* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download Sachem CSD Common Core Unit Template – AP Psychology Grade
Relational aggression wikipedia , lookup
Social dilemma wikipedia , lookup
James M. Honeycutt wikipedia , lookup
Carolyn Sherif wikipedia , lookup
Group cohesiveness wikipedia , lookup
Group dynamics wikipedia , lookup
False consensus effect wikipedia , lookup
Leon Festinger wikipedia , lookup
Social tuning wikipedia , lookup
Attribution bias wikipedia , lookup
Albert Bandura wikipedia , lookup
Attitude change wikipedia , lookup
Sachem CSD Common Core Unit Template – AP Psychology Grade: 11 and 12 Topic: Social Psychology – This part of the course focuses on how individuals relate to one another in social situations. Social psychologists study social attitudes, social influence, and other social phenomena. This topic relates to 8-10% of the curriculum as per the College Board. Therefore it is given 8-10% of teaching time in class. NYS Learning Standards/CCSS: Learning Targets: Reading Standards AP students in psychology should be able to Apply attribution theory to explain motives Describe the structure and function of different kind of group behavior Explain how individuals respond to expectations of others, including groupthink, conformity, and obedience to others Discuss attitudes and how they change Predict the impact of the presence of others on individual behavior Describe the processes that contribute to differential treatment of group members Articulate the impact of social and cultural categories on self concept and relations with others Anticipate the impact of behavior on a self fulfilling prophecy Describe the variable that contribute to altruism, aggression and attraction Discuss the attitude formation and change, including persuasion strategies and cognitive dissonance. Identify important figures in social psychology 1.Cite specific textual evidence to support analysis of primary and secondary sources, connecting insights gained from specific details to an understanding of the text as a whole. 2. Determine the central ideas or information of a primary or secondary source; provide an accurate summary that makes clear the relationships among the key details and ideas. 3. Evaluate various explanations for actions or events and determine which explanation best accords with textual evidence, acknowledging where the text leaves matters uncertain. 4.Determine the meaning of words and phrases as they are used in a text, including analyzing how an author uses and refines the meaning of a key term over the course of a text 1. Writing Standards Write arguments focused on discipline-specific content. a. Introduce precise, knowledgeable claim(s), establish the significance of the claim(s), distinguish the claim(s) from alternate or opposing claims, and create an organization that logically sequences the claim(s), counterclaims, reasons, and evidence. b. Develop claim(s) and counterclaims fairly and thoroughly, supplying the most relevant data and evidence for each while pointing out the strengths and limitations of both claim(s) and counterclaims in a discipline-appropriate form that anticipates the audience’s knowledge level, concerns, values, and possible biases. c. Use words, phrases, and clauses as well as varied syntax to link the major sections of the text, create cohesion, and clarify the relationships between claim(s) and reasons, between reasons and evidence, and between claim(s) and counterclaims. d. Establish and maintain a formal style and objective tone while attending to the norms and conventions of the discipline in which they are writing. 2. Write informative/explanatory texts, including the narration of historical events, scientific procedures/ experiments, or technical processes. April 2013 Page 1 a. Introduce a topic and organize complex ideas, concepts, and information so that each new element builds on that which precedes it to create a unified whole; include formatting (e.g., headings), graphics (e.g., figures, tables), and multimedia when useful to aiding comprehension. b. Develop the topic thoroughly by selecting the most significant and relevant facts, extended definitions, concrete details, quotations, or other information and examples appropriate to the audience’s knowledge of the topic. c. Use varied transitions and sentence structures to link the major sections of the text, create cohesion, and clarify the relationships among complex ideas and concepts. d. Use precise language, domain-specific vocabulary and techniques such as metaphor, simile, and analogy to manage the complexity of the topic; convey a knowledgeable stance in a style that responds to the discipline and context as well as to the expertise of likely readers. e. Provide a concluding statement or section that follows from and supports the information or explanation provided (e.g., articulating implications or the significance of the topic). Essential Questions: How does attribution theory explain motives? How does group behavior differ in structure and function? How do individuals respond to expectations of others, including groupthink, conformity, obedience to authority? How do we predict the impact of the presence of others on individual behavior through bystander effect and social facilitation? How do the processes contribute to differential treatment of group members, such as in group/out group, ethnocentrisms and prejudice? Articulate the impact of social and cultural categories (gender, race, ethnicity) on self- concept and relations with others. Anticipate the impact of behavior on self-fulfilling prophecy. How do and what are the variables that contribute to altruism, aggression and attraction? How do attitudes form and change? How do persuasion strategies and cognitive dissonance influence attitude form and change? How do the important figures in psychology, Asch, Festinger, Milgram and Zimbardo effectively explain concepts in regards to social psychology? April 2013 Page 2 Vocabulary Content/Domain/Text-Specific Vocabulary Attribution theory Fundamental attribution error Self-serving bias Deinvididuation Group polarization Groupthink Conformity Obedience to authority Central route to persuasion Bystander effect Social facilitation In group Out group Ethnocentrism Prejudice Gender Race Ethnicity Self-fulfilling prophecy Altruism Aggression Attraction Cognitive dissonance Solomn Asch Leon Festinger Stanley Milgram Philip Zimbardo Academic Vocabulary Disposition Aggression Altruism Expectations Attitudes Impact Phenomena Topics/Key Concepts Topica and Key concepts are the same as the vocabulary Attribution theory Fundamental attribution error Self-serving bias Deinvididuation Group polarization Groupthink Conformity Obedience to authority Central route to persuasion Bystander effect Social facilitation In group Out group Ethnocentricism April 2013 Page 3 Prejudice Gender Race Ethnicity Self-fulfilling prophecy Altruism Aggression Attraction Cognitive dissonance Solomn Asch Leon Festinger Stanley Milgram Philip Zimbardo Required Anchor Documents/Texts/Resources Chapter 18 David Myers Psychology 7th edition Common Core Aligned Writing Task Students will write during the assessment a FRQ as aligned with the AP College Board style of FRQ writing. Students are asked to present a cogent argument based on critical analysis of the question posed. They must use appropriate academic as well as content specific vocabulary. It is not enough for the students to answer a question by merely listing facts. Supplemental Documents/Texts/Resources: David Myers has additional supplemental readings called Close-Ups in the text. Please refer to Chapter 18 of the 7th edition. Suggested Activities: Have students create a poster or timeline of the experiments Have students work in groups to explain the group experiments. Have the students watch an online recreation of the experiments. April 2013 Page 4 Formative Assessments: Test on Chapter 18 – including 40 multiple choice questions from the databank provided with David Myers 7th edition Psychology, sample AP questions, teacher written questions. A 20 point FRQ as directed by the Ap college board Summative Assessments: The lessons will be based on prior readings and class discussion and lectures. Students during lessons will answer AP style selected AP questions. This will also allow the teacher to determine student performance. Guided Readings will be assigned to assist students with their comprehension for background/prior knowledge. Students will be given ample time to complete readings. April 2013 Page 5