* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download Organelle Division and Cytoplasmic Inheritance
Survey
Document related concepts
Transcript
Organelle Division and Cytoplasmic Inheritance The origin and basis of the transmission of organelle genomes Tsuneyoshi Kuroiwa and Hidenobu Uchida O ur current understanding of cytoplasmic inheritance is that most instances result from the transmission of mitochondrial and plastid genomes from parent{s) to progeny. The prevalent view regarding the origin of the mirochondria and plastids is that they were modified from prokaryotic endosymbionts during eukaryotic evolution (Gray 1992, Margulis 1970). According to this hyporhesis, mitochondria and plastids originated as a purpIe bacteria and cyanobacteria, respecrively (Figure 1-1). This hypothesis suggests that originaHy, during asexual cell division in unicellular eukaryotes, organelles reproduced in the parent cell and then separated into daughter cells {Figure 1-11). This process is called cytoplasmie inheritance in asexual reproduction. During the evolution from haploid to diploid organisms, sexual reproduction, which aIJows variation within a population, must have arisen in unieellular eukaryotes thar display unicellular isogamy [i.e., the gametes are similar in size or activity; Figure i-lII), mu.lticellular anisogamy (i.e., ehe gametes are slightly different in size or activity; Tsuneyoshi Kuroiwa is a professor in the Department of Biological Sciences, Graduare School of Science, University of Tokyo, Hongo, Tokyo 113, Japan. Hidenobu Uchida is a research associate in the Institute of Biological Seiences, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba 305, Japan. © 1996 American Institute of Biological Sciences. December 1996 Cytoplasmic inheritance occurs in asexually and sexually reproducing orgamsms Figure i-IV), and oogamy (i.e., the gametes are very different in size and activity-they are eggs and sperm cells, or spermsj Figure I-V). The process by which organelles are partitioned into gametes and zygotes or fertilized eggs is ca Iled cytoplasrnic inheritance related to sexual reproduction. Cyroplasmic inheritance in asexual reproduction occurs still in vegetative growth in sexually reproducing organisms (Figure 1-111). The transmission of organelle DNAs of the male and female parents to their progeny represents the next stagc in the evolution of cytoplasmie inheritance. In primitive cytoplasmic inheritance in sexual reproduction, male- and fema lederived organelles are mixed in a zygote, and in some cases fused, permitting recombination of their plastid DNA (ptDNA; Sager 1972). The recomhination of mitoehondrial DNA (mtDNA), which depends on mitochondrial plasmids and thus is analogous to bacrerial sex (conjugation}, is seen in the slime mold Physarum polycephalum (Kawano et a1. 1995). In more advanced forms of cytoplasmic inheritance, uni parental transmission.of plastid genes is gen- erally seen. Uniparental transmission of plastid genes oecurs in the isogamous green alga Chlamydomonas reinhardtii (Sager 1954) and is due to rapid destruction of the plastid nuclei (plastid nudeoids; complex of ptDNA and proteins) from one parent during isogamous sexual reproduetion (Kuroiwa et al. 1982). Uniparental inheritance and preferential destruction of organelle nuclei containing mtDNA and ptDNA from one parent are also apparent in anisogamous and oogamous eukaryotes (Kuroiwa 1991). Usually, cytoplasmie inheritance of organelle genomes has been used to denote events of sexual reproduetion. However, cytoplasmic inheritanee in asexual reproduetion should also be recognized as a basic type of cytoplasmic inheritance. In this article, we describe recenr findings regarding the meehanisms of organelle genome transmission in asexually reproducing red algae, isogamous green algae, and isogamous and oogamous plants, in order of I-V in Figure 1. Plastid-dividing ring and mitochondria-dividing ring During the process of cytoplasmic inheritance in asexual reproduction, mitoehondria and plastids reproduce in the parent cell and then separate into daughter cells (Figure 1-11). Mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) and plastid DNA (ptDNA) can be routinely observed as organelle nuclei in various organisms using high-resolution epifluorescence microscopy 827 Sexual reproduction t'::\E99 Oogamy .0 Isogamy Sperm cell ~1:r or M-.- '"" .. e m y e V ~ JV t Sperm ---1---* M-,- -l. C,,, ~~® c-\ t "~~ml ~ [lJ C0°!0°! (fJ (;) 0° ~ . . . o CIAr CIAr ~. 0 ~l;~O-:;~J~ ••• Asexual PLANTAE FUNGI reproduction ANIMALIA c aO C°,,- ) 0:1 f(161 eh) "'0 tiJ~;~ b 9 (Kuroiwa 1991). Previous reports using these techniques showed that mitochondrial and plastid divisions can be clearly separated into two main events: division of the organelle nuc1ei, and division of the rest of the organelles, or organellokinesis (mitochondriokinesis and plasridkinesis), which is analogous to cytokinesis {Kuroiwa 1982). We have recently reviewed molecular and cellular mechanisms of mitochondrial nuclear division (Kuroiwa et al. 1994). Hefe we describe the cytological mechan isms involved in mitochondriokinesis and plastidklnesis in unicellular red algae, such 828 Pigure 1. Aseries of evolutionary events in eukaryoric cells showing origin of eukaryotes (I), asexual reproduction (II), an~ sexual reproduction in isogamy (lII), amsogamy (IV), and oogamy (V). When mitochondria and plastids originated from bacteria (Ia--c) and cyanobactena (Id), respectively, their cytoplasmic inheritance (CIAr) occurred in llnicellu~ lar organisms with asexual reproducrion (11) and was mainrained during cell division in isogamous, anisogamous, and oogamous organisrns with sexual reproducrion (III-V). When eukaryores developed sexual reproduction, cytoplasmic inheritance (CISr) occurred in isogamous organisms (III). The preferential digestion of organelle nuclei (nucleoids) from the one parent occurs soon after mating in organisms of isogamy (III-*) and before ferrilization in those of anisogamy (IV-*) and 00gamy (V-*). Squares e cells; large circles with a dot in squares = cell nuclei; small solid circles in squares = plastids, open circles in squares e mitochondria; M = meiosis; a =origin of life; b = ancestral prokaryote; c = c purpIe bactenum, d ::: cyanobacterium; e = ancestral eukaryote; f ::: ancestral eukaryore with mitochondrion; and g = ancestral eukaryore with mitochondrion and plastid. I d as Cyanidioschyzon merolae and Cyanidium caldarium, which may be among the most primitive eukaryotes (Seckbach 1991). There is no evidence of any significant structural elements that are obviously related to mirochondrial division in eukaryores, despite the factthat mitochondrial division commonly occurs in eukaryotes and is inhibited in P. polycephalum by the drug cytochalasin B, which disrupts actin fi lamen ts (Kuroiwa and Kuroiwa 1980). By contrast, a plastid-dividing ring (PD-ring) is found on the cytoplasmic face of the outer membrane of the envelope at the constricted isthmus of dividing chloroplasts in many algae and plants (Figure 2a, b; Duckett and Ligrone 1993, Kuroiwa 1991, Mita et a1 1986, Suzuki et al. 1994). Because these observations have followed a general trend in which the PD-rings in primitive unicellular eukaryotes, such as C. caldarium, are larger rhan those of multiplastidic cells in land plants, we hypothesized that unknown mirochondrion-dividing rings (MD-rings) might follow a similar trend. Thus we set out to observe a primitive ce1l. The cells of C. merolae, which has a smaller nuclear genome than C. caldarium (Suzuki et al. 1994). are only 2 um in diameter. They conrain a nucleus, one mirochondrion, and one chloroplast (arranged in rhar order), and they prcliferate by binary division (Figure 3a; De Luca et a1. 1978). After an extensive search for MD-rings in various organisms, we identified an MD-ring and a PD-ring, respecrively, in the equatorial regions of the dividing mitochondrion and chloroplastof C. merolae (Figure 3aII-alV, b-f; Knroiwa et al. 1993, 1995). BioScience Val. 46 No. 11 The initial sign of MD-ring formation is the movement of a microbody to the region between the mitochondrion and the ceIl nucleus (Figure 3al, aIl). An MD-ring that is 40-nm wide and 40-nm thick forms in the cytoplasm at the point ar which the microbody has atrached to the mitoehondrion. Furtherrnore, the MD- and PD-rings form at approximately the same time. The spherical rnicrobody begins to elongate along the MD-ring, and the end of the microbody is associated with the PD-ring (Figure 3aIII). When chloroplast division is in progress, the dense material of the PD-ring appears clearly at the consrricted isthmus of the dumbbell-shaped chloroplast (Kuroiwa er al. 1995). Electron microscopic images of six serial thin secrions from the cell in the stage of Figure 3alV show that the MD-ring in the cytoplasmic side is cireular arid becomes noticeably wider and thicker after the completion of chloroplast division (Figure 3aIV, b-e). In cornputer-reconstructed images of the ceIl in the stage of Figure 3aIII, the large but narrow MD-ring and the small but thick PD-ring are clearly seen at rhe equatorial regions of the dividing mitochondrion and chloroplast, respeetively (Figure 3g). These results suggest that the arnount of the substance that makes up the MD-ring remains constant throughout the mitochondrial division. A sharp furrow forms in the mitochondrion as a result of MD ring coritraction, and the MD-ring probably generates the consrricrive force that separates the daughter mitochondria. The MD-ring disappears, as if rnarerials of the MD~ring are eonverted into the dividing elongated microbody. Following nuclear division, the mierobody divides completely to form two daughter rnicrobodies, and cytokinesis occurs (Figure 3aV, aVI). An association between ehe PDring and microbodies has also been observed in the algae (Kuroiwa 1991). In C. caldarium, just before the formation of the PD-ring, many Golgi vesicles are found distributed between the microbody and the bundle of filaments that make up the PD-ring. However, in C. merolae, rhese small vesicles are not observed at the equatorial regions of organelles December 1996 '", .~ . ", '. I: ... ' .' b Figure 2. Electron micrographs of the PD-rings at the constricted isthmus of the dividing chloroplasts in cells during rhe first (a) and rhe second (b) endospore divisions in Cyanidium caldarium RK-l. The PD-rings (arrows) can be seen clearly on the cytoplasmic side of the ourer envelope. Bar = 0.1 um, [usr before the formation of the MDand PD-rings. Accordingly, microbodies may control the organelle division by direct association in some organisms, such as C. merolae, and indirectly in C. caldarium, Microbodies are common in eukaryotes and eonsist of at least two types: glyoxysomes and peroxisornes, both of which contain caralase, an enzyme that breaks down hydrogen peroxide into water and oxygen (Giese 1979). To the known functions of microbodies, we can thus add the control of mitochondrial and plastid division, at least in certa in organisms, The cornponents of the PD- and MD-rings have not yet been identified. The ultrastructural behaviors of the PD- and MD -rings observed in c. merolae are similar to those of the PD-ring in C. caldarium (Figure 2a, b, Kuroiwa 1991). Several results support rhe hypothesis that the PDring in C. caldarium is a bundle of actinlike filaments [Kuroiwa 1991). For one, the PD-ring of C. caldarium is labeled by rhodamine-conjugated phalloidin (phalloidin binds to actin filaments, and the fluorescenee of the attached rhodamine ean be detected by fluoreseence microscopy). In addition, fine filaments 6-nm in diameter (consistent with actin) were seen in transmission electron rnicrographs of aPO-ring. Finally, cy- tochalasin B inhibits the formation of the PD-ring as weIl as the actin contracrile ring that plays a role in cytokinesis (Kuroiwa 1991). These results suggest that the PD-ring of C. caldarium is a bundle of actin filaments, However, the PD-ringcannot be detected by anri-acrin antibodies raised against chieken gizzard acrins. We also examined whether actin is conrained in the MD- and PD-rings and the mierobody in C. merolae. However, although C. merolae does contain an actin gene, we were unable to detect actin filaments in the PD- and MDrings by rhodarnine-phalloidin staining and labeling with the anti-actin antibodies (Ta kah ashi et al. 1995). One possible explanation is that C. caldarium and C. merolae contain a more primitive actin or actinlike proteins that cannot be detected by antibodies against chicken gizzard actins. Why do we never see the MD-ring around the mitochondria in organisms other than C. merolae? We believe that there must be a structure analogous to the MD-ring in other organisms, Perhaps the MDring is simpler in more highly evolved organisms. The mitochondria in higher organisms might divide with use of a much finer ring, for example, which we cannot yet visualize, 829 a c Figure 3. Diagrammatic summary of organelle division (a), elecrron rnicrographs of five serial sections of.the MD-ring from the cel! in the stage of Figure 3aIV (bf), and a videoframe photograph of the films of transmission electron micrograph images of three consecutive serial sections of the cell in rhe stage of Figure 3aIII (g) in Cyanidioscbyzon merolae. The major evenrs in C. merolae (a] are the movement of the microbody to the region between rhe mitochondrion and cell nucleus (1, Il); the forrnation of rhe MD-ring and PD-ring after association with the microbody (II); the elongation of the microbody along the MD -ring and the differential contraction of MD- and PD-ring (IIl); the conversion of materials from MD- and PD-ring to the microbody (IV); the cornpl etion of mitochondrial and chloroplast divisions (V); and the completion of a nuclear division before cytokinesis (VI). Serial thin sections show rhat the MD-ring is a circular ring located on the cytoplasmic side of the outer membrane (b-f). The films from three sections were overlaid using the color image processor (g). A video-frame photograph of the films shows that the large but fine MD-ring and the small but thick PD-ring are visible ar the equatorial region of the dividing mitochondrion and the dividing chloroplasr, respecrively. Asterisks = microbodies; small arrows on mitochondria = MD-rings; large arrows on chloroplasts = PD rings; N = cell nudei; M = mitochondria; C = chloroplasts; shaded regions = DNA-containing regions, Bar = 0.5 um, Immuno-electron microscopy using antihodies to the bacterial FtsZ (filamentation temperature sensitive) protein shows that in Eschericbia coli and Staphylococcus aureus, the FtsZ prorein forrns a ring at the leading edge of the cell division site (Bi and Lutkenhaus 1991, Lutkenhaus 1993). A similar protein may 830 be present in chloroplasts of the higher plant Arabidopsis and thus involved in the divi sion of eukaryotic organelles (Osteryoung and Vierling 1995). However, a ring of FtsZ protein has never been observed directly in bacteria by transmission e1ectron microscopy. Accordingly, if we obtain antibodies against corn- ponents of the PD- and MD-rings, we may be able to identify these structures in the equatorial region of dividing organelles, even in higher organisms. If organelles are descended from bacterial endosymbionts, there may ha ve been a dividing ring such as the FtsZ ring inside chloroplasts and mitochondria at an early stage of evolution (Figure I-H, Ig). However, the nucleus eventually came to control the organelle division from the outside, using PD- and MD-rings made from actinlike proteins that are encoded in the nuclear genorne (Figure l-II). The organelle division described above is a step of cyroplasrnic inheritance in asexually reproducing organisms with a simple life cycle such as C. caladrium and C. merolae. The separation of organelles following their divisions to daughter cells is also important for eytoplasmic inheritance in asexual reproduction. In rhe yeast Saccharomyces cereuisiae, uni parental (maternal or paternal) inheritance of mitochondrial genetic markers is thought to be due to vegetative segregation, such as the random partitioning of mirochondria by cell division (Birky 1983). Russe! (1984) and Sodmergen et al. (1995) have shown that in the higher plant Plumbago zeylanica, the internal polarity of plastids in the generative cell generates two different sperm cells after the second pollen mitosis. Such preferential movement oE plastids may furnish the key to understanding the mechanism of separation of organelles. Relocation of the huge genes from bacterial endosymbionts Ir is unknown whether or not the relocation of the huge genes from bacterial endosymbionts to the nuclear genome occurred before the nucleus came to contro! organelle di vision using PD- and MD-rings. Because several genes in plastids have relocated from the plasrid to the nuclear genome as algae and land plants evolved (Gillham 1994, Ohta er al. 1994), we expected that the organelles of more primitive eukaryotes might have larger genomes than more advanced ones. The genome sizes of the mitochondrion and plas- BioScience Val. 46 No. 11 tid in the primitive alga C. merolae are approximately 32 kilobase pairs (kb) and 150 kb, respectively (Ohta et al. 1994), and thus both genomes are smaller than or approximately the same size as those of the organelles of algae and land planes (Gillham 1994, Palmer 1992, Reith and Munholland 1993). Beeause the genornes of free-living bacteria are larger than 1 mega base pair (Mbp; Lima-de-Faria 1983), the surprising similarity of the organelle genome sizes from simple red algae to land plants suggests that thenucleus must have commandeered more than 80% of the genome of free-living prokaryotes early in the transition from symbiotic bacteria to organelles (Figure 1-1). There must be acrive mechanisms or genes in the host nucleus to relocate huge genes from free-living prokaryotes ro the nucleus. Cytoplasmic inheritance in isogamous algae During the evolution from haploid to diploid organisms, sexual reproduetion evolved in unicellular eukaryotes with differentiated isogamous gametes, and a new kind of plastid and mitoehondrial inheritanee related to sexual reproduction may have evolved (Figure 1-III). In this primitive cytoplasrnic inheritanee in sexual reproduction, the organelles from male and female gametes would possibly be mixed in a zygote, and in some cases fuse to bring about recombination of their organelleDNA (Kawano etal. 1995}. In rnore evolved organisms, organelle DNA from male or female gametes follows uniparental transrnission to progeny. A rnechanism of uniparental inheritance that is seen in the isogamous alga C. reinhardtii (Figure 4) is the preferential digestion in zygotes of one parent's plastid genome by nucleases. The transmission patterns of chloroplast and mitoehondrial genes have been studied in many plants and animals (Gillham 1994, Gillham et al. 1991, Kuroiwa 1991, Sears 1980, Smith 1988). We foeus he re on the rnechanisrns of cytoplasmic inheritance of plastids in C. reinhardtii from a cytological perspective, with an emphasis on the concept of or- December 1996 T i m e ( h) a ft e r m a t i n q Figure 4. Summary 2 1 o of the representative events of cell nuclei and chloroplast n uc l e i in young C. reinbardtii zygotes du ring the first rwo hours (a ), and epifluoresc ence photom icrographs of a zygote 10 minutes (b) and 40 minutes (c) after mixing of mt: and mt" garnetes. Preferenrial digestion of ptDNA from mt: parent occurs wirhin the first 40 minutes after mating (right half in c). The uniparental inheritance of ptDNA in young C, reinhardtii zygotes can be explained in terms of the active digestion hypothesis (Kuroiwa 1985, / mt : rnt' / S ig na l c e ll nucl eus 1991; see text). mt" cel l n uc leus gametes can protect N N I" their ptDNA against calcium -de pendent nucJease (nuclease Cl during garnetogenesis by changing the chloro plast matrix or ptDNA binding proreins surrounding mt" ptDNA. Irnmediately after mating, a signal mu st activate several genes in rhe cell nucleus of mt" origin, and specific mRNAs from these genes are synthesized in the newly formed zygote. Proteins encoded by these mRNAs are synthesized de novo in the cytoplasm and may be involved in such processes as the preferential digestion of ptDNA or rhe formation of a cell wall. Some proteins that act as inducers directly or indirectly activate nuclease C. Nuc1ease C preferentially digests ptDNA in the chloroplast of mt: origin . Because ptDNA of mt" origin is not affected and is transmitted to the progeny, uniparental inheritance OCCUts. mt: = mating type minus; mt" = mating type plus; N ;;; cell nuclei; p ;;; plastid nuclei; C ;;; chloroplast, F ;;; flagella. Bar ;;; 1 um , . a ~ d ganelle n uclei (Figure 4). Sager (1954) identified non-Mendelian inheritance of organelJar genomes in crosses of streptomycinresistant mutanrs of C. reinhardtii. Sager and Lane (1972) showed that the major ptDNA from the plus mating type (mt+), but not the minus mating type (mr), parent was missing in 24-hour-old zygotes that had been formed in crosses in which the DNA of only one patent was labeled with 15N . To explain the mechanism of the preferential digestion of mt: 831 Mate r nal i n h e ri t a n c e Bi p a r e nt a l i nh er itanc e 1<C:~ . @ . @)~o I co=~ @) I \ ::J T r ice l lular p o ll e n . grai n .. ..·. (f· ' p o ll e n g r a in \ o '0 G e r m i n a t i o n of . CJ3 ~ . v.' - _.... :0 .. 2 n d p o ll e n g rai n .,., .,0 m i tos i s - ~..": ... . . eH ! .. .. ~ .. ':()~ ~ B i c e ll u l a r p o lle n g ra i n M igra ti o n of g e ne r a t i ve c e E m b r yo g en e s i s 1st po l le n grain I I I mit o s is \ \{5lO\ \Q@7 (c)IQJ \W M i r a tl il i s t y p e ptDNA, Sager and her colleagues proposed a model analogous to bacterial restriction-modification systerns (Sager and Ramanis 1973). AIthough extensive methylation oi mt: 832 Figure 5. Fluoreseenee photomicrographs of a vegetative nucleus, generative nuclei, plastid nuclei (small arrow), and mitoehondrial nuclei (large arrow) in pollen grains of two angiosperms, Lycoris radiata (a, b) and Rhododendron indicum (c) visualized by staining with DAPI, and a schematic representation (d) of the cell mechanisms of maternal inheritance aud biparental inheritance of organelle DNA in angiosperms, based on whether or nor organelle DNAs are present. Maternal inheritanee of plastids and mitochondria of the Mirabilis and Lycoris type may oceur in four steps: a reducrion in the number of organelles just after the first pollen mitosis; the preferential digestion of organelle nuclei during the formation of sperm cells (three horizontal arrows and a single vertieal arrow in [cl)); the digestion of organelles that do not contain DNA during fertilization (a, b}; and the amplification of organelle DNAs du ring oogenesis, Biparental inheritance of organelles of the Pelargonium and Rhododendron type may be the result of the protection of organelle DNA from nucleases during formation of sperm cells, and consequently, of organelle DNA remaining in the cytoplasrn in generative (c) and sperm cells. Patterns of normal green, stripcd, and white leaves in biparental plants may be reflected by the division and separation of organelles from rhe two parents during embryogenesis, G = generative nucleus; V = vegetative nucleus; srnall arrows = plastid nuclei; large arrows -= mitochondrial nuclei; EN -= egg nucleus; EPN = egg plastid nucleus; EMN = egg rnitochondrial nucleus, Bar (a) = 10 um; bars (h, c) = 0.1 um. Po llen t e tr ad d ptDNA occurred by seven hours after mating (Sager et a1. 1984), other groups questioned the significance of this methylation because the ptDNAs of both mating types were heavily methylated in a mutant (me-l) that exhibited typical uniparental transmission of mt" ptDNA (Bolen et al, 1982). Moreover, addition of rnethylation inhibitors, which prevent methylation of the ptDNA of the mt: parenr, had 00 effect on the normal pattern of transmission of ptDNA by the mt" parent (Feng and Chiang 1984). By 1982, we established a method for detecting small DNA molecules (approximately 1 kb) in organelles in vive using high-resolution fluorescence microscopy. We used this method to analyze organelle genome inheritance in C. reinhardtii (Kuroiwaetal.1982}andfoundthatwithin 40 rninutes after mating, the plastid nuclei (nucleoid; complex of pro- BioScience Val. 46 No. 11 teins and ptDNAs) from rhe mt: parenr was completely digesced, whereas plastid nuclei from the rnt" parcnt remained intact (Figure 4ac). Similar observations were repeated by other groups (Coleman and Maguire 1983, Munaut et al. 1990). Preferential digestion of plastid nuclei due to the digestion of ptDNAs is completely synchronized among the zygotes, although its timing depends on the culture age, strain, and medium. Ir evidendy occurs before the fusion of both cell nuclei and chloroplasts. We concluded that preferential digestion of ptDNAs in plastid nuclei from the mt: parent is the cellular mechanism responsible for uni parental inheritance in isogamous algae, such as C. reinbardtii, Dictyosphaeria cavernosa, and Acetabularia caJycuJus (Kuroiwa 1991, Kuroiwa er a1. 1982). i What physiological events precede rhe prefererrtiai digesricn of ptDNA after mating? Based on experiments using inhibitors of RNA or protein synthesis, DNase inhibitors, and UV irradiation, Kuroiwa (1985) proposed an active digestion model as a mechanism for the uniparental inheritance of ptDNA in C. reinhardtii (Figure 4d). According (0 this model, specific mRNAs are synchesized in the esr" cell nudeus in young zygotes in response to a mating signal. Proteins encoded by these mRNA(s) then activate calcium-dependent nuclease C, which preferenrially digests ptDNA of mr origin (Kuroiwa 1985, 1991), leading to uniparental inheritance. Ulrraviolet (UV) irradiation experiments suggest that the RNAs essential for preferential digestion of ptDNA from the mt: parent are synthesized de novo within ten minutes after maring, and that the corresponding gene might be linked to the mt+ genome. Possible straregies to analyze the preferential digestion of ptDNA include isolating and characterizing mutants that affecr the process, and screening for proteins or mRNAs whose accumulation correlates with preferential digestion of ptDNA. Gillham et a1. (1991) isolated the mat-3 mutant, which shows gready increased transmission ofchloroplast genes from the mt- parent. However, mutants have not been obtained in which preferendal digestion of December 1996 ptDNA from the zer parent is inhibited completely. Two-dimensional electrophoresis analysis has shown that in zygotes incubated with (35S}-methonine after ma ti ng , approximately 200 polypeptides are synthesized de novo. At least 7 of them-94 kD («), 94 kD (ß), 94 kD (y), 52 kD, 50 kD, 38 kD, and 20 kD-are correlated with uniparental transmission of the mtr chloroplast genome (Figure 4d; Nakamura et al. 1988. Uchida et al. 1993). When mt" ceIls were cultured in the presence of an inhibitor of DNA synthesis, 5-fluorodeoxyuridine (5-FdUrd), to reduce the presence of the ptDNA and mared with unrreated mr cells , rhese seven polypeptides were detected in the zygotes, most of which showed preferential digesrion of ptDNAs (Nakamura and Kuroiwa 1989). Wurtz et a1. (1977) reported that in mt" gametes derived from 5-FdUrd treated cells, biparental transmissten of chloroplast genes increased up to 20%30%. If 5-FdUrd affeets the eell nuclear genome, gene expression(s) essential for preferential digestion of ptDNAs from the mt" parent would be inhibited and exceptional zygotes would increase. We performed differential screening between mRNAs from gametes and cells ten minutes after mixing rhe two types of gametes and obtained cDNA clones corresponding to a zygote-specific gene family. The zygote-specific genes may be releted to the preferential desrruction of ptDNA, the fusion of cell nuclei, and formation of a cell wall (Figure 4d). Two clones, pZS102-1 and pZS102-69, conrain highly similar open reading frames (ORFs) and were judged to be cDNAs for two members (zyslA and zys1B,respectively) of a novel gene family (Uchida et a1. 1993). The predieted polypeptides encoded by these genes are small (20 kD) and contain cysreineand glutamine-rieh regions (Pigure 4d) and are unlikely to be identical to any of the seven polypepides related to preferential digestion of ptDNA INakamura et a1. 1988). Recent analysis by another group (Armbrust et al. 1993) suggests that a protein encoded by a zygote-specific dass III gene, ezy-l, which is linked to a mating locus-forming gene cluster (Ferris and Goodenough 1987), may be identical to polypeptide 4 (52 kD) found by Nakamura et a1. (1988). Based on the time course of protein detection after mating and the effecr of UV on the accumulation of this prorein, both the zyslA gene and the ezy-l gene seem to be correlated with the preferential destruction of ptDNA of mt: origin. Because the two corresponding peptides, ZYS-1A and ZYS1B, did not show nuclease activity, they may playa role as inducers or promoters of calcium-dependent nuelease C (Figure 4d). PtDNA in permeabilized mtr cells exhibited increasing resistance to the nuclease C fraction as cultures progressed, whereas those in mr: cells remained sensitive to nuclease C. This finding suggests that an unknown mechanism that proteers mt' -derived ptDNA from nuclease C exists in the chloroplast membrane, in the chloroplast matrix, OI in ptDNA bindingproteins surroundingptDNA (Kuroiwa 1985). Beeause nuclease C was detected in zygotes and in vegetative and gametie cells of the (WO mating types (Kuroiwa 1985,1991), the enzyme must exist in an inactive form in the cytoplasm or lysosome of such cells until it is activated by the mating-induced polypeptides. VanWinkele-Swift and Salinger (1988) reported the isolation of a mutant (mtJ-I) that seems ro fail (0 protect its own ptDNA frorn destruction. This mutant may define a gene (hat is necessary to keep the enzyme inactive until it is needed. Cytoplasmic inheritance in algae and land plants Gillham (1994) has extensively reviewed the transmission of mtDNA in slime molds, ciliates, filamenrous fungi, and animals, and the transmission of mtDNA and ptDNA in green algae, ferns, and lugher plants. In this article, we focus on cytological studies of maternal inheritance of organelle DNA in green algae and land plants, which are anisogamous or oogamous, in which the male contributes litde to the zygote cytoplasm. Maternal inherirance in these organisms has been postulated to occur by simple physical exclusion of mitochondria and plastids of male 833 origin by cytokinesis or fertilization (Mogensen 1988, Sears 1980). However, we found that anisogamous algae, such as Bryopsis maxima and Bryopsis pulumosa, and oogarnous organisms, such as Nitella axiliformis and Pteris uittata, show a phenornenon similar to the preferential digestion of mtDNA and ptDNA frorn one parent (Kuroiwa 1991). In contrast to the isogamous organisms, the preferential digestion of mtDNA and ptDNA occurred before fertilization in the anisogamous algae and oogamous organisms (Figures 1-IV, V, and 5). Correns (1909) and Baur (1909) discovered non-Mendelian inheritance of plastid phenotype in the higher plants Mirabillis ialapa and Pelargonium zonale, respectively. Interestingly, their findings corresponded to two typical patterns of plastid genes; rhat is, maternal and biparental transmission without Mendelian ratios. We have carried out eytogenetie studies of the pattern of transmission of ptDNAs in sperm cells and compared these results with those of previous genetic studies. We found two basic types of organelle DNA behavior in generative arid sperm cells of pollen grains (Miyamura er al. 1987). The first type of behavior, exemplified by M. jalapa, Lycoris radiata (Figure 5a, b), and Nicotiana tabacum, is characterized by the digestion of mtDNA and ptDNA in the sperm cells of pollen grains (Figure 5a, h, d). The second type of behavior, typified by P. zonale, Oenothera biennis, and Rhododendron indicum (Figure Sc), is characterized by the presence of mtDNA and ptDNA in sperm cells in pollen tubes (Figure Se, d). Chloroplast genes in M. jalapa and P. zonale show typical maternal transmission and biparental transmission, respectively, in genetic crosses (Sager 1972). The cytological observations thus agree with ehe classieal genetic data. A similar trend was confirmed in more than 100 angiosperm genera (Corriveau and Coleman 1988). These cytological results indicate that the preferential digestion of organelle DNA during sperm cell formation must be responsible for maternal inheritance in higher plants as weil as in anisogamous and oogamous algae and ferns (Figure I-IV, V; 834 Kuroiwa 1991). How does the preferential digestion of organelle DNA in the generative cells oecur in higher plants? We have observed the behavior of organelle DNA during the first pollen mitosis in many speeies. In general, the ratio of the volume of cytoplasm to that of the eell nuclei appears to be related to the preferential digesrion of organelle DNA. In plants such as the Geraniaceae, wh ich have a relatively large cytoplasm compared to the nucleus, the preferential destruction of organelle DNA does not occur, and organelle DNA remains in generative eells (Figure 5d). By contrast, the preferential destruction of organelle DNA oceurs in planrs sueh as the Compositae, whieh h ave a r e lat ive l y small cytoplasmmuc'aces-r-io. The preferential destruction of organelle DNA is also found in some plants with a large volume of cytoplasm in the generative cell, such as the Liliaceae. Accordingly, a decrease in the volume of the generative cell by unequal cell division, or pollen mitosis, is not directly responsible for the destruction of mtDNA and prDNA (Figure 5d). Nucleases are not activated in plants such as P. zonale and Schlumbergera russellianum that show biparental transmission of ptDNA. The low frequency of biparental plastid inheritance that has been documented in both Nieotiana and Petunia may be due ro a malfunction in the system for inducing ptDNA digestion during pollen by a calcium-dependent nuclease C; degradation of organelles, possibly by lysosomes, after digestion of organelle DNAs is complete; and a huge amplification of organelle DNA in egg cells during oogenesis. Uniparental inheritance also inhibits the recombination of organelle genes in ehe zygote. Thus, although fertilization allows the recombination of nuclear genomes, events before or during fertilization prevent the recombination of organelle DNA from the two parents. Why are organelle genomes transmitted uniparentally? Cosmides and Tooby (1981) suggested that uniparental transmission is the result of "intragenomic conflict" between organelle genomes of maternal and patemal origin. We suggest an alternative explanation. We believe that the nuclear genorne of the host eeIl must have undergone three steps to control the independence of protoorganelles following endosymbiosis: transfer of more than 70% of the symbiont genome into the host's ceIl nucleus, regulation of proroorganelle division by ring-forming cytoskeletal protein(s), such as actin, that are eneoded by the nuclear genome; and uni parental transmission of organelle genomes to prog~ eny to avoid the evolution of organelles through reeombination of the organelle genes of borh parents. Thus, the evolution of protoorganelles was effeetively terminated, and they were eonverted into mitochondria and plastids. formation. Note that a huge amplification of organelle DNA occurs during 00genesis in P. zonale, which accompanies an increase in the egg cell volume (Kuroiwa and Kuroiwa 1992). This phenomenon complements processes such as unequal division of first pollen mitosis and preferential digestion of organelle DNA in generative cells to yield a complete uniparental inheritance of organelle genomes. We hypothesize that elimination of organelle DNA from sperm or sperm cells before and during fertilization in anisogamous algae, ferns, and angiosperms involves four steps: unequal cell division in the generative cell, which decreases organelle number; digestion of organelle DNA, presumably Acknowledgments This research was supported by a grant-aid for special promoted research (No. 06101002) from the ]apanese Ministry ofEducation, Seience and Culture. References cited Armbrust EV, Ferris PJ. Goodenough UW. 1993. A mating type-linked gene cluster expressed in Chlamydomonas zygotes parricipares in the uniparental inherirance of the chloroplasr genome. Ce1l74: 801-811. BaueE. 1909. Das Wesen und die Erblichkeitsverhaltnisse der "Varierares albomarginatae hort" von Pelargonium zonale. Zeitschrift fuer Versuchstierkunde 1: 330-351. Bi E, Lutkenhaus J. 1991. FtsZ ring srructure associared with division in Escherichia coli. Nature 354: 161-164. Birky CW jr. 1983. Relaxed cellular conrrols BioScience Val. 46 No. 11 and organelle heredity. Science 222: 468475. Bolen PL, Grant OM, Swincon D, Boynton JE, Gillham NW. 1982. Extensive methylation ofchlocoplastDNA by a nuclear gene mutation dces not affect chloroplast gene transmission in Chlamydomonas. Ce1l28: 335343. Coleman AW, Maguire MJ. 1983. Cytological derecrion of the basis of uniparental inhentance of plastid DNA in Chlamydomonas moewusii. Currenr Genetics 7: 211-218. Cerrens C. 1909. Vererbungsversuche mit blass (gelb) grunen und bluntblattrigen Sippen bei Mirabilis ialapa, Urtica pilulifera, und Lunariaannua .Zeitschrift Euer Vererbungslehre 1:291-329. Corriveau jS, Coleman AW. 1988. Rapid screening rnethod ro detecr potential biparental inheritance of plasrid DNA and results for over 200angiospermspecies. AmericanJournal of Botany 75: 1443-1458. Cosmides LM, Tooby J. 1981. Cyroplasmic inheritance and inrragenomic conflicr.journal of Theoretical Biology 89: 89-129. De Luca P, Taddei R, Verano 1. 1978. "Cyanidioschyzon merolae"': a new alga of thermal acidic environmenrs. Webbia 33: 37--44. Ducken JG, Ligrone R. 1993. Plastid-dividing rings in ferns. Annals of Botany (London) 72:619-627. Feng TW, Chiang KS. 1984. The persistence of mate mal inheritance in Ch/amydomonas despite hypcmethylatlon of chloroplast DNA induced by inhibirors. Proceedings of rhe National Academy of Seiences of ehe United States of America 81: 3438-3442. Ferris PJ, Googenough UW. 1987. Transcription of novelgenes, inducing a gene linked to the mating-rype locus, induced by Chlamydomonas fertilization. Molecular and Cellular Biology 7: 2360-2366. Giese AC. 1979. Cell physiology. Philadelphia (PA): W. B. Saunders. Gillham NW. 1994. Organelle genes and genomes. OxEord (UK): Oxford University Press. Gillham NW, Boymon JE, Harris EH. 1991. Transmission of plastid genes. Pages 55-92 in Bogorad L, Vasil IV, eds. The molecular biology of plastids. San Diego (CA): Academic Press. Gray MW. 1992. Theendosymbionthypothesis revisited. Imernational Review of Cytology 141:233-357. Kawano 5, Takano H, Kuroiwa T. 1995. Sexuality of mitochondria: fusion, recombination and plasmids. International Review of Cytology 161: 49-110. Kuroiwa H, Kuroiwa T. 1992. Giant mitochondria in the marure egg cell of Pelargonium zonale. Protoplasma 168: 184-188, Kuroiwa H, Ohta T, f<uroiwa T. 1996. Srudies on the development and three-dimensional reconstruetion of giant mitochondria and their nuelei in egg cells ofp elargonium zonale Ait. Protoplasma 196: 235-244. Kuroiwa T. 1982. Mitochondrial nudei. International Review of Cytology 75: 1-59. ___. 1985. Mechanisms oE maternal inheritance of chloroplast DNA: an active digestion hypothesis. Microbiologkal Sciences 2: 267-272. ___.1991. The replication, differentiation, December 1996 and inheritance of plastid with emphasis on the concept of organelle nuclei. International Review of Cytology 128: 1--62. Kuroiwa T, Kuroiwa H. 1980. Inhibition of Physarum mitochondrial divisionbycytcchalasin B. Experientia 36: 193-194. Kuroiwa T, Kawano S, Nishibayashi S, Saro C. 1982. Epifluorescent microscopic evidence for matemal inheritance of chloroplasr DNA. Nature 298: 481-483. Kuroiwa T, Suzuki K, Kuroiwa H. 1993. Mitochondrial division by dividing apparatus (an electron dense ring) in Cyanidioshyzon merolae. Protoplasma 175: 173-177. Kuroiwa T, Ohta T, Kuroiwa H, Kawano S. 1994. Molecular andcellular rnechanisms of mitochondrial nuclear division and mitochondriokinesis. Microscopy Research and Techniqce 27: 220-232. Kuroiwa T, Suzuki K, and Kuroiwa H. 1995. Mirochondria dividing ring: ultrastrucrural basis for rhe mechanisms of mirochondrial division in Cyanidioschyzon merolae. Protoplasma 156: 12-23. Lima-de-Faria A. 1983. Molecular evolution and crganizarion of the chromosome. Amsterdam (rhe NetherIands): Elsevier. Lutkenhaus J. 1993. FtsZ ring in bacterial cytokinesis. Molecular Microbiology 9: 403409. Margulis 1. 1970. Origin of eukaryotic cells. New Haven (CT): Yale Universiry Press. Mita T, Kanbe T, Tanaka K, Kuroiwa T. 1986. Aringstructure around the dividing plane of t h e Cyanidium caldarium chloroplast. Protoplasma 130:211-213. Miyamura S, Kuroiwa T, Nagata T. 1987. Disappearance of plastid and mitochondrial nucleoids during rhe formation of generative cells of higher plants revealed by fluorescence microscopy. Protoplasma 141: 149159. Mogensen HL. 1988. Exclusion of male mitochondria and plastids during syngamy in barley as a basis for maternal inheritance. Proceedings of rhe National Academy of Sciences oE the United States of Arnerica 85: 2594-2597. MunautC, DombrowigzD,Matagne RF. 1990. Detection of chloroplast D NA by using fluorescent monodonal anti-bromodeoxyuridine antibody and analysis oE its fate during zygote formation in Chlamydomonas reinhardtii. Current Genetics 18: 259-263. Nakamura S, Kuroiwa T. 1989, Selective elimination of chloroplast DNA by5-fluorodeoxyuridine causing no effect on preferential digestion of male chloroplast nucleoids in Chlamydomonas. European Journal of Cell Biology 48: 165-173. Nakamura 5, Sato C, Kuroiwa T. 1988. Polypeptides related to preferential digestion oE male chloroplast nucleoids in Chlamydomonas. PlantScience56: 129-136. Ohta N, Kawano S, Kuroiwa T. 1994. Physical map of the plastid genome of unicellular red alga Cyanidium caldarium strain RK-1. Current Genetics 26: 136-138. Osteryoung KW, Vierling E. 1995. Conserved cell and organelle division. Nature 376: 473474. Palmer JD. 1992. Chloroplasr and mitochondrial genome evolution in land plants. Pages 99-133 in Herrmann RG, ed. Plant gene research: cell organelles. Vienna (Austria): Springer-Verlag. Reich M, Munholland J. 1993. A high-resolunon map of rhe chloroplast genome of ehe red alga Porphyra purpurea. Plant Cell 5: 465-475. Russel SO. 1984. Ulrrasrructure of the sperm of Plumbago zeylanica, 2. Quantitative cyrology and three-dimensional reconstruction. Planra 162: 385-391. Sager R. 1954. Mendelian and non-Mendelian inheritance of srreptomycin resistance in Chlamydomonas reinhardtü. Proceedings of the National Academy of Seiences of the United Stares of America 40: 356-363. ___.1972. Cytoplasmic genes and organelles. New York: Academic Press. Sager R, Lane D. 1972. Molecular basis of maremal inheritance. Proceedings of rhe National Academy of Science of the United Srates of America 69: 2410-2413. Seger R, Ramanis Z. 1973. The mechanism of maternal inheritance in Chlamydomonas: biochemical andgenetic studies. Theoretical and Applied Generies 43: 101-108. Sager R, Sano H, Grabowy CT. 1984. Control of maremal inheritance by DNA metlrylation in Chlamydomonas. Current Topics in Microbiology and Immunology 108: 157172. Sears BB. 1980. Elimination of plastids during spermatogenesie and fertilization in the plant kingdem. Plasmid4: 233-255. Seckbach J. 1991. Systemarie problems wirh Cyanidium caladrium and Galdieria sulphuraria and rheir implications for molecular biology stndies. Journal of Phycology 27: 794-796. Smith SE. 1988. Biparental inheritance of organelles and its implications in crap improvemem. Plant Breeding Reviews 6: 361393. Sodmergen GH, ehen ZM, Hu ZM, Guo FL, Guan XL. 1995. Male gametophyte developmeßt inPlumbago zeylanica:cytoplasm localization and cell detennination in the early generative celL Protoplasma 186: 79-86. Suzuki K, Ehara T, Osafune H, Kawano S, Kuroiwa T. 1994. Behavior of mitochondria, chloroplast and their nuclei during the mitotic eyde in the ultramicro alga Cyanidioschyzon mero/ae. European Jour· nal of Cell Biology 63: 280-288. Takahashi H, Takano H, Yokoyama A, Hara Y, Kawano S, Toh-e A, Kuroiwa T. 1995. Isolation, characterization and chromosomal mapping of an actin gene from the primitive red aiga Cyanidioschyzon merolae. Current Genetks 28: 484-490. Uchida H, Kawano S, Sato H, Kuroiwa T. 1993. Isolation and characterization of novel genes which are expressed during the very early stage of zygote formation in Chlamydomonas reinhardtü. Current Genetics 24: 290-300. VanWinkle-Swift KP, Salinger AP. 1988. Loss of mt' derived zygotic chloroplast DNA is associated with alethal allele in Chlamydomonas monoica. Current Genetks 13: 331-337. Wurtz EA, Boynton JE, Gillham NW. 1977. Perturbation of chloroplast DNA amounts and chloroplasr gene transmission in ChJamydomonas by 5-fluorodeoxyuridine. Proceedings oE the National Academy of Sciences of the United Srates of America 74: 4552-4556. 835