Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Organ-on-a-chip wikipedia , lookup
Cell culture wikipedia , lookup
Cellular differentiation wikipedia , lookup
Tissue engineering wikipedia , lookup
Signal transduction wikipedia , lookup
Cell encapsulation wikipedia , lookup
List of types of proteins wikipedia , lookup
Proteolysis wikipedia , lookup
Phosphorylation wikipedia , lookup
Biochem. J. (2008) 412, 579–588 (Printed in Great Britain) 579 doi:10.1042/BJ20080324 Phosphorylation of eIF2α in response to 26S proteasome inhibition is mediated by the haem-regulated inhibitor (HRI) kinase Azmi YERLIKAYA*, Scot R. KIMBALL† and Bruce A. STANLEY‡1 *Department of Biology, Faculty of Science and Arts, University of Dumlupinar, Kutahya, Turkey, †Department of Cellular and Molecular Physiology, The Pennsylvania State University College of Medicine, Hershey, PA 17033, U.S.A., and ‡The Pennsylvania State University College of Medicine, Section of Research Resources, Hershey, PA 17033, U.S.A. The present study demonstrates that even brief inhibition of degradation by the 26S proteasome inhibits global protein synthesis, mediated through increased phosphorylation of eIF2α (eukaryotic translational initiation factor 2α) by the HRI (haemregulated inhibitor) kinase. Exposure of COS-7 cells to the proteasome inhibitor MG-132 (the proteasome inhibitor carbobenzoxy-L-leucyl-L-leucyl-leucinal) for 4 h resulted in a 55– 60 % decrease in protein synthesis rate compared with control cells. This repression of protein synthesis after treatment with MG-132 is not due to induction of apoptosis, which is known to occur after longer periods of 26S inhibition. Instead, we observed a significantly increased phosphorylation of eIF2α, which is known to repress global protein synthesis. In three MEF (mouse embryonic fibroblast) knockout cell lines lacking one of the four kinases known to phosphorylate eIF2α, increased phosphorylation of eIF2α still occurred after inhibition of the 26S proteasome. These three cell lines included a deletion of the PKR (double-stranded-RNA-dependent protein kinase); a deletion of the PERK (PKR-like endoplasmic reticulum resident kinase); or a deletion of the GCN2 (positive general control of transcription-2) kinase, indicating that none of these kinases was primarily responsible for the observed phosphorylation of eIF2α. In contrast, in a fourth MEF knockout cell line, HRI−/− cells lacking the HRI kinase failed to increase eIF2α phosphorylation upon proteasome inhibitor treatment (MG-132 or various doses of Bortezomib), indicating that the HRI kinase is the primary kinase activated by brief treatment of MEFs with 26S proteasome inhibitors. INTRODUCTION [5,6]. Since intracellular levels of eIF2B are approx. 10–20 % that of eIF2 in the cytoplasm, phosphorylation of as little as 10 % of eIF2 can be sufficient to sequester virtually all the available eIF2B, thereby blocking the eIF2B exchange activity and therefore inhibiting protein synthesis completely [4,6]. eIF2α is known to be specifically phosphorylated at Ser51 by at least four different kinases including the interferon-inducible doublestranded RNA-activated PKR (double-stranded-RNA-dependent protein kinase; in response to viral infection and stress conditions), the HRI (haem-regulated inhibitor) kinase, the nutrient-regulated protein kinase GCN2 (positive general control of transcription-2; in response to uncharged tRNA in nutrient-deprived cells) and PERK [PKR-like ER (endoplasmic reticulum)-resident kinase; in response to accumulation of unfolded protein in the ER] [4,5,7]. The 26S proteasome is an ATP-dependent proteolytic system that is engaged in the selective degradation of short-lived proteins under normal metabolic conditions, bulk degradation of long-lived proteins, partial digestion/processing of some proteins [e.g. NFκB (nuclear factor κB)] and antigen presentation. CDK (cyclindependent kinase) inhibitors, M-, S- and G1 -phase-specific cyclins, p53, ODC (ornithine decarboxylase) and the transcription factors c-Jun and c-Fos are a few examples of the multitude of proteins degraded by the 26S proteasome [8]. Previously, several contradictory studies on the effect of the 26S proteasome inhibition on protein synthesis rate have been published. For instance, Schubert et al. [9] indicated that treating HeLa cells The dominant mechanism of control of global protein synthesis is phosphorylation/dephosphorylation of translational components, although other mechanisms, such as cleavage of initiation factors, can also affect protein synthesis rates, for example during apoptosis or after viral infection. Phosphorylation of eIF2 (eukaryotic translational initiation factor 2) appears to be a general mechanism for inhibiting the initiation of protein synthesis [1]. eIF2 is composed of three subunits termed α, β and γ in the order of increasing molecular mass. The primary role of eIF2 in translational initiation is to transfer methionyl-tRNA [Met-tRNAi (initiator methionine tRNA)] to the 40S ribosomal subunits [2]. First, eIF2 forms a ternary complex with Met-tRNAi and GTP; this ternary complex then binds to the 40S ribosomal subunit to generate the 43S pre-initiation complex [3]. Upon joining of the 60S ribosomal subunit to the 43S pre-initiation complex, the GTP moiety is hydrolysed and an eIF2–GDP complex is released from the ribosome [4]. In order to promote another round of initiation, the GDP bound to eIF2 must be exchanged for GTP, a reaction carried out by GEF (guanine-nucleotide-exchange factor) eIF2B [2]. The global rate of protein synthesis is mainly regulated by the specific phosphorylation of Ser51 of the eIF2α subunit [5]. eIF2α(P) (phosphorylated eIF2α) cannot undergo GDP/GTP exchange and forms a non-dissociable eIF2α(P)–eIF2B complex Key words: apoptosis, eukaryotic translational initiation factor 2α (eIF2α), protein degradation, protein kinase, protein synthesis, 26S proteasome. Abbreviations used: AdoMet, S -adenosylmethionine; BCS, biodegradable counting solution; CDK, cyclin-dependent kinase; CHX, cycloheximide; DMEM, Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium; ECF, enhanced chemifluorescence; eIF2, eukaryotic translational initiation factor 2; eIF2α(P), phosphorylated eIF2α; ER, endoplasmic reticulum; FCS, fetal calf serum; GCN2, positive general control of transcription-2; HRI, haem-regulated inhibitor; Hsp, heatshock protein; MEF, mouse embryonic fibroblast; PKR, double-stranded-RNA-dependent protein kinase; PERK, PKR-like ER-resident kinase; PITC, phenylisothiocyanate; TBS-T, Tris-buffered saline with Tween 20; TCA, trichloroacetic acid; UPR, unfolded protein response; Z-Val-Ala-DL-Asp-CH2 F, benzyloxycarbonyl-valylalanyl-DL-aspartylfluoromethane. 1 To whom correspondence should be addressed (email [email protected]). c The Authors Journal compilation c 2008 Biochemical Society 580 A. Yerlikaya, S. R. Kimball and B. A. Stanley with a cocktail of proteasome inhibitors (zLLL/lactacystin) for 2 or 4 h profoundly decreased protein synthesis [9]. Similarly, Mimnaugh et al. [10] have also shown that the proteasome inhibitor, lactacystin, decreased the synthesis of most cellular proteins, while it specifically induced the synthesis of stress proteins Hsp72 (heat-shock protein 72) and Hsp90 in human SKBr3 breast tumour cells [10]. Jiang and Wek [11] later indicated that the reduced levels of translation in response to proteasome inhibition were caused by increased phosphorylation of eIF2α, which was mediated through the activation of GCN2 [11]. In contrast, Bush et al. [12] reported that MG-132 (the proteasome inhibitor carbobenzoxy-L-leucyl-L-leucyl-leucinal) did not affect total protein synthesis even after an 18 h treatment of canine kidney cells. During our recent studies on the mechanism of degradation of S-adenosylmethionine decarboxylase (a short-lived, polyamine biosynthetic enzyme), we found that inhibition of the 26S proteasome causes a significant increase (>2-fold) in the cellular level of the enzyme’s substrate, AdoMet (S-adenosylmethionine) [13]. The present studies trace this increase in AdoMet levels to an increase in the level of its precursor, methionine. Methionine levels in turn were increased due to a general increase in amino acid levels resulting from decreased protein synthesis and therefore decreased utilization of amino acids. We therefore decided to investigate the molecular mechanisms responsible for the decreased protein synthesis rate after inhibition of the 26S proteasome. Although decreased protein synthesis rates occur during apoptosis, and inhibition of 26S proteasome has been reported to induce apoptosis in several different experimental systems [14–17], our results indicate that loss of protein synthesis activity after short periods of inhibition of the 26S proteasome is not accompanied by any signs of induction of apoptosis. Instead, we show that inhibition of the 26S proteasome significantly increases eIF2α phosphorylation, which is thus the primary cause of loss of protein synthesis activity, in agreement with other published work. By testing four knockout cell lines with individual deletions for each of the four kinases known to phosphorylate eIF2α, we also demonstrate for the first time that HRI is the primary kinase responsible for the increased eIF2α phosphorylation caused by the proteasome inhibitor in MEFs (mouse embryonic fibroblasts). EXPERIMENTAL Materials ECF (enhanced chemifluorescence) detection reagent for Western blotting was purchased from Amersham (now GE, Arlington Heights, IL, U.S.A.). COS-7 cells were obtained from the A.T.C.C. (Manassas, VA, U.S.A.). Wild-type (PERK+/+ ) and PERK-knockout cells were kindly provided by Dr David Ron (New York University School of Medicine). Wild-type (PKR+/+ ) and PKR−/− MEF cells were a gift from Dr Charles Weissmann (University of Zurich). Wild-type (GCN2+/+ ) and GCN2−/− MEF cells were a gift from Dr Douglas Cavener (The Pennsylvania State University). Bortezomib (also known as PS-341 or Velcade) was a gift from Dr Vincent Chau (The Pennsylvania State University College of Medicine). MG-132 and caspase inhibitor I [Z-Val-Ala-DL-Asp-CH2 F (benzyloxycarbonyl-valylalanyl-DL-aspartylfluoromethane); ‘ZVAD-FMK’] were purchased from Calbiochem (San Diego, CA, U.S.A.). DMEM (Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium) was from Gibco BRL (Gaithersburg, MD, U.S.A.). FCS (fetal calf serum) was from HyClone (Logan, UT, U.S.A.). PVDF membranes were obtained from Osmonics (Westborough, MA, c The Authors Journal compilation c 2008 Biochemical Society U.S.A.). Anti-caspase 3 and anti-caspase 8 antibodies were kindly provided by Dr Shao-Cong Sun (Penn State University College of Medicine, currently at the M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, U.S.A.). Alkaline phosphatase-conjugated goat anti-mouse IgG was from Bio-Rad (Hercules, CA, U.S.A.), and [methyl-3 H]methionine (84 Ci/mmol), [5-3 H]proline (15– 40 Ci/mmol) and BCS (biodegradable counting solution) were from Amersham (now GE). PITC (phenylisothiocyanate) was from Pierce (Rockford, IL, U.S.A.). CHX (cycloheximide), TCA (trichloroacetic acid) and the protein standard (BSA) were from Sigma (St. Louis, MO, U.S.A.). All other chemicals were obtained from Fisher (Pittsburgh, PA, U.S.A.). Cell culture maintenance COS-7, wild-type PERK+/+ and PERK−/− knockout cells were maintained in DMEM (plus 4.5 g/l glucose) supplemented with 10 % (v/v) FCS, 2 mM glutamine, 100 μg/ml streptomycin and 100 units/ml penicillin in a humidified atmosphere at 37 ◦C with 5 % CO2 . Wild-type (PKR+/+ ) and PKR−/− cells were maintained in DMEM with 10 % FBS, 0.1 mM 2-mercaptoethanol, 1 mM sodium pyruvate, 100 μg/ml streptomycin and 100 units/ml penicillin in a humidified atmosphere at 37 ◦C with 5 % CO2 . Stock cultures were maintained in 75 cm2 Corning flasks, and experimental cultures were grown in 10 or 6 cm2 Falcon plates. The cells were subcultured when they were 70–80 % confluent. Western blotting The ECF detection system was utilized for Western blotting according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Proteins were electrophoretically separated on 12.5 % (w/v) polyacrylamide gels under denaturing conditions in 0.1 % SDS [18]. The proteins were then transferred on to a PVDF membrane at 45 V for 50 min at room temperature (20 ◦C) or overnight at 30 V and 4 ◦C in the transfer buffer [25 mM Tris, 192 mM glycine and 20 % (v/v) methanol]. When proteins were transferred overnight, the next morning the voltage was raised to 90 V for an additional hour to complete the transfer. Membranes were incubated with a rabbit polyclonal antibody (1:4000 dilution) that specifically recognizes eIF2α which is phosphorylated at Ser51 , followed by alkaline phosphatase-conjugated anti-rabbit secondary antibody (1:4000 dilution) in TBS-T (Tris-buffered saline with Tween 20). The relative amount of total eIF2α in each sample was determined by probing the membranes with a monoclonal antibody (1:500 dilution) that recognizes both the phosphorylated and unphosphorylated forms of eIF2α, followed by alkaline phosphatase-conjugated anti-mouse secondary antibody (1:4000 dilution). eIF4G was detected with a rabbit polyclonal antibody (1:3000 dilution). Proenzymes and the cleaved products indicating activation of caspase 3 or caspase 8 were detected with rabbit polyclonal antibodies used at 1:2000 or 1:800 dilution respectively. In each case, the membranes were then extensively washed with TBS-T and developed with ECF substrate for 3– 5 min. The fluorescence developed was scanned with a Molecular Dynamics FluorImager using a 570 nm filter, and bands were quantified using ImageQuant software (Molecular Dynamics). Determination of protein synthesis rate and amino acid uptake Cells were seeded in 10 cm2 dishes and treated with MG-132 for 4 h (at approx. 80 % confluence). After 4 h of treatment, cells were incubated with 0.4 μCi/ml [5-3 H]proline (15–40 Ci/mmol) or with 0.4 μCi/ml [methyl-3 H]methionine (84 Ci/mmol) for 20 min. The medium was then removed and cells were washed twice with PBS. Cells were lysed and unincorporated radioactive amino acids were Phosphorylation of eIF2α by HRI kinase after 26S proteasome inhibition removed by washing cells once for 10 min and twice for 5 min each with 10 % (w/v) TCA on ice. After washing once with methanol, cells lysates were neutralized with 1 ml of 0.3 M NaOH and 1 % SDS for 30 min at room temperature. The lysate (800 μl) was added to 10 ml of BCS and counted. To measure amino acids uptake, cells were similarly labelled with 0.4 μCi/ml [3 H]proline or 1 μCi/ml [3 H]methionine. After labelling, cells were washed twice with PBS to remove extracellular (unabsorbed) amino acids, and then lysed in 1 ml of 0.3 M NaOH and 1 % SDS for 30 min at room temperature. The intracellular radioactivity released into the lysate (800 μl) was counted in 10 ml of BCS [19]. Analysis of apoptotic cells by flow cytometry Apoptosis was analysed based on the translocation of phosphatidylserine from the inner side of the plasma membrane to the outer layer during the early stages of apoptosis [20]. Equal numbers of cells were seeded in 10 cm2 dishes, and grown until they were 70 % confluent. Then cells were treated with MG132 (50 μM) or DMSO (0.1 %) for 4 h. After treatment, cells were washed gently with 10 ml of PBS twice, and incubated with trypsin for 3 min. After removal of trypsin, cells were incubated at 37 ◦C just until they appeared to be detached. Cells were then washed with PBS and centrifuged at 200 g for 5 min. Cells were resuspended in 100 μl of annexin V binding buffer (10 mM Hepes/NaOH, pH 7.4, 5 mM CaCl2 and140 mM NaCl) containing annexin V–FITC (FITC-labelled annexin V) and propidium iodide (50 μg/ml). Cells were incubated in this solution by shaking at room temperature for 15 min. Samples were then diluted in Hepes buffer and subjected immediately to flow-cytometry analysis using a FACS Scan II flow cytometer in the Pennsylvania State University College of Medicine Flow Cytometry Facility. Early-stage apoptotic cells stain with annexin V only, while late-stage apoptotic cells as well as necrotic cells stain with both annexin V and propidium iodide. Amino acid analysis by HPLC Cells were lysed in 0.1 M HCl by three quick freeze/thaw cycles. After centrifugation at 16 000g for 10 min at 4 ◦C, the pellet was resuspended in 0.3 M NaOH for the protein assay. The supernatant containing free amino acids was then dried down by centrifugal evaporation (SpeedVac), resuspended in redry solution [20 % triethylamine and 40 % (v/v) ethanol], and dried down again. Amino acids were then resuspended in derivatization solution (70 % ethanol, 10 % triethylamine and 10 % PITC) for 10 min. After drying again by centrifugal evaporation, the samples were resuspended in sample diluent buffer [95 % 2.6 mM Na2 HPO4 , pH 7.4 (pH was adjusted with 10 % phosphoric acid), and 5 % acetonitrile], and were directly injected for HPLC analysis. The HPLC system consisted of a Waters 600E multisolvent delivery system equipped with a Waters 484 tunable absorbance detector and a 30 cm × 3.9 mm C18 column. Amino acids were detected at 254 nm. The mobile phase A (solution A) consisted of 94 % 140 mM sodium acetate trihydrate, 0.05 % triethylamine (pH was adjusted to pH 6.4 with acetic acid) and 6 % acetonitrile. The mobile phase B (solution B) was 60 % acetonitrile, which was degassed prior to use by sonication (using a Bronson 2200 ultrasonic bath) under vacuum for 20 s. The gradient conditions were initially 100 % solution A for 13.5 min, followed by an immediate change to 3 % solution B and then a linear change to 23 % solution B over 16.5 min; then to 71 % solution A and 29 % solution B over 13 min; then to 34 % solution B over 7 min; maintained isocratically at 34 % solution B for 10 min; then to 100 % solution B over 0.5 min, maintained isocratically 581 Table 1 Effect of 26S proteasome inhibition on amino acid levels in COS-7 cells Cells were treated with MG-132 (50 μM) or DMSO (0.1 %) for 4 h. The results are presented as fold increase (MG-132/control). The values are means + − S.D. (n = 2). Amino acid Fold increase Threonine Tyrosine Valine Methionine Leucine Phenylalanine Lysine 2.07 + − 0.31 2.12 + − 0.20 2.09 + − 0.18 1.70 + − 0.12 2.14 + − 0.14 2.18 + − 0.11 1.82 + − 0.22 at 100 % solution B for 2.5 min; then to 100 % solution A over 2 min; and maintained at 100 % solution A for 3 min. The flow rate was 1 ml/min, but was raised to 1.5 ml/min during the final 3 min washing of the column with 100 % solution A. To calculate methionine concentration, a standard curve was obtained as a function of known concentrations of methionine and the corresponding peak areas by using linear regression with Prism 3.0 software (GraphPad Software, San Diego, CA, U.S.A.). The methionine concentration in each sample was then calculated from the sample attenuance and the standard curve. Protein determination The protein concentration was determined using the Bio-Rad dyebinding assay. BSA was used as a standard [21]. Statistical analysis Statistical analyses were carried out with Prism 3.0 software (GraphPad Software). Student’s two-tailed t test was used to determine whether the observed differences were statistically significant (P < 0.05). RESULTS During our studies of the mechanism of S-adenosylmethionine decarboxylase degradation, we found that a significant increase in AdoMet level (>2-fold) occurred shortly after inhibition of the 26S proteasome [13]. One potential mechanism to account for this observed increase in [AdoMet] could be that inhibition of the 26S proteasome stabilized AdoMet synthase, the enzyme that catalyses the production of AdoMet from methionine and ATP, thereby increasing the amount of AdoMet synthase activity. Using Western-blot analysis, we determined that the amount of one of the AdoMet synthase subunits increased only 30 % after 4 h inhibition of the 26S proteasome, whereas other subunits were not increased at all (results not shown), suggesting that there must be additional mechanisms involved in producing the increase in AdoMet level observed after inhibition of the 26S proteasome. A second potential mechanism for the increase [AdoMet] would be an increase in the availability of the methionine substrate for the AdoMet synthase-catalysed reaction after 26S proteasome inhibition. Analysis of amino acid profiles after 4 h MG-132 (50 μM) treatment of COS-7 cells indicated that inhibition of the 26S proteasome resulted in a 1.7–2.1-fold increase in the level of all detectable amino acids including methionine (Table 1), with methionine concentrations in MG132-treated cells rising to 12.8 pmol/mg of protein as compared with 7.2 pmol/mg of protein in control cells. This strongly c The Authors Journal compilation c 2008 Biochemical Society 582 A. Yerlikaya, S. R. Kimball and B. A. Stanley Figure 1 Effect of the 26S proteasome inhibitor on protein synthesis in COS-7 cells To determine the protein synthesis rate after MG-132 (50 μM) or 0.1 % DMSO treatment for 4 h, cells were labelled by addition of either 0.5 μCi/ml [3 H]proline or 0.4 μCi/ml [3 H]methionine to the complete media for 20 min. Cells were washed extensively with PBS and with 10 % TCA for 10 min to remove unincorporated radioactive precursor. Cells were washed with 10 % TCA twice more for 5 min each. After a final wash with 100 % methanol, cells were lysed in 0.3 M NaOH and 1 % SDS for 30 min at room temperature. Aliquots were counted by liquid-scintillation 3 counting in 10 ml of BCS. Values are means + − S.E.M. (n = 4 in the [ H]proline experiment; n = 3 in the [3 H]methionine experiment). The P values significantly different from that of the control are indicated (Student’s t test). The S.E.M. is small and not seen in the MG-132-treated group in the [3 H]methionine incorporation experiment (plotted on the right Y -axis). suggested that the increase in AdoMet levels observed was probably due to an increase in the availability of methionine as a substrate. This increase in intracellular methionine (or other amino acids) concentration could occur either (i) through an increase in uptake of methionine from the medium; (ii) through down-regulation of protein synthesis (less usage of intracellular amino acids for protein synthesis); or (iii) through an increase in protein degradation activity, thus supplying more methionine through release from degraded proteins. This third possibility was highly unlikely under these experimental conditions, since the major intracellular protein degradation apparatus (the 26S proteasome) was inhibited. Using [3 H]methionine or [3 H]proline in separate experiments, it was determined that inhibition of the 26S proteasome did not affect amino acid uptake (results not shown). Therefore we next decided to investigate possible changes in the rate of protein synthesis after cell exposure to MG132. As seen in Figure 1, the determination of protein synthesis rate by [3 H]proline incorporation into TCA-precipitable proteins indicated that treatment of COS-7 cells with MG-132 (50 μM) for 4 h reduced the rate of protein synthesis by ∼ 55 % as compared with the control cells (treated with 0.1 % DMSO). Likewise, a ∼ 60 % decrease in protein synthesis rate was observed in MG132-treated cells when [3 H]methionine was used as a radiolabel (Figure 1, plotted on the right side of the graph). As noted in the Introduction section, it has previously been shown that apoptosis can be induced by different proteasome inhibitors, at least at longer exposure times than used in the current experiments, probably as a consequence of the accumulation of some crucial proteins that would normally be degraded by the ubiquitin–proteasome pathway [14–16,22,23]. Therefore we decided to investigate whether apoptosis was induced in COS-7 cells after short-term inhibition of the 26S proteasome, thereby possibly accounting for the observed decrease in protein synthesis. First, we investigated whether the apoptosis executioner caspase 3, which is an enzyme activated in almost every apoptotic process [14,16], or caspase 8, another early caspase, were cleaved to their active forms after inhibition of the 26S proteasome. As can been seen in the Western-blot analyses in Figures 2(A) and 2(B), no disappearance of caspase 3 or caspase 8 precursor protein c The Authors Journal compilation c 2008 Biochemical Society Figure 2 Loss of protein synthesis activity after inhibition of the 26S proteasome is not due to activation of caspases (A–B) Analyses of caspase 3 (A) and caspase 8 (B) activation. After treatment of COS-7 cells with MG-132 (50 μM) or 0.1 % DMSO, equal amounts of protein (50 μg) from cell lysates were resolved by electrophoresis on a 12.5 % polyacrylamide gel, followed by transfer to a PVDF membrane at 50 V at room temperature for 45 min. The membranes were probed with a caspase 3 polyclonal antibody (diluted 1:2000) overnight at 4 ◦C. The membrane was then washed extensively with TBS-T and incubated with alkaline phosphatase-conjugated anti-rabbit IgG (diluted 1:4000). The membrane was developed with ECF detection reagent (Amersham) and visualized with a FluorImager. The same membrane was stripped and reprobed with a caspase 8 polyclonal antibody (diluted 1:800), and developed as described above. was detected after addition of the proteasome inhibitor MG-132 to COS-7 cells for up to 4 h. Secondly, the percentage of cells undergoing apoptosis after 4 h treatment of cells with MG-132 was the same as in untreated control cells, as measured by flowcytometry analysis of annexin V and propidium iodide staining (results not shown), again indicating that no apoptosis was induced at early time points after MG-132 addition. Pre-incubation of COS-7 cells with the broad-spectrum caspase inhibitor I (Z-ValAla-DL-Asp-CH2 F; 35 μM) for 1 h before addition of a fresh medium containing MG-132 and caspase inhibitor I also failed Phosphorylation of eIF2α by HRI kinase after 26S proteasome inhibition Figure 3 Effect of the proteasome inhibitor on eIF4G cleavage and phosphorylation of eIF2α in COS-7 cells (A) COS-7 cells were treated with MG-132 (50 μM) for time periods indicated. Equal amounts of protein (50 μg) were separated on an SDS/7.5 % PAGE gel, transferred on to a PVDF membrane and detected with an eIF4G polyclonal antibody as described in the Experimental section. (B) To detect eIF2α(P) and total eIF2α, equal amounts of protein (50 μg) were separated on an SDS/12.5 % PAGE gel, followed by Western-blot analysis as described in the Experimental section. (C) The results were quantified by ImageQuant software, and the results are expressed as the level of eIF2α(P) divided by the total level of eIF2α, with zero time set as 1. Values are means + − S.E.M. (n = 2). The error bars are small and not visible for some data points. to prevent the loss of protein synthesis activity 4 h later (results not shown). This time-dependent experiment also indicated that the loss of protein synthesis activity occurs as early as 2 h after addition of MG-132. Altogether, these results indicate that loss of protein synthesis activity after short-term (2–4 h) inhibition of the 26S proteasome is independent of and precedes any induction of apoptosis. Post-translational processing of some eukaryotic initiation factors, in particular eIF4G and eIF2, is known to regulate the global rate of protein synthesis in response to physiological insults. For example, picarnovirus infections or antitumour agents cisplatin or etoposide induce the cleavage of eIF4G, which also occurs during apoptosis and which completely shuts off protein synthesis [24,25]. Therefore we next examined the stability of eIF4G after treatment of cells with MG-132. The Western blot 583 in Figure 3(A) shows that the intact eIF4G, which runs as a set of three closely spaced bands of approx. 220 kDa, was not cleaved into any visible smaller fragments after 2 h of MG-132 treatment, at which point protein synthesis is already inhibited. Although a faint immunoreactive band of the anticipated size (∼ 70 kDa) was observed in treated cells after 4 h of MG-132 treatment, the amount of intact and presumably functional eIF4G was not significantly affected by MG-132 treatment, eliminating eIF4G cleavage as a viable explanation of the observed 55–60 % decrease in protein synthesis rate. To determine whether 26S proteasome inhibition can cause an increase in eIF2α phosphorylation, COS-7 cells were treated with MG-132 (50 μM) in 0.1 % DMSO, and the relative phosphorylation state of eIF2α was determined by Western-blot analysis. The blots were probed with a polyclonal antibody that only recognizes eIF2α(P) (phosphorylated at Ser51 ). The blots were then stripped and reprobed with a monoclonal antibody that equally recognizes both phosphorylated and unphosphorylated forms of the protein, thus measuring total eIF2α levels. As shown in Figure 3(B) and quantified in Figure 3(C), the relative amount of eIF2α(P) increased by 20 and 67 % after 2 and 4 h respectively of treatment of COS-7 cells with MG-132. In contrast, the relative level of eIF2α phosphorylation was slightly decreased in vehicle-control cells treated with 0.1 % DMSO for the same time period. The decrease in eIF2α phosphorylation coincides with the increased rate of protein synthesis observed in control cells (results not shown), a well-known effect of the addition of fresh serum-containing medium to cells. There are several possible mechanisms that could explain how inhibition of the 26S proteasome may be inducing eIF2α phosphorylation: (i) eIF2α(P) might normally be rapidly degraded by the 26S proteasome, and thus accumulate rapidly to higher levels when the 26S proteasome is inhibited; (ii) inhibition of the 26S proteasome could result in an increase in the activity of an eIF2α kinase; or (iii) there could be a decrease in the activity of an eIF2α phosphatase after inhibition of the 26S proteasome. Initially, we examined whether increasing eIF2α phosphorylation might affect the stability of the protein or not. Our own observations and other reported studies indicated that treatment of cells with okadaic acid (an inhibitor of phosphatases 1 and 2A) results in an increase in eIF2α phosphorylation [26,27]. Therefore COS-7 cells were pretreated for 1 h with 1 μM okadaic acid to increase the amount of eIF2α(P) and then eIF2α stability was determined by CHX chase using Western-blot analysis. Although eIF2α phosphorylation was significantly increased by okadaic acid treatment, the half-life of eIF2α in treated cells was the same as that in the control cells (results not shown). In addition, stoichiometric phosphorylation of purified eIF2α by an in vitro kinase treatment did not change its stability in an in vitro degradation assay (results not shown). These results suggested that eIF2α(P) is not normally subject to rapid degradation by the 26S proteasome, and precludes direct changes in eIF2α(P) stability contributing to its relative increase after 26S proteasome inhibition. Next, we investigated which of the known eIF2α kinases might be mediating the observed phosphorylation of eIF2α after 26S proteasome inhibition, by testing whether knockout cell lines of each of the known eIF2α kinases no longer showed increased phosphorylation of eIF2α after 26S proteasome inhibition. The first kinase tested was PKR, which is a ubiquitously expressed serine/threonine protein kinase that has been implicated in mediating phosphorylation of eIF2α in response to doublestranded RNA, cytokine, growth factor and stress signals [28]. Fibroblasts containing a chromosomal deletion in the PKR gene (PKR-knockout cells) were utilized to determine whether c The Authors Journal compilation c 2008 Biochemical Society 584 Figure 4 A. Yerlikaya, S. R. Kimball and B. A. Stanley Effect of the proteasome inhibitor on eIF2α phosphorylation in wild-type, PKR-knockout and PERK-knockout cells (A) Wild-type and PKR-knockout cells were treated with MG-132 (50 μM) or 0.1 % DMSO for 4 h. Equal amounts of protein (30 μg) were separated on an SDS/12.5 % PAGE gel, followed by Western-blot analysis as described in the Experimental section. (B) The results were quantified by ImageQuant software, and expressed as the amount of eIF2α(P) divided by the total eIF2α level, with the control (DMSO-treated) set as 1. Cells were also treated with MG-132+CHX to determine whether complete inhibition of protein synthesis lowers the increase in eIF2α phosphorylation (right panel). (C) Wild-type and PERK-knockout cells were similarly treated with MG-132 (50 μM) or 0.1 % DMSO for 4 h, and the total eIF2α and eIF2α(P) were determined by Western-blot analysis. Wild-type and PERK-knockout cells were also treated with thapsigargin (1 μM) for 1 h, an agent known to activate PERK. (D) Quantification of the membrane shown in (C, left panel). Each bar in (B, D) is the mean + − S.E.M. for an experiment run in duplicate. The error bars are small and not visible in certain bars. this kinase is responsible for phosphorylation of eIF2α after inhibition of the 26S proteasome. The results presented in Figures 4(A) and 4(B) indicated that treatment with the MG132 proteasome inhibitor for 4 h resulted in a 1.54-fold increase in eIF2α phosphorylation in parental wild-type cells (PKR+/+ ) as compared with a 1.65-fold increase in PKR-knockout cells (PKR−/− ). This indicates that PKR is not the primary kinase involved in the elevation of eIF2α phosphorylation after inhibition of 26S proteasome function, since a significant rise in the amount of eIF2α phosphorylation after MG-132 treatment still occurred in the cells lacking PKR activity. MG-132 also stimulated eIF2α phosphorylation even if the protein synthesis was completely blocked by the CHX treatment in these MEF cells, suggesting that de novo protein synthesis is not required for the effect of the proteasome inhibitor on eIF2α phosphorylation (Figure 4A, right panel). As stated in the Introduction section, in addition to its role in the degradation of essentially all short-lived proteins and the great bulk of long-lived proteins, the 26S proteasome also degrades proteins that are denatured or improperly folded [29]. In addition to leading to rapid degradation, the accumulation of unfolded proteins (e.g. in response to ER stresses) results in increased transcription of the genes for ER-resident chaperones (which c The Authors Journal compilation c 2008 Biochemical Society would increase the protein-folding activity) and repression of protein synthesis through the increased phosphorylation of eIF2α. This response to ER stresses is known as the UPR (unfolded protein response) [30]. Previously, PERK has been shown to be activated in response to accumulation of misfolded proteins in the ER, and to phosphorylate eIF2α, implicating PERK in UPRmediated repression of protein synthesis [31,32]. Since inhibition of 26S proteasome activity could lead to the accumulation of unfolded proteins, we utilized a cell line containing a deletion of the transmembrane domain in the PERK gene (PERK-knockout cells) to examine whether PERK plays a role in mediating phosphorylation of eIF2α under the conditions of blocking the 26S proteasome function. As a positive control, treatment of cells with thapsigargin, an agent that causes ER stress and subsequently activates PERK, was shown to significantly induce phosphorylation of eIF2α in wild-type (PERK+/+ ) cells, but not in the PERK-knockout (PERK−/− ) cells, a finding consistent with the deletion of PERK in these cells (Figure 4C). As shown in Figures 4(C) and 4(D), treatment with MG-132 (50 μM) for 4 h increased the relative eIF2α phosphorylation 1.76-fold in the parental wild-type (PERK+/+ ) cells and 2.1-fold in PERKknockout (PERK−/− ) cells. Again, since continued induction of eIF2α phosphorylation by MG-132 treatment occurred even in Phosphorylation of eIF2α by HRI kinase after 26S proteasome inhibition Figure 5 585 Analysis of eIF2α phosphorylation in GCN2-knockout and HRI-knockout cells Cells were treated with MG-132 as in Figure 4, and eIF2α phosphorylation was determined by Western blotting. (A) Induction of eIF2α phosphorylation in GCN2-knockout cells after MG-132 treatment. Total eIF2α and eIF2α(P) were determined by Western-blot analysis after treatment of wild-type (GCN2+/+ ) and GCN2-knockout (GCN2−/− ) cells with 50 μM MG-132 for 4 h. (B) Quantification of the level of eIF2α phosphorylation seen in (A). The results are plotted as means + − S.E.M. (n = 3), normalized to the amount of total eIF2α. (C) Phosphorylation of eIF2α in HRI-knockout cells. The total eIF2α and eIF2α(P) were determined by Western-blot analysis after treatment of wild-type (HRI+/+ ) and HRI-knockout cells (HRI−/− ) with 50 μM MG-132 for 4 h. (D) Quantification of the level of eIF2α phosphorylation seen in (C). The results are plotted as means + − S.E.M. (n = 2). the absence of the PERK kinase, this indicates that PERK is not involved in mediating eIF2α phosphorylation after inhibition of 26S proteasome function. A third eIF2α kinase (GCN2) was similarly tested using GCN2-knockout cell lines, and again the MG-132-induced increase in eIF2α phosphorylation was not prevented by the absence of GCN2 upon exposure to 50 μM concentrations of the proteasome inhibitor MG-132 for 4 h, indicating that GCN2, usually activated by amino acid starvation, is not the primary kinase mediating proteasome inhibitor-induced eIF2α phosphorylation. As seen in Figure 5(A), treatment with MG132 increased eIF2α phosphorylation in both the wild-type and GCN2-knockout cell lines, and the quantification of normalized band densities in Figure 5(B) shows a 2.2-fold increase in eIF2α(P) in the parental wild-type cells and a 5-fold increase in GCN2-knockout cells after MG-132 exposure. The greater fold increase in eIF2α phosphorylation in the GCN2-knockout cells is presumably due to the significantly lower baseline level of phosphorylation of eIF2α in these GCN2-knockout cells, possibly indicating a GCN2 role in producing the basal levels of eIF2α phosphorylation seen in wild-type cells. Finally, we examined whether the HRI kinase plays a role in eIF2α phosphorylation using HRI-knockout cells harbouring a deletion of the HRI genes (HRI−/− cells) after proteasome inhibition. HRI is the most important eIF2α kinase in erythroid cells where it is expressed abundantly, becomes activated in the absence of haem and inhibits protein synthesis through phosphorylation of eIF2α to prevent accumulation of inactive (misfolded) globin with no haem cofactor [33]. It was therefore initially thought that HRI was unlikely to play a role in the eIF2α phosphorylation observed in non-erythroid fibroblast cells investigated in the present study. Contrary to our expectations, MEF cells that lacked HRI showed almost none of the eIF2α phosphorylation seen in parental MEF cells after 50 μM MG-132 treatment for 4 h (Figures 5C and 5D). There was a 2.8-fold increase in wild-type cells, but only a non-significant 1.2-fold increase in HRI−/− cells, indicating that HRI is the major eIF2α kinase involved in the increased phosphorylation of eIF2α in response to inhibition of the 26S proteasome. While the 20 % increase in phosphorylation still observed in HRI−/− cells might be within the range of experimental error, it could also imply that there is another kinase, probably playing a secondary role, which phosphorylates eIF2α during 26S proteasome inhibition. Although MG-132 has been a widely used proteasome inhibitor and is considered to be quite specific, there has been some evidence that it may have inhibitory effects on other proteases (e.g. calpains, cathepsins and cysteine proteases) [34,35]. Therefore HRI+/+ and HRI−/− cells were also treated with various concentrations of Bortezomib, a highly selective and novel dipeptide boronate proteasome inhibitor [36]. Since the effective concentration of Bortezomib varies in different cell lines, we tested a wide range of inhibitor concentrations. As can be seen in Figure 6, Western-blot analysis demonstrated that eIF2α is significantly phosphorylated in HRI+/+ cells exposed to various c The Authors Journal compilation c 2008 Biochemical Society 586 A. Yerlikaya, S. R. Kimball and B. A. Stanley Figure 6 Effect of Bortezomib on eIF2α phosphorylation in HRI wild-type and HRI-knockout cells (A) Cells were treated for 4 h with the various concentrations of Bortezomib indicated above the lanes, and eIF2α phosphorylation level was determined by Western-blot analysis. (B) Quantification of the level of eIF2α phosphorylation in HRI wild-type and HRI-knockout cells. The experiment shown in (A) was carried out in triplicate and the results shown in (B) are the mean + − S.D. (n = 3). concentrations of Bortezomib (0.1–10 μM) for 4 h; however, no change in the level of eIF2α phosphorylation could be seen in the knockout HRI−/− cells at any Bortezomib concentration. Taken together, the MG-132 and Bortezomib results indicate that eIF2α phosphorylation was induced specifically by 26S proteasome inhibition and that HRI is the primary kinase mediating eIF2α phosphorylation in response to 26S proteasome inhibition. DISCUSSION The 26S proteasome has been shown to be involved in the various biologically important processes, such as the cell cycle, cellular metabolism, apoptosis, signal transduction, the immune response and protein quality control [37], and decreases in protein synthesis rate caused by inhibition of the 26S proteasome have been previously reported [9,10]. Decreases in protein synthesis after longer periods of 26S proteasome inhibition have been noted to accompany induction of apoptosis [14,16,22,23,39]; however, no evidence of apoptosis was observed in the current experiments at the very early time points where inhibition of the 26S proteasome clearly caused decreased protein synthesis rates, nor were protein synthesis rates restored upon inhibition of apoptosis-related caspases. These results strongly suggest that the loss of protein synthesis activity after inhibition of the 26S proteasome is independent of the induction of apoptosis. Previously, Brophy et al. [40] have also indicated that MG-132 treatment does not stimulate apoptosis in COS-7 cells; in fact, they showed that when COS-7 cells were pretreated with the proteasome inhibitors before addition of staurosporine (a known inducer of apoptosis in many cell lines), both caspase 3 activity and percentage of apoptotic cells were reduced as compared with the cells treated with staurosporine alone. As others have observed, we showed that the apoptosisindependent inhibition of protein synthesis that occurs after brief inhibition of 26S proteasome function is likely due to elevated eIF2α phosphorylation [38]. Of the four protein kinases known to phosphorylate eIF2α, the results presented here indicate for the c The Authors Journal compilation c 2008 Biochemical Society first time that HRI is the primary kinase activated by inhibition of the 26S proteasome. While it is well known that HRI mediates phosphorylation of eIF2α and is expressed at a significant level in erythroid cells, several previous studies have also provided evidence that HRI is a ubiquitous eIF2α kinase of mammalian cells and is expressed in a wide range of non-erythroid cells [41,42]. The present study clearly demonstrates that the HRI kinase can mediate translational attenuation in non-erythroid cells, although the mechanism of activation of the kinase is not yet clear. A previous study reported that eIF2α was significantly phosphorylated in GCN2 wild-type cells treated with 1 μM MG-132 but that MG-132-induced phosphorylation of this translational initiation factor was greatly decreased in knockout GCN2−/− cells; however, a closer examination of the results in that paper shows increasing phosphorylation of eIF2α even in the knockout GCN2−/− cells at later time points of treatment with MG-132, e.g. after 6 h [11]. This suggests that another kinase might also be involved, albeit more slowly, at those lower MG-132 doses. We did not observe any reduction in eIF2α phosphorylation in GCN2−/− cells in response to 26S proteasome inhibition under our experimental conditions; the different results obtained in the present study may be partly due to the different concentrations used (1 μM versus 50 μM MG-132 in our study). The concentration used in our study {a standard dose that has been used in many studies of 26S proteasome inhibition (see e.g. [43,44])} may cause more complete or more rapid activation of HRI than the lower dose used in the study of Jiang and Wek [11], where possible phosphorylation of eIF2α in the absence of GCN2 only occurred at later time points (an HRI kinase knockout was not tested in those experiments); under the conditions tested in the current experiments, GCN2 kinase activity may still have been activated, but contributing a relatively minor portion of the observed eIF2α phosphorylation compared with that arising from HRI kinase activity. Thus, in the GCN2−/− cells tested herein, no appreciable decrease in MG-132-stimulated phosphorylation would be observable because of the still-present and dominant eIF2α phosphorylation occurring through HRI. The activation of HRI might be attained by several different mechanisms, including possible interactions with Hsp proteins. Previous studies indicated that proteasome inhibitors enhance the expression of Hsp70 and Hsp27 without heat shock in MEF [45] as well as Hsp90 expression in lens cells [46]. In addition, another study showed that Hsp70 or Hsp90 is required for folding and transformation of HRI into an active kinase in rabbit reticulocyte lysates and, in living cells, Hsp70 is essential for the activation of HRI under stress conditions [47]. Further experiments are required to investigate links between the HRI activation and Hsp proteins during proteasome inhibition in living cells. In summary, the results presented here reveal that inhibition of the 26S proteasome results in repression of global protein synthesis through elevated phosphorylation of eIF2α, mediated primarily through activation of HRI kinase activity. Given that proteasome inhibition induces apoptosis in several experimental models through the accumulation of a number of pro-apoptotic proteins such as Bax, Bid, CDK inhibitors (p21 and p27) and p53, several 26S proteasome inhibitors are currently being tested in clinical trials as anticancer agents that would induce apoptosis in rapidly proliferating cells. Specifically, Bortezomib has been approved for the treatment of multiple myeloma [48]. In spite of the obvious efficacy of Bortezomib in many cases, a Phase II trial of Bortezomib treatment in 202 patients with refractory relapsed multiple myeloma demonstrated that as many as 65 % of patients did not respond to treatment [49]. Other studies indicate that resistance to proteasome inhibition, which may account for some of the non-responsive patients in the Bortezomib study Phosphorylation of eIF2α by HRI kinase after 26S proteasome inhibition cited above, may be partly due to induction of Hsp70, which is known to be an inhibitor of apoptosis acting by preventing the processing of caspases into active forms [50]. Induction of Hsp70 would also be expected to enable HRI kinase activation as mentioned above, and increased phosphorylation of eIF2α and the resulting decrease in protein synthesis rate in some patients might prevent the accumulation of normally rapidly degraded proteins, proteins whose increased levels would play an important and necessary role in the apoptotic effects of proteasome inhibition. While inhibitors like Bortezomib appear to be highly specific for 26S proteasome inhibition, a better understanding of the downstream effects of 26S proteasome inhibition and the extent to which they differ between different patients may be important for understanding the differences between inhibitor-responsive and inhibitor non-responsive patients in multiple myeloma and possibly other cancer patients. Further experiments will greatly increase our understanding of molecular links between the 26S proteasome inhibition and eIF2α phosphorylation, and information obtained from such experiments may help to define novel molecular targets and therapeutic strategies to overcome what appears to be clinical resistance to proteasome inhibition in some patients. We thank Dr Isis Rivera-Walsh (Department of Microbiology and Immunology, The Pennsylvania State University College of Medicine, Hershey, PA, U.S.A.) for excellent assistance with the flow cytometry-based apoptosis assays, and Dr An Do and Rick Horetsky (both from the Department of Cellular and Molecular Physiology, The Pennsylvania State University College of Medicine, Hershey, PA, U.S.A.) for help with eIF2α phosphorylation analysis in GCN2- and HRI-knockout cells. This work was supported by the NSF (National Science Foundation) grant MCB-9603740 (to B.A.S.) and the NIH (National Institutes of Health) grant DK-13499 (to S.R.K.). REFERENCES 1 Hershey, J. W. (1991) Translational control in mammalian cells. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 60, 717–755 2 Kimball, S. R. (1999) Eukaryotic initiation factor eIF2. Int. J. Biochem. Cell Biol. 31, 25–29 3 Satoh, S., Hijikata, M., Handa, H. and Shimotohno, K. (1999) Caspase-mediated cleavage of eukaryotic translation initiation factor subunit 2α. Biochem. J. 342, 65–70 4 Pain, V. M. (1996) Initiation of protein synthesis in eukaryotic cells. Eur. J. Biochem. 236, 747–771 5 Marissen, W. E., Guo, Y., Thomas, A. A., Matts, R. L. and Lloyd, R. E. (2000) Identification of caspase 3-mediated cleavage and functional alteration of eukaryotic initiation factor 2α in apoptosis. J. Biol. Chem. 275, 9314–9323 6 Kumar, K. U., Srivastava, S. P. and Kaufman, R. J. (1999) Double-stranded RNA-activated protein kinase (PKR) is negatively regulated by 60S ribosomal subunit protein L18. Mol. Cell. Biol. 19, 1116–1125 7 Harding, H. P., Zeng, H., Zhang, Y., Jungries, R., Chung, P., Plesken, H., Sabatini, D. D. and Ron, D. (2001) Diabetes mellitus and exocrine pancreatic dysfunction in Perk−/− mice reveals a role for translational control in secretory cell survival. Mol. Cell 7, 1153–1163 8 Hilt, W. and Wolf, D. H. (1996) Proteasomes: destruction as a programme. Trends Biochem. Sci. 21, 96–102 9 Schubert, U., Anton, L. C., Gibbs, J., Norbury, C. C., Yewdell, J. W. and Bennink, J. R. (2000) Rapid degradation of a large fraction of newly synthesized proteins by proteasomes. Nature 404, 770–774 10 Mimnaugh, E. G., Chen, H. Y., Davie, J. R., Celis, J. E. and Neckers, L. (1997) Rapid deubiquitination of nucleosomal histones in human tumor cells caused by proteasome inhibitors and stress response inducers: effects on replication, transcription, translation, and the cellular stress response. Biochemistry 36, 14418–14429 11 Jiang, H. Y. and Wek, R. C. (2005) Phosphorylation of the α-subunit of the eukaryotic initiation factor-2 (eIF2α) reduces protein synthesis and enhances apoptosis in response to proteasome inhibition. J. Biol. Chem. 280, 14189–14202 12 Bush, K. T., Goldberg, A. L. and Nigam, S. K. (1997) Proteasome inhibition leads to a heat-shock response, induction of endoplasmic reticulum chaperones, and thermotolerance. J. Biol. Chem. 272, 9086–9092 587 13 Yerlikaya, A. and Stanley, B. A. (2004) S -adenosylmethionine decarboxylase degradation by the 26 S proteasome is accelerated by substrate-mediated transamination. J. Biol. Chem. 279, 12469–12478 14 Pasquini, L. A., Besio Moreno, M., Adamo, A. M., Pasquini, J. M. and Soto, E. F. (2000) Lactacystin, a specific inhibitor of the proteasome, induces apoptosis and activates caspase-3 in cultured cerebellar granule cells. J. Neurosci. Res. 59, 601–611 15 Wagenknecht, B., Hermisson, M., Eitel, K. and Weller, M. (1999) Proteasome inhibitors induce p53/p21-independent apoptosis in human glioma cells. Cell. Physiol. Biochem. 9, 117–125 16 Drexler, H. C. (1997) Activation of the cell death program by inhibition of proteasome function. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 94, 855–860 17 Giuliano, M., Lauricella, M., Calvaruso, G., Carabillo, M., Emanuele, S., Vento, R. and Tesoriere, G. (1999) The apoptotic effects and synergistic interaction of sodium butyrate and MG132 in human retinoblastoma Y79 cells. Cancer Res. 59, 5586–5595 18 Laemmli, U. K. (1970) Cleavage of structural proteins during the assembly of the head of bacteriophage T4. Nature 227, 680–685 19 Freshney, R. I. (1994) Culture of Animal Cells: A Manual of Basic Techniques, Wiley-Liss, New York 20 Vermes, I., Haanen, C., Steffens-Nakken, H. and Reutelingsperger, C. (1995) A novel assay for apoptosis. Flow cytometric detection of phosphatidylserine expression on early apoptotic cells using fluorescein labelled Annexin V. J. Immunol. Methods 184, 39–51 21 Bradford, M. M. (1976) A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein–dye binding. Anal. Biochem. 72, 248–254 22 Naujokat, C., Sezer, O., Zinke, H., Leclere, A., Hauptmann, S. and Possinger, K. (2000) Proteasome inhibitors induced caspase-dependent apoptosis and accumulation of p21WAF1/Cip1 in human immature leukemic cells. Eur. J. Haematol. 65, 221–236 23 Drexler, H. C., Risau, W. and Konerding, M. A. (2000) Inhibition of proteasome function induces programmed cell death in proliferating endothelial cells. FASEB J. 14, 65–77 24 Marissen, W. E. and Lloyd, R. E. (1998) Eukaryotic translation initiation factor 4G is targeted for proteolytic cleavage by caspase 3 during inhibition of translation in apoptotic cells. Mol. Cell. Biol. 18, 7565–7574 25 Etchison, D., Milburn, S. C., Edery, I., Sonenberg, N. and Hershey, J. W. (1982) Inhibition of HeLa cell protein synthesis following poliovirus infection correlates with the proteolysis of a 220000-dalton polypeptide associated with eucaryotic initiation factor 3 and a cap binding protein complex. J. Biol. Chem. 257, 14806–14810 26 Babu, S. V. and Ramaiah, K. V. (1996) Type 1 phosphatase inhibitors reduce the restoration of guanine nucleotide exchange activity of eukaryotic initiation factor 2B inhibited reticulocyte lysates rescued by hemin. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 327, 201–208 27 Redpath, N. T. and Proud, C. G. (1990) Activity of protein phosphatases against initiation factor-2 and elongation factor-2. Biochem. J. 272, 175–180 28 Williams, B. R. (1999) PKR: a sentinel kinase for cellular stress. Oncogene 18, 6112–6120 29 Hershko, A. and Ciechanover, A. (1998) The ubiquitin system. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 67, 425–479 30 Kaufman, R. J. (1999) Stress signaling from the lumen of the endoplasmic reticulum: coordination of gene transcriptional and translational controls. Genes Dev. 13, 1211–1233 31 Harding, H. P., Zhang, Y. and Ron, D. (1999) Protein translation and folding are coupled by an endoplasmic-reticulum-resident kinase. Nature 397, 271–274 32 Brewer, J. W. and Diehl, J. A. (2000) PERK mediates cell-cycle exit during the mammalian unfolded protein response. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 97, 12625–12630 33 Chen, J. J. and London, I. M. (1995) Regulation of protein synthesis by heme-regulated eIF-2α kinase. Trends Biochem. Sci. 20, 105–108 34 Zhou, J., Köhl, R., Herr, B., Frank, R. and Brüne, B. (2006) Calpain mediates a von Hippel–Lindau protein-independent destruction of hypoxia-inducible factor-1. Mol. Biol. Cell 15, 1549–1558 35 Lee, D. H. and Goldberg, A. L. (1998) Proteasome inhibitors: valuable new tools for cell biologists. Trends Cell Biol. 8, 397–403 36 Adams, J., Palombella, V. J., Sausville, E. A., Johnson, J., Destree, A., Lazarus, D. D., Maas, J., Pien, C. S., Prakash, S. and Elliot, P. J. (1999) Proteasome inhibitors: a novel class of potent and effective antitumor agents. Cancer Res. 59, 2615–2622 37 Tanaka, K. (1998) Molecular biology of the proteasome. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 247, 537–541 38 Cowan, J. L. and Morley, S. J. (2004) The proteasome inhibitor, MG132, promotes the reprogramming of translation in C2C12 myoblasts and facilitates the association of hsp25 with the eIF4F complex. Eur. J. Biochem. 271, 3596–3611 39 Wagenknecht, B., Hermisson, M., Groscurth, P., Liston, P., Krammer, P. H. and Weller, M. (2000) Proteasome inhibitor-induced apoptosis of glioma cells involves the processing of multiple caspases and cytochrome c release. J. Neurochem. 75, 2288–2297 c The Authors Journal compilation c 2008 Biochemical Society 588 A. Yerlikaya, S. R. Kimball and B. A. Stanley 40 Brophy, V. A., Tavare, J. M. and Rivett, A. J. (2002) Treatment of COS-7 cells with proteasome inhibitors or gamma-interferon reduces the increase in caspase 3 activity associated with staurosporine-induced apoptosis. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 397, 199–205 41 Berlanga, J. J., Herrero, S. and de Haro, C. (1998) Characterization of the hemin-sensitive eukaryotic initiation factor 2α kinase from mouse non-erythroid cells. J. Biol. Chem. 273, 32340–32346 42 Mellor, H., Flowers, K. M., Kimball, S. R. and Jefferson, L. S. (1994) Cloning and characterization of cDNA encoding rat hemin-sensitive initiation factor-2α (eIF-2α) kinase. Evidence for multi-tissue expression. J. Biol. Chem. 269, 10201–10204 43 Tanaka, H., Miake, J., Notsu, T., Sonyama, K., Sasaki, N., litsuka, K., Kato, M., Taniguchi, S., Igawa, O. and Yoshida, A. (2005) Proteasomal degradation of Kirb.2 channel protein and its inhibition by a Na+ channel blocker aprindine. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 331, 1001–1006 44 Alao, J. P., Stavropoulou, A. V., Lam, E. W.-F., Coombes, R. C. and Vigushin, D. M. (2006) Histone deacetylase inhibitor, trichostatin A induces ubiquitin-dependent cyclin D1 degradation in MCF-7 breast cancer cells. Mol. Cancer 5, 8 Received 12 February 2008/12 February 2008; accepted 21 February 2008 Published as BJ Immediate Publication 21 February 2008, doi:10.1042/BJ20080324 c The Authors Journal compilation c 2008 Biochemical Society 45 Kim, D., Kim, S. H. and Li, G. C. (1999) Proteasome inhibitors MG132 and lactacystin hyperphosphorylate HSF1 and induce hsp70 and hsp27 expression. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 254, 264–268 46 Awasthi, N. and Wagner, B. J. (2005) Upregulation of heat shock protein expression by proteasome inhibition: an anti-apoptotic mechanism in the lens. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 46, 2082–2091 47 Lu, L., Han, A. P. and Chen, J. J. (2001) Translation initiation control by heme-regulated eukaryotic initiation factor 2α kinase in erythroid cells under cytoplasmic stresses. Mol. Cell. Biol. 21, 7971–7980 48 Adams, J. (2004) The development of proteasome inhibitors as anticancer drugs. Cancer Cell 5, 417–421 49 Richardson, P. G., Barlogie, B., Berenson, J., Singhal, S., Jagannath, S., Irwin, D., Rajkumar, S. V., Srkalovic, G., Alsina, M., Alexanian, R. et al. (2003) A phase 2 study of Bortezomib in relapsed, refractory myeloma. N. Engl. J. Med. 348, 2609–2617 50 Jones, E. L., Zhao, M. J., Stevenson, M. A. and Calderwood, S. K. (2004) The 70 kilodalton heat shock protein is an inhibitor of apoptosis in prostate cancer. Int. J. Hyperthermia 20, 835–849