Download Oxidative Phosphorylation Goal: ATP Synthesis

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts

Sulfur cycle wikipedia , lookup

Mitochondrial replacement therapy wikipedia , lookup

Basal metabolic rate wikipedia , lookup

Photosynthesis wikipedia , lookup

Phosphorylation wikipedia , lookup

Mitochondrion wikipedia , lookup

Metalloprotein wikipedia , lookup

Photosynthetic reaction centre wikipedia , lookup

Thylakoid wikipedia , lookup

Nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide wikipedia , lookup

Biochemistry wikipedia , lookup

Metabolism wikipedia , lookup

Microbial metabolism wikipedia , lookup

Evolution of metal ions in biological systems wikipedia , lookup

Glycolysis wikipedia , lookup

Light-dependent reactions wikipedia , lookup

Adenosine triphosphate wikipedia , lookup

Citric acid cycle wikipedia , lookup

Electron transport chain wikipedia , lookup

NADH:ubiquinone oxidoreductase (H+-translocating) wikipedia , lookup

Oxidative phosphorylation wikipedia , lookup

Transcript
7/20/2016
Oxidative Phosphorylation
Pratt and Cornely, Chapter 15
Goal: ATP Synthesis 1
7/20/2016
Overview
• Redox reactions
• Electron transport chain
• Proton gradient
• ATP synthesis
• Shuttles
Analogy: How does burning coal put flour in the grocery store?
Standard Reduction Potential
• “potential to be reduced”
• Listed according to oxidized compound being reduced
• High RP means that the compound is a strong oxidizer (ie O2)
• Its conjugate is a strong reducing agent (ie NADH)
2
7/20/2016
Half Reactions
• Reduction potential written in terms of a reduction half reaction
• Aox  Ared
• Example: Calculate Eo for reduction of FMN by NADH, given the Eo of FMN to be ‐0.30V
• Then calculate Go
NADH + FMN  NAD+ + FMNH2
Redox reactions: electricity
• 2 e‐ transfer
• Calculate G by reduction potential
• NAD+: Eo’ = ‐.32
• FMN: Eo’=‐.30
• Eo’ = +0.02V
• Go’ = ‐nFEo’ = ‐2(96485 J/mol
V)(0.02V)
= ‐3.9 kJ/mol
3
7/20/2016
Numerous Redox Substrates
• Chain of decreasing reduction potential
• Mobile carriers vs. within Complex
• Types of substrates
– Organic cofactors
– Metals (iron/sulfur clusters)
– Cytochromes
– O2
Overall chain from NADH
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
NADH
Complex I
Q
Complex III
Cyt c
Complex IV
O2
4
7/20/2016
Within Complexes
• FAD/FMN
– Prosthetic group
– Bridge from 2 e‐ donors to 1 e‐ donors
• Iron‐sulfur clusters
Coenzyme Q: Mobile Carrier
• 2 e‐ carrier, 1 e‐
acceptor/donor
• Ubiquinone is a mobile carrier
• Can diffuse through nonpolar regions easily
• “Q pool” made by Complex I and Complex II (and others)
5
7/20/2016
Cytochrome c
• Mobile carrier
• Protein/heme
• 1 electron carrier
Oxygen: the final electron acceptor
• Water is produced—has very low reactivity, very stable
• Superoxide, peroxide as toxic intermediates
• Overall reaction
NADH + H+ + ½ O2  NAD+ + H2O
6
7/20/2016
Flow Through Complexes
7
7/20/2016
Compartmentalization
Protonmotive Force
• NADH + H+ + ½ O2  NAD+ + H2O + 10 H+ pumped
• succinate + ½ O2  fumarate + H2O + 6 H+ pumped
8
7/20/2016
Complex I
• NADH  Q through
– FMN
– Iron‐sulfur clusters
• “Q pool”
• 4 protons pumped
– Proton wire
Complex II
• Non‐NADH sources
– Complex II (citric acid cycle)
– Fatty acid oxidation
– Glycerol‐3‐phosphate shuttle (glycolysis)
• Bypasses Complex I – Loss of 4 protons pumped
9
7/20/2016
Complex III
•
•
•
•
QH2  cytochromes
4 protons pumped
Through Q cycle
Problem 10: An iron‐
sulfur protein in Complex III donates an electron to cytochrome c. Use the half reactions below to calculate the standard free energy change. How can you account for the fact that this process is spontaneous in the cell?
FeS (ox) + e‐  FeS (red) Eo’ = 0.280 V
Cyt c (Fe3+) + e‐  cyt c (Fe2+) Eo’ = 0.215 V
10
7/20/2016
Complex IV
• Cytochromes  O2
• Stoichiometry of half of an oxygen atom
NADH into Matrix
• NADH of glycolysis must get “into” matrix
• Not direct
• Needs either
– malate‐aspartate shuttle (liver)
– Glycerol‐3‐phosphate shuttle (muscle)
• Costs 1 ATP worth of proton gradients, but allows for transport against NADH gradient
11
7/20/2016
Glycerol‐3‐phosphate Shuttle
• Glycerol phosphate shuttle (1.5 ATP/NADH)
• Produces QH2
• Operational in some tissues/circumstances
Overall
• Chemiosmosis
• 10 protons shuttled from matrix to intermembrane space
• Makes pH gradient and ion gradient 12
7/20/2016
Problem 39
• How did these key experiments support the chemiosmotic theory of Peter Mitchell?
– The pH of the intermembrane space is lower than the pH of the mitochondrial matrix.
– Oxidative phosphorylation does not occur in mitochondrial preparations to which detergents have been added.
– Lipid‐soluble compounds inhibit oxidative phosphorylation while allowing electron transport to continue.
Proton Gradient
• Gradient driven by concentration difference + charge difference
– Assume pH 0.5 and 170mV membrane potential
• Free energy of ATP hydrolysis = ‐48 kJ/mole
• How many protons needed to fuel ATP formation? Minimum of 3
13
7/20/2016
Protonmotive Force
• Flow of electrons is useless if not coupled to a useful process
– Battery connected to wire
• Proton gradient across mitochondrial membrane
Using the Gradient
• Coupled to ATP synthesis
• Uncouplers used to show link of oxygen uptake and ATP synthesis
14
7/20/2016
Complex V: ATP Synthase
• Molecular motor
• Rotor: c, , 
– Proton channel
Proton Channel
• Protons enters channel between rotor and stator • Rotor rotates to release strain by allowing proton to enter matrix
• 8‐ 10 protons = full rotation
– Species dependent
15
7/20/2016
• “Stalk” () moves inside the“knob”—
hexameric ATP synthase
• Knob held stationary by “b”
16
7/20/2016
Hexameric Knob
Binding‐Change Mechanism
• Stalk causes ATP synthase to have three different conformations: open, loose, tight
• In “tight” conformation, energy has been used to cause an energy conformation that favors ATP formation
17
7/20/2016
Remember Analogy
• Fuelelectricitywater pumped uphillflows down to grind flour
• But we don’t have bread until flour is transported to where it needs to go!
• Compartmentalization: ATP is in matrix, but must get to the rest of the cell
Active Transport of ATP
• ATP must go out, ADP and Pi must go in
• Together, use about 1 proton of protonmotive
force
18
7/20/2016
Energy Accounting
• ATP costs 2.7 protons
– 8 protons produces 3 ATP
• NADH pumps 10 protons when 2 e‐ reduce ½ O2
– 4 protons in Complex I, 4 protons in Complex III, and 2 protons in Complex IV
• P/O ratio‐‐# of phosphorylation per oxygen atom
– 10H+/NADH (1 ATP/2.7 H+) = 3.7 ATP/NADH
– 6H+/QH2 (1 ATP/2.7 H+) = 2.3 ATP/QH2
• In vivo, P/O ratio closer to 2.5 and 1.5 due to other proton “leaking”
– i.e. importing phosphate
Uncouplers
• “Uncouple” protonmotive force from ATP synthase
– DNP pKa / solubility perfectly suitable
• Other respiration poisons
– Cyanide—binds Complex IV in place of oxygen
19
7/20/2016
Net ATP Harvest from Glucose
• Glycolysis = 2 ATP
– Plus 3 or 5 ATP from NADH
– What leads to difference in this case?
• Pyruvate DH = 5 ATP
• Citric Acid Cycle = 20 ATP
• Total: 30‐32 ATP/glucose
Problem 47
• A culture of yeast grown under anaerobic conditions is exposed to oxygen, resulting in dramatic decrease in glucose consumption. This is called the Pasteur effect. Explain.
• The [NADH]/[NAD+] and [ATP]/A[ADP] ratios also change when an anaerobic culture is exposed to oxygen. Explain how the ratios change and what effect this has on glycolysis and the citric acid cycle in yeast.
20