* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download Social Psychology – Modules 53-55
Belongingness wikipedia , lookup
Impression formation wikipedia , lookup
Human bonding wikipedia , lookup
Self-categorization theory wikipedia , lookup
Social loafing wikipedia , lookup
Unpopularity wikipedia , lookup
Attitude change wikipedia , lookup
Social dilemma wikipedia , lookup
Interpersonal attraction wikipedia , lookup
Group dynamics wikipedia , lookup
Communication in small groups wikipedia , lookup
Attribution bias wikipedia , lookup
Social tuning wikipedia , lookup
Albert Bandura wikipedia , lookup
Relational aggression wikipedia , lookup
False consensus effect wikipedia , lookup
Social Psychology – Modules 53-55 How we think about, influence and relate to others Attribution Theory How people explain someone’s behavior Behavior is attributed either to disposition or situations Disposition – Internal factors – Personality traits Situations – External factors Environment Ex. A hostile student Fundamental Attribution Error People have a tendency to default to what “kind” of a person someone is rather than rather than the environment ***Tend to favor disposition over situation Ex. “Rude” waitress talking back Ex. Quiet student in class Ex. Poverty/Unemployment The Foot in the Door Phenomenon A tendency for people who agree to a small request to comply later with a larger one – Ex. Army Recruitment Centers Attitudes are also affected by role playing Cognitive Dissonance Theory People are motivated to have consistent attitudes and behaviors People often change their attitudes to bring them into agreement with their actions Individuals experience tension when thoughts and actions don’t coincide Social Influence Conformity, Compliance and Group Behavior can illustrate the enormous power of social influence on our attitudes, beliefs, decisions and actions Advertisers and salespeople use principles of social influence to sway our decisions to buy, vote, donate, etc. Conformity Adjusting our thinking or behavior to bring it in line with some group standards Why conform? Suggestibility can have devastating results Ex. Following the death of Marilyn Monroe, suicides in U.S. spiked by more than 200 Ex. In Germany and the U.S., suicide rates escalate following fictional suicides on Soap Operas Reasons for Conforming Why do we clap when others clap? Eat as others eat? Wear what others wear? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UxB-H6f3crY We are sensitive to Social Norms – understood rules for accepted and expected behavior because of the potential price for being different We seek to avoid rejection and strive to gain social approval Ex. Marco Lokar – Seton Hall Basketball Player - 1991 Obedience People often comply with social pressures – How do they respond to outright commands? Milgram Study – Nazi Germany – “ I was only following orders” Behavior in the presence of others Social Facilitation – Performance is often stronger in the presence of others ***Opposite can also be true Social loafing Group Pressure and Conformity - Solomon Asch – Suggestibility test - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TYIh4MkcfJA Conformity is strengthened when: We are made to feel insecure or incompetent The group has at least three people The group is unanimous We admire the group’s status and attractiveness We have made no prior commitment to a response Others in the group observe our behavior Our culture strongly encourages respect for social standards Group Polarization The tendency of a group to make more extreme decisions than the group members would make individually ***In a group setting there is Diffusion of Responsibility Ex. In 1,500 cases where judges sat alone they took an extreme course of action only 30% of the time. However when sitting in a group of 3 this figure more than doubled to 65% Group Think Coined by Irving Janis Groups often make poor decisions when too little conflict exists within the group Flaws of a plan are often overlooked to avoid “rocking the boat” Group Think - continued Occurs when members of the group are more concerned with preserving solidarity than objectively evaluating all the alternatives Symptoms associated with Group Think: Close-mindedness Rationalization Ignoring dissent Minority Influence A minority in the group that unswervingly holds to its position is far more successful in swaying the majority than the minority that waffles Ex. Members of a jury Social Relations Aggression – Any physical or verbal behavior intended to hurt or destroy, whether done out of hostility or as a calculated means to an end Ex. An assertive, persistent salesperson is not aggressive A dentist who makes you feel pain is not aggressive Cyber bully…aggressive The Biology of Aggression There are three levels of physiological influences – Genetic, Neural, and Biochemical Twins independently admitted to having a “violent temper” “Vicious Mice” Finnish Psychologist Kirsti Lagerspetz Bred aggressive and more passive mice for 25 generations Neural Influences AP Exam Review… Animal and Human brains have neural systems that, when stimulated, produce aggressive behavior. Which portions of the brain? Biochemical Influences Hormones and other substances in the blood influence the neural systems that activate and inhibit aggression A raging bull will become gentle when testosterone levels are reduced – vice versa Biochemical Influences – cont’d Violent Criminals tend to be muscular, young males with lower than average intelligence scores and higher than average testosterone levels High testosterone levels correlate with delinquency, hard drug use and aggressive behavior – these effects are also intensified by alcohol Frustration-Aggression Principle Frustration causes anger, which often generates aggression Aggressive behavior can be learned through direct rewards – children who grow up observing aggressive models often imitate the behaviors that they see Tidbits about Aggression Watching violence on TV does correlate with violence in real life Over the last 3 plus decades, America’s known rape rate has tripled – Unreported rapes greatly outnumber those reported Aggression Tidbits – cont’d Correlational studies show that in times and places where sexual materials are freely available, rates of sexual violence are higher Hawaii – Number of reported rapes rose almost 900% between 1964-1974, dropped when pornography restraints were temporarily imposed, then rose again when the restraints were lifted Exceptions to every rule - Japan Lab Experiment One group viewed sexually explicit films for six weeks – A second group viewed non-erotic films during the same span Three weeks later, both groups viewed a newspaper report about a man convicted, but not yet sentenced for raping a hitchhiker When asked to suggest a prison term, those who viewed the sexually explicit films recommended sentences half as long as the other group The Bystander Effect – “The Genovese Syndrome” http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zPnK0NCn_M Q http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N26pYx0rgW I 1964 – Queens, NY – Kitty Genovese was stabbed and raped around 3:30AM 38 people reported either seeing or hearing the incident Attacked fled, and returned to stab her 8 more times 30 minutes later, someone finally called for help Bystander Effect – cont’d Three steps are important in helping: The incident must be noticed The incident must be interpreted as an emergency The bystander must assume responsibility for helping ***When people think that it is their sole responsibility to help, they are more likely to do so. Opposite is true due to Diffusion of Responsibility Odds of Helping are best when… We have just observed someone else being helpful We are not in a hurry The victim appears to need, and deserve help We are, in some way, similar to the victim We are in a small town, or rural area We feel guilty We are focused on others, and not preoccupied We are in a good mood The Psychology of Helping Social Exchange Theory – If the anticipated rewards of helping exceed the anticipated costs…you help The Psychology of Helping – cont’d Social Norms also influence helping The Reciprocity Norm teaches us that we should return help, not harm, to others Attraction What factors predict whether two people will become close friends or romantically involved? Proximity – Before friendships develop, they must begin – Geographic Nearness is perhaps the most powerful predictor of friendship Studies reveal people are most likely to marry those from same neighborhood, office, parking lot, etc. Part of the Mere Exposure Effect – Repeated Exposure to stimuli increases our likelihood of Attraction – cont’d Physical Attractiveness – What most impacts your first impressions? Intelligence? Personality? Sincerity? Hundreds of studies indicated it is much more superficial…Appearance http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kS_jdcV5Qs M&feature=related Attraction – cont’d Attractive people are perceived as happier, more sensitive, more successful, and more socially skilled However… they are often viewed as less honest, and less compassionate Do you love someone because they are beautiful, or is the person beautiful because you love them? Attraction – cont’d Similarity – Do opposites attract? Not usually…we tend to like things or people that are like us http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GLeKEr5JC FM&feature=related Friends and couples are not usually paired with people unless they share common attitudes, beliefs or interests Attraction – cont’d Romantic Love – Two types of love Temporary Passionate Love – Key ingredient is arousal Companionate Love – More enduring, based on equity and trust. Vital ingredient is self-disclosure – revealing intimate details about yourself