Download Problem 2

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts

Ubiquitin wikipedia , lookup

List of types of proteins wikipedia , lookup

Implicit solvation wikipedia , lookup

Rosetta@home wikipedia , lookup

Protein wikipedia , lookup

Circular dichroism wikipedia , lookup

Protein design wikipedia , lookup

Bimolecular fluorescence complementation wikipedia , lookup

G protein–coupled receptor wikipedia , lookup

Proteomics wikipedia , lookup

Protein moonlighting wikipedia , lookup

Protein folding wikipedia , lookup

Protein mass spectrometry wikipedia , lookup

Western blot wikipedia , lookup

Structural alignment wikipedia , lookup

Protein purification wikipedia , lookup

Cyclol wikipedia , lookup

Intrinsically disordered proteins wikipedia , lookup

Trimeric autotransporter adhesin wikipedia , lookup

Nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy of proteins wikipedia , lookup

Homology modeling wikipedia , lookup

Protein–protein interaction wikipedia , lookup

Protein structure prediction wikipedia , lookup

Protein domain wikipedia , lookup

Alpha helix wikipedia , lookup

Metalloprotein wikipedia , lookup

Transcript
Problem 2. I was curious about the neighborhood of the helix, so I made a
picture of the whole protein.
Clearly this helix is likely to be involved in binding the heme.
Next I went to the helical wheel web site and made a picture; I also made a
picture of just that helix with Rasmol, selecting the hydrophobic residues and
coloring them:
Noticing that His 93 is in between two hydrophobic residues that should face the
interior of the protein, I decided to see if that His was bound to the heme iron:
Bingo.
Problem 3. The first thing I did was to go to the PDBSum server and enter the
code for the protein I picked, human serum transferring, 1d3k. PDB Sum gives a
complete analysis of the protein structure, including domains and motifs.
I found the protein to consist of two domains:
Reading from the graphics I found domain A to consist of residues 93-248 and
domain B is residues 4-78 plus 250-305. Looking at the graphic of the overall
structure, I found residues 79-92 to form several turns connecting the domains.
I then made a picture to display the domains:
To locate motifs, I consulted PDBSum again. It pointed out two  motifs, one
of which proved to be a :
The web site also located a single -hairpin and several -bulges. I had no idea
what a -bulge is, so I picked one and made a picture.
Finally, a -loop was indicated, and I had no idea what one of those was either.
So here it is:
It looks like just a twisted -strand.
Finally, to see how this all fit together, I made a picture of the protein with all the
motifs picked out. The  motifs are red, the -hairpin is green, the -bulge is
cyan, and the -loop is purple:
Problem 10. We can use either Rasmol or SwissPDB to examine the structure.
I used Swiss PDB first, displaying the heme in spacefilling model, and then using
the mode that allows me to pick an atom and display all residues with XX
distance of it. This is the ninth button from the left, with an eye, a circle, and 1 Å
displayed. I chose an atom on the heme (aiming for the iron, but missing) and a
distance of 6.0 A:
Rice (1ccr)
Tuna (5cyt)
Using Rasmol, we need the “select within” and “restrict selected” commands I
typed “select within (5.0, iron)” and then “restrict selected”, so the display
contained only the residues within 5 A of the iron. Then I selected and displayed
the heme. The results:
Rice (1ccr)
Tuna (5cyt)
Clearly, the ligands on the iron are strongly conserved, as is the Tyr, which is
probably hydrogen bonding to one of the heme nitrogens.
Finally, I did a sequence alignment using BioEdit:
The two proteins have 55% sequence identity and 69% similarity. The red lines
mark the conserved His and Met, which are both within strongly conserved
regions of the protein. Most of the variation appears to be at the N-terminal ends
of the proteins, well away from the functional part.