* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download REAL NUMBERS
Ethnomathematics wikipedia , lookup
Positional notation wikipedia , lookup
List of important publications in mathematics wikipedia , lookup
Vincent's theorem wikipedia , lookup
Surreal number wikipedia , lookup
Large numbers wikipedia , lookup
Mathematics of radio engineering wikipedia , lookup
Foundations of mathematics wikipedia , lookup
Infinitesimal wikipedia , lookup
Non-standard analysis wikipedia , lookup
Proofs of Fermat's little theorem wikipedia , lookup
Georg Cantor's first set theory article wikipedia , lookup
Hyperreal number wikipedia , lookup
System of polynomial equations wikipedia , lookup
Fundamental theorem of algebra wikipedia , lookup
CS131 Part I, Number Systems CS131 Mathematics for Computer Scientists II Note 2 REAL NUMBERS The real numbers can be thought of as corresponding to points on an infinite straight line. The set of all real numbers will be denoted by R. −2 −1 − 21 0 2 3 1 √ 2 2 e 3π An important subset of R is the set Q of rational numbers. A rational number has the form m n where m and n are integers and n 6= 0. We can always choose m and n so that n ≥ 1 and gcd(m, n) = 1. Every non-zero rational number q has an inverse q −1 with qq −1 = 1. If q = m/n (m 6= 0), then q −1 = n/m. That not all numbers are rational has been known since the time of Pythagoras (about 550 BC) and greatly affected Greek mathematics. Theorem. There is no rational number x with x2 = 2. Proof. Suppose that there is a rational number x with x2 = 2. Then we can write x = m/n where m and n are integers with gcd(m, n) = 1. This gives m2 =2 or m2 = 2n2 . 2 n 2 Hence m is even and it follows that m is even. Now we can write m = 2k for some integer k which gives 4k 2 = 2n2 or n2 = 2k 2 . Hence n2 is even so n must be even. Now we have shown that both m and n are even i.e. they have a common factor 2 which is impossible since gcd(m, n) = 1. Hence the original assumption that there is a rational x with x2 = 2 must be false. The system R of real √ numbers √ contains solutions of the equation 2 x = 2 (the numbers 2 and − 2). Real numbers of this form which are solutions of polynomial equations with rational coefficients are called algebraic numbers. The set R also contains other numbers (called transcendental numbers) such as π and e, which cannot be the solutions of polynomial equations with rational coefficients. 2–1 A real number can be thought of as a sequence of rational numbers. Every real number x has a decimal expansion which gives us a sequence of rational numbers converging to x. For example π can be thought of as the limit of the sequence 3, 3.1, 3.14, 3.141, 3.1415, 3.14159, . . . of rational numbers (we deal with sequences and their convergence later in this module). Basic Arithmetic Properties of R. All the properties of the real number system can be derived from thirteen axioms. Below we look at some elementary results which are provable in terms of these axioms. Note: although we often use the symbol ∞, it does not represent a real number and should not be treated like one. Usually, it represents the impossibility of carrying out a particular arithmetic operation, such as division. Basic Order Properties of R. Let a, b and c be real numbers. (1) Exactly one of the following three properties holds: a < b, (2) (3) (4) (5) if if if if a<b a<b a<b a<b a = b, a > b. and b < c then a < c, then a + c < b + c and c > 0 then ac < bc and c < 0 then ac > bc Further properties can now be derived from these basic ones as we now show. 1 >0 a Solution. Let a > 0. If 1/a = 0 then 1 = a.(1/a) = a.0 = 0 a contradiction. If 1/a < 0 then using property (4) to multiply both sides by the positive number a we have a.(1/a) < a.0 or 1 < 0, again a contradiction. Now by property (1) we must have a1 > 0 Problem. Show that if a > 0, then Problem. Show that if x and y are positive then x < y ⇐⇒ x2 < y 2 2–2 Solution. First we show that x < y =⇒ x2 < y 2 . If x < y then by property (4) we can multiply by x to get x2 < xy and similarly we can multiply by y to get xy < y 2 . Now by property (2) we have x2 < y 2 . Now we show the reverse implication x2 < y 2 =⇒ x < y. 2 2 2 Suppose x < y . Then using property (3) to add −x to each side we have 0 < y 2 − x2 or 0 < (y − x)(y + x). Now by property (4) we can 1 to get 0 < y − x i.e. x < y. multiply both sides by y+x Intervals. A set of real numbers is called an interval if it has one of the following forms for some a, b ∈ R: [a, b] = {x|a ≤ x ≤ b} (a, ∞) = {x|x > a} (a, b] = {x|a < x ≤ b} [a, ∞) = {x|x ≥ a} [a, b) = {x|a ≤ x < b} (−∞, a) = {x|x < a} (a, b) = {x|a < x < b} (−∞, a] = {x|x ≤ a} Intervals of the form (a, b), (−∞, a), (a, ∞) are called open. Intervals of the form [a, b], [−∞, a], [a, ∞] are called closed. Roots. Let n be an integer with n ≥ 2. For any real number a ≥ 0 there is exactly one x ≥ 0 with xn = a. This number x is called the nth root of a and is 1 denoted by a n . For any a, b ∈ R with a, b ≥ 0 and any integer n ≥ 2 we have a < b ⇐⇒ a1/n < b1/n . √ √ 1 When n = 2 we write a 2 as a. Note that a is the unique positive square root of a. So for a ≥ 0 we have √ √ x2 = a ⇐⇒ x √ = a or √x = − a x2 < a ⇐⇒ − a < x < a. Modulus. The modulus (or absolute value) |x| of a real number x is defined by x if x ≥ 0 |x| = −x if x < 0 √ Note that |x| = x2 for every real number x. y = |x| y 6 @ @ 2–3 - x Properties of the modulus. For any real numbers x and y: (1) (2) (3) (4) −|x| ≤ x ≤ |x|, |xy| = |x||y|, |x + y| ≤ |x| + |y|, |x| − |y| ≤ |x − y|. To prove property (1) note that x is equal to one of the numbers |x| or −|x|. The other properties follow from similar results concerning the modulus of a complex number which will be treated in the next Note. Upper bound, lower bound, supremum and infimum. Let S be a set of real numbers. A real number u is called an upper bound of S if x ≤ u for all x ∈ S. A real number l is called a lower bound of S if l ≤ x for every x ∈ S. A real number U is called the least upper bound (supremum) of S if U is an upper bound of S and U ≤ u for every upper bound u of S. A real number L is called the greatest lower bound (infimum) of S if L is a lower bound of S and l ≤ L for every lower bound l of S. Completeness Property of R. Every non-empty set of real numbers which has an upper bound has a least upper bound. Every non-empty set of real numbers which has a lower bound has a greatest lower bound. The real numbers are completely characterized by twelve basic arithmetic and order properties and the Completeness Property. Any theorem about real numbers can (eventually) be derived from these. Also any structure satisfying these properties can be shown to be essentially identical to R. In particular the Completeness Property implies that the set {x ∈ R|x2 < 2} has a least upper bound and it follows from this that there is a real number x with x2 = 2. 2–4 Important consequence of the Completeness Property • The Archimedean Property of R If is a real number with > 0 then there is an integer n > 0 with 1/n < • Between any two distinct real numbers there are both rational and irrational numbers • Every real number can be represented by a (possibly infinite) decimal expansion ABSTRACT Content Real numbers, order properties, intervals, modulus function. In this Note the real number system and its properties are introduced. We also study a further important method of mathematical proof - Proof by Contradiction. This approach was also created by the Greeks and is sometimes known as Reductio ad absurdum. Real intervals and the modulus function are also defined. History For many years the concept of a negative number was rejected although the Chinese had been using it as early as 100 BC. One of the first to give them open-minded consideration was the Italian Leonardo da Pisa (1170 - 1250 AD), often referred to as ’Fibonacci’. He accepted that negative numbers were needed to complete the solution of algebraic equations. Nevertheless, negative numbers were not fully accepted until the 16th century when another Italian, Girolamo Cardano, published the laws which govern them. He also proposed yet another kind of number the ’fictitious’ number - which met yet further resistance for many years but ultimately was accepted and called a ’complex’ number. In modern mathematics, negative numbers (indeed all numbers) are best accepted as abstractions and need have no physical meaning. 2–5