* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download CCL Monthly Conference Call, Saturday, Sept. 6, 2014 Groups meet
Myron Ebell wikipedia , lookup
Climate change denial wikipedia , lookup
Climate sensitivity wikipedia , lookup
Climatic Research Unit documents wikipedia , lookup
Global warming controversy wikipedia , lookup
Climate change adaptation wikipedia , lookup
Fred Singer wikipedia , lookup
Effects of global warming on human health wikipedia , lookup
Climate change in Tuvalu wikipedia , lookup
General circulation model wikipedia , lookup
Climate-friendly gardening wikipedia , lookup
Climate change mitigation wikipedia , lookup
Economics of climate change mitigation wikipedia , lookup
Climate change and agriculture wikipedia , lookup
Economics of global warming wikipedia , lookup
Effects of global warming on humans wikipedia , lookup
Global warming wikipedia , lookup
Attribution of recent climate change wikipedia , lookup
Scientific opinion on climate change wikipedia , lookup
Climate engineering wikipedia , lookup
Carbon pricing in Australia wikipedia , lookup
German Climate Action Plan 2050 wikipedia , lookup
Media coverage of global warming wikipedia , lookup
Climate change, industry and society wikipedia , lookup
United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change wikipedia , lookup
Solar radiation management wikipedia , lookup
Effects of global warming on Australia wikipedia , lookup
Climate governance wikipedia , lookup
Surveys of scientists' views on climate change wikipedia , lookup
2009 United Nations Climate Change Conference wikipedia , lookup
Climate change and poverty wikipedia , lookup
Climate change in Canada wikipedia , lookup
Climate change in the United States wikipedia , lookup
Public opinion on global warming wikipedia , lookup
Low-carbon economy wikipedia , lookup
Mitigation of global warming in Australia wikipedia , lookup
Climate change feedback wikipedia , lookup
Politics of global warming wikipedia , lookup
IPCC Fourth Assessment Report wikipedia , lookup
Carbon Pollution Reduction Scheme wikipedia , lookup
CCL Monthly Conference Call, Saturday, Sept. 6, 2014 Groups meet at 9:45am PT/12:45pm ET The international conference call starts at 10:00 am PT/1:00 pm ET The conference call part of the meeting is a little over an hour long and the groups meet for another hour after that to take and plan actions. Call-in number: 1-866-642-1665, passcode: 440699# Callers outside U.S. and Canada, please use Skype: 719-387-8317, passcode 440699# Rear Adm. Len Hering (ret.), Center for Sustainable Energy Rear Admiral Len Hering Sr. (ret.) joins our national call to talk about the impact that climate change is having on national security. Hering is Executive Director of the Center for Sustainable Energy in San Diego. During his career in the Navy, Hering built a team that reduced energy consumption by nearly 42%, diverted 75% of Navy waste from landfills and reduced water consumption by more than one billion gallons. He instigated wind, thermal, photovoltaic and conversion technology at all levels in Navy facilities. Actions 1. Write letters to members of Congress (MoCs) mentioning the UN Climate Summit this month and the need for the U.S. to lead on solutions for carbon fee and dividend. 2. Pitch CCL’s current media packet to editorial writers. 3. Ask a state official to submit comments to the EPA, requesting that a carbon tax be explicitly mentioned as a means for states to comply with the new regulations. LASER TALK Leadership on global climate action It’s been reported1 that President Obama is pursuing a global climate treaty that will be non-binding and instead rely on a “name and shame” approach to make countries comply with targets for emissions reductions. Nations of the world will gather in Paris in late 20152 to sign an agreement in which countries will commit to emissions targets that will limit the risks of global warming. Obama is reportedly pursuing “voluntary” goals because the Senate is unlikely to ratify, with a two-thirds majority, any binding agreement. Treaties that do not have the force of law do not require Senate ratification. In relying on a “name and shame” approach for compliance, however, the world runs a great risk of failing to cut emissions to levels that avoid catastrophic consequences. The future of our world and its ability to sustain all forms of life cannot be left to such chance. If a voluntary treaty emerges in Paris next year at the urging of the U.S., then the U.S. must provide the leadership for the world to meet its emissions goals. For starters, the U.S. can lead by example, by implementing a steadily-rising fee on carbon-based fuels that returns revenue to households. By including border tariffs3 on goods from nations that lack an equivalent price on carbon, we provide a strong economic incentive for other nations to follow that lead. In the run up to the Paris agreement next year, Congress can establish U.S. leadership by enacting carbon fee-and-dividend legislation. 1 http://www.nytimes.com/2014/08/27/us/politics/obama-pursuing-climate-accord-in-lieu-of- treaty.html?_r=1 2 Five Things to Know About the Climate Talks, from The Hill: http://thehill.com/policy/energy-environment/216285-climate-talks-five-things-to-know 3 CCLU webinar on border tax adjustments can be viewed on YouTube here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=suC923ODptQ ACTION Write to representatives and senators in connection with UN Climate Summit On September 23, world leaders will gather at the United Nations for a one-day Climate Summit, an event intended to generate momentum for the current negotiations that will lead to a global climate treaty late next year in Paris. With the summit, and events surrounding it like the People’s Climate March, being in the news, this is an opportune time to write to members of Congress to urge their leadership on climate change. At your meeting this month: Write letters to your senators and representative. Plan a letter-writing event in your community. Outline for letter: Introduce yourself and share something personal about who you are. Thank the MoC and their staff for anything they may have done recently, such as meeting with CCL in Washington or in the district. Mention that the attention of the world is focused this month on world leaders who are attending the UN Climate Summit. Tell them it’s time for Congress to demonstrate leadership by enacting a fee on carbon that gives revenue back to households. Ask for a reply. Points you can bring up (use no more than two): Mention some of the ways that climate change is affecting your region. National Climate Assessment has a regional breakout. At the UN Climate Summit on Sept. 23, world leaders – including President Obama – will speak about their nations’ efforts to contain global warming. It’s important that the U.S. be seen as a leader in this movement and that we can follow through on our commitments. The New York Times reported on Aug. 26th that Obama will seek a climate treaty with voluntary goals because the President does not believe the Senate will ratify a binding agreement. This is disappointing and creates the risk that the world will fall far short in efforts to limit carbon pollution and the warming it causes. Even if a climate treaty is non-binding, the U.S. can help ensure the world reaches much needed goals by leading with a strong policy that puts an escalating fee on carbon. Border adjustments on goods from nations that do not price carbon will provide a strong economic incentive for other countries to follow our lead. Carbon fee-and-dividend is a solution supported by a number of conservative, freemarket economists, like former Secretary of State George Shultz – who maintain that the market will move away from polluting sources of energy if we fix the distortion that currently exists in the price of fossil fuels. They say this distortion exists because the price of dirty energy does not reflect the damage done to society. A recent study from Regional Economic Models, Inc. shows that we can reduce emissions AND add jobs to the economy, provided we put a rising fee on carbonbased fuels and return the revenue from that fee to households. The REMI study found that with a fee on carbon starting at $10 per ton of CO2 and rising $10 per ton each year, in 20 years we can reduce emissions to 50 percent below 1990 levels. By giving all revenue back to households, the fee-and-dividend solution provides an economic stimulus that adds 2.8 million jobs to the American economy over those 20 years. Addresses You can find the district mailing addresses by looking up your representatives and senators on congressional Web sites. You can also send letters to Washington offices at these addresses: Rep. NAME HERE U.S. House of Representatives Washington, DC 20515 Sen. NAME HERE U.S. Senate Washington, DC 20510 ACTION Pitch CCL’s media packet to editorial writers With the UN Climate Summit happening Sept. 23, as well as the People’s Climate March in New York, the subject of climate change will be in the news, and newspapers may take this opportunity to weigh in editorially on the issue. CCL has prepared a media packet to coincide with the climate summit that calls for Congress to enact a fee a carbon with revenue returned to households. The call for action is supported by the study from Regional Economic Models, Inc. about the benefits – both environmental and economic – of such a solution. The aim of the packet is to motivate newspapers to endorse carbon fee and dividend as the means to address global warming. This month… Prior to the UN Summit, have the volunteer in your group who works with the local newspaper pitch CCL’s media packet to the appropriate person on your newspaper’s editorial board. If possible, arrange a meeting to brief the newspaper about the REMI study and pitch the packet in person. We suggest a phone call followed by emailing the media packet. Sample phone pitch: Hi. This is [YOUR NAME] with Citizens Climate Lobby in [YOUR CITY]. Do you have a minute? Is this a good time? Thanks. There’s something coming up in the news, and we thought the newspaper might consider doing an editorial about it. On September 23, leaders from around the world will gather at the UN for a one-day climate summit. They’re building momentum for a global climate treaty that nations will sign late in 2015. This is the time for the U.S. to lead with a solution that will not only address global warming but also add jobs to our economy. A study done by the highly-respected Regional Economic Models, Inc., looked at the impact of a gradually-rising fee on carbon with revenue returned to households. It found that after 20 years, CO2 emissions would go down 50 percent. It also found that all the revenue being recycled back to households would create an economic stimulus that adds 2.8 million jobs over that time. We have a media packet on this with links to resources you might find useful. Can I send that to you? If your group can meet with the newspaper, ask if they’d like to meet to provide a briefing on the REMI study. If your group has already briefed the editorial board on the REMI study, simply pitch the media packet to the appropriate newspaper contact. Follow up to find out if the newspaper plans to write an editorial. If the answer is “no,” ask if they would consider an op-ed from the CCL chapter. Use the media packet for talking points to draft an op-ed. Include local angles like the impact of climate change in your area and calling upon your members of Congress to lead on this proposal. The media packet can be downloaded here: http://citizensclimatelobby.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/09/CCLmediapacketSept2014v3.doc ACTION Ask a state official to comment on EPA’s carbon rule Last month, we asked volunteers to submit comments to the EPA and ask that a carbon tax be explicitly mentioned as a means for states to comply with the new regulations. Following up on that action this month, we are asking for volunteers to reach out to state officials, asking them to submit similar comments to the EPA. As with our lobbying efforts with members of Congress, a face-to-face meeting with the state official will increase the chances for success. Which state official should you contact? Each state has a department or agency that handles environmental rules and regulations. You can find a list of names and contact information for the appropriate state official(s) in each state from the spreadsheet that is downloadable here: http://citizensclimatelobby.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/State-EPA-Contacts.xlsx Governors are also good to lobby on this. If more than one group has access to a state's capitol, the two groups should split lobbying the official in the spreadsheet and the Governor's office. Which groups should contact the state official? For states that have more than one CCL chapter, the group that is in the state capitol should contact the official. For example, in Wisconsin, the CCL Madison group would contact the state official. If there is no CCL chapter in the state capital, CCL group leaders in the state should contact each other and decide which group will make contact. Once it’s been determined which group will make contact, choose one person in the group who will be responsible for the action. The context: In June, the EPA released draft rules limiting the carbon emissions that can come from existing power sources. These existing power sources must cut their emissions to 30% below 2005 levels by 2030. These rules apply only to power sources, so fossil fuels used for anything else (transportation, home heating, etc.) are not affected by this rule. The final rule will be published in June of 2015. Comments are being accepted until Oct. 16, 2014. The EPA is not telling states how to meet the targets. Rather, they are letting states choose how to comply with the rule. Much of the draft rule includes ways that states could be in compliance with the new rule. The EPA focuses on 4 “building blocks” for the best system of emissions reductions: improving efficiency of coal plants, switching to natural gas, increasing renewables, and reducing demand. Conspicuously absent from the 645-page draft rule is any explicit mention of a carbon tax as a compliance mechanism. The closest they come is mentioning a “carbon price,” which is not specific enough, as this may also refer to cap-and-trade. EPA officials have stated in public that a carbon tax is a viable compliance mechanism, but if it is not in print, it is unlikely that states will want to take the risk of not being in compliance. Why lobby state officials? State officials carry a lot of weight in Washington DC. It is possible that the EPA did not explicitly mention a carbon tax because they are concerned about being accused of overreaching their authority. If several state officials specifically request that EPA include it, the EPA has the political cover they need to include it. In short, state officials are the type of political will that EPA responds to, and we need to generate it. Resource The EPA ask for state officials: http://citizensclimatelobby.org/wpcontent/uploads/2014/09/EPAAskforStateOfficials.pdf Background reading If you are interested in including a more technical comment, you can read more about the EPA rule here: https://www.federalregister.gov/articles/2014/06/18/201413726/carbon-pollution-emission-guidelines-for-existing-stationary-sources-electricutility-generating#h-49 You can download the REMI at this site: http://citizensclimatelobby.org/wpcontent/uploads/2014/06/REMI-Synapse-Carbon-Fee-and-Dividend-Slide-Deck6.9.141.pdf You can access the CBO’s assessment concluding a carbon tax is more economically efficient than cap and trade here: http://www.cbo.gov/publication/41663 Vote for CCL proposal in Climate CoLab contest CCL’s proposal in the “U.S. Carbon Price” category of MIT’s Climate CoLab contest has been selected as a finalist. Please vote for the proposal – “The Little Engine that Could: Carbon Fee and Dividend” – at this link: http://climatecolab.org/web/guest/plans/-/plans/contestId/1300404/planId/2802