) Purification and characterization of chlorite dismutase: a novel oxygen-generating enzyme. Arch. Microbiol. 166, 321–326. [10] Kengen, S.W., Rikken, G.B., Hagen, W.R., van Ginkel, C.G. and Stams, A.J. (1999) Purification and characterization of (per)chlorate reductase from the chlorate-respiring strain GR-1. J. Bacteriol. 181, 6706–6711. [11] Okeke, B.C. and Frankenberger Jr., W.T. (2003) Molecular analysis of a perchlorate reductase from a perchlorate-respiring bacterium per1ace. Microbiol. Res. 158, 337–344. [12] Thorell, H.D., Stenklo, K., Karlsson, J. and Nilsson, T. (2003) A gene cluster for chlorate metabolism in Ideonella dechloratans. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 69, 5585–5592. [13] Wolterink, A.F., Schiltz, E., Haagedoorn, P.L., Hagen, W.R., Kengen, S.W. and Stams, A.J. (2003) Characterization of the L.M. Steinberg et al. / FEMS Microbiology Letters 247 (2005) 153–159 [14] [15] [16] [17] [18] [19] chlorate reductase from Pseudomonas chloritidismutans. J. Bacteriol. 185, 3210–3213. Bender, K.S., OÕConnor, S.M., Chakraborty, R., Coates, J.D. and Achenbach, L.A. (2002) Sequencing and transcriptional analysis of the chlorite dismutase gene of Dechloromonas agitata and its use as a metabolic probe. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 68, 4820– 4826. OÕConnor, S.M. and Coates, J.D. (2002) Universal immunoprobe for (per)chlorate-reducing bacteria. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 68, 3108–3113. Logan, B.E. and Kim, K. (1998) Microbiological treatment of perchlorate contaminated ground waterProceedings of the National Ground Water Association Southwest Focused Ground Water Conference: Discussing the Issue of MTBE and Perchlorate in the Ground Water, pp. 87–91. National Ground Water Association, Columbus, OH, USA. Logan, B.E., Zhang, H., Mulvaney, P., Milner, M.G., Head, I.M. and Unz, R.F. (2001) Kinetics of perchlorate and chlorate respiring bacteria. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 67, 2499–2506. Min, B., Evans, P.J., Chu, A.K. and Logan, B.E. (2004) Perchlorate removal in sand and plastic media bioreactors. Water Res. 38, 47–60. Worthington Biochemical Corporation, Lakewood, NJ. Enzymes and biochemicals; malate dehydrogenase. (WWW document) http://www.worthington-biochem.com/MDH/default.html. 159 [20] Jones, R.W. and Garland, P.B. (1977) Sites and specificity of the reaction of bipyridylium compounds with anaerobic respiratory enzymes of Escherichia coli. Biochem. J. 164, 199–211. [21] Bender, K.S., Chakraborty, R., Belchik, S.M., Coates, J.D. and Achenbach, L.A. (2003) Sequencing and transcriptional analysis of the perchlorate reductase gene from Dechloromonas agitata. Submitted to the GenBank database under accession number AAO49008. [22] Oltmann, L.F., Reifnders, W.N. and Stouthamer, A.H. (1976) The correlation between the protein composition of cytoplasmic membranes and the formation of nitrate reductase A, chlorate reductase C and tetrathionate reductase in Proteus mirabilis wild type and some chlorate resistant mutants. Arch. Microbiol. 111, 25–35. [23] Song, Y. and Logan, B.E. (2004) Effect of O2 exposure on perchlorate reduction by Dechlorosoma sp. KJ. Water Res. 38, 1626–1632. [24] Antipov, A.N., Sorokin, D.Y., LÕVov, N.P. and Kuenen, J.G. (2003) New enzyme belonging to the family of molybdenum-free nitrate reductases. Biochem. J. 369, 185–189. [25] Bedzyk, L., Wang, T. and Ye, R.W. (1999) The periplasmic nitrate reductase in Pseudomonas sp. strain G-179 catalyzes the first step of denitrification. J. Bacteriol. 181, 2802–2806. [26] Giblin, T. and Frankenberger Jr., W.T. (2001) Perchlorate and nitrate reductase activity in the perchlorate-respiring bacterium perc1ace. Microbiol. Res. 156, 311–315.