* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download Document
Common cold wikipedia , lookup
Hospital-acquired infection wikipedia , lookup
Sociality and disease transmission wikipedia , lookup
Neonatal infection wikipedia , lookup
Social immunity wikipedia , lookup
Infection control wikipedia , lookup
Herd immunity wikipedia , lookup
Human cytomegalovirus wikipedia , lookup
Adoptive cell transfer wikipedia , lookup
Childhood immunizations in the United States wikipedia , lookup
Molecular mimicry wikipedia , lookup
Immune system wikipedia , lookup
Monoclonal antibody wikipedia , lookup
Hepatitis B wikipedia , lookup
Adaptive immune system wikipedia , lookup
Innate immune system wikipedia , lookup
Cancer immunotherapy wikipedia , lookup
Polyclonal B cell response wikipedia , lookup
Hygiene hypothesis wikipedia , lookup
Human papillomavirus infection wikipedia , lookup
Vaccination wikipedia , lookup
HPV vaccines wikipedia , lookup
Immunosuppressive drug wikipedia , lookup
Immunocontraception wikipedia , lookup
DNA vaccination wikipedia , lookup
HPV vaccines: who and when to vaccinate Margaret Stanley Department of Pathology Cambridge OUTLINE OF PRESENTATION Immune response in the natural history of HPV infections Prophylactic vaccines rationale and immune mechanisms Who and when to vaccinate before exposure ? post exposure Immunity is a partnership Innate no memory, not antigen specific activated by cell death Innate immunity kick starts adaptive immunity by activating antigen presenting cells (APC) Adaptive memory antigen specific lymphocytes key players humoral immunity antibody mediated neutralises extracellular pathogens prevents re-infection cell mediated immunity cytotoxic effector cells kill infected cells Adaptive immune responses • Type 1/Th1 Cell mediated CD4+ T cells help killers Killer T cells Activated macrophages* Cytokines* Natural killer cells* *innate effectors enhanced and activated by adaptive responses • Type 2/Th2 Humoral CD4+ T cells help B cells make antibody Non cytotoxic Antibody IgM, IgG, IgA, IgE Natural Course of Genital HPV Infection HrHPVs 12-18months Time LrHPVs 4-9months infection First Lesion DNA-ve Immune Response CMI Productive viral infection, DNA+ve low grade lesions Seroconversion Antibody to L1 Virological clearance DNA-ve Viral persistence DNA+ve LSIL/HSIL Antibody responses in natural infections are slow and weak only 50-60% of women sero-convert Why are antibody responses so poor? No viraemia HPV does not lyse keratinocytes no inflammation no pro-inflammatory cytokines poor activation of Langerhans cells and stromal dendritic cells Free virus particles are shed from mucosal surfaces with poor exposure to APC OUTLINE OF PRESENTATION Immune response in the natural history of HPV infections Prophylactic vaccines rationale and immune mechanisms Who and when to vaccinate before exposure ? post exposure Why might vaccines generating neutralising antibody be effective prophylactically ? Systemic immunisation with infectious Cotton tail rabbit papillomavirus (CRPV) •did not induce visible papillomas •generated serum neutralising antibody •immunised rabbits were protected against viral challenge Shope RE 1937 Immunisation of rabbits to infectious papillomatosis J Exp Med 65 607-24 HPV vaccines are sub-unit vaccines made of virus like particles: VLPs Making VLPs: molecular “cut and paste” “cut” the L1 gene from the virus DNA “paste” into the DNA of another microbe such as yeast or baculovirus grow the recombinant microbe in large amounts – as it grows it makes the L1 protein The chemistry of this protein is such that it self assembles into a virus like particle - an empty protein shell without DNA The VLP is morphologically and immunologically identical to the HPV virus particle HPV 16 L1 VLPs VLP vaccines: mechanisms 3 key players in the induction of the antibody response •Dendritic cells (antigen presenting cells) in the muscle •T lymphocytes in the lymph node •B lymphocytes in the lymph node Immune Response to HPV Vaccines: A Proposed Mechanism1–5 1. Stanley M. Vaccine. 2005 [Epub ahead of print]. 2. Batista FD, Neuberger MS. EMBO Journal. 2000;19:513–520. 3. Tyring SK. Curr Ther Res. 2000;61:584–596. 4. Roden RB, Hubbert NL, Kirnbauer R, et al. J Virol. 1996;70:3298–3301. 5. Chen XS, Garcea RL, Goldberg I, et al. MolCell. 2000;5:557–567. Th2 cell help for B lymphocytes is crucial to •Class switching – determines the type (IgG,etc) and amount of antibody secreted dictated by the Th2 cytokines – these in turn are regulated by antigen type antigen dose •The generation of memory and the efficiency of the response to recall antigen under the control of memory Th2 cells B cell memory and long term antibody persistence VLP vaccines generate high levels of antibody to HPV L1 Why are they so immunogenic? Delivered intramuscularly • rapid access of VLPs to blood vessels and local lymph nodes • potent activators of APC induce good T helper responses for B cells OUTLINE OF PRESENTATION Immune response in the natural history of HPV infections Prophylactic vaccines rationale and immune mechanisms Who and when to vaccinate before exposure ? post exposure Natural Course of Genital HPV Infection infection First Lesion Immune Response Seroconversion Average time 9mo Sustained clinical remission Active Growth Late (3-6 Mo.) Host Stage Containment (3-6 Mo.) DNA-ve Sero-ve Persistent or recurrent disease Quadrivalent HPV Vaccine Phase III Adolescent Immunogenicity Study Neutralizing Anti-HPV GMTs* at Month 7 1500 1500 1000 1000 500 500 0 0 Anti-HPV 11 (HPV 11 mMU/mL) Anti-HPV 6 (HPV 6 mMU/mL) 8000 6000 4000 2000 0 1500 1000 500 0 Anti-HPV 16 (HPV 16 mMU/mL) Females 10–15 Years of Age Males 10–15 Years of Age *GMT = geometric mean titers 1. Anti-HPV 18 (HPV 18 mMU/mL) Block SL, Nolan T, Sattler C, et al. Pediatrics. 2006: 118.2135-45 Females 16–23 Years of Age Age Specific Neutralizing HPV-6 Antibodies 1 Month Post-Vaccination1 PPE population* Neutralizing anti-HPV 6 GMTs at month 7 Serum cLIA GMT with 95% CI, mMU/mL Immunogenicity Bridge Efficacy Program 1600 1500 1300 1100 900 700 500 Males + Females 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 Age at Enrollment (Years) *Inclusive of five study protocols; all GMTs measured using cLIA 1. Data on file, MSD. Females Only Anti-HPV response (GMT Levels with 95% CI [log10 scale]) Demonstration of Immune Memory with an Antigen Challenge at Month 601 HPV 16 10,000 Immune memory demonstrated after immune challenge 1000 Quadrivalent HPV Vaccine n=78 100 10 Placebo (Sero (–) and PCR (–)) n=70 ↴ 0 2 3 6 7 12 18 24 30 36 Months Vaccination on day 0, at two and six months Immune challenge at 60 months • Similar results seen with HPV 18, 6, and 11 *In subjects naïve to the relevant HPV type from day 1 through month 60 1. Data on file, MSD. 54 60 61 60+1 week OUTLINE OF PRESENTATION Immune response in the natural history of HPV infections Prophylactic vaccines rationale and immune mechanisms Who and when to vaccinate before exposure ? post exposure Natural Course of Genital HPV Infection infection First Lesion Incubation (1-6 Mo.) DNA-ve Sero-ve Immune Response Seroconversion Average time 9mo Active Growth Late (3-6 Mo.) Host Stage Containment (3-6 Mo.) DNA-ve Sero+ve Sustained clinical remission Persistent or recurrent disease Gardasil Phase III HPV-Naïve Modified Intention To Treat Population Endpoint HPV vaccine Placebo cases cases n=9342 n=9400 HPV 16/18-related CIN 3 or AIS •HPV 16/18-related CIN3 •HPV 16/18-related AIS % 95% C.I Efficacy 0 52 100 93, 100 0 0 47 9 100 100 92, 100 49, 100 Mean follow up 2 years Subjects are counted once per applicable row. www.fda.gov/ohrms/dockets/ac/06/slides/2006-4222s-index.htm Geometric Mean Titer (mMU/mL) Log 10 Scale Quadrivalent HPV Vaccine Yields Higher Neutralizing Anti-HPV Antibodies in Baseline Seropositive Subjects Vaccine: naive recipient 3000 2000 1000 Placebo: naive recipient Vaccine: seropositive and PCR negative recipient Placebo: seropositive and PCR negative recipient 100 10 1 0 7 12 18 30 42 48 Months These results suggest that women who were baseline HPV sero-positive had a booster response to the vaccination. Natural Course of Genital HPV Infection infection First Lesion Incubation (1-6 Mo.) Immune Response Seroconversion Average time 9mo Active Growth Late (3-6 Mo.) Host Stage Containment (3-6 Mo.) DNA+ve Sero+ve DNA+ve Sero-ve Sustained clinical remission Persistent or recurrent disease OUTLINE OF PRESENTATION Immune response in the natural history of HPV infections Prophylactic vaccines rationale and immune mechanisms Who and when to vaccinate before exposure ? post exposure Is there cross-protection? Evidence for cross-protection against incident infection with HPV 45 and 31 after vaccination with Cervarix Harper etal Lancet April 6th 2006 Cross neutralising antibodies to HPV 45 and 31 generated after immunisation with Gardasil Titres of these cross-neutralising antibodies are 1-2 logs lower than the dominant type specific neutralising antibody Smith JF et al IPV Prague Sept 3 2006 Abstract PL 1-6 Prophylactic HPV L1 VLP vaccines Efficacy >90% for persistent infection 100% for disease (5 years post vaccination) in subjects naïve for vaccine HPV types Immunogenic high antibody concentrations up to 1000x > than in natural HPV infection Duration of protection vaccine induced antibody levels maintained over 5 years Safe no vaccine related serious adverse events identified in the trials to date (70,000 women) Protection for this generation