* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download link to lecture - Welcome to brd4.braude.ac.il!
Monoclonal antibody wikipedia , lookup
DNA vaccination wikipedia , lookup
Hygiene hypothesis wikipedia , lookup
Lymphopoiesis wikipedia , lookup
Immune system wikipedia , lookup
Polyclonal B cell response wikipedia , lookup
Psychoneuroimmunology wikipedia , lookup
Molecular mimicry wikipedia , lookup
Adaptive immune system wikipedia , lookup
Immunosuppressive drug wikipedia , lookup
Cancer immunotherapy wikipedia , lookup
Microspheres as Delivery Systems for Vaccines Rosa Azhari, Ditza Levin,Yaffa MizrachiNebenzahl2,Eti Taub, Amir Dagan Department of Biotechnology Engineering, ORT Braude College, Karmiel, Israel and 2Pediatric Infectious Disease Unit, Soroka Medical Center, Beer Sheva, Israel Vaccine Development is required for: • Infectious Diseases (HIV, Hepatitis, SARS etc.) • Cancer Immunotherapy • Aoutoimmune Diseases Control • Allergy Suppression Routes of Immunization Oral Imtramascular, Subcutaneous, Intraperitoneal Adjuvants Enhancement of a specific immune response to vaccines and generation of long-term immune memory Alum – the only adjuvant currently approved for use in humans, (other adjuvants undergoing clinical trials at different phases) Limitations – not potent enough with the new generation of antigens, directs towards one type of response (Th2) Requirements from an Adjuvant Adjuvant Functions: Strategy: • Delivery to Antigen Presenting Cells (APC) • Antigen Encapsulation in microparticles • Active targeting • Addition of immunomodulating agents • Immuno-stimulation • Slow Release New Adjuvant Candidates: • Particulates – liposomes microspheres virosomes • Complexes with stimulating agents Microspheres Formation by Complex Coacervation -- - -- - - Interaction Stabilization -- + + + + + + + + + + --+ + -- ++- +- + + - - + -+- + Precipitation Microspheres Formation Complex Coacervation of Gelatin and Chondroitin Sulfate Gelatin – Derivative of Collagen Positively charged at lower pH’s pI=6.5 Chondroitin Sulfate - Polysaccharide O COOO OH OH D- Glucuronic acid CH2OH OSO-3 O O Negatively charged O n NHCOCH3 N-Acetyl- galactosamine-4-sulfate SEM Micrographs of Ge-CS Microspheres Effect of CS Concentration on the size of the Microspheres 0.2% 0.3% 0.1% 0.15% Gelatin-Chondroitin sulfate (Ge-CS) Microspheres’ Advantages for Vaccination: Complex coacervation is a mild process that does not damage the bioactivity of cytokines, antigens or peptides. Ge/CS MS are biodegradable and can be digested by proteases in the extracellular matrix and in the lysosomes of professional APC. Ge and CS contain functional groups to which targeting moieties can be attached. Why is targeting important? Antigen Presenting Cells (APC): MHC class II positive APC Th MQ Ag CD4 “Non-Self” DC Ag Produce cytokines that provide help for humoral (antibodies) and cellular immune responses “Self” Tc CD8 BC Ag Kill pathogen-infected cells and tumor cells. MHC class I positive APC Antigen Presenting Cells (APC): Th Immune Responses: Cell Mediated Immunity Th1 MQ Ag DC BC Ag To Viruses Intracellular pathogens Tumor Cells T1Th1 Humoral Immunity (Antibodies) Ag Th2 Bacteria Toxins Extracellular pathogens The Role of Th1 and Th2 in the Pathology or Resolution of Diseases Th1 Infectious Disease • Leishmaniasis • Tuberculosis • Leprosy • AIDS Th2 Protection Protection Protection Protection Damaging Damaging Damaging Damaging Autoimmune Disease • Diabetes (IDDM) • Multiple sclerosis • Crohn’s disease • Autoimmune thyroid disease Damaging Damaging Damaging Damaging Protection Protection Protection Protection Atopic Allergy Protection Damaging Pregnancy • Fetal Tolerance • Unexplained recurrent abortions Damaging Damaging Protection Protection Gelatin-Chondroitin sulfate (Ge-CS) Microspheres’ Advantages for Vaccination: Activated T-cells express Ge receptors microspheres may attract T cells to the vaccination site. CS induces maturation of DC. Can Ge/CS microspheres target antigens to professional APC? In-Vitro Presentation of Encapsulated Ag Experimental system CD4/CD8 OVA-specific Hybridomas BO-97-11 B3Z OVA presentation IL-2/ IL-2, LacZ by APC In-vitro Presentation of Encapsulated Ag to CD4 or CD8 T Cells Total Spleen Cells MQ DC BC CD4 OVA specific Hybridomas BO-97-11 APC + MS-OVA or APC + Soluble OVA IL-2 MQ and DC can present the Encapsulated Ag to CD4 Th Cells invitro Sol-OVA MS-OVA MS-Ag 1.6 MQ 1.6 DC 1.2 Soluble-Ag BC 1.2 0.8 0.8 0.4 0.4 0 0 10^2 10^3 10^4 10^5 10^6 10^2 APC/well APC/well 10^3 10^4 10^5 10^6 Il-2 (pg/ml) The MS target the Ag to the MQ which can present it to CD8 T cells in-vitro a MS-Ag b peptide MQ+DC B cells . . . . Ag (ug/ml) c seperated MQ and DC d peritoneal MQ DC+MS-Ag MS-Ag MQ+MS-Ag peptide DC+peptide MS empty+S-Ag MQ+peptide . Ag (ug/ml) . . . Processing of Ge/CS MS in-vivo Experimental system MS-Ag IV injection Soluble-Ag CD4 OVA-specific Hybridoma B0-97-11 2 hrs C57BL/6 mice APC MQ+DC BC IL-2 ? The Ge/Cs MS target the encapsulated Ag to MQ and DC in-vivo Presentation of Ag to CD4 T cells by APC challenged in-vivo (IP) with MS-Ag In vivo challenge with MS-Ag In vivo challenge with S-Ag DC B cells IL - / ml ) B cells MQ / ml ) Il-2(pg (pg/ml) MQ IL - Il-2(pg (pg/ml) DC . APC/w ell (x ^ ) . . APC/well (x ^ ) . The MS target the Ag to DC and MQ in-vivo and they present it to CD8 T cells In vivo challenge with MS-Ag presentation to CD T cells DC Fluore s ce nt units MQ B cells - APC/well (x ^ ) Active Targeting Targeting mAb • DC anti CD11C •B cells anti CD19 •DC and B cells anti CD40 Active Targeting by Immunospheres MS-Avidin preparation O MS NH2 H O C CH2-CH2-CH2-C-H Glutaraldehyde Avidin O MS NH C CH2-CH2-CH2-C-H O MS O O NH C CH2-CH2-CH2-C-NH- Avidin Immunosphere Formation O MS O NH C CH2-CH2-CH2-C-NH- Avidin Ab-Biotin O MS O NH C CH2-CH2-CH2-C-NH- Avidin Fluorescent label Targeting to B cells MS-CD19 72% MS-Isotype control 12 % Targeting to DC MS-CD11c 83-92% MS-Hamster IgG control 20-36% Targeting of encapsulated Ag to DC or B cell enhance the presentation of the Ag to CD4 T cells Targeting to B cells Targeting to DC MS-anti B % 100 50 0 0 0.625 1.25 2.5 Ag (ug/ml) 5 10 MS-Ig control 120 300 % 100 250 80 200 60 150 40 100 20 50 0 0 1.125 2.25 4.5 9 APC/well (x10^3) 18 % Enhancement 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 IL-2 (pg/ml) MS-Ig control % Enhancement IL-2 (pg/ml) 150 MS-anti DC Conclusions: The MS target the Ag to MQ and DC for presentation to CD4 Th cells in-vitro and in-vivo. MS can deliver the Ag to MQ and DC for presentation to CD8 Tc cells Small MS can deliver the Ag to DC for presentation to CD8 Tc cells B-cells are not effective in presenting the encapsulated Ag, invitro or in-vivo. Immunospheres efficiently target the Ag to B cells and enhance their presentation to CD4 Th cells Immunospheres efficiently target the Ag to DC. Might improve the presentation to CD8 Tc cells. Other Results : Vaccination with the Microspheres: Induces activation of Th cells, cytokines production, long term antibody production. (Adjuvant properties) The vaccine can be administered either Orally, Intraperitonealy, or Subcutaneously. Streptococcus pneumoniae (S. pneumoniae) • Gram-positive bacterium • Found in 70-80% of infants and children • 500,000 cases of pneumococcal diseases annually reported in the USA • 5-7% are fatal • Capsular polysaccharide vaccine is only 60% effective in the elderly and non-effecive in young children 17 Surface proteins identified as having antigenic properties Ling E., Feldman G., Portnoy M., Dagan R., Overweg K., Mulholland F., Chalifa-Casp V., Wells J. and Mizrachi-Nebenzahl Y. (2004), Clin. Exp. Immunol. 138, 290-298 A combined Th1 and Th2 response is required to provide protection PsipB Pneumococcal surface immunogenic protein B PsipB was cloned in E.coli, and the Ag isolated on NiNTA from cell lysate. PsipB with Alum provided 30% protection following 2 immunizations, 21 days after challenge with a lethal dose of Pnc strain WU2 Encapsulation of PsipB PsipB was encapsulated within CS/Ge microspheres in order to identify the preferred immune response. Efficiency of encapsulation was 60%. Immunization with PsipB Survival plot 120 100 PsipB+MS PsipB+Alum MS Alum No. of mice PsipB/MS 80 60 40 Non-immunized 20 0 0 2 4 6 Two IP immunizations, 3 weeks apart Intranasal challenge with pathogen – 2 weeks after 2nd vaccination 8 Future research In-vivo targeting of Ag Change of Ag Changing the Microspheres’ Composition Hyaluronic Acid (HA) Biological polysaccharide, ~400 Dalton per monomer Abundant in mammalian tissues as a lubricant, in higher MW (~106 Dalton) Low MW (~103 Dalton) HA activates the immune system through dendritic cells – Activity depends on size Carries negative charges in a physiological environment MaterialStudio – Molecular Imaging of Interaction Hyaluronic Acid Gelatin MaterialStudio – Calculation of Chi Parameter • Chi-parameter is the interaction parameter of two compounds • A very low and negative value suggests that the two materials favour the coacervate state O.D (absorbance) at 640 nm. OD 640) Ends (DNS Reducing Hyaluronic Acid – Kinetics of Enzymatic Digestion 1.2 1 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 0 0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 Reaction Time (min.) 2000U 5000U 7500U 10000U 20000U 500U 1000U HA Digestion Products 500U/5hr 500U/10min Blank 500U/60min 5,000U/60min 5,000U/10min Original HA 5,000U/24hr GA Blank HA Digestion Products 20,000U/ 24hr 2,000U/ 10min 2,000U/ 2,000U/ 30min 5hr 2,000U/24hr CS Original HA Glucuronic Acid Blank Blank Future Research Characterization of the mechanism of HA enzymatic digestion. Feasibility study of microencapsulation of antigens within HA/Gelatin microspheres. Study of the effect of HA MW on immunization Acknowledgments * * * * * * * * * The Israeli Ministry of Health Einav Danino Lilia Kotlierevski Alex Kushnir Nina Rodman Svetlana Varshitzki Sagiv Berkowitz Neta-Lee Shwartzman Eti Evzada Ran Armoza