* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download Transient light-induced changes in ion channel
SNARE (protein) wikipedia , lookup
Cell encapsulation wikipedia , lookup
Cytokinesis wikipedia , lookup
Organ-on-a-chip wikipedia , lookup
Signal transduction wikipedia , lookup
Mechanosensitive channels wikipedia , lookup
Action potential wikipedia , lookup
List of types of proteins wikipedia , lookup
Cell membrane wikipedia , lookup
Journal of Experimental Botany, Vol. 48, No. 314, pp. 1623-1630, September 1997 Journal of Experimental Botany Transient light-induced changes in ion channel and proton pump activities in the plasma membrane of tobacco mesophyll protoplasts Margaretha Blom-Zandstra1, Hans Koot, Joke van Hattum and Sake A. Vogelzang DLO-Research Institute for Agrobiology and Soil Fertility (AB-DLO), PO Box 14, 6700 AA Wageningen, The Netherlands Received 20 November 1996; Accepted 14 May 1997 Abstract Rapid, transient changes of the membrane potential upon light transitions are generally observed in microelectrode studies. In a patch-clamp study similar responses to light transitions were found in current clamp. Corresponding with the changes of membrane potential, light-induced current changes in voltage clamp were observed. This paper evaluates the involvement of outward rectifying conductances and plasma membrane bound H'-ATPases (proton pump) to these light responses in mesophyll protoplasts of Nicotiana tabacum L. The contribution of K + -channels to these responses, could be minimized by variation of the holding potential or addition of the K + -channel blocker verapamil. It was concluded that light transitions modulate both proton pump and K + -channel activity. Effects of light on membrane current were not observed in root cells and chlorophyll-deficient cells, suggesting that the response requires photosynthetic activity. However, blockers of photosystems I and II did not affect current changes. Key words: Light, tobacco, whole cell. patch-clamp, plasma membrane, Introduction Under dark conditions, ion transport in plants strongly differs from that in light. Thus a transition from light to dark (LD) and dark to light (DL) has a significant effect on the dynamics of ion transport processes both on a whole plant and a cellular level. The nature of the initial response to light transitions is likely to provide important information about the factors that are involved in changes of ion transport. Changes of the free running membrane potential (E^ of photosynthetic plant cells upon light transitions, have been reported since studies with microelectrodes were started (reviewed by Jeschke, 1976; Findlay and Hope, 1976). At least two types of responses upon DL transitions have been identified, differing in time-scale and direction: a rapid, transient depolarization of 10-50 ms (Bulychev et al., 1972; Vredenberg, 1974) and a slow hyperpolarization of 5-20 min (Spanswick, 1972, 1974). Transition to dark causes similar responses in the opposite direction. Spalding and Cosgrove (1992) showed, with microelectrode measurements, that lightinduced, transient depolarizations of the plasma membrane result from inactivation of the plasma membranebound H+-ATPase (proton pump). Apart from an effect on pump activity, light also affects voltage-gated channel activity: Single channel data from patch-clamp studies (Spalding et al., 1992) indicated that the activity of plasma membrane-bound K+-channels increased upon DL transitions. A patch-clamp study is presented here in which transient responses of the plasma membrane upon LD and DL transitions are shown in isolated mesophyll protoplasts from tobacco leaves. Tobacco protoplasts were used because ion selectivity, kinetics and pharmacology of the 1 To whom correspondence should be addressed. Fax: +31 317 423 110. E-mail: m.blom-zandstraeab.dlo.nl. Abbreviations: BTP, 1,3-bis[tris{hydroxyrnethyl)-rnethylamino]propane; CC, current clamp; DL, dark to light; Ea, chloride equilibrium potential; £H, proton equilibrium potential; EK, potassium equilibrium potential; gm, membrane conductance; gK/wc. potassium conductance; la, chloride current; /H, proton current; IKOK:, potassium outward rectifying current; lm, membrane current; I/V current-voltage; IRC, inward rectifying current; K4BAPTA, potassium-1,2-bis(2-aminophenoxy)ethane-N,rV,N',A/l-tetra-acetic-acid; LD, light to dark; ORC, outward rectifying current; VC, voltage clamp; Vm, membrane potential; Vr>onc, reversal potential of the potassium outward rectifying currents; WC, whole cell. © Oxford University Press 1997 1624 Blom-Zandstra et al. plasma membrane K + -channels have been thoroughly characterized (Van Duijn, 1993; Van Duijn et al., 1993; Thomine et al., 1994). So far, changes in pump and channel activities upon light transitions have been studied separately. In this study, the involvement of both K + -channels and proton fluxes in the transient light responses in the same cell was evaluated. Patch-clamp experiments in a whole cell (WC) configuration, provide the opportunity to study light responses in different ways: In current clamp (CC) the effect of light on £ m can be studied while in voltage clamp (VC) both membrane current (7m) and conductance (gm) can be measured simultaneously. Moreover, the contribution of K + -channels to / m upon light transitions can be minimized (1) by clamping the membrane potential (Km) at a potential where these channels are deactivated or (2) by clamping Vm at the reversal potential (VT) of these channels. In both situations the potassium current (/K.ORC) is zero although the potassium conductance (£K.ORC) m a v not be zero at Vz. The involvement of the K + -channel is also evaluated by the addition of verapamil, effective as a blocker of K +-selective channels in tobacco protoplasts (Thomine et al., 1994). Addition of verapamil strongly reduces the contribution of K + -channels to 7m andg m , independent of Vm. Materials and methods Plant material Seeds of Nicotiana tabacum L., cv. rustica America, were sown in Perlite and kept at 20 °C for 2 weeks. Further growth occurred in a growth chamber at the same temperature, RH = 70% and a photoperiod of 12 h (150 ^mol cm" 2 s" 1 ). Onemonth-old seedlings were transferred to a hydroponic system based on a Steiner solution (1968). Control experiments were performed with sweet pepper, ArabidopsLs, couch grass, and Alstroemeria. The growth conditions of sweet pepper {Capsicum annuum L.) were the same as those for tobacco. Arabidopsis thaliana L. was kindly donated by the Department of Genetics from the Wageningen Agricultural University. The growth conditions are described by Koorneef et al. (1991). Couch grass (Elytrigia repens L.) was grown as described by De Ruiter et al. (1990). Cut flower stalks of alstroemeria (Alstroemeria pelegrina L. cv. Westland) were obtained from a commercial nursery at a developmental stage as described in detail by Jordi et al. (1993). 0.009 ^ M ) adjusted with mannitol to an osmolarity of 485 mOsmol kg" 1 . Asymmetrical bath solution: 10 mM MES-TRIS (pH 5.5), 10 mM K G (concentration depended on the desired equilibrium potential), 2 mM MgCl2, 2 mM CaCl 2 , adjusted with mannitol to an osmolarity of 510 mOsmolkg" 1 . Symmetrical bath solution: 10 mM MES-TRIS (pH 7.2), 150 mM KC1 (equal to the K + -concentration of the pipette solution, resulting in an equilibrium potential for potassium of nearly 0 mV), 2 mM MgCl2, 2 mM CaCl 2 , adjusted with mannitol to an osmolarity of 510 mOsmol kg" 1 . Patch-clamp experiments Electrodes were prepared from borosilicate glass (GC150-15, Clark Electromedical Instruments, Reading, UK.). Pipettes were made with a two-stage puller (List-medical 3P-A, Darmstadt, Germany), fire-polished (Zeiss 1D03 and List-medical CP-Z10I) and coated with Sylgard (Dow-Corning, Midland, MI). The pipette resistance ranged from 5-10 M£>, depending on the geometry and experimental solutions. Dishes with protoplasts were mounted in an inverted microscope (Nikon-TMD). A piezo manipulator (Luigs and Neumann GmbH, Ratingen, Germany) was used to move the pipettes in the micrometre range. Conventional patch-clamp techniques were applied according to Hamill et al. (1981) in whole-cell (WC) configurations, performed by suction and monitored by an Axopatch 200 patch-clamp amplifier (Axon Instruments, USA). The sealing process was monitored on a digital storage oscilloscope (Hewlett Packard 54501A 100 MHz). Voltage and current data were transferred via a CED1401 A/D-converter which was controlled by CED patchclamp software (Cambridge, UK). Data were sampled at 2-10kHz and analysed using (Turbo-Pascal) CED compatible software (ECOPATCH, Vogelzang and Prins, 1992). Light and dark responses of plasma membranes were measured by switching the light source (Philips 12 V, 100 W) of the microscope (Nikon-TMD) on and off. Photon flux density was about 100 ^mol m " 2 s" 1 . Photochemical reaction of electrodes to light Photochemical currents of the Ag/AgCl electrodes in both pipette and bath solution upon light induction were measured after transfer of the pipette into the bath medium. At high light intensity (3800fimol m~ 2 s" 1 ) current changes (/, in pA) could be described by single exponential curves (/= Imnx (1 — exp(— t/r)) with TbghI on = 5-10s and Tbght ofr=8—15 s) and occurred in the opposite direction compared with responses of green cells. The contribution of the photochemical currents to shifts in electrochemical potential was small (<;4 mV). During experiments with protoplasts electrodes were minimally exposed to light (less than lOO^jnol m" 2 s" 1 ). Protoplast isolation Protoplasts (diameter: 25 ± 7 (im) were isolated without osmotic shock and centrifugation steps, as described by Blom-Zandstra et al. (1995). The following solutions were used: wash medium. 10 mM MES-KOH (pH 5.5), 10 mM sucrose, 500 mM mannitol, 2 m M MgCl 2 , 2 m M CaCl 2 . Enzyme medium: l%cellulase (R10 Onozuka), 0.2% macerozyme (R10 Onozuka) in wash medium. Pipette solution: 1 mM HEPES-BTP (pH 7.2), 150 mM KC1 (concentration depended on the desired equilibrium potential), 2 mM MgCI 2 , 5 mM MgATP, 2 mM K 4 BAPTA, 0.1 mM CaCl 2 (calculated free Ca-concentration: Addition of blockers or elicitors When indicated in the text, the following chemicals were added to the bath solution: 10/u.M verapamil, 0.1 mM paraquat, 0.02 mM or 1 mM NaCN, 10 pM fusicoccin (kindly supplied by Dr AH de Boer, University of Amsterdam, the Netherlands). The chemicals were stored in methanol. The final concentration of methanol in the bath solution was 0.1%. Addition of 0.1% methanol to the bath solution did not affect channel activity or light responses. When indicated, 5 ^M DCMU was added to the pipette interior. Light modulates channel and pump Results Electrogenic characteristics of isolated mesophyll protoplasts from tobacco leaves Mesophyll protoplasts were isolated from tobacco leaves and used for patch-clamp measurements in the whole cell configuration. Figure 1 shows typical recordings of activation of outward K + -currents (ORCs) in the plasma membrane upon depolarizing pulse potentials ranging from —90 mV to 50 mV. Deactivation of the K + -currents can be seen in the tail currents upon stepping back to the holding potential (—140 mV). The equilibrium potential (EK) was —60 mV in this experiment. From the steadystate //K-relationship (see inset) and the tail currents it can be seen that the ORC activated at potentials close to and more positive than EK. At potentials more negative than EK, the ORC did not contribute to the steady-state membrane current (see inset). Changing £ K to 0 mV resulted in a shift of the activation potential proportional to the shift of EK (as shown for ORCs in Plcmtago media L. root cortex protoplasts, Vogelzang and Prins, 1995). The tail currents reversed at EK (i.e. —54 mV in Fig.l). This indicates that the ORC is selective for K + . In most experiments (n = 40) only ORCs could be detected. In four cases also inward rectifying currents (IRCs) were observed. The ORC currents activated with a sigmoidal time-course. Half-time values of these currents were voltage-dependent and decreased from 2 s to 0.2 s when pulse potentials increased from —50 mV to +50 mV. The single exponential deactivation currents were also voltage-dependent, but slower than the activation currents. 1625 Their half-time values varied from 0.8 s to 2.5 s for pulse potentials from —140 mV to 0 mV. Transient light responses In the WC configuration, LD and DL transitions were applied in both voltage clamp (VC) and current clamp (CC). Measurements in CC always showed that DL transitions induced rapid depolarization, while LD transitions caused hyperpolarization of the plasma membrane (Fig. 2). In VC, DL transitions always induced a transient rapid decrease in current, while LD transitions caused a transient increase in current (Fig. 3, upper panel). The steady-state 7/K-curves (measured > 5 m i n after light transitions) were similar in light and dark (data not shown). In addition, the activation and deactivation time constants did not differ between light and dark. Apparently, in WC measurements light transitions induced only transient changes (<5min) of both membrane current in VC and membrane potential in CC. While the transient responses to LD and DL transitions were reproducible, the long-term changes (> 1 min) were not. To evaluate the role of ion channels in the transient light responses further, the effect of LD and DL transitions on membrane conductance (#„,) was studied. Membrane conductances were determined in VC by application of small voltage pulses, which were repeated every second and were superimposed on the holding potential during the LD and DL transitions. To prevent activation or deactivation of the channels, these pulses were small (3-10 mV) and short (50-100 ms) compared to the activation and deactivation halftime values. An example of an applied pulse and the corresponding / pulK is shown in the inset of Fig. 3. The direction of the 300 E LU -80 Fig. 1. Whole cell recordings (upper panel) of a tobacco leaf mesophyll protoplast in asymmetrical solutions. Outward rectifying currents were activated upon depolarizing pipette potentials. Pulses (see lower panel) were applied ranging from —90 to 50 mV with 10 mV steps. Deactivation tail currents appeared when the voltage was returned to the holding potential of —140 mV. A leak subtraction of 4 GQ has been applied to all tracks. The inset displays the corresponding whole cell current voltage curve measured at the end of each applied pulse (9.5 s). -100 1 2 3 time (min) Fig. 2. Whole cell recordings in current clamp in asymmetrical solutions Light- ( • ) and dark- ( • ) induced changes of the free running membrane potential (£„,) of tobacco mesophyll protoplasts 1626 Blom-Zandstra et al. time (min) Fig. 3. Whole cell recordings in voltage clamp in asymmetrical solutions Light- ( • ) and dark- ( • ) induced current changes of the plasma membrane of tobacco mesophyll protoplasts (upper panel) and membrane conductance (lower panel). The holding potential was —50 mV. The membrane conductance was calculated (explanation: see text) from the change in membrane current upon application of —10 mV for a period of 0.1 s (inset). The values on the v-axis of the inset apply to both the current (pA) and voltage (mV). applied Vpu\K (upward or downward) did not affect the amplitude of Ipulx (data not shown). The current changes ( V I K ) w e r e usec * t o calculate gm by: 6m 'pulie/ ' pulte (Note: gm is denned as the sum of different conductances, i.e. (/) the voltage and time-independent, non-selective conductances usually described as the leak conductance, comprising the seal and membrane bilayer conductance; (II) the voltage and time-dependent ion channel conductances and pump conductances.) Light transitions caused transient changes of gm (Fig. 3, lower panel). These changes ofg m corresponded well to the light-induced changes of/ m (Fig. 3, upper panel). As no channels were activated or deactivated by Vpu\K (see above), changes in / m or gm could not result from Vpu\x. Therefore, variations of both 7m andg m (Fig. 3) were caused by changes in the light conditions only. the K + conductance (gK.oRc>0)> but the contribution of the ORCs to current changes is small. Apart from changes in channel activities, changes of the pump activity may also be involved in the light effect. To evaluate the involvement of the pump in light responses, conditions were created in which changes of 7K ORC will not contribute to changes of / m . This can be achieved by (I) changing the holding potential with respect to the activation and reversal potential of the ORC or by (II) changing the conditions of the bath and pipette solutions from asymmetrical to symmetrical. Changing the holding potential: In this experiment, protoplasts were selected without IRC activity and a holding potential of —120 mV (60 mV more negative than the reversal potential of the ORC (KrORc)) w a s applied. Thus, outward rectifying channels were fully inactivated and V.ORC = 0 pA (see inset Fig. 1). So, without IRC and ORC activity, potassium channels do not contribute to the current. At this holding potential, DL and LD transitions still resulted in changes of 7m (Fig. 4), whileg m was not significantly affected by the transitions. These current changes may result from changes in channel activities of Cl" and Ca2 + , or a passive proton conductance. Changes of proton pump activity may also be involved in the light effect. Changing bath and pipette solutions: To eliminate the effects of Cl~ and passive proton conductances to lightinduced changes of Im, the light-responses with symmetrical solutions were studied. Here, the equilibrium potentials of protons, free potassium and free chloride ions are close to zero (Ea = - 0 . 8 mV; EK = - 1 . 2 mV, £ H = ° mV). Consequently, at a holding potential of 0 mV, ar) AC.ORO ^ci d / H are zero. Therefore, potassium, chloride or passive proton conductances will not contribute to light-induced current changes at this potential. In VC, DL transitions still induced a transient rapid decrease in Changing the contribution of the ORC in the WC configuration Changes of Im and gm upon LD and DL transitions, as shown in Fig. 3, may result from changes in the activities of different channels, i.e. K + , Cl~, Ca 2+ or a passive H + conductance. Of these, the K + channel is the most dominant one. The holding potential (—50 mV) in this experiment was slightly positive to KrORC (—60 mV). At this potential, it is expected that the ORCs contribute to ~* '.—r time (min) Fig. 4. Whole cell recordings in voltage clamp in asymmetrical solutions. Light- (C) and dark- ( • ) induced current changes of the plasma membrane of tobacco mesophyll protoplasts (upper panel) and membrane conductance (lower panel). The holding potential was - 1 2 0 mV. Light modulates channel and pump Im, while LD transitions caused a transient increase in /m (Fig. 5). Concomitantly, DL and LD transitions also caused transient changes ofgm. The results agreed with the data measured in the asymmetrical solutions shown in Fig. 3. However, the amplitude of the changes in gm was smaller. In this experiment, a proton pump and a calcium channel are the only potential sources for current changes. From the experiments it was concluded that apart from channel activity the proton pump may substantially contribute to light-induced changes of the membrane current. Different channels that are hard to distinguish from each other may be responsible for the light-induced changes ofgm. The potassium ORC may be the most important source: when the ORC is inactivated (Fig. 4) changes of gm have faded. 1627 400 - -120 mV +Verapamil Evaluation of the involvement of the proton pump To verify the contribution of the proton pump to lightinduced current changes of the plasma membrane, the proton pump activity was strongly increased by the addition of fusicoccin (Marre, 1979), and the ORC and, if present, the calcium channels, were inactivated by the addition of 10 pM verapamil (Thomine et al., 1994). The inhibition of the ORC by addition of this chemical was very effective: as a result the steady-state outward rectifying currents were strongly blocked (Fig. 6). Similar to the experiment in which the ORC was inactivated (Fig. 4), addition of verapamil inhibited the effect of LD and DL transitions on changes ofgm (n = 5), while lightinduced current changes could still be detected (Fig. 7). Apparently, the proton pump contributes significantly to the light response, although a contribution of chloride fluxes cannot be excluded. Fig. 6. Whole cell recordings of a fusicoccin-treated tobacco leaf mesophyll protoplast in asymmetrical solutions before and after addition of verapamil. Outward rectifying currents were activated upon depolarizing pipette potentials. Pulses were applied ranging from —100 to 60 or 80 mV (as indicated in the figure) with 10 mV steps. Deactivation tail currents appeared when the voltage was returned to the holding potential of —120 mV. A leak subtraction of 5 GQ has been applied to all tracks. The inset displays the corresponding whole cell current voltage curves, measured at the end of each applied pulse (6 s), before (—) and after (+) addition of verapamil. 0 -4 -8 -12 0.6 0.4 Mvr^P 0.2 25 5 time (mm) 7.5 Fig. 7. Whole cell recordings in voltage clamp in asymmetrical solutions measured in the same protoplast as in Fig. 6 after blocking the outward rectifier by addition of 10^M verapamil. Light- (D) and dark- ( • ) induced current changes of the plasma membrane of tobacco mesophyll protoplasts (upper panel) and membrane conductance (lower panel). The holding potential was —60 mV. 2 4 time (min) Fig. 5. Whole cell recordings in symmetrical solutions in voltage clamp. Light- ( • ) and dark- ( • ) induced current changes of the plasma membrane of tobacco mesophyll protoplasts (upper panel) and membrane conductance (lower panel). The holding potential was 0 mV. Both voltage and current clamp measurements were performed in the same protoplast. Origin of the light response Similar light responses as described above were also detected in protoplasts from other plant species, e.g. Capsicum annuum L., Arabidopsis thaliana L., Elytrigia repens L., and Alstroemeriapelegrina L. (data not shown). These responses were only found in mesophyll cells. 1628 Blom-Zandstra et al. Protoplasts from root or cortex cells did not respond to light transitions, nor did protoplasts from chlorophylldeficient cells from a tissue-cultured tobacco plant. This strongly indicates that a light-sensitive-complex is involved in the response. To test the involvement of the light-harvesting complex (LHC) the effect of a photosynthetic inactive wavelength was examined. For this purpose, a filter (Vitatron, 5l5nm, bandwidth 5 nm) was placed between the light source and the bath, to obtain green light with a low light intensity (12^mol m~ 2 s" 1 ). However, current changes by DL and LD transitions still occurred (data not shown). While light responses depended on the presence of chlorophyll, addition of inhibitors of photosynthesis I and II (DCMU, paraquat, NaCN) did not alter the light response either. Discussion The starting point of this study was to evaluate the initial response of £ m of the plasma membrane to DL and LD transitions as shown in microelectrode studies (Bulychev etcil., 1972; Vredenberg, 1974; Jeschke, 1976). The patchclamp technique was used to study the light responses in the whole cell configuration. The plasma membrane of mesophyll protoplasts from tobacco leaves showed electrogenic characteristics (Fig. 1) similar to those described earlier (Van Duijn, 1993; Van Duijn et al., 1993; Thomine et al., 1994). A transient hyperpolarization or depolarization of the plasma membrane was observed in CC (Fig. 2) after DL and LD transitions, respectively, in addition to a clear decrease or increase of membrane current in VC (Fig. 3). These results agree very well with the microelectrode studies. Apparently, patch-clamp experiments in the WC configuration are a feasible approach for the investigation of transient light effects. To study the light responses, a novel method was used: at different values of Vm, light-induced changes of Im were separated from changes in gm by application of repetitive voltage pulses during DL and LD transitions. The results show that / m and gm were not always proportionally affected by light transitions. The effect of these transitions on changes of Im and gm was strongly influenced by the applied Km and by the activity of the ORC involved. This indicates that apart from channel activity, obeying Ohm's law, pump activity may also be involved. It is assumed that in the domain in which the experiments were performed, only the pump can behave in a voltageindependent manner as suggested by the model of Blatt (1991). Ion channels or other transporters show voltageindependency only at their extremes, beyond the voltagerange of these observations. To evaluate the involvement of pump and/or channel activity the experimental conditions were varied to change the contribution of the ORC to changes of Im. The results of these experiments presented in Figs 3-5 and Fig. 7 are summarized in Table I. For every experiment a set of potential sources for current changes upon light is suggested. When Vm was 10 mV more positive than Vr ORC, light transitions induced both changes of / m and gm (Fig. 3). As ORCs are activated at this potential (shown in Fig. 1) it was concluded that changes in gm by light transitions are caused by modulation of the ORC activity. So, changes of / m may also result from modulation of the ORC activity, although its contribution may be small as Vm is close to EK. Apart from the ORCs, other channels (Ca 2 + , Cl") may be involved. The proton pump and the passive proton conductances are also likely candidates. The latter have been described for different plant cell membranes (Althoff et al., 1989; Beilby et al., 1993) and may be involved in the cells also because the equilibrium potential for protons is more positive than +70 mV. Consequently, there is a large driving force for protons through H + channels. At Vm values 60 mV more negative than EK, light transitions induced large changes of Im (Fig. 4). These were not accompanied by corresponding changes ofg m . The changes in / m may result from different channels other than the K + -ORC. If K + -channels were responsible Table 1. Change of membrane current and conductance as a result of LD and DL transitions at changing ORC activity and the potential candidates possibly involved Typical responses presented in ORC-activated Effect of LD and DL transitions Change of /„ Change of gm Fig. 3 channels: H \ C r , Fig. 4 + Fig. 5 Fig. 7 Potential source for current change — t "Involvement of K * channel activity different from ORC and IRC activity cannot be excluded, but seems unlikely. H + pump channels: H + . Cl". H + pump channels Ca2 + H + pump channels: Cl" H + pump Light modulates channel and pump for the current changes, a conductance change of at least 0.34 nS would have been required. Moreover, the whole cell 7/K-curve in Fig. 1 (inset) suggests that all ORCs were inactivated at —120 mV. It was concluded that the ORCs are not involved in the light response at these potentials. Alternatively, at these values of the membrane potential the proton pump and a passive proton conductance are likely candidates to cause changes of 7m. To evaluate the contribution of the passive proton conductances, symmetrical solutions for bath and pipette were used to nullify the effects of a proton gradient. At 0 mV (Km near KrORC and VTC]), large positive currents could be detected (Fig. 5), which can only be caused by proton pump activity. Again, light transitions induced changes of Im and gm. At this Vm, potassium, chloride or passive proton fluxes do not contribute to changes in 7m. So, transient light-induced current changes should be due to changes in pump activity, although a small contribution of calcium fluxes cannot be excluded. At present there is no explanation for the irreproducibility of the long-term responses. Apparently, both channel and pump activities contributed to the light responses. The inhibiting effect ofverapamil (Fig. 6) on light-induced changes of gm (Fig. 7) confirmed the involvement of the proton pump activity. The mechanism of the light response in protoplasts is still unclear. In these experiments only mesophyll cells responded to light, while root cells and chlorophylldeficient cells did not respond. This suggests a relationship with the presence of chloroplasts. Several authors (Mimura and Tazawa, 1986; Hansen et al., 1987; Vanselow et al., 1989) have suggested that light interception at the chloroplast is coupled with hyperpolarization or depolarization at the plasma membrane. It has been suggested that rapid changes of the plasma membrane are coupled with light-induced proton uptake by the inner thylakoid space (Vanselow et al., 1989). Hansen et al. (1987) presented a detailed model which describes the relation between the light response at the thylakoid membrane and polarization of the plasma membrane. In this model cytosolic pH changes play an intermediate role. Spalding and Goldsmith (1993) demonstrated with single channel experiments that light-induced K + channel activity at the plasma membrane depends on the availability of ATP. This suggests that the photosynthetic activity in photosystems I and II initiates a cascade of responses which results in current changes at the plasma membrane. Indeed, in these experiments the responses to light transitions only occurred in protoplasts that contained chloroplasts. Surprisingly, inhibitors of photosystems 1 and II did not block the light responses. Moreover, when green light of low intensity was used, normal LD and DL responses were detected. A possible explanation for this phenomenon is that only a minimum of the photosynthetic 1629 activity which remained after addition of the inhibitors, may be required to trigger the light response. Although the origin of the transient light responses at the plasma membrane was not revealed, the existence of light responses in which both proton pump and channel activity are involved was shown clearly. It may be concluded that the whole cell configuration is a powerful tool to study the effect of light transitions on pump and channel activity simultaneously. Acknowledgements We are very grateful to Dr JPFG Helsper and Dr BW Veen for the critical reading of the manuscript. References Althoff G, Lill H, Junge W. 1989. Proton channel of the chloroplast ATP synthase, CFO: its time-averaged singlechannels conductance as a function of pH, temperature, isotopic and ionic composition. Journal of Membrane Biology 108,263-71. Beilby MJ, Mimura T, Shimmen T. 1993. The proton pump, high pH channels, and excitation—voltage clamp studies of intact and perfused cells of Nitellopsis obtusa. Protoplasma 175, 144-52. Blatt MR. 1991. Ion channel gating in plants: physiological implications and integration for stomatal function. Journal of Membrane Biology 124, 95-112. Blom-Zandsrra M, Koot H, van Hattum J, Vogelzang SA. 1995. Isolation of protoplasts for patch-clamp experiments: an improved method requiring minimal amounts of adult leaf or root tissue from monocotyledonous or dicotyledonous plants. Protoplasma 185, 1-6. Bulycbev AA, Adrianov VK, Kurella GA, Litvin FF. 1972. Microelectrode measurements of the transmembrane potential of chloroplasts and its photoinduced changes. Nature 236, 175-7. De Ruiter H, Uffing AJM, Meinen E, Prins A. 1990. Influence of surfactants and plant species on leaf retention of spray solutions. Weed Science 38, 567-72. Findlay GP, Hope AB. 1976. Electrical properties of plant cells: methods and findings. In: Lflttge U, Pitman MG, eds. Encyclopaedia of plant physiology, New series, Vol.2. Transport in plants II. Part A, Cells. Berlin, Heidelberg, New York: Springer-Verlag, 53-92. Hamill OP, Marty A, Neber E, Sakmann B, Sigworth FJ. 1981. Improved patch-clamp techniques for high-resolution current recording from cells and cell-free membrane patches. Pflugers Archiv. European Journal of Physiology 391, 85-100. Hansen U-P, Kolbowski J, Dau H. 1987. Relationship between photosynthesis and plasmalemma transport. Journal of Experimental Botany 38, 1965-81. Hedrich R, Schroeder JI, 1989. The physiology of ion channels and electrogenic pumps in higher plants. Annual Review of Plant Physiology and Plant Molecular Biology 40, 539-69. Jeschke WD. 1976. Ionic relations of leaf cells. In: Lflttge U, Pitman MG, eds. Encyclopaedia of Plant Physiology, New series, Vol. 2. Transport in plants II. Part B, Tissues and organs. Berlin, Heidelberg, New York: Springer-Verlag, 160-94. Jordi W, Dekhuijzen HM, Stoopen GM, Overbeek JHM. 1993. 1630 Blom-Zandstra et al. Role of other plant organs in gibberellic acid-induced delay of leaf senescence in Alstroemeria cut flowers. Phvsiologia Plantarum 87, 426-32. Koomeef M, Hanhart CJ, van der Veen JH. 1991. A genetic and physiological analysis of late flowering mutants in Arabidopsis thaliana L. Molecular and General Genetics 229, 57-66. Marre E. 1979. Fusicoccin: a tool in plant physiology. Annual Review of Plant Physiology 30, 273-88. Mimura T, Tazawa M. 1986. Light-induced membrane hyperpolarization and adenine nucleotide levels in perfused characean cells. Plant and Cell Physiology 27, 319-30. Spalding EP, Cosgrove DJ. 1992. Mechanism of blue-lightinduced plasma-membrane depolarization in etiolated cucumber hypocotyls. Planta 188, 199-205. Spalding EP, Goldsmith MHM. 1993. Activation of K + channels in the plasma membrane of Arabidopsis by ATP produced photosynthetically. The Plant Cell 5, 477-84. Spalding EP, Slayman CL, Goldsmith MHM, Gradmann D, Bertl A. 1992. Ion channels in Arabidopsis plasma membrane. Transport characteristics and involvement in light-induced voltage changes. Plant Physiology 99, 96-102. Spanswick RM. 1972. Evidence for an electrogenic pump in Nitella translucens. I. The effects of pH, K + , Na + , light, and temperature on the membrane potential and resistence. Biochimica et Biophysica Ada 288, 73-89. Spanswick RM. 1974. Evidence for an electrogenic ion pump in Nitella translucens. II. Control of the light-stimulated component of the membrane potential. Biochimica et Biophvswa Ada 332, 387-98. Steiner AA. 1968. Soilless culture. Proceedings of the 6th Colloquium of the International Potash institute. Florence/Italy. International Potash Institute Bern/ Switzerland, 324-41. Thomine S, Zimmermann S, Van Duijn B, Barbier-Brygoo H, Guern J. 1994. Calcium channel antagonists induce direct inhibition of the outward rectifying potassium channel in tobacco protoplasts, FEBS Letters 340, 45-50. Van Duijn B. 1993. Hodgkin-Huxlcy analysis of whole-cell outward rectifying K + -currents in protoplasts from tobacco cell suspension cultures. Journal of Membrane Biology 132, 77-85. Van Duijn B, Ypey DL, Libbenga R. 1993. Whole-cell K + currents across the plasma membrane of tobacco protoplasts from cell-suspension cultures. Plant Physiology 101, 81-8. Vanselow KH, Kolbowski J, Hansen U-P. 1989. Further evidence for the relationship between light-induced changes of plasmalemma transport and transthylakoid proton uptake. Journal of Experimental Botany 211, 239—45. Vredenberg WJ. 1974. Changes in transport determining electrical parameters of cell and chloroplast membranes associated with primary and associated photosynthetic reactions. In: U. Zimmermann, J. Dainty, eds. Membrane transport in plants. Berlin, Heidelberg, New York: Springer, 126-30. Vogelzang SA, Prins HBA. 1992. Plasmalemma patch-clamp experiments in plant root cells: procedure for fast isolation of protoplasts with minimal exposure to cell wall degrading enzymes. Protoplasma 171, 104-9. Vogelzang SA, Prins HBA. 1995. Kinetic analysis of two simultaneously activated K + - currents in root cell protoplasts of Plant ago media L. Journal of Membrane Biology 146, 59-71.