Download Understanding the Flexibility of Floral Structure and Its Underlying

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts

History of genetic engineering wikipedia , lookup

RNA-Seq wikipedia , lookup

Human genetic variation wikipedia , lookup

Epigenetics of human development wikipedia , lookup

Artificial gene synthesis wikipedia , lookup

Nutriepigenomics wikipedia , lookup

Genome evolution wikipedia , lookup

Designer baby wikipedia , lookup

Quantitative trait locus wikipedia , lookup

Genome (book) wikipedia , lookup

Gene expression profiling wikipedia , lookup

Gene expression programming wikipedia , lookup

Microevolution wikipedia , lookup

Transcript
BCAS
Vol.30 No.1 2016
Life Sciences
Why Flowers Look so Different:
Understanding the Flexibility of
Floral Structure and Its Underlying
Mechanisms
F
lowers always show immense
diversity in their phenotypes,
including the arrangement
of floral organs that can be whorled
or spiral. In whorled flowers, the
numbers of floral organs are usually
fixed; in spiral flowers, in contrast,
the numbers of floral organs usually
show considerable variation,
suggestive of the flexibility in
the basic structure of the flower.
The underlying mechanisms of
the flexibility, however, remain
unclear. Using Nigella damascena
(Ranunculaceae) as a model, Prof.
KONG Hongzhi’s group at Institute
of Botany, Chinese Academy of
Sciences attempted to address this
question.
They found that the total number
of floral organs per flower varies
considerably within and between
individuals. Interestingly, although
all four types (i.e., sepals, petals,
stamens, and carpels) of floral organs
vary in number, stamen shows the
widest range of variation and is
the determining factor of the basic
structure of the flower. They also
showed that the total number of
floral organs per flower is largely
determined by the initial size of
the floral meristem whereas the
respective numbers of different types
of floral organs are determined by the
functional domains of corresponding
58 Bulletin of the Chinese Academy of Sciences
genetic programs. By conducting
extensive expression and functional
studies, they further elucidated the
genetic programs that specify the
identities of different types of floral
organs and the molecular mechanisms
underlying their variation. They
found that: (1) the expression patterns
Phenotypes of VIGS-treated Nigella damascena flowers.
Vol.30 No.1 2016
different floral organ identity genes,
so that a change in one gene may
cause chain reactions in others; and
(4) some floral organ identity genes
also regulate the boundaries between
different types of floral organs.
These findings suggest that the
floral organ identity determination
programs are highly dynamic
and show considerable flexibility.
Transitions from spiral to whorled
flowers, therefore, may be explained
by evolution of the mechanisms that
reduce the flexibility. These results
provide new and important insights
into the mechanisms underlying
the flexibility and evolution of the
flowers in structure.
Their work was supported
by the National Natural Science
Foundation of China and the CAS
Interdisciplinary Innovation Team
projects, and has been published in
Nature Plants.
Bulletin of the Chinese Academy of Sciences
Life Sciences
of most, if not all, floral organ
identity genes are highly dynamic
and show considerable variation
between during flower development;
(2) the dosage and duration of a gene
required for the identity determination
of one organ type may be different
from that of another, so that a small
change in the expression level of the
gene may lead to alteration of the
identity of the organ; (3) complex
regulatory relationships exist among
Science Watch
59