* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download AP Psych Rapid Review
Social dilemma wikipedia , lookup
Attitude (psychology) wikipedia , lookup
Introspection illusion wikipedia , lookup
Attitude change wikipedia , lookup
Belongingness wikipedia , lookup
Albert Bandura wikipedia , lookup
Social loafing wikipedia , lookup
Impression formation wikipedia , lookup
Social tuning wikipedia , lookup
In-group favoritism wikipedia , lookup
Group dynamics wikipedia , lookup
Communication in small groups wikipedia , lookup
False consensus effect wikipedia , lookup
AP Psych Rapid Review Unit 14 Social Psychology 8%-10% Attributing Behavior to Persons or to Situations Attribution Why theory people behave the way they do We credit a person’s behavior with either their traits (disposition) OR the situation (environment) Dispositional vs. situational attribution Actor-Observer Bias: attribute oue own behavior to situation & behavior of others to personal causes Fundamental attribution error tendency for observers, when analyzing another’s behavior, to underestimate the impact of the situation and to overestimate the impact of personality traits Self-serving bias We attribute our own success to traits we have (dispositional) and our failures to situational factors …all of this can lead to… Just-World People Phenomenon: get what they deserve Illusion of control Leon Festinger Attitudes Cognitive Dissonance Causes individuals to change attitudes Relief from tension a.) discrepancy between 2 thoughts or thoughts & action that b.) causes us tensions Ex. Smoking Self-fulfilling prophecies Tendency to let our preconceived expectations of others influence how we treat them, bringing about the very behavior we expected. Rosenthal Study…teacher expectations Frustration-Aggression Principle In-Group / Out-Group Favor “us” Prejudice: unjustified negative attitude Discrimination: unjustified behavior Bothe arise from stereotypes: mental schemas society attributes to different groups Scapegoat theory: prejudice offers an outlet for anger by blaming the victim 3 ingredients to liking someone: Proximity Mere exposure effect Physical attractiveness Similarity intimacy passion commitment Social Facilitation stronger of others responses in presence Social exert Loafing less effort when common goal Deindividuation the loss of self-awareness and selfrestraint occurring in group situations that foster arousal and anonymity. • Group Polarization – the enhancement of a group’s prevailing inclinations through discussion with the groups Groupthink desire for harmony in a decision-making group overrides a realistic alternatives Superordinate Goals Muzafer Sherif Conflicting groups get along when have a common task Conformity • Adjusting behavior\thinking toward group standard • Solomon Asch study Conditions That Strengthen Conformity • One is made to feel incompetent • Group has at least three people • Group is unanimous • One admires the group’s status • One has made no prior commitment • Others in group observe one’s behavior • One’s culture strongly encourages respect for social standards Stanford Prison Study (Philip Zimbardo) Reasons for Conforming: Normative social influence desire to gain approval or avoid disapproval. (to be seen as normal) Informational social influence willingness to accept other’s opinions about reality 66% obeyed Stanley Milgram Obedience Study Complying with a demand “Teacher”: confederate “Learner”: subject; didn’t know the “teacher” was a confederate Least likely to obey when: Someone else speaks up Authority figure not close Not associated w/ prestigious univ. If victim is depersonalized…see higher obedience Persuasion Central Route Persuasion persuaded by factual information consider the “heart” of the matter more durable & more likely to influence behavior Peripheral Route Persuasion indirect does NOT give factual info swayed by celebrity endorsements superficial The Foot-in-the-Door Phenomenon Tendency to comply with a large request if we already complied with a smaller request Altruism Kitty Genovese Darley & Latane Bystander effect for bystander to be “Seizure Experiment” less likely to help if others are Confederates faked present seizure Tendency Diffusion of Responsibility less personal responsibility as the group gets larger Feel (IV) of the study was the number of persons (bystanders) (DV) was the time it took for the participant to react GRIT – Graduated and Reciprocated Initiatives in Tension-Reduction. Strategy for reduction of international tensions through win-win attitudes and communication. Reciprocity norm we should return help to those who have helped us Social-responsibility we help those who need our help norm